The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
[SCOTUS] Kavanaugh Expresses Regret For Real Victim: Brett Kavanaugh
*OP stolen with malice aforethought from sig's original.
As previously noted:
Expectations for this thread
1. This is not the general politics or lol this party sucks thread.
2. This is a thread about the US Supreme Court, if it doesn't have anything to do with SCOTUS, it doesn't belong here.
3. Not all things about SCOTUS belong here. Some cases dealing with certain issues, already have a thread or their own god damn separate thread that is more appropriate to discuss a certain SCOTUS rulings or cases.
4. In the event that a tangent regarding something involving SCOTUS has it's own thread created after the discussion starts in this thread, then move the discussion over to the new thread. (Also appreciated if people link to the new thread to help others out). 5. In the event that we get a SCOTUS vacancy in the lifetime of this thread, this would probably be the best place to discuss such an appointment given how low traffic this thread is likely to be. (leaving this for posterity and lols - SIG)
Read SCOTUSBlog for all the latest and greatest info you could ever need about our highest court: http://www.scotusblog.com/
HakkekageSpace Whore Academysumma cum laudeRegistered Userregular
How can it be that a bunch of privileged old white men relate more to the horror of being accused of violence toward women than the horror of being a victim of violence toward women and having no recourse but to be traumatized in private or destroyed in public
How can it be that a bunch of privileged old white men relate more to the horror of being accused of violence toward women than the horror of being a victim of violence toward women and having no recourse but to be traumatized in private or destroyed in public
It simply does not compute
Privileged old white men are regularly, and for good reasons, accused of violence towards women, but they are not often the victims of violence towards women.
How can it be that a bunch of privileged old white men relate more to the horror of being accused of violence toward women than the horror of being a victim of violence toward women and having no recourse but to be traumatized in private or destroyed in public
It simply does not compute
Privileged old white men are regularly, and for good reasons, accused of violence towards women, but they are not often the victims of violence towards women.
Something I don't get is how there is this discussion about how red state Dems are less likely to vote yes now.. why was that ever in question?
Is everybody in politics that shortsighted? Or is this whole not rock the boat bullshit that heavy on the Dems side?
"red state" dems might conceivably think that they will lose their next election were they to vote yes, which sounds mercenary and self-serving, but it also means they're reacting to the perceived will of their voters.
If a Democrat votes to confirm Kavanaugh, it'll be because they think the electorate in the state they represent wants them to. Bad as that might be for the country, it's also generally the way we want things to run.
Something I don't get is how there is this discussion about how red state Dems are less likely to vote yes now.. why was that ever in question?
Is everybody in politics that shortsighted? Or is this whole not rock the boat bullshit that heavy on the Dems side?
"red state" dems might conceivably think that they will lose their next election were they to vote yes, which sounds mercenary and self-serving, but it also means they're reacting to the perceived will of their voters.
If a Democrat votes to confirm Kavanaugh, it'll be because they think the electorate in the state they represent wants them to. Bad as that might be for the country, it's also generally the way we want things to run.
If Dr. Ford weathers this onslaught even fairly well not only may they find themselves with an even bigger downside for voting for Kavanaugh, they can kiss their future in the party goodbye as well.
We're entering a turnout/enthusiasm election, this is not the time to shit on your base.
RedTide#1907 on Battle.net
Come Overwatch with meeeee
How can it be that a bunch of privileged old white men relate more to the horror of being accused of violence toward women than the horror of being a victim of violence toward women and having no recourse but to be traumatized in private or destroyed in public
It simply does not compute
Privileged old white men are regularly, and for good reasons, accused of violence towards women, but they are not often the victims of violence towards women.
Something I don't get is how there is this discussion about how red state Dems are less likely to vote yes now.. why was that ever in question?
Is everybody in politics that shortsighted? Or is this whole not rock the boat bullshit that heavy on the Dems side?
"red state" dems might conceivably think that they will lose their next election were they to vote yes, which sounds mercenary and self-serving, but it also means they're reacting to the perceived will of their voters.
If a Democrat votes to confirm Kavanaugh, it'll be because they think the electorate in the state they represent wants them to. Bad as that might be for the country, it's also generally the way we want things to run.
No it isn't. If it was, we'd just be done with it and have a direct democracy. We elect representatives because we expect them to use their judgement when making decisions.
Something I don't get is how there is this discussion about how red state Dems are less likely to vote yes now.. why was that ever in question?
Is everybody in politics that shortsighted? Or is this whole not rock the boat bullshit that heavy on the Dems side?
"red state" dems might conceivably think that they will lose their next election were they to vote yes, which sounds mercenary and self-serving, but it also means they're reacting to the perceived will of their voters.
If a Democrat votes to confirm Kavanaugh, it'll be because they think the electorate in the state they represent wants them to. Bad as that might be for the country, it's also generally the way we want things to run.
If Dr. Ford weathers this onslaught even fairly well not only may they find themselves with an even bigger downside for voting for Kavanaugh, they can kiss their future in the party goodbye as well.
We're entering a turnout/enthusiasm election, this is not the time to shit on your base.
completely true - it's the essential challenge 'red state' Senators have to face. Which constituency do they back, in a coalition that could vanish because of the ultimate wedge issue?
No it isn't. If it was, we'd just be done with it and have a direct democracy. We elect representatives because we expect them to use their judgement when making decisions.
We weren't even supposed to be electing senators directly in the first place. This is just one more step down a well-trodden path to the "mob rule" (i.e. full democracy) that the founders worried about.
Something I don't get is how there is this discussion about how red state Dems are less likely to vote yes now.. why was that ever in question?
Is everybody in politics that shortsighted? Or is this whole not rock the boat bullshit that heavy on the Dems side?
"red state" dems might conceivably think that they will lose their next election were they to vote yes, which sounds mercenary and self-serving, but it also means they're reacting to the perceived will of their voters.
If a Democrat votes to confirm Kavanaugh, it'll be because they think the electorate in the state they represent wants them to. Bad as that might be for the country, it's also generally the way we want things to run.
If the nomination to the Supreme Court of an accused rapist, obvious perjurer, and possible alcoholic with a gambling problem reprobate who holds retrograde views on nearly everything isn't the place for our elected representatives to say "No" regardless the wishes of their constituents, then we might as well replace the Senate with a link to a SurveyMonkey poll.
daveNYC on
Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
+2
AstaerethIn the belly of the beastRegistered Userregular
Luckily, in this instance at least polling suggests that red state Republicans won’t change their vote based on what their Democratic senator does with Kavanaugh, while red state Democrats will. Kavanaugh is so unpopular that red state Dem senators can actually do the right thing here and be doing the smart political thing.
State govt appointment of senators just gave us the most corrupt party hacks the state could find
It was a bad system
It's "badness" was most notable in New York. The heads of the State Democratic Party were, among other professions, News Paper owners and Bankers. They picked the NY State Senators out of their social circles.
The more relevant question is why go to such lengths if Ms. Ford really wanted her name to stay a secret? Even this weekend she could have chosen to remain anonymous. These are the actions of someone who was prepared to go public from the beginning if she had to.
The role of Senator Dianne Feinstein is also highly irregular and transparently political. The ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee knew about Ms. Ford’s accusations in late July or early August yet kept quiet. If she took it seriously, she had multiple opportunities to ask Judge Kavanaugh or have committee staff interview the principals. But in that event the details would have been vetted and Senators would have had time to assess their credibility.
Instead Ms. Feinstein waited until the day before a committee markup on the nomination to release a statement that she had “information” about the accusation and had sent it to the FBI. Her statement was a political stunt.
She had journalists showing up at her house so this isn't really true.
There's going to be a 1.5 million dollar ad campaign supporting Kavanaugh (read: slandering Ford) from some hyper-conservative super PAC that I don't remember the exact disingenuous name of, according to NPR.
But at the end of the day, cleaning up your own house isn’t just the right thing to do — it’s smart politics. If Kirsten Gillibrand and other women of the Democratic Senate caucus hadn’t pushed Franken out months ago, today’s strong political hand versus Kavanaugh could easily have been a Menendez-like fiasco instead.
But at the end of the day, cleaning up your own house isn’t just the right thing to do — it’s smart politics. If Kirsten Gillibrand and other women of the Democratic Senate caucus hadn’t pushed Franken out months ago, today’s strong political hand versus Kavanaugh could easily have been a Menendez-like fiasco instead.
This would be true if it wasn't for the current Keith Ellison situation, which the Democrats are handling just like the Republicans are handling Kavanaugh.
There's going to be a 1.5 million dollar ad campaign supporting Kavanaugh (read: slandering Ford) from some hyper-conservative super PAC that I don't remember the exact disingenuous name of, according to NPR.
They were all prepared for this. Wouldn't be surprised if we find out later this was one of those "open secrets" in GOP circles in Washington.
My zombie survival life simulator They Don't Sleep is out now on Steam if you want to check it out.
But at the end of the day, cleaning up your own house isn’t just the right thing to do — it’s smart politics. If Kirsten Gillibrand and other women of the Democratic Senate caucus hadn’t pushed Franken out months ago, today’s strong political hand versus Kavanaugh could easily have been a Menendez-like fiasco instead.
This would be true if it wasn't for the current Keith Ellison situation, which the Democrats are handling just like the Republicans are handling Kavanaugh.
Nobody is really paying any attention to that is the thing.
“Here is the calculus,” said a former top administration official. “The Supreme Court was one of the top reasons why many Republicans supported President Trump during the 2016 campaign. If they were to pull Kavanaugh, there is a real chance of depressing the base.”
Would it really depress the base? Was the SC pick the reason the base supported him or was it the reason the other Republican politicians supported him? Cause I don't see his base caring THAT much about the SC pick.
“Here is the calculus,” said a former top administration official. “The Supreme Court was one of the top reasons why many Republicans supported President Trump during the 2016 campaign. If they were to pull Kavanaugh, there is a real chance of depressing the base.”
Would it really depress the base? Was the SC pick the reason the base supported him or was it the reason the other Republican politicians supported him? Cause I don't see his base caring THAT much about the SC pick.
The Supreme Court is the reason the Dominionists sold their souls to back him.
But at the end of the day, cleaning up your own house isn’t just the right thing to do — it’s smart politics. If Kirsten Gillibrand and other women of the Democratic Senate caucus hadn’t pushed Franken out months ago, today’s strong political hand versus Kavanaugh could easily have been a Menendez-like fiasco instead.
This would be true if it wasn't for the current Keith Ellison situation, which the Democrats are handling just like the Republicans are handling Kavanaugh.
Nobody is really paying any attention to that is the thing.
Ellison is definitely a GOP talking point that I've been seeing. Dunno how much traction it will have.
+1
IlpalaJust this guy, y'knowTexasRegistered Userregular
“Here is the calculus,” said a former top administration official. “The Supreme Court was one of the top reasons why many Republicans supported President Trump during the 2016 campaign. If they were to pull Kavanaugh, there is a real chance of depressing the base.”
Would it really depress the base? Was the SC pick the reason the base supported him or was it the reason the other Republican politicians supported him? Cause I don't see his base caring THAT much about the SC pick.
When you ask pretty much ANY Trump supporter how they can be alright with what's going on in the country today, one of the first five words out of their mouths is "Gorsuch"
FF XIV - Qih'to Furishu (on Siren), Battle.Net - Ilpala#1975
Switch - SW-7373-3669-3011
Fuck Joe Manchin
But at the end of the day, cleaning up your own house isn’t just the right thing to do — it’s smart politics. If Kirsten Gillibrand and other women of the Democratic Senate caucus hadn’t pushed Franken out months ago, today’s strong political hand versus Kavanaugh could easily have been a Menendez-like fiasco instead.
This would be true if it wasn't for the current Keith Ellison situation, which the Democrats are handling just like the Republicans are handling Kavanaugh.
Nobody is really paying any attention to that is the thing.
Ellison is definitely a GOP talking point that I've been seeing. Dunno how much traction it will have.
Oh, it's making the rounds of the right-wing media bubble but it seems to have zero presence in the real media.
Right wing media reaches the half of the voters who actually vote, so that's a big deal
Not really on any of those points. It doesn't reach half of voters, the right are not the only people who vote as has been demonstrated pretty well in all the elections we've seen since Trump's election and the whole point of most of these kind of things is to push them into the mainstream press to garner legitimacy. We aren't seeing any Senators bringing up Ellison yet with the press, as an example.
But at the end of the day, cleaning up your own house isn’t just the right thing to do — it’s smart politics. If Kirsten Gillibrand and other women of the Democratic Senate caucus hadn’t pushed Franken out months ago, today’s strong political hand versus Kavanaugh could easily have been a Menendez-like fiasco instead.
This would be true if it wasn't for the current Keith Ellison situation, which the Democrats are handling just like the Republicans are handling Kavanaugh.
Nobody is really paying any attention to that is the thing.
Ellison is definitely a GOP talking point that I've been seeing. Dunno how much traction it will have.
Oh, it's making the rounds of the right-wing media bubble but it seems to have zero presence in the real media.
It's a bigger deal here in Minnesota, which makes sense since Ellison is running for a state office rather than a national one. But the way the Democrats have handled the situation pretty much undermines any 'high ground' they might have had from the Franken situation. They seem to only rush to 'believe women' when the accused is a Republican.
Ellison doesn't have anything to do with the Kavanaugh situation, of course, and if the Kavanaugh accusation is proven, then he should definitely not be confirmed, and should probably be in jail. But let's not pretend that there isn't a huge amount of politics involved in all of this. The Democrats still have a ways to go with cleaning up their own house (as does pretty much every group, sadly).
There's going to be a 1.5 million dollar ad campaign supporting Kavanaugh (read: slandering Ford) from some hyper-conservative super PAC that I don't remember the exact disingenuous name of, according to NPR.
They were all prepared for this. Wouldn't be surprised if we find out later this was one of those "open secrets" in GOP circles in Washington.
I remembered the name of the super PAC.
The Judicial Crisis Network.
According to Wikipedia they funded a huge ad campaign to oppose Merrick Garland, and as of August they have already spent $4.5 million on ads supporting Kavanaugh. It was founded in 2005 to support W's nominees and since 2014 it has been run by Carrie Severino, a former law clerk of, drumroll please, Clarence Thomas.
The reason the woman in the Ellison story refuses to provide the tape she claims she has keeps shifting in that story, which makes people skeptical about her truthfulness.
In contrast, Ford seems to have been telling the same story for six years.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
But at the end of the day, cleaning up your own house isn’t just the right thing to do — it’s smart politics. If Kirsten Gillibrand and other women of the Democratic Senate caucus hadn’t pushed Franken out months ago, today’s strong political hand versus Kavanaugh could easily have been a Menendez-like fiasco instead.
This would be true if it wasn't for the current Keith Ellison situation, which the Democrats are handling just like the Republicans are handling Kavanaugh.
Nobody is really paying any attention to that is the thing.
Ellison is definitely a GOP talking point that I've been seeing. Dunno how much traction it will have.
Oh, it's making the rounds of the right-wing media bubble but it seems to have zero presence in the real media.
It's a bigger deal here in Minnesota, which makes sense since Ellison is running for a state office rather than a national one. But the way the Democrats have handled the situation pretty much undermines any 'high ground' they might have had from the Franken situation. They seem to only rush to 'believe women' when the accused is a Republican.
Ellison doesn't have anything to do with the Kavanaugh situation, of course, and if the Kavanaugh accusation is proven, then he should definitely not be confirmed, and should probably be in jail. But let's not pretend that there isn't a huge amount of politics involved in all of this. The Democrats still have a ways to go with cleaning up their own house (as does pretty much every group, sadly).
No, there's a huge amount of politics involved in the Ellison situation. The Kavanaugh situation is still just "he's a rapist". The "moral highground" argument is just a form of whataboutism, since what happens to Ellison is no more relevant to whether Kavanaugh is a rapist then Chappaquiddick. It's only relevant politically, in so far as it may or may not effect how well arguments against Kavanaugh play in the media. And politically it has no traction so far as it relates to this situation.
Grassley says there will only be the two witnesses, so we remain not actually interested in the truth. Could call Mark Judge to testify, Ford's therapist, etc.
The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
Grassley says there will only be the two witnesses, so we remain not actually interested in the truth. Could call Mark Judge to testify, Ford's therapist, etc.
Unsurprising. They just want to do a little song and dance to appease any wishy-washy Republican votes and give the appearance to the media of having been serious and then jam this shit through as quickly and as quietly as possible.
Posts
Scheduled for Monday, for what it’s worth.
Steam: Elvenshae // PSN: Elvenshae // WotC: Elvenshae
Wilds of Aladrion: [https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/comment/43159014/#Comment_43159014]Ellandryn[/url]
Is everybody in politics that shortsighted? Or is this whole not rock the boat bullshit that heavy on the Dems side?
Steam Profile | Signature art by Alexandra 'Lexxy' Douglass
If he was going to get through anyway its a way some of the red state Dems up for reelection(like Manchin) can grab some easy "nonpartisan" cred
ABC reporter:
ARGH!
It simply does not compute
NNID: Hakkekage
Privileged old white men are regularly, and for good reasons, accused of violence towards women, but they are not often the victims of violence towards women.
I’m pretty sure Hakkes was being sarcastic
"red state" dems might conceivably think that they will lose their next election were they to vote yes, which sounds mercenary and self-serving, but it also means they're reacting to the perceived will of their voters.
If a Democrat votes to confirm Kavanaugh, it'll be because they think the electorate in the state they represent wants them to. Bad as that might be for the country, it's also generally the way we want things to run.
If Dr. Ford weathers this onslaught even fairly well not only may they find themselves with an even bigger downside for voting for Kavanaugh, they can kiss their future in the party goodbye as well.
We're entering a turnout/enthusiasm election, this is not the time to shit on your base.
Come Overwatch with meeeee
No it isn't. If it was, we'd just be done with it and have a direct democracy. We elect representatives because we expect them to use their judgement when making decisions.
completely true - it's the essential challenge 'red state' Senators have to face. Which constituency do they back, in a coalition that could vanish because of the ultimate wedge issue?
We weren't even supposed to be electing senators directly in the first place. This is just one more step down a well-trodden path to the "mob rule" (i.e. full democracy) that the founders worried about.
It was a bad system
If the nomination to the Supreme Court of an accused rapist, obvious perjurer, and possible alcoholic with a gambling problem reprobate who holds retrograde views on nearly everything isn't the place for our elected representatives to say "No" regardless the wishes of their constituents, then we might as well replace the Senate with a link to a SurveyMonkey poll.
It's "badness" was most notable in New York. The heads of the State Democratic Party were, among other professions, News Paper owners and Bankers. They picked the NY State Senators out of their social circles.
kavanaugh is wildly unpopular
red state dems are being really dumb if they decide to die on this hill
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-metoo-kavanaugh-ambush-1537197395 She had journalists showing up at her house so this isn't really true.
Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
This would be true if it wasn't for the current Keith Ellison situation, which the Democrats are handling just like the Republicans are handling Kavanaugh.
They were all prepared for this. Wouldn't be surprised if we find out later this was one of those "open secrets" in GOP circles in Washington.
Nobody is really paying any attention to that is the thing.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/team-trump-if-we-ditch-kavanaugh-were-signing-our-own-death-warrant?ref=home
Would it really depress the base? Was the SC pick the reason the base supported him or was it the reason the other Republican politicians supported him? Cause I don't see his base caring THAT much about the SC pick.
The Supreme Court is the reason the Dominionists sold their souls to back him.
Ellison is definitely a GOP talking point that I've been seeing. Dunno how much traction it will have.
When you ask pretty much ANY Trump supporter how they can be alright with what's going on in the country today, one of the first five words out of their mouths is "Gorsuch"
Switch - SW-7373-3669-3011
Fuck Joe Manchin
Oh, it's making the rounds of the right-wing media bubble but it seems to have zero presence in the real media.
Not really on any of those points. It doesn't reach half of voters, the right are not the only people who vote as has been demonstrated pretty well in all the elections we've seen since Trump's election and the whole point of most of these kind of things is to push them into the mainstream press to garner legitimacy. We aren't seeing any Senators bringing up Ellison yet with the press, as an example.
It's a bigger deal here in Minnesota, which makes sense since Ellison is running for a state office rather than a national one. But the way the Democrats have handled the situation pretty much undermines any 'high ground' they might have had from the Franken situation. They seem to only rush to 'believe women' when the accused is a Republican.
Ellison doesn't have anything to do with the Kavanaugh situation, of course, and if the Kavanaugh accusation is proven, then he should definitely not be confirmed, and should probably be in jail. But let's not pretend that there isn't a huge amount of politics involved in all of this. The Democrats still have a ways to go with cleaning up their own house (as does pretty much every group, sadly).
I remembered the name of the super PAC.
The Judicial Crisis Network.
According to Wikipedia they funded a huge ad campaign to oppose Merrick Garland, and as of August they have already spent $4.5 million on ads supporting Kavanaugh. It was founded in 2005 to support W's nominees and since 2014 it has been run by Carrie Severino, a former law clerk of, drumroll please, Clarence Thomas.
Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
In contrast, Ford seems to have been telling the same story for six years.
No, there's a huge amount of politics involved in the Ellison situation. The Kavanaugh situation is still just "he's a rapist". The "moral highground" argument is just a form of whataboutism, since what happens to Ellison is no more relevant to whether Kavanaugh is a rapist then Chappaquiddick. It's only relevant politically, in so far as it may or may not effect how well arguments against Kavanaugh play in the media. And politically it has no traction so far as it relates to this situation.
Unsurprising. They just want to do a little song and dance to appease any wishy-washy Republican votes and give the appearance to the media of having been serious and then jam this shit through as quickly and as quietly as possible.