The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[Hiberno-Britannic Politics] Helter Skelter

BogartBogart Streetwise HerculesRegistered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
edited March 2019 in Debate and/or Discourse
Credit for OP goes to RMS, I think. I dunno, it's been the same one for a while. So this archipelago

522px-Britain_and_Ireland_satellite_image_bright.png

Has these nations.

200px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png200px-Flag_of_Ireland.svg.png

These nations are almost completely (not) unique in that they're run by a system known as Politics!

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Run by these folk.

2016-07-13-1468405452-1079265-Theresa_May.jpg465px-Arlene_Foster_MLA.jpg

These folk would rather they didn't.

381px-Jeremy_Corbyn%2C_Tolpuddle_2016%2C_1_crop.jpg_50578759_jex_910384_de02-1.jpg
396px-Boris_Johnson_July_2015.jpg[img][/img]
gerry-adams-locked-out-752x501.jpg

The Issue



A spiffing place to keep up to date with the latest developments.

An Poblacht na hÉireann

I really need to start paying attention to the political situation down south, especially with that threatened and justified EU veto. It looked like there might be an election but now there isn't?

GeocitiesInConstruction.gif

A shockin' good place to see what the feck the craic is.

The Gang of Seven have formed a new Party, well, not a party right now, but a group, called The Independent Group. Will their numbers swell, or will the bandits pick them off one after the other as they defend the village? Chukka does look a bit like Yul Brynner, doesn't he? Who's his Steve McQueen going to be? Who is the Horst Buckholz? Obviously Mike Gapes is the Brad Dexter of the group.

Bogart on
«134567100

Posts

  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    The last thread lasted just over two months. If this one is similar, then by the end of this thread we will either be in an absolute state of mass panic, or worse, left the EU with no deal...

  • KarlKarl Registered User regular
    Bad-Beat wrote: »
    The last thread lasted just over two months. If this one is similar, then by the end of this thread we will either be in an absolute state of mass panic, or worse, left the EU with no deal...

    My money is on the latter.

    We're not competent enough to actually work out a deal IMO

  • KetBraKetBra Dressed Ridiculously Registered User regular
    Bad-Beat wrote: »
    The last thread lasted just over two months. If this one is similar, then by the end of this thread we will either be in an absolute state of mass panic, or worse, left the EU with no deal...

    I have complete confidence that it will somehow end up being worse than either of those possibilities

    KGMvDLc.jpg?1
  • BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    We already have a withdrawal agreement, it's just that right now Parliament doesn't want it. May is betting that if nothing takes its place before March 29th enough MPs will decide it's better than nothing (which is true) and vote for it.

  • SolarSolar Registered User regular
    Basically it's whether a sufficient majority of Parliament gets its act together on an alternative to the government's deal, I think.

  • WotanAnubisWotanAnubis Registered User regular
    Bad-Beat wrote: »
    The last thread lasted just over two months. If this one is similar, then by the end of this thread we will either be in an absolute state of mass panic, or worse, left the EU with no deal...

    So I guess the next thread is going to start on March 29th. And last for about a week until it hits 100 pages, maybe.

  • BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    Rumours have started flying about that Anna Soubry and Sarah Wollaston will join the Independent Group. I'd expect a lot of these rumours for a while, which will tail off if none of them come true.

    I think it's a good thing that MPs unhappy with their own party now have something they can point to and say start listening or I'm off over there. They might all get kicked out at the next election or they might snowball and become a genuine third option. Who knows? May you live in interesting times etc

  • BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    They're having to reach a bit for dirt on the gang of 7. This morning the hot goss on Berger around Corbyn twitter was that she's renting a flat owned by a company registered in the Virgin Islands. That's right, she's renting a flat owned by a tax-avoiding company.

    The proper way to live in a flat is of course to take half a million quid in an interest free loan from a union and buy it outright, as brave hero Len McCluskey did.

  • ThirithThirith Registered User regular
    I've said it before, but what frustrates me about Corbyn's Labour, at least in times of Brexit, isn't that it's too left-wing: it's that it's too stupidly left-wing. It's the kind of politics that doesn't want to affect anything, it just wants to look properly socialist while doing nothing. In addition, it's intellectually dishonest, disingenuous or plain anti-intellectual left-wing. There is still a fair amount of political positions on which I'd agree with Corbyn, but I don't trust him to act effectively on any of them based on how he's handled and is still handling Brexit.

    webp-net-resizeimage.jpg
    "Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods
  • Red or AliveRed or Alive Registered User regular
    Bogart wrote: »
    They're having to reach a bit for dirt on the gang of 7. This morning the hot goss on Berger around Corbyn twitter was that she's renting a flat owned by a company registered in the Virgin Islands. That's right, she's renting a flat owned by a tax-avoiding company.

    The proper way to live in a flat is of course to take half a million quid in an interest free loan from a union and buy it outright, as brave hero Len McCluskey did.

    I don't think they need to dig up dirt - as long as the old trots can throw out the words "Blairite" and "Centrist" then they'll feel that they've made their argument.

  • GvzbgulGvzbgul Registered User regular
    Has there been any talk of changing FPTP?

  • Stabbity StyleStabbity Style He/Him | Warning: Mothership Reporting Kennewick, WARegistered User regular
    Gvzbgul wrote: »
    Has there been any talk of changing FPTP?

    Has enough time passed since the last attempt failed?

    Stabbity_Style.png
  • SolarSolar Registered User regular
    McCluskey truly is a dickhead of the highest order

  • BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    Gvzbgul wrote: »
    Has there been any talk of changing FPTP?

    None whatsoever from either the Tories or Labour, nor will there be. It's a system that benefits both of them and ensures the government will one one or the other so neither will want to change it.

  • dylmandylman Registered User regular
    edited February 2019
    I think it'll come up again when/if Scotland and NI leave, as at that point the only party capable of being elected under FPTP will be the Tories. I don't think Labour can possibly win enough seats in just England and Wales to secure a majority.

    dylman on
  • klemmingklemming Registered User regular
    dylman wrote: »
    I think it'll come up again when/if Scotland and NI leave, as at that point the only party capable of being elected under FPTP will be the Tories. I don't think Labour can possibly win enough seats in just England and Wales to secure a majority.
    At which point, who's going to change it while they're in a position to?

    Nobody remembers the singer. The song remains.
  • BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    dylman wrote: »
    I think it'll come up again when/if Scotland and NI leave, as at that point the only party capable of being elected under FPTP will be the Tories. I don't think Labour can possibly win enough seats in just England and Wales to secure a majority.

    They did it in 1997 winning enough seats to make Scotland immaterial to their majority, which was admittedly a landslide victory over a clapped-out, exhausted Tory government. NI leaving would probably help Labour a little, as the two parties returning MPs from there are either the swivel-eyed nutjobs of the DUP who are implacably opposed to Labour, or Sinn Fein, who are much more sympathetic to Labour but who don't actually turn up and vote.

    At present Scotland is barely returning any Labour MPs anyway, certainly not enough to make much of a difference. At present the Tories have almost double the number of Labour MPs in Scotland, so Scotland becoming independent would help Labour right now.

  • daveNYCdaveNYC Why universe hate Waspinator? Registered User regular
    I think the 'best' part of May playing chicken with no-deal in order to get her deal passed, is that it actually works to maximize the damage that will result. Either no-deal happens, rocks fall, everyone dies; or May's deal passes, but it does so as late as possible which means every company dealing with the UK will have already done their best to cut back on their UK operations.

    Every single part of this process has been done in the absolute worst possible way.

    Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
  • PerduraboPerdurabo Registered User regular
    Am I right in thinking that if the court case from Gina Miller didn't happen, May's deal would have just been agreed without Parliament? But by including parliament we're now at the precipice of falling off the cliff edge? Talk about unintended consequences.

  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck lonely, but not unloved dreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered User regular
    Perdurabo wrote: »
    Am I right in thinking that if the court case from Gina Miller didn't happen, May's deal would have just been agreed without Parliament? But by including parliament we're now at the precipice of falling off the cliff edge? Talk about unintended consequences.

    lots of mps trying to force meaningful parliamentary input, although certainly in this timeline the miller case was important

    re: fptp

    corbyn was talking about a constitutional convention and reform to the house of commons (make-up mps to make it representational a la new zealand but keep the constituency connection) and lords (fully elected) in 2015 but then brexit happened and he stopped talking about it

    3fpohw4n01yj.png
  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    daveNYC wrote: »
    I think the 'best' part of May playing chicken with no-deal in order to get her deal passed, is that it actually works to maximize the damage that will result. Either no-deal happens, rocks fall, everyone dies; or May's deal passes, but it does so as late as possible which means every company dealing with the UK will have already done their best to cut back on their UK operations.

    Every single part of this process has been done in the absolute worst possible way.
    Now there's a perfect description of Brexit if I ever saw one

    kFJhXwE.jpgkFJhXwE.jpg
  • CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    I honestly don't believe Corbyn would ever do anything about FPTP. No matter what he said when he first got the leadership in the intervening years he's proven himself more than willing to tolerate any level of corruption and systemic failure that could plausibly benefit him, even if it currently isn't.

  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Bogart wrote: »
    We already have a withdrawal agreement, it's just that right now Parliament doesn't want it. May is betting that if nothing takes its place before March 29th enough MPs will decide it's better than nothing (which is true) and vote for it.

    Too bad her hand is two pair Aces over Eights.

  • SporkAndrewSporkAndrew Registered User, ClubPA regular
    moniker wrote: »
    Bogart wrote: »
    We already have a withdrawal agreement, it's just that right now Parliament doesn't want it. May is betting that if nothing takes its place before March 29th enough MPs will decide it's better than nothing (which is true) and vote for it.

    Too bad her hand is two pair Aces over Eights.

    From what I can tell she's holding a Joker, the "rules of poker" card, a Death from a tarot deck and a 1992 Sheffield Wednesday Panini sticker

    The one about the fucking space hairdresser and the cowboy. He's got a tinfoil pal and a pedal bin
  • CroakerBCCroakerBC TorontoRegistered User regular
    moniker wrote: »
    Bogart wrote: »
    We already have a withdrawal agreement, it's just that right now Parliament doesn't want it. May is betting that if nothing takes its place before March 29th enough MPs will decide it's better than nothing (which is true) and vote for it.

    Too bad her hand is two pair Aces over Eights.

    From what I can tell she's holding a Joker, the "rules of poker" card, a Death from a tarot deck and a 1992 Sheffield Wednesday Panini sticker

    Unfortunately, everyone else is playing Chess.

  • halkunhalkun Registered User regular
    edited February 2019
    As an outsider looking in, I wanted to comment on a particular MP, but didn't know his name. Amusingly enough, the first link I got when I googled "Brexit bad haircut" gave me an answer.
    I guess what I wanted to say was Boris Johnson's hair looks like a shredded sheet of fabric softener.

    halkun on
  • BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    edited February 2019
    Not to be outdone by Angela Smith being a bit racist within hours of leaving the Labour party, Ruth George MP, who didn't leave, has been a bit racist in suggesting that she "wouldn't condemn" anyone suggesting that the 7 who left are being funded by Israel.

    She has since apologised and certainly didn't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist or an anti-semite.

    Bogart on
  • daveNYCdaveNYC Why universe hate Waspinator? Registered User regular
    CroakerBC wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Bogart wrote: »
    We already have a withdrawal agreement, it's just that right now Parliament doesn't want it. May is betting that if nothing takes its place before March 29th enough MPs will decide it's better than nothing (which is true) and vote for it.

    Too bad her hand is two pair Aces over Eights.

    From what I can tell she's holding a Joker, the "rules of poker" card, a Death from a tarot deck and a 1992 Sheffield Wednesday Panini sticker

    Unfortunately, everyone else is playing Chess.

    Unfortunately smart and clever don't necessarily trump sheer mule-headed stubbornness.

    Shut up, Mr. Burton! You were not brought upon this world to get it!
  • Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    edited February 2019
    Thirith wrote: »
    I've said it before, but what frustrates me about Corbyn's Labour, at least in times of Brexit, isn't that it's too left-wing: it's that it's too stupidly left-wing. It's the kind of politics that doesn't want to affect anything, it just wants to look properly socialist while doing nothing. In addition, it's intellectually dishonest, disingenuous or plain anti-intellectual left-wing. There is still a fair amount of political positions on which I'd agree with Corbyn, but I don't trust him to act effectively on any of them based on how he's handled and is still handling Brexit.

    Indeed, I'd bust out the dread word "performative", but in fact most of them seem to be quite sincere and earnest about being utter knobs.

    Commander Zoom on
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    Bogart wrote: »
    Not to be outdone by Angela Smith being a bit racist within hours of leaving the Labour party, Ruth George MP, who didn't leave, has been a bit racist in suggesting that she "wouldn't condemn" anyone suggesting that the 7 who left are being funded by Israel.

    She has since apologised and certainly didn't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist or an anti-semite.

    How the hell do you go "Those folks who accused us of being anti-semitic? Funded by Jews" and not just have your head explode.

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • mrondeaumrondeau Montréal, CanadaRegistered User regular
    Bogart wrote: »
    Not to be outdone by Angela Smith being a bit racist within hours of leaving the Labour party, Ruth George MP, who didn't leave, has been a bit racist in suggesting that she "wouldn't condemn" anyone suggesting that the 7 who left are being funded by Israel.

    She has since apologised and certainly didn't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist or an anti-semite.

    How the hell do you go "Those folks who accused us of being anti-semitic? Funded by Jews" and not just have your head explode.
    We managed to get people to accept that calling yourself a "racist" is bad, but we didn't manage to establish a link between the word and behaviour.
    This is a special case of this general problem.

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Bogart wrote: »
    Not to be outdone by Angela Smith being a bit racist within hours of leaving the Labour party, Ruth George MP, who didn't leave, has been a bit racist in suggesting that she "wouldn't condemn" anyone suggesting that the 7 who left are being funded by Israel.

    She has since apologised and certainly didn't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist or an anti-semite.

    Holy shit what is wrong with theses people? How insane is this party?

  • pezgenpezgen Registered User regular
    Perdurabo wrote: »
    Am I right in thinking that if the court case from Gina Miller didn't happen, May's deal would have just been agreed without Parliament? But by including parliament we're now at the precipice of falling off the cliff edge? Talk about unintended consequences.

    I think the Miller case was about the PM’s ability to make the article 50 notification, not the negotiation/“meaningful vote”. The need for a vote came from Dominic Grieve last year, I think?

  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck lonely, but not unloved dreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered User regular
    pezgen wrote: »
    Perdurabo wrote: »
    Am I right in thinking that if the court case from Gina Miller didn't happen, May's deal would have just been agreed without Parliament? But by including parliament we're now at the precipice of falling off the cliff edge? Talk about unintended consequences.

    I think the Miller case was about the PM’s ability to make the article 50 notification, not the negotiation/“meaningful vote”. The need for a vote came from Dominic Grieve last year, I think?

    yes she did art 50

    meaningful vote self-inflicted by may after pressure

    3fpohw4n01yj.png
  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck lonely, but not unloved dreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered User regular
    Re malthouse compromise



    (Reporter in Brussels)

    wowee what a surprise

    3fpohw4n01yj.png
  • JazzJazz Registered User regular
    I'm amazed (not really) it got this far

  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck lonely, but not unloved dreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered User regular
    sounds like May might have got some minor last minute fiddle to backstop. erg angry. thus the cycle of Brexit continues

    3fpohw4n01yj.png
  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck lonely, but not unloved dreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered User regular
    edited February 2019


    eu commission press office, retweeted by selmayr, seems fairly voice of godish

    also gove announcing tariffs on agricultural goods to protect uk agriculture is finger kissingly perfect

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/feb/19/brexit-uk-will-apply-food-tariffs-in-case-of-no-deal-michael-gove-says

    for those wondering

    surrealitycheck on
    3fpohw4n01yj.png
  • japanjapan Registered User regular
    So this is interesting

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/feb/18/ministers-tell-may-stop-using-no-deal-threat-as-negotiating-tactic

    I would really love to know more about how they know this, because the implication is that one of the ministers involved has spoken off the record about said meeting

  • surrealitychecksurrealitycheck lonely, but not unloved dreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered User regular
    japan wrote: »
    So this is interesting

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/feb/18/ministers-tell-may-stop-using-no-deal-threat-as-negotiating-tactic

    I would really love to know more about how they know this, because the implication is that one of the ministers involved has spoken off the record about said meeting

    telegraph got it 8pm last night but most ministers have been leaking like mad because may is so bad at communication

    3fpohw4n01yj.png
This discussion has been closed.