The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
There's this movie out called "Us." It's by Jordan Peele. He did Get Out. It was pretty good and like won some awards or whatever.
Us is also supposed to be pretty good. I dunno, I haven't seen it.
Have you seen it? Cool, talk about that.
For the time being, please TAG ALL SPOILERS. Down the road, we'll open things up, but for now, please keep things tagged.
OPEN SPOILERS WOOOOOO
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
"Us" has a great creep factor, but I found it's story to be implausible and vague in some parts.
Yeah it’s not nearly as complete and straightforward as Get Out. Judging from the reaction in my theater it didn’t go over well. A lot of weirdly timed laughter and a lot of “the fuck” when the credits rolled. I enjoyed it, but I get the issues.
What popped into my head when watching it was that these people where from a parallel world. That would have worked much better than what they did.
"Us" has a great creep factor, but I found it's story to be implausible and vague in some parts.
I think trying to poke holes in the logistics and practicality of movies that don't claim to be realistic is a silly pursuit. Its like claiming Aesop's Fables don't make any zoological sense.
Get Out has a plausibility to it. You can look back at the story and see how everything fits together. I was hoping that writing style would carry over to this film. It makes the horror so much better.
one thing i didn't mention in the movie thread is the score is fantastic
apparently universal put some of it on their official youtube in case you were fiending for that intro song like I was
to rehash my thoughts, really good, jordan peele is a virtuoso, only really have an issue with two things
I didn't like the long explanation speech in terms of it overexplaining stuff, you could have kept it vague / unexplained and my tastes would have preferred it.
i think a lot of people didn't like the twist and I also wasn't a fan of it. it felt unnecessary, like it was there to hammer home the message and thematics but it kinda scuffed the plot. I think part of the reason it is the script is otherwise so tight and the film does a wonderful job of setup, payoff, having everything work believably, but the twist stretches into the unbelievable (although the film does an admirable job of setting it up). It felt like the characters were acting around information they had to keep the audience in the dark, or you have to kinda just accept that they don't remember information for reasons.
Maybe on rewatch with a closer eye I'll catch some more setup for the reveal and it'll change how I feel. Still loved it though and it definitely confirms for me that Jordan Peele is a director whose movies I Will Watch.
Its honestly a little odd to me that one might say a movie where a community of white people are splicing brain bits into the bodies of black people to take over their bodies makes rational sense but this one didn't.
I think whether the lab underground could have happened or is plausible is besides the point. Could there be 10s of millions of people surviving in secret labs? Nope! I mean Adelaide took a well lit escalator into an immaculately kept endless hallway of lunatics
That’s just not the point of the movie. You’re supposed to accept it like you accept fantastical elements in other movies - this is not our planet, it’s a planet where the government did semi-mystical research on millions of people underground, and the rules work differently as a result
It’s like when people complained about how the alien invasion was implausible in Quiet Place. That wasn’t the point of the movie, the point of that movie was there’s aliens now, here’s how this family deals with it
A movie where they stopped to explain this and that about the aliens would have been a slower and worse movie, probably
The guy getting carried away in the ambulance at the beginning was the 11:11 sign guy, who had just been murdered by his tether, who got started early
He put on his coat and was the first to arrive in the human chain, dripping blood from the murder
i thought that was the case but i wasn't completely sure.
i don't think you see his face holding hands in the human chain? but you do see him with the coat in the same spot where he was holding out hands earlier when jason spotted him
I saw Get Out and Us at pretty full theaters in Atlanta both on opening weekend.
The full crowd experience definitely adds to the experience for movies like these. Instead of being annoyed at people talking, it's now a feature. I thought Us was fantastic.
One noticeable difference in crowd reaction:
The end of Get Out had people whooping and hollering. The end of Us had a lot of people seeming very uncomfortable. I mean, I was right there with them, but it was a drastic difference.
The guy getting carried away in the ambulance at the beginning was the 11:11 sign guy, who had just been murdered by his tether, who got started early
He put on his coat and was the first to arrive in the human chain, dripping blood from the murder
i thought that was the case but i wasn't completely sure.
i don't think you see his face holding hands in the human chain? but you do see him with the coat in the same spot where he was holding out hands earlier when jason spotted him
You do see him. He has 1111 carved in his forehead and the camera pans across him at one point in the Hands Across America chain.
Hands Across America in a long time. What a dumb idea. I wonder how many people watched the movie wondering if that was real.
It is exactly the kind of statement that a young child would think is profound and meaningful, if they were buried away for 33 years with no outside contact
I saw Get Out and Us at pretty full theaters in Atlanta both on opening weekend.
The full crowd experience definitely adds to the experience for movies like these. Instead of being annoyed at people talking, it's now a feature. I thought Us was fantastic.
One noticeable difference in crowd reaction:
The end of Get Out had people whooping and hollering. The end of Us had a lot of people seeming very uncomfortable. I mean, I was right there with them, but it was a drastic difference.
Can't wait to see what Peele does next.
yeah it's not exactly a triumphant moment especially compared to get out
This movie didn't work for me as well as get out did. At the end I felt myself wondering what it was all about and needing someone to spell it out what the message was suppose to be. It felt like there were just too many elements for me to follow coherently.
This movie didn't work for me as well as get out did. At the end I felt myself wondering what it was all about and needing someone to spell it out what the message was suppose to be. It felt like there were just too many elements for me to follow coherently.
Yeah, I was wondering this, too.
It strangely reminded me of recent debates I've seen online regarding "always chaotic evil" races in Dungeons & Dragons and the morality of fighting them, or of even featuring them at all.
The Tethered were evil, but they were also criminally insane, twisted by a bizarre bond with their counterparts, and grew up in horrible conditions while their counterparts had comparatively much better lives.
Hexmage-PA on
+1
KoopahTroopahThe koopas, the troopas.Philadelphia, PARegistered Userregular
edited March 2019
I think where Get Out deals specifically with race and is pretty straight forward about it, Us deals with priviledge and it is way more subtle than Get Out is. So much so that the
big twist with Red being Adelaide and vice versa
barely even made a dent with me. I was like, "okay, so? That doesn't change anything." But the more I thought about it, the more it mattered as a whole.
I think where Get Out has a better concept and punch, Us is the better made movie. The pacing is really strong, its concept is incredibly interesting, the shots and call backs (tons of reoccurring themes and homages), it's just really good. I didn't really want to watch Get Out again after theaters, I 100% want to watch Us atleast once more.
This movie didn't work for me as well as get out did. At the end I felt myself wondering what it was all about and needing someone to spell it out what the message was suppose to be. It felt like there were just too many elements for me to follow coherently.
Yeah, I was wondering this, too.
It strangely reminded me of recent debates I've seen online regarding "always chaotic evil" races in Dungeons & Dragons and the morality of fighting them, or of even featuring them at all.
The Tethered were evil, but they were also criminally insane, twisted by a bizarre bond with their counterparts, and grew up in horrible conditions while their counterparts had comparatively much better lives.
Seems like the new Adelaide is us - living in comfort and happiness having stolen the life and identity of those that came before, who now, so reasonably and insanely vengeful, wish to reclaim what's rightfully theirs. Who is the evil one in this scenario?
Marty: The future, it's where you're going? Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
This movie didn't work for me as well as get out did. At the end I felt myself wondering what it was all about and needing someone to spell it out what the message was suppose to be. It felt like there were just too many elements for me to follow coherently.
Yeah, I was wondering this, too.
It strangely reminded me of recent debates I've seen online regarding "always chaotic evil" races in Dungeons & Dragons and the morality of fighting them, or of even featuring them at all.
The Tethered were evil, but they were also criminally insane, twisted by a bizarre bond with their counterparts, and grew up in horrible conditions while their counterparts had comparatively much better lives.
Seems like the new Adelaide is us - living in comfort and happiness having stolen the life and identity of those that came before, who now, so reasonably and insanely vengeful, wish to reclaim what's rightfully theirs. Who is the evil one in this scenario?
Personally I'm pretty comfortable in saying the Tethered and their leader were in the wrong. They came out of nowhere to kill people that had no idea the Tethered even existed without trying any nonviolent solution.
This movie didn't work for me as well as get out did. At the end I felt myself wondering what it was all about and needing someone to spell it out what the message was suppose to be. It felt like there were just too many elements for me to follow coherently.
Yeah, I was wondering this, too.
It strangely reminded me of recent debates I've seen online regarding "always chaotic evil" races in Dungeons & Dragons and the morality of fighting them, or of even featuring them at all.
The Tethered were evil, but they were also criminally insane, twisted by a bizarre bond with their counterparts, and grew up in horrible conditions while their counterparts had comparatively much better lives.
Seems like the new Adelaide is us - living in comfort and happiness having stolen the life and identity of those that came before, who now, so reasonably and insanely vengeful, wish to reclaim what's rightfully theirs. Who is the evil one in this scenario?
Personally I'm pretty comfortable in saying the Tethered and their leader were in the wrong. They came out of nowhere to kill people that had no idea the Tethered even existed without trying any nonviolent solution.
Yeah, that's one way in which the whole thing kinda breaks down.
If we take this as a metaphor for class struggle, that complete ignorance matters. I know that poor people here in America do the work to make my life more comfortable. I know that poor people in China make my iPhone. I put it out of my mind, I do what little I can to correct the situation (which is little to nothing), but I'm definitely aware at some level. Whereas the people the Tethered kill have no idea whatsoever the Tethered ever existed. But of course no metaphor is perfect.
Perhaps you're more aware than average, but its not necessary for the upper class to be literally unaware of the working class's existence for the metaphor to do its thing.
This movie didn't work for me as well as get out did. At the end I felt myself wondering what it was all about and needing someone to spell it out what the message was suppose to be. It felt like there were just too many elements for me to follow coherently.
Yeah, I was wondering this, too.
It strangely reminded me of recent debates I've seen online regarding "always chaotic evil" races in Dungeons & Dragons and the morality of fighting them, or of even featuring them at all.
The Tethered were evil, but they were also criminally insane, twisted by a bizarre bond with their counterparts, and grew up in horrible conditions while their counterparts had comparatively much better lives.
Seems like the new Adelaide is us - living in comfort and happiness having stolen the life and identity of those that came before, who now, so reasonably and insanely vengeful, wish to reclaim what's rightfully theirs. Who is the evil one in this scenario?
Personally I'm pretty comfortable in saying the Tethered and their leader were in the wrong. They came out of nowhere to kill people that had no idea the Tethered even existed without trying any nonviolent solution.
Yeah, that's one way in which the whole thing kinda breaks down.
If we take this as a metaphor for class struggle, that complete ignorance matters. I know that poor people here in America do the work to make my life more comfortable. I know that poor people in China make my iPhone. I put it out of my mind, I do what little I can to correct the situation (which is little to nothing), but I'm definitely aware at some level. Whereas the people the Tethered kill have no idea whatsoever the Tethered ever existed. But of course no metaphor is perfect.
Perhaps you're more aware than average, but its not necessary for the upper class to be literally unaware of the working class's existence for the metaphor to do its thing.
Runs well with Jeremiah 11:10, right before 11:11 - "They are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods to serve them: the house of Israel and the house of Judah have broken my covenant which I made with their fathers."
We are beholden to the sins of our ancestors, and we will pay for lessons unlearned and promises broken.
Note: also interesting in that the passage makes reference to the Two House Theology of Israel and Judah
Paladin on
Marty: The future, it's where you're going? Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
I just got out and I’m still gathering my thoughts but my initial impression was that the runtime needed to be either 20 minutes shorter or 20 minutes longer.
“I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
0
AkimboEGMr. FancypantsWears very fine pants indeedRegistered Userregular
Final few moments
Though I think the movie would work equally well without the final twist, I appreciate the symbolism of the escalator. That one shot with young Red looking up pretty much encapsulates the metaphor.
Give me a kiss to build a dream on; And my imagination will thrive upon that kiss; Sweetheart, I ask no more than this; A kiss to build a dream on
All right so here’s some more thoughts on the whole movie
The twist didn’t do anything for me. It made me go “...huh” and move on. I don’t know that it was even all that necessary. Our protagonist turns out to be the cuckoo, and Red was originally the girl who lived in the light.
Ok. So what? It explains why she didnt talk when they found her, she didn’t know how. It explains why she’s so against ever returning to Santa Cruz, because that’s where she escaped from.
It also explains why Red is so driven. She’s the one person in the film who has any idea what’s going on, but she can’t adequately explain it because she’s been living in a subterranean madhouse for the last ~27 years. And not only has she nearly forgotten how to speak in anything other than shrieks and moans, she’s concocted the following plan:
1. Dress all the crazy doppelgängers up like they’re Michael in the Thriller video.
2. Kill everyone they can find
3. Hold hands
4. ?????
5. Profit
Just...what is the point of all this? What’s the metaphor? Why do the doppelgangers exist? How are they connected to each other? Who made them? I realize I’m not supposed to ask these questions, I’m just supposed to be awestruck by the fancy camerawork and the attention to detail in the set decorations. But I can’t help it. The answers we were eventually given were disappointing and confusing, and just raised more substantive questions.
Anyway, that’s the stuff I didn’t like so much. What I did like: the cinematography, the music, the editing, and the performances. There was something that spoke to me about Winston Duke being allowed to be a goofy and corny dad on camera when he’d ordinarily be relegated to a silent background muscle role or the truculent gangster from Person of Interest.
And maybe that’s what this movie really is valuable for: showing a functional black middle class family who when you get down to it is not terribly different from the white middle class family we’re also shown.
“I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
All right so here’s some more thoughts on the whole movie
The twist didn’t do anything for me. It made me go “...huh” and move on. I don’t know that it was even all that necessary. Our protagonist turns out to be the cuckoo, and Red was originally the girl who lived in the light.
Ok. So what? It explains why she didnt talk when they found her, she didn’t know how. It explains why she’s so against ever returning to Santa Cruz, because that’s where she escaped from.
It also explains why Red is so driven. She’s the one person in the film who has any idea what’s going on, but she can’t adequately explain it because she’s been living in a subterranean madhouse for the last ~27 years. And not only has she nearly forgotten how to speak in anything other than shrieks and moans, she’s concocted the following plan:
1. Dress all the crazy doppelgängers up like they’re Michael in the Thriller video.
2. Kill everyone they can find
3. Hold hands
4. ?????
5. Profit
Just...what is the point of all this? What’s the metaphor? Why do the doppelgangers exist? How are they connected to each other? Who made them? I realize I’m not supposed to ask these questions, I’m just supposed to be awestruck by the fancy camerawork and the attention to detail in the set decorations. But I can’t help it. The answers we were eventually given were disappointing and confusing, and just raised more substantive questions.
Anyway, that’s the stuff I didn’t like so much. What I did like: the cinematography, the music, the editing, and the performances. There was something that spoke to me about Winston Duke being allowed to be a goofy and corny dad on camera when he’d ordinarily be relegated to a silent background muscle role or the truculent gangster from Person of Interest.
And maybe that’s what this movie really is valuable for: showing a functional black middle class family who when you get down to it is not terribly different from the white middle class family we’re also shown.
Its a class metaphor. There's a lower class no different than those above that toils in misery and poverty while others, through no virtue of their own, live in comfort, unaware of the labor performed beneath their feet.
The twist at the end is important for driving this home. They ended up switching places through, as she describes it "an act of God", special only in circumstance. The entire system is equally irrational and unjust. Like any social uprising, its bloody and both simultaneously deeply personal for the revolutionaries and consciously fueled by impersonal injustice.
People get too hung up on the details, like the government plot. That's all just window dressing.
what labor? It’s a bunch of inbred crazy people eating laboratory bunnies to survive. The metaphor falls apart so completely I’m not even sure it’s actually a metaphor.
And if it’s all about a class struggle, then it’s a scathing indictment of the concept of revolution. Woohoo, everyone on the surface is dead and the Reds got to hold hands in a meaningless gesture, now what? Do you think a society based on the power of stabbing people in the face with scissors has any chance of surviving more than a few months?
knitdan on
“I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
what labor? It’s a bunch of inbred crazy people eating laboratory bunnies to survive. The metaphor falls apart so completely I’m not even sure it’s actually a metaphor.
And if it’s all about a class struggle, then it’s a scathing indictment of the concept of revolution. Woohoo, everyone on the surface is dead and the Reds got to hold hands in a meaningless gesture, now what? Do you think a society based on the power of stabbing people in the face with scissors has any chance of surviving more than a few months?
Every night they have to perform exhausting physical activity from which they derive no pleasure. The scene in the tunnel with the macabre version of the board walk is the pointless miserable labor that millions perform every day. Of course their labor isn't actually useful, but neither is the labor many of us are forced into.
Its not an indictment of revolution, its just realizes that injustice breeds bloodshed. You'll hear more than one person say that there's no innocence in an unjust system. Think of it like the French Revolution. Did the population have just cause to revolt? Yuuuuup. Did they kill a lot of innocent people? Yuuuuup. Peele isn't condemning or condoning, he's putting the cycle of violence that a class based society breeds on a screen in lurid colors.
I think @Styrofoam Sammich hit the nail on the head for me. I got caught on trying to figure out how the world works. Focusing on details rather than the story Peele was trying to tell.
This movie didn't work for me as well as get out did. At the end I felt myself wondering what it was all about and needing someone to spell it out what the message was suppose to be. It felt like there were just too many elements for me to follow coherently.
Yeah, I was wondering this, too.
It strangely reminded me of recent debates I've seen online regarding "always chaotic evil" races in Dungeons & Dragons and the morality of fighting them, or of even featuring them at all.
The Tethered were evil, but they were also criminally insane, twisted by a bizarre bond with their counterparts, and grew up in horrible conditions while their counterparts had comparatively much better lives.
Seems like the new Adelaide is us - living in comfort and happiness having stolen the life and identity of those that came before, who now, so reasonably and insanely vengeful, wish to reclaim what's rightfully theirs. Who is the evil one in this scenario?
Personally I'm pretty comfortable in saying the Tethered and their leader were in the wrong. They came out of nowhere to kill people that had no idea the Tethered even existed without trying any nonviolent solution.
Yeah, that's one way in which the whole thing kinda breaks down.
If we take this as a metaphor for class struggle, that complete ignorance matters. I know that poor people here in America do the work to make my life more comfortable. I know that poor people in China make my iPhone. I put it out of my mind, I do what little I can to correct the situation (which is little to nothing), but I'm definitely aware at some level. Whereas the people the Tethered kill have no idea whatsoever the Tethered ever existed. But of course no metaphor is perfect.
If the point of the “untethering” was to kill their alternate, why didn’t the mom kill hers the several opportunities she had to do so?
Especially at the end, when they were fighting in the hall and she kept dancing and seemingly toying with her double. She could have easily killed her multiple times and just didn’t.
If the point of the “untethering” was to kill their alternate, why didn’t the mom kill hers the several opportunities she had to do so?
Especially at the end, when they were fighting in the hall and she kept dancing and seemingly toying with her double. She could have easily killed her multiple times and just didn’t.
She’s
insane, and said she’s been waiting a long time for this and wants to make it last
Posts
I think trying to poke holes in the logistics and practicality of movies that don't claim to be realistic is a silly pursuit. Its like claiming Aesop's Fables don't make any zoological sense.
apparently universal put some of it on their official youtube in case you were fiending for that intro song like I was
to rehash my thoughts, really good, jordan peele is a virtuoso, only really have an issue with two things
i think a lot of people didn't like the twist and I also wasn't a fan of it. it felt unnecessary, like it was there to hammer home the message and thematics but it kinda scuffed the plot. I think part of the reason it is the script is otherwise so tight and the film does a wonderful job of setup, payoff, having everything work believably, but the twist stretches into the unbelievable (although the film does an admirable job of setting it up). It felt like the characters were acting around information they had to keep the audience in the dark, or you have to kinda just accept that they don't remember information for reasons.
Maybe on rewatch with a closer eye I'll catch some more setup for the reveal and it'll change how I feel. Still loved it though and it definitely confirms for me that Jordan Peele is a director whose movies I Will Watch.
That’s just not the point of the movie. You’re supposed to accept it like you accept fantastical elements in other movies - this is not our planet, it’s a planet where the government did semi-mystical research on millions of people underground, and the rules work differently as a result
It’s like when people complained about how the alien invasion was implausible in Quiet Place. That wasn’t the point of the movie, the point of that movie was there’s aliens now, here’s how this family deals with it
A movie where they stopped to explain this and that about the aliens would have been a slower and worse movie, probably
He put on his coat and was the first to arrive in the human chain, dripping blood from the murder
The full crowd experience definitely adds to the experience for movies like these. Instead of being annoyed at people talking, it's now a feature. I thought Us was fantastic.
One noticeable difference in crowd reaction:
Can't wait to see what Peele does next.
It is exactly the kind of statement that a young child would think is profound and meaningful, if they were buried away for 33 years with no outside contact
yeah it's not exactly a triumphant moment especially compared to get out
Still, very good movie, very fun at parts, extremely harrowing at others.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
specifically i was reminded of
Yeah, I was wondering this, too.
It strangely reminded me of recent debates I've seen online regarding "always chaotic evil" races in Dungeons & Dragons and the morality of fighting them, or of even featuring them at all.
I think where Get Out has a better concept and punch, Us is the better made movie. The pacing is really strong, its concept is incredibly interesting, the shots and call backs (tons of reoccurring themes and homages), it's just really good. I didn't really want to watch Get Out again after theaters, I 100% want to watch Us atleast once more.
Twitch: KoopahTroopah - Steam: Koopah
Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
Perhaps you're more aware than average, but its not necessary for the upper class to be literally unaware of the working class's existence for the metaphor to do its thing.
We are beholden to the sins of our ancestors, and we will pay for lessons unlearned and promises broken.
Note: also interesting in that the passage makes reference to the Two House Theology of Israel and Judah
Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
Ok. So what? It explains why she didnt talk when they found her, she didn’t know how. It explains why she’s so against ever returning to Santa Cruz, because that’s where she escaped from.
It also explains why Red is so driven. She’s the one person in the film who has any idea what’s going on, but she can’t adequately explain it because she’s been living in a subterranean madhouse for the last ~27 years. And not only has she nearly forgotten how to speak in anything other than shrieks and moans, she’s concocted the following plan:
1. Dress all the crazy doppelgängers up like they’re Michael in the Thriller video.
2. Kill everyone they can find
3. Hold hands
4. ?????
5. Profit
Just...what is the point of all this? What’s the metaphor? Why do the doppelgangers exist? How are they connected to each other? Who made them? I realize I’m not supposed to ask these questions, I’m just supposed to be awestruck by the fancy camerawork and the attention to detail in the set decorations. But I can’t help it. The answers we were eventually given were disappointing and confusing, and just raised more substantive questions.
Anyway, that’s the stuff I didn’t like so much. What I did like: the cinematography, the music, the editing, and the performances. There was something that spoke to me about Winston Duke being allowed to be a goofy and corny dad on camera when he’d ordinarily be relegated to a silent background muscle role or the truculent gangster from Person of Interest.
And maybe that’s what this movie really is valuable for: showing a functional black middle class family who when you get down to it is not terribly different from the white middle class family we’re also shown.
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
The twist at the end is important for driving this home. They ended up switching places through, as she describes it "an act of God", special only in circumstance. The entire system is equally irrational and unjust. Like any social uprising, its bloody and both simultaneously deeply personal for the revolutionaries and consciously fueled by impersonal injustice.
People get too hung up on the details, like the government plot. That's all just window dressing.
And if it’s all about a class struggle, then it’s a scathing indictment of the concept of revolution. Woohoo, everyone on the surface is dead and the Reds got to hold hands in a meaningless gesture, now what? Do you think a society based on the power of stabbing people in the face with scissors has any chance of surviving more than a few months?
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
Its not an indictment of revolution, its just realizes that injustice breeds bloodshed. You'll hear more than one person say that there's no innocence in an unjust system. Think of it like the French Revolution. Did the population have just cause to revolt? Yuuuuup. Did they kill a lot of innocent people? Yuuuuup. Peele isn't condemning or condoning, he's putting the cycle of violence that a class based society breeds on a screen in lurid colors.
Adelaide Knew tho.
Especially at the end, when they were fighting in the hall and she kept dancing and seemingly toying with her double. She could have easily killed her multiple times and just didn’t.
She’s