The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Julian Assange Arrested in London

joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class TraitorSmoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
Just like it says on the tin.

According to the article:
Mr. Assange, 47, has been living at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since 2012. British authorities arrested him after he was evicted by the Ecuadoreans. The Metropolitan Police said that Mr. Assange had been detained partly in connection with an extradition warrant filed by the authorities in the United States.

Assange is also wanted in Sweden in connection to rape/molestation charges. Also, two women independently have come forward to ask that he be tested for STDs.

So it looks like a lot of chickens are coming home to roost for Assange.



Ruptly is an international news video agency

Obviously this is going to have big implications not only for international diplomacy, but on issues related to domestic interference in elections.

Ecuador finally withdrew their support for Assange after their relationship became increasingly strained. Not only did Assange continue to involve himself in state affairs, both Ecuadorian and otherwise, but he also failed to clean his own toilet and cat's litterbox, to the point where they actually shut off his internet earlier this year in an effort to get him to quit being the world's worst roommate.

Things you should not do
  • Use this thread as a proxy for liberal vs. moderate Democrat flame wars
  • Post about the Mueller investigation; that thread is over there. However, Assange's involvement in publishing DNC emails is fair game
  • Make this into a cybersecurity thread except as it relates to the accusations leveled at Assange

You happy Assange is finally facing the music? Personally I think he's a scumbag of the highest order.

«13456728

Posts

  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    About fucking time.

    sig.gif
  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    I'm kind of :? given the specific charges it looks like he's facing, sounds like it's designed to minimise the opportunity to shed light on said DNC hacks.

    And the boot at Obama for not doing this sooner sheds further light on the motive. On the whole I'd be happier if he was just going to Sweden.

  • Martini_PhilosopherMartini_Philosopher Registered User regular
    Just like it says on the tin.

    You happy Assange is finally facing the music? Personally I think he's a scumbag of the highest order.

    I guess it depends on which song is being played. I'm totally on board with him being taken back Sweden and forced to face that problem as he should have in the first place.
    I'm less enthused about some sort of espionage charges related to the Chelsea Manning business.
    If it's about the DNC emails, I'm down to boogie.

    All opinions are my own and in no way reflect that of my employer.
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    Just like it says on the tin.

    You happy Assange is finally facing the music? Personally I think he's a scumbag of the highest order.

    I guess it depends on which song is being played. I'm totally on board with him being taken back Sweden and forced to face that problem as he should have in the first place.
    I'm less enthused about some sort of espionage charges related to the Chelsea Manning business.
    If it's about the DNC emails, I'm down to boogie.

    Chelsea Manning business is damage done, let's move on

    DNC emails directly led to president Trump and Assange is clearly in Russia's pocket, Wikileaks itself has been transparently pro-Russia for some time now and if nothing else I'm happy to see its founder arrested

  • DoobhDoobh She/Her, Ace Pan/Bisexual 8-) What's up, bootlickers?Registered User regular
    Cool, can the U.S. release Chelsea Manning now?

    Miss me? Find me on:

    Twitch (I stream most days of the week)
    Twitter (mean leftist discourse)
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    I'm kind of :? given the specific charges it looks like he's facing, sounds like it's designed to minimise the opportunity to shed light on said DNC hacks.

    And the boot at Obama for not doing this sooner sheds further light on the motive. On the whole I'd be happier if he was just going to Sweden.

    His earlier leaks are a load of hot bullshit too, so going down for that shit is not a huge problem.

    Let's all remember that fucking Colbert of all people nailed his ass for the game he's been playing back in fucking 2010.
    (had a hard time finding a good transcript link, so this will do for now)
    https://gawker.com/5515720/stephen-colbert-grills-wikileaks-founder-on-helicopter-video
    One constant criticism of Wikileaks' helicopter video has been that its heavy editorial slant clashed with the supposed objectivity of the material they presented. Colbert challenged Assange on this point: "You have edited this tape, and you have given it a title called 'collateral murder.' That's not leaking, that's a pure editorial." Assange responded that Wikileaks promises their sources that they will "try and get the maximum possible political impact for the material the give us."

    Wikileaks was always nothing more then a way for Assange to go after his political enemies.

  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    Just like it says on the tin.

    You happy Assange is finally facing the music? Personally I think he's a scumbag of the highest order.

    I guess it depends on which song is being played. I'm totally on board with him being taken back Sweden and forced to face that problem as he should have in the first place.
    I'm less enthused about some sort of espionage charges related to the Chelsea Manning business.
    If it's about the DNC emails, I'm down to boogie.

    Chelsea Manning business is damage done, let's move on

    DNC emails directly led to president Trump and Assange is clearly in Russia's pocket, Wikileaks itself has been transparently pro-Russia for some time now and if nothing else I'm happy to see its founder arrested

    Problem is I wouldn't be surprised if the US makes absolutely no inquiries about the DNC and just sends him down for Manning.

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Doobh wrote: »
    Cool, can the U.S. release Chelsea Manning now?

    She's back in jail for what seems like pretty good reasons:
    Manning has been jailed in Virginia since March 8 for refusing to answer a federal grand jury’s questions about her association with WikiLeaks—though not entirely out of loyalty to WikiLeaks or Assange himself. Manning and her supporters say she opposes the use of grand juries on principle, calling them a “secretive and oppressive process” that has been used “historically to entrap and persecute activists for protected political speech.”
    https://gizmodo.com/chelsea-mannings-fbi-files-are-central-to-ongoing-crimi-1833897041

  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    Doobh wrote: »
    Cool, can the U.S. release Chelsea Manning now?

    Yes please, the punishment does not make any sense given it is literally impossible for her to do anything similar ever again

    Assange on the other hand is probably a rapist and just all-around world-class asshole and has had this coming for a long while now

  • iguanacusiguanacus Desert PlanetRegistered User regular
    edited April 2019
    Doobh wrote: »
    Cool, can the U.S. release Chelsea Manning now?

    She's been out for almost 2 years now.

    *EDIT*

    Oh, didn't realize she was back in jail. Not answering a Grand Jury is a whole other ball of wax from what she did before.

    iguanacus on
  • DoobhDoobh She/Her, Ace Pan/Bisexual 8-) What's up, bootlickers?Registered User regular
    iguanacus wrote: »
    Doobh wrote: »
    Cool, can the U.S. release Chelsea Manning now?

    She's been out for almost 2 years now.

    Grand Jury imprisoned her for contempt of court because she refused to testify in front of a secret (and highly fucking unconstitutional) secret jury back in March

    Miss me? Find me on:

    Twitch (I stream most days of the week)
    Twitter (mean leftist discourse)
  • DoobhDoobh She/Her, Ace Pan/Bisexual 8-) What's up, bootlickers?Registered User regular
    My stance on Assange, to paraphrase one of my friends, is that Julian Assange, the U.S., and the U.K. all suck shit

    I feel like that covers all my bases

    Miss me? Find me on:

    Twitch (I stream most days of the week)
    Twitter (mean leftist discourse)
  • syndalissyndalis Getting Classy On the WallRegistered User, Loves Apple Products, Transition Team regular
    67bjddzoeps6.png

    Riffing on Bogart's mod post in the UK thread, he DOES in fact look like how one would cast Geralt of Rivia in a porn parody.

    SW-4158-3990-6116
    Let's play Mario Kart or something...
  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    edited April 2019
    Mazzyx on
    u7stthr17eud.png
  • SolventSolvent Econ-artist กรุงเทพมหานครRegistered User regular
    So tell me if I'm misremembering though, but weren't there a bunch of people in high places saying "Of course Assange won't be extradited to the US, this is all about Sweden and rape." I'm pretty sure my brain didn't make that up but this goes back a long time now and it's not like I've been following it all that closely.

    I don't know where he got the scorpions, or how he got them into my mattress.

    http://newnations.bandcamp.com
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Doobh wrote: »
    iguanacus wrote: »
    Doobh wrote: »
    Cool, can the U.S. release Chelsea Manning now?

    She's been out for almost 2 years now.

    Grand Jury imprisoned her for contempt of court because she refused to testify in front of a secret (and highly fucking unconstitutional) secret jury back in March

    As far as any article I've seen, it was just a normal perfectly-constitutional grand jury.

  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    Solvent wrote: »
    So tell me if I'm misremembering though, but weren't there a bunch of people in high places saying "Of course Assange won't be extradited to the US, this is all about Sweden and rape." I'm pretty sure my brain didn't make that up but this goes back a long time now and it's not like I've been following it all that closely.

    There were no unsealed indictments. And general policy is don't talk about indictments that are not unsealed. And also by the date this indictment by grand jury was March this year. Though my guess the investigation went longer.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    Mazzyx wrote: »

    And there's already a push to argue that this will harm freedom of the press.

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • a5ehrena5ehren AtlantaRegistered User regular
    Solvent wrote: »
    So tell me if I'm misremembering though, but weren't there a bunch of people in high places saying "Of course Assange won't be extradited to the US, this is all about Sweden and rape." I'm pretty sure my brain didn't make that up but this goes back a long time now and it's not like I've been following it all that closely.

    I think Sweden said they wouldn't extradite if the US asked, but this is a UK action. I don't remember the various positions the US government has had over the years.

  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    Mazzyx wrote: »

    And there's already a push to argue that this will harm freedom of the press.

    This isn't a new argument. In fact this has been the argument of Assange's lawyer for a few years. It goes like this:

    1)Wikileaks is an actual news site and its release of classified information is in the same sense as need to know like say The Pentagon Papers.
    2)Any action taken against Assange or Wikileaks is an attack on the press and thus abridges the first amendment.
    3)Because of this no action can or should be taken.

    I think this is why the indictment is so narrow and focused on cracking a hashed password not on distribution of classified materials.

    Also it requires the argument to be true that Wikileaks is a legitimate news website which is highly questionable to me.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Solvent wrote: »
    So tell me if I'm misremembering though, but weren't there a bunch of people in high places saying "Of course Assange won't be extradited to the US, this is all about Sweden and rape." I'm pretty sure my brain didn't make that up but this goes back a long time now and it's not like I've been following it all that closely.

    Obama wasn't doing anything about the issue. Sessions made it a priority once he took office. That probably covers what you are thinking of here.

  • ElldrenElldren Is a woman dammit ceterum censeoRegistered User regular
    Solvent wrote: »
    So tell me if I'm misremembering though, but weren't there a bunch of people in high places saying "Of course Assange won't be extradited to the US, this is all about Sweden and rape." I'm pretty sure my brain didn't make that up but this goes back a long time now and it's not like I've been following it all that closely.

    That was 7 years and an entire presidency ago.

    I personally would still prefer he be extradited to Sweden

    fuck gendered marketing
  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    Also I guess the UK does get first crack at Assange as he skipped bail and there is a warrant on him for that.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    Solvent wrote: »
    So tell me if I'm misremembering though, but weren't there a bunch of people in high places saying "Of course Assange won't be extradited to the US, this is all about Sweden and rape." I'm pretty sure my brain didn't make that up but this goes back a long time now and it's not like I've been following it all that closely.

    Oddly if he'd gone to Sweden to start with he'd be safer. It's harder to extradite from there.

  • Descendant XDescendant X Skyrim is my god now. Outpost 31Registered User regular
    It sure was nice to see how uncooperative he was while being dragged out of the embassy. Always good to start the day with a smidgen of schadenfreude.

    Garry: I know you gentlemen have been through a lot, but when you find the time I'd rather not spend the rest of the winter TIED TO THIS FUCKING COUCH!
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    Mazzyx wrote: »
    Mazzyx wrote: »

    And there's already a push to argue that this will harm freedom of the press.

    This isn't a new argument. In fact this has been the argument of Assange's lawyer for a few years. It goes like this:

    1)Wikileaks is an actual news site and its release of classified information is in the same sense as need to know like say The Pentagon Papers.
    2)Any action taken against Assange or Wikileaks is an attack on the press and thus abridges the first amendment.
    3)Because of this no action can or should be taken.

    I think this is why the indictment is so narrow and focused on cracking a hashed password not on distribution of classified materials.

    Also it requires the argument to be true that Wikileaks is a legitimate news website which is highly questionable to me.

    People forget that the reason Daniel Ellsberg is a free man today is because the feds fucked up his case so badly as to fatally damage it,and not because his actions were somehow protected. Journalists who aid and abet crimes are engaging in criminal activity that they can be prosecuted for.

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • HamHamJHamHamJ Registered User regular
    The way we treat whistle blowers is deeply concerning to me and while the DNC hack has some merit I think if this really does turn into the US making an example of him instead of dealing with the more serious issue of his rape alligations I think that while be hugely unfortunate and retroactively prove all his paranoid ranting.

    While racing light mechs, your Urbanmech comes in second place, but only because it ran out of ammo.
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    HamHamJ wrote: »
    The way we treat whistle blowers is deeply concerning to me and while the DNC hack has some merit I think if this really does turn into the US making an example of him instead of dealing with the more serious issue of his rape alligations I think that while be hugely unfortunate and retroactively prove all his paranoid ranting.

    Assange was never a whistleblower, but a political actor - this is the point Colbert was making when he dropped kayfabe to tear into him.

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    HamHamJ wrote: »
    The way we treat whistle blowers is deeply concerning to me and while the DNC hack has some merit I think if this really does turn into the US making an example of him instead of dealing with the more serious issue of his rape alligations I think that while be hugely unfortunate and retroactively prove all his paranoid ranting.

    Maybe he shouldn't have worked to Trump elected via illegal actions then. They are the ones that basically reopen the attempts to get him extradited. The previous admin was basically leaving him alone.

  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Jesus jumped up Christ Twitter is a mess over this this morning. Edward Snowden is calling this a "freedom of the press" issue, ignoring that Assange was not operating out of the interest of the press and instead at the behest of one nation to attack another. That's not being a member of the press, that's being a spy.

  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    HamHamJ wrote: »
    The way we treat whistle blowers is deeply concerning to me and while the DNC hack has some merit I think if this really does turn into the US making an example of him instead of dealing with the more serious issue of his rape alligations I think that while be hugely unfortunate and retroactively prove all his paranoid ranting.

    Assange was never a whistleblower, but a political actor - this is the point Colbert was making when he dropped kayfabe to tear into him.

    Yeah, Assange is using “whistleblower” as a shield to protect him from playing dirty with his politics, same as Cohen wanted to use his status as a “lawyer” so that attorney-client privilege would keep people from poking around too closely at all the shit he did.

  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    HamHamJ wrote: »
    The way we treat whistle blowers is deeply concerning to me and while the DNC hack has some merit I think if this really does turn into the US making an example of him instead of dealing with the more serious issue of his rape alligations I think that while be hugely unfortunate and retroactively prove all his paranoid ranting.
    Assange was not a whistle blower. People like Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden are. Assange was functionally a spy they unfortunately chose to give information to.

  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    Henroid wrote: »
    Jesus jumped up Christ Twitter is a mess over this this morning. Edward Snowden is calling this a "freedom of the press" issue, ignoring that Assange was not operating out of the interest of the press and instead at the behest of one nation to attack another. That's not being a member of the press, that's being a spy.

    Snowden is also living in Russia after handing over to Russia a shit ton of national security information and tools. Not exactly a person you should trust on any of this.

    Assange is not a whistleblower and is not covered under any of those protections either.

    Manning is a little more complicated but I do not see her as a real whistleblower but that is a personal opinion especially as someone who has worked in the foreign policy sector.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • GONG-00GONG-00 Registered User regular
    Henroid wrote: »
    Jesus jumped up Christ Twitter is a mess over this this morning. Edward Snowden is calling this a "freedom of the press" issue, ignoring that Assange was not operating out of the interest of the press and instead at the behest of one nation to attack another. That's not being a member of the press, that's being a spy.

    The irony of Snowden taking refuge in the nation responsible for that attack should not be lost on anyone.

    “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
    Law and Order ≠ Justice
    xu257gunns6e.png
  • ThawmusThawmus +Jackface Registered User regular
    Boy oh boy in that video he is not coming quickly and quietly at all. They are dragging and pushing him into that police van.

    That elicits joy for me, for some reason.

    Twitch: Thawmus83
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    GONG-00 wrote: »
    Henroid wrote: »
    Jesus jumped up Christ Twitter is a mess over this this morning. Edward Snowden is calling this a "freedom of the press" issue, ignoring that Assange was not operating out of the interest of the press and instead at the behest of one nation to attack another. That's not being a member of the press, that's being a spy.

    The irony of Snowden taking refuge in the nation responsible for that attack should not be lost on anyone.

    Snowden has always been a doofus, which is how he ended up in that situation. So this take of his is not that surprising.

  • TryCatcherTryCatcher Registered User regular
    Solvent wrote: »
    So tell me if I'm misremembering though, but weren't there a bunch of people in high places saying "Of course Assange won't be extradited to the US, this is all about Sweden and rape." I'm pretty sure my brain didn't make that up but this goes back a long time now and it's not like I've been following it all that closely.

    They were lying. Assange was always going to end in Guantanamo the second he left the embassy.

    Also, another factor is that Ecuador has another president that would rather be on the US's side than against it. (Also, it means getting stuff from the US from an easy concession that costs Ecuador nothing).

  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    Thawmus wrote: »
    Boy oh boy in that video he is not coming quickly and quietly at all. They are dragging and pushing him into that police van.

    That elicits joy for me, for some reason.

    He probably thought he would be safe indefinitely, regardless of what he did.

    Should have cleaned the kitty litter, man.

  • ThawmusThawmus +Jackface Registered User regular
    Thawmus wrote: »
    Boy oh boy in that video he is not coming quickly and quietly at all. They are dragging and pushing him into that police van.

    That elicits joy for me, for some reason.

    He probably thought he would be safe indefinitely, regardless of what he did.

    Should have cleaned the kitty litter, man.

    Yeah, I think it tells me that he doesn't have any secret trap door bullshit way of getting out of this, and he knows how fucked he is.

    I think that's what I'm picking up and getting giddy over.

    Twitch: Thawmus83
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    TryCatcher wrote: »
    Solvent wrote: »
    So tell me if I'm misremembering though, but weren't there a bunch of people in high places saying "Of course Assange won't be extradited to the US, this is all about Sweden and rape." I'm pretty sure my brain didn't make that up but this goes back a long time now and it's not like I've been following it all that closely.

    They were lying. Assange was always going to end in Guantanamo the second he left the embassy.

    Also, another factor is that Ecuador has another president that would rather be on the US's side than against it. (Also, it means getting stuff from the US from an easy concession that costs Ecuador nothing).

    I don't know why you think Assange is going to Gitmo.

Sign In or Register to comment.