The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[Zodiac Phalla] Monday the 8th: The Taste of Victory [Larg Victory!]

1235742

Posts

  • ArdorArdor Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I'm assuming, unless HB wants to clarify, that zodiac brave is a role (the holy stone group). The 4 items (2 per side) is what I thought had only a chance of being found by a vision.

    However, that means I should give the oracles more faith with my praise faith ability so their chances are higher, right?

    I could threaten people too, see more chickens running around might be a welcome change of pace.

    Ardor on
  • BalefuegoBalefuego Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    So items get transferred on death right? But we've determined that it would be pretty much impossible for us to win if stones were transferred on death... so maybe the stones aren't considered a normal item?

    This is what I was thinking.

    Balefuego on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Not sure of this is kosher but, here's the stoneholder's message board. Really, too easy to find.

    http://stoners.proboards106.com/index.cgi#strategize
    kekekekekekekeke

    Inquisitor on
  • TabascoTabasco Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Not sure of this is kosher but, here's the stoneholder's message board. Really, too easy to find.

    http://stoners.proboards106.com/index.cgi#strategize
    kekekekekekekeke

    WIN!

    Tabasco on
    Life is too important to be taken seriously.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • PlutoniumPlutonium Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I do agree with Ardor about wiping the slate clean between Phallas. It's a bit too meta-gamey to kill people based on past games, kinda like how Grimmy and I got killed off damn fast in the last game.

    That said, I'm shying away from voting for somebody claiming to represent one side or the other, because it could mean laying down my cards a bit too early, and not giving a chance for netorks to form to beat the opposite faction. Chances are anyways that the ninjas will take out the one claiming to be on the opposite team to deny networking opportunites.

    I'll save my vote for now, and see who strikes me as suspicious. The people who are voting for Infidel or TehSpectre seem to be doing it based on their "kill Larg/Goltana" instincts, because those votes are a bit too neatly divided.

    Plutonium on
  • HakkekageHakkekage Space Whore Academy summa cum laudeRegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Not sure of this is kosher but, here's the stoneholder's message board. Really, too easy to find.

    http://stoners.proboards106.com/index.cgi#strategize
    kekekekekekekeke

    Sonofabitch

    Hakkekage on
    3DS: 2165 - 6538 - 3417
    NNID: Hakkekage
  • Last SonLast Son Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    While I do think that if TS was a baddie, we would have to kill him asap... but if we're going to find all these stoners we're going to need to have people like him. I don't see what the harm is on seering him night 1... if he's being honest, then we know that we can rely on him to find the holy stoners with us. If he's a holy stoner, he dies night 2.. no harm no foul.

    And how would we know what seering result came back anyway?

    Do you want the oracle to come out and say "Hey guys, I'm the oracle and tehspectre is totally evil!". Seems like a good way to get the oracle killed.

    Last Son on
  • TabascoTabasco Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    MrBlarney wrote: »
    So TehSpectre is claiming to be part of Larg's faction and Infidel part of Goltana's. If only a few people vote for them, that puts danger on the voters, and they stand a good chance of being targeted by Ninjas and Holy Stone wielders. If a majority of players vote for the two candidates, we end up with two factions that could contain some spies, but probably will include members of the opposing faction as its majority members. I'd prefer it if the Ninjas took the time to dispatch TehSpectre and Infidel, while we look for a third character as our vote tonight. I somehow can't trust myself voting for either of the two at this point. What a bind.

    EDIT: Might as well put up the spreadsheet with the current vote tally: Current Spreadsheet (as of post 147)

    I personally voted for Infidel because I think he is a stone holder. Even though TehSpectre seems to be dying on Monday, I believe his story. But I get the feeling that Infidel is totally bluffing. To me it seems that he saw what TehSpectre was doing and was like, "Oh cool, I can pose as the side opposite of him." Now whether he is actually a G-man or an L-man is impossible to know, but I have a feeling that he has one of those stones either way.

    Tabasco on
    Life is too important to be taken seriously.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • ShintoShinto __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2007
    th_red.gif
    th_lion_rampant.jpg

    The game is afoot.

    Shinto on
  • ArdorArdor Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Welcome to the fray Shinto, it's a pleasure to see you in one of these again.

    Ardor on
  • BalefuegoBalefuego Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Tabasco wrote: »
    MrBlarney wrote: »
    So TehSpectre is claiming to be part of Larg's faction and Infidel part of Goltana's. If only a few people vote for them, that puts danger on the voters, and they stand a good chance of being targeted by Ninjas and Holy Stone wielders. If a majority of players vote for the two candidates, we end up with two factions that could contain some spies, but probably will include members of the opposing faction as its majority members. I'd prefer it if the Ninjas took the time to dispatch TehSpectre and Infidel, while we look for a third character as our vote tonight. I somehow can't trust myself voting for either of the two at this point. What a bind.

    EDIT: Might as well put up the spreadsheet with the current vote tally: Current Spreadsheet (as of post 147)

    I personally voted for Infidel because I think he is a stone holder. Even though TehSpectre seems to be dying on Monday, I believe his story. But I get the feeling that Infidel is totally bluffing. To me it seems that he saw what TehSpectre was doing and was like, "Oh cool, I can pose as the side opposite of him." Now whether he is actually a G-man or an L-man is impossible to know, but I have a feeling that he has one of those stones either way.

    You? I like the way you think.

    !retract my vote for Rygar

    !vote to kill Infidel

    Balefuego on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ShintoShinto __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2007
    Ardor wrote: »
    Welcome to the fray Shinto, it's a pleasure to see you in one of these again.

    I see TehSpectre has stolen my usual opening move.

    And Hylianbunny chose the premise of the Phalla I was going to make.

    Shinto on
  • ZerinanZerinan Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Tabasco wrote: »
    MrBlarney wrote: »
    So TehSpectre is claiming to be part of Larg's faction and Infidel part of Goltana's. If only a few people vote for them, that puts danger on the voters, and they stand a good chance of being targeted by Ninjas and Holy Stone wielders. If a majority of players vote for the two candidates, we end up with two factions that could contain some spies, but probably will include members of the opposing faction as its majority members. I'd prefer it if the Ninjas took the time to dispatch TehSpectre and Infidel, while we look for a third character as our vote tonight. I somehow can't trust myself voting for either of the two at this point. What a bind.

    EDIT: Might as well put up the spreadsheet with the current vote tally: Current Spreadsheet (as of post 147)

    I personally voted for Infidel because I think he is a stone holder. Even though TehSpectre seems to be dying on Monday, I believe his story. But I get the feeling that Infidel is totally bluffing. To me it seems that he saw what TehSpectre was doing and was like, "Oh cool, I can pose as the side opposite of him." Now whether he is actually a G-man or an L-man is impossible to know, but I have a feeling that he has one of those stones either way.

    That makes sense, but I still don't know if I'm going to vote one way or the other, I've got lots of time to decide.

    Plus I would like to say one thing. Woo! Someone else is using the G-man/L-man terms I made!

    Zerinan on
    6394_970621.png
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Last Son wrote: »
    While I do think that if TS was a baddie, we would have to kill him asap... but if we're going to find all these stoners we're going to need to have people like him. I don't see what the harm is on seering him night 1... if he's being honest, then we know that we can rely on him to find the holy stoners with us. If he's a holy stoner, he dies night 2.. no harm no foul.

    And how would we know what seering result came back anyway?

    Do you want the oracle to come out and say "Hey guys, I'm the oracle and tehspectre is totally evil!". Seems like a good way to get the oracle killed.
    So, the oracle can come out day 2 and say I'm evil. Have the knight protect the oracle after that and form a network around him.

    What is the problem there?

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    Last Son wrote: »
    While I do think that if TS was a baddie, we would have to kill him asap... but if we're going to find all these stoners we're going to need to have people like him. I don't see what the harm is on seering him night 1... if he's being honest, then we know that we can rely on him to find the holy stoners with us. If he's a holy stoner, he dies night 2.. no harm no foul.

    And how would we know what seering result came back anyway?

    Do you want the oracle to come out and say "Hey guys, I'm the oracle and tehspectre is totally evil!". Seems like a good way to get the oracle killed.
    So, the oracle can come out day 2 and say I'm evil. Have the knight protect the oracle after that and form a network around him.

    What is the problem there?

    The problem is that we don't know if the oracle is an oracle, and now we have a defensless knight.

    Small rules question about knights actually. Does the knight's ability block all attacks for the night against a person? Or just the first. IE. the knight gaurded an oracle, and a ninja attack and a holy stoner attack went off against the oracle, would the oracle live or die?

    Inquisitor on
  • ShintoShinto __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2007
    I wouldn't advise taking TehSpectre up on his plan.

    There seem to be some items out there, the powers of which are unknown. Maybe TehSpectre is a bad guy with an item that lets him seem innocent to an oracle.

    In any case, I think the oracle's are plenty able to building their own networks. The risk/reward don't add up.

    I !Vote for TehSpectre

    Shinto on
  • Last SonLast Son Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Another Knight related question. Does the night die in place of the person they are protecting? The fact that they can protect themselves says no... but the way the protect ability works in FF is that the person protecting takes the damage instead.

    Last Son on
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    For the people whining about the knight being defenseless:

    This is a common thing during most phallas, are you guys forgetting that?

    @ Shinto - Don't be jealous.

    Once again, it seems I am gonna be crucified on day one for coming out and saying I want to help. Suppose I will learn my lesson eventually, eh?

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Yes, prechance one day you shall learn how to formulate a better plan.

    O ho! I jest good sire, I jest.

    Inquisitor on
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Yes, prechance one day you shall learn how to formulate a better plan.

    O ho! I jest good sire, I jest.
    Where's that fisticuffs mechanic that I mentioned earlier? :P

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • GnastyGnasty Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I !vote for Inquisitor

    The style of his posts is annoying me.

    Gnasty on
    i just wanna 'be myself'
  • InquisitorInquisitor Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    Inquisitor wrote: »
    Yes, prechance one day you shall learn how to formulate a better plan.

    O ho! I jest good sire, I jest.
    Where's that fisticuffs mechanic that I mentioned earlier? :P

    Surely you wouldn't want to punch me good sire.

    I, I wear glasses afterall! *produces a large pair of coke-bottle glasses and places them on*

    Inquisitor on
  • BalefuegoBalefuego Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Gnasty wrote: »
    I !vote for Inquisitor

    The style of his posts is annoying me.

    If this bandwagon gets rolling, I am all aboard.

    Balefuego on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • DogDog Registered User, Administrator, Vanilla Staff admin
    edited May 2007
    Personally, i'd look into voting for someone not Infidel or Tehsceptre, and let the ninjas deal with them. Everyone's so quick to jump on the TS bandwagon but Infidel is just-as, if not more guilty revealing himself after the fact.

    Unknown User on
  • TehSpectreTehSpectre Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Guys, Inquistor is fun, no killing him yet!

    Of course, this will be taken as me having allied with Inquisitor and he -must- be a Holy Stone wielder.

    Better bandwagon away then, we don't want anyone to have fun; gosh no!

    TehSpectre on
    9u72nmv0y64e.jpg
  • OtakuD00DOtakuD00D Can I hit the exploding rocks? San DiegoRegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Oh, man. I just woke up. Time to get caught up.

    OtakuD00D on
    mw5qfhr7t7d2.jpg
  • Typhus733Typhus733 Yip! Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Robot, if we were to leave them to the ninjas who else would we go after? So far our options for suspicious persons is limited to just those two. If there were better targets I would agree but really we have no other leads.

    Typhus733 on
  • GnastyGnasty Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    In my opinion, if you vote for TS or Infidel you are making it seem like you belong to whichever faction opposes them.

    In this game the only justification you can provide for a vote against someone is that you think they're a holy stone holder. So, if I believed X was a member of my opposing faction and I wanted to get him killed, if I didn't want to expose my own faction I would have to make it seem like I'm voting for him because I think he's a holy stone guy.

    So even though all of the votes against Infidel and TS are based on the justification that the voter believes them to be holy stone holders, it doesn't mean that that is the real reason for why they're voting for that person.

    We should try to find a third candidate for death who hasn't exposed their faction yet.

    Gnasty on
    i just wanna 'be myself'
  • HakkekageHakkekage Space Whore Academy summa cum laudeRegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Gnasty wrote: »
    In my opinion, if you vote for TS or Infidel you are making it seem like you belong to whichever faction opposes them.

    In this game the only justification you can provide for a vote against someone is that you think they're a holy stone holder. So, if I believed X was a member of my opposing faction and I wanted to get him killed, if I didn't want to expose my own faction I would have to make it seem like I'm voting for him because I think he's a holy stone guy.

    So even though all of the votes against Infidel and TS are based on the justification that the voter believes them to be holy stone holders, it doesn't mean that that is the real reason for why they're voting for that person.

    We should try to find a third candidate for death who hasn't exposed their faction yet.

    Precisely

    The tough part about this game is that none of us can claim to be innocent; If I'm on your side, you hurt yourself pretty harshly with my death, but if I'm on the other side, I have to die. We can't all just be villagers. And if we give the Stoners too much of a good ratio, both sides are fucked.

    I say we build up the Infidel/TehSpectre votes so that when it comes close to night one and we need to push one of them on ahead, we can do it. Optimally, they'll be tied for second while some other unexposed bastard is in first. What remains to be seen is who that poor bastard is.

    I'm going to check the votes and see who needs a vote more, TS or Infidel. Un minuto...

    Hakkekage on
    3DS: 2165 - 6538 - 3417
    NNID: Hakkekage
  • GrimmyTOAGrimmyTOA Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Gnasty and Hakke have it right, I think. I also think that I'm going to withold further comment until we hear from Hylian as to whether Holystones count as items and roles.

    Assuming he wants to tell us, of course. Or have I missed a response from him on the subject?

    GrimmyTOA on
  • frandelgearslipfrandelgearslip 457670Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    robothero wrote: »
    Personally, i'd look into voting for someone not Infidel or Tehsceptre, and let the ninjas deal with them. Everyone's so quick to jump on the TS bandwagon but Infidel is just-as, if not more guilty revealing himself after the fact.

    I assume the fact that vigilantes can be guarded against and the execution vote can't is why people are voting for them, but I agree that the goal of the execution vote should be to try and kill stoners not factioners. Tehspectre can be either side, but I doubt that he is a stoner, because this is his standard modus operandi. The one recent game I can remember where he did not try to insert himself into the network was rygars game where he was a standard bad guy.
    Hakkekage wrote: »
    I say we build up the Infidel/TehSpectre votes so that when it comes close to night one and we need to push one of them on ahead, we can do it. Optimally, they'll be tied for second while some other unexposed bastard is in first. What remains to be seen is who that poor bastard is.

    I must be missing something, what is the point of manipulating the infidel/tehspectre votes? Are we trying to confirm lady eri? :P

    frandelgearslip on
  • Bliss 101Bliss 101 Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    TehSpectre wrote: »
    For the people whining about the knight being defenseless:

    This is a common thing during most phallas, are you guys forgetting that?

    But this isn't an ordinary Phalla. I think the guardians have more value in the endgame now, whereas in normal Phallas their primary use seems to be to serve as building blocks for an early network.

    Your plan simply requires too much trust from others to be effective, and the bottom line is, it isn't safe. What if you're a stoner or a G-man? If the seer has half a brain, he'll find a mouthpiece to announce this fact in public rather than out himself, which takes him another day to do, during which you can already proceed to start exposing or killing the specials who fell into your trap. In other words, there will be two rounds of deaths before your identity can be verified to the public, and only after that can the seer and the other specials be put in contact with each other through you. Too much can happen in that time.

    That, and there are too many unknown factors (items, holy stone kill number, the whole itemholder seering thing). The Vampire game should have taught us what happens when people become too trusting and/or overlook unknown factors.

    I admit there's a chance that I'm a bit biased here, because I truly hate insta-networks for ruining the game for most vanillagers (see my rants during the vampire game), but I'm trying hard to be objective. And objectively, you and Infidel do seem like the best candidates for staking at the moment, and the only thing that keeps me from voting yet is that the ninjas are likely to be taking you out anyway.

    Bliss 101 on
    MSL59.jpg
  • HakkekageHakkekage Space Whore Academy summa cum laudeRegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    OK, I'm counting...

    TehSpectre 6
    Infidel 4
    robothero 1
    Shamus 1
    Buzz Buzz 1
    Zerinian 1
    cj iwakura 1
    Balefuego 1
    Rygar 1

    and so I !vote Infidel to even this playing field.

    Hakkekage on
    3DS: 2165 - 6538 - 3417
    NNID: Hakkekage
  • InfidelInfidel Heretic Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    An extra day to grope blindly and hope we stumble upon a zodiac stoner

    Hey, quit groping my stones!
    :winky:

    Infidel on
    OrokosPA.png
  • LignisseLignisse Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    You don't need to post convoluted excuses for voting for the exposed people. Vote TehSpecter? You're probably Goltana. Vote Infidel? Larg. Okay? Okay.

    As someone who hates demons and their holy stones, I don't believe I'd like to reveal my faction just yet with a vote for either of those two, or a vote for anyone who voted for either of those. Sure, I have my own ideas about who would make a good successor to the throne, but I'd rather get rid of the demons first. I'm just hoping another person attracts my suspicion without giving away their faction first.

    Lignisse on
  • WearingglassesWearingglasses Of the friendly neighborhood variety Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    This looks like we're already bickering as factions, not as humans against Holy Demons.
    Just like in the game. :)

    Can anyone care to tell a summary of exactly what happened in that Vampire phalla?

    Wearingglasses on
  • HakkekageHakkekage Space Whore Academy summa cum laudeRegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Lignisse wrote: »
    You don't need to post convoluted excuses for voting for the exposed people. Vote TehSpecter? You're probably Goltana. Vote Infidel? Larg. Okay? Okay.

    Do you honestly think no one has thought of that? Some maybe, some most likely realized how mind-numbingly obvious that is and voted for their own side. And then some even realized that, and voted for the other side, and we could play this game until our dying days.

    tFrandelgearslip: The reason why I want them within voting in/out range is because people behind the scenes--in this case, I mean Stoners (maybe, Hylian hasn't responded back yet), family, anyone who is in contact with someone else--will probably be deliberating over the current situation. If we leave that in doubt; make it unclear just who is going to be killed by the vote on account of them being tied, then we confuse any little tricksies that may pop up. Remember, we aren't sure what stoners can do. if they have a killing power, they may very well kill the same person we already staked. This gives them that much less fo a chance of stabbing blindly in the dark and hitting, since most people seem concerned, a knight, or such. Plus, if we really want to kill someone, then the knight can't protect against a vote. We can't rely on ninjas to get shit done, since these people are setting themselves up for a vigilante/protection combo deluxe.

    Now I'm not a very good planner. It's tough for me to think ahead. But I figure this is a viable, mini-strategy to be employed until one of the big guns like Ardor comes up with something better.

    Also I have been watching Firefly and I feel smarter. 8-)

    Hakkekage on
    3DS: 2165 - 6538 - 3417
    NNID: Hakkekage
  • OtakuD00DOtakuD00D Can I hit the exploding rocks? San DiegoRegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Lignisse wrote: »
    You don't need to post convoluted excuses for voting for the exposed people. Vote TehSpecter? You're probably Goltana. Vote Infidel? Larg. Okay? Okay.

    As someone who hates demons and their holy stones, I don't believe I'd like to reveal my faction just yet with a vote for either of those two, or a vote for anyone who voted for either of those. Sure, I have my own ideas about who would make a good successor to the throne, but I'd rather get rid of the demons first. I'm just hoping another person attracts my suspicion without giving away their faction first.

    Hear hear. It's a bit stupid of us to wittle each other down and slowly die off while the demons sit back and have easy pickin's.

    OtakuD00D on
    mw5qfhr7t7d2.jpg
  • Anthrax! Please.Anthrax! Please. Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Frankly, I was going to suggest that we even out the votes between Spectre and Infidel, and let the fates decide. Yet, I forgot that there are meddlers in the midst, who might mistally our votes in the wrong way.

    If we could arrange for them not to fudge the votes, or fudge votes against the person claiming to not be their faction, we would be able to have a tie, and in that case, only one of the two would be selected at random.

    That is of course if the will of the community dictates death to those who would announce their potentially false alleigences this early in the game.

    Anthrax! Please. on
  • MrBlarneyMrBlarney Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    So I suppose we're at a bit of an impasse. How does one make a vote without revealing so much about ones own allegiance? It's certainly an issue that players have to consider in their actions in any other game, but it's perhaps even more important in this case. Do we have any good targets yet whom haven't claimed a faction yet? I have the feeling things will start to run quicker once we pass the first night, but for now, things are moving slow as people are cautious to make any moves.

    MrBlarney on
    4463rwiq7r47.png
Sign In or Register to comment.