As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
We're funding a new Acquisitions Incorporated series on Kickstarter right now! Check it out at https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pennyarcade/acquisitions-incorporated-the-series-2

DVI -> HDMI = Bleh

KrunkMcGrunkKrunkMcGrunk Registered User regular
edited May 2007 in Games and Technology
I'm hoping this thread is in the right place. If not, feel free to do whatever you see fit, mods.

I recently picked up a 26" Samsung LCD to use as a computer monitor. My intention was to use a DVI to HDMI cable for a big, high-res picture. However, when I use HDMI, the picture looks like crap. It's really hard to read things, as everything is extremely pixilated. It looks almost as if the sharpness on the TV is turned up way too high.

I know that the TV supports 1366 x 768 res through the VGA port on the back. However, I was under the impression that I could get something much nicer by using DVI to HDMI. In fact, I can get the resolution to go much higher than 1366 x 768, but it makes everything look absolutely terrible. Is there something else that I need to adjust? Or am I just stuck with a shitty picture?


Video Card, BTW:

GeForce 7600 GTS

mrsatansig.png
KrunkMcGrunk on

Posts

  • TxdoHawkTxdoHawk Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    This seems rather odd, I have pondered going this route in the past and could have sworn I was told this would work nicely. What I would look into, assuming what I was told was right and this should work fine:

    - Have you used the DVI port on your video card before with other displays? If you've only started using it now for this, perhaps it's a faulty port/connection and you simply never knew.

    - Googling your TV's model number to see if there are specific problems with displaying certain resolutions over HDMI.

    - Trying a different cable, if you can get your hands on one.

    TxdoHawk on
    TuxedoHawk.png
  • Shazkar ShadowstormShazkar Shadowstorm Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Not to hijack, but related question... where's a cheap place to get DVI-HDMI cables? Also, better pictures from that or component on a Samsung DLP using a Comcast cable box?

    Um, question for OP... did you try setting your computer at the same resolution as the TV?

    Shazkar Shadowstorm on
    poo
  • LachLach Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Probably looks blurry and hard to read because you're above the monitor's ideal res.

    Lach on
  • KrunkMcGrunkKrunkMcGrunk Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Not to hijack, but related question... where's a cheap place to get DVI-HDMI cables? Also, better pictures from that or component on a Samsung DLP using a Comcast cable box?

    Um, question for OP... did you try setting your computer at the same resolution as the TV?

    I picked up my cable for $12 total at newegg.com. It's a pretty nice site for cheap tech stuff.

    Yeah, I've tried multiple resolutions. The only one that even looked decent was 1280 x 700 (I think?). But that's lower res than I get with the VGA connection, so it seems a bit backwards. I was led to believe that I could get much higher resolutions from DVI -> HDMI.

    I haven't used my DVI port before now, so it's possible that it could just be bad. However, my video card is relatively new (about 6 months) and I've never botched an installation before. It's a strong possibility though. I'd just like to make sure that I'm not missing anything before I go do something drastic, like buying a new vid card.
    Probably looks blurry and hard to read because you're above the monitor's ideal res.

    Yeah, I'm leaning towards that explanation. But it seems a bit odd that I'd get a better resolution out of VGA than HDMI. I thought HDMI was able to do something around 1080 or so, at max.

    KrunkMcGrunk on
    mrsatansig.png
  • WillethWilleth Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Not to hijack, but related question... where's a cheap place to get DVI-HDMI cables?

    http://www.monoprice.com for all your cabling needs.

    Willeth on
    @vgreminders - Don't miss out on timed events in gaming!
    @gamefacts - Totally and utterly true gaming facts on the regular!
  • Shooter McgavinShooter Mcgavin Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I got a DVI-HDMI cable for 6 bucks from newegg. It's only about 2ft long though, so it may not suit your needs

    Shooter Mcgavin on
    banner.gif
  • LachLach Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    DVI or HDMI doesn't really allow higher resolutions, it's just supposed to look better because it's digital. Usually looks about the same for most people.

    Lach on
  • TxdoHawkTxdoHawk Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Lach wrote: »
    Probably looks blurry and hard to read because you're above the monitor's ideal res.

    Oh, I didn't even think about that. Yeah, I would look up what the native resolution of your LCD is and try that. If the difference is extremely noticeable, it could very well be an issue of your monitor having a low-quality scaler.

    TxdoHawk on
    TuxedoHawk.png
  • SudsSuds Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    1366x768 isn't a resolution supported by video cards. (1366 isn't divisible by 8 evenly).

    You might want to try a program called PowerStrip to add custom resolutions to your registry. The one I used was 1366x768 (PDP), which adds the resolution 1368x768 to my registry.

    Now my desktop runs at 1368x768 and a pixel doesn't get displayed on either side.

    As for gaming, the nearest supported resolution for video cards would be 1280x768. You might want to see if you're TV has that as a selectable display mode.

    Mine has:
    1366x768 at Pixel for Pixel
    1280x768 at Pixel for Pixel, and Stretch
    1024x768 at Pixel for Pixel, Stretch and Zoom.

    However, it can also display 800x600 and 640x480.

    Any resolution with a 768 as the second number, displaying pixel for pixel (meaning you'll have black bars on either side) will give you the clearest picture.

    Edit: You're TV's native resolution is 1366x768.

    Suds on
    camo_sig2.png
  • SiliconStewSiliconStew Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    LCD's only look good and sharp at their native resolution. Your TV has a resolution of 1366x768. Set your computer settings to the same resolution. For example, my video card shows 1360x768 as an option which is probably as close as you're going to get.

    The type of cable you use (VGA, DVI, HDMI) does not effect the resolution of the screen.


    Technically, any computer resolution settings that are even multiples of the TV's resolution (horz. or vert.) will prevent blurring: 680x384, 2720x1536, 680x768, 1360x384, 2720x768, 1360x1536, etc. But the smaller res will make it look blocky and your video card probably can't support the higher ones.

    SiliconStew on
    Just remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence.
  • FreddyDFreddyD Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I've noticed that the colors are oversaturated and bleed when I use DVI-> HDMI to connect my computer to my television. VGA on the other hand looks vibrant and sharp at 1360x768 (after changing the cleartype settings and doing some tweaking in the Nvidia control panel).

    I think that the television does some image processing with HDMI input that it does not do with VGA input.

    FreddyD on
  • DonaldRumsfeldDonaldRumsfeld Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I'm hoping this thread is in the right place. If not, feel free to do whatever you see fit, mods.

    I recently picked up a 26" Samsung LCD to use as a computer monitor. My intention was to use a DVI to HDMI cable for a big, high-res picture. However, when I use HDMI, the picture looks like crap. It's really hard to read things, as everything is extremely pixilated. It looks almost as if the sharpness on the TV is turned up way too high.

    I know that the TV supports 1366 x 768 res through the VGA port on the back. However, I was under the impression that I could get something much nicer by using DVI to HDMI. In fact, I can get the resolution to go much higher than 1366 x 768, but it makes everything look absolutely terrible. Is there something else that I need to adjust? Or am I just stuck with a shitty picture?


    Video Card, BTW:

    GeForce 7600 GTS
    my friend has an older model samsung and I'm pretty sure the manual said the HDMI port was not meant to support computer displays and that you have to use the VGA port

    again this was an older model but it had the exact same problem with HDMI that you are having

    DonaldRumsfeld on
    111111A.png
  • KrunkMcGrunkKrunkMcGrunk Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Yeah, the 2006 Samsungs don't support DVI to HDMI hookups. The 2007's (the kind that I have) does. Anyhow, it is probably that my TV's native resolution is a too low for anything higher. Thanks for the help, everyone.

    KrunkMcGrunk on
    mrsatansig.png
  • Bouncing_SoulBouncing_Soul Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Well shit I don't like where this thread is going since I just bought the same cable for my Sharp Aquos.

    Anyone have any experience with this, or am I just going to find out when I get the cable?

    Bouncing_Soul on
    Umlauf.gif
    Buy some useless stuff at my Cafepress site!
  • SudsSuds Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    My Aquos has a DVI port so I just use that.

    Suds on
    camo_sig2.png
  • harvestharvest By birthright, a stupendous badass.Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    The interface you use to connect to a fixed-pixel display will never change the fact that it's a fixed-pixel display. Almost any LCD can accept a video signal of any resolution, but it will only ever look correct at the display's native resolution.

    If you try to run a 1366x768 display at anything other than that resolution it will always look like ass. The method you use to get the signal into the display makes no difference.

    harvest on
    B6yM5w2.gif
  • OptimusWangOptimusWang Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Quick thread hijack: I picked up an older 53" rear projection HDTV on the cheap from a coworker who was moving and didn't want to haul the thing with him, and want to hook my iMac up to it. It only has component and an s-video inputs though, and I keep hearing that s-video will look like ass.

    My question is this: Is there a way to convert either VGA or DVI to component and have it look nice, or am I stuck with s-video cables (and if so, is s-video really that bad?)

    OptimusWang on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Quick thread hijack: I picked up an older 53" rear projection HDTV on the cheap from a coworker who was moving and didn't want to haul the thing with him, and want to hook my iMac up to it. It only has component and an s-video inputs though, and I keep hearing that s-video will look like ass.

    My question is this: Is there a way to convert either VGA or DVI to component and have it look nice, or am I stuck with s-video cables (and if so, is s-video really that bad?)

    The thing about S-Video is that it only supports 480i (and, I suppose, even lower resolutions like 240p).

    Daedalus on
  • OptimusWangOptimusWang Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Fuuuuuuck, I was wanting to use it to play games on :?

    Any idea about converting vga or dvi to component? bueler? buuuueler?

    OptimusWang on
  • bigtimeslackerbigtimeslacker Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    FreddyD wrote: »
    (after changing the cleartype settings and doing some tweaking in the Nvidia control panel).

    i'm curious what kind of setting you tweaked with the cleartype. i run my desktop at 1360x768 over dvi-hdmi and i notice this weird effect were black text on a white background looks bold in spots and not in others. its actually in this vertical pattern that seems to get bold in 4 waves across the screen.

    bigtimeslacker on
    pa_sig.jpg
  • KrunkMcGrunkKrunkMcGrunk Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Fuuuuuuck, I was wanting to use it to play games on :?

    Any idea about converting vga or dvi to component? bueler? buuuueler?

    Well, considering the problem isn't really with what hook-up you use, but rather the resolution of the TV itself, you probably won't see an improvement.

    I'm a bit disappointed with how games look on it. I mean, there's no blur or anything silly like that. It's just that I am close enough (about 2-3' away) that I can see every pixel. It's a bit annoying. On the bright side, I still have a nice TV.

    KrunkMcGrunk on
    mrsatansig.png
  • Scarlet WingsScarlet Wings Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I don't understand why people insist on using televisions as monitors. They realize that televisions have inherently poor performance with PCs, right?

    Scarlet Wings on
    \m/ (>_<) \m/
  • OptimusWangOptimusWang Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Fuuuuuuck, I was wanting to use it to play games on :?

    Any idea about converting vga or dvi to component? bueler? buuuueler?

    Well, considering the problem isn't really with what hook-up you use, but rather the resolution of the TV itself, you probably won't see an improvement.

    I'm a bit disappointed with how games look on it. I mean, there's no blur or anything silly like that. It's just that I am close enough (about 2-3' away) that I can see every pixel. It's a bit annoying. On the bright side, I still have a nice TV.

    It's a 1080i, so if 480 is the best I can get it is the hook-up that's the problem :(

    Also, the idea was to play Eve (older game anyway) and possibly LOTRO, as well as run Front Row through it. Front Row will be fine at that res (I hope), but not being able to play games at a decent res is a bummer.

    OptimusWang on
  • bigtimeslackerbigtimeslacker Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I don't understand why people insist on using televisions as monitors. They realize that televisions have inherently poor performance with PCs, right?

    the line between televisions and monitors seems to be blurring. and lcd display is still an lcd display if its called a television or monitor. that being said, you need to look at what inputs you have on a device, dot pitch, resolution, and response time. in general a lcd display that is more often used as a computer monitor will have will have a higher resolution, finer dot pitch, and faster response time, but there are alot of television/monitor devices out there now that are big enough to use as a television but also just fine when used as monitor. i have a 32" sharp aquos that i use as both and i am quite happy with it (the problem i mentioned early being only a minor one and hopefully fixable)

    bigtimeslacker on
    pa_sig.jpg
  • OptimusWangOptimusWang Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Anyone have any experience with one of these?
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814999205

    I have an ATI card, but the reviews aren't very promising :?

    OptimusWang on
  • KrunkMcGrunkKrunkMcGrunk Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Fuuuuuuck, I was wanting to use it to play games on :?

    Any idea about converting vga or dvi to component? bueler? buuuueler?

    Well, considering the problem isn't really with what hook-up you use, but rather the resolution of the TV itself, you probably won't see an improvement.

    I'm a bit disappointed with how games look on it. I mean, there's no blur or anything silly like that. It's just that I am close enough (about 2-3' away) that I can see every pixel. It's a bit annoying. On the bright side, I still have a nice TV.

    It's a 1080i, so if 480 is the best I can get it is the hook-up that's the problem :(

    Also, the idea was to play Eve (older game anyway) and possibly LOTRO, as well as run Front Row through it. Front Row will be fine at that res (I hope), but not being able to play games at a decent res is a bummer.

    Well, what kind of hook-up are you using? And has your video card correctly identified the monitor? When I had first hooked my Samsung up, it took a couple of tries before my vid card actually recognized that I had disconnected my old monitor and hooked up a new one. But yeah, if you are getting resolution that low, you may want to try a different hookup.

    I could be completely off base, but I thought I had read that 1080i = 720p. That is a result of the TV mashing up lines near the sides of the screen. Thus, you don't truly have 1080 lines in an "i" configuration. But, in a "p" you actually do have the amount of lines that are advertised (electronic geeks will have fun with my horrid analogy).

    KrunkMcGrunk on
    mrsatansig.png
  • Bouncing_SoulBouncing_Soul Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I don't understand why people insist on using televisions as monitors. They realize that televisions have inherently poor performance with PCs, right?

    Bigger is better.

    Bouncing_Soul on
    Umlauf.gif
    Buy some useless stuff at my Cafepress site!
  • SudsSuds Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    "i" means interlaced. Which means that for every frame, only half of the lines are showing or 540. In the next frame the other half will show.

    That said, 540p will not look the same as 1080i to your eyes. Although 1080p would be sharper than 1080i. Personally I can't really tell the difference.

    Since only 540 vertical pixels are being used, a TV that has a vertical picture range higher than 540 can do 1080i.

    Suds on
    camo_sig2.png
  • harvestharvest By birthright, a stupendous badass.Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    I don't understand why people insist on using televisions as monitors. They realize that televisions have inherently poor performance with PCs, right?

    This is why. The pic is bad, but you get the idea.

    woahbig.jpg

    1920x1080 is barely bigger than 1600x1200, but at 37" 4 feet from your face it's totally awesome.

    harvest on
    B6yM5w2.gif
  • Dangerou-DaveDangerou-Dave __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2007
    I don't know, I might be shooting myself in the foot down the road by saying this, but I do not want a 37" monitor.

    Dangerou-Dave on
  • SploozooSploozoo Grillaface Richmond VARegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    It may have already been said but dvi => hdmi is not the culprit. its the fact that a tv that can only display 720p.

    if your tv does 1080p, then you can use 1920*1080 and get really good resolution.

    i use a sceptre naga x37 (1080p) for my computer monitor (dvi to hdmi) and the picture is amazing.

    Sploozoo on
    Mnemonic anamnesis.

    aka Grillaface
  • Bouncing_SoulBouncing_Soul Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Ok so I've got the 37" Aquos, the max it does is 1080i.

    Regarding the post above, is this going to look like ass even with the native resolution (if I'm able to set it to that)?

    Bouncing_Soul on
    Umlauf.gif
    Buy some useless stuff at my Cafepress site!
  • SploozooSploozoo Grillaface Richmond VARegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Ok so I've got the 37" Aquos, the max it does is 1080i.

    Regarding the post above, is this going to look like ass even with the native resolution (if I'm able to set it to that)?

    well for "normal" computing use, yeah, its going to look like ass.

    for video, gaming, tv, etc, it'll look great.

    but your fonts and icons will look weird. it's probably not set in stone, i'm no expert, but i don't think you can set a 1080i display above 1,280x720, just like 720p

    1080p sets usually have a native res of 1920*1080, which makes them desirable for cpu purposes

    as a general rule of thumb then i'd say if your tv doesn't support 1080p then don't plan on using as your primary computer monitor

    Sploozoo on
    Mnemonic anamnesis.

    aka Grillaface
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Guys.

    If your TV is not a CRT, then it does not do 1080i. It takes your 1080i signal and downscales it to whatever its actual resolution is (or, in the case of 1080p sets, deinterlaces it to 1080p).

    The ONLY kind of display that actually displays an interlaced image, without deinterlacing or scaling, is a CRT.

    Daedalus on
  • Bouncing_SoulBouncing_Soul Registered User regular
    edited May 2007
    Ok I need to revive this thread cause I'm having some issues.

    I just got my DVI->HDMI cable today and hooked it up from my PC to the TV (Sharp 37" Aquos). The TV doesn't even try to display an image, at all.

    I have an nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, it's got 1 DVI port and 1 VGA port, and I've been running dual monitors on it with no problem. I also have UltraMon. Both it and the Windows display properties seem to sort of know a second monitor is hooked up (the TV in place of my LCD monitor), but the monitor is grayed out in the properties.

    I googled a bit and couldn't find anything about drivers, or any help really. Any Ideas?

    Bouncing_Soul on
    Umlauf.gif
    Buy some useless stuff at my Cafepress site!
  • DaemonionDaemonion Mountain Man USARegistered User regular
    edited May 2007
    My understanding is that it is less about DVI or HDMI and more about resolution.

    You can easily get 24'' computer monitors that output at least 1920x1200.

    Daemonion on
Sign In or Register to comment.