The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Continuing to Discuss the [2020 Primary] and Not Other Stuff

14951535455

Posts

  • IlpalaIlpala Just this guy, y'know TexasRegistered User regular
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    Hell, Sanders himself was beaten by a woman in 2016 primary, so I have no idea why he would say a woman can’t win 2020.

    Me neither.

    That's why I don't believe it.

    Plus, didn't Bernie say he tried to get Warren to run in 2016?

    Both those things happened, but they also both happened before the 2016 general, which you could understand possibly changing how people feel about that particular question.

    FF XIV - Qih'to Furishu (on Siren), Battle.Net - Ilpala#1975
    Switch - SW-7373-3669-3011
    Fuck Joe Manchin
  • SyphonBlueSyphonBlue The studying beaver That beaver sure loves studying!Registered User regular
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    I did not see this, so this is good to see now, thank you.

    LxX6eco.jpg
    PSN/Steam/NNID: SyphonBlue | BNet: SyphonBlue#1126
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited January 2020
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.

    Edit 2: Or massively shifting goalposts when results weren't what they wanted.

    Quid on
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    This whole damn thing annoys me because both of them need to focus on Biden.

    Yes, Trump is the long term target, but Biden is the immediate opponent that needs to be taken down. Biden is weak in Iowa and if he underperforms in the first primary state, then he’s weakened in the rest.

    Warren or her team should have sat on this until Biden is at least neutralized or campaigning from a weaker position and Sanders needs to not make things worse by lying about it.

    All this shit does is help Biden become the candidate.

    The second they saw CNN and the rest of these fuckers in the media egging then on, they both should have backed off. Now it’s all everyone is talking about and you got Warren supporters saying Sanders is sexist and Sanders supporters are feeling victimized because of how the debate moderators leaned hard into this.

    The media is playing this hard now and Biden is gonna laugh his ass off to Iowa.

    This was a strategic blunder.

    The story was already blowing up. All Warren's campaign did was confirm that it happened, like many people (again, including people in this thread now complaining about her confirming it) were demanding she do.

    Warren and her team couldn't sit on the story, they could only not comment on it. While getting blamed for not commenting on it.

    I don’t mean sitting on Warren’s reaction. By that point it was too late. I don’t fault Warren or her campaign for that.

    I’m talking about the initial report that got this started, the “two staffers close to Warren and two other people” part. Whoever those staffers are should have waited until Biden was out of the way.

    Actually that makes me curious: The script thing was released first, then Sanders denied it, then the leak about Sanders and Warren’s conversation came out, then shit started getting worse.

    Please tell me this isn’t a thing and Biden isn’t going to win because some staffer on Warren’s campaign leaked this too early after Sander’s campaign lied about the script that’s a complete nothingburger?

    It was not two staffers close to Warren.

    Again, CNN sources:
    two people Warren spoke with directly soon after the encounter, and two people familiar with the meeting
    CNN does not say anyone in the campaign was involved with this.

  • SurfpossumSurfpossum A nonentity trying to preserve the anonymity he so richly deserves.Registered User regular
    I already accidentally broke well past my "two posts on a subject" rule and I'm disappointed in myself that it was for something this dumb so let me just say that I will be extremely happy if either Bernie or Warren ends up getting nominated.

    Literally anyone removing Trump would feel like a massive weight off my soul but I would be genuinely enthusiastic for those two.

  • ElendilElendil Registered User regular
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

  • Bloods EndBloods End Blade of Tyshalle Punch dimensionRegistered User regular
    Warren supporters talk about US sexism and what that does for female politicians all the time. Its one of the primary reasons given for the 2016 loss. To then act like someone saying that women under that environment couldnt win the presidency is being sexist just feels like a serious stretch unless you believe Sanders was actually saying women as a class arent good enough to win due to their own failures as a class, which is beyond parody.

    Hillary still won the popular vote by the largest margin in US history. She had 2.8 million more votes than Trump. Second place is Bush v Gore at just over 500 thousand.

    I’m not saying sexism wasn’t a factor in 2016, but I think it should be obvious that a woman can win the even in this toxic environment.

    Hell, Sanders himself was beaten by a woman in 2016 primary, so I have no idea why he would say a woman can’t win 2020.

    He's an old white guy they say stupid shit all the time.

  • MonwynMonwyn Apathy's a tragedy, and boredom is a crime. A little bit of everything, all of the time.Registered User regular
    Elendil wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

    After all it's Warren's duty to be subservient to the best interests of the Sanders campaign. She should have said women can't win when asked!

    uH3IcEi.png
  • Hexmage-PAHexmage-PA Registered User regular
    Bloods End wrote: »
    Warren supporters talk about US sexism and what that does for female politicians all the time. Its one of the primary reasons given for the 2016 loss. To then act like someone saying that women under that environment couldnt win the presidency is being sexist just feels like a serious stretch unless you believe Sanders was actually saying women as a class arent good enough to win due to their own failures as a class, which is beyond parody.

    Hillary still won the popular vote by the largest margin in US history. She had 2.8 million more votes than Trump. Second place is Bush v Gore at just over 500 thousand.

    I’m not saying sexism wasn’t a factor in 2016, but I think it should be obvious that a woman can win the even in this toxic environment.

    Hell, Sanders himself was beaten by a woman in 2016 primary, so I have no idea why he would say a woman can’t win 2020.

    He's an old white guy they say stupid shit all the time.

    He's Jewish, actually.

  • jammujammu 2020 is now. Registered User regular
    Elizabeth Warren was the original source. It doesn't really matter, who finally told the reporter about what she said.
    It could be her campaign intentionally (either with or without her consent). it could be a loose lips incident by her staffers. In any case it is her responsibility.

    Ww8FAMg.jpg
  • AbsalonAbsalon Lands of Always WinterRegistered User regular
    You can believe Warren and still believe it was handled poorly given the importance of beating Biden, capped off with the unneeded skipping of the handshake.

  • Mild ConfusionMild Confusion Smash All Things Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    This whole damn thing annoys me because both of them need to focus on Biden.

    Yes, Trump is the long term target, but Biden is the immediate opponent that needs to be taken down. Biden is weak in Iowa and if he underperforms in the first primary state, then he’s weakened in the rest.

    Warren or her team should have sat on this until Biden is at least neutralized or campaigning from a weaker position and Sanders needs to not make things worse by lying about it.

    All this shit does is help Biden become the candidate.

    The second they saw CNN and the rest of these fuckers in the media egging then on, they both should have backed off. Now it’s all everyone is talking about and you got Warren supporters saying Sanders is sexist and Sanders supporters are feeling victimized because of how the debate moderators leaned hard into this.

    The media is playing this hard now and Biden is gonna laugh his ass off to Iowa.

    This was a strategic blunder.

    The story was already blowing up. All Warren's campaign did was confirm that it happened, like many people (again, including people in this thread now complaining about her confirming it) were demanding she do.

    Warren and her team couldn't sit on the story, they could only not comment on it. While getting blamed for not commenting on it.

    I don’t mean sitting on Warren’s reaction. By that point it was too late. I don’t fault Warren or her campaign for that.

    I’m talking about the initial report that got this started, the “two staffers close to Warren and two other people” part. Whoever those staffers are should have waited until Biden was out of the way.

    Actually that makes me curious: The script thing was released first, then Sanders denied it, then the leak about Sanders and Warren’s conversation came out, then shit started getting worse.

    Please tell me this isn’t a thing and Biden isn’t going to win because some staffer on Warren’s campaign leaked this too early after Sander’s campaign lied about the script that’s a complete nothingburger?

    It was not two staffers close to Warren.

    Again, CNN sources:
    two people Warren spoke with directly soon after the encounter, and two people familiar with the meeting
    CNN does not say anyone in the campaign was involved with this.

    Fair enough. Not campaign staffers.

    So she told two friends? Colleagues? The first two random people she met?

    Whomever leaked this may have been trying to help her campaign, wether they are staffers or not, but I don’t think it’s going the way they wanted.

    It was still a mistake to release the conversation before Biden is out of the way.

    steam_sig.png

    Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Elendil wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

    I quoted her literal response to the issue last page. Wherein she says it doesn't matter and we should talk about other shit.

    In the debate she took it as an opportunity to say "Yes women can win" and toot her own horn. Bernie took it as an opportunity to say "Yes, women can win" and emphasizing his own history in supporting women.

    As far as I can tell neither of them tried to make this an attack on the other or do anything but de-escalate the situation.

  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    jammu wrote: »
    Elizabeth Warren was the original source. It doesn't really matter, who finally told the reporter about what she said.
    It could be her campaign intentionally (either with or without her consent). it could be a loose lips incident by her staffers. In any case it is her responsibility.

    How dare she tell her side of events to the people around her.

  • Hexmage-PAHexmage-PA Registered User regular
    edited January 2020
    Monwyn wrote: »
    Elendil wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

    After all it's Warren's duty to be subservient to the best interests of the Sanders campaign. She should have said women can't win when asked!

    CNN: "Senator Sanders, did you say a woman can't win?"
    Sanders: "No."
    CNN: "Senator Warren, what did you think when Senator Sanders said a woman can't win?"

    Hexmage-PA on
  • MonwynMonwyn Apathy's a tragedy, and boredom is a crime. A little bit of everything, all of the time.Registered User regular
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    Monwyn wrote: »
    Elendil wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

    After all it's Warren's duty to be subservient to the best interests of the Sanders campaign. She should have said women can't win when asked!

    CNN: "Senator Sanders, did you say a woman can't win?"
    Sanders: "No."
    CNN: "Senator Warren, what did you think when Senator Sanders said a woman can't win?"

    In what respect is Warren responsible for shitty journalists being shitty?

    uH3IcEi.png
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited January 2020
    jammu wrote: »
    Elizabeth Warren was the original source. It doesn't really matter, who finally told the reporter about what she said.
    It could be her campaign intentionally (either with or without her consent). it could be a loose lips incident by her staffers. In any case it is her responsibility.

    Nice dude. You found a way to blame a woman for this the most out of anyone. It's impressive.

    Even though we've got like tons of post sources just in the past 2 pages alone going over the various statements and sources for those statements on the issue.

    shryke on
  • SyphonBlueSyphonBlue The studying beaver That beaver sure loves studying!Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    This whole damn thing annoys me because both of them need to focus on Biden.

    Yes, Trump is the long term target, but Biden is the immediate opponent that needs to be taken down. Biden is weak in Iowa and if he underperforms in the first primary state, then he’s weakened in the rest.

    Warren or her team should have sat on this until Biden is at least neutralized or campaigning from a weaker position and Sanders needs to not make things worse by lying about it.

    All this shit does is help Biden become the candidate.

    The second they saw CNN and the rest of these fuckers in the media egging then on, they both should have backed off. Now it’s all everyone is talking about and you got Warren supporters saying Sanders is sexist and Sanders supporters are feeling victimized because of how the debate moderators leaned hard into this.

    The media is playing this hard now and Biden is gonna laugh his ass off to Iowa.

    This was a strategic blunder.

    The story was already blowing up. All Warren's campaign did was confirm that it happened, like many people (again, including people in this thread now complaining about her confirming it) were demanding she do.

    Warren and her team couldn't sit on the story, they could only not comment on it. While getting blamed for not commenting on it.

    I don’t mean sitting on Warren’s reaction. By that point it was too late. I don’t fault Warren or her campaign for that.

    I’m talking about the initial report that got this started, the “two staffers close to Warren and two other people” part. Whoever those staffers are should have waited until Biden was out of the way.

    Actually that makes me curious: The script thing was released first, then Sanders denied it, then the leak about Sanders and Warren’s conversation came out, then shit started getting worse.

    Please tell me this isn’t a thing and Biden isn’t going to win because some staffer on Warren’s campaign leaked this too early after Sander’s campaign lied about the script that’s a complete nothingburger?

    It was not two staffers close to Warren.

    Again, CNN sources:
    two people Warren spoke with directly soon after the encounter, and two people familiar with the meeting
    CNN does not say anyone in the campaign was involved with this.

    Fair enough. Not campaign staffers.

    So she told two friends? Colleagues? The first two random people she met?

    Whomever leaked this may have been trying to help her campaign, wether they are staffers or not, but I don’t think it’s going the way they wanted.

    It was still a mistake to release the conversation before Biden is out of the way.

    Again, we have no idea WHO released the conversation. It only states Warren talked with two people, it does not state they were Warren campaign people. They could have been two Sanders campaign people. We don't know.

    LxX6eco.jpg
    PSN/Steam/NNID: SyphonBlue | BNet: SyphonBlue#1126
  • Styrofoam SammichStyrofoam Sammich WANT. normal (not weird)Registered User regular
    Monwyn wrote: »
    Elendil wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

    After all it's Warren's duty to be subservient to the best interests of the Sanders campaign. She should have said women can't win when asked!

    Thisbis trying to have it both ways.

    wq09t4opzrlc.jpg
  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    Monwyn wrote: »
    Elendil wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

    After all it's Warren's duty to be subservient to the best interests of the Sanders campaign. She should have said women can't win when asked!

    CNN: "Senator Sanders, did you say a woman can't win?"
    Sanders: "No."
    CNN: "Senator Warren, what did you think when Senator Sanders said a woman can't win?"

    I don’t see how this bad question is in any way Warren’s fault or responsibility. Be mad at CNN for asking such a bad question.

  • BizazedoBizazedo Registered User regular
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    CNN: "Senator Sanders, did you say a woman can't win?"
    Sanders: "No."
    CNN: "Senator Warren, what did you think when Senator Sanders said a woman can't win?"
    That sequence annoyed the hell out of me so much. At least have the presence of mind to adjust the following question based on the prior answer.

    XBL: Bizazedo
    PSN: Bizazedo
    CFN: Bizazedo (I don't think I suck, add me).
  • MonwynMonwyn Apathy's a tragedy, and boredom is a crime. A little bit of everything, all of the time.Registered User regular
    Monwyn wrote: »
    Elendil wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

    After all it's Warren's duty to be subservient to the best interests of the Sanders campaign. She should have said women can't win when asked!

    Thisbis trying to have it both ways.

    What precisely would you have had her say?

    I don't think she wanted this out here, because it's stupid, and absent the heritage thing she hasn't done anything stupid. But once it's out you can either use it or drop and endorse Sanders. There are no other options.

    uH3IcEi.png
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited January 2020
    Marathon wrote: »
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    Monwyn wrote: »
    Elendil wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    milski wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    No-Quarter wrote: »
    Also, SURPRISE! Turns out that Slack script document was legit and deployed to a few states.

    So much for rogue staffers!
    DES MOINES, Iowa — The controversial talking points attacking Elizabeth Warren that Bernie Sanders' campaign deployed were given to teams in at least two early voting states on Friday, three Sanders campaign officials confirmed.

    Volunteers and staffers used the script on Saturday while canvassing for votes, meaning the talking points were more official than what Sanders previously suggested after POLITICO reported on the language.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/sanders-admits-anti-warren-script-early-states-098786

    Did Sanders specifically deny this or was it a staffer or was The Campaign or was there even a reported denial?

    Sanders himself specifically addressed it with a non-denial that implied it was just staffers saying things they shouldn't, rather than an actual campaign position.

    Sooo, kind of like how he addressed the "women can't win" comment?

    Specifically, I haven't seen him explicitly denying saying the thing Warren attributed to him

    He did address it directly.
    Earlier in the day, Sanders said in a statement that “staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened.”

    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win,” Sanders said. He acknowledged that gender came up during their conversation. “What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could," Sanders said.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/13/warren-sanders-feud-098494

    Some of y'all are straight up refusing to acknowledge reality and it's more than a little unsettling.

    Ahh this is the quote I wanted to see.

    So, they're both right, no one lied, it's a miscommunication being propped up as a big news event when in reality it is anything but.

    I would like both Warren and Sanders to release a commercial clearing it up and then ending it with "Now let's all go back to making fun of Biden and Buttigieg"

    They've both said it's not a big deal.

    Unfortunately that's not enough for some people to move on and they feel a need to objectively prove everything terrible is one specific person's fault.

    Which wouldn't be such a big deal if wild claims weren't being made in order to do so.
    warren de-escalated by turning it into a debate own

    After all it's Warren's duty to be subservient to the best interests of the Sanders campaign. She should have said women can't win when asked!

    CNN: "Senator Sanders, did you say a woman can't win?"
    Sanders: "No."
    CNN: "Senator Warren, what did you think when Senator Sanders said a woman can't win?"

    I don’t see how this bad question is in any way Warren’s fault or responsibility. Be mad at CNN for asking such a bad question.

    I don't see how either candidate handled it badly either. Both basically just went and talked about how woman can totally win elections and also vote for me.

    Acknowledge topic, say the right thing, pivot to self-promotion, don't try and start a fight.

    shryke on
  • Hexmage-PAHexmage-PA Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    As far as I can tell neither of them tried to make this an attack on the other or do anything but de-escalate the situation.

    Senator Warren refused to shake Senator Sander's hand after the debate.

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    As far as I can tell neither of them tried to make this an attack on the other or do anything but de-escalate the situation.

    Senator Warren refused to shake Senator Sander's hand after the debate.

    This perfidious attack! The massive escalation!

    This is joke dude. What are you even doing?

  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    Hexmage-PA wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    As far as I can tell neither of them tried to make this an attack on the other or do anything but de-escalate the situation.

    Senator Warren refused to shake Senator Sander's hand after the debate.

    Might be related to him essentially calling her a liar during the debate.

  • ElendilElendil Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    I don't see how either candidate handled it badly either. Both basically just went and talked about how woman can totally win elections and also vote for me.

    Acknowledge topic, say the right thing, pivot to self-promotion, don't try and start a fight.
    does this look it worked to you

  • -Tal-Tal Registered User regular
    I can hardly blame warren for taking advantage of crappy CNN questions to make herself look as good as possible, instead of... making excuses for her competitor?

    PNk1Ml4.png
  • BogartBogart Streetwise Hercules Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    Guys, we’ve had half a dozen reports of various flavours of dumb from this thread in about half an hour.

    If you like this thread you should be nicer in it, because I would really like to close it right now.

  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    edited January 2020
    Based on what everyone has said, I feel this is the most likely reality:

    1) During their conversation, Bernie says something about how if the Democratic nominee is a woman then Trump will attack her in sexist ways and that those attacks would be effective. Probably a true statement, but "effective" can be interpreted in a variety of ways. Perhaps he meant there's a subset of voters who will respond to those attacks, so it would make the margin smaller than if a man with identical positions were the nominee. If that's what he meant, it's a reasonable and fair point. But he tends to talk in an aggressive, blunt manner so I find it entirely plausible that...
    2) Warren, informed by her history of being told women cannot do things (including winning elections), interprets "effective" as meaning that it would lead to a Trump victory. She is frustrated by this and shares it with several confidants. The story of this meeting becomes a semi-open secret inside the Democratic Party.
    3) The story leaks. I suspect the initial source is the campaign who had the most to gain here (BIDEN) but we don't have any real details.
    4) Bernie gives the following statement to CNN:
    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win," Sanders said. "It's sad that, three weeks before the Iowa caucus and a year after that private conversation, staff who weren't in the room are lying about what happened. What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could. Do I believe a woman can win in 2020? Of course! After all, Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump by 3 million votes in 2016."

    The bolded is an important escalation. And shows no self-reflection.

    5) A couple hours later, Warren releases her statement. She says Bernie said a female candidate couldn't win and that she disagreed. But it's mostly conciliatory with how they agree on most issues, etc. etc. etc.
    6) When asked at the debate Bernie repeats that it never happened.
    7) Given the history of how sexist shit works, Warren's displeased with him in the moment, thus the post-debate interaction.

    You know how this could have been fixed really easily? If Sanders opts to say something like:
    "It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldn't win," Sanders said. What I did say that night was that Donald Trump is a sexist, a racist and a liar who would weaponize whatever he could. Upon reflection and speaking to my wife and women on my staff, I realize how Elizabeth could have interpreted that to mean that I think a woman could not win. Do I believe a woman can win in 2020? Of course! After all, Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump by 3 million votes in 2016."

    enlightenedbum on
    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    Elendil wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    I don't see how either candidate handled it badly either. Both basically just went and talked about how woman can totally win elections and also vote for me.

    Acknowledge topic, say the right thing, pivot to self-promotion, don't try and start a fight.
    does this look it worked to you

    I don't think either candidate can completely control the fact that people really enjoy fighting about useless bullshit.

    We're all in this together
  • SyphonBlueSyphonBlue The studying beaver That beaver sure loves studying!Registered User regular
    Elendil wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    I don't see how either candidate handled it badly either. Both basically just went and talked about how woman can totally win elections and also vote for me.

    Acknowledge topic, say the right thing, pivot to self-promotion, don't try and start a fight.
    does this look it worked to you

    Well it did help to point out how some people will always attack the woman over any slight no matter how small or whether she even did the thing or not

    LxX6eco.jpg
    PSN/Steam/NNID: SyphonBlue | BNet: SyphonBlue#1126
  • AthenorAthenor Battle Hardened Optimist The Skies of HiigaraRegistered User regular
    Can we focus on what's really important: That Biden's response to this controversy was to say he helped get 27 women elected in 2018, as if they wouldn't have gotten elected without him?

    He/Him | "We who believe in freedom cannot rest." - Dr. Johnetta Cole, 7/22/2024
  • MonwynMonwyn Apathy's a tragedy, and boredom is a crime. A little bit of everything, all of the time.Registered User regular
    Elendil wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    I don't see how either candidate handled it badly either. Both basically just went and talked about how woman can totally win elections and also vote for me.

    Acknowledge topic, say the right thing, pivot to self-promotion, don't try and start a fight.
    does this look it worked to you

    An unreasonable number of Sanders supporters will take any excuse to portray someone as an enemy of the revolution. Outside of meekly cringing before him there was no way to stop this from happening once the story broke.

    uH3IcEi.png
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Elendil wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    I don't see how either candidate handled it badly either. Both basically just went and talked about how woman can totally win elections and also vote for me.

    Acknowledge topic, say the right thing, pivot to self-promotion, don't try and start a fight.
    does this look it worked to you

    Given the immediate reaction to her confirming the story was to call her a liar, I don't see how anything could have worked. Both campaigns have tried to de-escalate but even in this thread we've still got "it's all Warrens fault" and "she's a liar" floating around.

  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    This idea that Warren committed some egregious breach of etiquette by not shaking hands with Bernie is beyond silly.

    At no point in this story has Bernie said anything close to an apology for what he said, I even if he didn’t mean it the way Warren took it. Unless you are claiming that Warren is 100% lying about the entire story and she made the whole thing up. Bernie seemingly said something and Warren took it in a way it wasn’t intended.

    Instead of apologizing or offering any indication that he understands her feelings, Bernie doubles down and says that it’s not true.

    And people wonder why Warren might be, in the moment, pissed at her friend and not exactly in the mood to shake his hand?

  • Mild ConfusionMild Confusion Smash All Things Registered User regular
    SyphonBlue wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    This whole damn thing annoys me because both of them need to focus on Biden.

    Yes, Trump is the long term target, but Biden is the immediate opponent that needs to be taken down. Biden is weak in Iowa and if he underperforms in the first primary state, then he’s weakened in the rest.

    Warren or her team should have sat on this until Biden is at least neutralized or campaigning from a weaker position and Sanders needs to not make things worse by lying about it.

    All this shit does is help Biden become the candidate.

    The second they saw CNN and the rest of these fuckers in the media egging then on, they both should have backed off. Now it’s all everyone is talking about and you got Warren supporters saying Sanders is sexist and Sanders supporters are feeling victimized because of how the debate moderators leaned hard into this.

    The media is playing this hard now and Biden is gonna laugh his ass off to Iowa.

    This was a strategic blunder.

    The story was already blowing up. All Warren's campaign did was confirm that it happened, like many people (again, including people in this thread now complaining about her confirming it) were demanding she do.

    Warren and her team couldn't sit on the story, they could only not comment on it. While getting blamed for not commenting on it.

    I don’t mean sitting on Warren’s reaction. By that point it was too late. I don’t fault Warren or her campaign for that.

    I’m talking about the initial report that got this started, the “two staffers close to Warren and two other people” part. Whoever those staffers are should have waited until Biden was out of the way.

    Actually that makes me curious: The script thing was released first, then Sanders denied it, then the leak about Sanders and Warren’s conversation came out, then shit started getting worse.

    Please tell me this isn’t a thing and Biden isn’t going to win because some staffer on Warren’s campaign leaked this too early after Sander’s campaign lied about the script that’s a complete nothingburger?

    It was not two staffers close to Warren.

    Again, CNN sources:
    two people Warren spoke with directly soon after the encounter, and two people familiar with the meeting
    CNN does not say anyone in the campaign was involved with this.

    Fair enough. Not campaign staffers.

    So she told two friends? Colleagues? The first two random people she met?

    Whomever leaked this may have been trying to help her campaign, wether they are staffers or not, but I don’t think it’s going the way they wanted.

    It was still a mistake to release the conversation before Biden is out of the way.

    Again, we have no idea WHO released the conversation. It only states Warren talked with two people, it does not state they were Warren campaign people. They could have been two Sanders campaign people. We don't know.

    My original assertion is that this was a blunder and the only person it helps is Biden.

    If Warren’s team or friend or whoever did it, it’s a mistake because they should have waited until Biden was gone.

    If Sanders team or friend or whatever did it, then for fucks sake that’s stupid (and pretty unlikely unless they were purposely trying to sabotage him).

    This helps Biden only. And I suppose CNN.

    It was stupid for Sanders and Warren to go after each other. Wait till Biden is gone, then they can go at it.

    That is what is so upsetting about all this to me: All the effort in this entire conversation is pointless if Biden doesn’t lose. Warren is my first choice, but I’d be happy with Sanders too. All the other candidates I’d vote for in the general, but they don’t excite me. Having these two go at each other, wether it’s just in the media or this forum or for realsies, while Biden is still winning is a fucking waste.

    steam_sig.png

    Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    SyphonBlue wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    shryke wrote: »
    This whole damn thing annoys me because both of them need to focus on Biden.

    Yes, Trump is the long term target, but Biden is the immediate opponent that needs to be taken down. Biden is weak in Iowa and if he underperforms in the first primary state, then he’s weakened in the rest.

    Warren or her team should have sat on this until Biden is at least neutralized or campaigning from a weaker position and Sanders needs to not make things worse by lying about it.

    All this shit does is help Biden become the candidate.

    The second they saw CNN and the rest of these fuckers in the media egging then on, they both should have backed off. Now it’s all everyone is talking about and you got Warren supporters saying Sanders is sexist and Sanders supporters are feeling victimized because of how the debate moderators leaned hard into this.

    The media is playing this hard now and Biden is gonna laugh his ass off to Iowa.

    This was a strategic blunder.

    The story was already blowing up. All Warren's campaign did was confirm that it happened, like many people (again, including people in this thread now complaining about her confirming it) were demanding she do.

    Warren and her team couldn't sit on the story, they could only not comment on it. While getting blamed for not commenting on it.

    I don’t mean sitting on Warren’s reaction. By that point it was too late. I don’t fault Warren or her campaign for that.

    I’m talking about the initial report that got this started, the “two staffers close to Warren and two other people” part. Whoever those staffers are should have waited until Biden was out of the way.

    Actually that makes me curious: The script thing was released first, then Sanders denied it, then the leak about Sanders and Warren’s conversation came out, then shit started getting worse.

    Please tell me this isn’t a thing and Biden isn’t going to win because some staffer on Warren’s campaign leaked this too early after Sander’s campaign lied about the script that’s a complete nothingburger?

    It was not two staffers close to Warren.

    Again, CNN sources:
    two people Warren spoke with directly soon after the encounter, and two people familiar with the meeting
    CNN does not say anyone in the campaign was involved with this.

    Fair enough. Not campaign staffers.

    So she told two friends? Colleagues? The first two random people she met?

    Whomever leaked this may have been trying to help her campaign, wether they are staffers or not, but I don’t think it’s going the way they wanted.

    It was still a mistake to release the conversation before Biden is out of the way.

    Again, we have no idea WHO released the conversation. It only states Warren talked with two people, it does not state they were Warren campaign people. They could have been two Sanders campaign people. We don't know.

    My original assertion is that this was a blunder and the only person it helps is Biden.

    If Warren’s team or friend or whoever did it, it’s a mistake because they should have waited until Biden was gone.

    If Sanders team or friend or whatever did it, then for fucks sake that’s stupid (and pretty unlikely unless they were purposely trying to sabotage him).

    This helps Biden only. And I suppose CNN.

    It was stupid for Sanders and Warren to go after each other. Wait till Biden is gone, then they can go at it.

    That is what is so upsetting about all this to me: All the effort in this entire conversation is pointless if Biden doesn’t lose. Warren is my first choice, but I’d be happy with Sanders too. All the other candidates I’d vote for in the general, but they don’t excite me. Having these two go at each other, wether it’s just in the media or this forum or for realsies, while Biden is still winning is a fucking waste.

    It wasn't a blunder if Biden leaked it.

    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    Look all I know is that I like it when my preferred candidate does a mild attack on their primary opponent and when they are mildly attacked by the same opponent it is the greatest injustice in the world.

    Honestly my eye has been literally involuntarily twitching reading the last couple of pages, but clearly CNN won last night’s debate because now we are fighting over the dumbest bullshit ever.

  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    Speaking of, I'm going to do a weird thing and praise David Sirota:



    He's Bernie's speechwriter and is trying to wrestle his fans back towards being mad at Biden, who is going to walk away with this nomination if nobody does anything to stop it.

    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
This discussion has been closed.