The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

National Protests are Still a Thing Because of [Police Brutality]

12467102

Posts

  • HevachHevach Registered User regular
    edited June 2020
    He taught his black people to read, though, didn't you see that part? To read!

    I honestly don't know why Confederate apologists keep bringing that up, but at least it's been since the 90's since I've heard that he got them baptized, too, and that's also supposed to count for something.

    Hevach on
  • Captain InertiaCaptain Inertia Central OhioRegistered User regular
    Hevach wrote: »
    He taught his black people to read, though, didn't you see that part? To read!

    I honestly don't know why Confederate apologists keep bringing that up, but at least it's been since the 90's since I've heard that he got them baptized, too, and that's supposed to count for something.

    Because they think it’s a goddamn miracle because they’re scum

    l7ygmd1dd4p1.jpeg
    3b2y43dozpk3.jpeg
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    Hevach wrote: »
    He taught his black people to read, though, didn't you see that part? To read!

    I honestly don't know why Confederate apologists keep bringing that up, but at least it's been since the 90's since I've heard that he got them baptized, too, and that's also supposed to count for something.

    Because they’re Confederate apologists, Avy

    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    It was illegal to teach slaves to read and write back then. I think.

  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    The thing which always gets me is that they didn't even put up the statues to these people at the bloody time. Now, that Lee one went up in 1890 and so you can MAYBE say that it actually represents historical views and perspectives of the man and his actions. Maybe there are a few like that which would be better served by being removed from their public positions and placed in a museum, or allowed to remain but as an explicit memorial to the victims of the confederacy.

    But almost all of them barring a very select few went up in the 40s and 50s. They are explicitly monuments which say nothing other than, "We want you to remember that people who aren't white are second class citizens". There's no reason for them to 'be'. If it didn't go up within 25 years of the end of the civil war. Pull it down.

    The reason I feel this is a problem is because a lot of people don't KNOW this about all the confederate monuments. And there is a real argument to be had about the merits of removing real historical artifacts etc. If you tear down the past without thinking, then should we pull down the pyramids? Or bulldoze versailles? It gets you into a position where the racists can claim that oh, they are protecting statues of Napoleon, or Winston Churchill or Lord Nelson and that those historical artifacts are the same as these tinpot monuments to hate. Maybe they are. But thats a VERY hard argument to have. And you don't need to have it.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • GyralGyral Registered User regular
    edited June 2020
    Ladies and gentlemen, your average NC conservative. That I don't go on a chainsaw killing spree every day in this fuckhole state is a blessing from their stupid God.

    Gyral on
    25t9pjnmqicf.jpg
  • Dark_SideDark_Side Registered User regular
    edited June 2020
    Ah, so the lady is dressed up in remembrance of "the good old days".

    I doubt any real thought went into this other than "I want to go to that statue and cause a dramatic scene with my 36 year old white knight in tow." It's pretty funny though that he was too lazy to scrounge up his own civil war reenactment gear.

    Dark_Side on
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    Hevach wrote: »
    He taught his black people to read, though, didn't you see that part? To read!

    I honestly don't know why Confederate apologists keep bringing that up, but at least it's been since the 90's since I've heard that he got them baptized, too, and that's also supposed to count for something.

    Lee was a particular focus of the Lost Cause, to the point that "Leeaboo" is A Thing.

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • XantomasXantomas Registered User regular
    Another white man should have gone up to them and thrown his glove at her and told the man to silence his woman, she's clearly hysterical and then challenge him to a duel when he doth protest. What, you want to cherry pick the parts of your historical romance now?

  • Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    edited June 2020
    "Sure, everyone else was shit, but we can point to and beatify at least one halfway-decent person on our side!"

    Commander Zoom on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Alazull wrote: »
    zepherin wrote: »
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Apparently, it's not a once-in-a-lifetime way to...ahem...commit suicide.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Chavis_Carter

    Looks like it was a thing that (reportedly) happened once a year between 2012 and 2014.

    That dude was definitely murdered, but the bit about being left-handed is actually completely irrelevant.

    video snip

    34:00 in.

    Sherlock Holmes was written by someone who had an education from the late 1800s. Granted he was a doctor, but saying that, literally 100 years later that some of the plot elements don't hold up is kind of bullshit. It's the equivalent of calling The Adventures of Tom Sawyer garbage because there issues we can see with 100 years of knowledge that Mark Twain didn't necessarily have.

    This is more than a little off-topic, but since you've decided to critique a critique...

    The show being called out was written in the last ten years be someone who received an education in the late 1900s. So while the plot points of the original Sherlock Holmes as written by Arthur Conan Doyle can be excused for their time, it is incredibly okay to point out that Steven Moffat is a bit of a hack.

    And the point still stands that pointing out handedness is an at best outdated piece of sleuthing.

    Two off-topics don't make an on-topic.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • NobeardNobeard North Carolina: Failed StateRegistered User regular
    Gyral wrote: »
    Ladies and gentlemen, your average NC conservative. That I don't go on a chainsaw killing spree every day in this fuckhole state is a blessing from their stupid God.

    I'm sure she felt quite smug about getting to appear calm when confronted with anger. I would not condone her being punched in the mouth, but I would understand the impulse.

  • KruiteKruite Registered User regular
    Would it be too off topic to post a video deconstructing the "Lost Cause" myth? I came across it that other day and the historian does a pretty good job ripping it to pieces; one particularly good note is that Robert E Lee was not a kind gentleman. He was president of Washington College, now named Washington and Lee. An early chapter of the KKK formed under his tenure and they developed a reputation of kidnapping and raping young black girls from local black schools. I've been trying to find whether he took strict action or said anything, so far I have no found anything. He did condemn a group of students wishing to take an unofficial chirstmas day break, which I find revealing.

    Taking a christmas vacation, public condemnation. A bunch of good ol boys raping girls? Silence.

  • Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    edited June 2020
    Nobeard wrote: »
    Gyral wrote: »
    Ladies and gentlemen, your average NC conservative. That I don't go on a chainsaw killing spree every day in this fuckhole state is a blessing from their stupid God.

    I'm sure she felt quite smug about getting to appear calm when confronted with anger. I would not condone her being punched in the mouth, but I would understand the impulse.

    No, you're supposed to slap her. Especially if you're an older, land-owning male.

    Commander Zoom on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Ehhhhhhh, let's keep this thread slightly more focused than just Racism: The Thread.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • VoodooVVoodooV Registered User regular
    That's exactly where this sort of thing is heading towards though. There is no peaceful endgame if/when a racist gets their world views codified into law. In no way ever do minorities just peacefully accept a society where they are 2nd class citizens or worse. Racist speech really needs to be legally classified as "fighting words" and not protected under the 1st amendment. Being told you're not deserving of equal protection under the law is not anything anyone should accept, peaceably or otherwise.

  • AlazullAlazull Your body is not a temple, it's an amusement park. Enjoy the ride.Registered User regular
    edited June 2020
    Ah, so the lady is dressed up in remembrance of "the good old days". Y'know, the days when women couldn't vote, could be regularly beaten by their husband with zero consequences, were held in value only moderately above slaves, were wholly discounted as being independently intelligent individuals, and were respected mostly for their ability to bear as many male children as possible.

    The fact that she completely misses the point that Jackson had slaves and was fighting to keep people as slaves as being the problems does not surprise me, considering the romanticized, utterly false slice of "better times" she decided to personify.

    Oh dude there are huge swathes of the South where the dog whistle of "Make America Great Again" is absolutely returning to the Antebellum South. And when you try to discuss with these folks that that means re-instituting slavery you'll quickly find that the disinformation of Confederate apologists has done it's job. No, the South rebelled for their freedoms, and the tyrants of the North would do well to remember that they will rise again.

    I mean real talk when we moved back while I was in high school my mom was like, "Hey, don't tell people you're related to General Sherman on your dad's side." And sure as hell I didn't think anything of it and mentioned it in a history class and totally got my ass kicked in the locker room by a bunch of boys wearing Confederate flag belt buckles.

    Basically the huge issue that this is illuminating is that the whites in the South who aren't racist as fuck are delusional as fuck. Although after the last few weeks, I'm starting to wonder if that problem is exclusively beyond the Mason-Dixon line.

    Alazull on
    User name Alazull on Steam, PSN, Nintenders, Epic, etc.
  • AlazullAlazull Your body is not a temple, it's an amusement park. Enjoy the ride.Registered User regular
    Dark_Side wrote: »
    Ah, so the lady is dressed up in remembrance of "the good old days".

    I doubt any real thought went into this other than "I want to go to that statue and cause a dramatic scene with my 36 year old white knight in tow." It's pretty funny though that he was too lazy to scrounge up his own civil war reenactment gear.

    Alternatively just smart enough to realize that dressing as Johnny Rebel might lead to him getting the tar beat out of him.

    User name Alazull on Steam, PSN, Nintenders, Epic, etc.
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    VoodooV wrote: »
    That's exactly where this sort of thing is heading towards though. There is no peaceful endgame if/when a racist gets their world views codified into law. In no way ever do minorities just peacefully accept a society where they are 2nd class citizens or worse. Racist speech really needs to be legally classified as "fighting words" and not protected under the 1st amendment. Being told you're not deserving of equal protection under the law is not anything anyone should accept, peaceably or otherwise.

    If you wish to discuss things that are not covered in this particular thread, you are welcome to create another thread.

    You are allowed to have multiple threads discussing different related aspects of a larger issue. We're cool that way.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • PhillisherePhillishere Registered User regular
    "Sure, everyone else was shit, but we can point to and beatify at least one halfway-decent person on our side!"

    Robert E. Lee was scum. His family have hidden his papers for decades, and the glimpses historians have seen are of a harsh and brutal slave master. The kindly general is just another lie:

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/529038/

  • NobeardNobeard North Carolina: Failed StateRegistered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Ehhhhhhh, let's keep this thread slightly more focused than just Racism: The Thread.

    I'm afraid the racist are gonna keep escalating until general racism is the topic. Not that we aren't going to follow mod guidelines or seek to accelerate the change, I just think it's bound to happen.

  • MayabirdMayabird Pecking at the keyboardRegistered User regular


    NK Jemisin is a many-times award winning SF author living in NYC.

    Just an anecdote, but from pictures and other anecdotes all over it seems protesters are being pretty good about masking up and being as sanitary as possible while in mass protests during the goddamn global pandemic.

  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Mayabird wrote: »


    NK Jemisin is a many-times award winning SF author living in NYC.

    Just an anecdote, but from pictures and other anecdotes all over it seems protesters are being pretty good about masking up and being as sanitary as possible while in mass protests during the goddamn global pandemic.

    I think the people who are interested in protesting for a progressive issue and people who take a public health issue seriously are very overlappy.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • TetraNitroCubaneTetraNitroCubane Not Angry... Just VERY Disappointed...Registered User regular
    edited June 2020

    BETHEL, KY* - while getting yelled at by an angry mob of Trump supporters, protestor gets PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD right in front of multiple police officers... who do nothing.

    MORE

    *Actual location was updated to be Bethel, Ohio

    The cops really are just showing their true colors more and more these days. They are plenty happy to defend angry mobs with guns, so long as those angry mobs are pointing their aggression toward peaceful protesters trying to stop discrimination.

    TetraNitroCubane on
  • TynnanTynnan seldom correct, never unsure Registered User regular
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

  • Captain InertiaCaptain Inertia Central OhioRegistered User regular
    edited June 2020

    BETHEL, KY* - while getting yelled at by an angry mob of Trump supporters, protestor gets PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD right in front of multiple police officers... who do nothing.

    MORE

    *Actual location was updated to be Bethel, Ohio

    The cops really are just showing their true colors more and more these days. They are plenty happy to defend angry mobs with guns, so long as those angry mobs are pointing their aggression toward peaceful protesters trying to stop discrimination.

    Numerous protestors were assaulted, not just the person in the embedded video. Cops did nothing in all cases.

    Edit: oh, the MAGA chuds were there because of a chain email Facebook rumor that the demonstration was organized by antifa...it was organized by a substitute teacher who’s apparent sweetness may only be matched by her naivety /shrug

    Captain Inertia on
    l7ygmd1dd4p1.jpeg
    3b2y43dozpk3.jpeg
  • Just_Bri_ThanksJust_Bri_Thanks Seething with rage from a handbasket.Registered User, ClubPA regular

    BETHEL, KY* - while getting yelled at by an angry mob of Trump supporters, protestor gets PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD right in front of multiple police officers... who do nothing.

    MORE

    *Actual location was updated to be Bethel, Ohio

    The cops really are just showing their true colors more and more these days. They are plenty happy to defend angry mobs with guns, so long as those angry mobs are pointing their aggression toward peaceful protesters trying to stop discrimination.

    Just a friendly reminder that there is supreme court precedent that cops are not required to pursue violations of the law any more than DAs are.

    ...and when you are done with that; take a folding
    chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
  • TaranisTaranis Registered User regular
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    If only we could rely on the police to follow the law.

    It’s nice to see an ordinance that makes police brutality illegal though.

    EH28YFo.jpg
  • ErlkönigErlkönig Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    Taranis wrote: »
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    If only we could rely on the police to follow the law.

    It’s nice to see an ordinance that makes police brutality illegal though.

    They can still beat people with their clubs/nightsticks.

    Also, reading the wording real close... How are kinetic impact projectiles restrained by the ordinance? The definition they use for what constitutes a "crowd-control weapon" is something that is designed to affect multiple individuals. A "kinetic impact projectile" is only going to affect a single person per trigger-pull. It seems that rubber bullets may still be on the table regardless of the ordinance.

    | Origin/R*SC: Ein7919 | Battle.net: Erlkonig#1448 | XBL: Lexicanum | Steam: Der Erlkönig (the umlaut is important) |
  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular

    BETHEL, KY* - while getting yelled at by an angry mob of Trump supporters, protestor gets PUNCHED IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD right in front of multiple police officers... who do nothing.

    MORE

    *Actual location was updated to be Bethel, Ohio

    The cops really are just showing their true colors more and more these days. They are plenty happy to defend angry mobs with guns, so long as those angry mobs are pointing their aggression toward peaceful protesters trying to stop discrimination.

    All I see are Klan members but wearing MAGA shit instead of hoods. Feeling so comfortable they don't have to hide their face anymore.

    That is horrifying.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • mittensmittens he/himRegistered User regular
    According to the local Cincinnati subreddit, about 10 or so people were injured. No arrests made, police are only "looking into matters" (not even an official investigation).

  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    Mace is almost always a safer option than a club.

    Learning to deescalate even more so but hey it’s a start.

  • TaranisTaranis Registered User regular
    edited June 2020
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    If only we could rely on the police to follow the law.

    It’s nice to see an ordinance that makes police brutality illegal though.

    They can still beat people with their clubs/nightsticks.

    Also, reading the wording real close... How are kinetic impact projectiles restrained by the ordinance? The definition they use for what constitutes a "crowd-control weapon" is something that is designed to affect multiple individuals. A "kinetic impact projectile" is only going to affect a single person per trigger-pull. It seems that rubber bullets may still be on the table regardless of the ordinance.
    None of that really matters so much. It’s the city council saying that the status quo for police brutality is illegal, and probably immoral. No matter how ineffectual the actual ordinance, it’s the city council flipping the ‘law and order’ narrative that cops hide behind. Cops are cracking down on lawful protests with means that are now illegal, which now explicitly justifies the protests. It's a victory. It doesn't matter so much that the ordinance was probably written by bureaucrats and not tacticians.

    Has the Seattle City Council said anything on the CHAZ/CHOP?

    Taranis on
    EH28YFo.jpg
  • ErlkönigErlkönig Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited June 2020
    Taranis wrote: »
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    If only we could rely on the police to follow the law.

    It’s nice to see an ordinance that makes police brutality illegal though.

    They can still beat people with their clubs/nightsticks.

    Also, reading the wording real close... How are kinetic impact projectiles restrained by the ordinance? The definition they use for what constitutes a "crowd-control weapon" is something that is designed to affect multiple individuals. A "kinetic impact projectile" is only going to affect a single person per trigger-pull. It seems that rubber bullets may still be on the table regardless of the ordinance.
    None of that really matters so much. It’s the city council saying that the status quo for police brutality is illegal, and probably immoral. No matter how ineffectual the actual ordinance, it’s the city council flipping the ‘law and order’ narrative that cops hide behind. Cops are cracking down on lawful protests with means that are now illegal, which now explicitly justifies the protests. It's a victory. It doesn't matter so much that the ordinance was probably written by bureaucrats and not tacticians.

    Has the Seattle City Council said anything on the CHAZ/CHOP?

    The problem is that if the ordinance is written in such a way, rubber bullets wouldn't fall under the category of "crowd control weapons." Yes, teargas (except the OC pepper cannisters) will be made illegal. Chokeholds are also illegal, yet people are still being choked out by police.

    Erlkönig on
    | Origin/R*SC: Ein7919 | Battle.net: Erlkonig#1448 | XBL: Lexicanum | Steam: Der Erlkönig (the umlaut is important) |
  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    If only we could rely on the police to follow the law.

    It’s nice to see an ordinance that makes police brutality illegal though.

    They can still beat people with their clubs/nightsticks.

    Also, reading the wording real close... How are kinetic impact projectiles restrained by the ordinance? The definition they use for what constitutes a "crowd-control weapon" is something that is designed to affect multiple individuals. A "kinetic impact projectile" is only going to affect a single person per trigger-pull. It seems that rubber bullets may still be on the table regardless of the ordinance.
    None of that really matters so much. It’s the city council saying that the status quo for police brutality is illegal, and probably immoral. No matter how ineffectual the actual ordinance, it’s the city council flipping the ‘law and order’ narrative that cops hide behind. Cops are cracking down on lawful protests with means that are now illegal, which now explicitly justifies the protests. It's a victory. It doesn't matter so much that the ordinance was probably written by bureaucrats and not tacticians.

    Has the Seattle City Council said anything on the CHAZ/CHOP?

    The problem is that if the ordinance is written in such a way, rubber bullets wouldn't fall under the category of "crowd control weapons." Yes, teargas (except the OC pepper cannisters) will be made illegal. Chokeholds are also illegal, yet people are still being choked out by police.

    Teargas is an object, not a move all humans are capable of. Bit harder for SPD to cover up.

  • HakkekageHakkekage Space Whore Academy summa cum laudeRegistered User regular
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    If only we could rely on the police to follow the law.

    It’s nice to see an ordinance that makes police brutality illegal though.

    They can still beat people with their clubs/nightsticks.

    Also, reading the wording real close... How are kinetic impact projectiles restrained by the ordinance? The definition they use for what constitutes a "crowd-control weapon" is something that is designed to affect multiple individuals. A "kinetic impact projectile" is only going to affect a single person per trigger-pull. It seems that rubber bullets may still be on the table regardless of the ordinance.
    None of that really matters so much. It’s the city council saying that the status quo for police brutality is illegal, and probably immoral. No matter how ineffectual the actual ordinance, it’s the city council flipping the ‘law and order’ narrative that cops hide behind. Cops are cracking down on lawful protests with means that are now illegal, which now explicitly justifies the protests. It's a victory. It doesn't matter so much that the ordinance was probably written by bureaucrats and not tacticians.

    Has the Seattle City Council said anything on the CHAZ/CHOP?

    The problem is that if the ordinance is written in such a way, rubber bullets wouldn't fall under the category of "crowd control weapons." Yes, teargas (except the OC pepper cannisters) will be made illegal. Chokeholds are also illegal, yet people are still being choked out by police.

    No. Rule of the last antecedent -- grammar construction. "or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort" modifies only the last element in the series, not every element in the list. Kinetic Impact Projectile is the jargony industry term for rubber bullet. It is not restricted by terms modifying the general term at the end of a series of specific elements.

    3DS: 2165 - 6538 - 3417
    NNID: Hakkekage
  • TaranisTaranis Registered User regular
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    If only we could rely on the police to follow the law.

    It’s nice to see an ordinance that makes police brutality illegal though.

    They can still beat people with their clubs/nightsticks.

    Also, reading the wording real close... How are kinetic impact projectiles restrained by the ordinance? The definition they use for what constitutes a "crowd-control weapon" is something that is designed to affect multiple individuals. A "kinetic impact projectile" is only going to affect a single person per trigger-pull. It seems that rubber bullets may still be on the table regardless of the ordinance.
    None of that really matters so much. It’s the city council saying that the status quo for police brutality is illegal, and probably immoral. No matter how ineffectual the actual ordinance, it’s the city council flipping the ‘law and order’ narrative that cops hide behind. Cops are cracking down on lawful protests with means that are now illegal, which now explicitly justifies the protests. It's a victory. It doesn't matter so much that the ordinance was probably written by bureaucrats and not tacticians.

    Has the Seattle City Council said anything on the CHAZ/CHOP?

    The problem is that if the ordinance is written in such a way, rubber bullets wouldn't fall under the category of "crowd control weapons." Yes, teargas (except the OC pepper cannisters) will be made illegal. Chokeholds are also illegal, yet people are still being choked out by police.

    Does that read as intentional on the city council's part? To me this reads like the city council trying trying to legislatively side with the protestors, but failing to pass something comprehensive.

    EH28YFo.jpg
  • HakkekageHakkekage Space Whore Academy summa cum laudeRegistered User regular
    Taranis wrote: »
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Erlkönig wrote: »
    Taranis wrote: »
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    If only we could rely on the police to follow the law.

    It’s nice to see an ordinance that makes police brutality illegal though.

    They can still beat people with their clubs/nightsticks.

    Also, reading the wording real close... How are kinetic impact projectiles restrained by the ordinance? The definition they use for what constitutes a "crowd-control weapon" is something that is designed to affect multiple individuals. A "kinetic impact projectile" is only going to affect a single person per trigger-pull. It seems that rubber bullets may still be on the table regardless of the ordinance.
    None of that really matters so much. It’s the city council saying that the status quo for police brutality is illegal, and probably immoral. No matter how ineffectual the actual ordinance, it’s the city council flipping the ‘law and order’ narrative that cops hide behind. Cops are cracking down on lawful protests with means that are now illegal, which now explicitly justifies the protests. It's a victory. It doesn't matter so much that the ordinance was probably written by bureaucrats and not tacticians.

    Has the Seattle City Council said anything on the CHAZ/CHOP?

    The problem is that if the ordinance is written in such a way, rubber bullets wouldn't fall under the category of "crowd control weapons." Yes, teargas (except the OC pepper cannisters) will be made illegal. Chokeholds are also illegal, yet people are still being choked out by police.

    Does that read as intentional on the city council's part? To me this reads like the city council trying trying to legislatively side with the protestors, but failing to pass something comprehensive.

    IT IS COMPREHENSIVE

    On this the day of Gorsuch textually interpreting Title VII to encompass sexual orientation, you come to me with amateur statutory construction

    3DS: 2165 - 6538 - 3417
    NNID: Hakkekage
  • KanaKana Registered User regular
    Tynnan wrote: »
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Seattle Step 1:

    (reporter)
    Breaking: The Seattle City Council has unanimously voted to ban SPD from owning, purchasing, renting, or using crowd control weapons, such as tear gas, after the deployment of such devices several times in the past couple weeks of #seattleprotest.

    Here's the text of the ordinance. Looks like it broadly covers sprays, tear gas, sonic weapons, less-lethal projectiles, focused energy emitters, water cannons, and a few others. There appears to be a carve-out for OC (pepper) spray as long as it is not deployed at demonstrations, rallies, or first amendment-protected protests - if a cop uses it against someone committing a criminal act or posing an imminent danger to others, OC can be used as long as it does not get on anyone other than that person.
    AN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.



    body

    WHEREAS, The City of Seattle supports the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly as essential democratic rights; and

    WHEREAS, on May 25, 2020 officers of the Minneapolis Police Department brutally killed George Floyd, while he was handcuffed and in their custody; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle and in cities across the country, people joined a protest movement against this and other police violence, particularly protesting the police violence disproportionately targeting African American people; and

    WHEREAS, in Seattle, tens of thousands of community members have joined mass demonstrations for black lives and against police violence on May 30, 2020 and on subsequent days; and

    WHEREAS, the SPD has responded to these protests against police violence with crowd control weaponry including lachrymator agents commonly known as tear gas and pepper spray and explosive devices such as blast balls and stun grenades; and

    WHEREAS, Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability reported on June 3, 2020 that they had received 15,000 complaints of police misconduct related to the SPD’s response to these protests; and

    WHEREAS, testimony from protestors and other protest witnesses, along with video evidence has shown the SPD instigating and escalating violent confrontations with these protests; and

    WHEREAS, the use of tear gas in war is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, which set forth agreements signed by nearly every nation in the world, including the United States; and

    WHEREAS, infectious disease experts warn that the use of tear gas and other lachrymator agents will increase the spread of COVID-19; and

    WHEREAS, research shows that tear gas increases the risk of respiratory infection; and

    WHEREAS, an open letter signed by over 1,000 healthcare professionals opposes, “any use of tear gas, smoke, or other respiratory irritants, which could increase risk for COVID-19 by making the respiratory tract more susceptible to infection, exacerbating existing inflammation and inducing coughing”; and

    WHEREAS, studies into the impacts of policing at protests have determined that escalating force by police at protests leads to increasing violence; and

    WHEREAS, during public comment at the Seattle City Council meeting on June 1, 2020, and the meeting of the Council’s Public Safety and Human Services Committee on June 3, 2020, members of the public attested to being prevented from joining George Floyd protests out of fear of violence at the hands of the Seattle Police Department; and

    WHEREAS, a June 1, 2020 release from the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability notes that misconduct complaints stemming from the George Floyd protests include:

    i. Pepper spraying a young girl;

    ii. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested;

    iii. Placing a knee on the neck area of two people who had been arrested;

    iv. Covering up badge numbers;

    v. Failing to record law enforcement activity on body-worn video;

    vi. Pepper spraying peaceful protesters;

    vii. The use of flashbangs, including causing a significant thumb injury;

    viii. Failing to secure rifles in the rear of a patrol vehicle;

    ix. Punching a person on the ground who was being arrested; and

    x. Officers breaking windows of a Target store; and

    WHEREAS, a June 5, 2020 letter to Mayor Durkan and Chief Best from the Seattle Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Community Police Commission, and Seattle Office of the Inspector General for Public Safety recommends the immediate cessation of CS gas, otherwise known as tear gas; NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS:

    Section 1. A new Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 3.28 as follows:

    3.28.146 Prohibition of the use of crowd control weapons

    A. Unless exempted or excepted, no City department shall own, purchase, rent, store or use crowd control weapons.

    B. Law enforcement agencies operating under mutual aid agreements are prohibited from using crowd control weapons while rendering aid to the Seattle Police Department or acting in an official capacity within Seattle.

    C. As used in this Section 3.28.146, “crowd control weapons” means kinetic impact projectiles, chemical irritants, acoustic weapons, directed energy weapons, water cannons, disorientation devices, ultrasonic cannons, or any other device that is designed to be used on multiple individuals for crowd control and has the potential to cause pain or discomfort.

    D. Oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray is not a crowd control weapon for purposes of owning, purchasing, renting, or storing under subsection 3.28.146.A. Use of OC spray is prohibited under subsection 3.28.146.A if:

    1. It is used in a demonstration, rally, or other First Amendment-protected event; or

    2. When used to subdue an individual in the process of committing a criminal act or presenting an imminent danger to others, it lands on anyone other than that individual.

    E. A person shall have a right of action against the City for physical or emotional injuries proximately caused by the use of crowd control weapons against that person.

    F. Absent evidence establishing a greater amount of damages, the damages payable to an individual for injuries proximately caused in violation of this Section 3.28.146 shall be $10,000, added to attorney fees and court fees.



    Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020.

    Passed by the City Council the ________ day of _________________________, 2020, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    President ____________ of the City Council

    Approved by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Jenny A. Durkan, Mayor

    Filed by me this ________ day of _________________________, 2020.

    ____________________________________

    Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk

    (Seal)

    Am I reading this wrong, or

    If a cop sprays pepper spray on someone committing a criminal act but also gets himself with a bit of spray, the criminal gets to sue.

    A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
This discussion has been closed.