Please raise your hands in the air and channel your Business Energy towards me
this one is tough for me because usually when I'm instructed to raise my hands in the air, the next step is to wave them like I just don't care. but in this case i care very much! so i did it, but i'm not sure if it worked, hopefully your interview goes well either way!
Please raise your hands in the air and channel your Business Energy towards me
this one is tough for me because usually when I'm instructed to raise my hands in the air, the next step is to wave them like I just don't care. but in this case i care very much! so i did it, but i'm not sure if it worked, hopefully your interview goes well either way!
This would not have happened if the kid were white.
That's really all it is to it. At every step of the process: the police being called in the first place; the police charging the kid; the judge not summarily dismissing the charges... a white child would have been treated with the leniency and sympathy that all children deserve.
Instead this kid is going to have a record before they're even in double digits, and that's going to predispose authority figures in his life to dismiss them as a lost cause already. The rest of this child's life is going to be an uphill battle because of this, and systemic racism is such that this injustice will only enable/justify countless more against them.
Just because something is legal doesnt mean you arent an asshole for doing it. Likewise, just because something is illegal, doesnt mean you are a criminal that must be charged.
I've no doubt the person that called also loudly complains about any speeding tickets they get.
i am really amazed the judge didn't throw it out and fine the cop and the person who called. i would have given them both jail time and let the kid spray them with a hose the whole time
+7
Kane Red RobeMaster of MagicArcanusRegistered Userregular
The judge did throw out the case on that one, still a travesty that they dragged the kid to court though. Who the fuck arrests a kid for picking a flower? (Sadly I am familiar with the kind of person who would call the cops on a kid for "vandalizing their property").
The judge did throw out the case on that one, still a travesty that they dragged the kid to court though. Who the fuck arrests a kid for picking a flower? (Sadly I am familiar with the kind of person who would call the cops on a kid for "vandalizing their property").
Somehow we have more stories like this than "cop called to break up kids playing hockey joins kids to play hocky", hmmmmmm, surely no reason behind it.
The judge did throw out the case on that one, still a travesty that they dragged the kid to court though. Who the fuck arrests a kid for picking a flower? (Sadly I am familiar with the kind of person who would call the cops on a kid for "vandalizing their property").
Do you have a link on the judge throwing the case out? It's not in the articles I've seen.
The judge did throw out the case on that one, still a travesty that they dragged the kid to court though. Who the fuck arrests a kid for picking a flower? (Sadly I am familiar with the kind of person who would call the cops on a kid for "vandalizing their property").
Do you have a link on the judge throwing the case out? It's not in the articles I've seen.
The 6-year-old accused of picking the tulip ended up before a judge because his mother couldn't make the intake meeting. Once the judge realized what was happening, he dismissed the case, said Boyer.
Pathetic that despite multiple tiers of law enforcement that handled the case before it went to a judge, it wasn't dropped until that last moment. Like seriously, of the dozens of people who probably reviewed that case before it went before the judge not one of them said, "hold up, WTF is going on here???"
Pathetic that despite multiple tiers of law enforcement that handled the case before it went to a judge, it wasn't dropped until that last moment. Like seriously, of the dozens of people who probably reviewed that case before it went before the judge not one of them said, "hold up, WTF is going on here???"
Greenlight everything I put on your desk or you're fired.
I don't care what it is, I got a quota to meet.
If you cannot tell, I am implying that legal cases are treated the same as order picking at amazon fulfillment centers. That one must be complicit in this to have a career in a prosecutor's office or be exiled for people with better rates.
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday expanded the ability of people to sue police for excessive force, ruling in favor of a New Mexico woman who filed a civil rights lawsuit after being shot by officers she had mistaken for carjackers.
The 5-3 decision allowed the woman, Roxanne Torres, to pursue her lawsuit accusing New Mexico State Police officers Richard Williamson and Janice Madrid of violating the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment ban on illegal searches and seizures even though she had not been immediately detained, or seized, in the incident.
The court determined that in order to sue for excessive force under the Fourth Amendment, it is not necessary for a plaintiff to have been physically seized by law enforcement.
“We hold that the application of physical force to the body of a person with intent to restrain is a seizure even if the person does not submit and is not subdued,” conservative Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the ruling.
FFXIV: Agran Trask
+4
Ubikoh pete, that's later. maybe we'll be dead by thenRegistered Userregular
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday expanded the ability of people to sue police for excessive force, ruling in favor of a New Mexico woman who filed a civil rights lawsuit after being shot by officers she had mistaken for carjackers.
The 5-3 decision allowed the woman, Roxanne Torres, to pursue her lawsuit accusing New Mexico State Police officers Richard Williamson and Janice Madrid of violating the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment ban on illegal searches and seizures even though she had not been immediately detained, or seized, in the incident.
The court determined that in order to sue for excessive force under the Fourth Amendment, it is not necessary for a plaintiff to have been physically seized by law enforcement.
“We hold that the application of physical force to the body of a person with intent to restrain is a seizure even if the person does not submit and is not subdued,” conservative Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the ruling.
The case stemmed from a 2014 incident involving Roxanne Torres and two New Mexico State Police officers tasked with executing an arrest warrant on another woman at an apartment complex. The officers attempted to speak to Torres and a third (unrelated) woman during the process of serving the warrant. Torres had just gotten into her car in the complex parking lot. When officers tried to open her door, she assumed the officers were carjackers, so she fled. Officers fired a total of 13 shots to stymie her escape — hitting her twice — but Torres still managed to drive 75 miles to a hospital.
i don't know much about the case but it sounds like another situation where she wasn't even involved in the reason the police were there in the first place
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday expanded the ability of people to sue police for excessive force, ruling in favor of a New Mexico woman who filed a civil rights lawsuit after being shot by officers she had mistaken for carjackers.
The 5-3 decision allowed the woman, Roxanne Torres, to pursue her lawsuit accusing New Mexico State Police officers Richard Williamson and Janice Madrid of violating the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment ban on illegal searches and seizures even though she had not been immediately detained, or seized, in the incident.
The court determined that in order to sue for excessive force under the Fourth Amendment, it is not necessary for a plaintiff to have been physically seized by law enforcement.
“We hold that the application of physical force to the body of a person with intent to restrain is a seizure even if the person does not submit and is not subdued,” conservative Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the ruling.
The case stemmed from a 2014 incident involving Roxanne Torres and two New Mexico State Police officers tasked with executing an arrest warrant on another woman at an apartment complex. The officers attempted to speak to Torres and a third (unrelated) woman during the process of serving the warrant. Torres had just gotten into her car in the complex parking lot. When officers tried to open her door, she assumed the officers were carjackers, so she fled. Officers fired a total of 13 shots to stymie her escape — hitting her twice — but Torres still managed to drive 75 miles to a hospital.
i don't know much about the case but it sounds like another situation where she wasn't even involved in the reason the police were there in the first place
Also once again the cop response to person driving away from them is attempted murder
Why...why did the police fire at a fleeing vehicle at all? Shooting people in the back is...like, they literally can't be a threat in that situation.
you must not be american. cops here shoot people running away all the time
And, it should be noted, they're not supposed to even by the ridiculous standards in the US. The bar almost literally couldn't be lower for them and they still make it under.
What's crazy to me is that she was shot in 2014. It's 2021 and she is still having to deal with legal bullshit from it. This case isn't even the end of it. All it does is allow her other suit to proceed. Who knows how long that will take.
Why...why did the police fire at a fleeing vehicle at all? Shooting people in the back is...like, they literally can't be a threat in that situation.
you must not be american. cops here shoot people running away all the time
And, it should be noted, they're not supposed to even by the ridiculous standards in the US. The bar almost literally couldn't be lower for them and they still make it under.
They are never punished for doing it so why would they not do it
Why...why did the police fire at a fleeing vehicle at all? Shooting people in the back is...like, they literally can't be a threat in that situation.
you must not be american. cops here shoot people running away all the time
And, it should be noted, they're not supposed to even by the ridiculous standards in the US. The bar almost literally couldn't be lower for them and they still make it under.
They are never punished for doing it so why would they not do it
a black Georgia state representative, Rep. Cannon, is being literally dragged out of their capitol building by state troopers while the Georgian assembly is in session, charged with felony obstruction of justice for knocking on the governor's door to observe him signing a bill to ratfuck their voting process somehow or other.
It hit me that the top sheriff incident over the the newpaper delivery person is extra embarassing for the county and office because that is supposed to be the one person they can count on to act responsibly
Posts
yes
Please raise your hands in the air and channel your Business Energy towards me
3DS Friend Code: 0216-0898-6512
Switch Friend Code: SW-7437-1538-7786
i have no business energy but i will send you over caffeinated need to poop energy instead
this one is tough for me because usually when I'm instructed to raise my hands in the air, the next step is to wave them like I just don't care. but in this case i care very much! so i did it, but i'm not sure if it worked, hopefully your interview goes well either way!
you just wave them in reverse
3DS Friend Code: 0216-0898-6512
Switch Friend Code: SW-7437-1538-7786
The tulip did nothing wrong except create a economic disaster in 1637, which again, wasn't its fault!
yeah but it laughed while it happened so....
This would not have happened if the kid were white.
That's really all it is to it. At every step of the process: the police being called in the first place; the police charging the kid; the judge not summarily dismissing the charges... a white child would have been treated with the leniency and sympathy that all children deserve.
Instead this kid is going to have a record before they're even in double digits, and that's going to predispose authority figures in his life to dismiss them as a lost cause already. The rest of this child's life is going to be an uphill battle because of this, and systemic racism is such that this injustice will only enable/justify countless more against them.
Gamertag: PrimusD | Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
I've no doubt the person that called also loudly complains about any speeding tickets they get.
Somehow we have more stories like this than "cop called to break up kids playing hockey joins kids to play hocky", hmmmmmm, surely no reason behind it.
Second reason, officers punished for not meeting quotas
http://www.fallout3nexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=16534
"Injury to real property"
Eat my whole ass.
Do you have a link on the judge throwing the case out? It's not in the articles I've seen.
Gamertag: PrimusD | Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
https://journalnow.com/north-carolina-sends-6-year-olds-to-court-why-some-say-its-time-for-change/article_e2a15a82-8383-11eb-91ee-43ce7c88753b.html
http://www.fallout3nexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=16534
Gamertag: PrimusD | Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
Law enforcement is racist at all levels
Meanwhile, in another state, a DA decides it's not worth charging anyone for murdering Breonna Taylor in her sleep.
If you cannot tell, I am implying that legal cases are treated the same as order picking at amazon fulfillment centers. That one must be complicit in this to have a career in a prosecutor's office or be exiled for people with better rates.
http://www.fallout3nexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=16534
I can basically promise you the DA has zero involvement in the flower picking case.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-police-idUSKBN2BH2I5
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/scotus-cites-centuries-old-case-where-countess-was-arrested-at-mace-point-as-analogue-to-police-shooting/?utm_source=mostpopular
i don't know much about the case but it sounds like another situation where she wasn't even involved in the reason the police were there in the first place
Also once again the cop response to person driving away from them is attempted murder
They've seen it on the tv
you must not be american. cops here shoot people running away all the time
And, it should be noted, they're not supposed to even by the ridiculous standards in the US. The bar almost literally couldn't be lower for them and they still make it under.
3DS: 0473-8507-2652
Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
PSN: AbEntropy
Our system is so broken.
They are never punished for doing it so why would they not do it
Gamertag: PrimusD | Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
Absolute power corrupts absolutely, yes.
3DS: 0473-8507-2652
Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
PSN: AbEntropy
a black Georgia state representative, Rep. Cannon, is being literally dragged out of their capitol building by state troopers while the Georgian assembly is in session, charged with felony obstruction of justice for knocking on the governor's door to observe him signing a bill to ratfuck their voting process somehow or other.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better
bit.ly/2XQM1ke
Fuckin of course
Georgia y'all!
http://www.fallout3nexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=16534