There is a new Ghostbusters trailer. Watch the beginning. Really, it is just the beginning that is new. https://youtu.be/CiaZ1Z4ZJoM
Ugh. Everything about this looks like it was designed by a committee.
Probably.
At least it kind of looks like a movie instead of 2 hours of comedians ad-libbing for the camera.
It looks like they spraypainted a nominal Ghostbusters skin onto a rejected Stranger Things episode vomited out by an AI trained entirely on market research surveys and focus groups
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
There is a new Ghostbusters trailer. Watch the beginning. Really, it is just the beginning that is new. https://youtu.be/CiaZ1Z4ZJoM
Ugh. Everything about this looks like it was designed by a committee.
Probably.
At least it kind of looks like a movie instead of 2 hours of comedians ad-libbing for the camera.
It looks like they spraypainted a nominal Ghostbusters skin onto a rejected Stranger Things episode vomited out by an AI trained entirely on market research surveys and focus groups
I mean, I'm glad that Finn Wolfhard is getting work and all, but he's definitely becoming the "Supernatural Forces" cliche typecast teen.
+3
Options
SummaryJudgmentGrab the hottest iron you can find, stride in the Tower’s front doorRegistered Userregular
There is a new Ghostbusters trailer. Watch the beginning. Really, it is just the beginning that is new. https://youtu.be/CiaZ1Z4ZJoM
Ugh. Everything about this looks like it was designed by a committee.
Probably.
At least it kind of looks like a movie instead of 2 hours of comedians ad-libbing for the camera.
It looks like they spraypainted a nominal Ghostbusters skin onto a rejected Stranger Things episode vomited out by an AI trained entirely on market research surveys and focus groups
I mean, I'm glad that Finn Wolfhard is getting work and all, but he's definitely becoming the "Supernatural Forces" cliche typecast teen.
I feel like him, Asa Butterfield, and others in that boat all need to go get a beer
Chris Mintz-Plasse maybe? Christ, Superbad was a long time ago.
SummaryJudgment on
Some days Blue wonders why anyone ever bothered making numbers so small; other days she supposes even infinity needs to start somewhere.
There is a new Ghostbusters trailer. Watch the beginning. Really, it is just the beginning that is new. https://youtu.be/CiaZ1Z4ZJoM
Ugh. Everything about this looks like it was designed by a committee.
Probably.
At least it kind of looks like a movie instead of 2 hours of comedians ad-libbing for the camera.
It looks like they spraypainted a nominal Ghostbusters skin onto a rejected Stranger Things episode vomited out by an AI trained entirely on market research surveys and focus groups
Paul Rudd looks like a knockoff Keanu Reaves.
"I will write your name in the ruin of them. I will paint you across history in the color of their blood."
There is a new Ghostbusters trailer. Watch the beginning. Really, it is just the beginning that is new. https://youtu.be/CiaZ1Z4ZJoM
Ugh. Everything about this looks like it was designed by a committee.
Probably.
At least it kind of looks like a movie instead of 2 hours of comedians ad-libbing for the camera.
It looks like they spraypainted a nominal Ghostbusters skin onto a rejected Stranger Things episode vomited out by an AI trained entirely on market research surveys and focus groups
I mean, I'm glad that Finn Wolfhard is getting work and all, but he's definitely becoming the "Supernatural Forces" cliche typecast teen.
I feel like him, Asa Butterfield, and others in that boat all need to go get a beer
Chris Mintz-Plasse maybe? Christ, Superbad was a long time ago.
I think Asa Butterfield is doing fine. He's fantastic in "Sex Education"
+2
Options
TraceGNU Terry Pratchett; GNU Gus; GNU Carrie Fisher; GNU Adam WeRegistered Userregular
There is a new Ghostbusters trailer. Watch the beginning. Really, it is just the beginning that is new. https://youtu.be/CiaZ1Z4ZJoM
Ugh. Everything about this looks like it was designed by a committee.
Probably.
At least it kind of looks like a movie instead of 2 hours of comedians ad-libbing for the camera.
It looks like they spraypainted a nominal Ghostbusters skin onto a rejected Stranger Things episode vomited out by an AI trained entirely on market research surveys and focus groups
Paul Rudd looks like a knockoff Keanu Reaves.
In that both of them look eternally young? Yes.
+3
Options
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
There is a new Ghostbusters trailer. Watch the beginning. Really, it is just the beginning that is new. https://youtu.be/CiaZ1Z4ZJoM
Ugh. Everything about this looks like it was designed by a committee.
Probably.
At least it kind of looks like a movie instead of 2 hours of comedians ad-libbing for the camera.
It looks like they spraypainted a nominal Ghostbusters skin onto a rejected Stranger Things episode vomited out by an AI trained entirely on market research surveys and focus groups
Which I'd still take over yet another failed attempt to recreate Superbad.
Honestly, what bothers me about that trailer is that it rubs me the wrong way to have Paul Rudd as an obvious fan-insert, directly quoting the 1984 movie as he stares agape at 80s memorabilia. It's very Ready Player One 'memberberries. "Hey, 'member Ecto-1?"
I assume the trailer isn't indicative of the finished film, though, because the trailer also doesn't look like a comedy. Other than the tiny marshmallow man shenanigans, nothing comical happens in that trailer. So maybe Paul Rudd being a fanboy is a relatively minor aspect.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
Honestly, what bothers me about that trailer is that it rubs me the wrong way to have Paul Rudd as an obvious fan-insert, directly quoting the 1984 movie as he stares agape at 80s memorabilia. It's very Ready Player One 'memberberries. "Hey, 'member Ecto-1?"
I assume the trailer isn't indicative of the finished film, though, because the trailer also doesn't look like a comedy. Other than the tiny marshmallow man shenanigans, nothing comical happens in that trailer. So maybe Paul Rudd being a fanboy is a relatively minor aspect.
I'm hoping this one learns two things from the original:
1. Tight scripting and good scripted jokes will land just fine and should be done, whereas amazing ad-libs that come out of nowhere from the actors can make it better but should not be relied on.
2. Tone it down with the creepy sex pest stuff
If they can hit both of these and remain reasonably creepy (the first was actually not nearly as cartoony as the rest of the stuff made out of the IP), I'll be ok with it.
Honestly, what bothers me about that trailer is that it rubs me the wrong way to have Paul Rudd as an obvious fan-insert, directly quoting the 1984 movie as he stares agape at 80s memorabilia. It's very Ready Player One 'memberberries. "Hey, 'member Ecto-1?"
I assume the trailer isn't indicative of the finished film, though, because the trailer also doesn't look like a comedy. Other than the tiny marshmallow man shenanigans, nothing comical happens in that trailer. So maybe Paul Rudd being a fanboy is a relatively minor aspect.
I'm hoping this one learns two things from the original:
1. Tight scripting and good scripted jokes will land just fine and should be done, whereas amazing ad-libs that come out of nowhere from the actors can make it better but should not be relied on.
2. Tone it down with the creepy sex pest stuff
If they can hit both of these and remain reasonably creepy (the first was actually not nearly as cartoony as the rest of the stuff made out of the IP), I'll be ok with it.
i liked 2016 Ghostbusters even if parts of it were extremely stupid
Yeah. I thought it was fine. It needed a different actor playing the villain and maybe one more pass on the screenplay, but it wasn't Highlander 2 bad.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
lifehack: if you don't shoot a bow like this you're a fucking idiot
This motherfucker has another video where he curves arrows around shit
For what it's worth Lars is completely hated in every single archery community, and the biggest claim to fame of Hollywood embracing his shit was that he was the technical advisor for that Taron Edgerton(?) Jamie Foxx robin hood movie.
For what it's worth Lars is completely hated in every single archery community, and the biggest claim to fame of Hollywood embracing his shit was that he was the technical advisor for that Taron Edgerton(?) Jamie Foxx robin hood movie.
Why? Just curious.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
0
Options
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
Posts
Something about the invocation of a “jiffy lube pavilion” is so specific
I want to get high at the pavilion now
It looks like they spraypainted a nominal Ghostbusters skin onto a rejected Stranger Things episode vomited out by an AI trained entirely on market research surveys and focus groups
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
I mean, I'm glad that Finn Wolfhard is getting work and all, but he's definitely becoming the "Supernatural Forces" cliche typecast teen.
I feel like him, Asa Butterfield, and others in that boat all need to go get a beer
Chris Mintz-Plasse maybe? Christ, Superbad was a long time ago.
Bow is cool and all but did you see the part where he on-the-spot crafts a bandolier out of a nearby vine for stringing his catches onto??
i didn't even know it's not Nissan Pavilion anymore
that's where i saw Nine Inch Nails and David Bowie on my 15th birthday
Shit that would be a great show
I saw them and Jane's Addiction back in '08 but I wasn't as much into Jane's
Paul Rudd looks like a knockoff Keanu Reaves.
The Monster Baru Cormorant - Seth Dickinson
Steam: Korvalain
lifehack: if you don't shoot a bow like this you're a fucking idiot
it was amazing
i would have loved to see jane's addiction around the same time. not sure how they held up by 2008 heh
Archers are LOSING IT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCiI39JFudo
In that both of them look eternally young? Yes.
Which I'd still take over yet another failed attempt to recreate Superbad.
Rival Crimea and Ryazan and attack in December 44
I assume the trailer isn't indicative of the finished film, though, because the trailer also doesn't look like a comedy. Other than the tiny marshmallow man shenanigans, nothing comical happens in that trailer. So maybe Paul Rudd being a fanboy is a relatively minor aspect.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
It kinda gives the impression Gozer might be back in some way or some kind of energy from Gozer. Maybe I am reading too much into it.
This motherfucker has another video where he curves arrows around shit
It's a psyop to convince us that Ghostbusters 2016 was good
I'm hoping this one learns two things from the original:
1. Tight scripting and good scripted jokes will land just fine and should be done, whereas amazing ad-libs that come out of nowhere from the actors can make it better but should not be relied on.
2. Tone it down with the creepy sex pest stuff
If they can hit both of these and remain reasonably creepy (the first was actually not nearly as cartoony as the rest of the stuff made out of the IP), I'll be ok with it.
and it's actually just the first Ghostbusters with nothing changed
the future is going to be amazing
Meh, it's got Paul Rudd.
I'll watch it.
Yeah. I thought it was fine. It needed a different actor playing the villain and maybe one more pass on the screenplay, but it wasn't Highlander 2 bad.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
https://youtu.be/JKWW5-jr5Y0
For what it's worth Lars is completely hated in every single archery community, and the biggest claim to fame of Hollywood embracing his shit was that he was the technical advisor for that Taron Edgerton(?) Jamie Foxx robin hood movie.
I'm guessing that beam of light we saw shoot out of the ground was from the containment unit, long buried and now failing.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Words I just said with disbelief.
Why? Just curious.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Also the giant paw slamming down on the car hood which I took as one of the doggos