Having problems registering on Coin Return? Please email support@coin-return.org, and include your PA username and PIN.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to join us.

Tag Suggestions

13

Posts

  • minor incidentminor incident publicly subsidized! privately profitable!Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Tef wrote: »
    Hi it’s me again, planting the flag for the [establishment politics] and [disestablishment politics] tags again. It cleanly delineates the base assumptions that make our politics discussions so acrimonious. I’m convinced, if we also have the [news] and [analysis] and [support] splits, we have strong foundations to manage how we want to interact with each other

    Yeah, I personally like this as a broad dividing line for political threads because I think the sort of "DND Politics" threads and "SE Politics" threads we usually see slot pretty well into one of the other, so it's a good way to keep the general flavor of each without absolutely mashing together the most contentious spaces on the forums.

    Hell, New Jersey, it said on the letter. Delivered without comment. So be it!
  • PhyphorPhyphor Building Planet Busters Tasting FruitRegistered User regular
    Is having Phalla and TTRPG PbPs in the same subforum actually logical now that I think about it?

    Phallas are in CF on the current forums, but they're really not that related to analog games aside from taking the core DNA from Mafia.

    Maybe they should actually be in the chat subforum or something?

    I dunno. A lot of forums I see have a separate 'forum games' section where there's no serious discussion happening.

    Looking back at it, it seems a little strange that we include it in the same subforum as people discussing the latest D&D or Warhammer rules.

    Ehh, it's close enough. They are threads that are limited exclusively to active players. I don't think that boardgames, mafia and TTRPG are really fundamentally different types of threads

  • DelzhandDelzhand Coin Return Admin Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Delzhand wrote: »
    I might be able to do a simple parse of titles for matching brackets and replacing them with <span> tags that have some style by default, leaving the actual tags for search/filter/ignore

    I regret to inform you all that this isn't feasible in XF.

  • MvrckMvrck Dwarven MountainhomeRegistered User regular
    Delzhand wrote: »
    Delzhand wrote: »
    I might be able to do a simple parse of titles for matching brackets and replacing them with <span> tags that have some style by default, leaving the actual tags for search/filter/ignore

    I regret to inform you all that this isn't feasible in XF.

    That's pretty surprising. What's the major obstacle there?

  • DelzhandDelzhand Coin Return Admin Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Here are the obstacles to doing it server-side:
    • The thread entity structure definition includes columns and getters
    • Columns pull values straight from the db
    • Getters are function calls
    • Columns can't be renamed
    • Columns can't be replaced by getters if you need the column value (so we can't override $thread->title with a function because we still need $thread->title as a value within the function)
    • HTML isn't enabled in thread titles

    With these constraints in mind, the only solution is:
    1. Create a getter called tagtitle that uses a function to swap the brackets for spans
    2. Create a Template Modification for every template that displays a thread title (there are a lot of them) that replaces $thread->title with $thread->tagtitle|raw

    If we reduce the scope of pseudo-tags to just the main thread listing it's not too bad, we'd need to take some manual precautions against malicious HTML entered into thread titles, but there's no singular place we can fix it and see the results everywhere it winds up getting rendered.

  • MvrckMvrck Dwarven MountainhomeRegistered User regular
    Delzhand wrote: »
    Here are the obstacles to doing it server-side:
    • The thread entity structure definition includes columns and getters
    • Columns pull values straight from the db
    • Getters are function calls
    • Columns can't be renamed
    • Columns can't be replaced by getters if you need the column value (so we can't override $thread->title with a function because we still need $thread->title as a value within the function)
    • HTML isn't enabled in thread titles

    With these constraints in mind, the only solution is:
    1. Create a getter called tagtitle that uses a function to swap the brackets for spans
    2. Create a Template Modification for every template that displays a thread title (there are a lot of them) that replaces $thread->title with $thread->tagtitle|raw

    If we reduce the scope of pseudo-tags to just the main thread listing it's not too bad, we'd need to take some manual precautions against malicious HTML entered into thread titles, but there's no singular place we can fix it and see the results everywhere it winds up getting rendered.

    Huh. Maybe it actually is worthwhile to just throw it in Javascript on the front end then? It wouldn't be particularly heavy code wise, just won't work for anyone with JS disabled.

  • DibbitDibbit Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Mvrck wrote: »
    Delzhand wrote: »
    Here are the obstacles to doing it server-side:
    • The thread entity structure definition includes columns and getters
    • Columns pull values straight from the db
    • Getters are function calls
    • Columns can't be renamed
    • Columns can't be replaced by getters if you need the column value (so we can't override $thread->title with a function because we still need $thread->title as a value within the function)
    • HTML isn't enabled in thread titles

    With these constraints in mind, the only solution is:
    1. Create a getter called tagtitle that uses a function to swap the brackets for spans
    2. Create a Template Modification for every template that displays a thread title (there are a lot of them) that replaces $thread->title with $thread->tagtitle|raw

    If we reduce the scope of pseudo-tags to just the main thread listing it's not too bad, we'd need to take some manual precautions against malicious HTML entered into thread titles, but there's no singular place we can fix it and see the results everywhere it winds up getting rendered.

    Huh. Maybe it actually is worthwhile to just throw it in Javascript on the front end then? It wouldn't be particularly heavy code wise, just won't work for anyone with JS disabled.

    Do any sites still work well with javascript disabled?
    I know that used to be a thing, but nowadays everything is so reliant on it.

  • discriderdiscrider Registered User regular
    Just got to this thread.

    I'm thinking if we want a robust 'ignore thread' function we really need tags for each general thread topic, as well as the general genre News/PbP/chat etc ones.

    Like if I don't like Magic: the Gathering, it would be cool to block the [MtG] tag and never see any of those threads ever again.
    And maybe that's cause I spent too much money on cardboard and I don't want to relapse, or maybe it's because I only play it to hurt myself and that doesn't jive with the conversation in that thread, or maybe it's because I just want to make space for other threads whose topic interests me, or whatever.

    But I do think that people have been removing themselves so as to block out specific threads, through self-bans and the like, that having topical tags that can be ignored is rather something that should be included in the forum from day one.

  • minor incidentminor incident publicly subsidized! privately profitable!Registered User, Transition Team regular
    I believe Delz is looking into the ability to ignore/hide specific threads on a case by case basis, which would eliminate the need for each thread topic to have an ultra specific tag

    Hell, New Jersey, it said on the letter. Delivered without comment. So be it!
  • ChicoBlueChicoBlue Registered User regular
    Could you implement a

    [GOOD]

    thread tag so that I know which threads are good to read?

  • discriderdiscrider Registered User regular
    I believe Delz is looking into the ability to ignore/hide specific threads on a case by case basis, which would eliminate the need for each thread topic to have an ultra specific tag

    Well, are threads getting recycled at 100 pages?

    Because if we are closing threads when they get too long (something that I also think is a good idea to help people jump into threads for the first time), then we're still exposing people to those threads unwillingly each time they're recreated.
    And that would be solved with specific ignorable tags following the thread each time it is renewed.

  • XaquinXaquin Right behind you!Registered User regular
    I suggest [Freeze] and [TV] tags

  • DelzhandDelzhand Coin Return Admin Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited January 22
    My primary direct is to, as much as is feasible, allow people to engage with people and content in the manner of their choosing.

    https://xenforo.com/community/resources/ignore-content.6538/
    Take control of your experience: ignore forums, threads, tags, conversations, and users with ease.

    Ignore Forums

    Allows users to ignore specific forums and hide their content.
    Ignored forums will not appear in view.

    Ignore Threads

    Lets users hide unwanted threads from their view.
    Personalizes experience by allowing users to focus on content they care about.

    Ignore Tags

    Enables users to ignore specific tags and hide related content.
    Ideal for users not interested in specific topics or categories.

    Ignore Conversations

    Gives users the ability to block specific conversations and keep them hidden.
    Avoids conversations that are not relevant or of interest.

    Ignore Users

    Allows users to ignore other users and hide their content.
    Ignored users' content will not show in various locations: widgets, newsfeeds, find news, forum listing, alerts, profile posts, etc...
    Ideal for avoiding content from users who consistently post material that is not of interest or is potentially offensive.

    Conversation Blockers

    Gives users the power to block unwanted conversations, ensuring they never see them again.
    Avoids conversations that are repetitive, spammy, or irrelevant.

    Privacy: Allow Ignored User to View User Profile

    Provides users with the option to allow ignored users to view their profile while keeping their content hidden.
    Gives users full control over their privacy.

    Statistics for Forum Owner

    Provides valuable statistics and insights into how users interact with the platform.
    Better understanding of user behavior for informed decisions.

    Permission Controlled

    All features of the add-on are permission-controlled.
    Ensures platform remains safe and user-friendly for all users.

    This is the backbone of that plan. It's going to take some testing to figure out whether this covers people's bases. If you have specific scenarios you want me to investigate, please let me know.

    Edit: I might actually make this a new thread. It's kind of related to tags, but it's related to a lot of other stuff, too.

    Delzhand on
  • QuetziQuetzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User, Moderator mod
    discrider wrote: »
    I believe Delz is looking into the ability to ignore/hide specific threads on a case by case basis, which would eliminate the need for each thread topic to have an ultra specific tag

    Well, are threads getting recycled at 100 pages?

    Because if we are closing threads when they get too long (something that I also think is a good idea to help people jump into threads for the first time), then we're still exposing people to those threads unwillingly each time they're recreated.
    And that would be solved with specific ignorable tags following the thread each time it is renewed.

    How often does the MtG thread get recreated? Like, is the lift of having to tag a topic and manage topic tags worth it?

  • minor incidentminor incident publicly subsidized! privately profitable!Registered User, Transition Team regular
    The current one was just recycled today, after around 7 months. Even the more fast moving threads like politics can last a month or two, but the majority of threads will last even longer -- some of them years.

    I think there's some weight to what discrider is asking, but also, while one of our main goals has been to enable everyone to customize their experience on Coin Return to their preference as much as possible, there are certain things where we just have to balance the practicality and logistics. Requiring every thread to have a unique topical tag is a big ask, and will mostly unnecessary clutter to the tag list, which could hinder the more practical, every day uses for tagging. As much as I empathize, I think that having to re-ignore a topic a couple of times a year when the thread respawns isn't the biggest ask of the minority of folks who might want it always out of sight.

    But also, we'll keep digging into our options and looking into what capabilities we can employ with addons like the one Delz linked above -- maybe we'll find some other options that might make it even more painless for everyone.

    Hell, New Jersey, it said on the letter. Delivered without comment. So be it!
  • discriderdiscrider Registered User regular
    Quetzi wrote: »
    discrider wrote: »
    I believe Delz is looking into the ability to ignore/hide specific threads on a case by case basis, which would eliminate the need for each thread topic to have an ultra specific tag

    Well, are threads getting recycled at 100 pages?

    Because if we are closing threads when they get too long (something that I also think is a good idea to help people jump into threads for the first time), then we're still exposing people to those threads unwillingly each time they're recreated.
    And that would be solved with specific ignorable tags following the thread each time it is renewed.

    How often does the MtG thread get recreated? Like, is the lift of having to tag a topic and manage topic tags worth it?

    It would depend on the topic and the activity in the thread.

    To pick a less me example, we're heading into a Trump presidency, and I can imagine some people wanting to disengage with news on awful-thing-Trump-did-today.
    I would expect such threads to maybe clock up 100 pages in a week during busy times.

  • DibbitDibbit Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited January 22
    discrider wrote: »
    I believe Delz is looking into the ability to ignore/hide specific threads on a case by case basis, which would eliminate the need for each thread topic to have an ultra specific tag

    Well, are threads getting recycled at 100 pages?

    Because if we are closing threads when they get too long (something that I also think is a good idea to help people jump into threads for the first time), then we're still exposing people to those threads unwillingly each time they're recreated.
    And that would be solved with specific ignorable tags following the thread each time it is renewed.

    There has been talks of having some page limit, (and 100 pages was a popular one) This was to prevent megathreads that can be very intimidating. A way to recycle threads is in the works, because this is not supposed to be a burden.
    So, it's "in the works"

    Dibbit on
  • minor incidentminor incident publicly subsidized! privately profitable!Registered User, Transition Team regular
    discrider wrote: »
    Quetzi wrote: »
    discrider wrote: »
    I believe Delz is looking into the ability to ignore/hide specific threads on a case by case basis, which would eliminate the need for each thread topic to have an ultra specific tag

    Well, are threads getting recycled at 100 pages?

    Because if we are closing threads when they get too long (something that I also think is a good idea to help people jump into threads for the first time), then we're still exposing people to those threads unwillingly each time they're recreated.
    And that would be solved with specific ignorable tags following the thread each time it is renewed.

    How often does the MtG thread get recreated? Like, is the lift of having to tag a topic and manage topic tags worth it?

    It would depend on the topic and the activity in the thread.

    To pick a less me example, we're heading into a Trump presidency, and I can imagine some people wanting to disengage with news on awful-thing-Trump-did-today.
    I would expect such threads to maybe clock up 100 pages in a week during busy times.

    In those instances, I would think a "Politics" tag ignore would work pretty well. Or it's probably also reasonable to have a "Trump" (or similar) tag on politics threads focused around the current administration since there would likely be several threads with slightly different focuses and scopes.

    Hell, New Jersey, it said on the letter. Delivered without comment. So be it!
  • DibbitDibbit Registered User, Transition Team regular
    discrider wrote: »
    Quetzi wrote: »
    discrider wrote: »
    I believe Delz is looking into the ability to ignore/hide specific threads on a case by case basis, which would eliminate the need for each thread topic to have an ultra specific tag

    Well, are threads getting recycled at 100 pages?

    Because if we are closing threads when they get too long (something that I also think is a good idea to help people jump into threads for the first time), then we're still exposing people to those threads unwillingly each time they're recreated.
    And that would be solved with specific ignorable tags following the thread each time it is renewed.

    How often does the MtG thread get recreated? Like, is the lift of having to tag a topic and manage topic tags worth it?

    It would depend on the topic and the activity in the thread.

    To pick a less me example, we're heading into a Trump presidency, and I can imagine some people wanting to disengage with news on awful-thing-Trump-did-today.
    I would expect such threads to maybe clock up 100 pages in a week during busy times.

    In those instances, I would think a "Politics" tag ignore would work pretty well. Or it's probably also reasonable to have a "Trump" (or similar) tag on politics threads focused around the current administration since there would likely be several threads with slightly different focuses and scopes.

    You're not wrong, but it's galling that "Trump" would get his own tag.

  • minor incidentminor incident publicly subsidized! privately profitable!Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Could always just go with "That Asshole"

    Hell, New Jersey, it said on the letter. Delivered without comment. So be it!
  • ToxTox I kill threads Dilige, et quod vis facRegistered User regular
    Could always just go with "That Asshole"

    No nicknames please

    maybe the real panopticon was the friends we made along the way
  • discriderdiscrider Registered User regular
    The problem with [Politics] is it would presumably also adorn say the AUS/NZ thread, and the UK thread, both of which are unlikely to be centered around Trump.

  • discriderdiscrider Registered User regular
    edited January 22
    The other thing that I would find highly desirable is to also allow tags to be watched.

    So while I might have [MtG] ignored, others can have it watched and immediately receive notifications from New threads when those threads are created, rather than having to find the new thread themselves (or without having to search for the tag manually).
    Just to be triple sure I'm in every [Phalla]

    discrider on
  • ZibblsnrtZibblsnrt Registered User, Moderator mod
    discrider wrote: »
    Quetzi wrote: »
    discrider wrote: »
    I believe Delz is looking into the ability to ignore/hide specific threads on a case by case basis, which would eliminate the need for each thread topic to have an ultra specific tag

    Well, are threads getting recycled at 100 pages?

    Because if we are closing threads when they get too long (something that I also think is a good idea to help people jump into threads for the first time), then we're still exposing people to those threads unwillingly each time they're recreated.
    And that would be solved with specific ignorable tags following the thread each time it is renewed.

    How often does the MtG thread get recreated? Like, is the lift of having to tag a topic and manage topic tags worth it?

    It would depend on the topic and the activity in the thread.

    To pick a less me example, we're heading into a Trump presidency, and I can imagine some people wanting to disengage with news on awful-thing-Trump-did-today.
    I would expect such threads to maybe clock up 100 pages in a week during busy times.

    The big ridiculous movers in D&D this year were the election campaign threads, which usually took about a month to hit 100 pages.

    Anything faster than that tends to be big single-event threads that a lot of posters are heavily engaged in, like the thread for the election itself (which hit 100 pages in two days due to a lot of people liveposting their actions/reactions to the day along with the results) or other big events like the presidential debates, which are usually one-and-dones that get locked after a few days when they start drifting into being general discussion threads.

  • discriderdiscrider Registered User regular
    Yeah, a month was my original estimate, but I expect that to shrink to a week for the next four years.

  • ChrysisChrysis Registered User regular
    Are prefixes user definable and able to be used for filtering? If so keeping tags to a predefined list of more general subject\theme options and having a single OP definable prefix for the more specific content seems like it would be the way to go. That way admins aren't having to curate an ever growing list of ever more specific tags as new MMOs\TCGs\etc become popular, but users can still ignore them at will and threads don't turn into SEO like collections of user defined nonsense.

    Tri-Optimum reminds you that there are only one-hundred-sixty-three shopping days until Christmas. Just 1 extra work cycle twice a week will give you the spending money you need to make this holiday a very special one.
  • ZibblsnrtZibblsnrt Registered User, Moderator mod
    discrider wrote: »
    Yeah, a month was my original estimate, but I expect that to shrink to a week for the next four years.

    Looking back the January 2017 threads were ridiculous sub-week firehoses given the amount of incredulous live-reacting to everything going on with his cabinet and the like. After that - and again, aside from individual major events - things largely slowed down to about a month or two per thread per topic for the Russia investigations and other big ongoing events.

    Once the bulk of the cabinet and the initial EO firehose are out of the way I expect to see a similar pace going forward - people are a mix of jaded from his previous term, exhausted from the last few months, and frankly unsurprised about what the man's going to do this time around.

  • DelzhandDelzhand Coin Return Admin Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Tox wrote: »
    Could always just go with "That Asshole"

    No nicknames please

    US Executive is probably the way to go on this account anyway. US Congress and SCOTUS have their threads, may as well square the circle.

  • Hahnsoo1Hahnsoo1 Make Ready. We Hunt.Registered User, Moderator, Administrator admin
    ChicoBlue wrote: »
    Could you implement a

    [GOOD]

    thread tag so that I know which threads are good to read?

    Basically, only the "I am Bizzaro Stormy" threads?

    8i1dt37buh2m.png
    MHWilds ID: JF9LL8L3
  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    i think making a giant list of tags catered to the sum total of each user's individual preferences makes very little sense from a logistical standpoint when the simple solution is allowing users to ignore threads manually

    this gives the user full control of their own experience, avoids false positives, and doesn't require tags covering every conceivable gap

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • TofystedethTofystedeth Registered User regular
    Yeah. When tags can be created by anyone (or potentially must be if a proposed scenario is that threads must have at least one specific topic tag so users can globally ignore things like MtG or whatever) then what you end up with is a list of tags that is so full, and containing so many variants of the same thing, that it's functionally the same as not having tags.

    steam_sig.png
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    i think making a giant list of tags catered to the sum total of each user's individual preferences makes very little sense from a logistical standpoint when the simple solution is allowing users to ignore threads manually

    this gives the user full control of their own experience, avoids false positives, and doesn't require tags covering every conceivable gap

    Yeah I feel like the tags should be fun, like [Barbie] [Foosball] [Sausages]

    are YOU on the beer list?
  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    Tox wrote: »
    Could always just go with "That Asshole"

    No nicknames please

    We could just tag presidential. I feel like the odds of him living much past his term are slim, and we can revisit then.

  • tastydonutstastydonuts Registered User regular
    For "expectation", would it be possible to have a "low sodium" tag or something to that effect? The specific context I am asking about this for would be in respect to video games and other entertainment-type topics.

    While I don't think people shouldn't be allowed to spend all their days venting and ragging on how bad they feel a thing is or how awful its trajectory is going, etc, etc... it's kind of tedious having to read through it or try to steer a subject another way only to have it go back because somebody just got an engagement-bait push notification or w/e. On that note, and I don't know if it has been asked or where to ask, but for topics would it also be possible to have a topic exist in these two states? Like... the net result for me has been to simply participate and be around less. If such a thread is low engagement or it dies, it dies... but at least there would be another option. If there is a thread that I should put this latter comment into, lmk.

    “I used to draw, hard to admit that I used to draw...”
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • RatherDashingRatherDashing Registered User regular
    If I understand correctly, the jury is still out on whether we'll actually be recycling threads.

  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    i can't think of a good reason a thread needs to be longer than 100 pages

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    Chanus wrote: »
    i can't think of a good reason a thread needs to be longer than 100 pages

    My farming thread will go to 999

    are YOU on the beer list?
  • ChanusChanus Harbinger of the Spicy Rooster Apocalypse The Flames of a Thousand Collapsed StarsRegistered User, Moderator mod
    Chanus wrote: »
    i can't think of a good reason a thread needs to be longer than 100 pages

    My farming thread will go to 999

    monsantohour

    Allegedly a voice of reason.
  • DelzhandDelzhand Coin Return Admin Registered User, Transition Team regular
    If I understand correctly, the jury is still out on whether we'll actually be recycling threads.

    Not really. I don't expect thread length guidelines to change from what we have here. Long running threads should be refreshed voluntarily once they hit 100, fast moving threads can use a Gort command to lock and elect new thread creators

Sign In or Register to comment.