For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to
join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to
join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to
join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to
join us.
The Coin Return Forum Structure Poll - POLL CLOSED - Restructure Wins - Results on page 9
Posts
Like so many things that involve children you just have to not think about it and keep moving.
You had me convinced until the last bit. I think we might belong in the kid's play center considering how we get on sometimes.
Oh, there are other dangers that lurk in ballpits
NSFW
The second one with it colored is amazing for readability!
So this is what the C in CHAT stands for.
So it would be:
TITLE
ANOTHER TITLE
Description of what actually goes in there.
?
That's going to look pretty weird. If the idea is that the title has to be just a literal description of what goes in the subforum, then just have the titles be literal and don't bother with fun ones. I don't think we should "Ballistics: Ecks vs Sever" this.
Legos are cool, MOCs are cool, check me out on Rebrickable!
I don't think these look weird at all.
Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
Steam: Elvenshae // PSN: Elvenshae // WotC: Elvenshae
Wilds of Aladrion: [https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/comment/43159014/#Comment_43159014]Ellandryn[/url]
It's what ElJeffe described as something that would "look pretty weird."
Point being that no, it doesn't look weird. It looks fine, having a title for the subforum, then a clear statement of the intended content, followed by a more detailed description.
Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
DIGITAL GAMES
[Pixel Arcade] Console, PC etc
Maximum clarity at the expense of "whimsy" and "flavor".
Personally, I think the screenshots - especially with the color for emphasis - strike a good balance.
I thought we’d have to forego the flavour to get a better reorg but it’s not that hard to keep both and have it clear if you, you know, actually draw simpler categories than before.
Oh didn't know that - in that case I would advocate for another color, but I definitely think the tag should be colored so as to stand out from the descriptive text better.
What you posted looks good. I think because it doesn't scan to me as two titles, it scans as a title followed by descriptors.
If someone wants to call that two titles, fine by me!
Legos are cool, MOCs are cool, check me out on Rebrickable!
Daddy TWO titles.
MHWilds ID: JF9LL8L3
Would it change to unread if someone makes a new post in the sub-forum?
constantly changing the locations of subforums should be considered an act of war though
I should be writing these ideas down
I'd also consider a measure of average post quality, the Positive Reactions Per Post score
Evaluation of Post's Entertainment and Engagement Number.
It's better than not having it colored, but honestly I don't care for it? I'd prefer a different color for the tag from the name and the descriptive text.
So you're saying the bigger the Positive Engagement Number In Situ is, the higher it rises?
is this a farscape reference? in 2025? if so I love it
🖥️Steam Profile