Penny Arcade - Comic - Bot Without My Daughter

DogDog Registered User, Administrator, Vanilla Staff admin

Bot Without My Daughter!

Penny Arcade - Comic - Bot Without My Daughter

Videogaming-related online strip by Mike Krahulik and Jerry Holkins. Includes news and commentary.

Read the full story here

Posts

  • OverkillengineOverkillengine Registered User regular
    My assumption is their first name attempt was "AdolfClitler" but the filter caught it.

    And when the current name gets finally nuked they can work their way though various incarnations of "Diddys1000BabyOil".

  • Man in the MistsMan in the Mists Registered User regular
    The only way that player's name could've been worse is if they were playing Magneto.

  • HevachHevach Registered User regular
    Yeah but what if they harvest bot names from actual users?

    Worse what if they specifically harvest bot names from actual users who were recently in bot matches, so that if you do see the name again not only is it a real person, they're not good enough for it to be completely obvious which iteration is real and witch was a bot.

  • OverkillengineOverkillengine Registered User regular
    Hevach wrote: »
    Yeah but what if they harvest bot names from actual users?

    Worse what if they specifically harvest bot names from actual users who were recently in bot matches, so that if you do see the name again not only is it a real person, they're not good enough for it to be completely obvious which iteration is real and witch was a bot.

    There's an easy way to tell - are they spamming obscenities and slurs in general chat? Probably human unless bot makers start programming bots to do that too.

  • Moridin889Moridin889 Registered User regular
    Hevach wrote: »
    Yeah but what if they harvest bot names from actual users?

    Worse what if they specifically harvest bot names from actual users who were recently in bot matches, so that if you do see the name again not only is it a real person, they're not good enough for it to be completely obvious which iteration is real and witch was a bot.

    There's an easy way to tell - are they spamming obscenities and slurs in general chat? Probably human unless bot makers start programming bots to do that too.

    Good news! You don't have to program that way really. Just plop a LLM on the wider Internet and the training data takes care of it for you.

  • dennisdennis aka bingley Registered User regular
    The one stream I've actually watched of this featured an opponent named OzamaB1nLad1n.

  • GrendusGrendus Registered User regular
    Moridin889 wrote: »
    Hevach wrote: »
    Yeah but what if they harvest bot names from actual users?

    Worse what if they specifically harvest bot names from actual users who were recently in bot matches, so that if you do see the name again not only is it a real person, they're not good enough for it to be completely obvious which iteration is real and witch was a bot.

    There's an easy way to tell - are they spamming obscenities and slurs in general chat? Probably human unless bot makers start programming bots to do that too.

    Good news! You don't have to program that way really. Just plop a LLM on the wider Internet and the training data takes care of it for you.

    Nice to see Microsoft Tay still getting work.

  • OverkillengineOverkillengine Registered User regular
    Moridin889 wrote: »
    Hevach wrote: »
    Yeah but what if they harvest bot names from actual users?

    Worse what if they specifically harvest bot names from actual users who were recently in bot matches, so that if you do see the name again not only is it a real person, they're not good enough for it to be completely obvious which iteration is real and witch was a bot.

    There's an easy way to tell - are they spamming obscenities and slurs in general chat? Probably human unless bot makers start programming bots to do that too.

    Good news! You don't have to program that way really. Just plop a LLM on the wider Internet and the training data takes care of it for you.

    Oh sweet. Man-made horrors within comprehension!

  • HevachHevach Registered User regular
    Moridin889 wrote: »
    Hevach wrote: »
    Yeah but what if they harvest bot names from actual users?

    Worse what if they specifically harvest bot names from actual users who were recently in bot matches, so that if you do see the name again not only is it a real person, they're not good enough for it to be completely obvious which iteration is real and witch was a bot.

    There's an easy way to tell - are they spamming obscenities and slurs in general chat? Probably human unless bot makers start programming bots to do that too.

    Good news! You don't have to program that way really. Just plop a LLM on the wider Internet and the training data takes care of it for you.

    Oh sweet. Man-made horrors within comprehension!

    Our grandfathers made the nuclear bomb. We made a computer that tells you to eat rocks.

  • OverkillengineOverkillengine Registered User regular
    edited January 21
    Hevach wrote: »
    Moridin889 wrote: »
    Hevach wrote: »
    Yeah but what if they harvest bot names from actual users?

    Worse what if they specifically harvest bot names from actual users who were recently in bot matches, so that if you do see the name again not only is it a real person, they're not good enough for it to be completely obvious which iteration is real and witch was a bot.

    There's an easy way to tell - are they spamming obscenities and slurs in general chat? Probably human unless bot makers start programming bots to do that too.

    Good news! You don't have to program that way really. Just plop a LLM on the wider Internet and the training data takes care of it for you.

    Oh sweet. Man-made horrors within comprehension!

    Our grandfathers made the nuclear bomb. We made a computer that tells you to eat rocks.

    The part that still gets me is people are trusting a souped up predictive text algorithm to give accurate answers when its training data is a polluted cesspit called the internet.

    Really sends it home just how naive and lazy a large chunk of humanity is. May as well ask 4chan life planning advice.

    Overkillengine on
  • LttlefootLttlefoot Registered User regular
    But humans are trained on the same data

  • DelzhandDelzhand Agrias Fucking Oaks Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Lttlefoot wrote: »
    But humans are trained on the same data

    Over decades, with constant feedback, no resets, and (at least for most people) consequences

  • dennisdennis aka bingley Registered User regular
    Also, if there are humans in your life that are only trained on internet data, get them help.

  • OverkillengineOverkillengine Registered User regular
    edited January 22
    dennis wrote: »
    Also, if there are humans in your life that are only trained on internet data, get them help.

    But then they whine that you banned TikTok.

    Overkillengine on
  • TofystedethTofystedeth Registered User regular
    Delzhand wrote: »
    Lttlefoot wrote: »
    But humans are trained on the same data

    Over decades, with constant feedback, no resets, and (at least for most people) consequences

    Also humans use that training data to actually understand concepts and not just linkages between words

    steam_sig.png
Sign In or Register to comment.