Was gonna send this in a PM to Zonugal but their profile is set to private and I cannot add them as a PM recipient. Regarding this post made in this thread a couple weeks ago:
I imagine we are seeing pushback to "we'll have an avenue for complaints" when the entirety of the history of the PA forums was adversarial to that, full sale.
And I would hope folks on Coin Return trust the process enough to believe that a specific place for complains would be actually viable, but I'm not too surprised when we have had a couple years of a previous admin telling folks to message them (in which they just refused to engage) and decades of another previous admin projecting that any complaints issued would be received with vindication & malice.
Hey, I get it, I literally made several threads to yell at our previous admin because there was no suitable avenue! If we didn't have an avenue for public complaints, it'd be an issue for me!!
How do you reconcile asking people to trust the process when no such process was used with regards to the SE++ Palestine thread? You repeated the actions of the previous admin (the complaints about which you yourself made!) by making a unilateral decision with no warning and no "process" with which affected users could engage to reverse the outcome. What is the trust supposed to be built upon when given the same power you repeated the actions that you once decried?
I’m sure Zon has a response for you, and I’m not intending to speak for him, but as I was involved in this as well, I figure I can probably get most of the way to what I can imagine his answer would be and save everyone a little time.
The simple answer here is that at that time (which is several months ago at this point, mind you) there was no process. I think there were understandable reasons for what happened—which I’m not going to spend time relitigating now—but we probably agree that with the benefit of hindsight, the process of it could have been handled better. Of course, a lot of things that had gotten really bad over the last few years here could have been handled better. But I can at least admit where we made a misstep and commit to doing better going forward, and I’m confident Zon probably feels the same way. We’re imperfect, and went into an extremely difficult process with good intentions. We made some good decisions, and we made some mistakes — we’ll probably make more — but I don’t think you can accuse anyone on the TT of not learning important lessons along the way here.
To that end, if you’ve been paying attention at all, you’ll have seen that we’ve made every effort possible to make this whole thing a collaborative, equitable process for everyone to participate in and have their voice heard. We’ve committed to putting power over sweeping, community-impacting decisions into the hands of the community and their elected representatives, and we’ve gone so far as to not just promise that, but to write it into our bylaws at the foundation of this new company (still in process, of course, but chugging along).
Honestly, I don’t think Zon even needs to ask you to trust the process. 3 months ago? Sure. No one really knew for sure exactly how this ship was going to sail. But now? Most of the way there with the majority of the broad strokes already worked out? You can see the process happening in real time, and you can witness how much of it is being entrusted to this community. No faith is required for what you can see and touch yourself.
Hell, New Jersey, it said on the letter. Delivered without comment. So be it!
Consider also that the process that’s being proposed now has been (or is being) constructed informed by lessons learned from that Situation.
I was in vocal disagreement with the decision that was made around that thread. It’s all there for anyone who wants to look. And I was involved in writing the rules and the Values/CoC, and I definitely kept this and other similar past events in mind when trying to help reflect the new way we want to do things at CoRe… by learning from earlier missteps. That meant writing rules that either give recourse in the event of a future misstep of this type, or rules (in conjunction with the CoC and governance KDs) that block the issue from becoming an issue in the first place.
Consider also that the process that’s being proposed now has been or is being constructed at least in part based on lessons learned from that whole Situation.
I was in vocal disagreement with the decision that was made around that thread. It’s all there for anyone who wants to look. And I was involved in writing the rules and the Values/CoC, and I definitely kept this and other similar past events in mind when trying to help reflect the new way we want to do things at CoRe… by learning from earlier - if well-meaning - missteps. That meant writing rules that either give recourse in the event of a future misstep of this type, or rules (in conjunction with the CoC and governance KDs) that block the issue from becoming an issue in the first place.
We had, I think, an amazingly diverse set of views on all the major happenings on the forum for the rules subcommittee. I have seen similar in the governance stuff as well. I know it sucks to have some things happen behind the scenes. I just want to offer that people are advocating hard for the best solution we can come to with the widest range of people.
+1
QuetziHere we may reign secure, and in my choice,To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User, Moderatormod
edited March 6
And to address what's probably the least consequential part of that post, it is possible to PM people with private profiles.
Go to the New PM page (https://forums.penny-arcade.com/messages/add ) and type in the name of the person you want to send a message to--it should auto-complete in your options once you start typing.
And to address what's probably the least consequential part of that post, it is possible to PM people with private profiles.
Go to the New PM page (https://forums.penny-arcade.com/messages/add) and type in the name of the person you want to send a message to--it should auto-complete in your options once you start typing.
Huh. This didn't work for me yesterday for some reason. Working as expected now.
I made the bad assumption it was a vanilla problem rather than user error on my part. My apologies
I haven't tried recently on desktop, but I did try that the other day on mobile and it basically flipped me the bird, so ymmv.
First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
0
SolyspPreviously Kayne Red RobeRegistered Userregular
I think, at the risk of putting my foot in my mouth, there was no way to resolve the Palestine sticky thread to the satisfaction of all members of the forum and maybe we should extend a little grace to the folks who were trying to juggle many different competing dictates to do the least harm to all members where not everyone agreed as to what action or inaction would cause the most harm.
+5
ToxI kill threadsDilige, et quod vis facRegistered Userregular
edited March 6
I agree but fwiw the complaint felt more about the process used to make the decision.
It's fair to criticize that, but we should also recognize the TT owned that mistake and now we have not only that experience to draw on but also better guidance on how to handle things better next time.
Tox on
maybe the real panopticon was the friends we made along the way
Posts
I’m sure Zon has a response for you, and I’m not intending to speak for him, but as I was involved in this as well, I figure I can probably get most of the way to what I can imagine his answer would be and save everyone a little time.
The simple answer here is that at that time (which is several months ago at this point, mind you) there was no process. I think there were understandable reasons for what happened—which I’m not going to spend time relitigating now—but we probably agree that with the benefit of hindsight, the process of it could have been handled better. Of course, a lot of things that had gotten really bad over the last few years here could have been handled better. But I can at least admit where we made a misstep and commit to doing better going forward, and I’m confident Zon probably feels the same way. We’re imperfect, and went into an extremely difficult process with good intentions. We made some good decisions, and we made some mistakes — we’ll probably make more — but I don’t think you can accuse anyone on the TT of not learning important lessons along the way here.
To that end, if you’ve been paying attention at all, you’ll have seen that we’ve made every effort possible to make this whole thing a collaborative, equitable process for everyone to participate in and have their voice heard. We’ve committed to putting power over sweeping, community-impacting decisions into the hands of the community and their elected representatives, and we’ve gone so far as to not just promise that, but to write it into our bylaws at the foundation of this new company (still in process, of course, but chugging along).
Honestly, I don’t think Zon even needs to ask you to trust the process. 3 months ago? Sure. No one really knew for sure exactly how this ship was going to sail. But now? Most of the way there with the majority of the broad strokes already worked out? You can see the process happening in real time, and you can witness how much of it is being entrusted to this community. No faith is required for what you can see and touch yourself.
I was in vocal disagreement with the decision that was made around that thread. It’s all there for anyone who wants to look. And I was involved in writing the rules and the Values/CoC, and I definitely kept this and other similar past events in mind when trying to help reflect the new way we want to do things at CoRe… by learning from earlier missteps. That meant writing rules that either give recourse in the event of a future misstep of this type, or rules (in conjunction with the CoC and governance KDs) that block the issue from becoming an issue in the first place.
Edited for run-on sentences.
We had, I think, an amazingly diverse set of views on all the major happenings on the forum for the rules subcommittee. I have seen similar in the governance stuff as well. I know it sucks to have some things happen behind the scenes. I just want to offer that people are advocating hard for the best solution we can come to with the widest range of people.
Go to the New PM page (https://forums.penny-arcade.com/messages/add ) and type in the name of the person you want to send a message to--it should auto-complete in your options once you start typing.
Huh. This didn't work for me yesterday for some reason. Working as expected now.
I made the bad assumption it was a vanilla problem rather than user error on my part. My apologies
It's fair to criticize that, but we should also recognize the TT owned that mistake and now we have not only that experience to draw on but also better guidance on how to handle things better next time.