Having problems registering on Coin Return? Please email support@coin-return.org, and include your PA username and PIN.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to join us.
For those who don't know, forums.penny-arcade.com will be closing soon. However, we're doing the same kind of stuff over at coin-return.org with (almost) all the same faces! Please do feel welcome to join us.

Open Call for Board Member and Moderator Candidates [Until Friday, March 28th, 2025]

12021222325

Posts

  • HoukHouk Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Question I feel that needs to be asked at some point.

    Now that everything is open, and the people can decide, if he is elected to a position, will people respect the process, or resume raising 23 kinds of hell about how he's the devil incarnate and shouldn't be trusted to be dogcatcher?

    It feels like you're breezing past the assumption that he'd win here, unless you're implying that arguing or voting against him isn't respecting the process.

    I would direct you to the words in between the 2nd and 3rd commas in the bottom line.

    I would direct you to my response

  • zagdrobzagdrob Registered User regular
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    okay so we just put up a forum poll that says "First read this 24 page thread, then vote on if you think this was okay or not"

    For candidate Jeffe. The rest of the board candidates we find out and get to vote on in 12 hours.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Phyphor wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gereg wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Also, just so I'm clear with the sequence of events here - may I take this whole thing as an indication that mods and/or members of the TT were sharing my PMs with other people without my permission? I'm hoping that's not the case, because like, yikes?

    You don't like other people reading what you PM to others with an expectation of privacy?

    And yet you fail to see the problem with what you did?

    Yeah he read posts he had explicit permissions to read, given to him by the admins, until the admins decided he didn't have those perms anymore. Are you saying that "Using PA admin-given permissions with full knowledge of the PA admins" is disqualifying for a leadership role in CoRe because ho man.

    boy.

    golly.



    GEE.


    that describes a lot of people!

    People made reports with the expectation that Jeffe could not see them which he could. I would say that is definitely worse than someone sharing a PM he sent them yes. That the admins were ok with this situation does not make it ok. The users being entirely unaware is a problem.

    And that's ElJeffe's problem... how? Explain to me how admins not removing permissions, actively discussing things with him using those permissions, and then removing them later is ElJeffe committing some breach of judgement.

    Jeffe repeatedly represented himself as a regular user. This is not something I would say is worthy of punishment. Participating in it does make me question his judgment. He didn't create the situation, but he went along with it.

    It was revealed long ago that I had access to the mod forums. I never pretended otherwise, I didn't keep track of who knew what. I "presented" myself as an ex-moderator. This is what an ex-moderator was until two weeks ago, where now an ex-moderator is something different.

    I know people didn't like the fact that I had a mod badge. Or I guess a Retired Mod badge. I know people didn't like that I wasn't banned for the nefarious crime of being ElJeffe. I know that one person suggested that if I couldn't have my mod badge removed, I should have my account deleted and be forced to come back as an alt. People have all sorts of interesting opinions, and part of leadership is separating the reasonable ones from the unreasonable ones while still managing to provide a community for a disparate group of people to hang out.

    That first paragraph is factually untrue to my understanding, as several ex-mods neither had the badge nor access to the mod forums; do you dispute that?

    A small handful of moderators, at the time of their stepping down, have specifically requested to be de-modded for personal reasons. This was not the standard way of handling things - most ex-mods still had the same badges, same permissions, and everything else going forward. The only mods who were fully de-modded without specifically requesting it were those who had behavioral issues or who had lost the trust of the admins.

    I think my situation may have been a little murkier, as well, because I originally told Geebs that I was done modding because I couldn't handle the stress and negativity. He told me to follow my heart, but that he wasn't going to announce anything because he hoped I'd reconsider. I changed my mind later on, because I make poor life choices, and came back to modding. At a later date, I once again told Geebs I was quitting for reasons of stress. Same interaction happened, but this time I had the good sense to stop actively moderating.

    However, I still cared about the forums, and still wanted to help out in whatever way I could. This is my home, these are my peeps. After I left, there was basically half an active mod remaining. Geebs quickly added Hahn and Zibb, who came on and performed admirably. But they were new and had come from D&D chat, without having a huge amount of experience outside that area, and half of D&D was on fire at that point. I tried to provide context and historical knowledge to assist and occasionally act as Beef Whisperer. I will admit that while I'm far from the only retired mod to still chime in on matters, I was one of the more active ones, because I cared about this place and had difficulty completely noping out.

    Hopefully that clarifies things.

    https://youtu.be/ifaoKZfQpdA?si=ZMM-F5YD7b5KpEnh

    So lemme get this striggitty straight

    You took multiple mental health breaks from being a mod, but you're still seeking the same position again?

    And you were granted multiple such breaks and were repeatedly reinstated and also given special privileges While Also denying people self requested bans as it was "the policy" at the time but really the policies were whatever you and Kosh felt like doing that day or whatever

    A good place to start with all of this really, would be to do an apology tour. Say you're actually sorry, to the folks who you've actually hurt. Then maybe people would read your posts without a thick layer of smarm all over them

    No. He is in fact not seeking the same position

    Yeah, to be clear, I am specifically not signing up to be mod. That is a whole different kettle of sharks, and I think having sober discussions with a small group of peers would be a very different beast from actively moderating.

    Would you say I had a plethora of pinatas?

    Legos are cool, MOCs are cool, check me out on Rebrickable!
  • CelloCello Registered User regular
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Question I feel that needs to be asked at some point.

    Now that everything is open, and the people can decide, if he is elected to a position, will people respect the process, or resume raising 23 kinds of hell about how he's the devil incarnate and shouldn't be trusted to be dogcatcher?

    Honestly after this thread I'd really struggle with the decision to be active on the new forum, which is not something that has been in question until now

    I didn't have a strong take on Jeffe before this but it would significantly shake my confidence in moderator selection and overall caretaking of the forum

    Steam
    3DS Friend Code: 0216-0898-6512
    Switch Friend Code: SW-7437-1538-7786
  • HoukHouk Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Phyphor wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gereg wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Also, just so I'm clear with the sequence of events here - may I take this whole thing as an indication that mods and/or members of the TT were sharing my PMs with other people without my permission? I'm hoping that's not the case, because like, yikes?

    You don't like other people reading what you PM to others with an expectation of privacy?

    And yet you fail to see the problem with what you did?

    Yeah he read posts he had explicit permissions to read, given to him by the admins, until the admins decided he didn't have those perms anymore. Are you saying that "Using PA admin-given permissions with full knowledge of the PA admins" is disqualifying for a leadership role in CoRe because ho man.

    boy.

    golly.



    GEE.


    that describes a lot of people!

    People made reports with the expectation that Jeffe could not see them which he could. I would say that is definitely worse than someone sharing a PM he sent them yes. That the admins were ok with this situation does not make it ok. The users being entirely unaware is a problem.

    And that's ElJeffe's problem... how? Explain to me how admins not removing permissions, actively discussing things with him using those permissions, and then removing them later is ElJeffe committing some breach of judgement.

    Jeffe repeatedly represented himself as a regular user. This is not something I would say is worthy of punishment. Participating in it does make me question his judgment. He didn't create the situation, but he went along with it.

    It was revealed long ago that I had access to the mod forums. I never pretended otherwise, I didn't keep track of who knew what. I "presented" myself as an ex-moderator. This is what an ex-moderator was until two weeks ago, where now an ex-moderator is something different.

    I know people didn't like the fact that I had a mod badge. Or I guess a Retired Mod badge. I know people didn't like that I wasn't banned for the nefarious crime of being ElJeffe. I know that one person suggested that if I couldn't have my mod badge removed, I should have my account deleted and be forced to come back as an alt. People have all sorts of interesting opinions, and part of leadership is separating the reasonable ones from the unreasonable ones while still managing to provide a community for a disparate group of people to hang out.

    That first paragraph is factually untrue to my understanding, as several ex-mods neither had the badge nor access to the mod forums; do you dispute that?

    A small handful of moderators, at the time of their stepping down, have specifically requested to be de-modded for personal reasons. This was not the standard way of handling things - most ex-mods still had the same badges, same permissions, and everything else going forward. The only mods who were fully de-modded without specifically requesting it were those who had behavioral issues or who had lost the trust of the admins.

    I think my situation may have been a little murkier, as well, because I originally told Geebs that I was done modding because I couldn't handle the stress and negativity. He told me to follow my heart, but that he wasn't going to announce anything because he hoped I'd reconsider. I changed my mind later on, because I make poor life choices, and came back to modding. At a later date, I once again told Geebs I was quitting for reasons of stress. Same interaction happened, but this time I had the good sense to stop actively moderating.

    However, I still cared about the forums, and still wanted to help out in whatever way I could. This is my home, these are my peeps. After I left, there was basically half an active mod remaining. Geebs quickly added Hahn and Zibb, who came on and performed admirably. But they were new and had come from D&D chat, without having a huge amount of experience outside that area, and half of D&D was on fire at that point. I tried to provide context and historical knowledge to assist and occasionally act as Beef Whisperer. I will admit that while I'm far from the only retired mod to still chime in on matters, I was one of the more active ones, because I cared about this place and had difficulty completely noping out.

    Hopefully that clarifies things.

    https://youtu.be/ifaoKZfQpdA?si=ZMM-F5YD7b5KpEnh

    So lemme get this striggitty straight

    You took multiple mental health breaks from being a mod, but you're still seeking the same position again?

    And you were granted multiple such breaks and were repeatedly reinstated and also given special privileges While Also denying people self requested bans as it was "the policy" at the time but really the policies were whatever you and Kosh felt like doing that day or whatever

    A good place to start with all of this really, would be to do an apology tour. Say you're actually sorry, to the folks who you've actually hurt. Then maybe people would read your posts without a thick layer of smarm all over them

    No. He is in fact not seeking the same position

    Yeah, to be clear, I am specifically not signing up to be mod. That is a whole different kettle of sharks, and I think having sober discussions with a small group of peers would be a very different beast from actively moderating.

    so you're seeking a position with even more influence than a mod?

  • MechMantisMechMantis Registered User regular
    Milski wrote: »
    Frankly, I didn't actually care very much about ElJeffe having moderation access or an ex-mod badge, though I understand people who more frequently send reports or participate in threads with ElJeffe or who have more personal beef would feel otherwise. It generally felt like a pretty small fish to fry when there were a lot of other concerns with moderation standards and admin accessibility.

    But the fact we had all of those exhausting conversations and Jeffe was very publicly changed from a (historically) has-access role to a (historically) doesn't-have-access role, in the context of people saying they would feel far more comfortable on the forums if he didn't have access to the mod/report forums, and that wasn't actually a role change at all, just a visual change, feels a lot more fucked up! What was even the point of performing theatre like that?

    I definitely agree with this, what the precise decision tree that led to this... weird state with perms being retained but other indicators not is something I'd definitely want examined in more detail-- that shouldn't happen and I hope to fuck it doesn't happen in CoRe in whatever incarnation it takes and whether or not I take part in it. It's a pretty fucked state.

    I suppose our point of disagreement is where the onus on fixing that lies.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • HoukHouk Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    god the people defending jeffe are so much more sympathetic and relatable than jeffe himself

    let your surrogates help you out, dude

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • localhjaylocalhjay Registered User regular
    Phyphor wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gereg wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Also, just so I'm clear with the sequence of events here - may I take this whole thing as an indication that mods and/or members of the TT were sharing my PMs with other people without my permission? I'm hoping that's not the case, because like, yikes?

    You don't like other people reading what you PM to others with an expectation of privacy?

    And yet you fail to see the problem with what you did?

    Yeah he read posts he had explicit permissions to read, given to him by the admins, until the admins decided he didn't have those perms anymore. Are you saying that "Using PA admin-given permissions with full knowledge of the PA admins" is disqualifying for a leadership role in CoRe because ho man.

    boy.

    golly.



    GEE.


    that describes a lot of people!

    People made reports with the expectation that Jeffe could not see them which he could. I would say that is definitely worse than someone sharing a PM he sent them yes. That the admins were ok with this situation does not make it ok. The users being entirely unaware is a problem.

    And that's ElJeffe's problem... how? Explain to me how admins not removing permissions, actively discussing things with him using those permissions, and then removing them later is ElJeffe committing some breach of judgement.

    Jeffe repeatedly represented himself as a regular user. This is not something I would say is worthy of punishment. Participating in it does make me question his judgment. He didn't create the situation, but he went along with it.

    It was revealed long ago that I had access to the mod forums. I never pretended otherwise, I didn't keep track of who knew what. I "presented" myself as an ex-moderator. This is what an ex-moderator was until two weeks ago, where now an ex-moderator is something different.

    I know people didn't like the fact that I had a mod badge. Or I guess a Retired Mod badge. I know people didn't like that I wasn't banned for the nefarious crime of being ElJeffe. I know that one person suggested that if I couldn't have my mod badge removed, I should have my account deleted and be forced to come back as an alt. People have all sorts of interesting opinions, and part of leadership is separating the reasonable ones from the unreasonable ones while still managing to provide a community for a disparate group of people to hang out.

    That first paragraph is factually untrue to my understanding, as several ex-mods neither had the badge nor access to the mod forums; do you dispute that?

    A small handful of moderators, at the time of their stepping down, have specifically requested to be de-modded for personal reasons. This was not the standard way of handling things - most ex-mods still had the same badges, same permissions, and everything else going forward. The only mods who were fully de-modded without specifically requesting it were those who had behavioral issues or who had lost the trust of the admins.

    I think my situation may have been a little murkier, as well, because I originally told Geebs that I was done modding because I couldn't handle the stress and negativity. He told me to follow my heart, but that he wasn't going to announce anything because he hoped I'd reconsider. I changed my mind later on, because I make poor life choices, and came back to modding. At a later date, I once again told Geebs I was quitting for reasons of stress. Same interaction happened, but this time I had the good sense to stop actively moderating.

    However, I still cared about the forums, and still wanted to help out in whatever way I could. This is my home, these are my peeps. After I left, there was basically half an active mod remaining. Geebs quickly added Hahn and Zibb, who came on and performed admirably. But they were new and had come from D&D chat, without having a huge amount of experience outside that area, and half of D&D was on fire at that point. I tried to provide context and historical knowledge to assist and occasionally act as Beef Whisperer. I will admit that while I'm far from the only retired mod to still chime in on matters, I was one of the more active ones, because I cared about this place and had difficulty completely noping out.

    Hopefully that clarifies things.

    https://youtu.be/ifaoKZfQpdA?si=ZMM-F5YD7b5KpEnh

    So lemme get this striggitty straight

    You took multiple mental health breaks from being a mod, but you're still seeking the same position again?

    And you were granted multiple such breaks and were repeatedly reinstated and also given special privileges While Also denying people self requested bans as it was "the policy" at the time but really the policies were whatever you and Kosh felt like doing that day or whatever

    A good place to start with all of this really, would be to do an apology tour. Say you're actually sorry, to the folks who you've actually hurt. Then maybe people would read your posts without a thick layer of smarm all over them

    No. He is in fact not seeking the same position

    Sorry, that's embarrassing. I went and looked. A board position seems to be about the same level of responsibility, if not maybe even more than, a mod. Suffice to say, I wouldn't vote for someone who's needed multiple mental health breaks from their forum position already, mostly because if that's true I think they are setting themselves up to be once again stressed and need to step down, which means they'd have to be replaced in the interim. And maybe they have an expectation they would be reinstated like the old days? Idk I'm not them

    But to say the least, your response doesn't materially address that Jeffe has been afforded special treatment while also denying others similar such kindnesses

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • QuetziQuetzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User, Moderator mod
    edited March 31
    localhjay wrote: »
    Phyphor wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gereg wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Also, just so I'm clear with the sequence of events here - may I take this whole thing as an indication that mods and/or members of the TT were sharing my PMs with other people without my permission? I'm hoping that's not the case, because like, yikes?

    You don't like other people reading what you PM to others with an expectation of privacy?

    And yet you fail to see the problem with what you did?

    Yeah he read posts he had explicit permissions to read, given to him by the admins, until the admins decided he didn't have those perms anymore. Are you saying that "Using PA admin-given permissions with full knowledge of the PA admins" is disqualifying for a leadership role in CoRe because ho man.

    boy.

    golly.



    GEE.


    that describes a lot of people!

    People made reports with the expectation that Jeffe could not see them which he could. I would say that is definitely worse than someone sharing a PM he sent them yes. That the admins were ok with this situation does not make it ok. The users being entirely unaware is a problem.

    And that's ElJeffe's problem... how? Explain to me how admins not removing permissions, actively discussing things with him using those permissions, and then removing them later is ElJeffe committing some breach of judgement.

    Jeffe repeatedly represented himself as a regular user. This is not something I would say is worthy of punishment. Participating in it does make me question his judgment. He didn't create the situation, but he went along with it.

    It was revealed long ago that I had access to the mod forums. I never pretended otherwise, I didn't keep track of who knew what. I "presented" myself as an ex-moderator. This is what an ex-moderator was until two weeks ago, where now an ex-moderator is something different.

    I know people didn't like the fact that I had a mod badge. Or I guess a Retired Mod badge. I know people didn't like that I wasn't banned for the nefarious crime of being ElJeffe. I know that one person suggested that if I couldn't have my mod badge removed, I should have my account deleted and be forced to come back as an alt. People have all sorts of interesting opinions, and part of leadership is separating the reasonable ones from the unreasonable ones while still managing to provide a community for a disparate group of people to hang out.

    That first paragraph is factually untrue to my understanding, as several ex-mods neither had the badge nor access to the mod forums; do you dispute that?

    A small handful of moderators, at the time of their stepping down, have specifically requested to be de-modded for personal reasons. This was not the standard way of handling things - most ex-mods still had the same badges, same permissions, and everything else going forward. The only mods who were fully de-modded without specifically requesting it were those who had behavioral issues or who had lost the trust of the admins.

    I think my situation may have been a little murkier, as well, because I originally told Geebs that I was done modding because I couldn't handle the stress and negativity. He told me to follow my heart, but that he wasn't going to announce anything because he hoped I'd reconsider. I changed my mind later on, because I make poor life choices, and came back to modding. At a later date, I once again told Geebs I was quitting for reasons of stress. Same interaction happened, but this time I had the good sense to stop actively moderating.

    However, I still cared about the forums, and still wanted to help out in whatever way I could. This is my home, these are my peeps. After I left, there was basically half an active mod remaining. Geebs quickly added Hahn and Zibb, who came on and performed admirably. But they were new and had come from D&D chat, without having a huge amount of experience outside that area, and half of D&D was on fire at that point. I tried to provide context and historical knowledge to assist and occasionally act as Beef Whisperer. I will admit that while I'm far from the only retired mod to still chime in on matters, I was one of the more active ones, because I cared about this place and had difficulty completely noping out.

    Hopefully that clarifies things.

    https://youtu.be/ifaoKZfQpdA?si=ZMM-F5YD7b5KpEnh

    So lemme get this striggitty straight

    You took multiple mental health breaks from being a mod, but you're still seeking the same position again?

    And you were granted multiple such breaks and were repeatedly reinstated and also given special privileges While Also denying people self requested bans as it was "the policy" at the time but really the policies were whatever you and Kosh felt like doing that day or whatever

    A good place to start with all of this really, would be to do an apology tour. Say you're actually sorry, to the folks who you've actually hurt. Then maybe people would read your posts without a thick layer of smarm all over them

    No. He is in fact not seeking the same position

    Sorry, that's embarrassing. I went and looked. A board position seems to be about the same level of responsibility, if not maybe even more than, a mod. Suffice to say, I wouldn't vote for someone who's needed multiple mental health breaks from their forum position already, mostly because if that's true I think they are setting themselves up to be once again stressed and need to step down, which means they'd have to be replaced in the interim. And maybe they have an expectation they would be reinstated like the old days? Idk I'm not them

    But to say the least, your response doesn't materially address that Jeffe has been afforded special treatment while also denying others similar such kindnesses

    Regardless of everything else, I think it is pretty unfair to hold someone needing a mental health break from a previous position against them, honestly.

    Quetzi on
  • Space PickleSpace Pickle Registered User regular
    To be perfectly frank I think the ElJeffe discussion has run its course and has thoroughly sucked up all the oxygen out of the room in particularly explosive fashion.

    We are talking about one candidate among what I assume will be dozens of viable choices, for multiple seats. Even in the exceedingly rare case that ElJeffe wins election, he will be one among many. In addition, the chance to speak for or against particular candidates will be had during the actual election.

    I'm honestly not sure if anything productive is to be had by allowing folks to water torture this issue further. ElJeffe clearly made his choice. Others - likely the ones who would've brought up the issue in the first place - have responded accordingly. Their respective positions are clear to everyone, and if necessary can be brought up again during the actual election.

    This entire thing could've been sectioned off during the election as a specific issue with a specific candidate (likely with its own thread), and instead has become an insane clown fiesta lightning rod that has caused at least one contributing member to self-immolate.

    Insane Clown Fiesta is the name of my Insane Clown Posse tribute band

  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    Quetzi wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    Phyphor wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gereg wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Also, just so I'm clear with the sequence of events here - may I take this whole thing as an indication that mods and/or members of the TT were sharing my PMs with other people without my permission? I'm hoping that's not the case, because like, yikes?

    You don't like other people reading what you PM to others with an expectation of privacy?

    And yet you fail to see the problem with what you did?

    Yeah he read posts he had explicit permissions to read, given to him by the admins, until the admins decided he didn't have those perms anymore. Are you saying that "Using PA admin-given permissions with full knowledge of the PA admins" is disqualifying for a leadership role in CoRe because ho man.

    boy.

    golly.



    GEE.


    that describes a lot of people!

    People made reports with the expectation that Jeffe could not see them which he could. I would say that is definitely worse than someone sharing a PM he sent them yes. That the admins were ok with this situation does not make it ok. The users being entirely unaware is a problem.

    And that's ElJeffe's problem... how? Explain to me how admins not removing permissions, actively discussing things with him using those permissions, and then removing them later is ElJeffe committing some breach of judgement.

    Jeffe repeatedly represented himself as a regular user. This is not something I would say is worthy of punishment. Participating in it does make me question his judgment. He didn't create the situation, but he went along with it.

    It was revealed long ago that I had access to the mod forums. I never pretended otherwise, I didn't keep track of who knew what. I "presented" myself as an ex-moderator. This is what an ex-moderator was until two weeks ago, where now an ex-moderator is something different.

    I know people didn't like the fact that I had a mod badge. Or I guess a Retired Mod badge. I know people didn't like that I wasn't banned for the nefarious crime of being ElJeffe. I know that one person suggested that if I couldn't have my mod badge removed, I should have my account deleted and be forced to come back as an alt. People have all sorts of interesting opinions, and part of leadership is separating the reasonable ones from the unreasonable ones while still managing to provide a community for a disparate group of people to hang out.

    That first paragraph is factually untrue to my understanding, as several ex-mods neither had the badge nor access to the mod forums; do you dispute that?

    A small handful of moderators, at the time of their stepping down, have specifically requested to be de-modded for personal reasons. This was not the standard way of handling things - most ex-mods still had the same badges, same permissions, and everything else going forward. The only mods who were fully de-modded without specifically requesting it were those who had behavioral issues or who had lost the trust of the admins.

    I think my situation may have been a little murkier, as well, because I originally told Geebs that I was done modding because I couldn't handle the stress and negativity. He told me to follow my heart, but that he wasn't going to announce anything because he hoped I'd reconsider. I changed my mind later on, because I make poor life choices, and came back to modding. At a later date, I once again told Geebs I was quitting for reasons of stress. Same interaction happened, but this time I had the good sense to stop actively moderating.

    However, I still cared about the forums, and still wanted to help out in whatever way I could. This is my home, these are my peeps. After I left, there was basically half an active mod remaining. Geebs quickly added Hahn and Zibb, who came on and performed admirably. But they were new and had come from D&D chat, without having a huge amount of experience outside that area, and half of D&D was on fire at that point. I tried to provide context and historical knowledge to assist and occasionally act as Beef Whisperer. I will admit that while I'm far from the only retired mod to still chime in on matters, I was one of the more active ones, because I cared about this place and had difficulty completely noping out.

    Hopefully that clarifies things.

    https://youtu.be/ifaoKZfQpdA?si=ZMM-F5YD7b5KpEnh

    So lemme get this striggitty straight

    You took multiple mental health breaks from being a mod, but you're still seeking the same position again?

    And you were granted multiple such breaks and were repeatedly reinstated and also given special privileges While Also denying people self requested bans as it was "the policy" at the time but really the policies were whatever you and Kosh felt like doing that day or whatever

    A good place to start with all of this really, would be to do an apology tour. Say you're actually sorry, to the folks who you've actually hurt. Then maybe people would read your posts without a thick layer of smarm all over them

    No. He is in fact not seeking the same position

    Sorry, that's embarrassing. I went and looked. A board position seems to be about the same level of responsibility, if not maybe even more than, a mod. Suffice to say, I wouldn't vote for someone who's needed multiple mental health breaks from their forum position already, mostly because if that's true I think they are setting themselves up to be once again stressed and need to step down, which means they'd have to be replaced in the interim. And maybe they have an expectation they would be reinstated like the old days? Idk I'm not them

    But to say the least, your response doesn't materially address that Jeffe has been afforded special treatment while also denying others similar such kindnesses

    Regardless of everything else, I think it is pretty unfair to hold someone needing a mental health break from a previous position against them, honestly.

    Especially moderation. Dealing with people is exhausting

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • localhjaylocalhjay Registered User regular
    Quetzi wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    Phyphor wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gereg wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Also, just so I'm clear with the sequence of events here - may I take this whole thing as an indication that mods and/or members of the TT were sharing my PMs with other people without my permission? I'm hoping that's not the case, because like, yikes?

    You don't like other people reading what you PM to others with an expectation of privacy?

    And yet you fail to see the problem with what you did?

    Yeah he read posts he had explicit permissions to read, given to him by the admins, until the admins decided he didn't have those perms anymore. Are you saying that "Using PA admin-given permissions with full knowledge of the PA admins" is disqualifying for a leadership role in CoRe because ho man.

    boy.

    golly.



    GEE.


    that describes a lot of people!

    People made reports with the expectation that Jeffe could not see them which he could. I would say that is definitely worse than someone sharing a PM he sent them yes. That the admins were ok with this situation does not make it ok. The users being entirely unaware is a problem.

    And that's ElJeffe's problem... how? Explain to me how admins not removing permissions, actively discussing things with him using those permissions, and then removing them later is ElJeffe committing some breach of judgement.

    Jeffe repeatedly represented himself as a regular user. This is not something I would say is worthy of punishment. Participating in it does make me question his judgment. He didn't create the situation, but he went along with it.

    It was revealed long ago that I had access to the mod forums. I never pretended otherwise, I didn't keep track of who knew what. I "presented" myself as an ex-moderator. This is what an ex-moderator was until two weeks ago, where now an ex-moderator is something different.

    I know people didn't like the fact that I had a mod badge. Or I guess a Retired Mod badge. I know people didn't like that I wasn't banned for the nefarious crime of being ElJeffe. I know that one person suggested that if I couldn't have my mod badge removed, I should have my account deleted and be forced to come back as an alt. People have all sorts of interesting opinions, and part of leadership is separating the reasonable ones from the unreasonable ones while still managing to provide a community for a disparate group of people to hang out.

    That first paragraph is factually untrue to my understanding, as several ex-mods neither had the badge nor access to the mod forums; do you dispute that?

    A small handful of moderators, at the time of their stepping down, have specifically requested to be de-modded for personal reasons. This was not the standard way of handling things - most ex-mods still had the same badges, same permissions, and everything else going forward. The only mods who were fully de-modded without specifically requesting it were those who had behavioral issues or who had lost the trust of the admins.

    I think my situation may have been a little murkier, as well, because I originally told Geebs that I was done modding because I couldn't handle the stress and negativity. He told me to follow my heart, but that he wasn't going to announce anything because he hoped I'd reconsider. I changed my mind later on, because I make poor life choices, and came back to modding. At a later date, I once again told Geebs I was quitting for reasons of stress. Same interaction happened, but this time I had the good sense to stop actively moderating.

    However, I still cared about the forums, and still wanted to help out in whatever way I could. This is my home, these are my peeps. After I left, there was basically half an active mod remaining. Geebs quickly added Hahn and Zibb, who came on and performed admirably. But they were new and had come from D&D chat, without having a huge amount of experience outside that area, and half of D&D was on fire at that point. I tried to provide context and historical knowledge to assist and occasionally act as Beef Whisperer. I will admit that while I'm far from the only retired mod to still chime in on matters, I was one of the more active ones, because I cared about this place and had difficulty completely noping out.

    Hopefully that clarifies things.

    https://youtu.be/ifaoKZfQpdA?si=ZMM-F5YD7b5KpEnh

    So lemme get this striggitty straight

    You took multiple mental health breaks from being a mod, but you're still seeking the same position again?

    And you were granted multiple such breaks and were repeatedly reinstated and also given special privileges While Also denying people self requested bans as it was "the policy" at the time but really the policies were whatever you and Kosh felt like doing that day or whatever

    A good place to start with all of this really, would be to do an apology tour. Say you're actually sorry, to the folks who you've actually hurt. Then maybe people would read your posts without a thick layer of smarm all over them

    No. He is in fact not seeking the same position

    Sorry, that's embarrassing. I went and looked. A board position seems to be about the same level of responsibility, if not maybe even more than, a mod. Suffice to say, I wouldn't vote for someone who's needed multiple mental health breaks from their forum position already, mostly because if that's true I think they are setting themselves up to be once again stressed and need to step down, which means they'd have to be replaced in the interim. And maybe they have an expectation they would be reinstated like the old days? Idk I'm not them

    But to say the least, your response doesn't materially address that Jeffe has been afforded special treatment while also denying others similar such kindnesses

    Regardless of everything else, I think it is pretty unfair to hold someone needing a mental health break from a previous position against them, honestly.

    It's a forum volunteer position. There's nothing wrong with needing a break, but me hearing "this dude has been consistently stressed out by forum duties" and then me saying well whatever and voting for them anyways is like almost enabling self harm. I've had to step away from the forums multiple times now for similar reasons, and I wouldn't nominate myself for any leadership position because I simply know that when I inevitably need a break, I'll be not just inconveniencing other board members or whoever, but I'll also feel bad knowing I let down all the people who voted for me knowing I simply can't do what they all said they believed I could do

    Sorry that's weirdly meta because in these situations easier to relate it to myself, the major difference being I both have no desire for any such role and also, I know I would be quite bad at it

    I think more people if they reflected on themselves and their actions might come to the same conclusions

  • ToxTox I kill threads Dilige, et quod vis facRegistered User regular
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Question I feel that needs to be asked at some point.

    Now that everything is open, and the people can decide, if he is elected to a position, will people respect the process, or resume raising 23 kinds of hell about how he's the devil incarnate and shouldn't be trusted to be dogcatcher?

    Now that I know he won't keep his nose out of stuff it doesn't need to be in, I would have very strong reservations about maintaining my account on CoRe.

    This thread has unfortunately given me a list of such names.

    maybe the real panopticon was the friends we made along the way
  • AmberAmber Registered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Magell wrote: »
    PantsB wrote: »
    Honestly this should be a masks off moment. Jeffe has been entirely civil as he's repeatedly attacked even as receipts and recollections require an ever shrinking accusation. Meanwhile the guy brought in to play a substantial role showed his entire ass, as anyone who knew him before could have told you would happen. It's bad judgement.

    Has he? You can either complain sharing his PMs without permission is wrong, but this whole thing started when he shared a PM without permission.

    The fact that the entire TT signed onto it sealed the deal in my mind - this wasn't just one guy talking to me, this was a concerted effort at coercion by the entire TT using the forum version of official channels.

    It is remarkable to paint yourself as the victim of a massive conspiracy to inflict coercion.

    The so-called penalty here is that, in the run up to an election for a position of public authority and trust, your own recent breach of trust has been explained to the voters.

    Anyone with an ounce of shame would have simply withdrawn.

  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    Frankly, I didn't actually care very much about ElJeffe having moderation access or an ex-mod badge, though I understand people who more frequently send reports or participate in threads with ElJeffe or who have more personal beef would feel otherwise. It generally felt like a pretty small fish to fry when there were a lot of other concerns with moderation standards and admin accessibility.

    But the fact we had all of those exhausting conversations and Jeffe was very publicly changed from a (historically) has-access role to a (historically) doesn't-have-access role, in the context of people saying they would feel far more comfortable on the forums if he didn't have access to the mod/report forums, and that wasn't actually a role change at all, just a visual change, feels a lot more fucked up! What was even the point of performing theatre like that?

    I definitely agree with this, what the precise decision tree that led to this... weird state with perms being retained but other indicators not is something I'd definitely want examined in more detail-- that shouldn't happen and I hope to fuck it doesn't happen in CoRe in whatever incarnation it takes and whether or not I take part in it. It's a pretty fucked state.

    I suppose our point of disagreement is where the onus on fixing that lies.

    my basic assumption is that vanilla role permissions were set up by a sphinx. I completely believe that the retired mod role was removed and everyone just expected that included the mod forum permissions. Obviously none of that comes down on eljeffe. the problem part is what happens after discovering you still have those permissions. There should be some expectation from at minimum not using them up to telling someone with the power to fix it. Like it's kind of scouts honor at that point, but I have some issue with not immediately resolving what was essentially just a forum bug at that point, Of course any use of those permissions after the point they were supposed to be removed is different.

    So to be clear the retired mod badge is very deceptive. It is not a different role. It was just the word retired super imposed over the mod thing. After some of the other retired mods lost their badge you could still see where it said retired on top. Maybe you still can? I haven't checked. I looked cause I thought it would after learning the truth and was right.

    Jeffe's access was also not an oversight. He was deliberately given permissions so he could still access the report forum and social forum for mods. Having the regular user badge with that access was an intentional choice made for reasons I won't share cause they don't really impact the discussion here I think. If the person who made the call ends up running for anything that could change, but to the best of my knowledge that isn't the case. I dunno much about who is running for what other than what has been stated publicly though.

    Re bolded : please learn from what happened today and don't use that information to bludgeon people not to run again.

  • KelorKelor Registered User regular
    PantsB wrote: »
    Honestly this should be a masks off moment. Jeffe has been entirely civil as he's repeatedly attacked even as receipts and recollections require an ever shrinking accusation. Meanwhile the guy brought in to play a substantial role showed his entire ass, as anyone who knew him before could have told you would happen. It's bad judgement.

    jeffe was civil AND wrong. and the people trying to fix the situation were baited relentlessly until one of them decided to quit building an entire god damn forum by self immolating. acting like that's a meaningful reflection on anything that happened is absurd. this isn't a debate club were jeffe gets points for poise.

    Being civil but wrong is a hallmark of some echelons of the forum.

    This thread is an excellent use case of people baiting reactions that we are supposed to be look upon more harshly.


    None of that happening lessens Jeffe's breach of conduct, and to be frank, the administration's allowing of it. The choice to revert Jeffe to a regular user with access to the moderator forums was an active choice to have been made, in direct contravention to how it was publicly being presented. We know this because he has now been stripped of that privilege. The constant caginess at every turn has been tiring, particularly when reservations continue to be proved justified.


    It was made clear, in words he himself used that I quoted earlier that he had no interest in being involved with moderation. This was on the tail end of a long history of problematic modding where he at times leapt into other parts of the forum outside of his own purview to infract people along with creating a toxic culture of bullying, piling on and to be charitable, dismissal of concerns of minority forumers.

    People's reticience about him having a mod badge after he was no longer a mod was informed by this. We were told don't worry, he isn't a mod any longer but we can't unmod him or the shaky pillars holding up the forums will collapse. The mod forums are simply being used as a social space

    Then it turned out, no, actually, not a problem demodding people. He has a special retired badge now.

    Then eventually he was demodded, was just a regular user. Has a regular user profile.

    Except we have come to learn that he's not just just doing that, he's interceding, litigating and cajoling mods on disciplinary and moderation actions. This continued duplicitousness is why I'm still surprised that the option to keep Jeffe's actions on the downlow was even entertained.



    To be frank, for many of you I don't believe there is any level of evidence you would accept and it is not lost on me that you in the past have shown that you will not believe your own lying eyes at times when your ego or interests lie in the other direction.

  • MilskiMilski Poyo! Registered User regular
    edited March 31
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    Frankly, I didn't actually care very much about ElJeffe having moderation access or an ex-mod badge, though I understand people who more frequently send reports or participate in threads with ElJeffe or who have more personal beef would feel otherwise. It generally felt like a pretty small fish to fry when there were a lot of other concerns with moderation standards and admin accessibility.

    But the fact we had all of those exhausting conversations and Jeffe was very publicly changed from a (historically) has-access role to a (historically) doesn't-have-access role, in the context of people saying they would feel far more comfortable on the forums if he didn't have access to the mod/report forums, and that wasn't actually a role change at all, just a visual change, feels a lot more fucked up! What was even the point of performing theatre like that?

    I definitely agree with this, what the precise decision tree that led to this... weird state with perms being retained but other indicators not is something I'd definitely want examined in more detail-- that shouldn't happen and I hope to fuck it doesn't happen in CoRe in whatever incarnation it takes and whether or not I take part in it. It's a pretty fucked state.

    I suppose our point of disagreement is where the onus on fixing that lies.

    my basic assumption is that vanilla role permissions were set up by a sphinx. I completely believe that the retired mod role was removed and everyone just expected that included the mod forum permissions. Obviously none of that comes down on eljeffe. the problem part is what happens after discovering you still have those permissions. There should be some expectation from at minimum not using them up to telling someone with the power to fix it. Like it's kind of scouts honor at that point, but I have some issue with not immediately resolving what was essentially just a forum bug at that point, Of course any use of those permissions after the point they were supposed to be removed is different.

    So to be clear the retired mod badge is very deceptive. It is not a different role. It was just the word retired super imposed over the mod thing. After some of the other retired mods lost their badge you could still see where it said retired on top. Maybe you still can? I haven't checked. I looked cause I thought it would after learning the truth and was right.

    Jeffe's access was also not an oversight. He was deliberately given permissions so he could still access the report forum and social forum for mods. Having the regular user badge with that access was an intentional choice made for reasons I won't share cause they don't really impact the discussion here I think. If the person who made the call ends up running for anything that could change, but to the best of my knowledge that isn't the case. I dunno much about who is running for what other than what has been stated publicly though.

    Re bolded : please learn from what happened today and don't use that information to bludgeon people not to run again.

    I only agree with this in the sense that whoever decided Jeffe should be a secret mod should probably be made public now to save us all the time and to be transparent since it seems exceedingly clear that information will come out.

    Milski on
    I ate an engineer
  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    zagdrob wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    okay so we just put up a forum poll that says "First read this 24 page thread, then vote on if you think this was okay or not"

    For candidate Jeffe. The rest of the board candidates we find out and get to vote on in 12 hours.

    I’m sure absolutely none of them have ever said or done anything that might be considered objectionable at some point…

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • Styrofoam SammichStyrofoam Sammich WANT. normal (not weird)Registered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Phyphor wrote: »
    localhjay wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Milski wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    MechMantis wrote: »
    Gereg wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Also, just so I'm clear with the sequence of events here - may I take this whole thing as an indication that mods and/or members of the TT were sharing my PMs with other people without my permission? I'm hoping that's not the case, because like, yikes?

    You don't like other people reading what you PM to others with an expectation of privacy?

    And yet you fail to see the problem with what you did?

    Yeah he read posts he had explicit permissions to read, given to him by the admins, until the admins decided he didn't have those perms anymore. Are you saying that "Using PA admin-given permissions with full knowledge of the PA admins" is disqualifying for a leadership role in CoRe because ho man.

    boy.

    golly.



    GEE.


    that describes a lot of people!

    People made reports with the expectation that Jeffe could not see them which he could. I would say that is definitely worse than someone sharing a PM he sent them yes. That the admins were ok with this situation does not make it ok. The users being entirely unaware is a problem.

    And that's ElJeffe's problem... how? Explain to me how admins not removing permissions, actively discussing things with him using those permissions, and then removing them later is ElJeffe committing some breach of judgement.

    Jeffe repeatedly represented himself as a regular user. This is not something I would say is worthy of punishment. Participating in it does make me question his judgment. He didn't create the situation, but he went along with it.

    It was revealed long ago that I had access to the mod forums. I never pretended otherwise, I didn't keep track of who knew what. I "presented" myself as an ex-moderator. This is what an ex-moderator was until two weeks ago, where now an ex-moderator is something different.

    I know people didn't like the fact that I had a mod badge. Or I guess a Retired Mod badge. I know people didn't like that I wasn't banned for the nefarious crime of being ElJeffe. I know that one person suggested that if I couldn't have my mod badge removed, I should have my account deleted and be forced to come back as an alt. People have all sorts of interesting opinions, and part of leadership is separating the reasonable ones from the unreasonable ones while still managing to provide a community for a disparate group of people to hang out.

    That first paragraph is factually untrue to my understanding, as several ex-mods neither had the badge nor access to the mod forums; do you dispute that?

    A small handful of moderators, at the time of their stepping down, have specifically requested to be de-modded for personal reasons. This was not the standard way of handling things - most ex-mods still had the same badges, same permissions, and everything else going forward. The only mods who were fully de-modded without specifically requesting it were those who had behavioral issues or who had lost the trust of the admins.

    I think my situation may have been a little murkier, as well, because I originally told Geebs that I was done modding because I couldn't handle the stress and negativity. He told me to follow my heart, but that he wasn't going to announce anything because he hoped I'd reconsider. I changed my mind later on, because I make poor life choices, and came back to modding. At a later date, I once again told Geebs I was quitting for reasons of stress. Same interaction happened, but this time I had the good sense to stop actively moderating.

    However, I still cared about the forums, and still wanted to help out in whatever way I could. This is my home, these are my peeps. After I left, there was basically half an active mod remaining. Geebs quickly added Hahn and Zibb, who came on and performed admirably. But they were new and had come from D&D chat, without having a huge amount of experience outside that area, and half of D&D was on fire at that point. I tried to provide context and historical knowledge to assist and occasionally act as Beef Whisperer. I will admit that while I'm far from the only retired mod to still chime in on matters, I was one of the more active ones, because I cared about this place and had difficulty completely noping out.

    Hopefully that clarifies things.

    https://youtu.be/ifaoKZfQpdA?si=ZMM-F5YD7b5KpEnh

    So lemme get this striggitty straight

    You took multiple mental health breaks from being a mod, but you're still seeking the same position again?

    And you were granted multiple such breaks and were repeatedly reinstated and also given special privileges While Also denying people self requested bans as it was "the policy" at the time but really the policies were whatever you and Kosh felt like doing that day or whatever

    A good place to start with all of this really, would be to do an apology tour. Say you're actually sorry, to the folks who you've actually hurt. Then maybe people would read your posts without a thick layer of smarm all over them

    No. He is in fact not seeking the same position

    Yeah, to be clear, I am specifically not signing up to be mod. That is a whole different kettle of sharks, and I think having sober discussions with a small group of peers would be a very different beast from actively moderating.

    https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/204849977-How-do-I-create-a-server

    wq09t4opzrlc.jpg
  • CelloCello Registered User regular
    Forar wrote: »
    zagdrob wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    okay so we just put up a forum poll that says "First read this 24 page thread, then vote on if you think this was okay or not"

    For candidate Jeffe. The rest of the board candidates we find out and get to vote on in 12 hours.

    I’m sure absolutely none of them have ever said or done anything that might be considered objectionable at some point…

    I would hope that everyone is running in good faith but I would also hope that if anyone else has been secretly reading and commenting on posts in the report forum then yeah, I truly would like to know who else has been violating our privacy

    Steam
    3DS Friend Code: 0216-0898-6512
    Switch Friend Code: SW-7437-1538-7786
  • lazegamerlazegamer The magnanimous cyberspaceRegistered User regular
    Tox wrote: »
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Question I feel that needs to be asked at some point.

    Now that everything is open, and the people can decide, if he is elected to a position, will people respect the process, or resume raising 23 kinds of hell about how he's the devil incarnate and shouldn't be trusted to be dogcatcher?

    Now that I know he won't keep his nose out of stuff it doesn't need to be in, I would have very strong reservations about maintaining my account on CoRe.

    This thread has unfortunately given me a list of such names.

    The admins seemed to have wanted him in the mod forums. Having someone you trust to help in a role they've been volunteering in for decades makes sense. It's a good way to get help without them having to be responsible for handing out infractions and warnings or taking the brunt of their complaints.

    I would download a car.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • QuetziQuetzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User, Moderator mod
    Forar wrote: »
    zagdrob wrote: »
    SniperGuy wrote: »
    okay so we just put up a forum poll that says "First read this 24 page thread, then vote on if you think this was okay or not"

    For candidate Jeffe. The rest of the board candidates we find out and get to vote on in 12 hours.

    I’m sure absolutely none of them have ever said or done anything that might be considered objectionable at some point…

    I mean honestly, I expect some of that may come up! That is unfortunately part of the nature of this process, and I wouldn't be surprised if we have people bringing up past faults of the candidates for the board.

    I would hope that each instance there doesn't turn into... what this turned into, but I think it's a messy bit that we are going to have to be prepared to potentially deal with.

  • HachfaceHachface Not the Minister Farrakhan you're thinking of Dammit, Shepard!Registered User regular
    .
    lazegamer wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Question I feel that needs to be asked at some point.

    Now that everything is open, and the people can decide, if he is elected to a position, will people respect the process, or resume raising 23 kinds of hell about how he's the devil incarnate and shouldn't be trusted to be dogcatcher?

    Now that I know he won't keep his nose out of stuff it doesn't need to be in, I would have very strong reservations about maintaining my account on CoRe.

    This thread has unfortunately given me a list of such names.

    The admins seemed to have wanted him in the mod forums. Having someone you trust to help in a role they've been volunteering in for decades makes sense. It's a good way to get help without them having to be responsible for handing out infractions and warnings or taking the brunt of their complaints.

    Creating the appearance that he is a non-mod user without making some kind of public articulation of how his technical permissions differ from most users is a deception.

  • Styrofoam SammichStyrofoam Sammich WANT. normal (not weird)Registered User regular
    lazegamer wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Question I feel that needs to be asked at some point.

    Now that everything is open, and the people can decide, if he is elected to a position, will people respect the process, or resume raising 23 kinds of hell about how he's the devil incarnate and shouldn't be trusted to be dogcatcher?

    Now that I know he won't keep his nose out of stuff it doesn't need to be in, I would have very strong reservations about maintaining my account on CoRe.

    This thread has unfortunately given me a list of such names.

    The admins seemed to have wanted him in the mod forums. Having someone you trust to help in a role they've been volunteering in for decades makes sense. It's a good way to get help without them having to be responsible for handing out infractions and warnings or taking the brunt of their complaints.

    Yeah, they fucked up too

    wq09t4opzrlc.jpg
  • minor incidentminor incident publicly subsidized! privately profitable!Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited March 31
    Hi all,

    We've clearly got a lot to address here, so please forgive me if this goes long. I'd have written something shorter if I had more time, etc. Some of this may be inconsequential by the time I get to post it because this thread is moving faster than I can even keep up with, but here goes.

    I should start off by saying something that some of you might have picked up on about me: I read everything. I've read every single post in every thread on the planning forum. I've read every post in the various forum reckoning threads from a year+ ago. I read every single message in several forum discords. I read every forum and discord DM I get. Many of the other folks involved in the transition and forum planning are similar, but hopefully they give themselves more of a break than I do.

    So, when I get hit up by half a dozen people in DMs and see another couple of dozen more begin to spiral with outrage in discord because they've learned something that they see as a breach of their trust in the forum moderation has been going on, I take them seriously. Just like I've taken every other person who has approached me with a serious concern about the forums, current or future. Doesn't matter whether I personally think Jeffe exhibited poor judgment or crossed a line to abuse his privileges. A lot of people felt that way, so we took up the discussion about it. Specifically, the chief complaint was that Jeffe's status on the forum was shown as "Regular User", not "Mod" or "Retired Mod", and so the assumption was that he had "Regular User" access only. It was pertinent because we were starting to work through related things in the Governance committee -- things like board member misconduct, what constitutes "good standing", malfeasance, abuse of authority, etc. Part of our job is to build our the guardrails to protect the community from all of those things.

    After a lot of discussion (this went on for weeks, on and off, because we didn't want to rush this) and a lot of differing opinions on how to handle it, we (the interim Board, the Governance Committee, and a couple of the PA mods who could help to confirm and deny the facts of the issue) landed on what felt like the most reasonable solution.

    Despite some sides arguing for it, we decided that it would be unjust to bar Jeffe from running for a board seat for two main reasons:
    1. Although we agreed that it was poor judgment on his part, the sanctioning of it was muddy at best because of a lack of consistency in moderation policies for decades at PA, and no real leadership for the mod team being in place to check and balance this kind of thing appropriately.
    2. We felt that even if the issue were 100% cut and dry, when it happened we had not yet drafted policies (let alone presented them to the community) to define misconduct and abuse of authority and it would be unreasonable to apply rules drafter after-the-fact to something Jeffe had done in the past.

    With that in mind, we tried to settle on the best course of action. This information was out there already, and we were (or at least I know I was) being asked every few days by someone or other if we had decided how to "handle it", with the clear implication that people were pissed and would absolutely make it a thing if it wasn't addressed. The complicating factor is that Jeffe had opted to run for a board seat. It'd be naive to think that if his name showed up on the ballot that none of these perturbed folks would make it a point to air all of the hearsay they've come across about the issue publicly.

    We decided to leave it up to Jeffe. I'm disappointed it was taken as "blackmail" because I don't see it as anything of the sort, and to be clear, despite what I've seen implied or inferred, we had no plans to spring any of this on the community as an unprompted warning to try to tank his chances. It was painfully obvious that this situation was going to be brought up by others within minutes of the ballot going live, and we'd be obligated to be honest in explaining the situation as we knew the facts, and it doesn't take a genius to predict exactly what a mess that's going to turn into (has now turned into). The alternative we offered is that if Jeffe preferred, he could not run and all of this no longer matters because the real crux of the problem was the idea of someone who had betrayed people's trust running for a position of authority on CoRe. We'd still address the fact that access to reports had been allowed to non-mods on PA, but that we were closing that loophole on CoRe. And this would be done in the appropriate thread about these policies and there'd be no reason to dig into naming names and pointing fingers over who had access because it's in the past, and we're simply ensuring it never happens again.

    You can take issue with the wording or presentation, that's fair. I drafted the message and had the other board members look it over to ensure the intent was clear. We thought it was. If it was more muddled than we intended, I can only really say that this was a delicate, messy situation and I'm not entirely sure there would be a perfect way to tell someone that they're walking into a shit storm and offer them a way to mitigate it. I fully understand that there's probably no scenario where that's a fun message to receive. But this was my attempt to be as neutral and direct as possible, lay out both paths that we saw clearly, and leave the ultimate decision up to Jeffe.

    Now, in a few hours, it's up to the community.




    As always, I'm available for any questions, but please tag me because I'm still catching up on this thread and other messages.

    minor incident on
    Hell, New Jersey, it said on the letter. Delivered without comment. So be it!
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • ToxTox I kill threads Dilige, et quod vis facRegistered User regular
    lazegamer wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Question I feel that needs to be asked at some point.

    Now that everything is open, and the people can decide, if he is elected to a position, will people respect the process, or resume raising 23 kinds of hell about how he's the devil incarnate and shouldn't be trusted to be dogcatcher?

    Now that I know he won't keep his nose out of stuff it doesn't need to be in, I would have very strong reservations about maintaining my account on CoRe.

    This thread has unfortunately given me a list of such names.

    The admins seemed to have wanted him in the mod forums. Having someone you trust to help in a role they've been volunteering in for decades makes sense. It's a good way to get help without them having to be responsible for handing out infractions and warnings or taking the brunt of their complaints.

    Sure but what happened is Jeffe said he wasn't gonna be a mod anymore, said he didn't want to moderate anymore, and then kept on reading Reports and commenting on them.

    Echo also was gonna step down as Mod. Then the Shutdown announcement came, and echo walked it back and said he would stay on through the transition.

    maybe the real panopticon was the friends we made along the way
  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    lazegamer wrote: »
    Tox wrote: »
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Question I feel that needs to be asked at some point.

    Now that everything is open, and the people can decide, if he is elected to a position, will people respect the process, or resume raising 23 kinds of hell about how he's the devil incarnate and shouldn't be trusted to be dogcatcher?

    Now that I know he won't keep his nose out of stuff it doesn't need to be in, I would have very strong reservations about maintaining my account on CoRe.

    This thread has unfortunately given me a list of such names.

    The admins seemed to have wanted him in the mod forums. Having someone you trust to help in a role they've been volunteering in for decades makes sense. It's a good way to get help without them having to be responsible for handing out infractions and warnings or taking the brunt of their complaints.

    Which is entirely reasonable

    buuuuut the way it was handled wasn't great to say the least

  • SniperGuySniperGuy SniperGuyGaming Registered User regular
    I was thinking about Houk's posts to me earlier. I just want to say that while I don't really agree about the severity of the problem of a former mod being able to post in the mod or report forum, I do understand why it would be to some. I get how frustrating that is and I am glad CoRe will have better rules around that. There's a fairly high temperature level in here and I hope that can come down and we can embrace the new forums and new space and all be happy we still have a cool place on the internet.

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    Hi all,

    We've clearly got a lot to address here, so please forgive me if this goes long. I'd have written something shorter if I had more time, etc. Some of this may be inconsequential by the time I get to post it because this thread is moving faster than I can even keep up with, but here goes.

    I should start off by saying something that some of you might have picked up on about me: I read everything. I've read every single post in every thread on the planning forum. I've read every post in the various forum reckoning threads from a year+ ago. I read every single message in several forum discords. I read every forum and discord DM I get. Many of the other folks involved in the transition and forum planning are similar, but hopefully they give themselves more of a break than I do.

    So, when I get hit up by half a dozen people in DMs and see another couple of dozen more begin to spiral with outrage in discord because they've learned something that they see as a breach of their trust in the forum moderation has been going on, I take them seriously. Just like I've taken every other person who has approached me with a serious concern about the forums, current or future. Doesn't matter whether I personally think Jeffe exhibited poor judgment or crossed a line to abuse his privileges. A lot of people felt that way, so we took up the discussion about it. Specifically, the chief complaint was that Jeffe's status on the forum was shown as "Regular User", not "Mod" or "Retired Mod", and so the assumption was that he had "Regular User" access only. It was pertinent because we were starting to work through related things in the Governance committee -- things like board member misconduct, what constitutes "good standing", malfeasance, abuse of authority, etc. Part of our job is to build our the guardrails to protect the community from all of those things.

    After a lot of discussion (this went on for weeks, on and off, because we didn't want to rush this) and a lot of differing opinions on how to handle it, we (the interim Board, the Governance Committee, and a couple of the PA mods who could help to confirm and deny the facts of the issue) landed on what felt like the most reasonable solution.

    Despite some sides arguing for it, we decided that it would be unjust to bar Jeffe from running for a board seat for two main reasons:
    1. Although we agreed that it was poor judgment on his part, the sanctioning of it was muddy at best because of a lack of consistency in moderation policies for decades at PA, and no real leadership for the mod team being in place to check and balance this kind of thing appropriately.
    2. We felt that even if the issue were 100% cut and dry, when it happened we had not yet drafted policies (let alone presented them to the community) to define misconduct and abuse of authority and it would be unreasonable to apply rules drafter after-the-fact to something Jeffe had done in the past.

    With that in mind, we tried to settle on the best course of action. This information was out there already, and we were (or at least I know I was) being asked every few days by someone or other if we had decided how to "handle it", with the clear implication that people were pissed and would absolutely make it a thing if it wasn't addressed. The complicating factor is that Jeffe had opted to run for a board seat. It'd be naive to think that if his name showed up on the ballot that none of these perturbed folks would make it a point to air all of the hearsay they've come across about the issue publicly.

    We decided to leave it up to Jeffe. I'm disappointed it was taken as "blackmail" because I don't see it as anything of the sort, and to be clear, despite what I've seen implied or inferred, we had no plans to spring any of this on the community as an unprompted warning to try to tank his chances. It was painfully obvious that this situation was going to be brought up by others within minutes of the ballot going live, and we'd be obligated to be honest in explaining the situation as we knew the facts, and it doesn't take a genius to predict exactly what a mess that's going to turn into (has now turned into). The alternative we offered is that if Jeffe preferred, he could not run and all of this no longer matters because the real crux of the problem was the idea of someone who had betrayed people's trust running for a position of authority on CoRe. We'd still address the fact that access to reports had been allowed to non-mods on PA, but that we were closing that loophole on CoRe. And this would be done in the appropriate thread about these policies and there'd be no reason to dig into naming names and pointing fingers over who had access because it's in the past, and we're simply ensuring it never happens again.

    You can take issue with the wording or presentation, that's fair. I drafted the message and had the other board members look it over to ensure the intent was clear. We thought it was. If it was more muddled than we intended, I can only really say that this was a delicate, messy situation and I'm not entirely sure there would be a perfect way to tell someone that they're walking into a shit storm and offer them a way to mitigate it. I fully understand that there's probably no scenario where that's a fun message to receive. But this was my attempt to be as neutral and direct as possible, lay out both paths that we saw clearly, and leave the ultimate decision up to Jeffe.

    Now, in a few hours, it's up to the community.




    As always, I'm available for any questions, but please tag me because I'm still catching up on this thread and other messages.

    Probably good to totp this

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

  • QuetziQuetzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User, Moderator mod
    Hey all, this thread is an absolute mess, and I think we all know it, and it's burning real bright still

    And uhh, some of the mods want to get some sleep, so we're gonna shut it down for a bit

    I'll unlock it in the morning if nobody else beats me to it

    Geth, lock the thread

  • GethGeth Legion Perseus VeilRegistered User, Moderator, Penny Arcade Staff, Vanilla Staff vanilla
    Affirmative Quetzi. Closing thread...

This discussion has been closed.