The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Y'all is a contraction of "you" and "all", which is the second person plural in english. Some feel that the second person plural in english does not exist or, rather, the form of the second person plural is something other than "ya'll" or "y'all".
You-all functions with perfect grammatical regularity as a second person plural pronoun, taking its own possessive you-all's (or less frequently, your-all's, where both parts of the word are inflected for possession): You-all's voices sound alike. Southerners do not, as is sometimes believed, use you-all or y'all for both singular and plural you. A single person may only be addressed as you-all if the speaker implies in the reference other persons not present: Did you-all [you and others] have dinner yet? You and you-all preserve the singular/plural distinction that English used to have in thou and ye, the subject forms of singular and plural you, respectively (thee and you were the singular and plural object forms). The distinction between singular thou/thee and plural ye/you began to blur as early as the 13th century, when the plural form was often used for the singular in formal contexts or to indicate politeness, much as the French use tu for singular and familiar "you," and vous for both plural and polite singular "you." In English, the object form you gradually came to be used in subject position as well, so that the four forms thou, thee, ye, and you collapsed into one form, you. Thou and thee were quite rare in educated speech in the 16th century, and they disappeared completely from standard English in the 18th. However, the distinction between singular and plural you is just as useful as that between other singular and plural pronoun forms, such as I and we. In addition to y'all, other forms for plural you include you-uns, youse, and you guys or youse guys. Youse is common in vernacular varieties in the Northeast, particularly in large cities such as New York and Boston, and is also common in Irish English.
Also, here is a list of english personal pronouns, from wikipedia:
* I (1st. person singular)
* Thou (2nd. person singular, archaic)
* You (2nd. person singular/plural)
* He (3rd. person singular, masculine)
* She (3rd. person singular, feminine)
* It (3rd. person singular, neuter)
* One (morphologically 3rd. person singular, though semantically equivalent to "we")
* We (1st. person plural)
* Y'all (2nd. person plural, dialectal)
* Ye (2nd. person plural, archaic)
* They (3rd. person plural)
That is not how the word is used. "Y'all" is used both in a singular and plural, and only in certain regions of the country, which are world-reknowned for their lack of education. "You all" is not the second-person plural. You are making shit up, and trying to call it a language. "You all" isn't even a grammatically correct structure.
The second person plural is not "you all". The second person plural is "you". "You all" is the second person plural followed by the word "all".
And there are rules on how you can contract words. You cannot pick any two random words and contract them. You and all cannot be contracted. "Y'all" is not a real word.
Richy on
0
tuxkamenreally took this picture.Registered Userregular
edited June 2007
I thought that in English, the second person plural is 'you'.
'All' has nothing to do with it. Y'all may be valid as a qualifier, but that's all it is.
That is not how the word is used. "Y'all" is used both in a singular and plural, and only in certain regions of the country, which are world-reknowned for their lack of education.
To use "ya'll" as the second person singular is to use a word incorrectly.
An instance of a person using a word incorrectly does not mean that the word itself is incorrect.
If a child refers to a cat as a "dog" this is not indicative of some fault of the word "dog".
The second person plural is not "you all". The second person plural is "you". "You all" is the second person plural followed by the word "all".
And there are rules on how you can contract words. You cannot pick any two random words and contract them. You and all cannot be contracted. "Y'all" is not a real word.
I'm not going to argue it's not real--it's real enough for the purposes of this.
However, it's totally unnecessary.
We don't use 'ye' any more, only 'you'. It is used for both forms, unlike other languages that make the distinction (tu v. su, tous v. vous, so on).
To use "ya'll" as the second person singular is to use a word incorrectly.
To use "ya'll" at all is to use a word incorrectly. Because "ya'll" is not a word.
It is a word because it both appears in the dictionary (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/y'all) and is a sensible contraction of two words "you" and "all" which are the words used to form the second person plural in english.
You calling it an incorrect statement doesn't make it an incorrect statement. The grammar rules of the English language have priority on your opinion, and they say I am right and you are wrong.
That is not how the word is used. "Y'all" is used both in a singular and plural, and only in certain regions of the country, which are world-reknowned for their lack of education.
To use "ya'll" as the second person singular is to use a word incorrectly.
An instance of a person using a word incorrectly does not mean that the word itself is incorrect.
If a child refers to a cat as a "dog" this is not indicative of some fault of the word "dog".
If everyone who uses it uses it like that, though, with only a few exceptions, then I'd say a cat is, indeed, a dog, at least by your logic.
For those who would argue that is is not a contraction because contractions have only one letter after the apostrophe: ma'am
I haven't seen anyone make that argument.
I have seen people make the argument that it's not a contraction because you don't have the right to pick any two words that take your fancy and contract them. And they're right.
Now quit picking random words, contracting them, and pretending it's a real word.
Or if you prefer:
No'it pick'dom words, cont'em, an'tending it's a re'rd.
For those who would argue that is is not a contraction because contractions have only one letter after the apostrophe: ma'am
I haven't seen anyone make that argument.
I have seen people make the argument that it's not a contraction because you don't have the right to pick any two words that take your fancy and contract them. And they're right.
Now quit picking random words, contracting them, and pretending it's a real word.
Or if you prefer:
No'it pick'dom words, cont'em, an'tending it's a re'rd.
It's not two random words!
It's the two words which form the second person plural in english.
The grammar rules of the English language have priority on your opinion, and they say I am right and you are wrong.
Citation?
Every single English grammar book ever written.
Fuck, you're the one making the claim. Show me a grammar book that says picking random words and contracting them for fun (not to mention alternating the spelling from y'all to ya'll every five uses) is a valid grammar rule.
Richy on
0
MrMisterJesus dying on the cross in pain? Morally better than us. One has to go "all in".Registered Userregular
edited June 2007
Y'all is a part of certain dialects of English. I'm at a loss for what more could be said about it.
For those who would argue that is is not a contraction because contractions have only one letter after the apostrophe: ma'am
I haven't seen anyone make that argument.
I have seen people make the argument that it's not a contraction because you don't have the right to pick any two words that take your fancy and contract them. And they're right.
Now quit picking random words, contracting them, and pretending it's a real word.
Or if you prefer:
No'it pick'dom words, cont'em, an'tending it's a re'rd.
It's not two random words!
It's the two words which form the second person plural in english.
No.
'You' is the second person plural in English.
'You all' is just a qualifier of something that is already the second person plural based on context, because people don't want to say 'ye'.
For those who would argue that is is not a contraction because contractions have only one letter after the apostrophe: ma'am
I haven't seen anyone make that argument.
I have seen people make the argument that it's not a contraction because you don't have the right to pick any two words that take your fancy and contract them. And they're right.
Now quit picking random words, contracting them, and pretending it's a real word.
Or if you prefer:
No'it pick'dom words, cont'em, an'tending it's a re'rd.
It's not two random words!
It's the two words which form the second person plural in english.
No.
'You' is the second person plural in English.
'You all' is just a qualifier of something that is already the second person plural based on context, because people don't want to say 'ye'.
"You all" is the second person plural in english because "you" is the second person singular.
You-all functions with perfect grammatical regularity as a second person plural pronoun, taking its own possessive you-all's (or less frequently, your-all's, where both parts of the word are inflected for possession): You-all's voices sound alike. Southerners do not, as is sometimes believed, use you-all or y'all for both singular and plural you. A single person may only be addressed as you-all if the speaker implies in the reference other persons not present: Did you-all [you and others] have dinner yet? You and you-all preserve the singular/plural distinction that English used to have in thou and ye, the subject forms of singular and plural you, respectively (thee and you were the singular and plural object forms). The distinction between singular thou/thee and plural ye/you began to blur as early as the 13th century, when the plural form was often used for the singular in formal contexts or to indicate politeness, much as the French use tu for singular and familiar "you," and vous for both plural and polite singular "you." In English, the object form you gradually came to be used in subject position as well, so that the four forms thou, thee, ye, and you collapsed into one form, you. Thou and thee were quite rare in educated speech in the 16th century, and they disappeared completely from standard English in the 18th. However, the distinction between singular and plural you is just as useful as that between other singular and plural pronoun forms, such as I and we. In addition to y'all, other forms for plural you include you-uns, youse, and you guys or youse guys. Youse is common in vernacular varieties in the Northeast, particularly in large cities such as New York and Boston, and is also common in Irish English.
"You all" is the second person plural in english because "you" is the second person singular.
You is both the second person singular and the second person plural. It can be both. And it is both. And the fact you can't understand that doesn't affect English grammar.
Also, here is a list of english personal pronouns, from wikipedia:
* I (1st. person singular)
* Thou (2nd. person singular, archaic)
* You (2nd. person singular/plural)
* He (3rd. person singular, masculine)
* She (3rd. person singular, feminine)
* It (3rd. person singular, neuter)
* One (morphologically 3rd. person singular, though semantically equivalent to "we")
* We (1st. person plural)
* Y'all (2nd. person plural, dialectal)
* Ye (2nd. person plural, archaic)
* They (3rd. person plural)
You-all functions with perfect grammatical regularity as a second person plural pronoun, taking its own possessive you-all's (or less frequently, your-all's, where both parts of the word are inflected for possession): You-all's voices sound alike. Southerners do not, as is sometimes believed, use you-all or y'all for both singular and plural you. A single person may only be addressed as you-all if the speaker implies in the reference other persons not present: Did you-all [you and others] have dinner yet? You and you-all preserve the singular/plural distinction that English used to have in thou and ye, the subject forms of singular and plural you, respectively (thee and you were the singular and plural object forms). The distinction between singular thou/thee and plural ye/you began to blur as early as the 13th century, when the plural form was often used for the singular in formal contexts or to indicate politeness, much as the French use tu for singular and familiar "you," and vous for both plural and polite singular "you." In English, the object form you gradually came to be used in subject position as well, so that the four forms thou, thee, ye, and you collapsed into one form, you. Thou and thee were quite rare in educated speech in the 16th century, and they disappeared completely from standard English in the 18th. However, the distinction between singular and plural you is just as useful as that between other singular and plural pronoun forms, such as I and we. In addition to y'all, other forms for plural you include you-uns, youse, and you guys or youse guys. Youse is common in vernacular varieties in the Northeast, particularly in large cities such as New York and Boston, and is also common in Irish English.
_J_ on
0
tuxkamenreally took this picture.Registered Userregular
For those who would argue that is is not a contraction because contractions have only one letter after the apostrophe: ma'am
I haven't seen anyone make that argument.
I have seen people make the argument that it's not a contraction because you don't have the right to pick any two words that take your fancy and contract them. And they're right.
Now quit picking random words, contracting them, and pretending it's a real word.
Or if you prefer:
No'it pick'dom words, cont'em, an'tending it's a re'rd.
It's not two random words!
It's the two words which form the second person plural in english.
No.
'You' is the second person plural in English.
'You all' is just a qualifier of something that is already the second person plural based on context, because people don't want to say 'ye'.
"You all" is the second person plural in english because "you" is the second person singular.
...um, no.
I know that, historically, you get your kicks to dirty Conjunction Junction fanmovies, but you don't get to make pronouns up just because you say so. 'You all' is a qualified version of 'you' that emphasizes second person. The all is absolutely unnecessary; 'you' is sufficient to denote either second person singular or plural. That's why everyone else outside of the South, including England (who has a say in this), uses 'you' only.
"You all" is the second person plural in english because "you" is the second person singular.
You is both the second person singular and the second person plural. It can be both. And it is both. And the fact you can't understand that doesn't affect English grammar.
You still haven't supported that claim with anything but you saying it.
My team, however, has provided at least 3 outside sources which support "you all" as the second person plural.
_J_ on
0
tuxkamenreally took this picture.Registered Userregular
edited June 2007
Yes, it is a dialect-based usage (note the 'chiefly Southern U.S.'). It is grammatically regular.
It is, however, exactly like me saying 'They all wanted more onion rings'. The all is not necessary to the existence of the third-person pronoun.
Posts
Thread over.
"y'all" is a word. "You" and "all" (the components of the second person plural) are not random words.
Thread continues.
And there are rules on how you can contract words. You cannot pick any two random words and contract them. You and all cannot be contracted. "Y'all" is not a real word.
'All' has nothing to do with it. Y'all may be valid as a qualifier, but that's all it is.
Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla
To use "ya'll" as the second person singular is to use a word incorrectly.
An instance of a person using a word incorrectly does not mean that the word itself is incorrect.
If a child refers to a cat as a "dog" this is not indicative of some fault of the word "dog".
That is an incorrect statement.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/y'all
I'm not going to argue it's not real--it's real enough for the purposes of this.
However, it's totally unnecessary.
We don't use 'ye' any more, only 'you'. It is used for both forms, unlike other languages that make the distinction (tu v. su, tous v. vous, so on).
Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla
It is a word because it both appears in the dictionary (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/y'all) and is a sensible contraction of two words "you" and "all" which are the words used to form the second person plural in english.
Whatever words native english speakers use - those are correct English.
Shinto!
India needs you.
Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla
Citation?
I'll be damned if anyone would actually try to use that argument. We've better reasons to complain.
Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla
The other players in the civ game need to form their own parties and policies for a while.
It was getting kind of weird there. Little too much Shinto love.
I have seen people make the argument that it's not a contraction because you don't have the right to pick any two words that take your fancy and contract them. And they're right.
Now quit picking random words, contracting them, and pretending it's a real word.
Or if you prefer:
No'it pick'dom words, cont'em, an'tending it's a re'rd.
You are correct.
See? I used "you" because I was using the second person singular.
It's not two random words!
It's the two words which form the second person plural in english.
Fuck, you're the one making the claim. Show me a grammar book that says picking random words and contracting them for fun (not to mention alternating the spelling from y'all to ya'll every five uses) is a valid grammar rule.
No.
'You' is the second person plural in English.
'You all' is just a qualifier of something that is already the second person plural based on context, because people don't want to say 'ye'.
Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla
Fixed.
"You all" is the second person plural in english because "you" is the second person singular.
...um, no.
I know that, historically, you get your kicks to dirty Conjunction Junction fanmovies, but you don't get to make pronouns up just because you say so. 'You all' is a qualified version of 'you' that emphasizes second person. The all is absolutely unnecessary; 'you' is sufficient to denote either second person singular or plural. That's why everyone else outside of the South, including England (who has a say in this), uses 'you' only.
Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla
You still haven't supported that claim with anything but you saying it.
My team, however, has provided at least 3 outside sources which support "you all" as the second person plural.
It is, however, exactly like me saying 'They all wanted more onion rings'. The all is not necessary to the existence of the third-person pronoun.
Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla