As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
We're funding a new Acquisitions Incorporated series on Kickstarter right now! Check it out at https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pennyarcade/acquisitions-incorporated-the-series-2

Civilization 4: Beyond the Sword Megadetails; Holy fucking Zeus. NSF the illiterate.

17810121323

Posts

  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited July 2007
    Capped cities work a lot better in Civ4 than in CivIII, where they were REALLY useless.

    I distinctly recall one of the better ways of dealing with foreign citizens in Civ 3 was to starve the city to death, killing all the natives, then let them repopulate it as your own.

    Aroduc on
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Hey, when did the Gaelic Swordsmen get made less sucky? Now they just need copper or iron instead of Iron. The Celts still get shafted overall, but at least it's somewhat better.
    I lied. Rather I just saw what Forester 3 does. It makes Guerilla 3 look like a pile of shit.

    I'm amazed at the total crap they give to the Celts. Bah.

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited July 2007
    Hey, when did the Gaelic Swordsmen get made less sucky? Now they just need copper or iron instead of Iron. The Celts still get shafted overall, but at least it's somewhat better.
    I lied. Rather I just saw what Forester 3 does. It makes Guerilla 3 look like a pile of shit.

    I'm amazed at the total crap they give to the Celts. Bah.

    The vast majority of the unique units are worthless. I like the ones that actually make the units even worse, personally.

    Aroduc on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Aroduc wrote: »
    Capped cities work a lot better in Civ4 than in CivIII, where they were REALLY useless.

    I distinctly recall one of the better ways of dealing with foreign citizens in Civ 3 was to starve the city to death, killing all the natives, then let them repopulate it as your own.

    Yeah, and on top of that corruption was ludicrous. even if you founded them, cities in other continents were completely useless, they lost something like 90% of the production to corruption.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I use the gallic swordsman as a raider, primarily.

    The roman unique building is incredible-functions as a market with 25% gold increase and 25% great people speed increase.

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • The_LightbringerThe_Lightbringer Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    So, how are people finding the new civilizations? Any civs becoming the new Darius?

    The_Lightbringer on
    LuciferSig.jpg
  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited July 2007
    Ergandar wrote: »
    I use the gallic swordsman as a raider, primarily.

    The roman unique building is incredible-functions as a market with 25% gold increase and 25% great people speed increase.

    Meh. Considering that only maybe three or four cities are producing great people, it's pretty wasted for the most part.

    Now the Ottoman +2 Happiness Aqueducts... those are damn nice.

    Aroduc on
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Which civs do you guys use in general?

    I like playing as Isabella

    Spiritual is wicked, probably my favourite trait. Maybe because I'm impatient.

    Also fishing and mysticism are awesome to start with. Mysticism = instant religion. Fishing = instant coastal tile improvements. Really helpful. Has anyone noticed more coastal resources in BtS? I seem to be getting a lot of cities in range of three or even four clams.

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • BibbleBibble __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    What the word on corporations? Broken? Or being used woefully incorrectly? Theres a lot of commotion on civfanatics about it. Good and bad feedback. Although of course the angry people are always louder. Tell us your stories, good and bad, of corprations.

    Bibble on
    2jezcsmjpg.gif
  • The JudgeThe Judge The Terwilliger CurvesRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    bsjezz wrote: »
    Has anyone noticed more coastal resources in BtS? I seem to be getting a lot of cities in range of three or even four clams.
    Good lord, yes. I fired up the Dutch for my first game with BtS and the sheer amount of seafood within the working range of Amsterdam is ridiculous. 3 clams and 1 fish. Missed a second fish by one square.

    The Judge on
    Last pint: Focal Banger / The Alchemist - Untappd: TheJudge_PDX
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I'm annihilating brennus's cavalry with the renowned roman machine gunner corps

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • PunkBoyPunkBoy Thank you! And thank you again! Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    It feels so sweet to deny the Persians any iron and copper. They were stuck with Archers and Warriors while I came in with Swordsmen. Persia's now only 2 level 2 cities.

    PunkBoy on
    Steam ID:
    steam_sig.png
    The Linecutters Podcast: Your weekly dose of nerd! Tune in for the live broadcast every Wednesday at 7 PM EST, only at www.non-productive.com!
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    OK, Aroduc-this is odd; I mine uranium, it is attached to my cities via railroad-yet I am not capable of producing subs or any similar units, and the uranium resource is not displayed on my screen.

    Nevermind-it also requires fission

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • OmeksOmeks Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Why why why why why why why don't any of my local stores have BtS? Wal-Mart even lists the shipping date as being Monday, July 23rd.

    I wasted my lunch break going to places trying to find it...

    Omeks on
    Online Info (Click Spoiler for More):
    |Xbox Live Tag: Omeks
    |PSN Tag: Omeks_R7
    |Rock Band: Profile|DLC Collection
    Omeks.png
  • BibbleBibble __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    I assume the new Darius is the new Darius.

    But I don't think that's what you meant.

    Bibble on
    2jezcsmjpg.gif
  • ErgandarErgandar Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Urk-what's the required score to ascend higher than dan quayle on noble?

    Ergandar on
    RachelSig.jpg
  • ImperfectImperfect Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Guys, the REAL question is: is the Netcode any better? I fondly remember nights spent playing this with some of you folks back with Civ IV first dropped - well, fondly until Civ inevitably crashed heinously.

    Imperfect on
  • KiTAKiTA Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    So Aroduc... setting Workers to automated is worthless? Why? I've found they're usually pretty good at it.

    KiTA on
  • The_LightbringerThe_Lightbringer Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Sometimes they rebuild improvements that you don't want rebuild.

    Like say you want a bunch of workshops, the workers more often than not will turn it all into cottages.

    The_Lightbringer on
    LuciferSig.jpg
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    KiTA wrote: »
    So Aroduc... setting Workers to automated is worthless? Why? I've found they're usually pretty good at it.

    i think there's an option deep in there somewhere to ensure workers don't pull down old improvements to put something new up when automated

    if you make sure to get all the primary resource improvements and required farm tiles quickly, switching automated workers on later in the game cuts a lot of the drudge

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited July 2007
    KiTA wrote: »
    So Aroduc... setting Workers to automated is worthless? Why? I've found they're usually pretty good at it.

    I said the opposite actually. I set workers to automated all the time. They just don't really take a big picture view of your civilization and tend to do strange things is all.

    Aroduc on
  • Disco BanditDisco Bandit Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Is it just me or does this run super smooth compared to Warlords/regular Civ 4? There's like no load for me at all compared to Warloads. Maybe it's cuz this is the Steam version?

    Anyway, I like it a lot so far.

    Disco Bandit on
    Pokemon Diamond: 5412 9146 7564
  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited July 2007
    Is it just me or does this run super smooth compared to Warlords/regular Civ 4? There's like no load for me at all compared to Warloads. Maybe it's cuz this is the Steam version?

    Anyway, I like it a lot so far.

    I've noticed the super speedy loadtimes for new games, but that's about it.

    Aroduc on
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I'm musing over trying to run a culture victory without creating any world wonders

    I just really want to get the knack of using Artist specialists because I think they could be an awesome tool

    also building wonders is so stressful, especially with competitive AIs

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • NewresNewres Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Just lost a game on Prince, one of the first times I actually played on that difficulty. The map was divided into 3 continents: 2 small ones with one civ each (me as Sumerians on the northern Napoleon on the southern), and the rest of the civs on the big one. At first I was happy with the situation, lots of possibilities to expand (might have overextended myself somewhat too). So I build it full until I get Galleons and decide to take out little corporal. Good thing too, just as my fully loaded Galleons head into his direction he declares war. A very prolonged battle follows because we are evenly matched,well not exactly but he has an insane amount of cavalry so I needed to turtle a lot with a huge number of units. I managed to take 2 of it's cities than declare peace because the war weariness is crippling (got like +8 or so unhappy people from it :( ).

    Meanwhile on the other continent there are smaller skirmishes. Washington pulls of an awesome tactic where he gangs up on a losing civ but remaining outside of conflicts and concentrating on the tech. Meanwhile the cities war on the other continent thing cripples me. Eventually I restart the war and take the whole lower continent but I am really behind on research thanks to the upkeep.

    Than the new expansion kicks in and Miss Egyptian Queen attacks my newly acquired cities. I actually got a defensive pact with Washington but that proves my undoing. I fend off both the Egyptians and later the English, but while I am building a huge navy to counter all their forces, he attacks on land, conquers their cities and makes them his vassals. Meanwhile I am still stuck on 2 continents with a large upkeep, and never recover from that. His ship arrived on AC when I still needed two turns to finish mine fully.

    Newres on
    960751-1.png
  • DisruptorX2DisruptorX2 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    So, um, I didn't read it anywhere, does this need Warlords? Or just the original game? Cause I don't have warlords but do have civ 4.

    DisruptorX2 on
    1208768734831.jpg
  • BibbleBibble __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    You just need Civ 4. It will add everyhting warlords added, minus the warlords scenarios

    Bibble on
    2jezcsmjpg.gif
  • Triple BTriple B Bastard of the North MARegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Aroduc wrote: »
    Hey, when did the Gaelic Swordsmen get made less sucky? Now they just need copper or iron instead of Iron. The Celts still get shafted overall, but at least it's somewhat better.
    I lied. Rather I just saw what Forester 3 does. It makes Guerilla 3 look like a pile of shit.

    I'm amazed at the total crap they give to the Celts. Bah.

    The vast majority of the unique units are worthless. I like the ones that actually make the units even worse, personally.

    Today, I wiped out Tokugawa within the first 10 turns of the game because of Huayna Capac's unique unit being a replacement for the initial Warrior unit. I had *one* of them, and I met Tokugawa relatively close to my starting point, so I figured just for the hell of it, I'd try to take him out quick. I saved my game, and marched my one unique unit into his one city. Of course, it destroyed his basic Warrior, and I razed his city, eliminating him before he could be come anything more than one city and one Warrior. It was quite a thing.

    Triple B on
    Steam/XBL/PSN: FiveAgainst1
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Triple B wrote: »
    Today, I wiped out Tokugawa within the first 10 turns of the game because of Huayna Capac's unique unit being a replacement for the initial Warrior unit. I had *one* of them, and I met Tokugawa relatively close to my starting point, so I figured just for the hell of it, I'd try to take him out quick. I saved my game, and marched my one unique unit into his one city. Of course, it destroyed his basic Warrior, and I razed his city, eliminating him before he could be come anything more than one city and one Warrior. It was quite a thing.
    Some of the units are awesome. The Incan's is good even if it gets outdated quick. A few of the units just suck though. Sometimes they don't need the resource normally needed to make them which is nice, unless you're swimming in Iron and you'd rather just have the extra point of strength.

    I'd forgotten the shafting the Celt's get. A unique unit with a free promotion I never take and a unique building I rarely build that gives a bonus that I still don't care about. Hell, IIRC it doesn't even stack on the swordsman.

    Bah.

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited July 2007
    Triple B wrote: »
    Aroduc wrote: »
    Hey, when did the Gaelic Swordsmen get made less sucky? Now they just need copper or iron instead of Iron. The Celts still get shafted overall, but at least it's somewhat better.
    I lied. Rather I just saw what Forester 3 does. It makes Guerilla 3 look like a pile of shit.

    I'm amazed at the total crap they give to the Celts. Bah.

    The vast majority of the unique units are worthless. I like the ones that actually make the units even worse, personally.

    Today, I wiped out Tokugawa within the first 10 turns of the game because of Huayna Capac's unique unit being a replacement for the initial Warrior unit. I had *one* of them, and I met Tokugawa relatively close to my starting point, so I figured just for the hell of it, I'd try to take him out quick. I saved my game, and marched my one unique unit into his one city. Of course, it destroyed his basic Warrior, and I razed his city, eliminating him before he could be come anything more than one city and one Warrior. It was quite a thing.

    Pfft.

    civbts%20(14)_th.jpg

    civbts%20(32)_th.jpg

    Though even for me, that's unusually bloody.

    Aroduc on
  • NewresNewres Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Aroduc wrote: »
    Triple B wrote: »
    Aroduc wrote: »
    Hey, when did the Gaelic Swordsmen get made less sucky? Now they just need copper or iron instead of Iron. The Celts still get shafted overall, but at least it's somewhat better.
    I lied. Rather I just saw what Forester 3 does. It makes Guerilla 3 look like a pile of shit.

    I'm amazed at the total crap they give to the Celts. Bah.

    The vast majority of the unique units are worthless. I like the ones that actually make the units even worse, personally.

    Today, I wiped out Tokugawa within the first 10 turns of the game because of Huayna Capac's unique unit being a replacement for the initial Warrior unit. I had *one* of them, and I met Tokugawa relatively close to my starting point, so I figured just for the hell of it, I'd try to take him out quick. I saved my game, and marched my one unique unit into his one city. Of course, it destroyed his basic Warrior, and I razed his city, eliminating him before he could be come anything more than one city and one Warrior. It was quite a thing.

    Pfft.

    civbts%20(14)_th.jpg

    civbts%20(32)_th.jpg

    Though even for me, that's unusually bloody.


    Well I just had a start on Prince where the Incans beat me pretty badly. My sole neighbor were the mongols so I was beefing my defense up for them when out of nowhere that asshole (well I have yet to play a game where he is not ridiculously aggresieve) declares war. He even had my religion too....

    Newres on
    960751-1.png
  • themightypuckthemightypuck MontanaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I've never been able to pull off a successful quecha rush.

    themightypuck on
    “Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears.”
    ― Marcus Aurelius

    Path of Exile: themightypuck
  • Bob The MonkeyBob The Monkey Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    oh gosh

    lost painfully last night after forgetting that forcing everyone to give you things for free early in the game means everybody invades you later on

    everybody

    Bob The Monkey on
  • Triple BTriple B Bastard of the North MARegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    oh gosh

    lost painfully last night after forgetting that forcing everyone to give you things for free early in the game means everybody invades you later on

    everybody

    Heh. That's one of the deciding factors in whether or not a Civ game goes your way, is your ability to distinguish between when it's time to be nice and accept the offers presented to you, and when it's time to tell them all to forward all requests to your left butt cheek.

    Triple B on
    Steam/XBL/PSN: FiveAgainst1
  • PisskidPisskid Registered User new member
    edited July 2007
    Damnit! Even though I really suck ass at these Civilization games, I'm torn between buying Civ 4 along with Beyond the Sword, or just trying to hold out for a super-mega-pack thing which will probably be released in the future.

    Guys, what should I do...

    WHAT. SHOULD. I. DO?!

    Pisskid on
  • LeztaLezta Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    You want to play it now, so, buy it now?

    Lezta on
  • GoodOmensGoodOmens Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    bsjezz wrote: »

    Also fishing and mysticism are awesome to start with. Mysticism = instant religion. Fishing = instant coastal tile improvements. Really helpful. Has anyone noticed more coastal resources in BtS? I seem to be getting a lot of cities in range of three or even four clams.

    Fishing is great to start, but only if you end up coastal. That said, there does seem to be more seafood...last night I started as Egypt with 3 fish, clams, and crabs in my BFC, plus gold and corn.

    GoodOmens on
    steam_sig.png
    IOS Game Center ID: Isotope-X
  • bongibongi regular
    edited July 2007
    I still seem to have trouble getting copper or iron anywhere near my territory

    I wondered if it might be a problem with using a no-cd patch like the other guy who only had 10 turns per game, so I'm not putting the CD in instead, but there's still no copper or iron anywhere

    bongi on
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    whee, I got my no-world-wonders cultural victory on Noble. I did make the religious wonders, but that was it. Religion was a huge part, luckily there were five religions on my continent (4 founded by me) and I spread them to every city. Getting all the Mandirs etc. in each of my top 3 cities took a while but the culture boost is awesome. I ended up charging to the finish line by 1944 with some wicked peripheral cities pumping out infantries every turn - though I never once got into a war. diplomacy is the way!

    it was a good challenge

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • Future BluesFuture Blues Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    When you build something that gives you a free specialist, do you have to go back and actually pick out that specialist yourself in the corresponding city?

    Another thing... I usually end up building most buildings in most cities. Should I instead pick one thing to focus on, like Science or Culture and ignore most of the other buildings in that city unless they're specifically asked for and just build military once that singular purpose is spelled out?

    Also, can anybody tell me how espionage works? What does setting the "Weight" of a civ on the Espionage screen do? I was playing around with it a little, and it seemed that I started seeing the current tech they were researching, but other than that I didn't see any other change. Does this do more? Is it worth setting it past 1 or 2?

    Future Blues on
    Xbox Live: No Reply
    Steam: Jacobontap
    LoL: FutureBlues
Sign In or Register to comment.