The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Filming of Tom Cruise movie banned in Germany

179111213

Posts

  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Glaeal you haven't said anything that Preacher hasn't.

    edit: Looking back on this page I've directly responded to one post from each of you. Whats the problem?

    LiveWire on
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Let's say the country was Israel and the actor happened to be a member of Hizbullah. I don't think it matters that he hasn't participated in any kidnappings, rocket attacks, or suicide bombings.

    The church of Scientology's actions certainly are less violent than Hizbullah, but so far as the organization is regarded as antagonistic and dangerous, I see no compelling reason to treat any members as exempt.
    Glaeal wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Allowing an American film company to film on government property using an actor who in his private life is a Scientologist means that Germany is "associating with terrorists"?
    Allowing a member of a terrorist organization to access government property is.
    Glaeal wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    I see no real justification for it in Tom Cruises case. The worry is that he is somehow going to sneak off set and into some Generals office to photograph documents of troop movements or something? "Stretching the imagination" is a phrase that doesn't even begin to cover it.

    edit: Preacher, the USA and Germany are both western countries with laws that protect discrimination of religion. I don't see how you can not see the relevance.

    If in the next few days Edward Norton was revealed to be an active member of the KKK, and he was scheduled to begin filming a movie about the American Revolution on an American military base, would it be reasonable for them deny them rights to film the movie?

    *edit* And once again, since you don't seem to be getting this, Germany considers Scientology a dangerous cult and has classified it as one, which means that Scientology isn't protected by the discrimination laws.

    Glaeal on
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Livewire you'remaking false comparisions. Getting film permits is not a right. They're not denying him rights that everyone else gets. They're electing not to grant the film special permission ot shoot on government land.

    Hell the US miltary has denied permits and support to movies they don't think makes the miltary look good.

    nexuscrawler on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Livewire you'remaking false comparisions. Getting film permits is not a right. They're not denying him rights that everyone else gets. They're electing not to grant the film special permission ot shoot on government land.

    Hell the US miltary has denied permits and support to movies they don't think makes the miltary look good.

    Not on the basis of the actor's religion. No, my analogy is perfect. You can refuse service to someone for any reason(even if its a stupid reason). However, you CANNOT BY LAW refuse service to someone because you don't like their religion. Germany cited Cruises scientology as the reason; nothing else.

    LiveWire on
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Livewire you'remaking false comparisions. Getting film permits is not a right. They're not denying him rights that everyone else gets. They're electing not to grant the film special permission ot shoot on government land.

    Hell the US miltary has denied permits and support to movies they don't think makes the miltary look good.

    Not on the basis of the actor's religion. No, my analogy is perfect. You can refuse service to someone for any reason(even if its a stupid reason). However, you CANNOT BY LAW refuse service to someone because you don't like their religion. Germany cited Cruises scientology as the reason; nothing else.
    Glaeal wrote: »
    *edit* And once again, since you don't seem to be getting this, Germany considers Scientology a dangerous cult and has classified it as one, which means that Scientology isn't protected by the discrimination laws.

    Glaeal on
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Getting permission to shoot on thier govenrnment property IS NOT A RIGHT. i can't march into the Pentagon and a "say I'm shooting a movie you have ot give me a permit now". I have to go through the government and get special permissions first.

    In the US not being discriminated agianst based on religion, race and such is a RIGHT guarenteed by law. your relgion and such do not give you special rights above and beyond everyone else. Similar rights exist in Germany.

    nexuscrawler on
  • nialscorvanialscorva Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote:
    Hey, I'm a restaurant owner and I'm going allow these 30 other people to spend their money and eat, but not this one certain fellow because I hate him and we never get along.
    Hey, I'm a restaurant owner and I'm going to allow these 30 other people to spend their money and eat, but not this one certain fellow because he is a Jew.

    Guess which one is illegal.

    I'm pretty sure neither is illegal. You can deny service to pretty much anyone for any reason. There might be a civil action and state laws to complicate a simple answer, though.

    nialscorva on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    nialscorva wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure neither is illegal. You can deny service to pretty much anyone for any reason. There might be a civil action and state laws to complicate a simple answer, though.

    You cannot discriminate on the basis of race or religion.
    Getting permission to shoot on thier govenrnment property IS NOT A RIGHT. i can't march into the Pentagon and a "say I'm shooting a movie you have ot give me a permit now". I have to go through the government and get special permissions first.

    You have no legal right to be served in a restaurant. You may be refused for any reason at all. Unless that reason is because of your race or your religion. Tom Cruise is not owed the right by Germany to film on their territory, but it is unlawful for them to deny him on the basis of his religion, which they expressly did. The analogy is solid, stop attacking it already.
    Glaeal wrote: »
    *edit* And once again, since you don't seem to be getting this, Germany considers Scientology a dangerous cult and has classified it as one, which means that Scientology isn't protected by the discrimination laws.
    [/QUOTE]

    Dangerous cults are religions too, no matter how much Germany may not want it to be. So are religious-analogues, such as atheism. That Germany is wrong in its classification is part of my assertion.

    LiveWire on
  • Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Not on the basis of the actor's religion. No, my analogy is perfect. You can refuse service to someone for any reason(even if its a stupid reason). However, you CANNOT BY LAW refuse service to someone because you don't like their religion. Germany cited Cruises scientology as the reason; nothing else.

    It has been stated a hundred times but you don't seem to get it.

    Here in Germany we don't recognize Scientology as a religion.

    We see them as what they are. A criminal organisation trying to disguise themselves as a religion.

    So we don't cooperate with them and keep their members of our nations federal ground.

    Just because you Americans let every lunatic do whatever the hell they want because they claim it's their 'faith' doesn't mean we have to do the same.

    Stop going all : "But it's their right!" - No. No, it isn't. Atleast not here.

    Your laws are not our laws.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Not on the basis of the actor's religion. No, my analogy is perfect. You can refuse service to someone for any reason(even if its a stupid reason). However, you CANNOT BY LAW refuse service to someone because you don't like their religion. Germany cited Cruises scientology as the reason; nothing else.

    It has been stated a hundred times but you don't seem to get it.

    Here in Germany we don't recognize Scientology as a religion.

    We see them as what they are. A criminal organisation trying to disguise themselves as a religion.

    So we don't cooperate with them and keep their members of our nations federal ground.

    Just because you Americans let every lunatic do whatever the hell they want because they claim it's their 'faith' doesn't mean we have to do the same.

    Stop going all : "But it's their right!" - No. No, it isn't. Atleast not here.

    Your laws are not our laws.

    Preacher on
    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I get that Scientology is not a recognized religion in Germany, you don't have to keep bringing it up as if its a new point your making. A huge part of my argument since about page 5 in this thread has been that Germany is WRONG in its classification.

    That the Church of Scientology has ridiculous teachings, makes a lot of money and is subverting governments isn't a unique characteristic that makes Scientology not a religion. Actually, its its defining similarity.

    We both have laws that protect against the discrimination of religion. If we can agree that Scientology is a religion albiet slightly stupider than average, we must agree that Germany is wrong to deny Tom Cruise access to the movie set on the basis of his religion.

    edit: Its members believe, really, truely, believe that Scientology is true. It has no evidence to support it, just a lot of evidence to contradict it. They believe it anyway. Therefore, religion.

    LiveWire on
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Well if you believe Scientology and their criminal practices should be protected under the tenant that in your viewpoint they are no different then other religions; I really have nothing further to argue. Your flat out refusal to see Germany's ability to declare an organization not only an invalid religion, but also one that subscribes to dangerous ideals and practices, and then to deny an actor the ability to have a set on their federal property because of his current standing in said organization means there just isn't anything to argue here. Your opinion will not change, nor will mine, and for that matter nor will Germanys.

    Preacher on
    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    We both have laws that protect against the discrimination of religion. If we can agree that Scientology is a religion albiet slightly stupider than average, we must agree that Germany is wrong to deny Tom Cruise access to the movie set on the basis of his religion.

    We don't agree that they're slightly "stupider" than average. They lie to their members, use technology that has no proven effect to convince them that they have problems, award them monetarily for bringing in new members, encourage the members to sever contacts with anyone in their life who does not support Scientology, and have been connected, and members charged, with bribery, blackmail, and even murder. It's a religion started by a man who was convicted of fraud, who fled prosecution in a boat crewed by half naked children, and who publicly admitted on more than one occasion that he wanted to start a religion just to make money.

    They aren't just silly Christians. They're dangerous and subversive, and Germany recognizes this.

    And in spite of what personal hang-ups you might have, Germany is well within their rights to deny cult members access to their facilities. If their classification of Scientology was overturned, then you might have a valid point, but it's still not America, and their rules are not the same.

    Glaeal on
  • Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    Yeah, that is the whole point.
    Just because somebody claims something to be faith doesn't automatically make it so.

    We don't have complete religious neutrality.

    And, for the sake of the argument, even if it was recognized as one it would still be a highly dangerous one.

    Nobody cares about how stupid Scientology is. You could worship a bucket of dog drool.
    The government wouldn't give a fuck and protect your right to do so.

    But if your group is known to brainwash people, commit crimes of various nature and tried to infiltrate the government than your members are kept off security sensitive federal ground.

    And if you call that discrimination - Tough shit, I guess we discriminate Scientology than.

    National and public security interests outweight 'religious' freedoms.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Do you two even know what a religion is? As long as people believe that it is true, it is a religion. The fact that it is subversive, has teachings that make no sense, makes a lot of money, is dangerous, and wields political and social power is does NOT make it unique. It makes it ever more similar to the modern accepted religions.

    I think you are going a step too far calling the Church of Scientology organized crime, at least in a legal sense. You cannot say for the Church of Scientology anything that a modern religion hasn't already done twice.

    Run Run: Discrimination by religion sounds just great until you consider that it can be used against you. As an atheist living in the reddest state in the union and the second most Mormon, if my local government had the power to screw me, they would in a second.

    LiveWire on
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Do you two even know what a religion is? As long as people believe that it is true, it is a religion. The fact that it is subversive, has teachings that make no sense, makes a lot of money, is dangerous, and wields political and social power is does NOT make it unique. It makes it ever more similar to the modern accepted religions.

    I think you are going a step too far calling the Church of Scientology organized crime, at least in a legal sense. You cannot say for the Church of Scientology anything that a modern religion hasn't already done twice.

    Ok. Scientology is a religion. Yay.

    They're also a cult, which strips them of the rights that may or may not be guaranteed to religions in Germany.

    Glaeal on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Glaeal wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Do you two even know what a religion is? As long as people believe that it is true, it is a religion. The fact that it is subversive, has teachings that make no sense, makes a lot of money, is dangerous, and wields political and social power is does NOT make it unique. It makes it ever more similar to the modern accepted religions.

    I think you are going a step too far calling the Church of Scientology organized crime, at least in a legal sense. You cannot say for the Church of Scientology anything that a modern religion hasn't already done twice.

    Ok. Scientology is a religion. Yay.

    They're also a cult, which strips them of the rights that may or may not be guaranteed to religions in Germany.

    There is no appreciable difference between "cult" and "religion". Cult is just a word for religion that hasn't fully mainstreamed yet. Christianity was a cult once.

    LiveWire on
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    There is no appreciable difference between "cult" and "religion". Cult is just a word for religion that hasn't fully mainstreamed yet. Christianity was a cult once.

    There's a legal distinction in Germany, which is what we're talking about.

    Glaeal on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Glaeal wrote: »
    LiveWire wrote: »
    There is no appreciable difference between "cult" and "religion". Cult is just a word for religion that hasn't fully mainstreamed yet. Christianity was a cult once.

    There's a legal distinction in Germany, which is what we're talking about.

    If there is a legal distinction between "cult" and "religion" in Germany, this is the first time anyone has said it in certain terms. Before it was just all "Germany recognizes Scientology as a corporation", which is NOT the same thing.

    LiveWire on
  • AzioAzio Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    There is a legal distinction between "religion" and "not religion" in Germany (and, for that matter, most other countries). Scientology quite deservedly falls in the "not religion" category, and is not a religion in the eyes of German law. Therefore it is not extended the legal protections enjoyed by actual religions. This is not a particularly intricate concept. If you still need further explanation I think you should get your fucking head examined.

    Azio on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Azio wrote: »
    There is a legal distinction between "religion" and "not religion" in Germany (and, for that matter, most other countries), and Scientology falls squarely in the "not religion" category. Therefore it is not a religion in the eyes of German law. Therefore it is not extended the legal protections enjoyed by actual religions. This is not a particularly intricate concept. If you still need further explanation I think you should get your fucking head examined.

    I understand that Germany does not recognize Scientology as a religion, but how the FUCK do they justify that. It has everything needed to classify it so, including millions of people who believe it completely. It even has all the subtle earmarks such as profitability, corruption, governmental subversion and outlandish teachings easily falsifiable by basic science.

    LiveWire on
  • Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Run Run: Discrimination by religion sounds just great until you consider that it can be used against you. As an atheist living in the reddest state in the union and the second most Mormon, if my local government had the power to screw me, they would in a second.

    I'm an atheist too. Hi5 :D

    You are a bit on slippery slope here.

    Tom Cruise is not denied any rights at all. He is not persecuted.
    Nobody is harrassing him or trying to stop him from practicing his 'faith' in any way.

    He can still film the movie on public ground.

    He is simply not allowed to do so on government owned facilities. Which is a privilige - not a right.
    The government can deny that privilige for whatever reason they feel like.
    No matter if Scientology is a religion - it is deemed dangerous and that is justification enough.

    He is not entitled to any government assistance at all. Just like nobody else is.


    Christianity may have been a cult once too. But no christian group has tried to spy on us within the ... well none ever has.

    And that is the distinction.

    Your group sticks to the civil laws and doesn't pose a threat? - Come on in.

    Your group shows hostility towards our nation? - Fuck off.

    Name one reason why we should cater to those that don't recognize the free democratic order?

    We don't do that for nazis, we don't do it for communists and we don't do it for Scientology jsut because they say : 'but it's our faith'.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    I understand that Germany does not recognize Scientology as a religion, but how the FUCK do they justify that.

    Scientology is not a bona fide organisation and does not act in the public's interrests but just tries to further it's own wealth with shady methods.
    The 'faith' is an easy to see through disguise.

    Germany's highest court refused to be fooled by them.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    So Scientology isn't a religion because it is highly profitable? I don't get the distinction here.

    I also don't believe that "faith" is just a disguise Scientologists wear like a coat to protect themselves (and to protect themselves from what, I wonder? If its illegal, religious protecting laws won't protect them). No, they actually believe it those things, sorry to say.

    LiveWire on
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    So Scientology isn't a religion because it is highly profitable? I don't get the distinction here.

    I also don't believe that "faith" is just a disguise Scientologists wear like a coat to protect themselves (and to protect themselves from what, I wonder? If its illegal, religious protecting laws won't protect them). No, they actually believe it those things, sorry to say.

    They lie to their members, use technology that has no proven effect to convince them that they have problems, award them monetarily for bringing in new members, encourage the members to sever contacts with anyone in their life who does not support Scientology, and have been connected, and members charged, with bribery, blackmail, and even murder. It's a religion started by a man who was convicted of fraud, who fled prosecution in a boat crewed by half naked children, and who publicly admitted on more than one occasion that he wanted to start a religion just to make money.

    You'll notice I said that a while ago, and many others have said similar things many times in this thread.

    Glaeal on
  • AdrienAdrien Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    So Scientology isn't a religion because it is highly profitable? I don't get the distinction here.

    I also don't believe that "faith" is just a disguise Scientologists wear like a coat to protect themselves (and to protect themselves from what, I wonder? If its illegal, religious protecting laws won't protect them). No, they actually believe it those things, sorry to say.

    This is going great places.

    You're getting hung up on the word "cult" and missing the word "dangerous". No one cares if your jihadist group is a religion or not, because either way you're still fucking terrorists.

    Adrien on
    tmkm.jpg
  • Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    So Scientology isn't a religion because it is highly profitable? I don't get the distinction here.

    I also don't believe that "faith" is just a disguise Scientologists wear like a coat to protect themselves (and to protect themselves from what, I wonder? If its illegal, religious protecting laws won't protect them). No, they actually believe it those things, sorry to say.

    Even if you may not like it, that is the way it works here.

    As I said before, we don't have complete religious neutrality.
    Just saying you are a religion does not automatically make you one here.

    You have to prove that you are working in the peoples interrest.
    If you do so you are considered a religion by German law with all its benefits like tax examptions.

    If you don't you are at best considered a cult.

    That does not mean you are denied from practicing your faith. You just don't get any extra priviliges.
    Adrien wrote: »
    No one cares if your jihadist group is a religion or not, because either way you're still fucking terrorists.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • HaphazardHaphazard Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Yes, Scientology is not a religion as discribed in article 4 of the Basic Constitutional Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.

    Edit: Becasue I'm ever curious, can someone tell me what passes as a religious organisation in the US?

    Haphazard on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    If you can demonstrate that Scientologists are even remotely as threatening as Jihadist terrorists, then I will gladly alter my opinion.

    edit: If you can even demonstrate that the Church of Scientology is firstly a criminal organization we will have gotten somewhere we haven't.

    LiveWire on
  • HaphazardHaphazard Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    If you can demonstrate that Scientologists are even remotely as threatening as Jihadist terrorists, then I will gladly alter my opinion.

    edit: If you can even demonstrate that the Church of Scientology is firstly a criminal organization we will have gotten somewhere we haven't.

    It's always on the verge of being declared as a criminal organisation here. I think there were already enough examples given, as for the why.

    Haphazard on
  • Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    Haphazard wrote: »
    Yes, Scientology is not a religion as discribed in article 4 of the Basic Constitutional Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.

    Edit: Becasue I'm ever curious, can someone tell me what passes as a religious organisation in the US?

    Sadly, pretty much anything.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • HaphazardHaphazard Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Haphazard wrote: »
    Yes, Scientology is not a religion as discribed in article 4 of the Basic Constitutional Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.

    Edit: Becasue I'm ever curious, can someone tell me what passes as a religious organisation in the US?

    Sadly, pretty much anything.

    Well, I know that the US government actively cooses who gets tax cuts and who doesn't.

    Haphazard on
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Yeah look up anything about the CoS's vocal detractors and you can see a major difference between any other religion in the US and CoS. Last I checked when you say you hate catholics they don't call you a child molester and plaster flyers about it.

    Preacher on
    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • GlaealGlaeal Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    If you can demonstrate that Scientologists are even remotely as threatening as Jihadist terrorists, then I will gladly alter my opinion.

    edit: If you can even demonstrate that the Church of Scientology is firstly a criminal organization we will have gotten somewhere we haven't.

    Operation Snow White was the Church of Scientology's name for a project during the 1970s to purge unfavorable records about Scientology and its founder L. Ron Hubbard. This project included a series of infiltrations and thefts from government agencies, carried out by Church members, including the single largest infiltration of the United States government in history
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Snow_White -Sourced
    Wikipedia wrote:
    • During the 1960s, Scientology was accused by the United States government of engaging in medical fraud by claiming that the E-meter would treat and cure physical ailments and diseases. A 1971 ruling of the United States District Court, District of Columbia (333 F. Supp. 357), specifically stated, "the E-meter has no proven usefulness in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease, nor is it medically or scientifically capable of improving any bodily function." As a result of this ruling, Scientology now publishes disclaimers in its books and publications declaring that "by itself, the E-meter does nothing" and that it is used specifically for spiritual purposes.
    • In 1978, L. Ron Hubbard was convicted in absentia by French authorities of engaging in fraud, fined 35,000 French Francs and sentenced to four years in prison. The head of the French Church of Scientology was convicted at the same trial and given a suspended one-year prison sentence.
    • The FBI raid on the Church's headquarters revealed documentation that detailed Scientology actions against various critics of the organization. Among these documents was a plan to frame Gabe Cazares, the mayor of the city of Clearwater, Florida, with a staged hit-and-run accident; plans to discredit the skeptical organization CSICOP by spreading rumors that it was a front for the CIA; and a project called "Operation Freakout", aimed at ruining the life of author Paulette Cooper, author of an early book critical of the movement, The Scandal of Scientology.
    • In 1988 the government of Spain arrested Scientology president Heber Jentzsch and ten other members of the organization on various charges, including "illicit association," coercion, fraud, and labor law violations. Jentzsch jumped bail, leaving Spain and returning to the United States after Scientology paid a bail bond of approximately $1 million, and he has not returned to the country since. Scientology fought the charges in court for fourteen years, until the case was finally dismissed in 2002.
    • The Church of Scientology is the only religious organization in Canada to be convicted on the charge of breaching the public trust: The Queen v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, et al](1992)
    • In France, several officials of the Church of Scientology have been convicted of crimes such as embezzlement. The Church was listed as a "dangerous cult" in a parliamentary report.
    • The Church of Scientology long considered the Cult Awareness Network (CAN) as one of its most important enemies, and many Scientology publications during the 1980s and 1990s cast CAN (and its spokesperson at the time, Cynthia Kisser) in an unfriendly light, accusing the cult-watchdog organization of various criminal activities. After CAN was forced into bankruptcy and taken over by Scientologists in the late 1990s, Scientology proudly proclaimed this as one of its greatest victories.
    • In Belgium, after a judicial investigation since 1997, a trial against the organisation is due to begin in 2006. Charges include formation of a criminal organisation, the unlawful exercise of medicine, and fraud.
    • In the United Kingdom the church has been accused of "grooming" City of Londonpolice officers with gifts worth thousands of pounds.
    • In Australia, Scientology has been banned at various times in three out of six states; the use of the E-meter was simliarly banned in Victoria. In Victoria, Scientology was investigated by the state Government. In the conclusion to his report written as part of this investigation, Kevin Victor Anderson, Q.C. stated "Scientology is a delusional belief system, based on fiction and fallacies and propagated by falsehood and deception".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_controversy

    Glaeal on
  • Run Run RunRun Run Run __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    If you can demonstrate that Scientologists are even remotely as threatening as Jihadist terrorists, then I will gladly alter my opinion.

    Why would you alter your opinion? That was not the point you were arguing.

    You claimed that any group of people that shared a spiritual believe should be considered a religion.

    In Germany that simply is not the case. Here groups of faith have to fullfill certain criteria before they are granted priviliges.

    It is a cultural difference. We simply reserve the right to judge groups of faith and make distinctions.

    I mean I am an atheist like you. For me all religions are bullshit. Still they aren't 'ohlol all the same'.

    And btw, the religious rights of the jihadists are actually protected in Germany, because the Islam is.
    The jihadists are only a small splinter group of the whole, while Scientology in itself is corrupted up the highest levels.

    edit: I think this argument will go nowhere.

    Fact is : here there is a legal difference between a religion and a cult.
    You think they all should be treated the same no matter what - the German government doesn't.
    Their justification is the amount the group benefits the general good.

    Run Run Run on
    kissing.jpg
  • geckahngeckahn Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Theres a legal difference between a cult and a religion in America too, but ever since the IRS gave up trying to collect from the Church of Scientology it hasnt really mattered.

    geckahn on
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    This is a group that has tried to claim it's "Fair Game" policy, which authorizes Church members to intimidate, harass and "destroy", ciritcs to be a "core belief" of thier faith in order to defend themsevles in court.

    How is that any different from the Aryan Nation claiming God told them to beat up black people? Should that be protected religious rights too?

    Is that a slippery slope anyone really wants to go down?

    nexuscrawler on
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    This is a group that has tried to claim it's "Fair Game" policy, which authorizes Church members to intimidate, harass and "destroy", ciritcs to be a "core belief" of thier faith in order to defend themsevles in court.

    How is that any different from the Aryan Nation claiming God told them to beat up black people? Should that be protected religious rights too?

    Is that a slippery slope anyone really wants to go down?
    The Aryan Nation isn't trying to become a legitimate religion in the eyes of the general public. Scientology, on the other hand, is. It's not really much of a slippery slope.

    Now, if practitioners of Islam were coming out and saying that suicide bombing was a core tennet of their faith, and should be protected as such, then I think you'd have a case.

    Hacksaw on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Your religious beliefs will not help you in court if you have broken a law. Stop arguing that line. Thats not what the laws of religious protection have ever meant.

    LiveWire on
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    LiveWire wrote: »
    Your religious beliefs will not help you in court if you have broken a law. Stop arguing that line. Thats not what the laws of religious protection have ever meant.
    Scientology is also a pyramid scheme. I don't think criminal enterprises of a financial nature should be awarded tax exempt status. That just strikes me as being anathema to the whole nature of our legal system.

    Hacksaw on
Sign In or Register to comment.