The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

M&T Bank stopped fucking me over, yay! (RESOLVED)

DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
edited July 2007 in Help / Advice Forum
EDIT: RESOLVED. See page 2

Okay. So, for a host of reasons, I decided to move my money out of M&T Bank (which I started using because it was the "official campus bank" for my college or some such) and into SEFCU, a local credit union.

So yesterday, I went down to the bank and told them that I was closing my account. The teller made me a cashier's check for the balance of my savings and then told me that I'd used my check card recently and had two pending transactions on my checking: two trips to Price Chopper (supermarket) totaling to $17 or so combined. I told her to leave enough money in the checking to cover pending check card transactions. I then remembered that I'd put $20 worth of gas in my car at the Mobil down the street the other day and paid with my card, so I asked if there were any pending transactions from ExxonMobil on there. She told me that the Price Chopper stuff were the only ones, so I figured that the ExxonMobil stuff must have already cleared, since it happened like last week. I take all this money and bring it over to SEFCU and deposit it.

So, on a worried hunch, I check the M&T Web Banking thing today and sure enough, my current balance is at -$20, and there was the ExxonMobil withdrawal.

So I immediately throw on my shoes and rush out the door and drive into town (I'm lucky I didn't get a speeding ticket, in hindsight) and withdrawal $20 from SEFCU and bring it to M&T and manage to deposit it just before close of business today (which is at 3:00, apparently). I am then told that I'll still get overdraft fees for my negative balance. This is aggravating but understandable, I guess.

They then tell me that I will in fact get three overdraft fees, one for the Mobil stop and one each for the Price Chopper stuff, since their policy is to put the $17 I'd left in my account to cover the Price Chopper bills towards the $20 gas stop. So I'm out $35x3, or $105, not just $35. I then get very upset and explain that even if the gas bill (from last week, mind you) somehow came in in the middle of the night, I still specifically told the teller to leave money in the account to cover the Price Chopper charges. One overdraft fee would be understandable, but three is obscene. Not only did the largest withdrawal not show up yesterday, but I had the money for the other two already in the account, and I brought the $20 as soon as I could see the charges. They give me the old "there's nothing we can do, blah blah blah" and I leave, since they're closing.

I don't make a whole hell of a lot of money here, and $105 is a serious chunk of a paycheck. Do I have any recourse? The overdraft fees haven't yet shown up on my online statement, but I'm guessing that when they show, if I just don't pay them they'll rape my credit rating or something. But this is seriously unfair; I'm getting the impression that they're trying to clip as much money as they can since I'm moving to a different bank. Is there anything I can do here? I don't think going back to the branch and pleading my case is going to help; they don't seem to give a damn once they found I was closing my account.

Daedalus on
«1

Posts

  • saggiosaggio Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    See if you can talk to the bank manager. If he still gives you the run-around, go to your local Better Business Bureau and file a complaint there. That might be enough to get your money back.

    saggio on
    3DS: 0232-9436-6893
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    They're fucking you over because they can. It's their policy to process things in such a way so that they get to charge you the maximum possible overdraft fees. You should go back in, be polite, and explain to them, politely, that the overdraft fees are their fault, and you'd like them erased. If the teller can't help you, ask politely to speak with their supervisor.

    You're cancelling your account, so you may be screwed, but this is the best way to go about getting the charges reversed.

    Thanatos on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    saggio wrote: »
    See if you can talk to the bank manager. If he still gives you the run-around, go to your local Better Business Bureau and file a complaint there. That might be enough to get your money back.

    I'm fairly certain that the branch manager may have been the one who closed my account for me yesterday. If not, there's still only six people who work at that branch and they all saw me kinda flip out and yell at people today when I was told the bad news.

    BBB might be a good idea, though. I'll look into that.

    Daedalus on
  • RoundBoyRoundBoy Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Well.. take a step back... you did leave a valid amount for 2 debits, but you have a valid 3rd debit that was not their fault they did not see... thats how gas stations work. They do a $1 and then the real charge at some point.

    To split hairs... you are responsible for ONE of the overdrafts, as it was your fault. They are just being assholes for the other two.

    you don't have much wiggle room on the single od charge getting reversed, as you already closed the account.

    RoundBoy on
    sig_civwar.jpg
    Librarians harbor a terrible secret. Find it.
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    RoundBoy wrote: »
    Well.. take a step back... you did leave a valid amount for 2 debits, but you have a valid 3rd debit that was not their fault they did not see... thats how gas stations work. They do a $1 and then the real charge at some point.

    To split hairs... you are responsible for ONE of the overdrafts, as it was your fault. They are just being assholes for the other two.

    you don't have much wiggle room on the single od charge getting reversed, as you already closed the account.

    Oh, I know. Like I said, one overdraft (even though I brought the $20 down as soon as I saw the charge) would be understandable, if aggravating. But billing me for all three seems like it would border on bank fraud in any sane legal system (which I may not necessarily be in).

    Daedalus on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    RoundBoy wrote: »
    Well.. take a step back... you did leave a valid amount for 2 debits, but you have a valid 3rd debit that was not their fault they did not see... thats how gas stations work. They do a $1 and then the real charge at some point.

    To split hairs... you are responsible for ONE of the overdrafts, as it was your fault. They are just being assholes for the other two.

    you don't have much wiggle room on the single od charge getting reversed, as you already closed the account.
    Oh, I know. Like I said, one overdraft (even though I brought the $20 down as soon as I saw the charge) would be understandable, if aggravating. But billing me for all three seems like it would border on bank fraud in any sane legal system (which I may not necessarily be in).
    No, fuck that. You made a good-faith effort to ensure that your outstanding debts were covered, they decided to fuck you over but good, and hit you with three overdraft fees when, at best one was necessary. Go in, ask to speak to the manager. Apologize for getting pissy. Explain, in a calm, polite manner why you were so upset yesterday. Explain that you made said good-faith effort (asking about outstanding charges, even going so far as to double-check on the gas purchase) to prevent from overdrafting your account, and that you feel it is unfair to you for to pay any sort of overdraft fee (use "I" language, here). Tell them that you'll be more than happy to pay down the balance of the principle. If they still insist on you paying any sort of overdraft fee, while remaining calm and polite, you can try saying that you'll be telling everyone you know in town to never bank there again (banks hate bad word-of-mouth; it's incredibly bad for business).

    These are bullshit charges, and there is no reason for you to pay them, and there's really no reason for you to go in starting from the position of "well, I suppose this one fee is fair." No, it's not. It's bullshit.

    Thanatos on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Anyway, I'm going to wait for the overdraft fees to show up on web banking, since right now it's just at $0, and it's entirely possible that the people at the branch were (deliberately or accidentally) wrong and I actually got the $20 in there in time yesterday.

    At least, I can hope.

    Now to wait for the other shoe to drop.

    Daedalus on
  • RoundBoyRoundBoy Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    How is it not his responsibility? When the teller looks at pending debts, she can only see what actually has come though the system. The OP forgot he had an additional $20 debit pending.. Its really no different then forgetting to balance your checkbook by $20 ..

    I *do* agree that its bullshit you are paying all those overdraft fees though... My only point was that logically you can get out of 2 of them.. but by what logic can you absolve yourself of the third one? You agreed to such terms when you got the account...

    Personally.. i would try and get them all waived , since you did make a good faith effort to get money in the account to cover... and it took a long time for the debit to show.. all I'm saying is that they are fully within rights to get you for the overdrat on the $20.

    RoundBoy on
    sig_civwar.jpg
    Librarians harbor a terrible secret. Find it.
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I would say you definitely should get out of two of them - and try to convince them that you should be out of the 3rd - after all, you did deposit the $20 on the same day. You made an effort to leave enough money to cover all your debits, and deposited money as soon as you noticed a problem. In hindsight though, you probably should have asked the teller if the exxonmobil charge had cleared already. It is clear in the way they're jiggering things that they're trying to get you for all they can.

    On a side note, anyone else remember hearing about some kind of rules where banks can only charge you fees that actually cover the costs of the overdraft/whatever? Cause I guarantee it didn't cost them $35 extra to cover a $20 overdraft.

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    RoundBoy wrote: »
    How is it not his responsibility? When the teller looks at pending debts, she can only see what actually has come though the system. The OP forgot he had an additional $20 debit pending.. Its really no different then forgetting to balance your checkbook by $20 ..

    I *do* agree that its bullshit you are paying all those overdraft fees though... My only point was that logically you can get out of 2 of them.. but by what logic can you absolve yourself of the third one? You agreed to such terms when you got the account...

    Personally.. i would try and get them all waived , since you did make a good faith effort to get money in the account to cover... and it took a long time for the debit to show.. all I'm saying is that they are fully within rights to get you for the overdrat on the $20.
    If it were just the $20 they were trying to get him for, I'd agree.

    However, they're trying to fuck him over for no other reason than because they can, so they don't deserve one goddamn cent.

    Thanatos on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    So, the $96 worth of overdraft charges came through, and I called the bank, and the teller that I closed the account with gave me the whole "this is not a bank error and we will not be reversing these charges". Ditto her supervisor. I think I'm going to elevate this to the New York BBB. Any advice?

    Daedalus on
  • RoundBoyRoundBoy Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I'm not certian you have a legal recourse for any of this. The only real ground you have to stand on at this point is that 2 charges were a direct result of the first charge...

    if you can't get the bank to waive a fee to consolodate, or as a first time this happened, then I dunno.

    As said before, you closed your account, why would they still attempt to please you? If they won't reverse the 2nd & 3rd charge... then maybe the threat of a complaint is worth it.

    its a toss up if the BBB will do anything, because they have no sway over the bank legally... its just a group of businesses that agree to have a single complaint / resolution lookup.

    RoundBoy on
    sig_civwar.jpg
    Librarians harbor a terrible secret. Find it.
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Yeah, you closed your account, so I think they're figuring "fuck you." I would show up at the actual branch, instead of trying to do it over the phone. It's a lot easier to say "no" when you're not sitting there in front of them, sucking up their time.

    Thanatos on
  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Ok, I'm going to try to summarize this for my tiny little brain:

    So you went to the bank, and a bank employee told you that there were two transactions going through.
    So you left enough money for them.
    And then you found that the employee was wrong, and therefore had given you the wrong information.
    And now the bank is trying to charge you for the employees mistake?

    On the one hand, I'm sure that they have some system to keep that legal on their side.

    On the other, I'm sure that it is a very fuzzy system to keep that legal.

    At the very least, I doubt they want the negative publicity that could be brought against them, because then they'd most likely have to change their policy regarding similar cases, or lose even more business, which would end up costing them not only customers, but also money from the cases like this where the bilked person won't stand up to them.

    Khavall on
  • RoundBoyRoundBoy Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Its not the employee's mistake if the charge wasn't posted to his account. Gas stations are notorious for this, simply due to the nature of the transaction.

    When you buy gas, the station charges $1 or so to your card, to make sure its valid. They *might* put a hold on a block of $50 or so as a potential future charge (this is removed right away)

    At some point after you are done, the system gets around to charging you for the actual amount used at the pump. it could be a day, it could be a week or more.

    A really savy teller might have looked at your transaction history and saw a $1 gas charge, but no followup charge, and reminded you of this fact... but from the OP description, these people are not at the top of the banking skillset.

    RoundBoy on
    sig_civwar.jpg
    Librarians harbor a terrible secret. Find it.
  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    RoundBoy wrote: »
    Its not the employee's mistake if the charge wasn't posted to his account. Gas stations are notorious for this, simply due to the nature of the transaction.

    When you buy gas, the station charges $1 or so to your card, to make sure its valid. They *might* put a hold on a block of $50 or so as a potential future charge (this is removed right away)

    At some point after you are done, the system gets around to charging you for the actual amount used at the pump. it could be a day, it could be a week or more.

    A really savy teller might have looked at your transaction history and saw a $1 gas charge, but no followup charge, and reminded you of this fact... but from the OP description, these people are not at the top of the banking skillset.

    It's also not exactly his mistake if the charge wasn't posted to the account.

    And the problem isn't even that he's paying for the gas overcharge. The problem is that they drew from the $17 he specifically told the employee to leave in the account to cover the other charges to pay for the gas, but since it wasn't enough, they charged him for that overcharge, and then the two other charges which the $17 was there to cover.

    Khavall on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Khavall wrote: »
    Ok, I'm going to try to summarize this for my tiny little brain:

    So you went to the bank, and a bank employee told you that there were two transactions going through.
    So you left enough money for them.
    And then you found that the employee was wrong, and therefore had given you the wrong information.
    And now the bank is trying to charge you for the employees mistake?

    On the one hand, I'm sure that they have some system to keep that legal on their side.

    On the other, I'm sure that it is a very fuzzy system to keep that legal.

    At the very least, I doubt they want the negative publicity that could be brought against them, because then they'd most likely have to change their policy regarding similar cases, or lose even more business, which would end up costing them not only customers, but also money from the cases like this where the bilked person won't stand up to them.
    Technically, it's his responsibility to keep track of the money in his account. They deliberately exacerbated this by processing the largest charge first, so they could hit him with 3 overdraft charges instead of just 1. It is, unfortunately, totally legal, mostly because Congress is in the pocket of the banking/credit industry.

    Thanatos on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    So I filled out a well-worded BBB complaint, and now I'm guessing that absolutely nothing is going to happen, and I'll end up either giving up and giving them the hundred dollars they're stealing from me, or getting a collections agency sent on my ass and shitting on my credit rating.

    Still, I'll give it a few days to be sure.

    Daedalus on
  • SerphimeraSerphimera Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I'm wondering...and this is just an idle thought here...what would happen if the OP never paid off said charges. Is $100 really enough for the bank to go after him? Essentially, if they were to sell his debt to an agency that collects on them, would the agency be able to make a profit? Also, how bad could it mess up his credit rating, if at all?

    I'm not suggesting anything here, mostly I'm just curious.

    Serphimera on
    And then I voted.
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2007
    Serphimera wrote: »
    Is $100 really enough for the bank to go after him? Essentially, if they were to sell his debt to an agency that collects on them, would the agency be able to make a profit? Also, how bad could it mess up his credit rating, if at all?

    Yes, yes, and quite a bit, until he paid it off.

    Doc on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Serphimera wrote: »
    I'm wondering...and this is just an idle thought here...what would happen if the OP never paid off said charges. Is $100 really enough for the bank to go after him? Essentially, if they were to sell his debt to an agency that collects on them, would the agency be able to make a profit? Also, how bad could it mess up his credit rating, if at all?

    I'm not suggesting anything here, mostly I'm just curious.

    I'm almost certain that it would fuck up my credit rating; I've heard of people who've had overdue movie rentals that have fucked up their credit ratings.

    I do believe that credit agencies just buy the debt off of M&T for less than the actual amount. This would mean M&T would "lose" money, except that I only owe them money in the first place because they said so; it's not as if I got anything out of it. So it's more like my bank and a collections agency gang-fucking me.

    I wonder how long I have?

    Daedalus on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Serphimera wrote: »
    I'm wondering...and this is just an idle thought here...what would happen if the OP never paid off said charges. Is $100 really enough for the bank to go after him? Essentially, if they were to sell his debt to an agency that collects on them, would the agency be able to make a profit? Also, how bad could it mess up his credit rating, if at all?

    I'm not suggesting anything here, mostly I'm just curious.
    Basically, the whole system is weighted as much as humanly possible towards the banks and credit card agencies.

    Thanatos on
  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Serphimera wrote: »
    I'm wondering...and this is just an idle thought here...what would happen if the OP never paid off said charges. Is $100 really enough for the bank to go after him? Essentially, if they were to sell his debt to an agency that collects on them, would the agency be able to make a profit? Also, how bad could it mess up his credit rating, if at all?

    I'm not suggesting anything here, mostly I'm just curious.

    I'm almost certain that it would fuck up my credit rating; I've heard of people who've had overdue movie rentals that have fucked up their credit ratings.

    I do believe that credit agencies just buy the debt off of M&T for less than the actual amount. This would mean M&T would "lose" money, except that I only owe them money in the first place because they said so; it's not as if I got anything out of it. So it's more like my bank and a collections agency gang-fucking me.

    I wonder how long I have?

    As a reference, when I was fighting a bullshit claim from Blockbuster, their collection against me reduced my FICO score by 2 points. Sure, it's a reduction, but it wouldn't have made any considerable difference in any loan I tried to take out.

    As for the rest, there's a good reason to go to the bank and say "I will not pay any of these overdraft charges" instead of "one of these is fair." It is far more likely that they will attempt to work you over... moving you from zero to one, is more favorable than moving you from one to three.

    Shadowfire on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Serphimera wrote: »
    I'm wondering...and this is just an idle thought here...what would happen if the OP never paid off said charges. Is $100 really enough for the bank to go after him? Essentially, if they were to sell his debt to an agency that collects on them, would the agency be able to make a profit? Also, how bad could it mess up his credit rating, if at all?

    I'm not suggesting anything here, mostly I'm just curious.

    I'm almost certain that it would fuck up my credit rating; I've heard of people who've had overdue movie rentals that have fucked up their credit ratings.

    I do believe that credit agencies just buy the debt off of M&T for less than the actual amount. This would mean M&T would "lose" money, except that I only owe them money in the first place because they said so; it's not as if I got anything out of it. So it's more like my bank and a collections agency gang-fucking me.

    I wonder how long I have?
    As a reference, when I was fighting a bullshit claim from Blockbuster, their collection against me reduced my FICO score by 2 points. Sure, it's a reduction, but it wouldn't have made any considerable difference in any loan I tried to take out.

    As for the rest, there's a good reason to go to the bank and say "I will not pay any of these overdraft charges" instead of "one of these is fair." It is far more likely that they will attempt to work you over... moving you from zero to one, is more favorable than moving you from one to three.
    Your FICO score is not the end-all and be-all of your credit. If you had tried to get a car or home loan, they would have said "you have an outstanding debt, we're not loaning you shit until you get it taken care of."

    Thanatos on
  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Serphimera wrote: »
    I'm wondering...and this is just an idle thought here...what would happen if the OP never paid off said charges. Is $100 really enough for the bank to go after him? Essentially, if they were to sell his debt to an agency that collects on them, would the agency be able to make a profit? Also, how bad could it mess up his credit rating, if at all?

    I'm not suggesting anything here, mostly I'm just curious.

    I'm almost certain that it would fuck up my credit rating; I've heard of people who've had overdue movie rentals that have fucked up their credit ratings.

    I do believe that credit agencies just buy the debt off of M&T for less than the actual amount. This would mean M&T would "lose" money, except that I only owe them money in the first place because they said so; it's not as if I got anything out of it. So it's more like my bank and a collections agency gang-fucking me.

    I wonder how long I have?
    As a reference, when I was fighting a bullshit claim from Blockbuster, their collection against me reduced my FICO score by 2 points. Sure, it's a reduction, but it wouldn't have made any considerable difference in any loan I tried to take out.

    As for the rest, there's a good reason to go to the bank and say "I will not pay any of these overdraft charges" instead of "one of these is fair." It is far more likely that they will attempt to work you over... moving you from zero to one, is more favorable than moving you from one to three.
    Your FICO score is not the end-all and be-all of your credit. If you had tried to get a car or home loan, they would have said "you have an outstanding debt, we're not loaning you shit until you get it taken care of."

    Actually, I got the loan just fine. It wasn't until after the car was purchased that the issue was taken care of (Blockbuster finally admitted fault and removed the mark on my credit). My interest rate was not effected because of it either. It really comes down to what the problem is exactly, and who the issue is through. Debts are debts, but who they're through can make a difference... i.e. student loans, and medical bills tend to have less of an effect than a credit card that hasn't been paid in 3 months. :P

    Shadowfire on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Serphimera wrote: »
    I'm wondering...and this is just an idle thought here...what would happen if the OP never paid off said charges. Is $100 really enough for the bank to go after him? Essentially, if they were to sell his debt to an agency that collects on them, would the agency be able to make a profit? Also, how bad could it mess up his credit rating, if at all?

    I'm not suggesting anything here, mostly I'm just curious.

    I'm almost certain that it would fuck up my credit rating; I've heard of people who've had overdue movie rentals that have fucked up their credit ratings.

    I do believe that credit agencies just buy the debt off of M&T for less than the actual amount. This would mean M&T would "lose" money, except that I only owe them money in the first place because they said so; it's not as if I got anything out of it. So it's more like my bank and a collections agency gang-fucking me.

    I wonder how long I have?
    As a reference, when I was fighting a bullshit claim from Blockbuster, their collection against me reduced my FICO score by 2 points. Sure, it's a reduction, but it wouldn't have made any considerable difference in any loan I tried to take out.

    As for the rest, there's a good reason to go to the bank and say "I will not pay any of these overdraft charges" instead of "one of these is fair." It is far more likely that they will attempt to work you over... moving you from zero to one, is more favorable than moving you from one to three.
    Your FICO score is not the end-all and be-all of your credit. If you had tried to get a car or home loan, they would have said "you have an outstanding debt, we're not loaning you shit until you get it taken care of."

    Actually, I got the loan just fine. It wasn't until after the car was purchased that the issue was taken care of (Blockbuster finally admitted fault and removed the mark on my credit). My interest rate was not effected because of it either. It really comes down to what the problem is exactly, and who the issue is through. Debts are debts, but who they're through can make a difference... i.e. student loans, and medical bills tend to have less of an effect than a credit card that hasn't been paid in 3 months. :P

    I've got the feeling that, to a creditor, this situation would look like "you overdrew your account for $96 and then just left it".

    And I already tried the "I will not pay any of these overdraft charges". I got a "we'll send your ass to collections". They're doing everything in their legal power to fuck with me.

    So fuck that; I'm going to start telling people not to use their bank. I figure if even one person decides to get a loan at a different bank rather than M&T because of hearing how they're fucking with me, I've cost them more money than they've cost me. Doesn't help my situation, but it sure would make me feel better.

    Daedalus on
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    fire one off to the consumerist and see if they have any advice - ive read several articles sorta concerning this recently.

    or at least search for said past article on the subject and see if they yield any tips

    Deusfaux on
  • GrimmGrimm Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Have you heard anything back from the better business bureau? Best Buy was screwing me over for about 4 and a half months on getting a laptop fixed under warranty, I called the bbb and 3 days later i get a call from best buy saying they want to replace my laptop and give me a 50$ gift card.

    Grimm on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Grimm wrote: »
    Have you heard anything back from the better business bureau? Best Buy was screwing me over for about 4 and a half months on getting a laptop fixed under warranty, I called the bbb and 3 days later i get a call from best buy saying they want to replace my laptop and give me a 50$ gift card.

    Nothing yet, and I don't think M&T is a member (it figures), so I don't have much hope. Still, I'll wait a week to see if anything comes of it.

    Somebody I talked to suggested filing a complaint with either the New York State Banking Commission or the Attorney General's office. Anyone think that either of these are a good idea?

    Daedalus on
  • locomotivemanlocomotiveman Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    I'd also consider looking into who regulates M&T. Some banks are not actually regulated by the Feds, the Five-Star banks in Western NY for example are under NY State regulation rather then Federal, and it could be that M&T is as well. A state regulating body may be a bit more understanding and take your side in this matter, unlikely but worth a shot.

    locomotiveman on
    aquabat wrote:
    I actually worked at work on Saturday. Also I went out on a date with a real life girl.


    Can you like, permanently break the forums?
  • GrimmGrimm Registered User regular
    edited June 2007
    Have you considered contacting your local news station / news paper? Making good on your threat to tell everyone you know not to do business with them on a large public scale might just scare them enough to help you out.

    Grimm on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Grimm wrote: »
    Have you considered contacting your local news station / news paper? Making good on your threat to tell everyone you know not to do business with them on a large public scale might just scare them enough to help you out.

    You know, at this point I might for the hell of it. I've pretty much mentally written off the $96, so I might as well piss them off as much as I can in the process.

    I mean, it can't hurt (me), right?

    Daedalus on
  • exisexis Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Grimm wrote: »
    Have you considered contacting your local news station / news paper? Making good on your threat to tell everyone you know not to do business with them on a large public scale might just scare them enough to help you out.

    You know, at this point I might for the hell of it. I've pretty much mentally written off the $96, so I might as well piss them off as much as I can in the process.

    I mean, it can't hurt (me), right?

    As long as you're completely honest and forthcoming there shouldn't be anything they can do about it. After all, the bank isn't arguing "it didn't happen", they're arguing "it did happen, but due to the way the system works it's your responsibility", right?

    exis on
  • PeekingDuckPeekingDuck __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Bankers are only slightly below lawyers on the fast track to hell. With that being said, you closed your account so I doubt they will give you much room to negotiate. You might just have to pay it, close it, tell them to blow you, and walk out the door. Oh and get it in writing, since they'll probably try to fuck you again. Bankers are scum.

    PeekingDuck on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    exis wrote: »
    Grimm wrote: »
    Have you considered contacting your local news station / news paper? Making good on your threat to tell everyone you know not to do business with them on a large public scale might just scare them enough to help you out.

    You know, at this point I might for the hell of it. I've pretty much mentally written off the $96, so I might as well piss them off as much as I can in the process.

    I mean, it can't hurt (me), right?

    As long as you're completely honest and forthcoming there shouldn't be anything they can do about it. After all, the bank isn't arguing "it didn't happen", they're arguing "it did happen, but due to the way the system works it's your responsibility", right?

    Yeah, that's pretty much it. I guess that's what I'll do: pay them the $96 so they don't fuck up my credit rating, write to my two local papers, then when I get back to college, I'll write to that paper, too, since M&T Bank is the "official on-campus bank" there. (Incidentally, the president of my university just happens to be on some high-paying advisory board to M&T Bank. Odd coincidence, huh?)

    Daedalus on
  • GrimmGrimm Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Let us know how things go.

    Good luck

    Grimm on
  • DrHookensteinDrHookenstein Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Just curious, did you ever go back and talk with the fellow? You mentioned having another conversation with someone from M&T off-handedly, but I wasn't sure if that was with the branch manager or with someone on the phone.

    I ask only because I've had many over-draft fees from Suntrust down here in Florida simply waived when I explained the nature of the balance confusion (in this case, a similar scenario).

    It may just be a "catch the right person on the right day" sort of thing, but if you haven't spoken with someone yet, I'd give it a shot.

    DrHookenstein on
    "He piled upon the whale's white hump the sum of all the general rage and hate felt by his whole race from Adam down; and then, as if his chest had been a mortar, he burst his hot heart's shell upon it." -Moby Dick
  • mmurch01mmurch01 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Don't know if anyone mentioned this or not, I didn't read the entire thread...

    Banks process transactions that are pending from largest to smallest. That way, they get the most money in overdraft fees. In your example, you had $17 in the bank, so, they process the $20 gas first, leaving -$3 plus -$35 = -$38 then, they process the next one (~$10) towards the -$38 balance and it becomes -$48 + -$35 and so on.

    Lawmakers haven't fixed this yet for consumers, so write your representatives and tell them you think this is BOWLshit.

    Another way banks fuck people is by immediately processing debits, but waiting however long to clear deposits. It's not because their system is slow on depositing money, for chrissakes, it's because they CAN. So people spend money on payday, thinking their check has been deposited, and end up with overdraft fees. There is a law that makes them take the money out right away, but it lets them take longer on deposits, so they do. If the law changed, they would have to change as well.

    Again, that's why I say call, write, email and etc, your representatives and make sure they know this is a hot issue. You better believe the banks are doing the same to protect their interests...it's up to us to protect OURS.

    Those fucking dillhole bankers and their lobbyists (or however you spell it)
    </rant>

    mmurch01 on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Just curious, did you ever go back and talk with the fellow? You mentioned having another conversation with someone from M&T off-handedly, but I wasn't sure if that was with the branch manager or with someone on the phone.

    I ask only because I've had many over-draft fees from Suntrust down here in Florida simply waived when I explained the nature of the balance confusion (in this case, a similar scenario).

    It may just be a "catch the right person on the right day" sort of thing, but if you haven't spoken with someone yet, I'd give it a shot.

    I talked, on the phone, to both the teller that handled my call and her supervisor. I'm sure that either of them have the authority to reverse the fees, but they refuse, probably because they 1) can, and 2) don't care about keeping me as a customer, since I told them I was leaving before this whole mess started.

    Plus they just seem mean and disagreeable, on a personal level. Or perhaps they don't like me. Whatever. In any case, I'm writing off the $96 and warning others about this sort of thing.

    Daedalus on
  • DrHookensteinDrHookenstein Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Gotcha. Just wanted to be sure you got a chance to explore that avenue.

    DrHookenstein on
    "He piled upon the whale's white hump the sum of all the general rage and hate felt by his whole race from Adam down; and then, as if his chest had been a mortar, he burst his hot heart's shell upon it." -Moby Dick
Sign In or Register to comment.