The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Second Life Copyright Infringement Case

Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
edited July 2007 in Games and Technology
SL business sues for copyright infringement
Tue Jul 3, 2007 12:07pm PDT

By Eric Reuters

SECOND LIFE, July 3 (Reuters) - Second Life entrepreneur Kevin Alderman filed a copyright infringement lawsuit on Tuesday against Second Life resident Volkov Catteneo, and Alderman’s lawyer said he plans to subpoena Linden Lab to force it to disclose Catteneo’s real-world identity.

Alderman (Second Life name: Stroker Serpentine) runs the adult-content company Eros LLC. One of the company’s most popular products is the SexGen bed, virtual furniture that contains more than 150 sex animations and retails for L$12,000 (US$45.11).

In “Eros LLC vs John Doe,” filed in the U.S. District Court in Tampa, Alderman accuses Catteneo of illicitly copying and selling the SexGen bed for as little as L$4,000, sharply cutting into Eros’ sales.

Filing a copyright infringement case against “John Doe” is an established practice in Internet cases where the defendant’s identity is not initially apparent, said Alderman’s lawyer, Francis Taney of Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney. For example, the music industry has filed thousands of “John Doe” lawsuits against people it alleges have illicitly shared music online.

Taney said he will seek Catteneo’s identity, chat histories, and financial records from Linden Lab and PayPal.

“Despite reasonable efforts, Eros does not presently know Defendant’s true identity or address but intends to obtain this information by way of subpoenas directed to one or more internet service providers that are likely to have obtained said information from Defendant,” the lawsuit states.

Catteneo told Reuters in a Second Life interview that Alderman had never been in touch with him. Catteneo said he had sold about 50 of the beds on behalf of a third party who pocketed the proceeds.

Catteneo, who declined to provide his real name, said he doesn’t fear the subpoena. “I’m not some kind of noob,” Catteneo said. “My name isn’t on [Linden Lab’s] file. I don’t even have a permanent address [in real life] either.”

Alderman estimated that Eros has sold 100,000 of the beds. Earlier this month the Amsterdam sims, another Alderman creation, were sold to Dutch media firm Boom BV for US$50,000.

The SexGen beds are sold as “no-copy” objects, normally prohibiting their replication. Alderman said he doesn’t know how a copyable version of his product began to circulate in Second Life.

Alderman said he tried to report the copyright violation to Linden Lab in accordance with its Digital Millennium Copyright Act compliance policy, but that he was told to use the in-world “abuse reporting” system.

Linden Lab was not immediately available for comment.

The lawsuit seeks damages equal to three times the damages sustained by Eros or three times the defendant’s profits. But Alderman said he’s less interested in winning damages than stopping the theft of his property.

“We’re not going to sue him for a million dollars,” he said. “I don’t want to crucify the guy. I’m trying to protect my income and my family.”

A copy of the legal filing is available by clicking here (7.5 MB PDF file).

Here's the URL to the original story.

Basically a guy made some item in Second Life, in this case, a sex bed with 150 animations that normally sells for $45. The guy found some other user in SL redistributing his sex bed for much cheaper and has since launched an anonymous copyright infringement lawsuit against the guy because he is only known by his in game avatar and IP address. It will be interesting how this plays out since not only is the offender's identity anonymous but also the item is digital. I don't think the courts will throw out this case since it is not exactly chump change. I think we can all expect more stuff like this to go on however, especially with how people can actually make money in these online economies...

Thoughts?

Lucky Cynic on
«1345

Posts

  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    So wait, the sex bed itself animates or does it show 150 random people having sex? I ... I don't understand what a sex bed is!

    emnmnme on
  • ShlankShlank Registered User regular
    edited July 2007

    “We’re not going to sue him for a million dollars,” he said. “I don’t want to crucify the guy. I’m trying to protect my income and my family.”



    Thoughts?


    Get a real fucking job like the rest of us. [/rant]


    On topic I can't see this being legal because I'm sure the Second Life EULA states that anything created in game is actually property of whoever owns Second Life (Linden Labs?) so technically they could sue this fellow for suing for copyright infringement (?). Seems dumb but that's the way some people are.

    Shlank on
    Shlankx.png
  • HoukHouk Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    is the only way to get this item to pay actual real-world dollars? has it been established that users actually own the copyright to items created in-game? these would help determine if the guy has any case at all.

    in other news, how sad is it that the first major case like this involves a sex bed?

    Houk on
  • NevaNeva Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I think it's pretty funny that these people are willing to go to real life court over a virtual sex bed. I can imagine them standing in front of a judge and jury with a straight face.

    Neva on
    SC2 Beta: Neva.ling

    "Everyone who is capable of logical thought should be able to see why you shouldn't sell lifetime subscriptions to an MMO. Cell phone companies and drug dealers don't offer lifetime subscriptions either, guess why?" - Mugaaz
  • ShogunShogun Hair long; money long; me and broke wizards we don't get along Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Only in America.

    Shogun on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Houk wrote: »
    is the only way to get this item to pay actual real-world dollars? has it been established that users actually own the copyright to items created in-game? these would help determine if the guy has any case at all.

    in other news, how sad is it that the first major case like this involves a sex bed?

    I don't play SL but you can take US dollars and transfer them into Lindens or money inside SL. You can actually make real money from the virtual money which is what all the hoopla is all about. This guy, trying to protect his and feed his family by selling sex beds for $45 is actually being shut out by some other user who sells the exact same bed for about $15. As you can see, this means a huge loss in profits for the family man. And yes, he does own the copyright to his own material in the game.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • Der Waffle MousDer Waffle Mous Blame this on the misfortune of your birth. New Yark, New Yark.Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    One one hand, it's kinda sad how it's a sex bed.

    On the other hand, the dude has apparently made around 4 million in real world dollars selling them.

    Der Waffle Mous on
    Steam PSN: DerWaffleMous Origin: DerWaffleMous Bnet: DerWaffle#1682
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I don't see how this is sad. He has a right to sue for copyright infringement no matter what he makes.

    Couscous on
  • MonoxideMonoxide Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    WHY wrote: »
    One one hand, it's kinda sad how it's a sex bed.

    On the other hand, the dude has apparently made around 4 million in real world dollars selling them.

    Welp, I'm downloading second life...

    Monoxide on
  • HoukHouk Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    titmouse wrote: »
    I don't see how this is sad. He has a right to sue for copyright infringement no matter what he makes.
    i didnt say this was sad. i said its sad that the first case to test digital copyright and ownership like this is over an, apparently, insanely popular 'sex bed'.

    however, i admit im not fully versed in sex bed technology, so im not speaking as an expert here.

    Houk on
  • FireflashFireflash Montreal, QCRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    It's not sad that this guy made a bunch of money from making a virtual sexbed. What's sad is that so many people paid 45$ for a single virtual object. Go get some free porn or something... geez.

    Fireflash on
    PSN: PatParadize
    Battle.net: Fireflash#1425
    Steam Friend code: 45386507
  • SaddlerSaddler Registered User regular
    edited July 2007

    Thoughts?

    Of suicide.

    Saddler on
  • EndomaticEndomatic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Did this guy actually create the animation used in the bed? How does it work?

    Endomatic on
  • The_ScarabThe_Scarab Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    4 million dollars.

    Holy fuck. Guess who is jumping feet first into the sex bed industry!

    The_Scarab on
  • ZsetrekZsetrek Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    WHY wrote: »
    One one hand, it's kinda sad how it's a sex bed.

    On the other hand, the dude has apparently made around 4 million in real world dollars selling them.

    Doesn't that make it more sad?

    Zsetrek on
  • ChenjesuChenjesu Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    emnmnme wrote: »
    So wait, the sex bed itself animates or does it show 150 random people having sex? I ... I don't understand what a sex bed is!

    In Second Life, animations can be linked to objects. So the sex bed would probably have "handles" which you and your baby furry Gorean lover would click on, select a position, and go at it.

    Chenjesu on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Chenjesu wrote: »
    emnmnme wrote: »
    So wait, the sex bed itself animates or does it show 150 random people having sex? I ... I don't understand what a sex bed is!

    In Second Life, animations can be linked to objects. So the sex bed would probably have "handles" which you and your baby furry Gorean lover would click on, select a position, and go at it.

    That's how I imagined it working. Sounds really nifty. :^:\

    Lucky Cynic on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Monoxide wrote: »
    WHY wrote: »
    One one hand, it's kinda sad how it's a sex bed.

    On the other hand, the dude has apparently made around 4 million in real world dollars selling them.

    Welp, I'm downloading second life...

    Edit:

    I just called my job and told them to shove it, now lets get to making some money on SL!

    urahonky on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    urahonky wrote: »
    Monoxide wrote: »
    WHY wrote: »
    One one hand, it's kinda sad how it's a sex bed.

    On the other hand, the dude has apparently made around 4 million in real world dollars selling them.

    Welp, I'm downloading second life...

    I just quit my job. We gotta make a product like that!

    I thought you were fired over a BS customer complaint from Geek Squad.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    urahonky wrote: »
    Monoxide wrote: »
    WHY wrote: »
    One one hand, it's kinda sad how it's a sex bed.

    On the other hand, the dude has apparently made around 4 million in real world dollars selling them.

    Welp, I'm downloading second life...

    I just quit my job. We gotta make a product like that!

    I thought you were fired over a BS customer complaint from Geek Squad.

    That was in October of last year, I've found a job since. :)

    urahonky on
  • HoukHouk Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    being fired is a kind of quitting

    Houk on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Post edited to actually say what I meant it to say...

    urahonky on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    urahonky wrote: »
    urahonky wrote: »
    Monoxide wrote: »
    WHY wrote: »
    One one hand, it's kinda sad how it's a sex bed.

    On the other hand, the dude has apparently made around 4 million in real world dollars selling them.

    Welp, I'm downloading second life...

    I just quit my job. We gotta make a product like that!

    I thought you were fired over a BS customer complaint from Geek Squad.

    That was in October of last year, I've found a job since. :)

    Isn't it amazing at how much information someone willfully gives about themselves freely over the internet.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    urahonky wrote: »
    urahonky wrote: »
    Monoxide wrote: »
    WHY wrote: »
    One one hand, it's kinda sad how it's a sex bed.

    On the other hand, the dude has apparently made around 4 million in real world dollars selling them.

    Welp, I'm downloading second life...

    I just quit my job. We gotta make a product like that!

    I thought you were fired over a BS customer complaint from Geek Squad.

    That was in October of last year, I've found a job since. :)

    Isn't it amazing at how much information someone willfully gives about themselves freely over the internet.

    What? Now you're going to find out where I live?

    (Okay... so I know he lives in Dayton, OH... He got fired from a best buy in october... I know his alias is urahonky... that's all I need!)

    urahonky on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    urahonky wrote: »
    Isn't it amazing at how much information someone willfully gives about themselves freely over the internet.

    What? Now you're going to find out where I live?

    (Okay... so I know he lives in Dayton, OH... He got fired from a best buy in october... I know his alias is urahonky... that's all I need!)

    I bet if I stalked all of your posts, I can gather what kinds of stores you shop at, what games you play (that ones isn't too hard) and what you did last summer.

    Back to topic, I think I might actually check out SL just to see how open the create an item tool is, it seems complex enough to make some really cool stuff. Who knows, maybe I too can make some piece of erotic equipment that I can make money off of. Any dancing robot dongs in SL already?

    Lucky Cynic on
  • PeewiPeewi Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    So, how are they going to sue someone whose real identity they don't know?

    Peewi on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Peewi wrote: »
    So, how are they going to sue someone whose real identity they don't know?

    The same way the RIAA does.

    Couscous on
  • PeewiPeewi Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    titmouse wrote: »
    Peewi wrote: »
    So, how are they going to sue someone whose real identity they don't know?

    The same way the RIAA does.

    How does the RIAA do it?

    Peewi on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    titmouse wrote: »
    Peewi wrote: »
    So, how are they going to sue someone whose real identity they don't know?

    The same way the RIAA does.

    The same way all those companies sue people who redistribute music on websites but cannot find an author or anything. They basically contact ISPs with lawyers and an IP address, and track the account to ensure it is you, and then pounce.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    urahonky wrote: »
    Isn't it amazing at how much information someone willfully gives about themselves freely over the internet.

    What? Now you're going to find out where I live?

    (Okay... so I know he lives in Dayton, OH... He got fired from a best buy in october... I know his alias is urahonky... that's all I need!)

    I bet if I stalked all of your posts, I can gather what kinds of stores you shop at, what games you play (that ones isn't too hard) and what you did last summer.

    Okay...? Why would I care that you know what I did last summer (take a wild guess: played video games! ZOMG STALKER!!), what games I play, what stores I shop at, etc.

    Seriously. Don't act like you can scare me, Mr. Cynic (omg, I know your last name! lawls!).

    urahonky on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    titmouse wrote: »
    Peewi wrote: »
    So, how are they going to sue someone whose real identity they don't know?

    The same way the RIAA does.

    The same way all those companies sue people who redistribute music on websites but cannot find an author or anything. They basically contact ISPs with lawyers and an IP address, and track the account to ensure it is you, and then pounce.

    And I'm sure my ISP will be willing to give you that information if you called them right now. Please call them. :)

    urahonky on
  • Lucky CynicLucky Cynic Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I'm just saying it's funny how much information you leak out everyday. And no, I am not going to hunt you down because you cannot just ask for a stalker they just form over time from use of websites like myspace and facebook.

    Lucky Cynic on
  • urahonkyurahonky Cynical Old Man Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I'm just saying it's funny how much information you leak out everyday. And no, I am not going to hunt you down because you cannot just ask for a stalker they just form over time from use of websites like myspace and facebook.

    I still don't see what you're getting at. But whatever.

    urahonky on
  • slurpeepoopslurpeepoop Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Peewi wrote: »
    titmouse wrote: »
    Peewi wrote: »
    So, how are they going to sue someone whose real identity they don't know?

    The same way the RIAA does.

    How does the RIAA do it?

    What they do is collect all IP addresses they want to sue, attach "John Doe" to the thousands of IP addresses they wish to bring to court, and handle all the cases at once.

    Since nobody knows they're being sued (as their identity hasn't even been discovered yet), nobody goes in to defend themselves (at which point the case would automatically be thrown out) when the RIAA goes to court, so the judge has no choice but to summarily judge against the numerous John Does.

    Flush from their insta-win, the RIAA then goes to the ISP, court order in hand, and tells the ISP to give out all information they have against the IP addresses, otherwise they will be guilty of obstruction of justice or something along those lines, which will get them fined AND sued, etc.

    Most ISPs then give out the information to the RIAA, who then go their merry way suing the shit out of the individuals, and since they already have a win against this person (even though they didn't even know who they were suing at the time), they can get the person to usually settle for $10,000+.

    It is one of the most unethical methods in blackmailing people, and only recently there have been judges that understand the situation who have begun to tell the RIAA to fuck off.

    slurpeepoop on
  • HoukHouk Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    urahonky wrote: »
    titmouse wrote: »
    Peewi wrote: »
    So, how are they going to sue someone whose real identity they don't know?

    The same way the RIAA does.

    The same way all those companies sue people who redistribute music on websites but cannot find an author or anything. They basically contact ISPs with lawyers and an IP address, and track the account to ensure it is you, and then pounce.

    And I'm sure my ISP will be willing to give you that information if you called them right now. Please call them. :)
    dude, that post wasnt even about you

    Houk on
  • KreutzKreutz Blackwater Park, IARegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    This is why the rest of the world hates us. Because we sue other people for the rights to a virtual sex bed.

    A virtual sex bed

    A VIRTUAL FUCKING SEX BED

    Kreutz on
  • Dr. Phibbs McAtheyDr. Phibbs McAthey Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    What irritates me most about this whole thing is that this virtual sex bed sells for $45. As an active 'resident' of SL for almost 2 years now, I think I pull in about that much a month (on a really, really good month) from selling my stuff in game. And as someone who prides himself in the overall quality of my builds, and having seen this sex bed myself, it really pisses me off. Really, anyone who spends 15 minutes with the build tools and another 15 minutes bothering their friends for scripts to run the animations could have made the damn thing. Granted, it's a bed, not looking for the statue of David there, but it's just...bleh. /rant

    Dr. Phibbs McAthey on
  • Raiden333Raiden333 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Kreutz wrote: »

    A VIRTUAL FUCKING SEX BED

    Isn't that a bit redundant?

    Raiden333 on
  • BokiBoki __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    What irritates me most about this whole thing is that this virtual sex bed sells for $45. As an active 'resident' of SL for almost 2 years now, I think I pull in about that much a month (on a really, really good month) from selling my stuff in game. And as someone who prides himself in the overall quality of my builds, and having seen this sex bed myself, it really pisses me off. Really, anyone who spends 15 minutes with the build tools and another 15 minutes bothering their friends for scripts to run the animations could have made the damn thing. Granted, it's a bed, not looking for the statue of David there, but it's just...bleh. /rant

    it's because sex sells bro.

    If you can make that shit so easily why don't you make a copy anyway and just hand them out for free? What would happen if a lot of people started making high quality shit in SL and just gave them away for free? Would the paid content be forced to progress or would everything just fucking collapse?

    Boki on
  • The_ScarabThe_Scarab Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Raiden333 wrote: »
    Kreutz wrote: »

    A VIRTUAL FUCKING SEX BED

    Isn't that a bit redundant?

    Here we play pin the comma on the sentence.


    A VIRTUAL, FUCKING, SEX BED

    A, VIRTUAL FUCKING, SEX BED

    A, VIRTUAL, FUCKING SEX BED

    A, VIRTUAL, FUCKING, SEX, BED

    The_Scarab on
Sign In or Register to comment.