The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Wii Thread : Metroid! Lock this thread and make a new one

1356762

Posts

  • ZoolanderZoolander Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    the vc is disgusting
    so incredibly overpriced
    even sony is doing a better job with their ps1 games
    but there are always plenty of idiots who will buy that crap so hooray for nintendo i guess...

    Zoolander on
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Zoolander wrote: »
    the vc is disgusting
    so incredibly overpriced
    even sony is doing a better job with their ps1 games
    but there are always plenty of idiots who will buy that crap so hooray for nintendo i guess...

    As much as I loathe what they're doing with actual games, I can't help but stare in amazement at the success of their marketing.

    Defender on
  • DynagripDynagrip Break me a million hearts HoustonRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Defender wrote: »
    Dynagrip wrote: »
    I think it'd be a lot more efficient if Defender saved and recycled his posts from the previous Wii threads.

    You should be the head of the Santiation Department for the city of SE++ with ideas like that. We could save millions!
    I don't think I'd have the time/energy/stamina for such a task.

    Dynagrip on
  • DynagripDynagrip Break me a million hearts HoustonRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Zoolander wrote: »
    the vc is disgusting
    so incredibly overpriced
    even sony is doing a better job with their ps1 games
    but there are always plenty of idiots who will buy that crap so hooray for nintendo i guess...
    I've been tempted to get a game or two out of nostalgia but fuck their prices when you actually look at it.

    Dynagrip on
  • VothVoth Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I'm mainly waiting for MP3. It's looking better every day.

    Voth on
    reverbnation -- last.fm -- facebook -- twitter -- bandcamp --youtube -- PSN: audapostrophe -- XBL: audapostrophe -- NNID: audapostrophe -- Myspace
  • MonkeybombMonkeybomb Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I got a Wii because there are a few titles that I know I will want to play and I can afford $250. I laughed at Sony's ridiculous pricing for their console and decided to not get one until they came to their senses.

    With the VC's overpriced 20 year old games and lack of genuine intriguing content, paired with the PS3's price drop, I may just have to get Sony's console and start actually playing next-gen games.

    Monkeybomb on
    Xbox Live Gamertag: Triplemonkeybom
    monkeysig-1.jpg
  • Raybies666Raybies666 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Defender wrote: »
    Reigner wrote: »
    Alright we get it, some people like the Wii some people don't. If it's in the same state a year from now as it is now, then we can have this conversation. Until then can we actually talk about the games and such and stop arguing with Defender?

    I'll start!

    Smash Brothers will be fan-damn-tastic, and hopefully the two other third party characters will end up being Simon Belmont and Mega Man.

    Yeah, let's talk about the games.

    Oh wait. This is all in the future tense. Because the games aren't out. All you're saying is "X will be so good!" There's really no substance to that statement, you're just being a fanboy and saying nothing.

    Zelda says hi. It doesn't matter what it was developed for originally, it is a fine game. resident evil 4 seems so natural with the remote that one poster in G&T said it was like the game was originally developed for the wii and then cut down. It really feels like that. I can't comment on the non waggle games more, because I have rent to pay.

    Wii sports, wii play and Wario are all simple waggle games. But they are fun.
    I have access right now to an N64, Saturn, PS1 and 2 games, Xbox and Xbox360 games. And my wii is still fun to play with :winky:

    Thats only 5 games, but as you said before, you do understand that its in its first year, and most systems are in the same boat.
    Also, the one thing Nintendo has done right that the other two have not, is full backwards compatability out of the box with their last generation system. Not really related to what you were saying, but it just popped into my head.


    And just to respond to the people complaining about the prices of the VC games? In Ireland, its 5 euros for a NES game up to 10 euros for N64. Buying these things second hand from a proper trader costs more. Especially if you want the damn thing to work every time. These are prices similar to renting 1 or 2 dvds for the night. Is it that more expensive in the US? Wikipedia and a currency converter say no.

    Raybies666 on
    Beat me on Wii U: Raybies
    Beat me on 360: Raybies666

    I remember when I had time to be good at games.
  • IskanderIskander Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Gym wrote: »
    Dear Nintendo:
    YOUR COCKSUCKING PRODUCT HAS REDUCED ME TO A GIBBERING MAN-APE WHOSE ONLY RESORT TO DEALING WITH THE ALMIGHTY FUCKING GRIEF IT'S BESTOWED UPON ME IS TO SCREAM AND HURT MYSELF.

    Seriously, I am jumping up and down and throwing my shit in handfuls at the fucking television in some impotent primal effort to get the thing to work. I have been sitting here trying to enjoy your product - YOUR PRODUCT, YOUR GAME, YOUR CONTRACT BETWEEN DEVELOPER AND CONSUMER THAT THE CONSUMER WILL ENJOY YOUR PRODUCT - but instead the damn thing's been crawling out of the console and taking warm shits in my gaping mouth. Swear to god, you should have just added a little door to the console through which a hand pops out and flips me off, because I am insulted that your QA or testers or whatever brainless shitstove three genes short of a monkey FAGNUT signs your games through thought that a person with more than a single fucking digit IQ could enjoy Story Mode Chapter 7. INSULTED.

    WORK WITH ME HERE: The goal's simple enough! Come in first! Hey, that's fine, it's just like playing the grand fucking prix; not a problem! Only deal is your cross-eyed team of tongue-slapping wunderkind decided to give the game every single fucking advantage possible TO THE GAME rather than me.

    How in the fuck does Black Shadow - whose car is the heaviest and lamest piece of shit next to the Crazy Bear - suddenly become SO FUCKING GOOD that he can stay in first without using a drop of boost? Huh!? Why!? You never see this shithead anywhere near the top fucking 20 in a normal race. BUT HO HO HO THIS TIME HE'S MEGA-COCK, THE FASTEST FAGGOT IN THE WORLD. 1.21 GIGAWATTS MARTY, LET'S GO BACK TO THE FUCKING FUTURE.

    But it's not just Black Shadow with the magical powers, it's the entire fucking lineup of racers! THEY'RE ALL FASTER THAN YOU. AND DON'T REQUIRE ANY BOOST.

    But but but I of course, am still driving some piece of shit hamster-powered jalopy who guzzles it's entire energy bar in no less than four fucking boosts! Add to this the entire course just got shitted on by some retarded space tiki volacano god and you've got a course full of hazards that'll drain at least 1/4 of your energy bar JUST BECAUSE IT CAN. WHOOPIE.

    HURRR, you say. THAT'S JUST THE CHALLENGE. IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE EASY. Well fuck that noise, you lopsided frankenfaced fuckfurter.

    Tell me, please, why does the GAME have to win? Huh? What happens when the game wins and I lose? Is there some huge fucking kegger waiting for it when it gets done? Is there money involved? Or perhaps the motives are more sinister. Maybe the game's family is being held hostage by another game and that game has it's cock in F-Zero's wife's mouth and he's holding a cell phone up to her and F-Zero can hear her pained moans and cries for help and the asshole game then says, "You beat that cock-sucking human, or I'll blow her brains out." I COULD UNDERSTAND THAT. I CAN BE SYMPATHETIC.

    It's not any fun if I can't win, you faggots. I want to move on. I want to unlock whatever piece of shit clown car you have hidden away from me so I can start racing and get pissed off with that too. When your game prevents me from fully enjoying the product I have bought you have failed in your fucking mission to deliver a game. You lose! You break the contract! You contract the gay and fucking DIE DIE DIE.

    God Gym I could kiss you right now <3

    /hug

    Iskander on
  • SavedSaved Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Defender wrote: »
    Saved wrote: »
    Defender, I think you're being premature on judging the Wii. You seem to see a lot of thing from a developer's standpoint, which can be very different from that of the traditional consumer.

    I don't think I see it out of balance. I think that I just see the developer's side better than the average gamer.
    Saved wrote: »
    The Wii's remote and pointer functionality gives it a level of interface precision never seen on a console before. These abilities will allow it to do many things that are new for a home console because of the limitations of the traditional gamepad as a control implement. Games could include real-time strategy games, lightgun-style shooters, and precision games that already exist as a proof of concept, like Trauma Center.

    RTS games are better with the mouse. Trauma Center originated as a mouse-based game, and the Stylus actually makes the most sense. Shooting games, yes, as long as you don't have to turn, the pointer is the best.

    Also, I'm not sure about the "precision" that you're talking about. Gesture recognition is actually slower and less precise than button-pushing. And the VAST majority of current Wii games would work as well or better with a standard gamepad than with the Wiimote.
    Saved wrote: »
    The Wii lacks cpu and gpu muscle, which will impede some of the realistic effects it can produce. But it compensates with its interface, which has opened up never-before-seen ways of interacting with games.

    No, it hasn't. Waving my arm to activate the "swing my sword" command is not significantly different from pushing a button to activate the "swing my sword" command, except that it's slower and more likely to be misinterpreted.
    Saved wrote: »
    This is going to take some time until it's fully implemented, with Nintendo leading the way with its first party games. I do urge you to give it some time, until the end of this year at least to see if motion control really is a gimmick.

    So far, all of Nintendo's first-party stuff has been shit made for the GC and ported over with tacked-on controls. Nintendo has failed to lead the way. And Metroid Prime's "you can aim at the screen" thing is an improvement, sure, but it's not some new level of gaming awesomeness that compensates for last-generation-level hardware.
    Saved wrote: »
    As the Wii's market share increases, more third party developers will begin development for Wii first.

    Only if that market share is actually buying games. People who bought the Wii as a fad will not keep up with buying games, and that's really where the money comes from. Also, what kind of games are they buying? Shitty mini-game collections? Whoop-dee-fucking-doo. That's not the innovative "new ways to play" that you referred to a minute ago.
    Saved wrote: »
    Right now the games the Wii is getting are largely ports and quick tries that make dodgy use of the Wii's motion control, developed in the style of an Xbox 360 game, with waggle tacked on in the end. We've already seen this happen with the DS, where for about a year after release developers had little to no idea what to do with the second screen or the stylus/touch interface. This trend will likely stop as the Wii eclipses the 360 as this generation's console with the biggest install base.

    Actually it looks like Miyamoto's plan is to start selling plastic casings like the steering wheel and the zapper, and new input devices like the scale thingy for WiiFit. In other words, to extend the gimmick.
    Saved wrote: »
    There are already two consoles that from a gamer's standpoint do nearly the same thing. Gameplay and library-wise, the PS3 and 360 are more alike than the PS2 and Xbox were. Each game will have a few exclusives from their first party developers, but given that games nowadays are far more expensive than they ever were, with a triple-A title costing in the tens of millions of dollars to produce art assets for, most games are going to be ported around to ensure market penetration. Given that there are two consoles that are already going to share 80% of their games, and the games will look and play nearly identically, do you really need a third?

    Are you seriously saying that it's GOOD that the Wii can't play modern games? You know, if the Wii had better hardware, it could play all these Wiimote-based games AND new cool stuff like Assassin's Creed, Oblivion, Ratchet & Clank, Final Fantasy, MGS, whatever. Now some of those may be exclusives, but the Wii would actually GET some share of those exclusives and also get multi-system versions of the non-exclusives ON TOP OF its own Wiimote-based library. And the Wiimote-based library would be bigger if the console were capable of doing more.
    Saved wrote: »
    I think there's more room in the art of videogames than to just push cpu and gpu power in the pursuit of realism and immersion. Games have been getting increasingly 'realistic' as time goes on as hardware gets more powerful, but that's only one avenue they can take. It's like realism in painting, which is a valid style, and one of the easiest ones to critique. But there are other styles of art out there, abstract, impressionistic, installation, which are just as well respected and recognized as legitimate forms of art. They are neither worse nor better, they have their own value set and appeal on different merits.

    No. Wrong.

    The "art of video games" has NOTHING TO DO WITH MAKING BETTER HARDWARE. Video games are software. Consoles and graphics cards are hardware. Please separate the two in your mind. Making a good CONSOLE and making a good GAME are not the same thing. A carpenter with good tools can do better work than a carpenter with shitty tools. The console is the toolset. There is absolutely no benefit to having a shitty console. Just because your console CAN do real-time dynamic shadows and multipass lights doesn't mean it HAS to do it in every game. It simply means that, if you want to, the option is there.



    The precision is having mouse-like functionality on a console, which so far no console has really taken advantage of. Traditional mice don't work so well in the living room, they require a flat table surface for as many as four players at the same time, and these people are usually sitting on couches, not on desks. The remote-as-pointer is the best method I've seen so far of being able to have multiple people using pointers on screen at the same time.

    I admit that yes, Twilight Princess and a bunch of the games out so far have failed to take advantage of the motion sensing controls, but Wii Sports is compelling enough, even as a tech demo that's simply a collection of mini-games, to convince me that there's definitely something worth playing. Playing Golf and using the remote to swing and control the power of your shot, or even bowling and attempting to twist your wrist to get proper spin on the ball connects you in a way that pushing a button can't.

    The art of video games does have to do with better hardware, you've said that yourself. The depth of gameplay that's possible on the Turbo Grafx 16 isn't the same as what you could do on the Gamecube, just as the GC's depth will pale in comparison with what's possible on the PS3 hardware. I don't think games that rely on traditional controls won't be all that much more immersive for the Wii than they were on the GC. Instead of progressing further down that path the way the 360 and PS3 have, the Wii is moving laterally, keeping hardware that is distinctly last-gen but offering different types of gameplay than currently available (again, see Wii Sports - it's merely a tech demo, but it proves that the functionality is there for a lot of different gameplay styles). It might not be a big step forward for story-telling, but the change in skills required (manual dexterity, movement, aiming) could be enough to make compelling gameplay for the console.

    Saved on
  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Man, I would totally have a strong opinion on the Wii.


    If I could fucking find one anywhere. Seriously, I've got two RSS feeds with Wii-Tracker things and I still cannot seem to get through the ordering fast enough.

    Khavall on
  • Anime OwnsAnime Owns Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Iskander wrote: »

    God Gym I could kiss you right now <3

    /hug

    thanks buddy

    video games :whistle:

    Anime Owns on
  • Raybies666Raybies666 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Gym wrote: »
    Iskander wrote: »

    God Gym I could kiss you right now <3

    /hug

    thanks buddy

    video games :whistle:

    I read that earlier. As an owner of Fzero GX, I salute you.

    Raybies666 on
    Beat me on Wii U: Raybies
    Beat me on 360: Raybies666

    I remember when I had time to be good at games.
  • Anime OwnsAnime Owns Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Well, I didn't write it.

    FZero GX is awesome as long as you skip the story mode.

    Anime Owns on
  • Raybies666Raybies666 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Gym wrote: »
    Well, I didn't write it.

    FZero GX is awesome as long as you skip the story mode.

    Well then, I retract my salute.
    Not really

    Raybies666 on
    Beat me on Wii U: Raybies
    Beat me on 360: Raybies666

    I remember when I had time to be good at games.
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Voth wrote: »
    I'm mainly waiting for MP3. It's looking better every day.

    I think that MP3 looks like it'll be good. I have no idea why, but MP1 made me motion-sick, which is weird because no other FPS I've ever played has done that. But it took about half an hour and then I'd feel really bad. I tried it two or three times, thinking maybe I was just actually sick the first time, and it kept happening at about 30 minutes. So I miss out, which sucks for me, because by all indications that is a solid series.
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    Zelda says hi. It doesn't matter what it was developed for originally, it is a fine game. resident evil 4 seems so natural with the remote that one poster in G&T said it was like the game was originally developed for the wii and then cut down. It really feels like that. I can't comment on the non waggle games more, because I have rent to pay.

    My point was more about the Wii's failure to deliver anything worth talking about. Which, again, is somewhat reasonable since it's still in the first year. I want to make it clear that I'm not bashing it for that, even though I am giving it some shit for things like "MP3 will be a launch title" and it's over 6 months late.

    Zelda is a GC game, and like you said, a fun game on the system is a fun game on the system. But it's a big-name first-party game and it SHOULD have shown some innovative Wiimote usage, and it did not.
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    Wii sports, wii play and Wario are all simple waggle games. But they are fun.
    I have access right now to an N64, Saturn, PS1 and 2 games, Xbox and Xbox360 games. And my wii is still fun to play with :winky:

    Wii Sports is a TECH DEMO that also serves as a new-user tutorial. The fact that people list it as one of the best games on the system is damning.
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    Thats only 5 games, but as you said before, you do understand that its in its first year, and most systems are in the same boat.
    Also, the one thing Nintendo has done right that the other two have not, is full backwards compatability out of the box with their last generation system. Not really related to what you were saying, but it just popped into my head.

    I'm not sure...did the PS3 have any problems? Maybe just one or two games caused problems and it got patched quickly? In any case, all three consoles have it now, and even MS only had a few hiccups with games that did advanced things that went outside of the system's API.

    Defender on
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Saved wrote: »
    The art of video games does have to do with better hardware, you've said that yourself. The depth of gameplay that's possible on the Turbo Grafx 16 isn't the same as what you could do on the Gamecube, just as the GC's depth will pale in comparison with what's possible on the PS3 hardware. I don't think games that rely on traditional controls won't be all that much more immersive for the Wii than they were on the GC. Instead of progressing further down that path the way the 360 and PS3 have, the Wii is moving laterally, keeping hardware that is distinctly last-gen but offering different types of gameplay than currently available (again, see Wii Sports - it's merely a tech demo, but it proves that the functionality is there for a lot of different gameplay styles). It might not be a big step forward for story-telling, but the change in skills required (manual dexterity, movement, aiming) could be enough to make compelling gameplay for the console.

    So the thing does have some new control stuff that gamepads and kb/mouse setups don't. That is true. But is that input functionality worth the tradeoff? So far, it looks like "no," but I admit that there's still some time left.

    I am also increasingly of the opinion that 1:1 swordfighting might not actually be possible, which is a big letdown. You could do something like MGS2's swordfighting, but...well, you can obviously already do that on a gamepad. Gross motions, I'm sure you can do. Fine motions...not so sure. 1:1 needs both.

    Defender on
  • Raybies666Raybies666 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Defender wrote: »
    Voth wrote: »
    I'm mainly waiting for MP3. It's looking better every day.

    I think that MP3 looks like it'll be good. I have no idea why, but MP1 made me motion-sick, which is weird because no other FPS I've ever played has done that. But it took about half an hour and then I'd feel really bad. I tried it two or three times, thinking maybe I was just actually sick the first time, and it kept happening at about 30 minutes. So I miss out, which sucks for me, because by all indications that is a solid series.
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    Zelda says hi. It doesn't matter what it was developed for originally, it is a fine game. resident evil 4 seems so natural with the remote that one poster in G&T said it was like the game was originally developed for the wii and then cut down. It really feels like that. I can't comment on the non waggle games more, because I have rent to pay.

    My point was more about the Wii's failure to deliver anything worth talking about. Which, again, is somewhat reasonable since it's still in the first year. I want to make it clear that I'm not bashing it for that, even though I am giving it some shit for things like "MP3 will be a launch title" and it's over 6 months late.

    Zelda is a GC game, and like you said, a fun game on the system is a fun game on the system. But it's a big-name first-party game and it SHOULD have shown some innovative Wiimote usage, and it did not.
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    Wii sports, wii play and Wario are all simple waggle games. But they are fun.
    I have access right now to an N64, Saturn, PS1 and 2 games, Xbox and Xbox360 games. And my wii is still fun to play with :winky:

    Wii Sports is a TECH DEMO that also serves as a new-user tutorial. The fact that people list it as one of the best games on the system is damning.
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    Thats only 5 games, but as you said before, you do understand that its in its first year, and most systems are in the same boat.
    Also, the one thing Nintendo has done right that the other two have not, is full backwards compatability out of the box with their last generation system. Not really related to what you were saying, but it just popped into my head.

    I'm not sure...did the PS3 have any problems? Maybe just one or two games caused problems and it got patched quickly? In any case, all three consoles have it now, and even MS only had a few hiccups with games that did advanced things that went outside of the system's API.

    First runs of PS3 had hardware backwards compatability, the new sytems in NA and japan do not and the 80 gb model will not. I'm in europe, so I'll never get that at all. None of my xbox games work on my 360.

    I dont see Wii sports being one of the best as damning, moreso than its a tech demo that functions as an actual game, and a fun one at that. Also, games that you can play piss drunk :^: (not that I'm saying other games are not fuin in the same situation, theres a lot of mario party, racing, and guitar hero with beer going on at my place)

    Raybies666 on
    Beat me on Wii U: Raybies
    Beat me on 360: Raybies666

    I remember when I had time to be good at games.
  • IskanderIskander Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Big, fuck-off walls o' text aside, I understand and accept the console for what it is and am enjoying it enough that I don't get the feeling of having misspent my money. There are enough games out right now to get good use out of the console, and also enough games to look forward to in the near future.

    I guess I'm easy to satisfy...

    Iskander on
  • JavenJaven Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    The PS3 has/had huge problems with backwards compatibility and a lot of the same type of "disc read errors" original PS2s had.

    Javen on
  • Anime OwnsAnime Owns Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Javen wrote: »
    The PS3 has/had huge problems with backwards compatibility and a lot of the same type of "disc read errors" original PS2s had.

    it also has the problem of not having any good games to play

    Anime Owns on
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    I dont see Wii sports being one of the best as damning, moreso than its a tech demo that functions as an actual game, and a fun one at that. Also, games that you can play piss drunk :^: (not that I'm saying other games are not fuin in the same situation, theres a lot of mario party, racing, and guitar hero with beer going on at my place)

    Games that you can play piss-drunk are usually not very good games, just like movies that are only fun to watch when you're drunk aren't good movies.

    How about giving me some stuff that I can enjoy without needing to be wasted? How about some fucking gameplay depth, Nintendo? I know you know what that is, because you used to do it all the time.

    Defender on
  • BalefuegoBalefuego Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    None of my xbox games work on my 360.
    What Xbox games do you own? Because most of the worthwhile titles do.

    Balefuego on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Garlic BreadGarlic Bread i'm a bitch i'm a bitch i'm a bitch i'm a Registered User, Disagreeable regular
    edited July 2007
    Balefuego wrote: »
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    None of my xbox games work on my 360.
    What Xbox games do you own? Because most of the worthwhile titles do.

    Beyond Good & Evil is the only one I have that doesn't :(

    Garlic Bread on
  • CampionCampion Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Defender wrote: »
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    I dont see Wii sports being one of the best as damning, moreso than its a tech demo that functions as an actual game, and a fun one at that. Also, games that you can play piss drunk :^: (not that I'm saying other games are not fuin in the same situation, theres a lot of mario party, racing, and guitar hero with beer going on at my place)

    Games that you can play piss-drunk are usually not very good games, just like movies that are only fun to watch when you're drunk aren't good movies.

    Hey, those are pretty different things! Wii sports is fun sober, whereas the movie isn't. Mario Strikers will be tons of fun when it's out, according to those European chaps. Getting together with friends for the first one was amazing, and I've heard that this new one is just so much better.

    Campion on
    4484-7718-8470
  • BalefuegoBalefuego Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Keith wrote: »
    Balefuego wrote: »
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    None of my xbox games work on my 360.
    What Xbox games do you own? Because most of the worthwhile titles do.

    Beyond Good & Evil is the only one I have that doesn't :(

    Yeah the only others I can think of are Panzer Dragoon and Riddick. Oh and the PoP sequels I guess.

    Balefuego on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • MusashiMusashi Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Javen wrote: »
    The PS3 has/had huge problems with backwards compatibility and a lot of the same type of "disc read errors" original PS2s had.

    I don't know how the software emulation BC is working but the hardware one works extremely well with all the games I've tried to play on it.

    The problem was at launch the PS3 BC had some issues with certain games looking extra jagged. You can see the problem here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoCD9TwLrVs

    While not making the games unplayable it did make them look worse. They fixed this problem I think in January (I know it was fixed by the time I was playing God of War 2) and in May added upscaling to PS1/PS2/DVDs which makes them look significantly better on a hi-def TV.

    Musashi on
  • MusashiMusashi Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Gym wrote: »
    it also has the problem of not having any good games to play

    PS3 has plenty of good games to play on it now, just somehow since they are multi-platform games they don't count.

    Musashi on
  • Raybies666Raybies666 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Defender wrote: »
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    I dont see Wii sports being one of the best as damning, moreso than its a tech demo that functions as an actual game, and a fun one at that. Also, games that you can play piss drunk :^: (not that I'm saying other games are not fuin in the same situation, theres a lot of mario party, racing, and guitar hero with beer going on at my place)

    Games that you can play piss-drunk are usually not very good games, just like movies that are only fun to watch when you're drunk aren't good movies.

    How about giving me some stuff that I can enjoy without needing to be wasted? How about some fucking gameplay depth, Nintendo? I know you know what that is, because you used to do it all the time.

    Jesus dude, all I said was it was a good drinking game. Its also a good sober game, and if you try to say guitar hero sucks, i'll cut you. Metaphorically speaking. I was saying that as an aside, to the main point of it being fun anyway.

    Raybies666 on
    Beat me on Wii U: Raybies
    Beat me on 360: Raybies666

    I remember when I had time to be good at games.
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    OK.

    Defender on
  • Garlic BreadGarlic Bread i'm a bitch i'm a bitch i'm a bitch i'm a Registered User, Disagreeable regular
    edited July 2007
    Balefuego wrote: »
    Keith wrote: »
    Balefuego wrote: »
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    None of my xbox games work on my 360.
    What Xbox games do you own? Because most of the worthwhile titles do.

    Beyond Good & Evil is the only one I have that doesn't :(

    Yeah the only others I can think of are Panzer Dragoon and Riddick. Oh and the PoP sequels I guess.

    Panzer Dragoon was added like two months ago

    Garlic Bread on
  • Raybies666Raybies666 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I can't remember off hand, some were traded in with the original sys. Just Cause doesn't work, BOOOOOOOO!

    Raybies666 on
    Beat me on Wii U: Raybies
    Beat me on 360: Raybies666

    I remember when I had time to be good at games.
  • MonkeybombMonkeybomb Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Jesus, page four is like a high school debate team vomited all over the thread.

    Monkeybomb on
    Xbox Live Gamertag: Triplemonkeybom
    monkeysig-1.jpg
  • Raybies666Raybies666 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Double post??!!

    In other news:
    Monkeybomb wrote: »
    Jesus, page four is like a high school debate team vomited all over the thread.

    FTW. And now its time to get the hell out of work

    Raybies666 on
    Beat me on Wii U: Raybies
    Beat me on 360: Raybies666

    I remember when I had time to be good at games.
  • M.D.M.D. and then what happens? Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I think i'll buy Eternal Darkness. I never played it but a friend of mine enjoyed it.

    M.D. on
  • MonkeybombMonkeybomb Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    oh jesus, I was just ftw'd


    I think that means I actually lose.

    Monkeybomb on
    Xbox Live Gamertag: Triplemonkeybom
    monkeysig-1.jpg
  • lostwordslostwords Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Monkeybomb wrote: »
    oh jesus, I was just ftw'd


    I think that means I actually lose.


    double whammy

    lostwords on
    rat.jpg tumbler? steam/ps3 thingie: lostwords Amazon Wishlist!
  • MonkeybombMonkeybomb Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    If I could just post a single ! I would.

    Monkeybomb on
    Xbox Live Gamertag: Triplemonkeybom
    monkeysig-1.jpg
  • BalefuegoBalefuego Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Keith wrote: »
    Balefuego wrote: »
    Keith wrote: »
    Balefuego wrote: »
    Raybies666 wrote: »
    None of my xbox games work on my 360.
    What Xbox games do you own? Because most of the worthwhile titles do.

    Beyond Good & Evil is the only one I have that doesn't :(

    Yeah the only others I can think of are Panzer Dragoon and Riddick. Oh and the PoP sequels I guess.

    Panzer Dragoon was added like two months ago

    Well shit

    Balefuego on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • SavedSaved Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Zoolander wrote: »
    the vc is disgusting
    so incredibly overpriced
    even sony is doing a better job with their ps1 games
    but there are always plenty of idiots who will buy that crap so hooray for nintendo i guess...

    I must admit that I use the Virtual Console because I am an idiot.

    Having never been allowed to own a home console until I moved out, it's been a pretty fun way of catching up on all of the games I missed without the hassle of hunting down the hardware and making room for it. The prices really should be closer to $1 for NES/TG16, $3 for SNES/Gen, $5 for N64.

    However, I think I've gotten my $8 worth out of Super Mario World.

    Although buying the classic controllers is a bitch, if they hadn't come in a bundle with the points card I wouldn't have bothered.

    Saved on
  • Anime OwnsAnime Owns Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I don't really have a problem with any of the VC pricing. I only buy games I've never played, and I think I have 7-8 games now.

    Then again, I spend copious amounts of money on plastic toy soldiers, so what do I know. :roll:

    Anime Owns on
This discussion has been closed.