Club PA 2.0 has arrived! If you'd like to access some extra PA content and help support the forums, check it out at patreon.com/ClubPA
The image size limit has been raised to 1mb! Anything larger than that should be linked to. This is a HARD limit, please do not abuse it.
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

[PHALLA] SMTensei: Digital Devil Phalla [Karma Temple victory!]

1235712

Posts

  • nevilleneville The Worst Gay (Seriously. The Worst!)Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    !query Squashua

    sorry dude, you're sounding fishy

    neville on
    nevillexmassig1.png
  • GnastyGnasty Registered User
    edited July 2007
    I would assume that if an anomaly was only weak to Almighty and you analyzed it, it would probably say that it was weak to Almighty (rather than lying to you about its weakness, which is what you seem to be saying is possible in your post). The process of elimination idea is definitely solid, though.

    Gnasty on
    i just wanna 'be myself'
  • SpeedySwafSpeedySwaf Registered User
    edited July 2007
    Gnasty wrote: »
    I would assume that if an anomaly was only weak to Almighty and you analyzed it, it would probably say that it was weak to Almighty (rather than lying to you about its weakness, which is what you seem to be saying is possible in your post). The process of elimination idea is definitely solid, though.
    I don't think the analyzer will do that, though. Then all you'd have to do is vote on one person, then let every team analyze a different person. You'd be testing up to five or so players rather then one.

    SpeedySwaf on
    Deguello wrote:
    Nintendo set up a DS buffet and all the third parties went to the PSP Diner. The Diner came down with a case of botulism and everybody wonders why Nintendo is fat when they return.
  • PbPb Registered User
    edited July 2007
    !query Squashua

    Well, at this point it looks like you're going to win this vote no matter how the rest of us go, especially considering you were going to vote for yourself.

    Pb on
  • PotUPotU __BANNED USERS
    edited July 2007
    Oh hell, not again. Why do I always have to die so early.

    Well, have fun.

    PotU on
    2mong9u.jpg
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Green wrote: »
    JohnHam wrote: »
    man he showed you

    think twice 'fo correctin' him.

    I don't mind

    I would rather have a query vote than our possible figurehead taking himself out of the game due to rule violation

    With two failed attacks against him, I figured that Green is a good secondary query target. It's not going to KILL him, y'know.

    And just in case, at least one person should vote to query someone else out of left field. Like, say... FemBot.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Gnasty wrote: »
    In regards to Squashua requesting my clan to analyze him: My clan would rather not be told who we should analyze. We'll decide that for ourselves.

    I'll take that as you rp'ing your clan's dissent rather than anything else b/c it would seriously HELP the group if at least one clan that was not my own analyzed me. If more than one clan analyzed, that's fine, but to me it's a waste of a second analysis that could have been put to use elsewhere.

    After the analysis, PM me with my weakness and I'll confirm.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • SpeedySwafSpeedySwaf Registered User
    edited July 2007
    query Pb

    *shrug*

    Just figure we should check the quiet ones.

    SpeedySwaf on
    Deguello wrote:
    Nintendo set up a DS buffet and all the third parties went to the PSP Diner. The Diner came down with a case of botulism and everybody wonders why Nintendo is fat when they return.
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    SpeedySwaf wrote: »
    query Pb

    *shrug*

    Just figure we should check the quiet ones.

    :^::^:

    Hence my selection of FemBot. The reason I say this is that we don't know how the Query system works and we've been fucked by other Phallas before (pun unintended).

    If I get killed, it might go to second place (Green, in my opinion), and if Green gets killed, it goes to third place (FemBot).

    I will likely get targeted and turned into an anomaly tonight, or if the goal of the anomaly is to convert as many as possible, since it's known that I'm being seered, the anomaly might not pick me.

    Either way, I'm non-anomaly at the moment, so we'll see tonight. Maybe it's a random thing.

    AND ANOTHER NOTE
    If there are conversions, that means if your clan has a leader, he could be a conversion target.
    If your clan leader (random selection) is the conversion target, being the only one who can submit the clan action, he will likely TRUMP your clan action.

    Make sure your leader CC's all clan members when sending the clan action to Drez.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • GnastyGnasty Registered User
    edited July 2007
    Squashua wrote: »
    Gnasty wrote: »
    In regards to Squashua requesting my clan to analyze him: My clan would rather not be told who we should analyze. We'll decide that for ourselves.

    I'll take that as you rp'ing your clan's dissent rather than anything else b/c it would seriously HELP the group if at least one clan that was not my own analyzed me. If more than one clan analyzed, that's fine, but to me it's a waste of a second analysis that could have been put to use elsewhere.

    After the analysis, PM me with my weakness and I'll confirm.
    Squashua, if we're going to publicly seer you there is no reason for my clan to analyze you. And no, it isn't just RPing. My clan does not think that it is in our best interests to have our analysis be decided publicly and by someone else.

    Gnasty on
    i just wanna 'be myself'
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Gnasty wrote: »
    Squashua wrote: »
    Gnasty wrote: »
    In regards to Squashua requesting my clan to analyze him: My clan would rather not be told who we should analyze. We'll decide that for ourselves.

    I'll take that as you rp'ing your clan's dissent rather than anything else b/c it would seriously HELP the group if at least one clan that was not my own analyzed me. If more than one clan analyzed, that's fine, but to me it's a waste of a second analysis that could have been put to use elsewhere.

    After the analysis, PM me with my weakness and I'll confirm.
    Squashua, if we're going to publicly seer you there is no reason for my clan to analyze you. And no, it isn't just RPing. My clan does not think that it is in our best interests to have our analysis be decided publicly and by someone else.

    The public seer gives different results than an analysis.

    The public seer said that Tossrock was not an anomaly.
    It did not tell me his weakness.

    The clan analysis we did of you told us your weakness.
    It did not tell us you were an anomaly.

    The public seer and group analysis are two different things.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Clarification: If a clan representative dies, a new clan representative is chosen. I just didn't want to receive multiple or conflicting PMs for clan actions.

    Drez on
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Drez wrote: »
    Clarification: If a clan representative dies, a new clan representative is chosen. I just didn't want to receive multiple or conflicting PMs for clan actions.

    But (and this is speculation as I have no idea what the anomaly does) what if the clan representative is converted into an anomaly? From the non-anomalous player perspective, that would mean that the representative is corrupted and therefore will not serve the interests of the clan.

    Meaning that the representative might conveniently "forget" to send the message or may send a message with altered targets.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • FembotFembot Registered User
    edited July 2007
    Munkus has been just as quiet as I have, so if we've got enough votes on Squashua, I'm gonna pick him.

    query: Munkus Beaver

    Fembot on
  • FembotFembot Registered User
    edited July 2007
    Also, I was kind of surprised to see the "query fembot as a backup, they're being quiet" thing. I thought I had posted much more! I must have been dream posting again. >_>

    Fembot on
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Fembot wrote: »
    Munkus has been just as quiet as I have, so if we've got enough votes on Squashua, I'm gonna pick him.

    query: Munkus Beaver

    I have the lead, but I don't believe I have a "solid" majority yet.

    What I mean by not having a "solid" majority is that if the 3 anomalies are currently voting for me and they switch their votes to someone else, that target might end up in the lead.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    I'm actually not that quiet here.

    I'm just not loud and not shutting up like squash.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Twitch Channel
    Steam: munkus_beaver
    Humor can be dissected, as a frog can, but it dies in the process.
    http://www.ccfa.org/
  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Clarification: The Karma Terminal feels that it has sufficiently clarified itself on all issues it deigns to for today. As such the Karma Terminal will be at Quiznos and/or playing Persona 3 until shortly before narration. The Karma Terminal's private messaging box is clear, so send in any unsent actions. Thank you.

    Drez on
  • GnastyGnasty Registered User
    edited July 2007
    Squashua wrote: »
    Gnasty wrote: »
    Squashua wrote: »
    Gnasty wrote: »
    In regards to Squashua requesting my clan to analyze him: My clan would rather not be told who we should analyze. We'll decide that for ourselves.

    I'll take that as you rp'ing your clan's dissent rather than anything else b/c it would seriously HELP the group if at least one clan that was not my own analyzed me. If more than one clan analyzed, that's fine, but to me it's a waste of a second analysis that could have been put to use elsewhere.

    After the analysis, PM me with my weakness and I'll confirm.
    Squashua, if we're going to publicly seer you there is no reason for my clan to analyze you. And no, it isn't just RPing. My clan does not think that it is in our best interests to have our analysis be decided publicly and by someone else.

    The public seer gives different results than an analysis.

    The public seer said that Tossrock was not an anomaly.
    It did not tell me his weakness.

    The clan analysis we did of you told us your weakness.
    It did not tell us you were an anomaly.

    The public seer and group analysis are two different things.

    I know that they are different things, but maybe you remember why you wanted my clan to analyze you in the first place?
    Squashua wrote:
    4) One clan should volunteer to analyze me to prove I have a singular weakness so that you know I'm not the "queen" Anomaly. I will suggest that Gnasty's clan analyze me, since we have his analysis. Don't waste multiple analysis on me; find the others.

    If we publicly seer you, we will find out if you are an anomaly or not. My clan's analysis is not required.

    Gnasty on
    i just wanna 'be myself'
  • nevilleneville The Worst Gay (Seriously. The Worst!)Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Fembot wrote: »
    Also, I was kind of surprised to see the "query fembot as a backup, they're being quiet" thing. I thought I had posted much more! I must have been dream posting again. >_>

    Everyone suspects the Queen!

    Speaking of which... where were you last night?
    Your Royal ANOMALYNESS

    >_>

    neville on
    nevillexmassig1.png
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Gnasty wrote: »
    If we publicly seer you, we will find out if you are an anomaly or not.
    My clan's analysis is not required.

    What I'm asking is that if I seer as an anomaly, a clan analysis will help determine if I'm the queen anomaly.
    At the moment, I'm not an anomaly. In several hours, I might be. And I know I'm not the queen (though I do like to wear women's hats...)

    It doesn't have to be your clan.

    I only specified your clan b/c it's only fair to you if we have reciprocal information.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • FembotFembot Registered User
    edited July 2007
    neville wrote: »
    Fembot wrote: »
    Also, I was kind of surprised to see the "query fembot as a backup, they're being quiet" thing. I thought I had posted much more! I must have been dream posting again. >_>

    Everyone suspects the Queen!

    Speaking of which... where were you last night?
    Your Royal ANOMALYNESS

    >_>

    Absolutely none of your business! What are you doing, trying to take attention away from yourself?

    <_<

    Fembot on
  • nevilleneville The Worst Gay (Seriously. The Worst!)Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Fembot wrote: »
    neville wrote: »
    Fembot wrote: »
    Also, I was kind of surprised to see the "query fembot as a backup, they're being quiet" thing. I thought I had posted much more! I must have been dream posting again. >_>

    Everyone suspects the Queen!

    Speaking of which... where were you last night?
    Your Royal ANOMALYNESS

    >_>

    Absolutely none of your business! What are you doing, trying to take attention away from yourself?

    <_<

    OF COURSE NOT.
    GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

    neville on
    nevillexmassig1.png
  • StraightziStraightzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    GOD SAVE THE QUEEN


    Oh goddammit now look what you've done you bastard.

    Straightzi on
  • TossrockTossrock too weird to live too rare to dieRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Well, we could keep querying me every night to check if I go anomaly, and then use me as a coordinator

    Dunno.

    Tossrock on
    sig.png
  • nevilleneville The Worst Gay (Seriously. The Worst!)Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Quetzi wrote: »
    GOD SAVE THE QUEEN


    Oh goddammit now look what you've done you bastard.

    Made you look a fool, eh

    neville on
    nevillexmassig1.png
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Tossrock wrote: »
    Well, we could keep querying me every night to check if I go anomaly, and then use me as a coordinator

    Dunno.

    That could work, but as (at least my clan's) analysis shows, it doesn't reveal anomaly status and there doesn't seem to be any other way to "locate" anomalies beyond the group scan.

    Or at least, the clan analysis I viewed didn't confirm/deny that the target was an anomaly; it only gave the weakness.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • nevilleneville The Worst Gay (Seriously. The Worst!)Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Squashua wrote: »
    Tossrock wrote: »
    Well, we could keep querying me every night to check if I go anomaly, and then use me as a coordinator

    Dunno.

    That could work, but as (at least my clan's) analysis shows, it doesn't reveal anomaly status and there doesn't seem to be any other way to "locate" anomalies beyond the group scan.

    Or at least, the clan analysis I viewed didn't confirm/deny that the target was an anomaly; it only gave the weakness.

    Well, not to mention the fact that we're then wasting our votes and/or queries on the same person going "Yep. Still ok" while the anomalies are possibly growing.

    That seems... bad.

    neville on
    nevillexmassig1.png
  • StraightziStraightzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    neville wrote: »
    Quetzi wrote: »
    GOD SAVE THE QUEEN


    Oh goddammit now look what you've done you bastard.

    Made you look a fool, eh

    It's second nature man. I can't help it. Whenever someone says god save the queen, or long live the king, or anything of the sort, I just gotta repeat it.

    Straightzi on
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    neville wrote: »
    Squashua wrote: »
    Tossrock wrote: »
    Well, we could keep querying me every night to check if I go anomaly, and then use me as a coordinator

    Dunno.

    That could work, but as (at least my clan's) analysis shows, it doesn't reveal anomaly status and there doesn't seem to be any other way to "locate" anomalies beyond the group scan.

    Or at least, the clan analysis I viewed didn't confirm/deny that the target was an anomaly; it only gave the weakness.

    Well, not to mention the fact that we're then wasting our votes and/or queries on the same person going "Yep. Still ok" while the anomalies are possibly growing.

    That seems... bad.

    I agree. The only ability that would be worth a damn in this game is an Anomaly Blocker. Like, use it on Tossrock or myself tonight (or pull a "selfish guardin" thing and self-guard; yeah, I know) and maintain it to help establish a public known continual non-anomaly. I don't know if such a thing exists.

    There's probably a player out there who is Anomaly Immune. And they might not even know it.

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Guys, unfortunately, due to not having any plans tonight, the narration will not be late.

    Drez on
  • GreenGreen Stick around. I'm full of bad ideas.Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    But late narrations are SE Phalla tradition! D:

    Green on
    3DS: 3007 8087 2767 | Nintendo ID: AngryFrog
  • StraightziStraightzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    GODDAMMIT DREZ I HATE YOU

    Straightzi on
  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Sure, rub it in.

    Drez on
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    There is no Santa Claus. :cry:

    Squashua on
    humebackgroundcj5.jpg
    [size=-2]WII 8980 7585 1015 3348 BRAWL 3909 7191 9283 STRIKERS 124661 822404[/size]
  • StraightziStraightzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    So, who's everyone attacking tonight?

    Straightzi on
  • nevilleneville The Worst Gay (Seriously. The Worst!)Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Quetzi wrote: »
    So, who's everyone attacking tonight?

    Drez.

    neville on
    nevillexmassig1.png
  • StraightziStraightzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    neville wrote: »
    Quetzi wrote: »
    So, who's everyone attacking tonight?

    Drez.

    Is he still The Sylar?

    Straightzi on
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Drezlar.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Twitch Channel
    Steam: munkus_beaver
    Humor can be dissected, as a frog can, but it dies in the process.
    http://www.ccfa.org/
  • StraightziStraightzi Here we may reign secure, and in my choice, To reign is worth ambition though in HellRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    The Drezlar.

    Straightzi on
Sign In or Register to comment.