The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Please critique my (likely) future computer! (Plus advice about headphones)

atkbobatkbob Registered User regular
edited July 2007 in Games and Technology
I'll be getting a new computer for school next year, and I'll be buying from Dell (I don't really have a choice). This is what I've come up with:

Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E6600 (4MB L2 Cache,2.4GHz,1066 FSB)
Genuine Windows Vistaâ„¢ Ultimate Edition
4GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 4 DIMMs
640GB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 320GB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs)
Integrated Sound Blaster®Audigy™ HD Software Edition
768MB nVidia GeForce 8800 GTX

20 inch UltraSharpâ„¢ 2007WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel
Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 16x DVD+/-RW w/ dbl layer write capable
Dell WL6000 5.8GHz Wireless Rear 5.1 Speaker System with Subwoofer
Kingston 2GB USB 2.0 Memory Key - Enhanced for Windows ReadyBoost

I have a few questions:
1) Is it worth the extra $250 CDN to upgrade the processor to 2.66 GHz? Also, what does FSB mean and why is it important?
2) Is there a problem with the RAM being 667MHz while the processor is 1066 (I don't have a choice, the RAM doesn't go higher)?
3) Dell says that the Sound Blaster® X-Fi™ XtremeMusic (D) Sound Card isn't Vista compatable. Are they wrong in saying this, and/or should I upgrade from what is above?
4) Is the video card going to last me a couple of years, and can I play Crysis and other graphic-heavy games with it?
5) Is the monitor good? I have a 19'' NEC CRT right now. Is the 20 inch monitor going to feel small (size is lost due to it being widescreen)?
6) Can I assume that the dual drives can read and write CDs?
7) Do any of you guys know if the speakers are good? I've read a lot reviews from both sides of the spectrum.
8) I'll be getting the USB key for portable storage purposes, but what does the ReadyBoost do? Can I use that to increase my RAM?

In addition, I plan to pick up headphones so I can listen to music and play games without bothering other people next door in residence. Do you have any suggestions? My price range is about $0 to $150 CDN.

In terms of gaming, I plan to pick up Bioshock, the Orange Box, ESIV:O GOTY edition, and Crysis over the next few months. Should I be fine in terms of systems requirements?

atkbobsig4kp5me8zl.png
atkbob on

Posts

  • EshEsh Tending bar. FFXIV. Motorcycles. Portland, ORRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    atkbob wrote: »
    I'll be getting a new computer for school next year, and I'll be buying from Dell (I don't really have a choice). This is what I've come up with:

    Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E6600 (4MB L2 Cache,2.4GHz,1066 FSB)
    Genuine Windows Vistaâ„¢ Ultimate Edition
    4GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 4 DIMMs
    640GB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 320GB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs)
    Integrated Sound Blaster®Audigy™ HD Software Edition
    768MB nVidia GeForce 8800 GTX

    20 inch UltraSharpâ„¢ 2007WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel
    Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 16x DVD+/-RW w/ dbl layer write capable
    Dell WL6000 5.8GHz Wireless Rear 5.1 Speaker System with Subwoofer
    Kingston 2GB USB 2.0 Memory Key - Enhanced for Windows ReadyBoost

    I have a few questions:
    1) Is it worth the extra $250 CDN to upgrade the processor to 2.66 GHz? Also, what does FSB mean and why is it important?
    2) Is there a problem with the RAM being 667MHz while the processor is 1066 (I don't have a choice, the RAM doesn't go higher)?
    3) Dell says that the Sound Blaster® X-Fi™ XtremeMusic (D) Sound Card isn't Vista compatable. Are they wrong in saying this, and/or should I upgrade from what is above?
    4) Is the video card going to last me a couple of years, and can I play Crysis and other graphic-heavy games with it?
    5) Is the monitor good? I have a 19'' NEC CRT right now. Is the 20 inch monitor going to feel small (size is lost due to it being widescreen)?
    6) Can I assume that the dual drives can read and write CDs?
    7) Do any of you guys know if the speakers are good? I've read a lot reviews from both sides of the spectrum.
    8) I'll be getting the USB key for portable storage purposes, but what does the ReadyBoost do? Can I use that to increase my RAM?

    In addition, I plan to pick up headphones so I can listen to music and play games without bothering other people next door in residence. Do you have any suggestions? My price range is about $0 to $150 CDN.

    In terms of gaming, I plan to pick up Bioshock, the Orange Box, ESIV:O GOTY edition, and Crysis over the next few months. Should I be fine in terms of systems requirements?

    Why does this post feel more masturbatory than anything?

    "In terms of gaming, I plan to pick up Bioshock, the Orange Box, ESIV:O GOTY edition, and Crysis over the next few months. Should I be fine in terms of systems requirements?"

    And did you REALLY just ask this in regards to that machine?

    Esh on
  • jkylefultonjkylefulton Squid...or Kid? NNID - majpellRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I basically bought this exact same computer last week (first computer upgrade in almost years). Anyhow, I went with the 24" monitor - it's worth the extra money. Believe me, it's worth the extra money. If you need to chop something, get a slightly slower processor. Also, spend the extra $12 for the 800mhz RAM instead of the 667mhz RAM (at least, that was the difference between the two last week).

    7) Do any of you guys know if the speakers are good? I've read a lot reviews from both sides of the spectrum.

    They're the same speakers I'm using right now, and they seem fine to me.

    I just noticed that your post mentions that you don't have a choice in regards to RAM speed. You'll probably find that testing a bunch of different configurations on the Dell website will yeild a 'better' machine.

    jkylefulton on
    tOkYVT2.jpg
  • atkbobatkbob Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Esh wrote: »
    atkbob wrote: »
    I'll be getting a new computer for school next year, and I'll be buying from Dell (I don't really have a choice). This is what I've come up with:

    Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E6600 (4MB L2 Cache,2.4GHz,1066 FSB)
    Genuine Windows Vistaâ„¢ Ultimate Edition
    4GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 4 DIMMs
    640GB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 320GB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs)
    Integrated Sound Blaster®Audigy™ HD Software Edition
    768MB nVidia GeForce 8800 GTX

    20 inch UltraSharpâ„¢ 2007WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel
    Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 16x DVD+/-RW w/ dbl layer write capable
    Dell WL6000 5.8GHz Wireless Rear 5.1 Speaker System with Subwoofer
    Kingston 2GB USB 2.0 Memory Key - Enhanced for Windows ReadyBoost

    I have a few questions:
    1) Is it worth the extra $250 CDN to upgrade the processor to 2.66 GHz? Also, what does FSB mean and why is it important?
    2) Is there a problem with the RAM being 667MHz while the processor is 1066 (I don't have a choice, the RAM doesn't go higher)?
    3) Dell says that the Sound Blaster® X-Fi™ XtremeMusic (D) Sound Card isn't Vista compatable. Are they wrong in saying this, and/or should I upgrade from what is above?
    4) Is the video card going to last me a couple of years, and can I play Crysis and other graphic-heavy games with it?
    5) Is the monitor good? I have a 19'' NEC CRT right now. Is the 20 inch monitor going to feel small (size is lost due to it being widescreen)?
    6) Can I assume that the dual drives can read and write CDs?
    7) Do any of you guys know if the speakers are good? I've read a lot reviews from both sides of the spectrum.
    8) I'll be getting the USB key for portable storage purposes, but what does the ReadyBoost do? Can I use that to increase my RAM?

    In addition, I plan to pick up headphones so I can listen to music and play games without bothering other people next door in residence. Do you have any suggestions? My price range is about $0 to $150 CDN.

    In terms of gaming, I plan to pick up Bioshock, the Orange Box, ESIV:O GOTY edition, and Crysis over the next few months. Should I be fine in terms of systems requirements?

    Why does this post feel more masturbatory than anything?

    "In terms of gaming, I plan to pick up Bioshock, the Orange Box, ESIV:O GOTY edition, and Crysis over the next few months. Should I be fine in terms of systems requirements?"

    And did you REALLY just ask this in regards to that machine?
    I don't know that much about computers in terms of hardware. I'm posting from a 5 year old 731 Mhz machine, and the above computer would be my first computer (this is my brother's old computer). I thought it might be good because of the price (including a bunch of other stuff I didn't post it comes out to $3702 CDN). I just want to make sure that I get a computer that will last a couple of years.

    atkbob on
    atkbobsig4kp5me8zl.png
  • gneGnegneGne Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    1) No, not really. Unless you just have too much cash... The Intel processors just got a refresh though, Im not sure if Dell will also refresh it's options. The E6750(2.66ghz) is now the new E6600(2.4ghz).
    2) No, it shouldn't be the problem if the motherboard supports 667Mhz RAM.
    3) I've heard that this is true.
    4) You will be able to play Crysis, however I can't see into the future.
    5) You will only lose depth :P. You could also do the math 1280x1024 vs 1680x1050.
    6) Not sure, what does it tell exactly?
    7) A friend of mine has Dell speakers, they're OK.
    8) Yes, but its pretty complicated when it actually gives a "boost". You should be fine with 4GBs of RAM. don't bother I would say.

    On the headphones, I have good experiences with my Sennheiser HD590. I'm not sure how much they cost in CDN. Sennheiser HD555 probably are and they are awesome. Don't put up with crappy headphone+microphone in one if you are going to listen to music (if you're a little picky like me).

    Yes, you should be very fine. Perhaps even too fine :D.

    gneGne on
    pasigcopyox6.jpg
  • mausmalonemausmalone Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    atkbob wrote: »
    (snip)

    20 inch UltraSharp™ 2007WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel
    Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 16x DVD+/-RW w/ dbl layer write capable

    (snip)

    (a) good god skip the dual drive bullshit. You'll never need the second drive.

    (b) If you're into console gaming at all, get the 24" Dell 2007WFP instead of the 20" so that you can hook your systems up to the various A/V input jacks on the back, including component inputs for your newest stuff.

    (c) Since you're getting 4GB of RAM, don't bother getting a USB key specifically for Ready-Boost. Since most of your RAM will be unused 99% of the time, Vista will do all the Ready-Boost style disk caching there. Ready-Boost is a feature designed for people who can't easily upgrade the amount of RAM they have and want some extra speed, like people using a company-owned computer or using a laptop or who just aren't skilled enough to add RAM.

    mausmalone on
    266.jpg
  • atkbobatkbob Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I basically bought this exact same computer last week (first computer upgrade in almost years). Anyhow, I went with the 24" monitor - it's worth the extra money. Believe me, it's worth the extra money. If you need to chop something, get a slightly slower processor. Also, spend the extra $12 for the 800mhz RAM instead of the 667mhz RAM (at least, that was the difference between the two last week).

    7) Do any of you guys know if the speakers are good? I've read a lot reviews from both sides of the spectrum.

    They're the same speakers I'm using right now, and they seem fine to me.

    I just noticed that your post mentions that you don't have a choice in regards to RAM speed. You'll probably find that testing a bunch of different configurations on the Dell website will yeild a 'better' machine.
    The problem with the monitor is that I could get two 20" for the price of one 24". If you think it's a big difference though, I'll definitely consider it. Also, I've gone over the website many times looking for RAM upgrades, and I can't find any. I'm at the Canadian site picking a Dimension 9200. There's an option under the XPS system (which increases the price by $1000 for the case alone), and it's possible to get 1066 MHz RAM for $700 more.
    gneGne wrote: »
    1) No, not really. Unless you just have too much cash... The Intel processors just got a refresh though, Im not sure if Dell will also refresh it's options. The E6750(2.66ghz) is now the new E6600(2.4ghz).
    2) No, it shouldn't be the problem if the motherboard supports 667Mhz RAM.
    3) I've heard that this is true.
    4) You will be able to play Crysis, however I can't see into the future.
    5) You will only lose depth :P. You could also do the math 1280x1024 vs 1680x1050.
    6) Not sure, what does it tell exactly?
    7) A friend of mine has Dell speakers, they're OK.
    8) Yes, but its pretty complicated when it actually gives a "boost". You should be fine with 4GBs of RAM. don't bother I would say.

    On the headphones, I have good experiences with my Sennheiser HD590. I'm not sure how much they cost in CDN. Sennheiser HD555 probably are and they are awesome. Don't put up with crappy headphone+microphone in one if you are going to listen to music (if you're a little picky like me).

    Yes, you should be very fine. Perhaps even too fine :D.
    There's been no change in the price of the processors. When was the price drop? Also, I ask about the monitor seeming smaller because the height of the screen would be smaller, which could be annoying when viewing websites and writing documents.
    mausmalone wrote: »
    atkbob wrote: »
    (snip)

    20 inch UltraSharp™ 2007WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel
    Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 16x DVD+/-RW w/ dbl layer write capable

    (snip)

    (a) good god skip the dual drive bullshit. You'll never need the second drive.

    (b) If you're into console gaming at all, get the 24" Dell 2007WFP instead of the 20" so that you can hook your systems up to the various A/V input jacks on the back, including component inputs for your newest stuff.

    The 20" has the same A/V jacks as the 24" (at least they both have component). But, neither have HDMI, but they have DVI, so could I buy a DVI-HDMI adapter/plug thingy in the future?

    On another note, do most games now have widescreen options? Would it make the viewing area larger, or just stretch it out?

    atkbob on
    atkbobsig4kp5me8zl.png
  • AlgrunAlgrun Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    In my experience, spending that much on a machine and getting a smaller (in this case) monitor is a huge waste of money. You cannot futureproof computers all that well, and buying a middle of the road machine with middle of the road (except for maybe the graphics card) components every 3 years is much more efficient and will do almost everything you require of this monster, except for the top-top-top-notch graphics. And you won't even see how good your machine is unless you buy a bigger monitor.

    You can dumb down the processor, the RAM, even the graphics card and still get an up to date awesome machine. Buy a huge monitor if you can. It is WAY more worth it than the small boosts the other components can get you. But that is just me, and I do not have cash monies, so I look for value and efficiency over luxuries. But, yeah. Big nice monitor is VERY important for a superpowerful rig. It's not worth all that machine to waste on a 20".

    As for headphones: Sennheiser PX-100's have NEVER done me wrong, except that I used them so much I wore out the ear pads. And Sennheiser sent me new ones for about 5 bucks. http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-PX-100-Collapsible-Headphones/dp/B000089GN3/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-1334323-0774031?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1185214730&sr=8-1

    Best sound/portabilty I've found under 100 bucks. Only downside is they are somewhat loud to the people around you, for headphones.

    Algrun on
  • PmoneyPmoney Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Here is a better question. Why are you buying from dell? If you are getting a desktop, why not simply buy the parts and toss it together. If you have no pc-building knowlege spend a day reading online. Or buy a book.

    I got the PCGamer PC building bible for the first system I built. It is not nearly as hard as it looks. Chances are, you would save a ton of money, enough to upgrade to a larger monitor even.

    Pmoney on
    Steam : Pmoney
    360 : ThePmoney
    Battle.net: Pmoney.thereal
  • mausmalonemausmalone Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    atkbob wrote: »
    (snip)

    There's been no change in the price of the processors. When was the price drop? Also, I ask about the monitor seeming smaller because the height of the screen would be smaller, which could be annoying when viewing websites and writing documents.
    mausmalone wrote: »
    atkbob wrote: »
    (snip)

    20 inch UltraSharpâ„¢ 2007WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel
    Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 16x DVD+/-RW w/ dbl layer write capable

    (snip)

    (a) good god skip the dual drive bullshit. You'll never need the second drive.

    (b) If you're into console gaming at all, get the 24" Dell 2007WFP instead of the 20" so that you can hook your systems up to the various A/V input jacks on the back, including component inputs for your newest stuff.

    The 20" has the same A/V jacks as the 24" (at least they both have component). But, neither have HDMI, but they have DVI, so could I buy a DVI-HDMI adapter/plug thingy in the future?

    On another note, do most games now have widescreen options? Would it make the viewing area larger, or just stretch it out?

    Check again, the 20" WFP only has DVI and VGA, but no analog AV inputs whatsoever. On the good side, it's DVD-D with HDCP so you should be able to hook up HDMI sources with an adapter.

    The reason I say that the 24" monitor is so damned good is that it's a higher resolution, and therefore you can see a lot more at once. It runs at 1920x1200, and can even rotate (so that you have a vertical 1200x1920 monitor for viewing very tall documents).

    mausmalone on
    266.jpg
  • setrajonassetrajonas Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    If you're getting the 8800GTX, you'll want at least a 30" (2560x1600 res) monitor to take advantage of it. Getting a monitor with anything less than that resolution for a video card that powerful is wasteful IMO.

    setrajonas on
  • atkbobatkbob Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    First of all, I want to thank all of you for your input. I've talked to my Dad about some of the upgrades you suggested (he's the reason I'm using Dell, he's a complete Dell-fanboy for reasons I can't begin to understand and he's also paying for all of this).

    He found a place on the website where if I build the computer from there, for an extra $100 I can get the 24" monitor and the Intel® Core™ 2 Q6600 Quad-Core (8MB L2 cache,2.4GHz,1066FSB). Is there any reason to go Duo instead of Quad (I don't really understand the technology behind either)?

    atkbob on
    atkbobsig4kp5me8zl.png
  • TychoCelchuuuTychoCelchuuu PIGEON Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I'd get a set of Sennheiser PC150s for the headphones. As for the graphics card, you seem obscenely rich, but you could probably bump down to a 8800GTS with 640 megs of RAM and really not have to worry, unless you buy a 30" and start running things at 2560x1600 which is really the only size the GTX is going to do much for you for a while. For DX9 basically into eternity the 8800 should definitely last you, and since it looks like the DX10 peformance of the first gen of DX10 cards isn't so hot (see: CoH benchmarks), you'll have to end up upgrading later anyways if you want to play games in DX10 mode.

    As for Duo vs. Quad, this is the kind of thing you want to do some research on :D

    A Duo is 2 processors, more or less. A Quad is 4 (not really but whatever). Quad isn't going to give you any performance increase at all unless you

    A. do multiple things at once (lots of things) that are processor intensive. Like, encode some music while you play a game, and also burn a CD. And run Photoshop. Twice.

    B. use multithreaded apps. These apps will take advantage of your 4 cores and run much faster. Unless you routinely render 3d graphics or do complex math calculations it's unlikely any programs you use are really multithreaded.

    A Duo is, then, generally your best bet, since 2 cores handles your average user's multitasking really well. The only big reason to go with a Quad aside from the 2 above is to be future-proof: as multiple procs start to get more common, people will write more multithreaded apps to take advantage of them. If you want your CPU to last you until you get Alzheimers or something, a Quad is probably a better idea, but otherwise it might be good to go for a Duo.

    TychoCelchuuu on
  • chipotleherochipotlehero Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I wouldnt spend the 200 bucks for the processor upgrade, I doubt you would even notice it.

    I echo the fact from these other guys that you really should get a bigger monitor. At least 22". The price on them have dropped _drastically_ recently. I would recommend not even getting it from Dell and look on tiger direct or newegg for one, since thats where you'll get the deals, ACER's are great value monitors. They look good and cost little.

    I've been using JVC HA-NC100 Headphones for like 2 years now (like 5 hours a day) and they are amazing, plus they were only like 30 bucks. They're great for music or single player gaming. If you want one with a mic, I'd get some cheap logitech ones for like 15 bucks off newegg.

    That computer will last for at least 2 or 3 years for games.

    chipotlehero on
  • atkbobatkbob Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I'd get a set of Sennheiser PC150s for the headphones. As for the graphics card, you seem obscenely rich, but you could probably bump down to a 8800GTS with 640 megs of RAM and really not have to worry, unless you buy a 30" and start running things at 2560x1600 which is really the only size the GTX is going to do much for you for a while. For DX9 basically into eternity the 8800 should definitely last you, and since it looks like the DX10 peformance of the first gen of DX10 cards isn't so hot (see: CoH benchmarks), you'll have to end up upgrading later anyways if you want to play games in DX10 mode.

    As for Duo vs. Quad, this is the kind of thing you want to do some research on :D

    A Duo is 2 processors, more or less. A Quad is 4 (not really but whatever). Quad isn't going to give you any performance increase at all unless you

    A. do multiple things at once (lots of things) that are processor intensive. Like, encode some music while you play a game, and also burn a CD. And run Photoshop. Twice.

    B. use multithreaded apps. These apps will take advantage of your 4 cores and run much faster. Unless you routinely render 3d graphics or do complex math calculations it's unlikely any programs you use are really multithreaded.

    A Duo is, then, generally your best bet, since 2 cores handles your average user's multitasking really well. The only big reason to go with a Quad aside from the 2 above is to be future-proof: as multiple procs start to get more common, people will write more multithreaded apps to take advantage of them. If you want your CPU to last you until you get Alzheimers or something, a Quad is probably a better idea, but otherwise it might be good to go for a Duo.
    The thing is that the Duo and the Quad come out to be about the same price (because of the way Dell has its customizable packages set up). The question is whether the Quad will run worse than the Duo.

    On another note, looking at the HDD, is it better to get a 750GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s Hard Drive (7200RPM) w/DataBurst Cacheâ„¢ or a 640GB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 320GB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs)? I sort of understand how RAID works, but I'm not sure what ATA is or which is better.

    atkbob on
    atkbobsig4kp5me8zl.png
  • setrajonassetrajonas Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Serial ATA = SATA. I'm not too clear on RAID myself, but I believe RAID 0 gives a performance boost, but with no data redundancy/backup.

    setrajonas on
  • mausmalonemausmalone Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    atkbob wrote: »
    (snip)
    The thing is that the Duo and the Quad come out to be about the same price (because of the way Dell has its customizable packages set up). The question is whether the Quad will run worse than the Duo.

    On another note, looking at the HDD, is it better to get a 750GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s Hard Drive (7200RPM) w/DataBurst Cache™ or a 640GB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 320GB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs)? I sort of understand how RAID works, but I'm not sure what ATA is or which is better.

    The Quad won't run slower than the Duo unless you're talking about a single-threaded heavily CPU-bound process ... like a 3D renderer, single-cpu editions of folding @ home, or a video encoder.

    However, in day-to-day usage, the Quad will seem about equivalent to the same speed Duo, but faster in certain situations. For example, it'll make your system more responsive when you have a lot of different things running simultaneously ... or it'll significantly speed up things designed for multi-threading.

    EDIT: And if you're really as out-of-date with computer technology as you say, I'd recommend getting a single 750GB drive instead of a pair of 320's in Raid 0 simply because it'll save you a lot of time and hassle in the end. Also it frees up a slot for future expandability. Technically it'll be slower this way, but with 4GB of RAM it's not like you're going to be relying on it for virtual memory as much as you are on your current drive, so it won't be much of a problem.

    mausmalone on
    266.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.