The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Pit Bulls - Murderous Ghetto Dog, or Murderous Dog?

powersspowerss Registered User regular
edited July 2007 in Debate and/or Discourse
This thread is not to discuss DOG FIGHTING.

Again, this thread is not meant to discuss DOG FIGHTING.

I have a very one sided opinion of Pit Bulls. Call me colored by the media - but it's mostly my own research.

The majority of dog bites that require hospital care/emergency care are caused by Pit Bulls.

Pit Bulls are used for fighting.

Pit Bulls were selectively bred for muscle mass, destructive jaw structure, and aggressiveness.

Now for my opinions:

If you own a Pit Bull, it's for one primary reason. You wanted the machismo/look cool effect above all else.

Pit Bulls are largely owned by owners who don't know how to properly train, care, or handle a deadly animal.

Pit Bulls are an unfortunate cultural phenomena perpetuated by "Street" and "Hip-Hop/Rap" gang-banging culture.

I never trust Pit Bulls. Ever.

I feel that they should be a banned breed in every major city in the US. Population over 200,000? Banned Pit Bulls.

The breed should be eradicated, as it was on the brink of being earlier in the century.

Now, discuss!

powerss on
«134567

Posts

  • hambonehambone Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    You're wrong.

    1798.jpg

    hambone on
    Just a bunch of intoxicated pigeons.
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Could you cite where you found out pit bulls are bred for aggression. Cause my brother in law's must be, like, the retarded nephew or something. Dog loves playing with kids. Never been around a pit bull that wasn't friendly.

    Quid on
  • powersspowerss Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Oh god. This is all Pit Bull sympathizers can come up with. Look at the cute fucking puppy!

    Come the fuck on.

    powerss on
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I bet that's an annoying little fucker when he wakes up.

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • powersspowerss Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Quid wrote: »
    Could you cite where you found out pit bulls are bred for aggression. Cause my brother in law's must be, like, the retarded nephew or something. Dog loves playing with kids. Never been around a pit bull that wasn't friendly.

    Wikipedia.org. They were specifically bred for fighting. The goddamn name, man.

    powerss on
  • kaz67kaz67 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I see no reason to ban them, once they are properly trained and socialized they are harmless.

    kaz67 on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    powerss wrote: »
    This thread is not to discuss DOG FIGHTING.

    Again, this thread is not meant to discuss DOG FIGHTING.
    Pit Bulls are used for fighting.
    Also, if you're going to set rules, try to follow them.

    I've also come to the conclusion that if many pit bulls are bred for fighting, then it would be inevitable that most of the dog bites treated in hospitals are given by pit bulls. This does not, however, mean that a large number of pit bulls are biting people.

    Quid on
  • kaz67kaz67 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    powerss wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Could you cite where you found out pit bulls are bred for aggression. Cause my brother in law's must be, like, the retarded nephew or something. Dog loves playing with kids. Never been around a pit bull that wasn't friendly.

    Wikipedia.org. They were specifically bred for fighting. The goddamn name, man.

    "Pit bulls are not bred for dog aggression. Pit bulls, as with any dog, can be aggressive if they are mistreated. Pit bulls are basically hardwired to listen to their owners"

    From wikipedia...

    kaz67 on
  • powersspowerss Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    kaz67 wrote: »
    I see no reason to ban them, once they are properly trained and socialized they are harmless.

    I argue that they can never be properly trained and socialized, as they can snap at any moment - and when they do, their physical traits make them much more dangerous than other dogs.

    powerss on
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    kaz67 wrote: »
    I see no reason to ban them, once they are properly trained and socialized they are harmless.

    That's not my understanding. They are probably harmless, but I don't think training will entirely erase or override breeding.

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • AhhseeAhhsee Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Dogs, like children, usually turn out to be how they are raised.

    The statistics you've shown only prove that possibly, pit bull bites are "worse" than other dog bites.

    Banning of breeds of dogs is completely retarded anyways. The biggest problem is the fact that dog owners are not required to do anything other than make sure their dogs stay alive. Nothing is said about treatment other than don't starve, try to kill, or treat it inhumane. And even then, someone needs to complain long before the dogs bite anyone.

    I think it's kind of funny the best in show winner for one of the previous years' Westminster Dog Show was in fact, a pit bull. This dog would be confiscated, and euthanized in many cities in this country. Completely absurd when this dog was raised correctly, and so many more are.

    My question is, where does it end? If a dog is 50/50 mix pit bull, it needs to be killed? What % is okay?

    Regardless of what your answer could be, the idea is completely retarded.

    I'll say it once to repeat it all, and for those that believe even this is tl;dr...

    RESPONSIBILITY LIES UPON THE OWNER'S HEAD, NOT THE DOG'S.

    Ahhsee on
    newsigji1.jpg
    Click image for my huge backlog :\\\
  • BobCescaBobCesca Is a girl Birmingham, UKRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    powerss wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Could you cite where you found out pit bulls are bred for aggression. Cause my brother in law's must be, like, the retarded nephew or something. Dog loves playing with kids. Never been around a pit bull that wasn't friendly.

    Wikipedia.org. They were specifically bred for fighting. The goddamn name, man.

    That's as in bred for fighting as a subset of species, not as in they cannot be trained to be loveable, family pets. In this case it is the fault of the owner if they have an aggressive dog, not the dog's fault. For god's sake, a spaniel can be aggressive and a danger to people if it's not trained right and not brought up in a loving home!

    EDIT: beaten by a much better reply.

    BobCesca on
  • AhhseeAhhsee Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Btw, all dogs can be aggressive. When provoked, even a damned poodle would try to rip your throat out.

    Ahhsee on
    newsigji1.jpg
    Click image for my huge backlog :\\\
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    powerss wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Could you cite where you found out pit bulls are bred for aggression. Cause my brother in law's must be, like, the retarded nephew or something. Dog loves playing with kids. Never been around a pit bull that wasn't friendly.

    Wikipedia.org. They were specifically bred for fighting. The goddamn name, man.
    The keyword there would be were. Bull dogs were bred to take down motherfucking bulls. Would you ban them from rural areas with cattle today?

    Quid on
  • hambonehambone Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    powerss wrote: »
    Oh god. This is all Pit Bull sympathizers can come up with. Look at the cute fucking puppy!

    Come the fuck on.

    I guess it was just too hard for me to come up with a proper counter argument to your assertion that hip hop is the reason dogs bite people.

    hambone on
    Just a bunch of intoxicated pigeons.
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Quid wrote: »
    powerss wrote: »
    Wikipedia.org. They were specifically bred for fighting. The goddamn name, man.
    The keyword there would be were.
    Did the breeding go away?

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    öhsee wrote: »
    Btw, all dogs can be aggressive. When provoked, even a damned poodle would try to rip your throat out.
    Poodles are actually really agressive in my experience. We had a toy one that would hang off your arm if you let it.

    Not your sleeve, your arm.

    I hear the bigger ones can be worse if not trained properly. We should probably ban them.

    Quid on
  • ZekZek Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    The only important question here is whether or not Pit Bulls are more likely to be aggressive than other dogs based solely on their genetics.

    Does anyone actually have sources to confirm/deny that?

    Zek on
  • kaz67kaz67 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    kaz67 wrote: »
    I see no reason to ban them, once they are properly trained and socialized they are harmless.

    That's not my understanding. They are probably harmless, but I don't think training will entirely erase or override breeding.

    Well yea, you could say no dog is completely harmless but at the end of the day if the dog is trained properly chances are it won't hurt anyone. Pit bulls are generally no longer bred for aggression so over time that becomes less of a factor.

    kaz67 on
  • AhhseeAhhsee Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Quid wrote: »
    powerss wrote: »
    Wikipedia.org. They were specifically bred for fighting. The goddamn name, man.
    The keyword there would be were.
    Did the breeding go away?

    Breeding means bringing out certain qualities of the dog. "Fighting" may mean strong, hard bite, short hair, things suitable for a dog that will be possibly fighting anything, especially other dogs. This could mean breeding into it strong aggression, and viciousness.

    The thing is, this isn't how the dogs turn out. These characteristics are in the breed, along with shortcomings of all purebred dogs, but they need to be emphasized in training.

    The simple fact is, if you don't train your dog to be obedient and part of society, it will revert to its natural ways. Dogs aren't that far off from wolves, and they can all be mean as hell if you don't do things right.

    Question, is this a real thread? This seems more like trolling, and the people posting in favor of getting rid of the breed aren't exactly partaking in any form of debate or discussion, just spouting crap the media on TV does.

    Seems more like a troll thread to me.

    Ahhsee on
    newsigji1.jpg
    Click image for my huge backlog :\\\
  • HobbesHobbes Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I was hoping to get a thread about gangster rappers. :P

    I have only met one nice pitbull. My aunt had it wearing dog cologne....... Don't ask...

    Hobbes on
    3DS 0817-4246-8005
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Quid wrote: »
    powerss wrote: »
    Wikipedia.org. They were specifically bred for fighting. The goddamn name, man.
    The keyword there would be were.
    Did the breeding go away?
    For the majority of pit bulls, much like bull dogs, their original job is not why they are bred anymore. They're now mainly bred because they're a popular looking pet. Because of this, traits that are sought after by official breeders are generally friendliness, intelligence, etc. I'm not saying it's impossible for a pit bull to go insane and kill your family with a cheese grater. I'm just saying properly trained pit bulls aren't any more likely to than most other dogs.

    Quid on
  • SavantSavant Simply Barbaric Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I have simply one word for pit bulls

    story.byrd.senate.jpg

    Barbaric!

    (Seriously though, I didn't know what pit bulls looked like until just recently)

    Savant on
  • hambonehambone Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    dianebutchysmall.jpg
    an unfortunate cultural phenomena perpetuated by "Street" and "Hip-Hop/Rap" gang-banging culture

    hambone on
    Just a bunch of intoxicated pigeons.
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    kaz67 wrote: »
    kaz67 wrote: »
    I see no reason to ban them, once they are properly trained and socialized they are harmless.

    That's not my understanding. They are probably harmless, but I don't think training will entirely erase or override breeding.

    Well yea, you could say no dog is completely harmless but at the end of the day if the dog is trained properly chances are it won't hurt anyone. Pit bulls are generally no longer bred for aggression so over time that becomes less of a factor.

    Well, no, you could say that a Welsh Corgie is roughly as dangerous as a large spoon- that is, completely harmless barring something extremely strange and/or Steven Segal.

    Pit bulls don't pull this phenomenon off as well. It's a fair point that they are often no longer bred for aggression, but I suspect that the problem of genetics doesn't resolve itself that quickly. Maybe if they were bred explicitely for nonaggression, I could concede the point to you. But they often aren't, to the best of my knowledge.

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • STATE OF THE ART ROBOTSTATE OF THE ART ROBOT Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Dogs aren't born with an aggression. That is brought on by bad training. My realitive has a pit bull that is well trained and is a nice dog. I am willing to bet that you have been attacked or had a frightening experience with a pitbull if you hate them this much.

    STATE OF THE ART ROBOT on
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    öhsee wrote: »
    Question, is this a real thread? This seems more like trolling, and the people posting in favor of getting rid of the breed aren't exactly partaking in any form of debate or discussion, just spouting crap the media on TV does.

    Fuck you.

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • AhhseeAhhsee Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Whatever, all I hear is crap saying "i had a bad experience with this type of dog, KILL THEM ALL!"

    Hey, a black guy stole my TV! KILL THEM ALL!

    Ahhsee on
    newsigji1.jpg
    Click image for my huge backlog :\\\
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Dogs aren't born with an aggression. That is brought on by bad training. My realitive has a pit bull that is well trained and is a nice dog. I am willing to bet that you have been attacked or had a frightening experience with a pitbull if you hate them this much.
    You can't breed personality traits into dogs?

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • MrBallbagginsMrBallbaggins Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Fuck you.

    I may not agree with what you're arguing, but I like how you argue it.

    MrBallbaggins on
  • STATE OF THE ART ROBOTSTATE OF THE ART ROBOT Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Dogs aren't born with an aggression. That is brought on by bad training. My realitive has a pit bull that is well trained and is a nice dog. I am willing to bet that you have been attacked or had a frightening experience with a pitbull if you hate them this much.
    You can't breed personality traits into dogs?

    No, you can. But the majority of dog bites is brought on by bad training.

    STATE OF THE ART ROBOT on
  • Loren MichaelLoren Michael Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Reposting this comment from the [Chat] thread. Don't drag Eddy into this though, he doesn't want to partake.
    I'm sort of torn. Upbringing is a huge part of any dog's temperment, but instincts are also bred into dogs. My bichon frise loves to do circus tricks, the jack russels love to chase and fight small animals, and the great dane loves to have something to carry on her back, despite the fact that they were all raised in a suburban home.

    Would a pit bull still have the love of fighting in it?

    That's my problem, too.

    Also, it seems almost directly analogous to having an exceptionally dangerous weapon, akin to a gun. Certainly, one could be responsible (via good training, good home), but a gun doesn't have the problem of breeding. It's not going to act on its own.

    I suppose I should be saying this in a different thread.

    SOTAR, the statement, "dogs aren't born with an aggression" doesn't seem like it holds up, was my issue.

    Loren Michael on
    a7iea7nzewtq.jpg
  • kaz67kaz67 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Generally speaking dogs are no longer bred for aggression. Chances are if you buy your dog from a reputable breeder or pet store it won't naturally have an aggressive personality. As far as pit bulls go I firmly believe its more a problem with the owners than the dogs themselves.

    kaz67 on
  • MrBallbagginsMrBallbaggins Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Dogs tend to pick up on their owner's personality traits. My dog, for instance, loves the pussy and eats a lot of cheese. I think the OP does have a point with the wrong type of person owning this dog (not to say that plenty of right kinds of persons don't own it, as they do). But eliminating the breed wouldn't do a damn thing about it, they'd just find another kind of dog to get.

    MrBallbaggins on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Well, no, you could say that a Welsh Corgie is roughly as dangerous as a large spoon- that is, completely harmless barring something extremely strange and/or Steven Segal.

    Pit bulls don't pull this phenomenon off as well. It's a fair point that they are often no longer bred for aggression, but I suspect that the problem of genetics doesn't resolve itself that quickly. Maybe if they were bred explicitely for nonaggression, I could concede the point to you. But they often aren't, to the best of my knowledge.
    The only reason pit bulls still get a bad name is because they are still a popular fighting dog. However, the AKC is not breeding an army of ravenous killers. All dogs have aggression in them. It's a basic survival trait. Whether that becomes encouraged is up to the owner.

    Quid on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    If you own a Pit Bull, it's for one primary reason. You wanted the machismo/look cool effect above all else.
    Or you just like pit bulls. I am sure Jon Stewart is all about machismo.
    The majority of dog bites that require hospital care/emergency care are caused by Pit Bulls.
    The majority of TVs stolen are stolen by poor people. Ban poor people!
    I never trust Pit Bulls. Ever.
    So?
    Pit Bulls are an unfortunate cultural phenomena perpetuated by "Street" and "Hip-Hop/Rap" gang-banging culture.
    Those damn Little Rascals and 19th and early 20th century people! If it wasn't for their damn "hip-hop", the pit bull breed would have died out a long time ago.
    Pit Bulls are used for fighting.
    So are chickens.
    Pit Bulls are largely owned by owners who don't know how to properly train, care, or handle a deadly animal.
    And banning pit bulls would somehow prevent them from getting a different large breed of dog to abuse?

    Couscous on
  • Stupid Mr Whoopsie NameStupid Mr Whoopsie Name Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    So I bought a futon the other day, and called up this bloke on Craig'sList to help me move it. He turned out to be a real cool cat, and when we were moving we discussed PitBulls, mainly cos he owns one.

    He said they have a real bad reputation, all for reasons that have been cited already, but he told me the *reason* for this is because the pitbull is a dog that can be trained to do *anything*.

    Meaning, you train it to be a bloodlusting psyscho dog, that's what it's going to do. You train it to be a snuggle-bug, that's what it'll be. They are just naturally a dog you can program.

    He has a young daughter, and told me that often he has to scold his *daughter* not to be too rough with the dog when they play, and has never feared his dog would lash out and bite on its own.

    This is all anecdotal, but take it for what it is.

    Stupid Mr Whoopsie Name on
  • AhhseeAhhsee Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I remember rottweilers being very popular for a while before the "pit bull craze" I guess they should be next on the chopping block.

    Hell, head on down to harlem or the south bronx, and any dog breed you see, find that breed everywhere, and kill them.

    These ideas are completely unfounded, save for some very speculative personal experiences, or mumbo jumbo someone found on the internet. Bad owners will find dogs to abuse, it's simple fact until people are taught how to raise and love animals.

    Sadly, that's the real thing that needs to be done. Train HUMAN BEINGS so they can properly train dogs.

    Ahhsee on
    newsigji1.jpg
    Click image for my huge backlog :\\\
  • STATE OF THE ART ROBOTSTATE OF THE ART ROBOT Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Not all Pit Bulls are born with an aggression. Are some born with a tendency to be aggressive? Yes. But the majority of it depends on training. You can teach aggressive Pit Bulls not to bite. You can also teach normally docile Pit Bulls to be vicious. I am saying that 95% of the dog's personality comes from the training it recieves. Anyone who is thinking about this in absolutes is wrong. Saying "All Pit Bulls are vicious" is wrong.

    STATE OF THE ART ROBOT on
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited July 2007
    Pit bulls can be dangerous and pit bulls, it's highly likely for pit bulls to be dangerous, and pit bulls are inherently dangerous are all different statements that require varying levels of proof, and you can't just jump from one to the other because it's convenient.

    And hey, something else that's a product of hip-hop! What are you, 50?

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
This discussion has been closed.