The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Is the PS3 stuck in third place?

145791020

Posts

  • Psycho Internet HawkPsycho Internet Hawk Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Zeromus wrote: »
    I get the feeling that the Wii interest might actually start to dwindle in the near future, especially when heavy-hitters start releasing for the PS3 (FFXIII, MGS4). While I wouldn't think it wise to overestimate the impact those games are going to have, I also don't think it's any better to underestimate how fast interest in the Wii is dropping with gamers.


    Speaking for myself I sold my Wii that I had bought at launch - got tired of waiting for a great game to come out. Before the flames start -- the Wii is feeling an awful lot like the N64 - I just don't get into buying all games with mario luigi wario - just not my bag.

    I do think that I will eventually pick a wii up again, for some type of kickass sword play component or lightsaber deal. And in all defense I did purchase about 6 wii games that I played off and on but couldnt justify keeping the system any longer - hell its been about 4 months and Im still waiting to see that mega title come out that I just got to have.

    From speaking to two other friends that purchased their wii's at launch they mirrored my sentiments fwiw.

    The PS3 isn't doing much better. The 360 wasn't so hot until about a year after launch too.

    This happens with every system, ever. After the initial launch rush, developers start looking towards the following holiday season, because that's usually when consumers start splurging, and after that there's the usual price drop to definatively push them into the mainstream.

    Psycho Internet Hawk on
    ezek1t.jpg
  • Ziac45Ziac45 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    JCRooks wrote: »
    It was something MS talked about a few years ago, after the launch of the XBox. Live isn't a gaming service, it's a delivery service. They plan to expand to, as they already have, movie content, but beyond that, airing television through it as well, eventually predominating over other cable services. They literally called it the "battle for the living room," and that big computer/coffee table thing they showed recently is another aspect of it. After they've broken in the major commercial buyers of those, they'll release a less costly model for the average consumer.

    It's all there just waiting to be integrated into one massive service for everything, going straight through MS. It's not a conspiracy theory, it's what they're actually planning on doing. The 360 is just a part of this idea where, like with the PC market, they will become a dominant, standardized platform with all things media and entertainment as well.

    It's not a far-fetched idea at all to think that MS wants to win the "battle for the living room". But I would argue that's a battle that everyone is involved in and wants to win ... including Sony and to a lesser-extent, Nintendo. As mentioned already, Sony is making in-roads with Blu-ray and PSN. I'm surprised they haven't launched a video marketplace offering, similar to Live Marketplace. Nintendo obviously wants the family's attention focused on the Wii. Also with the various Wii Channels, it's already got things that are not entirely game-focused, and they do expect people to leave their Wii on 24x7.

    Also, just because this battle is happening doesn't have to mean that the platform holders "don't give a shit about video games". I know for a fact that the folks who work in games at MS are passionate about their craft. We don't go in thinking, "I want to rule the living room", but rather, "How do I make a great game? What can we do to make our customers happy?". It's the same way for folks at Nintendo and Sony as well.

    So, you might want to get off your high horse there and stop being so cynical. :P

    It's not cynical when you look at the way Microsoft has treated the PC market. Their gaming division comes off as a means to an end. Sure, the people working in the gaming division probably care about games, but, and this is clear when you look at the dead-end that was the XBox, the bottom line in how it plays in to their overall goal is all that matters when it comes to the rest of the company.

    Yes and I'm sure the higher ups and such at Sony care so much about video games. The thing is the Other divisions/bosses at these company's don't care about video games. None of 'em do, it's all a means to an end normally that end is to make money. None of the big three are excluded you just seem to want to pin this purely on microsoft.

    Ziac45 on
  • Tw4winTw4win Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Zeromus wrote: »
    I get the feeling that the Wii interest might actually start to dwindle in the near future, especially when heavy-hitters start releasing for the PS3 (FFXIII, MGS4). While I wouldn't think it wise to overestimate the impact those games are going to have, I also don't think it's any better to underestimate how fast interest in the Wii is dropping with gamers.


    Speaking for myself I sold my Wii that I had bought at launch - got tired of waiting for a great game to come out. Before the flames start -- the Wii is feeling an awful lot like the N64 - I just don't get into buying all games with mario luigi wario - just not my bag.

    I do think that I will eventually pick a wii up again, for some type of kickass sword play component or lightsaber deal. And in all defense I did purchase about 6 wii games that I played off and on but couldnt justify keeping the system any longer - hell its been about 4 months and Im still waiting to see that mega title come out that I just got to have.

    From speaking to two other friends that purchased their wii's at launch they mirrored my sentiments fwiw.

    I'm starting to feel the same way, except I won't sell my Wii.

    I'm still waiting for a game that isn't a party game, isn't a port of a GC game (or didn't start out originally as a GC game), and uses the Wii remote well enough for me to say "I can't imagine playing this with a normal controller." That game hasn't happened yet...maybe Metroid Prime 3 will be that game.

    So far for the Wii I've played:

    Zelda - GC port, Wii controls were nice but not necessary
    Sonic - Decent game but again the Wii Controls didn't astound me
    Super Paper Mario - I really loved this game but it started life on the GC and really didn't use the Wii remote at all
    RE4 - GC port but in this instance I really liked the Wii remote controls

    Tw4win on
    steam_sig.png
  • JCRooksJCRooks Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    It's not cynical when you look at the way Microsoft has treated the PC market. Their gaming division comes off as a means to an end. Sure, the people working in the gaming division probably care about games, but, and this is clear when you look at the dead-end that was the XBox, the bottom line in how it plays in to their overall goal is all that matters when it comes to the rest of the company.
    This is starting to get off-topic, so I'll try to bring it back in line.

    Does it really matter to us gamers what the parent company's end goal is? Yes, it's pretty apparent that MS wants its software and services everywhere, and Sony wants its hardware everywhere, and Nintendo just wants to continue dominating in the games business (and it's making a ploy to casual/non-gamers to do so). It's a no brainer really. These are corporations, after all, trying to make a profit.

    In the meantime, if they end up providing games and services that we all enjoy and are willing to pay for, isn't that really what matters in the end?

    I know that Sony's using the PS3 to push Blu-ray, because it believes its good for their parent company overall. Personally, I don't like it because it pushes up the price of the PS3 quite a bit. That said, I'll still get one eventually (probably next year, MGS4 just looks too sweet to pass up). I don't think I have a moral responsibility to "punish" Sony just because they're doing what they think is good for their business. I may not agree with it personally, but I'm not a shareholder so I don't really care. All I see is a gaming machine with a lot of untapped potential.

    JCRooks on
    Xbox LIVE, Steam, Twitter, etc. ...
    Gamertag: Rooks
    - Don't add me, I'm at/near the friend limit :)

    Steam: JC_Rooks

    Twitter: http://twitter.com/JiunweiC

    I work on this: http://www.xbox.com
  • Psycho Internet HawkPsycho Internet Hawk Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Ziac45 wrote: »
    Yes and I'm sure the higher ups and such at Sony care so much about video games. The thing is the Other divisions/bosses at these company's don't care about video games. None of 'em do, it's all a means to an end normally that end is to make money. None of the big three are excluded you just seem to want to pin this purely on microsoft.

    how dare Microsoft try and make money, they should be making games out of the goodness of their hearts, like every other developer, ever.

    I'm not sure where people get the idea that because Microsoft to succeed as much as possible they are evil. It's not as though Sony or Nintendo, if they were to suddenly possess 95% of the market, would suddenly step back and say "Okay you guys, we're gonna stop making consoles now just to stop the sheer rape."

    Psycho Internet Hawk on
    ezek1t.jpg
  • RoshinRoshin My backlog can be seen from space SwedenRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I do think that I will eventually pick a wii up again....

    So why did you sell it, if you intend to pick one up again? It makes no sense to me.

    I don't think it's any surprise what has happened to the Wii. No one expected it to be such a huge hit and because of this, developers didn't really focus on it, at least not beyond the "make a lazy release and see if it sells" games. But now it's here and developers are busy changing their plans to include the Wii, which is going to see a ton of software in time, much like the DS.

    Anyone starved for entertainment in the meantime can amuse themselves with their 360 or by picking up old GameCube games, which are dead cheap now.

    Roshin on
    steam_sig.png
  • HorsecalledwarHorsecalledwar Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    as far selling it : at the time i sold it for more than i paid for it and I figured i might be waiting 10 months or more with the thing collecting dust so I opted to just sell it and use the money for some guitar gear.

    perhaps I could have held onto it - I'm trying to break the game collector habit not that anyone cares lmfao.

    Horsecalledwar on
    BALLS - Is coming home late after a night out with the guys, smelling of beer, lipstick on your collar, slapping your wife on the butt and having the balls to say: You're next, fatty.'
  • ArdeArde Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Nah, since you sold it more for what you paid for, it's a pretty good deal.
    You might want to try to get one before the holidays though since the big N games will be coming out.

    By that time, all the Platformer/FPS/fighter "core" players will be trying to get the Wii and with the casual players trying to get the Wii for the holidays, I can see a very severe shortage for the system in the holidays.

    Arde on
    Wii code:3004 5525 7274 3361
    XBL Gametag: mailarde

    Screen Digest LOL3RZZ
  • BamelinBamelin Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I've been thinking about getting a PS3. With the recent price drop combined with my desire for an Blu Ray or HD-DVD player it's very tempting.

    On the other hand the HDDVD add on from MS would probaly make more economical sense ... but I can't help but think that now is the time to get a PS3 ... while the price is abit lower and it still has the PS2 emotawhatever chip in it.

    Bamelin on
  • powersurgepowersurge Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Ugh looks like the PS3 version of Stranglehold just got delayed again :( I really want the PS3 version too for HD Hard Boiled.

    powersurge on
  • GuekGuek Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Zeromus wrote: »
    I get the feeling that the Wii interest might actually start to dwindle in the near future, especially when heavy-hitters start releasing for the PS3 (FFXIII, MGS4). While I wouldn't think it wise to overestimate the impact those games are going to have, I also don't think it's any better to underestimate how fast interest in the Wii is dropping with gamers.


    Speaking for myself I sold my Wii that I had bought at launch - got tired of waiting for a great game to come out. Before the flames start -- the Wii is feeling an awful lot like the N64 - I just don't get into buying all games with mario luigi wario - just not my bag.

    I do think that I will eventually pick a wii up again, for some type of kickass sword play component or lightsaber deal. And in all defense I did purchase about 6 wii games that I played off and on but couldnt justify keeping the system any longer - hell its been about 4 months and Im still waiting to see that mega title come out that I just got to have.

    From speaking to two other friends that purchased their wii's at launch they mirrored my sentiments fwiw.

    The PS3 isn't doing much better. The 360 wasn't so hot until about a year after launch too.

    This happens with every system, ever. After the initial launch rush, developers start looking towards the following holiday season, because that's usually when consumers start splurging, and after that there's the usual price drop to definatively push them into the mainstream.

    sometimes it feels like i'm the only person on these forums that's completely satisfied with their wii. *shrugs* i love that little thing.

    Guek on
  • elevatureelevature Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Guek wrote: »
    sometimes it feels like i'm the only person on these forums that's completely satisfied with their wii. *shrugs* i love that little thing.

    Make that two of us. I'm very happy with my wii, I've got enough games to keep me occupied until the next big releases come out, and I'm very excited about its potential. I think it was an excellent purchase.

    elevature on
  • OneEyedJackOneEyedJack Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    You guys must really like minigames.

    OneEyedJack on
    1089605-1.png?1281667433
  • slash000slash000 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    To say that the PS3's "heavy hitters" of this fall are going to bring it back up to speed in terms of sales is ridiculous.

    Because the other two systems have far more important heavy sales-hitting games coming out this year.

    slash000 on
  • GuekGuek Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    You guys must really like minigames.
    you must really be a dumbass.

    its more of a case of not minding well made ports. there are quite a few wii games that people berate as invalid gaming options because they're "ports." But that's just short changing yourself. Quite a few of those games are really well done and suit the wii's controller very well. The only "mini-game" centric title I have is warioware and that game is pure unmitigated awesome.

    that said, porting does really have to stop and thankfully it looks to be. everything thus far has only been to temporarily satiate my hunger for the holy trinity coming this winter. that is a feast my palate eagerly awaits.
    slash000 wrote: »
    To say that the PS3's "heavy hitters" of this fall are going to bring it back up to speed in terms of sales is ridiculous.

    Because the other two systems have far more important heavy sales-hitting games coming out this year.

    but they gots teh blu-ray...? and a higher price so they wont annoy customers :lol:

    edit: someone needs to make a game on strikers thread tomorrow. GET ON IT.

    Guek on
  • MinionOfCthulhuMinionOfCthulhu Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Guek wrote: »
    we can't be stopped!

    quick! someone start posting anime screen shots with loosely related subtitles that imply something obscene or reprehensible! GO!

    pancakesqu2.jpg

    MinionOfCthulhu on
    mgssig.jpg1152dt.gif
  • KlykaKlyka DO you have any SPARE BATTERIES?Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    wii-tan2_tn.jpg

    Klyka on
    SC2 EU ID Klyka.110
    lTDyp.jpg
  • jb7jb7 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Guek wrote: »
    we can't be stopped!

    quick! someone start posting anime screen shots with loosely related subtitles that imply something obscene or reprehensible! GO!

    pancakesqu2.jpg

    You disgust me.
    Klyka wrote: »
    pedo-anime

    Somehow I don't think Nintendo approves their name and their product's name being on there.

    jb7 on
  • GuekGuek Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    i take no responsibility for any of that


    ...*right click-save as*

    Guek on
  • EvangirEvangir Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    That is so very very wrong Klyka.
    Insert tasteless waggle joke here.

    Evangir on
    PSN/XBL/STEAM: Evangir - Starcraft 2: Bulwark.955 - Origin: Bulwark955 - Diablo 3: Bulwark#1478
  • KlykaKlyka DO you have any SPARE BATTERIES?Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    That is so very very wrong Klyka.
    Insert tasteless waggle joke here.

    Well, at least she is using protection.
    wrist strap!

    Klyka on
    SC2 EU ID Klyka.110
    lTDyp.jpg
  • MinionOfCthulhuMinionOfCthulhu Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    jb7 wrote: »
    Guek wrote: »
    we can't be stopped!

    quick! someone start posting anime screen shots with loosely related subtitles that imply something obscene or reprehensible! GO!

    pancakesqu2.jpg[IMG][/img]

    You disgust me.

    I apologize for nothing.

    MinionOfCthulhu on
    mgssig.jpg1152dt.gif
  • paco_pepepaco_pepe Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    hay guyz, has next gen started already? since sony hasnt confirmed it, just asking.

    paco_pepe on
    Paco+Pepper.png
  • GuekGuek Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    paco_pepe wrote: »
    hay guyz, has next gen started already? since sony hasnt confirmed it, just asking.

    we should send them a letter:

    Has the next gen started yet?
    [ ] confirm
    [ ] deny
    [ ] kutaragi

    Guek on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    paco_pepe wrote: »
    hay guyz, has next gen started already? since sony hasnt confirmed it, just asking.

    That is why the PS3 is doing so poorly; Sony forgot to say that the next gen has started.

    Couscous on
  • MinionOfCthulhuMinionOfCthulhu Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Klyka wrote: »
    Evangir wrote: »
    That is so very very wrong Klyka.
    Insert tasteless waggle joke here.

    Well, at least she is using protection.
    wrist strap!

    wiichansr5.jpg

    MinionOfCthulhu on
    mgssig.jpg1152dt.gif
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    paco_pepe wrote: »
    hay guyz, has next gen started already? since sony hasnt confirmed it, just asking.

    :^:

    I approve of this post.

    UnbreakableVow on
  • elevatureelevature Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    You guys must really like minigames.

    The only minigame-heavy wii game i own is Monkey Ball, and even that I play entirely single player. Between Zelda, Super Paper Mario, and RE4, I already have more games than I have time to play them, and those are all long single player quests.

    elevature on
  • jb7jb7 Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Maek moer hott wee gurl pic poast plz

    jb7 on
  • The WolfmanThe Wolfman Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    paco_pepe wrote: »
    hay guyz, has next gen started already? since sony hasnt confirmed it, just asking.

    With the way things keep progressing, I expect a press statement soon with them saying "Next gen doesn't begin until MGS4 and FFXIII come out, nyah."

    It's a common phrase uttered in every version of these threads. "Once MGS4 and FFXIII come out, you'll see". Well, guess there's nothing to do but sit back and enjoy the "ride" until then.

    The Wolfman on
    "The sausage of Green Earth explodes with flavor like the cannon of culinary delight."
  • Xenogears of BoreXenogears of Bore Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    If you ever get the chance to sell a system for more than you paid for it, by all means go for it. It does rub me the wrong way when someone buys a new system because they here it is awesome and then bemoan the lack of good games for it. Do some research before buying something. I knew what I was getting into when I bought my launch Wii, and also knew what I was getting into when I bought and sold three launch 360s. I got a whole lotta cake for those.

    Xenogears of Bore on
    3DS CODE: 3093-7068-3576
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    JCRooks wrote: »
    It's not cynical when you look at the way Microsoft has treated the PC market. Their gaming division comes off as a means to an end. Sure, the people working in the gaming division probably care about games, but, and this is clear when you look at the dead-end that was the XBox, the bottom line in how it plays in to their overall goal is all that matters when it comes to the rest of the company.
    This is starting to get off-topic, so I'll try to bring it back in line.

    Does it really matter to us gamers what the parent company's end goal is? Yes, it's pretty apparent that MS wants its software and services everywhere, and Sony wants its hardware everywhere, and Nintendo just wants to continue dominating in the games business (and it's making a ploy to casual/non-gamers to do so). It's a no brainer really. These are corporations, after all, trying to make a profit.

    In the meantime, if they end up providing games and services that we all enjoy and are willing to pay for, isn't that really what matters in the end?

    I know that Sony's using the PS3 to push Blu-ray, because it believes its good for their parent company overall. Personally, I don't like it because it pushes up the price of the PS3 quite a bit. That said, I'll still get one eventually (probably next year, MGS4 just looks too sweet to pass up). I don't think I have a moral responsibility to "punish" Sony just because they're doing what they think is good for their business. I may not agree with it personally, but I'm not a shareholder so I don't really care. All I see is a gaming machine with a lot of untapped potential.

    I love that every single time somebody levels a complaint against MS, some asshat like Psycho Internet Hawk will chime in with a retarded straw man. I have no problems with companies making money, as that is what they exist to do.

    Let's make a comparison. Who here doesn't like the way EA is treating football games? I expect the majority of people would answer a hearty "I don't!" to that question. Microsoft has been pulling shit just like that and worse in the PC world for the past two decades, and the trend isn't stopping. I want them out of the home console market because I've seen the way they've acted towards competitors and the way they treat their customers for years before, and it doesn't sit right with me that they're basically going to try and do the same thing here.

    Sony trying to corner the high-end AV market is old hat. They are offering up a media format, just like they did with Philips with the CD, but this time they've tacked it on to something in an effort to increase its saturation. At no point do they seem to want to put stringent limitations on anything involving the media, they just want to make a chunk of money when it's used.

    Look to Microsoft's historical dealings, however, and you notice patterns of shutting down competitors through force, increasingly restrictive computer use with stuff like the TCPA, shady liscensing deals with OS bundling, terrible support for its products, and a variety of other criticisms that can be easily levelled at them.

    I don't like them in the console business because of the way they've acted in the PC business, and as such, I don't think it's in this industry's best interests for the 360 to be a dominant power among the more hardcore gamers. I'm glad the Wii is incessantly propelled forward, but it does make me a bit sad that the PS3 is losing ground - and I recognize that Sony made its own bed - with much of the gaming community.

    Wonder_Hippie on
  • PingPongPingPong Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I know like, 6 people in my close group of friends with Wiis. I know 4 that had PS2s and 0 that have PS3s. *pointless observation*

    Let me just tell you, I might have read wrong, or misinterpreted, but whoever said that after awhile, casual gamers would get bored of the Wii and get a PS3/360, you're wrong. These "casual gamers" would like.. read a book instead. Sony in third place? Yes.

    I still hate them for the Lik Sang fiasco. Wtf. Yes, shut down a website for selling YOUR product to people who WANTED it.

    PingPong on
  • EvangirEvangir Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    JCRooks wrote: »
    It's not cynical when you look at the way Microsoft has treated the PC market. Their gaming division comes off as a means to an end. Sure, the people working in the gaming division probably care about games, but, and this is clear when you look at the dead-end that was the XBox, the bottom line in how it plays in to their overall goal is all that matters when it comes to the rest of the company.
    This is starting to get off-topic, so I'll try to bring it back in line.

    Does it really matter to us gamers what the parent company's end goal is? Yes, it's pretty apparent that MS wants its software and services everywhere, and Sony wants its hardware everywhere, and Nintendo just wants to continue dominating in the games business (and it's making a ploy to casual/non-gamers to do so). It's a no brainer really. These are corporations, after all, trying to make a profit.

    In the meantime, if they end up providing games and services that we all enjoy and are willing to pay for, isn't that really what matters in the end?

    I know that Sony's using the PS3 to push Blu-ray, because it believes its good for their parent company overall. Personally, I don't like it because it pushes up the price of the PS3 quite a bit. That said, I'll still get one eventually (probably next year, MGS4 just looks too sweet to pass up). I don't think I have a moral responsibility to "punish" Sony just because they're doing what they think is good for their business. I may not agree with it personally, but I'm not a shareholder so I don't really care. All I see is a gaming machine with a lot of untapped potential.

    I love that every single time somebody levels a complaint against MS, some asshat like Psycho Internet Hawk will chime in with a retarded straw man. I have no problems with companies making money, as that is what they exist to do.

    Let's make a comparison. Who here doesn't like the way EA is treating football games? I expect the majority of people would answer a hearty "I don't!" to that question. Microsoft has been pulling shit just like that and worse in the PC world for the past two decades, and the trend isn't stopping. I want them out of the home console market because I've seen the way they've acted towards competitors and the way they treat their customers for years before, and it doesn't sit right with me that they're basically going to try and do the same thing here.

    Sony trying to corner the high-end AV market is old hat. They are offering up a media format, just like they did with Philips with the CD, but this time they've tacked it on to something in an effort to increase its saturation. At no point do they seem to want to put stringent limitations on anything involving the media, they just want to make a chunk of money when it's used.

    Look to Microsoft's historical dealings, however, and you notice patterns of shutting down competitors through force, increasingly restrictive computer use with stuff like the TCPA, shady liscensing deals with OS bundling, terrible support for its products, and a variety of other criticisms that can be easily levelled at them.

    I don't like them in the console business because of the way they've acted in the PC business, and as such, I don't think it's in this industry's best interests for the 360 to be a dominant power among the more hardcore gamers. I'm glad the Wii is incessantly propelled forward, but it does make me a bit sad that the PS3 is losing ground - and I recognize that Sony made its own bed - with much of the gaming community.

    I'll just say one thing: All businesses, in a position of power in any market, act the same way. If Nintendo ends up with a monopoly in video gaming, you can bet they'll pull a Microsoft. That's the unfortunate reality of all monopolies. You act like only M$ (lolol) is evil enough to use underhanded business practices and shady deals; don't forget that Nintendo has a long history of doing the same. What you should be worried about is that any one manufacturer gains a monopoly on the market, not just if it's Microsoft.

    Evangir on
    PSN/XBL/STEAM: Evangir - Starcraft 2: Bulwark.955 - Origin: Bulwark955 - Diablo 3: Bulwark#1478
  • TexiKenTexiKen Dammit! That fish really got me!Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    The wii is doing just fine in my book. Found one in May, and while the only games that have really been above "mini games" (not to say those are bad by any means) have been Zelda, Sonic, and RE4, I have the VC to make up some wait. And with Mario Strikers coming out this week, with Metroid at month's end, it works perfectly.

    Shining Force and Paper Mario are now on the VC. That's more than enough time killing right now.

    So the whole Wii has no good games is relative to the person.

    TexiKen on
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Evangir wrote:
    I'll just say one thing: All businesses, in a position of power in any market, act the same way. If Nintendo ends up with a monopoly in video gaming, you can bet they'll pull a Microsoft. That's the unfortunate reality of all monopolies. You act like only M$ (lolol) is evil enough to use underhanded business practices and shady deals; don't forget that Nintendo has a long history of doing the same. What you should be worried about is that any one manufacturer gains a monopoly on the market, not just if it's Microsoft.

    I'm more concerned about what Microsoft's willing to do to get to where they want to go. The console gaming market is a stepping stone to them, and little else.

    Wonder_Hippie on
  • EvangirEvangir Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Evangir wrote:
    I'll just say one thing: All businesses, in a position of power in any market, act the same way. If Nintendo ends up with a monopoly in video gaming, you can bet they'll pull a Microsoft. That's the unfortunate reality of all monopolies. You act like only M$ (lolol) is evil enough to use underhanded business practices and shady deals; don't forget that Nintendo has a long history of doing the same. What you should be worried about is that any one manufacturer gains a monopoly on the market, not just if it's Microsoft.

    I'm more concerned about what Microsoft's willing to do to get to where they want to go. The console gaming market is a stepping stone to them, and little else.

    Probably the same things that Nintendo tried in the '90s. Just like all big corporations, Microsoft will often crush, maim, and destroy all in their path to accomplish their goals. Last I checked, Nintendo and Sony were also big corporations. So again, you should be worried if any manufacturer gains a monopoly in the market. Not just Microsoft.

    Evangir on
    PSN/XBL/STEAM: Evangir - Starcraft 2: Bulwark.955 - Origin: Bulwark955 - Diablo 3: Bulwark#1478
  • jungleroomxjungleroomx It's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovels Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Evangir wrote: »
    What you should be worried about is that any one manufacturer gains a monopoly on the market, not just if it's Microsoft.

    I'm glad someone knows what the deal is. I'm enjoying having 3 companies battle it out right now. If Sony had just decided to release the PS3 at $600 with no competition (Although a reasonable argument could be made they wouldn't have developed the Cell or packed in BluRay if there was no competition to begin with, but just for arguments sake let's assume they do), there wouldn't have been a price drop... or improved models... or a lower entry-point $499 PS3... or any of that good stuff.

    Same goes for any of the others.

    3-way competition is good.

    jungleroomx on
  • jungleroomxjungleroomx It's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovels Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Evangir wrote:
    I'll just say one thing: All businesses, in a position of power in any market, act the same way. If Nintendo ends up with a monopoly in video gaming, you can bet they'll pull a Microsoft. That's the unfortunate reality of all monopolies. You act like only M$ (lolol) is evil enough to use underhanded business practices and shady deals; don't forget that Nintendo has a long history of doing the same. What you should be worried about is that any one manufacturer gains a monopoly on the market, not just if it's Microsoft.

    I'm more concerned about what Microsoft's willing to do to get to where they want to go. The console gaming market is a stepping stone to them, and little else.

    The same goes for Sony, who (like Microsoft) has several product lines that sort-of relate to gaming, but not really.

    jungleroomx on
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    I'm all for healthy competition. I bought a Sega, Dreamcast, and PS3 before anything else in their respective generations partially because of that. I just don't want MS to stick around as a competitor because console gaming is incidental to them.

    Wonder_Hippie on
Sign In or Register to comment.