The Ceeb reports
on a study comparing the sensitivity of circumcised and uncircumcised penises:
The study found no difference in sensitivity to touch or pain between the two groups, debunking the widely-held belief that uncircumcised men experience greater sexual pleasure.
I'm against circumcision on the balance of things, but not on the basis of any supposed change in sensitivity. The medical risks and loss of choice are what do it for me. At the same time, I've never accepted the comparisons to female circumcision that are often brought up in the discussion, simply because the end result of the two procedures is so qualitatively different. Assuming the results are replicated, this study puts a serious nail in the coffin of such comparisons.
The real question, of course, is what all those people trying to "regrow" their foreskins are thinking right now. I'm gonna go with, "3 years of hanging weights off of the end of my dick, and now this?"
Your last sentence though made me want to hold you down and punch you in the fucking face, which makes me think that perhaps you have accidentally stepped over the line into a destructive mode of expressing yourself.