The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I'm thinking of buying a new video card, but my motherboard is so old it only takes AGP cards. I've heard that the GeForce 7800 GS is pretty solid, but if you guys have heard of any others, I'd love to hear about them.
Hard at work on this side,
Let the truth magnify,
Devils can't stop me,
But they damn sure try...
I have the x1950 Pro 512mb, which is pretty much the fastest available AGP card that there is.
It runs everything I've thrown at is.
I can run Oblivion with everything maxed at 1680x1050 widescreen resolution, and never drop below 20FPS (it only goes that low in the main city, outside of the city it runs VERY smooth, and in the dungeons, even smoother).
Of course, if the rest of your PC is also from 2002, then a fast videocard isn't going to do jack squat. You'll also need a fast processor, and fast/lots of ram.
You'd probably be better of getting an entirely new system.
I like how they tell you to dump your shitty ass AGP platform and upgrade if you want to spend over $200. I'm still rocking AGP but I guess I've been obselete'd.
They chamption the 7950GT but the X1950Pro is less than 5% slower in many benchmarks. The pro was meant to compete against the 7900gs but it was so fast they released an underclocked pro to the mid-range market, and called it the x1950gt. I ended up buying one, and I couldn't get the core to artificact when I stress tested and overclocked it. It was in the 700s (stock is 594) before it just lost display (probably a voltage issue, not a heat issue).
What this means is that you can get a x1950gt for a little over $100, overclock it to an x1950Pro on the stock cooler, which competes with the 7950GT, a $300 card.
I suggest a $90 USD GeForce 7600GS from newegg, or 100$CAD from NCIX.
my reasoning is that since you are stuck on AGP, you probably have a single core CPU and 512mb of ram and as such won't benefit from a better video card. (However, if you have a good dual-core CPU and 1GB of ram or more, get something better.)
If you don't play too many games, get an All in Wonder card from ATI's clearance center.
Currently, there's an All in Wonder Radeon 9600 for 80$ CAD. http://www.shopati.ca/product.asp?sku=3266888
That thing can watch TV.
Logicow on
0
Magus`The fun has been DOUBLED!Registered Userregular
edited August 2007
AGP was cut out way before it was necessary. Only the more recent cards would benefit from the increased bandwith of PCI-E and even then we're talking a 10-15% increase. When PCI-E originally came out the difference between cards on that and on AGP was non-existant.
While PCI-E did not improve much over AGP for transfer speed, it provides sufficient power to remove the need for additional molex connectors on AGP cards. Plus, it allows for SLI / Crossfire, although you need a motherboard that supports it.
And the later AGP cards from the GeForce 6 and 7 series and Radeon X000 and X1000 series cards are more than fast enough to be bottlenecked by the single core processors of the time.
AGP was cut out way before it was necessary. Only the more recent cards would benefit from the increased bandwith of PCI-E and even then we're talking a 10-15% increase. When PCI-E originally came out the difference between cards on that and on AGP was non-existant.
Blame greedy companies, I guess.
What shocked me is the totality of the PCIe takeover. AGP was made completely obsolete, yet people were buying new PCIe computers with the same CPU socket, and in some cases, the same video card. But everything else being equal, PCIe and AGP cards perform exactly the same.
The PCIe slot does provide extra power, but power consumption is getting so out of control that the next generation of video cards may be external and come with a power cord. Then everyone will have to buy PCIe 2.0.
AGP was cut out way before it was necessary. Only the more recent cards would benefit from the increased bandwith of PCI-E and even then we're talking a 10-15% increase. When PCI-E originally came out the difference between cards on that and on AGP was non-existant.
Blame greedy companies, I guess.
What shocked me is the totality of the PCIe takeover. AGP was made completely obsolete, yet people were buying new PCIe computers with the same CPU socket, and in some cases, the same video card. But everything else being equal, PCIe and AGP cards perform exactly the same.
The PCIe slot does provide extra power, but power consumption is getting so out of control that the next generation of video cards may be external and come with a power cord. Then everyone will have to buy PCIe 2.0.
At least it'll be a lot less hassle to install them.
And you could buy 1 card for multiple computers.
Ohtsam on
0
Zxerolfor the smaller pieces, my shovel wouldn't doso i took off my boot and used my shoeRegistered Userregular
AGP was cut out way before it was necessary. Only the more recent cards would benefit from the increased bandwith of PCI-E and even then we're talking a 10-15% increase. When PCI-E originally came out the difference between cards on that and on AGP was non-existant.
Blame greedy companies, I guess.
What shocked me is the totality of the PCIe takeover. AGP was made completely obsolete, yet people were buying new PCIe computers with the same CPU socket, and in some cases, the same video card. But everything else being equal, PCIe and AGP cards perform exactly the same.
The PCIe slot does provide extra power, but power consumption is getting so out of control that the next generation of video cards may be external and come with a power cord. Then everyone will have to buy PCIe 2.0.
the before mentioned Radeon x1950 is great, if you have the mobo and the processor to handle it.
personally, with my 2.4 P4 and 2.5gigs o'ram I use a Radeon x800XT and it does very well. older pixel shaders though, but it runs a lot of the important games (WoW, HL, Doom/Quake, Battlefield) like butter.
that's all I know on AGP. let it never become obsolete!
AGP was cut out way before it was necessary. Only the more recent cards would benefit from the increased bandwith of PCI-E and even then we're talking a 10-15% increase. When PCI-E originally came out the difference between cards on that and on AGP was non-existant.
Blame greedy companies, I guess.
What shocked me is the totality of the PCIe takeover. AGP was made completely obsolete, yet people were buying new PCIe computers with the same CPU socket, and in some cases, the same video card. But everything else being equal, PCIe and AGP cards perform exactly the same.
The PCIe slot does provide extra power, but power consumption is getting so out of control that the next generation of video cards may be external and come with a power cord. Then everyone will have to buy PCIe 2.0.
FSAA on the V5500, single and dual-chip configurations, molex power connectors long before anyone else thought of it... I'm telling you, even when 3dfx was doing things wrong, they were doing things right! What higher-performance graphics card today, in the same position as the V5500 was back then, isn't just as big? And everyone laughed at it when it first arrived... man, I loved those cards.
i know this is a hella nub question but every computer i've encountered has been PCI or PCI-E
Wow... not been using pc's long, have we?
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
You do realize that "man, they totally did molex power connectors first!!" isn't exactly a mark of honour, right?
Yes, but it was a sign of things to come, but nobody else thought of that when they were laughing at them!
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
0
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
You do realize that "man, they totally did molex power connectors first!!" isn't exactly a mark of honour, right?
Yes, but it was a sign of things to come, but nobody else thought of that when they were laughing at them!
"Technology makes things smaller, not bigger like that. Silly 3DFX."
Quite
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
You do realize that "man, they totally did molex power connectors first!!" isn't exactly a mark of honour, right?
Yes, but it was a sign of things to come, but nobody else thought of that when they were laughing at them!
Truly, noone else thought of it. We should feel proud of 3DFx for having pioneered oversized power-hungry cards in a time when technology did not actually demand it.
Seriously, passive aggression aside, using the wrong kind of technology isn't really something to applaud. SLI cards are still mostly worthless for the advantages they bring, and dualcore processors were only brought in because hardware hit the physical limit of how much you can clock it, not because it's superior to a single, faster chip. It's kind of like praising someone for sticking a loud fan on their CPU when their competition gets the same result with passive cooling.
[edit] Summary: they were laughed at because they had a monster card (ah ah) but offered little for it compared to the competition, not because the technology was Sparta.
You do realize that "man, they totally did molex power connectors first!!" isn't exactly a mark of honour, right?
Yes, but it was a sign of things to come, but nobody else thought of that when they were laughing at them!
Truly, noone else thought of it. We should feel proud of 3DFx for having pioneered oversized power-hungry cards in a time when technology did not actually demand it.
Seriously, passive aggression aside, using the wrong kind of technology isn't really something to applaud. SLI cards are still mostly worthless for the advantages they bring, and dualcore processors were only brought in because hardware hit the physical limit of how much you can clock it, not because it's superior to a single, faster chip. It's kind of like praising someone for sticking a loud fan on their CPU when their competition gets the same result with passive cooling.
[edit] Summary: they were laughed at because they had a monster card (ah ah) but offered little for it compared to the competition, not because the technology was Sparta.
Nono, I agree, I was just having a laugh. I did say they were doing things wrongly, didn't I? :P
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
I still loved my Voodoo5 5500 back when everyone was gushing over the new GeForce 2 GTS, though... and I don't think I've seen a card with better image quality since. And I remember going into GAME and buying a Voodoo3 3000 for £99 way back in the day, and having my jaw drop when I got it into my computer back home...
I do miss 3dfx. I really wish they could've stayed the course, despite their many fuck-ups. The Rampage was interesting, as was the Fear technology.
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
Being a member of the AGP club, i can attest to it still being a solid platform. In fact, my 3 year old PC is still chugging away and chewing through anything i throw at it. Granted i cant play the new games at maximum settings, but who really can unless they spend over $400 on a top of the line card.
Currently running and old 2600+ @ stock speed, 1 gig PC2700, nf7-s and an X800XT AIW card. It runs everything new just fine at medium to high settings with an acceptable frame rate, and older games it just destroys. So whats all this talk about you need a dual core chip and 2gigs plus ram? Do you really have any app or game thats multithreaded to take advantage of both those cores? Is your PC such a ram hog to think you NEED 2 gigs of ram?
Comon people. Streamline your shit and quite chucking FUD out there about AGP being obselete. It may be out dated now, but its certinly still a viable platform.
I am glad Glide died, though. It was awesome when you were getting crazy graphics and performance compared to DirectX and OpenGL, but when 3DFx went all "fuck you wrappers, we sue you! PAY FOR OUR KITS!" it was time to go.
Being a member of the AGP club, i can attest to it still being a solid platform. In fact, my 3 year old PC is still chugging away and chewing through anything i throw at it. Granted i cant play the new games at maximum settings, but who really can unless they spend over $400 on a top of the line card.
Currently running and old 2600+ @ stock speed, 1 gig PC2700, nf7-s and an X800XT AIW card. It runs everything new just fine at medium to high settings with an acceptable frame rate, and older games it just destroys. So whats all this talk about you need a dual core chip and 2gigs plus ram? Do you really have any app or game thats multithreaded to take advantage of both those cores? Is your PC such a ram hog to think you NEED 2 gigs of ram?
Comon people. Streamline your shit and quite chucking FUD out there about AGP being obselete. It may be out dated now, but its certinly still a viable platform.
No, I don't need a dual-core chip, 2GB of RAM and so on. But I had the money available, as I knew I wouldn't again for a long time, so I built myself a new pc. It's meant to last, so I got the best of everything available. However, it's not like my old pc and parts go in the bin... friends and family receive them, so they're still in use.
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
I am glad Glide died, though. It was awesome when you were getting crazy graphics and performance compared to DirectX and OpenGL, but when 3DFx went all "fuck you wrappers, we sue you! PAY FOR OUR KITS!" it was time to go.
Aw, I loved Glide... I still can't play Wheel of Time at the same level of detail with my GeForce 8800 GTS as I could with my Voodoo5 5500. Unless you know of a wrapper that will cover said card, as all the ones available, last time I checked (admittedly a long time ago) were for the Voodoo3 3000, and none of them were particularly good...
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
Being a member of the AGP club, i can attest to it still being a solid platform. In fact, my 3 year old PC is still chugging away and chewing through anything i throw at it. Granted i cant play the new games at maximum settings, but who really can unless they spend over $400 on a top of the line card.
Currently running and old 2600+ @ stock speed, 1 gig PC2700, nf7-s and an X800XT AIW card. It runs everything new just fine at medium to high settings with an acceptable frame rate, and older games it just destroys. So whats all this talk about you need a dual core chip and 2gigs plus ram? Do you really have any app or game thats multithreaded to take advantage of both those cores? Is your PC such a ram hog to think you NEED 2 gigs of ram?
Comon people. Streamline your shit and quite chucking FUD out there about AGP being obselete. It may be out dated now, but its certinly still a viable platform.
No, I don't need a dual-core chip, 2GB of RAM and so on. But I had the money available, as I knew I wouldn't again for a long time, so I built myself a new pc. It's meant to last, so I got the best of everything available. However, it's not like my old pc and parts go in the bin... friends and family receive them, so they're still in use.
Its one thing to get them because you can, but its a different story when people start spouting BS about how agp is dead and you need a dual core and a shit ton of ram to get any kind of performance. Its absurd!
Being a member of the AGP club, i can attest to it still being a solid platform. In fact, my 3 year old PC is still chugging away and chewing through anything i throw at it. Granted i cant play the new games at maximum settings, but who really can unless they spend over $400 on a top of the line card.
Currently running and old 2600+ @ stock speed, 1 gig PC2700, nf7-s and an X800XT AIW card. It runs everything new just fine at medium to high settings with an acceptable frame rate, and older games it just destroys. So whats all this talk about you need a dual core chip and 2gigs plus ram? Do you really have any app or game thats multithreaded to take advantage of both those cores? Is your PC such a ram hog to think you NEED 2 gigs of ram?
Comon people. Streamline your shit and quite chucking FUD out there about AGP being obselete. It may be out dated now, but its certinly still a viable platform.
No, I don't need a dual-core chip, 2GB of RAM and so on. But I had the money available, as I knew I wouldn't again for a long time, so I built myself a new pc. It's meant to last, so I got the best of everything available. However, it's not like my old pc and parts go in the bin... friends and family receive them, so they're still in use.
Its one thing to get them because you can, but its a different story when people start spouting BS about how agp is dead and you need a dual core and a shit ton of ram to get any kind of performance. Its absurd!
Oh, well, that is true. My Athlon64 3000+, 1GB PC2700 and Radeon X800 GTO ran every modern game at high enough settings, so I know this well enough.
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
Being a member of the AGP club, i can attest to it still being a solid platform. In fact, my 3 year old PC is still chugging away and chewing through anything i throw at it. Granted i cant play the new games at maximum settings, but who really can unless they spend over $400 on a top of the line card.
Currently running and old 2600+ @ stock speed, 1 gig PC2700, nf7-s and an X800XT AIW card. It runs everything new just fine at medium to high settings with an acceptable frame rate, and older games it just destroys. So whats all this talk about you need a dual core chip and 2gigs plus ram? Do you really have any app or game thats multithreaded to take advantage of both those cores? Is your PC such a ram hog to think you NEED 2 gigs of ram?
Comon people. Streamline your shit and quite chucking FUD out there about AGP being obselete. It may be out dated now, but its certinly still a viable platform.
No, I don't need a dual-core chip, 2GB of RAM and so on. But I had the money available, as I knew I wouldn't again for a long time, so I built myself a new pc. It's meant to last, so I got the best of everything available. However, it's not like my old pc and parts go in the bin... friends and family receive them, so they're still in use.
Its one thing to get them because you can, but its a different story when people start spouting BS about how agp is dead and you need a dual core and a shit ton of ram to get any kind of performance. Its absurd!
Oh, well, that is true. My Athlon64 3000+, 1GB PC2700 and Radeon X800 GTO ran every modern game at high enough settings, so I know this well enough.
And dont even get me started on people claiming you need a ridiculously high wattage power supply. My rage will grow exponentially. 500w is MORE than enough for 98% of the PC’s out there your retarded hairless chimps!
Has anyone actually gotten the chance to program with glide? I've only gotten into graphics programming in the past year, so it was way before my time.
I am glad Glide died, though. It was awesome when you were getting crazy graphics and performance compared to DirectX and OpenGL, but when 3DFx went all "fuck you wrappers, we sue you! PAY FOR OUR KITS!" it was time to go.
Aw, I loved Glide... I still can't play Wheel of Time at the same level of detail with my GeForce 8800 GTS as I could with my Voodoo5 5500. Unless you know of a wrapper that will cover said card, as all the ones available, last time I checked (admittedly a long time ago) were for the Voodoo3 3000, and none of them were particularly good...
There've been quite a few of them, and some commercial ones, but I'm really not on top of what's the best one today. The only Glide game I'm playing at the moment is Hexen II, and that one just requires you to erase opengl32.dll to work on system OpenGL.
But of course, why settle for original when you can improve with things like anisotropic filtering, bumpmapping and bloom? Mmm, purdy.
The 7600GT is probably the best bang for the buck for AGP. I wouldn't spend more money than that on a solution that's 33% into buying a whole new system with PCIx16. I have one and it runs everything reasonably well. I was playing the World in Conflict beta like a champ, 1280x1024 at mid/high settings. No visible framerate slowdown or spikes.
I've got the AGP evga 7600 OC Superclock. the thing makes my otherwise un-upgraded 2005 computer a better gaming rig than a lot of brand new pcs. It comes HIGHLY recommended.
My AGP computer can't really play demanding games anymore. I blame the slow processor and lack of ram. The video card itself can handle everything though.
AMD Sempron 2500+, 512mb ram, Radeon X800XL.
As for glide, I don't like it, if only because it only ran on 3dfx cards and wasn't open for everyone to use.
My AGP computer can't really play demanding games anymore. I blame the slow processor and lack of ram. The video card itself can handle everything though.
AMD Sempron 2500+, 512mb ram, Radeon X800XL.
As for glide, I don't like it, if only because it only ran on 3dfx cards and wasn't open for everyone to use.
Well I think it was because glide purposefully didn't have a level of abstraction that openGL and direct3d did at the time. Back when video cards weren't that powerful, having the overhead of an abstraction layer allowing an API to be used on any card was sometimes just too slow, so glide gave more specific, low level access to 3dfx hardware. That kind of thing wouldn't have been easy for everyone to use.
I have the x1950 Pro 512mb, which is pretty much the fastest available AGP card that there is.
It runs everything I've thrown at is.
I can run Oblivion with everything maxed at 1680x1050 widescreen resolution, and never drop below 20FPS (it only goes that low in the main city, outside of the city it runs VERY smooth, and in the dungeons, even smoother).
Of course, if the rest of your PC is also from 2002, then a fast videocard isn't going to do jack squat. You'll also need a fast processor, and fast/lots of ram.
You'd probably be better of getting an entirely new system.
This is probably the best choice. However, it has obscene power requirements, and if you don't have a really good Power Supply already (generally something 600W or greater will have the required voltage on the rails) then you will be spending at least $150 on a new PSU and just as much on the card itself. If you don't, you run the risk of the card or even the PSU dying.
So again, best bet, save up your cash and get a newer system, instead of sinking money into an older one that can only last so long.
MuddBudd on
There's no plan, there's no race to be run
The harder the rain, honey, the sweeter the sun.
My AGP computer can't really play demanding games anymore. I blame the slow processor and lack of ram. The video card itself can handle everything though.
AMD Sempron 2500+, 512mb ram, Radeon X800XL.
As for glide, I don't like it, if only because it only ran on 3dfx cards and wasn't open for everyone to use.
honestly your ram is the only real thing holding you back. throw in another 512 and you'll see a world of difference.
I have the x1950 Pro 512mb, which is pretty much the fastest available AGP card that there is.
It runs everything I've thrown at is.
I can run Oblivion with everything maxed at 1680x1050 widescreen resolution, and never drop below 20FPS (it only goes that low in the main city, outside of the city it runs VERY smooth, and in the dungeons, even smoother).
Of course, if the rest of your PC is also from 2002, then a fast videocard isn't going to do jack squat. You'll also need a fast processor, and fast/lots of ram.
You'd probably be better of getting an entirely new system.
This is probably the best choice. However, it has obscene power requirements, and if you don't have a really good Power Supply already (generally something 600W or greater will have the required voltage on the rails) then you will be spending at least $150 on a new PSU and just as much on the card itself. If you don't, you run the risk of the card or even the PSU dying.
So again, best bet, save up your cash and get a newer system, instead of sinking money into an older one that can only last so long.
i'll overlook the statement of a 600w power supply. Must avoid getting angry. :x
Posts
where does this AGP fit in?
oh and to answer your question
http://www.gpureview.com/superlatives.php?PHPSESSID=02c64ffa58457aa7ca0c292ce1b49469
It only has one AGP slot and like 4 PCI slots.
Let the truth magnify,
Devils can't stop me,
But they damn sure try...
-Mos Def
Totally useless.
[Edit] Glock just save up and get a new rig. New mobo and processor should do you fine.
I liked it a lot
It runs everything I've thrown at is.
I can run Oblivion with everything maxed at 1680x1050 widescreen resolution, and never drop below 20FPS (it only goes that low in the main city, outside of the city it runs VERY smooth, and in the dungeons, even smoother).
Of course, if the rest of your PC is also from 2002, then a fast videocard isn't going to do jack squat. You'll also need a fast processor, and fast/lots of ram.
You'd probably be better of getting an entirely new system.
XBL: UnderHero5
Steam/PSN: UnderHero5
They chamption the 7950GT but the X1950Pro is less than 5% slower in many benchmarks. The pro was meant to compete against the 7900gs but it was so fast they released an underclocked pro to the mid-range market, and called it the x1950gt. I ended up buying one, and I couldn't get the core to artificact when I stress tested and overclocked it. It was in the 700s (stock is 594) before it just lost display (probably a voltage issue, not a heat issue).
What this means is that you can get a x1950gt for a little over $100, overclock it to an x1950Pro on the stock cooler, which competes with the 7950GT, a $300 card.
my reasoning is that since you are stuck on AGP, you probably have a single core CPU and 512mb of ram and as such won't benefit from a better video card. (However, if you have a good dual-core CPU and 1GB of ram or more, get something better.)
If you don't play too many games, get an All in Wonder card from ATI's clearance center.
Currently, there's an All in Wonder Radeon 9600 for 80$ CAD.
http://www.shopati.ca/product.asp?sku=3266888
That thing can watch TV.
Blame greedy companies, I guess.
Steam Profile | Signature art by Alexandra 'Lexxy' Douglass
And the later AGP cards from the GeForce 6 and 7 series and Radeon X000 and X1000 series cards are more than fast enough to be bottlenecked by the single core processors of the time.
The PCIe slot does provide extra power, but power consumption is getting so out of control that the next generation of video cards may be external and come with a power cord. Then everyone will have to buy PCIe 2.0.
At least it'll be a lot less hassle to install them.
And you could buy 1 card for multiple computers.
personally, with my 2.4 P4 and 2.5gigs o'ram I use a Radeon x800XT and it does very well. older pixel shaders though, but it runs a lot of the important games (WoW, HL, Doom/Quake, Battlefield) like butter.
that's all I know on AGP. let it never become obsolete!
FSAA on the V5500, single and dual-chip configurations, molex power connectors long before anyone else thought of it... I'm telling you, even when 3dfx was doing things wrong, they were doing things right! What higher-performance graphics card today, in the same position as the V5500 was back then, isn't just as big? And everyone laughed at it when it first arrived... man, I loved those cards.
Wow... not been using pc's long, have we?
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
Yes, but it was a sign of things to come, but nobody else thought of that when they were laughing at them!
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
"Technology makes things smaller, not bigger like that. Silly 3DFX."
Quite
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
Seriously, passive aggression aside, using the wrong kind of technology isn't really something to applaud. SLI cards are still mostly worthless for the advantages they bring, and dualcore processors were only brought in because hardware hit the physical limit of how much you can clock it, not because it's superior to a single, faster chip. It's kind of like praising someone for sticking a loud fan on their CPU when their competition gets the same result with passive cooling.
[edit] Summary: they were laughed at because they had a monster card (ah ah) but offered little for it compared to the competition, not because the technology was Sparta.
Nono, I agree, I was just having a laugh. I did say they were doing things wrongly, didn't I? :P
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
I do miss 3dfx. I really wish they could've stayed the course, despite their many fuck-ups. The Rampage was interesting, as was the Fear technology.
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
Currently running and old 2600+ @ stock speed, 1 gig PC2700, nf7-s and an X800XT AIW card. It runs everything new just fine at medium to high settings with an acceptable frame rate, and older games it just destroys. So whats all this talk about you need a dual core chip and 2gigs plus ram? Do you really have any app or game thats multithreaded to take advantage of both those cores? Is your PC such a ram hog to think you NEED 2 gigs of ram?
Comon people. Streamline your shit and quite chucking FUD out there about AGP being obselete. It may be out dated now, but its certinly still a viable platform.
No, I don't need a dual-core chip, 2GB of RAM and so on. But I had the money available, as I knew I wouldn't again for a long time, so I built myself a new pc. It's meant to last, so I got the best of everything available. However, it's not like my old pc and parts go in the bin... friends and family receive them, so they're still in use.
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
Aw, I loved Glide... I still can't play Wheel of Time at the same level of detail with my GeForce 8800 GTS as I could with my Voodoo5 5500. Unless you know of a wrapper that will cover said card, as all the ones available, last time I checked (admittedly a long time ago) were for the Voodoo3 3000, and none of them were particularly good...
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
Its one thing to get them because you can, but its a different story when people start spouting BS about how agp is dead and you need a dual core and a shit ton of ram to get any kind of performance. Its absurd!
Oh, well, that is true. My Athlon64 3000+, 1GB PC2700 and Radeon X800 GTO ran every modern game at high enough settings, so I know this well enough.
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
And dont even get me started on people claiming you need a ridiculously high wattage power supply. My rage will grow exponentially. 500w is MORE than enough for 98% of the PC’s out there your retarded hairless chimps!
But of course, why settle for original when you can improve with things like anisotropic filtering, bumpmapping and bloom? Mmm, purdy.
I miss the days of Voodoo2's, glide, and SLI being worth a damn.
I do kick myself for not upgrading to a PCI-E system back when I had the chance. But it was all about how much $$$ I had at the time.
AMD Sempron 2500+, 512mb ram, Radeon X800XL.
As for glide, I don't like it, if only because it only ran on 3dfx cards and wasn't open for everyone to use.
Well I think it was because glide purposefully didn't have a level of abstraction that openGL and direct3d did at the time. Back when video cards weren't that powerful, having the overhead of an abstraction layer allowing an API to be used on any card was sometimes just too slow, so glide gave more specific, low level access to 3dfx hardware. That kind of thing wouldn't have been easy for everyone to use.
This is probably the best choice. However, it has obscene power requirements, and if you don't have a really good Power Supply already (generally something 600W or greater will have the required voltage on the rails) then you will be spending at least $150 on a new PSU and just as much on the card itself. If you don't, you run the risk of the card or even the PSU dying.
So again, best bet, save up your cash and get a newer system, instead of sinking money into an older one that can only last so long.
The harder the rain, honey, the sweeter the sun.
honestly your ram is the only real thing holding you back. throw in another 512 and you'll see a world of difference.
i'll overlook the statement of a 600w power supply. Must avoid getting angry. :x