Is using sloganizer.net sigs now jailable? If so I would like it posted in the rules, as I just got jailed for having one of Sloganizer's sigs, while other people go free with the exact same sig:http://www.penny-arcade.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=183630
edit: Pheezer clarified that it is not appropiate in G&T. Sorry for the hoopla.
Max Evans & Liz Parker
Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
Shouldn't there be some kind of universal signature size?
Wii: 5024 6786 2934 2806 | Steam/XBL: Arcibi | FFXI: Arcibi / Bahamut
Also, I know Bone Daddy as said in my edit from before: Pheezer clarified that it is not appropiate in G&T. Sorry for the hoopla.
These are their extra-large sigs:
Trying to take that away would result in a shitstorm of epic proportions.
This is se++ without sigs: |OOOOOOOOO-| 9/10
How about we give G&T 70 extra pixels simply for the sake of uniformity?
I for one am tired of all of you conformists! Myrmidons lining up to go blindly to the slaughter.
This used to be a thinking man's forum. Shitcock and lol steam lol used to have subtext, meaning and cultural signifigance. Now we are squabbling about hairstyles and who has the nicest clothes.
I have the nicest clothes.
I am the Pretty Pretty Princess.
No. Much like in Kerome's proposed "standardized rules for everybody!" scenario, the standard would be the more conservative rules, not the more liberal ones.
Fine, take 35px from SE and give it to G&T. He's right in that it's stupid to have multiple acceptable sig dimensions on the same forums. They should either be made the same forum-wide or allow us to have the option of two sigs: One for G&T; one for SE.
And how about the rest of us, who perhaps by some freak accident involving hard radiation, a box of matches and a small jar of out-of-date coffee grounds, happen to enjoy posting in multiple forums and don't care to observe a frankly ridiculous number of regulations surrounding one minor point of forum culture?
I swear to god, we should have left sigs broken :x
Because it's absolutely ridiculous to expect people clever enough to operate their computers without getting electrical burns on their genitals to either remember to uncheck their sig box or adhere to the 80 pix rule if they post in the on-topic forums as well as SE? Is it also stupid to have multiple standards of behavior on the same forums?
I know the extra click is a lot of work, and remembering to do it is even more work...but, uh, yeah.
Edit: Bone Daddy is way faster than I am.
Also there are plenty of sloganizer sigs that are well within the limit of all sections. Of course none of those have the outline of a female's ass and I know how desperately one needs to proclaim their virility so...
For the last time: If you post in any section of the board as well as SE, you should change your sig size to the G&T limit. It's really not that hard and places the onus squarely on your shoulders. One would think that would be empowering yet every so often there is whining. This is something I do not understand.
"I didn't know it there was a difference"
Know you do. Move on.
"But that's not fair"
Sure it is. You just have to be more aware. In fact, it is unfair to take privileges away from the competent because you aren't.
"Now everyone is laughing at me."
They weren't until you made this thread.
"I hate myself and want to die!"
It's ok Bucky. You're going to get a date to the prom.
No. I was merely being facetious. Adjusting sig sizes by 35pixels is just as conformist as adjusting sig sizes by 70 pixels. I was joking.
FWIW, my sig is even smaller than the restrictions placed upon us in G&T, so I really don't care either way.
I've been trying to reach you, but your extension cord doesn't reach that far.
That actually made me chuckle IRL.
ha I knew it