In late 2004/early 2005, Electronic Arts(EA)
made a bid to buy an almost 20% stake in publisher UbiSoft. Understandably, UbiSoft feared a hostile takeover by one of its biggest rivals. A move to merge the two companies together would greatly benefit EA who hasn't had great success developing anything other than sports games. Initially Ubisoft expressed great concern about a potential takeover, especially since that stock purchase gave EA considerable voting rights, approximately 18% voting interest.
While it isn't abnormal for companies to invest in other companies via stock purchases, it raises a lot of eyebrows when a company buys stock in a competitor. When
Microsoft made an investment in Apple in the late 90's, there were lots of questions to be answered and that was for a purchase of non-voting stock.
In the last few days, it has been reported that
EA now has voting rights even greater than the founders of the company. This essentially means that EA has greater influence on the activities of UbiSoft's board. Of course, they have gone on record as saying that they had no intention of nominating anyone to the board, but reserved the right to do so.
It is going to be very interesting to see how these events play out in this generation of games. If EA continues to be weak at developing its own intellectual property (IP), they have enough cash and influence on UbiSoft's board to take over.
Should UbiSoft be concerned with these developments? Analysts are saying
not to worry, but if I were one of the original founders, I would start looking for a
big dog to get the fox out the henhouse.
Posts
Hmm. That would be interesting. EA and Ubisoft have really been pushing the Wii, and if MS were to take power within Ubi, I wonder if they'd use it as a front for making profits off of Wii software as well.
I just had a mental image of an Ubisoft Board Meeting, and some EA suit with a pointy beard at the table rubbing his hands together every time a point is made and saying "Veeeeerrrrryyyyy Innnnntttteeerrrreeestttiiinnngggg"
According to gamesindustry.biz the French government could not influence the situation.
DICE developed the Battlefield Series, Maxis developed the Sims series, any other titles I can think of were based on movie licenses like Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings and James Bond, the Medal of Honor shooters and the Def Jam fighting games.
I may be wrong but the only new IP developed at Electronic Arts were Black and Spore. However, there has been a lot of press about new titles like Army of Two, Boogie, Crysis and Skate.
A lot of these titles were successful but not as successful as Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six and Prince of Persia.
Where do Ubisoft rank these days in the top publishers list? I was under the impression that they've been getting bigger and bigger. I'd rather they dominate the industry than EA - they come out with a lot of great games.
Edit: I can't find it, it musta been someone else...