The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Friend or Foe? EA and UbiSoft

supergg2ksupergg2k Registered User regular
edited August 2007 in Games and Technology
In late 2004/early 2005, Electronic Arts(EA) made a bid to buy an almost 20% stake in publisher UbiSoft. Understandably, UbiSoft feared a hostile takeover by one of its biggest rivals. A move to merge the two companies together would greatly benefit EA who hasn't had great success developing anything other than sports games. Initially Ubisoft expressed great concern about a potential takeover, especially since that stock purchase gave EA considerable voting rights, approximately 18% voting interest.

While it isn't abnormal for companies to invest in other companies via stock purchases, it raises a lot of eyebrows when a company buys stock in a competitor. When Microsoft made an investment in Apple in the late 90's, there were lots of questions to be answered and that was for a purchase of non-voting stock.

In the last few days, it has been reported that EA now has voting rights even greater than the founders of the company. This essentially means that EA has greater influence on the activities of UbiSoft's board. Of course, they have gone on record as saying that they had no intention of nominating anyone to the board, but reserved the right to do so.

It is going to be very interesting to see how these events play out in this generation of games. If EA continues to be weak at developing its own intellectual property (IP), they have enough cash and influence on UbiSoft's board to take over.

Should UbiSoft be concerned with these developments? Analysts are saying not to worry, but if I were one of the original founders, I would start looking for a big dog to get the fox out the henhouse.

supergg2k on

Posts

  • HadjiQuestHadjiQuest Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    supergg2k wrote: »
    In late 2004/early 2005, Electronic Arts(EA) made a bid to buy an almost 20% stake in publisher UbiSoft. Understandably, UbiSoft feared a hostile takeover by one of its biggest rivals. A move to merge the two companies together would greatly benefit EA who hasn't had great success developing anything other than sports games. Initially Ubisoft expressed great concern about a potential takeover, especially since that stock purchase gave EA considerable voting rights, approximately 18% voting interest.

    While it isn't abnormal for companies to invest in other companies via stock purchases, it raises a lot of eyebrows when a company buys stock in a competitor. When Microsoft made an investment in Apple in the late 90's, there were lots of questions to be answered and that was for a purchase of non-voting stock.

    In the last few days, it has been reported that EA now has voting rights even greater than the founders of the company. This essentially means that EA has greater influence on the activities of UbiSoft's board. Of course, they have gone on record as saying that they had no intention of nominating anyone to the board, but reserved the right to do so.

    It is going to be very interesting to see how these events play out in this generation of games. If EA continues to be weak at developing its own intellectual property (IP), they have enough cash and influence on UbiSoft's board to take over.

    Should UbiSoft be concerned with these developments? Analysts are saying not to worry, but if I were one of the original founders, I would start looking for a big dog to get the fox out the henhouse.

    Hmm. That would be interesting. EA and Ubisoft have really been pushing the Wii, and if MS were to take power within Ubi, I wonder if they'd use it as a front for making profits off of Wii software as well.

    HadjiQuest on
  • Black IceBlack Ice Charlotte, NCRegistered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I have to disagree with the "EA who hasn't had great success developing anything other than sports games" piece. What about Battlefield? I'd call that a great success. Their sports games are examples of phenomenal success though. I've never really seen games reach such large groups of non-gamers with the exception of the Wii.. and that's a console.

    Black Ice on
  • DroolDrool Science! AustinRegistered User regular
    edited August 2007
    To be fair DICE developed BF, EA pubilshes it.

    Drool on
  • AccualtAccualt Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I'd be worried if I was Ubisoft. If nothing else EA gets to sit in on Ubisoft's board meetings...meetings where future plans and strategies for the company are discussed.

    Accualt on
  • BamelinBamelin Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Accualt wrote: »
    I'd be worried if I was Ubisoft. If nothing else EA gets to sit in on Ubisoft's board meetings...meetings where future plans and strategies for the company are discussed.

    I just had a mental image of an Ubisoft Board Meeting, and some EA suit with a pointy beard at the table rubbing his hands together every time a point is made and saying "Veeeeerrrrryyyyy Innnnntttteeerrrreeestttiiinnngggg"

    Bamelin on
  • AccualtAccualt Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Didn't the French government do something to ensure EA could not pull off a hostile takeover of Ubisoft last time EA bought a bunch of stock?

    Accualt on
  • supergg2ksupergg2k Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Accualt wrote: »
    Didn't the French government do something to ensure EA could not pull off a hostile takeover of Ubisoft last time EA bought a bunch of stock?

    According to gamesindustry.biz the French government could not influence the situation.
    The fiercely independent French firm hotly denounced the acquisition as "hostile", which only sent speculation over EA's intentions into overdrive. Fearful of losing control over their resurgent firm, the Guillemot family openly discussed a variety of strategies to prevent EA from gaining a controlling stake.

    French government intervention was mooted, as were a variety of "poison pill" strategies - which would have seen the firm performing quick mergers with subsidiaries such as mobile game publisher GameLoft, in order to render its stock less attractive for hostile takeover.

    supergg2k on
  • supergg2ksupergg2k Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Black Ice wrote: »
    I have to disagree with the "EA who hasn't had great success developing anything other than sports games" piece. What about Battlefield? I'd call that a great success. Their sports games are examples of phenomenal success though. I've never really seen games reach such large groups of non-gamers with the exception of the Wii.. and that's a console.

    DICE developed the Battlefield Series, Maxis developed the Sims series, any other titles I can think of were based on movie licenses like Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings and James Bond, the Medal of Honor shooters and the Def Jam fighting games.

    I may be wrong but the only new IP developed at Electronic Arts were Black and Spore. However, there has been a lot of press about new titles like Army of Two, Boogie, Crysis and Skate.

    A lot of these titles were successful but not as successful as Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six and Prince of Persia.

    supergg2k on
  • ÆthelredÆthelred Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I'll be damned if they make Rayman American!

    Where do Ubisoft rank these days in the top publishers list? I was under the impression that they've been getting bigger and bigger. I'd rather they dominate the industry than EA - they come out with a lot of great games.

    Æthelred on
    pokes: 1505 8032 8399
  • HoukHouk Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    edited August 2007
    I'll be damned if they make Rayman American!

    Where do Ubisoft rank these days in the top publishers list? I was under the impression that they've been getting bigger and bigger. I'd rather they dominate the industry than EA - they come out with a lot of great games.
    as mentioned above, they have all the tom clancey games, they have far cry, brothers in arms; upcoming theyve got that naruto game, assassin's creed, haze, etc. etc. they've gotta be pretty friggin big.

    Houk on
  • BurtletoyBurtletoy Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Wasn't there a thread a month or two back about them posting better sales that EA in a month or possibly a quarter?

    Edit: I can't find it, it musta been someone else...

    Burtletoy on
Sign In or Register to comment.