The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
It's amusing, and points out the fact that God would be convicted of crimes against humanity if He wasn't omni-everything, but what's the point? Isn't suing God in the US a sure way to commit political suicide?
I thought he was actually trying to make a point about frivolous lawsuits, not about an actual attack on religion. In Nebraska, attacking religion like that would be political suicide.
Maybe he's trying to apply reverse psychology? Like, people will think he really hates God, but then they won't believe that and instead vote for him because they suspect he secretly loves God.
Yeah, it looks like the point wasn't actually against God, though I wish so bad that it had been.
Here in Nebraska, though, there is a shockingly nonexistent sense of humor about things pertaining to God.
Chambers has long been known to be the "nontraditional" senator; even if you click on his name in the article, his profile shows him wearing a blue t-shirt -- pretty much his uniform in all things official, even when walking around our capitol building.
I don't know the details that pertain to lawsuits, but I do think the populous in general has become frivolous with their use of the court system when there are legit cases that should be processed more quickly than they can be (ex: my roommate crashed her car with a BAC of 2.3 or something of the sort on August 1st, and she's had her preliminary hearing, but won't be sentenced [or whatever] until October 15th. Take that license away already!)
With all the destruction that's been classed as an "act of God", I'd say that anti-terror legislation might be appropriate. He's like Bin Laden, sitting in a place nobody can find, occasionally sending out messages on cheese toasties or underpass walls to let people know that he isn't dead yet.
Except without that last part! At least Bin Laden's around to point at, instead of anyone who essentially says, "A magic man done it?"
(Medopine, yeah, that rascally decimal point. And seriously! I don't care about you people suing over banal shit, there's actual people out there who need the courts)
I'm not sure our legal system is the best place for an elaborate show of satire.
Drez on
Switch: SW-7690-2320-9238Steam/PSN/Xbox: Drezdar
0
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
edited September 2007
I saw this guy on CNN last week and, astoundingly, his point is that the furor over frivolous suits is retarded, that seeking recompense in a court of law is a fundamental right, and we should leave the decision of whether a case has merit to the judge who has heard the arguments rather than the court of public opinion.
I applaud his ideals but man he chose the worst way to go about it. The talk on CNN went something like this:
Bobblehead: So you're upset about all these frivolous lawsuit -
Guy: No, that's it. I'm upset that people call them frivolous without all the facts.
Bobblehead: ?????
Guy: So I'm doing this to make a point.
Bobblehead: That frivolous suits are bad.
Guy: No, my point is that the system works and if my suit has no merit the judge will throw it out.
Bobblehead: So we need laws to defend against frivolous suits.
Guy: No, we don't need those laws. People should be able to sue whoever.
Bobblehead: So your point is that you don't like frivolous suits.
Guy: RAAAAAAAGH
It's amusing, and points out the fact that God would be convicted of crimes against humanity if He wasn't omni-everything, but what's the point? Isn't suing God in the US a sure way to commit political suicide?
Chambers filed the suit to make a point that the state constitution allows lawsuits to be filed for any reason, according to WOWT.
Posts
Edit: But I would also have a hearty judge-chuckle. Ho ho ho.
Here in Nebraska, though, there is a shockingly nonexistent sense of humor about things pertaining to God.
Chambers has long been known to be the "nontraditional" senator; even if you click on his name in the article, his profile shows him wearing a blue t-shirt -- pretty much his uniform in all things official, even when walking around our capitol building.
I don't know the details that pertain to lawsuits, but I do think the populous in general has become frivolous with their use of the court system when there are legit cases that should be processed more quickly than they can be (ex: my roommate crashed her car with a BAC of 2.3 or something of the sort on August 1st, and she's had her preliminary hearing, but won't be sentenced [or whatever] until October 15th. Take that license away already!)
....frey Jones.
With all the destruction that's been classed as an "act of God", I'd say that anti-terror legislation might be appropriate. He's like Bin Laden, sitting in a place nobody can find, occasionally sending out messages on cheese toasties or underpass walls to let people know that he isn't dead yet.
(Medopine, yeah, that rascally decimal point. And seriously! I don't care about you people suing over banal shit, there's actual people out there who need the courts)
I applaud his ideals but man he chose the worst way to go about it. The talk on CNN went something like this:
Bobblehead: So you're upset about all these frivolous lawsuit -
Guy: No, that's it. I'm upset that people call them frivolous without all the facts.
Bobblehead: ?????
Guy: So I'm doing this to make a point.
Bobblehead: That frivolous suits are bad.
Guy: No, my point is that the system works and if my suit has no merit the judge will throw it out.
Bobblehead: So we need laws to defend against frivolous suits.
Guy: No, we don't need those laws. People should be able to sue whoever.
Bobblehead: So your point is that you don't like frivolous suits.
Guy: RAAAAAAAGH
---on and on and on for like five minutes.
Solved!
First sketch comic!