The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Scientists Deliver 'God' Via A Helmet

We R DNAWe R DNA __BANNED USERS regular
edited October 2007 in Debate and/or Discourse
Scientific American is reporting on scientific work done to map the euphoric religious feelings within the brain. As a result, it's now quite possible to experience 'proximity to God' via a special helmet: 'In a series of studies conducted over the past several decades, Persinger and his team have trained their device on the temporal lobes of hundreds of people. In doing so, the researchers induced in most of them the experience of a sensed presence — a feeling that someone (or a spirit) is in the room when no one, in fact, is — or of a profound state of cosmic bliss that reveals a universal truth. During the three-minute bursts of stimulation, the affected subjects translated this perception of the divine into their own cultural and religious language — terming it God, Buddha, a benevolent presence or the wonder of the universe."

More info on the God Simulator

I'd rather this didn't turn into a religion thread, as they seem to have been maggoty here lately. But I think these kinds of scientific inquiries bring to light interesting questions.

For one, what the hell is the evolutionary point of being able to experience these kinds of states at all? Why would we all have a hardwired 'God Spot' that allows us to experience these states of religious awe?

Secondly, monks who enter these deep trances without the aid of MRI-based equipment seem to capable of amazing feats of control over autonomic bodily processes. (eg: sitting at the bottom of a pool for half an hour by slowing their heart rate.) Do you think it would be possible to train someone to develop a similar level of control through use of one of these devices? Would you sign up for a class?

Finally... did someone just invent an Enlightenment Machine?

We R DNA on
«1345

Posts

  • DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    So, uh, science can now be the path to God?

    The God Spot was one of the few last remaining arguments that could be put forth as evidence that humans are naturally religiously-inclined.

    And now science can replicate it?

    I think I am going to be the first of many to say, uh... holy shit

    Dhalphir on
  • devoirdevoir Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    From an evolutionary standpoint, in unenlightened times someone who for all intents and purposes appeared to be mainlining God would probably have been seen as a chosen one/prophet/etc. People of such regard tend to be kept around and well fed, leading to a greater chance to mate and reproduce.

    devoir on
  • edited October 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    The very fact that meditating Buddhists had the same brain signatures as devout praying Christians was already proof enough that it was not a sign of (upper-case 'g') God interacting with humans.

    I can go to a fancy spa and get one goddamn awesome back massage and probably light up the same parts of my brain.

    DarkPrimus on
  • The CatThe Cat Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited October 2007
    I remember reading about this work a long while back. Of course everyone responded with "but it's not the same".

    But more seriously, it's not really a "god spot". As people have pointed out, the common thing that happens in religion threads is people insisting they believe in god because they had a religious experience and that it "just hasn't happened for atheist folks", whereas the reality is probably more along the lines that you interpret the experience through whichever lens you put over it - rarely if ever does a person in an Islamic culture have a religious experience and go "oh man, we are just some crazy moon religion!"

    ie, human religions are regionally distinct attempts to explain these feelings.

    The Cat on
    tmsig.jpg
  • We R DNAWe R DNA __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2007
    I remember reading about this work a long while back. Of course everyone responded with "but it's not the same".

    But more seriously, it's not really a "god spot". As people have pointed out, the common thing that happens in religion threads is people insisting they believe in god because they had a religious experience and that it "just hasn't happened for atheist folks", whereas the reality is probably more along the lines that you interpret the experience through whichever lens you put over it - rarely if ever does a person in an Islamic culture have a religious experience and go "oh man, we are just some crazy moon religion!"

    Neil Armstrong converted...

    We R DNA on
  • devoirdevoir Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    The Cat wrote: »
    I remember reading about this work a long while back. Of course everyone responded with "but it's not the same".

    But more seriously, it's not really a "god spot". As people have pointed out, the common thing that happens in religion threads is people insisting they believe in god because they had a religious experience and that it "just hasn't happened for atheist folks", whereas the reality is probably more along the lines that you interpret the experience through whichever lens you put over it - rarely if ever does a person in an Islamic culture have a religious experience and go "oh man, we are just some crazy moon religion!"

    ie, human religions are regionally distinct attempts to explain these feelings.

    In the same way that mankind has always tried to explain things like the sun rising, the weather, the rise and fall of the water level. Religion (in terms of how it relates to feelings of euphoria) is probably the last bastion of mankind's attempts to explain the world around him through story.

    devoir on
  • devoirdevoir Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    We R DNA wrote: »
    I remember reading about this work a long while back. Of course everyone responded with "but it's not the same".

    But more seriously, it's not really a "god spot". As people have pointed out, the common thing that happens in religion threads is people insisting they believe in god because they had a religious experience and that it "just hasn't happened for atheist folks", whereas the reality is probably more along the lines that you interpret the experience through whichever lens you put over it - rarely if ever does a person in an Islamic culture have a religious experience and go "oh man, we are just some crazy moon religion!"

    Neil Armstrong converted...

    A lot of people choose their religion based on the principles of the following. A lot of Christian people don't take the Bible literally, they choose to try and incorporate those values into their lives. Now, the reason behind trying to be a better person is up for debate, but trying to be a better person is generally a good thing.

    devoir on
  • edited October 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    devoir wrote: »
    The Cat wrote: »
    I remember reading about this work a long while back. Of course everyone responded with "but it's not the same".

    But more seriously, it's not really a "god spot". As people have pointed out, the common thing that happens in religion threads is people insisting they believe in god because they had a religious experience and that it "just hasn't happened for atheist folks", whereas the reality is probably more along the lines that you interpret the experience through whichever lens you put over it - rarely if ever does a person in an Islamic culture have a religious experience and go "oh man, we are just some crazy moon religion!"

    ie, human religions are regionally distinct attempts to explain these feelings.

    In the same way that mankind has always tried to explain things like the sun rising, the weather, the rise and fall of the water level. Religion (in terms of how it relates to feelings of euphoria) is probably the last bastion of mankind's attempts to explain the world around him through story.

    And probably just as difficult to make common knowledge as those were.

    I mean, consider the persecution of early scientists when they suggested the Earth orbited the sun, or that it was not flat.

    Now, you'd be laughed at if you suggested the sun orbited the Earth (the mother in the Grade A Idiocy thread notwithstanding). Its only a matter of time before religion's temporary nature is overturned. The old beliefs about various elements of our world were one way...then the truth was discovered, it took a period of time for the masses to come around and realise it, then it became common knowledge.

    How long do you think it will take for the same thing to happen with religion?

    Dhalphir on
  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Dhalphir wrote: »
    How long do you think it will take for the same thing to happen with religion?

    It's happened with religions before, but new religions cropped up to take their place.

    DarkPrimus on
  • We R DNAWe R DNA __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2007
    devoir wrote: »
    We R DNA wrote: »
    I remember reading about this work a long while back. Of course everyone responded with "but it's not the same".

    But more seriously, it's not really a "god spot". As people have pointed out, the common thing that happens in religion threads is people insisting they believe in god because they had a religious experience and that it "just hasn't happened for atheist folks", whereas the reality is probably more along the lines that you interpret the experience through whichever lens you put over it - rarely if ever does a person in an Islamic culture have a religious experience and go "oh man, we are just some crazy moon religion!"

    Neil Armstrong converted...

    A lot of people choose their religion based on the principles of the following. A lot of Christian people don't take the Bible literally, they choose to try and incorporate those values into their lives. Now, the reason behind trying to be a better person is up for debate, but trying to be a better person is generally a good thing.

    I should have completed that thought.

    "Neil Armstrong converted to Islam shortly after his trip to the Moon."

    However, further reading has turned up quite a few conflicting viewpoints. I guess it's not a popular time for an American Hero to be a Muslim.

    ELM -> Serious? I'd think walking on the Moon would probably be one of the most awe-inspiring experiences available to Mankind right now. (Barring a super doze of God-Therapy from the MRI helmet.)

    (Doubleedit: Nevermind. That has to be sarcarsm.)

    We R DNA on
  • Waka LakaWaka Laka Riding the stuffed Unicorn If ya know what I mean.Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    God Simulator aye?

    *Flashbacks of Black and White*

    "No! Bad Pet... no don't eat your doo doo... ... oh dear god why did you throw that man... throw the poo eat the ma... don't look at me like that!"

    Waka Laka on
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    We R DNA wrote: »
    I should have completed that thought.

    "Neil Armstrong converted to Islam shortly after his trip to the Moon."

    However, further reading has turned up quite a few conflicting viewpoints. I guess it's not a popular time for an American Hero to be a Muslim.

    Not if they wanted to die of natural causes, no.

    Incenjucar on
  • devoirdevoir Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    In regards to how long it will take for religion to leave us, I think it's unlikely to be swept away as (relatively) easily as the belief that the sun revolves around the Earth.

    Such a point (earth revolves around the sun) is a demonstrable fact, whereas religion has progressed from being an explanation for various phenomenon to being (for a lot of people) the center of their belief system. The 'stories' have evolved to the point that even using this scientific discovery in a debate could, would be rendered as some kind of support for their beliefs in that their beliefs (higher being, afterlife) cannot be disproven at this time and are very unlikely to be disproven unless technology alters our perception of the world far more drastically than science fiction is even suggesting.

    devoir on
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2007
    In before the inevitable "but God put that there so we could feel Him!" bullshit. This doesn't kill religion, it just makes it yet another chicken-egg thing.

    Wonder_Hippie on
  • devoirdevoir Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    In before the inevitable "but God put that there so we could feel Him!" bullshit. This doesn't kill religion, it just makes it yet another chicken-egg thing.

    Yep. This is a specific example of what I was referring to.

    devoir on
  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    "Person X converted to [religion]" is a text book example of the appeal to authority fallacy.

    Person X converting does not grant any sort of legitimacy to [religion].

    DarkPrimus on
  • Waka LakaWaka Laka Riding the stuffed Unicorn If ya know what I mean.Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Most people have been seeing God for Centuries there are 3 methods -

    1)Opium
    2)Pot
    3)Crack Cocaine

    I got a friend who says he hears god talk to him when he smokes pot. Seriously full blown conversations.

    Waka Laka on
  • We R DNAWe R DNA __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2007
    Well... this is out of left field, but what if we originally used that portion of our brains all the time?

    I don't mean walking around in a state of stupified awe all the time, but having a super heightened sense of awareness could be a good thing when you don't even know how to make spears or fire and you've got top billing on the menu.

    Is there a chance modern man has had an evolutionary downturn by filling our brains with mundane bullshit that, in the end, doesn't really benefit us at all?

    We R DNA on
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Geocentric beliefs aren't extinct yet.

    Religion as a whole?

    Not happening for, at the very very least, a thousand years, if ever.

    --

    Humans specialize to the extreme now, so they don't NEED to learn very much to survive.

    Your average hunter gatherer has huge amounts of data in them.

    Incenjucar on
  • HozHoz Cool Cat Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Can you imagine the ass kicking all those atheist cavemen got? Fucking wimps.

    Hoz on
  • LiveWireLiveWire Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    The Cat wrote: »
    I remember reading about this work a long while back. Of course everyone responded with "but it's not the same".

    But more seriously, it's not really a "god spot". As people have pointed out, the common thing that happens in religion threads is people insisting they believe in god because they had a religious experience and that it "just hasn't happened for atheist folks", whereas the reality is probably more along the lines that you interpret the experience through whichever lens you put over it - rarely if ever does a person in an Islamic culture have a religious experience and go "oh man, we are just some crazy moon religion!"

    ie, human religions are regionally distinct attempts to explain these feelings.

    I think more likely they just serve to reinforce religious belief rather than inducing it. There are more obvious inducers for the invention of religions (The questions "what is all this, how did I get here, what should I do?"). When the Enlightenment Button goes off I think people describe that experience within their existing schema, which is often religious.

    LiveWire on
  • Waka LakaWaka Laka Riding the stuffed Unicorn If ya know what I mean.Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Hoz wrote: »
    Can you imagine the ass kicking all those atheist cavemen got? Fucking wimps.

    HOW DARE YOU INSULT THE WORSHIP STONE!

    *Throws Stone at face*

    Waka Laka on
  • edited October 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • HozHoz Cool Cat Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Waka Laka wrote: »
    Hoz wrote: »
    Can you imagine the ass kicking all those atheist cavemen got? Fucking wimps.

    HOW DARE YOU INSULT THE WORSHIP STONE!

    *Throws Stone at face*

    More like:

    Caveman Jim: Hey guys, we're going to start doing human sacrifices for the sun god.

    Caveman Bob: That doesn't make any sense. Who is this guy and why should we be sacrificing ourselves for him?

    Caveman Jim: Thanks for volunteering, Caveman Bob.

    Hoz on
  • The CatThe Cat Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited October 2007
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Humans specialize to the extreme now, so they don't NEED to learn very much to survive.
    God, this is so apparent in some of my friends. Good at what they do, not stupid, and certainly knowledgeable about their hobbies, but they just don't know shit about so much other stuff. Most I can let go, but not knowing the history and politics of your own country is worrisome.

    The Cat on
    tmsig.jpg
  • edited October 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • Waka LakaWaka Laka Riding the stuffed Unicorn If ya know what I mean.Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Heh... yeah.

    Waka Laka on
  • We R DNAWe R DNA __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2007
    We R DNA wrote: »
    ELM -> Serious? I'd think walking on the Moon would probably be one of the most awe-inspiring experiences available to Mankind right now. (Barring a super doze of God-Therapy from the MRI helmet.)

    (Doubleedit: Nevermind. That has to be sarcarsm.)
    No I'm serious. Awe-inspiring, yes. But that was all it was. You have to come down from the moon, go back to a "normal" life, live day to day with hearing about the various fuck ups in the world (jesus, Vietnam was going on at that time).

    I can't remember if it was MadTV or SNL, but I saw a skit once that featured him. (Or it might have been Buzz Aldrin. Doesn't matter, similar experiences.)

    He basically wakes up in the morning, and his first thought is: "I was on the FREAKIN' MOON!"

    Then he goes about his daily business, having breakfast, brushing his teeth, feeding ducks in the park... all the while repeating the same thought.

    I imagine I'd feel similar.

    Anyone who thinks otherwise could probably use a few jolts of the God simulator. :p

    We R DNA on
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2007
    We R DNA wrote: »
    ELM -> Serious? I'd think walking on the Moon would probably be one of the most awe-inspiring experiences available to Mankind right now. (Barring a super doze of God-Therapy from the MRI helmet.)

    (Doubleedit: Nevermind. That has to be sarcarsm.)
    No I'm serious. Awe-inspiring, yes. But that was all it was. You have to come down from the moon, go back to a "normal" life, live day to day with hearing about the various fuck ups in the world (jesus, Vietnam was going on at that time).

    I could easily see that turning somebody into Comedian from Watchmen.

    Wonder_Hippie on
  • DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    The Cat wrote: »
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Humans specialize to the extreme now, so they don't NEED to learn very much to survive.
    God, this is so apparent in some of my friends. Good at what they do, not stupid, and certainly knowledgeable about their hobbies, but they just don't know shit about so much other stuff. Most I can let go, but not knowing the history and politics of your own country is worrisome.

    Australian history consists of "we came, we killed some aborigines, hey look it's today!"

    Honestly who gives a fuck? You've heard one European colonization story you've heard them all.


    ^^ This.

    I have always been of the opinion that exact dates are irrelevant when it comes to history.

    It is of no demonstrable value for me to be able to say that the Australian Commonwealth was formed on Jan 1st, 1901 (which it was :)). However, it IS of value for me to know that it was formed as partially a move for increased defence capabilities, or for me to know that initially, Western Australia was reluctant to join the Commonwealth, because we were much richer than the other colonies and were wary of being ripped off by them.

    I don't need to know exactly WHEN these things happened. Just knowing that they happened, knowing why they were important, and a ROUGH idea of what order they happened in.

    Dhalphir on
  • HozHoz Cool Cat Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Are you guys going for some Least Interesting Thread Derailment award?

    Hoz on
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2007
    You need to know that shit for trivia and quiz bowl, I don't know what you're talking about.

    Wonder_Hippie on
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    The Cat wrote: »
    God, this is so apparent in some of my friends. Good at what they do, not stupid, and certainly knowledgeable about their hobbies, but they just don't know shit about so much other stuff. Most I can let go, but not knowing the history and politics of your own country is worrisome.

    Not to mention what happens to most people if you drop them in the wilderness, or just dealing with their bodies or other creatures (it always hurts my head how helpless some people are around agitated animals).

    If it wasn't part of their job training and reinforced, they never learned it or forgot it right after the test they learned it for.

    Incenjucar on
  • devoirdevoir Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Aussies.

    We'll kill you with apathy.

    devoir on
  • DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    devoir wrote: »
    Aussies.

    We'll kill you with apathy.

    That statement is made of Win and Truth.

    Dhalphir on
  • Apothe0sisApothe0sis Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality? Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Any pro-religion argument from this is going to be fantastic.

    Religion is a temporal lobe seizure, way to aim high guys.

    Apothe0sis on
  • We R DNAWe R DNA __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2007
    devoir wrote: »
    Aussies.

    We'll kill you with apathy.

    And Crocodile Dundee.

    We R DNA on
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    The job of a scientists is to try to find answers to questions that people can't answer. Weather it be medical, religious, or whatever. While this is incredibly interesting, I don't think it's some giant leap in human evolution, or de-evolution for that matter. I think it's just another way for people to get high, triggering parts of their brain that are normally dormant.

    In the last few weeks I've seen stories of breakthroughs on brain wave patterns that can let users talk to god, control electronic devices (there's a, god, I don't want to say it...but there's a video game controller about to launch that picks up on alpha, beta, and theta brain waves to control a video game), and do pretty much whatever else we can imagine. I think basically someone has started the next step into truly unlocking the potential of the human mind, but I wouldn't worry that it's going to ever take away religion. I'm absolutely amazed at what we're going to be able to do by the time I'm 50, but I'm still going to look up at the stars at night and wonder what put them there. There's just too many questions for me not to have some kind of faith in a higher power.

    To answer the OP questions:
    1) I don't think religiously that it will be some huge evolutionary leap.
    2) I think that it could be the first step into finding out just what exactly we are capable of when we're using more of our mind than we're used to.

    To post my own question:
    What's the fear effect going to be? I've heard of studies in the past where subjects were placed in sensory experiments to trigger advanced brain funtion, put in rooms completely mirrored in such a way that basically the human eye could see in all directions, and some were driven nearly insane by the overload. (I'm sorry I don't have a link, I did look, but I couldn't find it) What will the reprocussion(s) be when some guy is standing in a back alley offering the chance to "meet god", or when human potential is increased, but only to the rich and powerful. How will the rest of the world react?

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
Sign In or Register to comment.