As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
We're funding a new Acquisitions Incorporated series on Kickstarter right now! Check it out at https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pennyarcade/acquisitions-incorporated-the-series-2

Orange Box: 360 or PC version?

RWangsRWangs Registered User regular
edited October 2007 in Games and Technology
The question is simple, the answer, to me, is not :lol: I am uncertain on which version I would prefer and I need your help on deciding!

So here are a few details:

- I have the latest Macbook Pro with 2 gigs of Ram running Vista under Boot Camp and
- a 360 running on a Standard Def television.

So far, the PC version looks like a better buy for me since it's $10 cheaper and I don't have to pay for Live to keep playing it online.

How well can I expect it to run on my Mac anyway? My friend was able to play the original Half-Life 2 on his 1st-Gen Dual Core iMac with most settings at their maximum. Can I only expect performance to go up from there?

Any and all suggestions would help.

PS3 tag/ MGO ID : Terasozin
41.png
RWangs on
«13

Posts

  • WordsworthWordsworth Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Get it on PC if you don't care about gamerpoints. The improved control scheme alone is worth it. Some puzzles from Portal will make your head spin on the 360.

    Wordsworth on
    Xbox LIVE: Wordsworth IV
  • XaevXaev Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Go with PC if you can; as mentioned, KBAM is much better than a controller for shooters.

    However, in my situation most of my friends do not have computers capable of running it (or are not inclined to PC gaming) so I went with the Xbox version simply so we could play TF2 together.

    Xaev on
    Steam - Lysus || XBL - Veax || PSN - Lysus || WoW - Lysus (Korgath - US) || Guild Wars - Lysus Yjirkar || Starcraft II - Lysus.781 || League of Legends - Lysus
    Feel free to add me on whatever network, it's always more fun to play with people than alone
  • TyrantCowTyrantCow Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    If TF2 is a big draw... the above eludes to... Go with the one you will have more people to play with.
    If you got a bunch of people on Xbox Live/Steam, go with that. Team based game, it's a lot more fun if you have people to play with. The PA servers on PC are always a good time; but, I couldn't blame you if you had 20 buddies on Live.

    TyrantCow on
  • bruinbruin Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Wordsworth wrote: »
    Get it on PC if you don't care about gamerpoints. The improved control scheme alone is worth it. Some puzzles from Portal will make your head spin on the 360.

    Aiming will be better on PC, but playing Portal on 360 is completely fine and good

    bruin on
  • RWangsRWangs Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I don't really know anyone on Live who plays TF2... just Halo, so that's not a problem. I'd love to join the PA Steam servers if anyone could tell me how I would go about joining.

    Did anyone try playing the Orange Box with a Macbook Pro? What kind of performance can I experience? S.T.A.L.K.E.R. had terrible frame-rate on it no matter what my settings were, so that scared me off of PC gaming on my laptop a little.

    Will I be consumed by TF2 if I start playing? I have a GPA to maintain :P

    RWangs on
    PS3 tag/ MGO ID : Terasozin
    41.png
  • NocrenNocren Lt Futz, Back in Action North CarolinaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I'll be honest, I got it on 360 mainly because my system was groaning on Eps 1 so I really didn't want to push it with Eps 2 and Portal. After my upgrade though I might see if TF2 is available solo so I can play on PC. (I really don't like to purchase things twice, but games like TF2, hell MP FPS in general, have a longer lifespan on the PC).

    I did notice that overall the main game (HL2) ran well, a few little details here and there were left out (Kliener blow dust off the clip board, but there was no dust, and the Vort on the Railroad didn't do a steady charge, just a quick 15 power jolt.)

    Nocren on
    newSig.jpg
  • FibretipFibretip Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    don't take stalker as a benchmark of your performance. S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is one of the most horribly optimised games ever released, my pc eats bioshock, oblivion, fear etc alive, but if i try to push stalker to anything other than directx8 it stutters to it's knees. It's obviously very fussy about your hardware combinations or something.

    Ep1 for me did make my pc work a lot harder than hl2 itself, but I imagine you'd be fine... espeically if you're not too fussed about the biggies like HDR etc.

    Fibretip on
    I believe in angels, not the kind with wings, no...not the kind with halos, the kind who bring you home
  • Recoil42Recoil42 Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Xaev wrote: »
    KBAM is much better than a controller for shooters.

    I hate to turn this into one of those threads, but no. Make the damn distinction, ok?

    KBAM is much better than a Controller for a PC shooter.

    It is NOT a universal fact for ANY shooter. It all depends on what system the game was originally designed for.

    In this case, (or f.ex UT2kX) yes, the PC is absolutely the system to choose. But throw me Gears, Crackdown, or Halo, and I'll choose the 360, any time. There's a damn variable here, don't choose to ignore it. Get it right, make the distinction.

    Recoil42 on
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Recoil42 wrote: »
    Xaev wrote: »
    KBAM is much better than a controller for shooters.

    I hate to turn this into one of those threads, but no. Make the damn distinction, ok?

    KBAM is much better than a Controller for a PC shooter.

    It is NOT a universal fact for ANY shooter. It all depends on what system the game was originally designed for.

    In this case, or UT2kX yes, the PC is the system to choose. But throw me Gears, Crackdown, or Halo, and I'll choose the 360, any time. There's a damn variable here, don't choose to ignore it. Get it right.

    Except, we're talking about a PC shooter here. You can't deny that valve is primarily a PC developer.

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • Recoil42Recoil42 Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Spoit wrote: »
    Recoil42 wrote: »
    Xaev wrote: »
    KBAM is much better than a controller for shooters.

    I hate to turn this into one of those threads, but no. Make the damn distinction, ok?

    KBAM is much better than a Controller for a PC shooter.

    It is NOT a universal fact for ANY shooter. It all depends on what system the game was originally designed for.

    In this case, or UT2kX yes, the PC is the system to choose. But throw me Gears, Crackdown, or Halo, and I'll choose the 360, any time. There's a damn variable here, don't choose to ignore it. Get it right.

    Except, we're talking about a PC shooter here. You can't deny that valve is primarily a PC developer.

    Uh, that's exactly my point, my problem is that he made a universal statement, and referred to shooters in general as ALWAYS better on KBaM, implying that it was regardless of what system the game was designed for, rather than making the distinction for PC shooters.

    I'm agreeing with you, dude. Read what I wrote.
    In this case, (or f.ex UT2kX) yes, the PC is absolutely the system to choose.

    Recoil42 on
  • FyreWulffFyreWulff YouRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited October 2007
    I had no problem with HL2 on OXbox... except for the fact that there was no Legacy control scheme.

    Just get the one you really want, as long as you can run it.

    FyreWulff on
  • eelektrikeelektrik Southern CaliforniaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Recoil42 wrote: »
    Xaev wrote: »
    KBAM is much better than a controller for shooters.

    I hate to turn this into one of those threads, but no. Make the damn distinction, ok?

    KBAM is much better than a Controller for a PC shooter.

    It is NOT a universal fact for ANY shooter. It all depends on what system the game was originally designed for.

    In this case, or UT2kX yes, the PC is the system to choose. But throw me Gears, Crackdown, or Halo, and I'll choose the 360, any time. There's a damn variable here, don't choose to ignore it. Get it right.

    Unless its a really shoddy port, you just aren't going to get the same speed and accuracy out of a thumbstick as you will with a mouse.

    eelektrik on
    (She/Her)
  • durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I'd get it on PC.

    Of course, I'd also have preordered it so it was even more of an awesome deal.

    But, yeah. It's $10 cheaper, and it's the same stuff. Plus, TF2 will probably last longer on the PC in terms of community. I kind of want it on the 360 too, just because it's the best deal I've ever gotten.

    Oh! And buying it on Steam is cash directly to Valve, so that's nice.

    durandal4532 on
    Take a moment to donate what you can to Critical Resistance and Black Lives Matter.
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Oh, sorry recoll, I misread your post. Anyway, there are also already custom maps out there for TF2 and portal on the PC. Which is good too.

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • FatsFats Corvallis, ORRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Recoil42 wrote: »
    Xaev wrote: »
    KBAM is much better than a controller for shooters.

    I hate to turn this into one of those threads, but no. Make the damn distinction, ok?

    KBAM is much better than a Controller for a PC shooter.

    It is NOT a universal fact for ANY shooter. It all depends on what system the game was originally designed for.

    In this case, (or f.ex UT2kX) yes, the PC is absolutely the system to choose. But throw me Gears, Crackdown, or Halo, and I'll choose the 360, any time. There's a damn variable here, don't choose to ignore it. Get it right, make the distinction.

    I dunno, playing Gears lately left me wanting for a mouse in the worst way. I'm not good with a controller, though.

    I say get the PC version, as far as I know the Macbook Pro should run it fine.

    Fats on
  • ZombiemamboZombiemambo Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I don't think this box can run anything besides HL2, so I nabbed it for the 360. If my machine was better I wouldn't hesitate to get it for the PC, though. TF2 isn't much fun on the console, at least in my experience. Bad lag, terrible teammates and the controls don't feel very tight. Portal feels good and I didn't feel any sort of disadvantage from using a controller.

    In the end, I'd say go for PC. Better controls, as well as mods and a lower price.

    Zombiemambo on
    JKKaAGp.png
  • MidshipmanMidshipman Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    RWangs wrote: »
    Standard Def television.

    Unless you plan on upgrading your television in the near future, this seems like it should take the 360 version out of the running.

    Midshipman on
    midshipman.jpg
  • ZombiemamboZombiemambo Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Midshipman wrote: »
    RWangs wrote: »
    Standard Def television.

    Unless you plan on upgrading your television in the near future, this seems like it should take the 360 version out of the running.

    No way. I'm using an old 32" television and it still looks very nice.

    Zombiemambo on
    JKKaAGp.png
  • noobertnoobert Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    If TF2 is the main reason behind you getting the orange box, then get it in the same format as your friends have.

    But yeah, personally i'd go with the PC version due to the control style. But if you are getting it mainly for HL and portal, go with whatever control style you prefer.

    noobert on
  • RoshinRoshin My backlog can be seen from space SwedenRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    TBH, I got it for both the PC and the 360, because I couldn't make up my mind. That and I'm big fat Valve whore.

    Roshin on
    steam_sig.png
  • GdiguyGdiguy San Diego, CARegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Nocren wrote: »
    I'll be honest, I got it on 360 mainly because my system was groaning on Eps 1 so I really didn't want to push it with Eps 2 and Portal. After my upgrade though I might see if TF2 is available solo so I can play on PC. (I really don't like to purchase things twice, but games like TF2, hell MP FPS in general, have a longer lifespan on the PC).

    I did notice that overall the main game (HL2) ran well, a few little details here and there were left out (Kliener blow dust off the clip board, but there was no dust, and the Vort on the Railroad didn't do a steady charge, just a quick 15 power jolt.)

    To tack on a question to this - are Ep 1/2/Portal more pc taxing than HL2? My comp can run HL2 fine (my hl2 actually came with the radeon back when they had that promotion going, hehe), but I wasn't sure if they've updated the engine for the new episodes

    Gdiguy on
  • LaCabraLaCabra MelbourneRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Yes, Episode 1/2/Portal/TF2 are all far, far more taxing than HL2.

    What's the video card in the macbook pro? Radeon Xsomethingsomething? You'll be fine as long as you aren't using the intel integrated graphics that were on the last mac I used. You should be able to turn the graphics up pretty far, and those things support a decent resolution, too. You'll need to right-click, though, so don't forget to plug in a mouse.

    LaCabra on
  • noobertnoobert Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    LaCabra wrote: »
    Yes, Episode 1/2/Portal/TF2 are all far, far more taxing than HL2.

    What's the video card in the macbook pro? Radeon Xsomethingsomething? You'll be fine as long as you aren't using the intel integrated graphics that were on the last mac I used. You should be able to turn the graphics up pretty far, and those things support a decent resolution, too. You'll need to right-click, though, so don't forget to plug in a mouse.

    8600m.... So it's no pushover.

    noobert on
  • 1600Points1600Points Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    PC version if you're pc can handle it.

    With such a strong community presence with steam you'll get a lot more player generated content vs the every so often content updates on XBL.

    1600Points on
    Steam ID - 1600Points
    Xbox Live - Doctor Xedd
    Gametap - RIbar77
  • LaCabraLaCabra MelbourneRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Definitely PC then.

    LaCabra on
  • TavTav Irish Minister for DefenceRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Don't forget that the PC version will have all the mods, map packs and all the other things that the HL2 community has been working on the the last 4 years. I mean, the amount of stuff out there by them is unreal. This is just a small amount of them.

    Tav on
  • ZombiemamboZombiemambo Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I'm almost tempted to purchase HL2 for the PC just for all of the awesome mods that have come out for it.

    Zombiemambo on
    JKKaAGp.png
  • subediisubedii Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    LaCabra wrote: »
    Yes, Episode 1/2/Portal/TF2 are all far, far more taxing than HL2.

    They're not THAT much more taxing. To a large extent you can turn the graphics down to about HL2 equivalent and still get a decent framerate (this of course varies depending on what your HL2 experience was originally and what sort of hardware you've got). The Source engine has always been incredibly scalable (It was originally designed for DX7 cards after all).

    Really, I doubt the Macbook is going to have any real problem with it. Might have to turn down newer features like the highest res textures and the turn down the bloom settings, but if it ends up looking largely like HL2 I suspect it won't run much slower than HL2 did.

    Also: http://www.hl2mods.co.uk/ . Not exhaustive, but a pretty good listing. Plus Steam has it's own native listing of mods for HL2 as well, which you jst download straight off Steam and play.

    Actually, if you're any sort of PC (or in this case, Mac) gamer, I'd say the Steam store and community features are a pretty huge plus. You can find a lot of really classic games (nw and old) for some quite good prices. Community aspect isn't necessarily as good as XBL though since it's not universal throughout all games (some games have compatibility issues with the Steam community features), but it's a recent feature and they're constantly improving it.

    TF2 will probably get a better and longer play time on PC. Honestly, I only originally bought the Orange Box for Episode 2 and Portal, and I hardly ever gamed online anymore. Once I tried TF2 though, I was instantly hooked with how easy it was to get into, how brillinatly the gameplay works, and how the game is built around teamwork to the extent that it's intuitive to how you play your class. Easily a brilliant game.

    So yeah, I'd say PC.

    subedii on
  • LaCabraLaCabra MelbourneRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    subedii wrote: »
    LaCabra wrote: »
    Yes, Episode 1/2/Portal/TF2 are all far, far more taxing than HL2.

    They're not THAT much more taxing. To a large extent you can turn the graphics down to about HL2 equivalent and still get a decent framerate (this of course varies depending on what your HL2 experience was originally and what sort of hardware you've got). The Source engine has always been incredibly scalable (It was originally designed for DX7 cards after all).

    Well yeah, I'm assuming he doesn't want it to look like complete arse. Even on medium settings, yes, the episodes are that much more taxing than vanilla, non-HDR HL2.

    Neither here nor there though, as the macbook will run both fine.

    LaCabra on
  • expendableexpendable Silly Goose Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    LaCabra wrote: »
    subedii wrote: »
    LaCabra wrote: »
    Yes, Episode 1/2/Portal/TF2 are all far, far more taxing than HL2.

    They're not THAT much more taxing. To a large extent you can turn the graphics down to about HL2 equivalent and still get a decent framerate (this of course varies depending on what your HL2 experience was originally and what sort of hardware you've got). The Source engine has always been incredibly scalable (It was originally designed for DX7 cards after all).

    Well yeah, I'm assuming he doesn't want it to look like complete arse. Even on medium settings, yes, the episodes are that much more taxing than vanilla, non-HDR HL2.

    Neither here nor there though, as the macbook will run both fine.

    I can almost guarantee I have an crappier system than most of you. My PC has a 2 gig Pentium, 768 MB of RAM, and an nVidia GeForce FX 5200 video card.

    Sure, DirectX 10 is out of the question (so long, HDR!) but I can run medium video settings without any problems, and it still looks pretty good.

    expendable on
    Djiem wrote: »
    Lokiamis wrote: »
    So the servers suddenly decide to cramp up during the last six percent.
    Man, the Director will really go out of his way to be a dick to L4D players.
    Steam
  • TetraNitroCubaneTetraNitroCubane The Djinnerator At the bottom of a bottleRegistered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Do you want to use the Aperture Science Handheld Portal Device in Half Life 2?

    If the answer is yes, I recommend the PC version.

    (Note that this is still a bit buggy, from what I've seen, but still looking promising for future mods)

    TetraNitroCubane on
    VuIBhrs.png
  • Inglorious CoyoteInglorious Coyote Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    or what nit's worth, I know a guy playing Orange Box on his MacBook Pro, and according to him it runs just fine.

    So in that case, I'd go for the PC version. I have the 360 version, and it's good, but the games where really designed for the PC.

    Inglorious Coyote on
  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Minerva: Metastasis alone is enough incentive to get it for the PC.

    DarkPrimus on
    usnTyq4.jpg
    Gamertag: PrimusD | Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
  • Smug DucklingSmug Duckling Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I have the 360 version, and the controls are just as good as Halo (not quite up to PC standards), so they're good enough for me.

    Smug Duckling on
    smugduckling,pc,days.png
  • WienkeWienke Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    Do you like a couch or a computer chair better?

    That said I'm really enjoying Orange Box on 360 since my PC is like 4 years old. I have had problems with just TF2 (none of the rest of the box) locking up when its searching for games, usually when I back out and attempt to search again too quickly.

    Lock ups are annoying but sometimes unavoidable on a PC. For a console, it feels unacceptable.

    Wienke on
    PSN: TheWienke
  • liquidloganliquidlogan Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I play my 360 on my PC monitor :P

    At any rate, I think PC would be the way to go on this for the mods alone.

    liquidlogan on
  • DehumanizedDehumanized Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I'd strongly recommend the PC version, for the main feature of having TF2 dedicated servers.

    Dehumanized on
  • LingxorLingxor Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    p2p hosting sucks.

    Get the PC version.

    Lingxor on
  • AzioAzio Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I have the same laptop as you and Source games run beautifully. The PC version is cheaper and better than the 360 version so the answer should be clear.

    Azio on
  • StigmaStigma Registered User regular
    edited October 2007
    I'll just say that I am enjoying my 360 version.
    It probably doesn't compare to the PC version but hey, it works.

    Stigma on
    YHWHYinYangblueblackblueborder.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.