You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
Hmmm... the dashing-through-the-snow puppy might be on to something.
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
Hmmm... the dashing-through-the-snow puppy might be on to something.
Last time I checked, puppies couldn't talk.
Nono, he's literally on something... I think I see an arm reaching out of the snowbank there. Someone help the boy!
LaOs on
0
Options
cj iwakuraThe Rhythm RegentBears The Name FreedomRegistered Userregular
edited November 2007
This is going to sound beyond stupid, but how does real-life Mafia work?
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
Only a Protestant would be so foolish.
Huh?
I thought New England was protestant, IE puritan, and hated the pope.
You're therefore saying that you're not protestant, IE not in the majority, IE a cultist.
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
I've predicted people this early in a day before
I believe he may be on to something.
hmmm !Vote Zot
I'm not so keen on the voting for yourself trick. What is going on there, hmm??
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
I've predicted people this early in a day before
I believe he may be on to something.
hmmm !Vote Zot
I'm not so keen on the voting for yourself trick. What is going on there, hmm??
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
I've predicted people this early in a day before
I believe he may be on to something.
hmmm !Vote Zot
I'm not so keen on the voting for yourself trick. What is going on there, hmm??
If James did turn out to be evil then KrunkMcGrunk and LaOs could both reasonably be trusted as good. Unfortunately thats as far as the incrimination/vindication train goes this early in the game. Right now, the most information would be gleaned by executing Pretentious. If he is a bad guy, the KrunkMcGrunk probably is as well. If not, then we should execute Rakaam next. If they both turn out to be innocent, then Quid and Chamberlain are almost certainly bad guys.
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
Only a Protestant would be so foolish.
Huh?
I thought New England was protestant, IE puritan, and hated the pope.
You're therefore saying that you're not protestant, IE not in the majority, IE a cultist.
If James did turn out to be evil then KrunkMcGrunk and LaOs could both reasonably be trusted as good. Unfortunately thats as far as the incrimination/vindication train goes this early in the game. Right now, the most information would be gleaned by executing Pretentious. If he is a bad guy, the KrunkMcGrunk probably is as well. If not, then we should execute Rakaam next. If they both turn out to be innocent, then Quid and Chamberlain are almost certainly bad guys.
I !vote for Pretentious.
There are a lot of words there... what have you based all this on?
(I like my Phalla theories distilled and ready-made for consumption.)
Wait, if I'm evil then why is KrunkMcGrunk evil? I mean, he voted for me Night 1 (which is used as a tactic to distance themselves from their fellow evils) but that's hardly proof. Especially seeing as it's not like my bandwagon is set in stone, so him voting for me just makes it more likely that others will vote for me (based on typical villager logic, which is that if enough other people are willing to vote for X, there must be some good reason why). It's not like it's a late "oh he's going to die might as well distance myself" vote.
Unless of course he thought someone would think this....
Honestly, I'm not talking too much because there is little to say.
I'm browsing through peoples messages, looking for anything that sticks out. Honestly, I understand why yall wanna wagon me, and if you think its for the good of the village, go ahead.
Even though I already did a reveal
Also, I spent the first four and a half pages making my low quality sig.
I've always been under the impression that activity in of itself indicated that you are good, as most evils will want to stay out of the witch hunting and bandwagoning that occurs in most phallas. Then again we can't figure out the truly suspicious people without a few days of villagers going around and killing eachother. Hopefully by the time we figure all of this out the cultists wont have inevitability, as 2 deaths per turn by itself seems pretty harsh before you count in the possibility of the village/the arsonists completely misfiring for three days straight.
Then again, I might be overthinking this entirely.
Anyhoo, there really isnt very many people here that are being suspicious other than me. Because of that, my vote stays on Raakam simply for the sake of self preservation.
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
Only a Protestant would be so foolish.
Huh?
I thought New England was protestant, IE puritan, and hated the pope.
You're therefore saying that you're not protestant, IE not in the majority, IE a cultist.
Adorable puppy>>>some dude smoking something.
Ruff ruff! Good doggie.
You know, there seem to be a great many people not taking the situation in our village seriously. Why? Because they are trying to kill us via disease and/or poison! After we take down Aldo, I suggest we vote for Zot and zanmatto. Your lives depend on this!
It would be extraordinary work if you have managed to find out that both Zot and Zanmatto are both evil so early on.
Thus, I think that you are evil, because if you are you would know that these guys are perfectly innocent.
Only a Protestant would be so foolish.
Huh?
I thought New England was protestant, IE puritan, and hated the pope.
You're therefore saying that you're not protestant, IE not in the majority, IE a cultist.
If James did turn out to be evil then KrunkMcGrunk and LaOs could both reasonably be trusted as good. Unfortunately thats as far as the incrimination/vindication train goes this early in the game. Right now, the most information would be gleaned by executing Pretentious. If he is a bad guy, the KrunkMcGrunk probably is as well. If not, then we should execute Rakaam next. If they both turn out to be innocent, then Quid and Chamberlain are almost certainly bad guys.
I !vote for Pretentious.
There are a lot of words there... what have you based all this on?
(I like my Phalla theories distilled and ready-made for consumption.)
Let me flip through my observations notebook. Ah yes, these are the "distilled" passages:
LaOs is DEFINITELY NOT in league with James
KrunkMcGrunk is PROBABLY a bad guy if Pretentious is bad
Irenedadler is DEFINTELY NOT in league with Pretentious
IF both Pretentious and Rakaam are INNOCENT then Quid COULD BE a bad guy with Chamberlain
KrunkMcGrunk is DEFINETELY NOT in league with James
I have got two in half pages of this stuff and the material citing it, but I would rather not reveal my qualifications for certain judgements for obvious reasons, but each one is researched with a method.
I've always been under the impression that activity in of itself indicated that you are good, as most evils will want to stay out of the witch hunting and bandwagoning that occurs in most phallas. Then again we can't figure out the truly suspicious people without a few days of villagers going around and killing eachother. Hopefully by the time we figure all of this out the cultists wont have inevitability, as 2 deaths per turn by itself seems pretty harsh before you count in the possibility of the village/the arsonists completely misfiring for three days straight.
Then again, I might be overthinking this entirely.
I don't know if you're overthinking, but generally I find activity with respect to consistency over the history of Phalla participation to be much more important than activity on its own.
If Zot is always a posty bitch, him being a posty bitch this time around doesn't really prove anything. This is even more true if he's been a posty bitch whether a goodie, baddie, neutral or dead (ha!). I think looking to the people who are not acting as they normally do as suspicious (however, I temper this with the warning that today was a half-day start added to the front of the real Day 1, so some people need time to realise the game is going and to get their gears going).
Must... Catch up in posts... even if it means not doing my homework until laterrrrr!!!!!!!
Lady Eri is acting suspicious
Now, I may not know anything about her/him/it
But I do know this:
Why would a Wookie, an 8 foot tall Wookie, be living on Endor with a bunch of 2 foot tall Ewoks? This does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, then Lady Eri must be evil! The defense rests.
If James did turn out to be evil then KrunkMcGrunk and LaOs could both reasonably be trusted as good. Unfortunately thats as far as the incrimination/vindication train goes this early in the game. Right now, the most information would be gleaned by executing Pretentious. If he is a bad guy, the KrunkMcGrunk probably is as well. If not, then we should execute Rakaam next. If they both turn out to be innocent, then Quid and Chamberlain are almost certainly bad guys.
I !vote for Pretentious.
There are a lot of words there... what have you based all this on?
(I like my Phalla theories distilled and ready-made for consumption.)
Let me flip through my observations notebook. Ah yes, these are the "distilled" passages:
LaOs is DEFINITELY NOT in league with James
KrunkMcGrunk is PROBABLY a bad guy if Pretentious is bad
Irenedadler is DEFINTELY NOT in league with Pretentious
IF both Pretentious and Rakaam are INNOCENT then Quid COULD BE a bad guy with Chamberlain
KrunkMcGrunk is DEFINETELY NOT in league with James
I have got two in half pages of this stuff and the material citing it, but I would rather not reveal my qualifications for certain judgements for obvious reasons, but each one is researched with a method.
Clever...
although not completely answering what I was asking.
I got that you think some people are tied to other people, but I was wondering at the how you came to those conclusions. I've got a wide-open PM box if you don't want to be too public with your methods. Takes some trust on your part, so I would understand if you don't go for it.
Posts
Last time I checked, puppies couldn't talk.
I've predicted people this early in a day before
I believe he may be on to something.
hmmm !Vote Zot
Something about his name seems... diabolical.
What time is it in EST right now... 10:33pm?
Edit: Yep Laos that's right.
Nono, he's literally on something... I think I see an arm reaching out of the snowbank there. Someone help the boy!
Huh?
I thought New England was protestant, IE puritan, and hated the pope.
You're therefore saying that you're not protestant, IE not in the majority, IE a cultist.
I'm not so keen on the voting for yourself trick. What is going on there, hmm??
Notice who he just strangely disappeared?
Also he was a lot less active when he was good in the only phalla he's been in so far
strange
Thank you very much.
And yeah, tomorrow will be a good day to think on who to vote for.
No trick
I think I'm acting pretty suspicious as well
But I take this very seriously
Phalla is serious business
Hmm... now what to make of that?
I think you're evil
Anyone able to post more than I must be evil
Always.
Always.
I !vote for Pretentious.
Ruff ruff! Good doggie.
You've clearly not been paying attention to my posting history.
I died on day two (or three, I think) in the Oregon Phalla and still had the most posts in the thread by the last day. It just happens.
Please, someone tell me they got that.
I'M ON TO ALL OF YOU
There are a lot of words there... what have you based all this on?
(I like my Phalla theories distilled and ready-made for consumption.)
This is not a lie
I do think that Zanmatto is acting suspicious based off of the one phalla he's played
Do you like it on top?
Now, the question is, would the Poisoners or the Infectors prefer the dominant position?
Unless of course he thought someone would think this....
I'm browsing through peoples messages, looking for anything that sticks out. Honestly, I understand why yall wanna wagon me, and if you think its for the good of the village, go ahead.
Even though I already did a reveal
Also, I spent the first four and a half pages making my low quality sig.
Maybe he went to bed?
I'm thinking of doing that.
(Yes, I know it's only quarter to ten, Zot. I am sleepy... and want to re-read more ASoIaF.)
Then again, I might be overthinking this entirely.
3DS: 2852-6809-9411
Adorable Puppy>>>Some guy smoking something.
Let me flip through my observations notebook. Ah yes, these are the "distilled" passages:
LaOs is DEFINITELY NOT in league with James
KrunkMcGrunk is PROBABLY a bad guy if Pretentious is bad
Irenedadler is DEFINTELY NOT in league with Pretentious
IF both Pretentious and Rakaam are INNOCENT then Quid COULD BE a bad guy with Chamberlain
KrunkMcGrunk is DEFINETELY NOT in league with James
I have got two in half pages of this stuff and the material citing it, but I would rather not reveal my qualifications for certain judgements for obvious reasons, but each one is researched with a method.
I don't know if you're overthinking, but generally I find activity with respect to consistency over the history of Phalla participation to be much more important than activity on its own.
If Zot is always a posty bitch, him being a posty bitch this time around doesn't really prove anything. This is even more true if he's been a posty bitch whether a goodie, baddie, neutral or dead (ha!). I think looking to the people who are not acting as they normally do as suspicious (however, I temper this with the warning that today was a half-day start added to the front of the real Day 1, so some people need time to realise the game is going and to get their gears going).
perhaps i am the doctor that became infected when he visited!
Lady Eri is acting suspicious
Now, I may not know anything about her/him/it
But I do know this:
Why would a Wookie, an 8 foot tall Wookie, be living on Endor with a bunch of 2 foot tall Ewoks? This does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, then Lady Eri must be evil! The defense rests.
although not completely answering what I was asking.
I got that you think some people are tied to other people, but I was wondering at the how you came to those conclusions. I've got a wide-open PM box if you don't want to be too public with your methods. Takes some trust on your part, so I would understand if you don't go for it.
3DS: 2852-6809-9411