The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Some of you fuckers

RuckusRuckus Registered User regular
edited November 2007 in Social Entropy++
need to clean out your photobuckets.

Internet nearing capacity, U.S. study says
CBC wrote:
Increasing internet access and new capacity-intensive uses like streaming, interactive videos and shared music files are pushing the system toward gridlock, a U.S. study warns.

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2007/11/21/internet-gridlock.html

Now help me compile a list of websites that should be deleted to save bandwidth. So far I've got:

1)Myspace
2)Any site dedicated to skinning Myspace or anyother social networking site
3)Anything registered to or under the control of Tim Buckley

Ruckus on
«13456

Posts

  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited November 2007
    Don't forget 4chan

    Druhim on
    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • SeriouslySeriously Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    You know, I just did that last week.

    Seriously on
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited November 2007
    SE++.

    Just sayin'. :)

    Squashua on
  • msuitepyonmsuitepyon Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Ruckus wrote: »
    1)Myspace
    2)Any site dedicated to skinning Myspace or anyother social networking site
    3)Anything registered to or under the control of Tim Buckley

    This is fine.

    msuitepyon on
  • RuckusRuckus Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Druhim wrote: »
    Don't forget 4chan

    But where will people store their retarded gifs and shock images?

    Ruckus on
  • KnobKnob TURN THE BEAT BACK InternetModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited November 2007
    Uh

    You can't fill up the

    you know what, nevermind

    Knob on
  • SeriouslySeriously Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    But the box where the internet is!

    The one stamped INTERNET


    I heard they put it in the ocean.

    Seriously on
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Yeah uh this doesn't really seem like an issue.

    Defender on
  • IskanderIskander Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Google is hogging all the megabitz

    Iskander on
  • BedlamBedlam Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Somebody call pantsmonkey.

    We need to know where the internets are so we can clean out the tubes.

    Also to wash the truck.

    And defrag the blagoblog.

    Bedlam on
  • KnobKnob TURN THE BEAT BACK InternetModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited November 2007
    now for the next week i have to hear from ignorant shits about how there's too much stuff on the internet and i need to stop putting stuff on it or it'll break

    Knob on
  • KnobKnob TURN THE BEAT BACK InternetModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited November 2007
    HAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA TUBES AND TRUCKS!

    HAHAHAHA LIKE WHAT THAT GUY SAID THAT ONE TIME!

    HAHAHAH LOOK OUT OSCAR WILDE!

    Knob on
  • RuckusRuckus Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    This wouldn't have happened if we had just stuck with ASCII porn. It's probably all the three hour HD orgies' fault.

    Ruckus on
  • SeriouslySeriously Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    The internet actually is a series of tubes.

    Actually pipes. The actual INTERNET looks like a borg cube. But now some of those pipes are starting to spring leaks. Bursting, shooting steam, klaxons blaring. Engineers and repair men frantically trying to seal the breaches.


    tshhhh

    tshhhhh

    Seriously on
  • BedlamBedlam Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Knob I cant detect enough sarcasm from you yet.

    Mistype some of those words so I feel even more dumb about it.

    Bedlam on
  • Filler Inc.Filler Inc. Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Guys this is a serious issue.

    I'm scared to upload the graph that explains why this is serious, but you have to trust me, it is very serious.

    Think waterworld, but with the internet instead.

    Filler Inc. on
  • TheySlashThemTheySlashThem Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    man what are they even

    who did this study?

    who paid for this bullshit?

    TheySlashThem on
  • KnobKnob TURN THE BEAT BACK InternetModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited November 2007
    Guys this is a serious issue.

    I'm scared to upload the graph that explains why this is serious, but you have to trust me, it is very serious.

    Think waterworld, but with the internet instead.

    it'll be fine

    we can just put seawater in the pee-filtering machine

    Knob on
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    man what are they even

    who did this study?

    who paid for this bullshit?
    They will recommend a tiered internet to pay for the 70 billion.
    Evil ISP empire paid for this, I guarantee it.

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • casper_27dcasper_27d The Friendly Ghost EverywhereRegistered User regular
    edited November 2007
    I object;

    Without myspace how are modern youth supposed to socialize. What do you expect them to do, actually go out and meet real people?

    casper_27d on
  • SeriouslySeriously Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Someone is going to have to crawl into a contaminated jeffries tube to seal the main breach. They will not make it back alive.

    Seriously on
  • Blip2004Blip2004 Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Warriors of the Net is one of the wierdest movies I have had to watch for school and the really strange part is that it actually makes the comparison of packets being transmitted and trucks on a road fairly well and accurate. Except for the one part where there are packets that look like police cars doing a high speed chase. I have no idea what concept they were trying to convey.

    found the movie http://www.warriorsofthe.net/movie.html I was wrong about Road being in the title.

    Blip2004 on
  • Filler Inc.Filler Inc. Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Knob wrote: »
    Guys this is a serious issue.

    I'm scared to upload the graph that explains why this is serious, but you have to trust me, it is very serious.

    Think waterworld, but with the internet instead.

    it'll be fine

    we can just put seawater in the pee-filtering machine

    Oh that's your answer for everything.

    Filler Inc. on
  • KnobKnob TURN THE BEAT BACK InternetModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited November 2007
    maybe

    the comparison falls apart when you compare the cost of building a highway to laying more cable and upgrading servers

    Knob on
  • RuckusRuckus Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Seriously wrote: »
    Someone is going to have to crawl into a contaminated jeffries tube to seal the main breach. They will not make it back alive.

    You may die but at least you'll die knowing that I passed the exam.

    Ruckus on
  • SquashuaSquashua __BANNED USERS regular
    edited November 2007
    Guys this is a serious issue.

    I'm scared to upload the graph that explains why this is serious, but you have to trust me, it is very serious.

    Think waterworld, but with the internet instead.

    It's ok. I just tattoo'ed a map of the internet on the back of a fat guy.

    Squashua on
  • RuckusRuckus Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Squashua wrote: »
    Guys this is a serious issue.

    I'm scared to upload the graph that explains why this is serious, but you have to trust me, it is very serious.

    Think waterworld, but with the internet instead.

    It's ok. I just tattoo'ed a map of the internet on the back of a fat guy.

    He better have a neckbeard and a cape.

    Ruckus on
  • AirAir Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    we cant go back to the way things were

    human interaction
    real communities
    learning through collaboration

    its all a bunch of bullshit and if we arent careful we will be reduced to talking to one of those fake conversation bots to fight the withdrawal

    Air on
    darjeelingshortsig95.jpg
  • Bendery It Like BeckhamBendery It Like Beckham Hopeless Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Knob wrote: »
    maybe

    the comparison falls apart when you compare the cost of building a highway to laying more cable and upgrading servers

    Cat-5 is fucking expensive, and forget that cat-6 shit that's like spun gold.

    Bendery It Like Beckham on
  • BerkBerk THE BUDGIE SMUGGLER Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    INTERNET.jpg

    Berk on
    sig-1.jpg
  • MeissnerdMeissnerd Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Poor internet :(

    Meissnerd on
  • Green LanternGreen Lantern Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Oh Berk you are so wonderful

    Green Lantern on
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    man what are they even

    who did this study?

    who paid for this bullshit?
    They will recommend a tiered internet to pay for the 70 billion.
    Evil ISP empire paid for this, I guarantee it.

    I really don't have a problem with tiered access.

    If I wanna drive all the fuck over the nation's highways, I end up paying a lot of tolls. There's no reason that a person should be able to spam out (and/or receive) unlimited data for a flat rate. Makes no sense.

    Defender on
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Knob wrote: »
    maybe

    the comparison falls apart when you compare the cost of building a highway to laying more cable and upgrading servers

    I'm not seeing why; the increased cost of maintaining extra infrastructure is brought on by increased usage of the existing infrastructure.

    The numbers aren't the same, but the concept of "increased cost to match increased use" holds.

    Defender on
  • Sars_BoySars_Boy Rest, You Are The Lightning. Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    BEEEEEEERK

    Sars_Boy on
  • CrossBusterCrossBuster Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    God dammit, Berk.

    That is great.

    CrossBuster on
    penguins.png
  • HylianZoraHylianZora Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Seriously wrote: »
    Someone is going to have to crawl into a contaminated jeffries tube to seal the main breach. They will not make it back alive.
    I nominate that idiot that tried to sell us his keychains earlier.
    Or Berk.

    HylianZora on
    My Pokemon Diamond FC is 4253 0208 2286
    believe2.png
  • KnobKnob TURN THE BEAT BACK InternetModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited November 2007
    Defender wrote: »
    Knob wrote: »
    maybe

    the comparison falls apart when you compare the cost of building a highway to laying more cable and upgrading servers

    I'm not seeing why; the increased cost of maintaining extra infrastructure is brought on by increased usage of the existing infrastructure.

    The numbers aren't the same, but the concept of "increased cost to match increased use" holds.

    right, i'm saying that owing to size and cost it's far easier to create new 'internet pipes' than it is to create new highways. A highway gets congested enough and it turns to shit and takes eages to fix and lay new highways. Installing new fiber optic is cheaper and faster so the odds of a critical shutdown from overuse is laughable.

    Knob on
  • MKRMKR Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Bus topology is like a series of tubes, token ring is a merry-go-round, and the internet is more like an elaborate series of ropes and pullies.

    MKR on
  • DefenderDefender Registered User regular
    edited November 2007
    Knob wrote: »
    Defender wrote: »
    Knob wrote: »
    maybe

    the comparison falls apart when you compare the cost of building a highway to laying more cable and upgrading servers

    I'm not seeing why; the increased cost of maintaining extra infrastructure is brought on by increased usage of the existing infrastructure.

    The numbers aren't the same, but the concept of "increased cost to match increased use" holds.

    right, i'm saying that owing to size and cost it's far easier to create new 'internet pipes' than it is to create new highways. A highway gets congested enough and it turns to shit and takes eages to fix and lay new highways. Installing new fiber optic is cheaper and faster so the odds of a critical shutdown from overuse is laughable.

    Oh oh yeah. A gridlock condition like that is totally laughable, given how fast and cheap it would be to fix, and how far we actually are from it. OK.

    I also don't get why people are always shitting on the "series of tubes" analogy. It's a good analogy! Hell, I've heard more than one person with a PhD in computer science, in some cases teaching courses on networking, use a "water going through pipes" analogy. For an old senator, probably with no computer science experience whatsoever, the "tubes" analogy is pretty damn accurate. (I know you didn't shit on that analogy, but someone else in the thread kinda made a derisive reference to it.)

    Defender on
Sign In or Register to comment.