The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Increasing internet access and new capacity-intensive uses like streaming, interactive videos and shared music files are pushing the system toward gridlock, a U.S. study warns.
We need to know where the internets are so we can clean out the tubes.
Also to wash the truck.
And defrag the blagoblog.
Bedlam on
0
KnobTURN THE BEAT BACKInternetModeratorMod Emeritus
edited November 2007
now for the next week i have to hear from ignorant shits about how there's too much stuff on the internet and i need to stop putting stuff on it or it'll break
Knob on
0
KnobTURN THE BEAT BACKInternetModeratorMod Emeritus
Actually pipes. The actual INTERNET looks like a borg cube. But now some of those pipes are starting to spring leaks. Bursting, shooting steam, klaxons blaring. Engineers and repair men frantically trying to seal the breaches.
Warriors of the Net is one of the wierdest movies I have had to watch for school and the really strange part is that it actually makes the comparison of packets being transmitted and trucks on a road fairly well and accurate. Except for the one part where there are packets that look like police cars doing a high speed chase. I have no idea what concept they were trying to convey.
They will recommend a tiered internet to pay for the 70 billion.
Evil ISP empire paid for this, I guarantee it.
I really don't have a problem with tiered access.
If I wanna drive all the fuck over the nation's highways, I end up paying a lot of tolls. There's no reason that a person should be able to spam out (and/or receive) unlimited data for a flat rate. Makes no sense.
the comparison falls apart when you compare the cost of building a highway to laying more cable and upgrading servers
I'm not seeing why; the increased cost of maintaining extra infrastructure is brought on by increased usage of the existing infrastructure.
The numbers aren't the same, but the concept of "increased cost to match increased use" holds.
right, i'm saying that owing to size and cost it's far easier to create new 'internet pipes' than it is to create new highways. A highway gets congested enough and it turns to shit and takes eages to fix and lay new highways. Installing new fiber optic is cheaper and faster so the odds of a critical shutdown from overuse is laughable.
the comparison falls apart when you compare the cost of building a highway to laying more cable and upgrading servers
I'm not seeing why; the increased cost of maintaining extra infrastructure is brought on by increased usage of the existing infrastructure.
The numbers aren't the same, but the concept of "increased cost to match increased use" holds.
right, i'm saying that owing to size and cost it's far easier to create new 'internet pipes' than it is to create new highways. A highway gets congested enough and it turns to shit and takes eages to fix and lay new highways. Installing new fiber optic is cheaper and faster so the odds of a critical shutdown from overuse is laughable.
Oh oh yeah. A gridlock condition like that is totally laughable, given how fast and cheap it would be to fix, and how far we actually are from it. OK.
I also don't get why people are always shitting on the "series of tubes" analogy. It's a good analogy! Hell, I've heard more than one person with a PhD in computer science, in some cases teaching courses on networking, use a "water going through pipes" analogy. For an old senator, probably with no computer science experience whatsoever, the "tubes" analogy is pretty damn accurate. (I know you didn't shit on that analogy, but someone else in the thread kinda made a derisive reference to it.)
Posts
Just sayin'.
This is fine.
But where will people store their retarded gifs and shock images?
You can't fill up the
you know what, nevermind
The one stamped INTERNET
I heard they put it in the ocean.
We need to know where the internets are so we can clean out the tubes.
Also to wash the truck.
And defrag the blagoblog.
HAHAHAHA LIKE WHAT THAT GUY SAID THAT ONE TIME!
HAHAHAH LOOK OUT OSCAR WILDE!
Actually pipes. The actual INTERNET looks like a borg cube. But now some of those pipes are starting to spring leaks. Bursting, shooting steam, klaxons blaring. Engineers and repair men frantically trying to seal the breaches.
tshhhh
tshhhhh
Mistype some of those words so I feel even more dumb about it.
I'm scared to upload the graph that explains why this is serious, but you have to trust me, it is very serious.
Think waterworld, but with the internet instead.
who did this study?
who paid for this bullshit?
it'll be fine
we can just put seawater in the pee-filtering machine
Evil ISP empire paid for this, I guarantee it.
Without myspace how are modern youth supposed to socialize. What do you expect them to do, actually go out and meet real people?
found the movie http://www.warriorsofthe.net/movie.html I was wrong about Road being in the title.
Oh that's your answer for everything.
the comparison falls apart when you compare the cost of building a highway to laying more cable and upgrading servers
You may die but at least you'll die knowing that I passed the exam.
It's ok. I just tattoo'ed a map of the internet on the back of a fat guy.
He better have a neckbeard and a cape.
human interaction
real communities
learning through collaboration
its all a bunch of bullshit and if we arent careful we will be reduced to talking to one of those fake conversation bots to fight the withdrawal
Cat-5 is fucking expensive, and forget that cat-6 shit that's like spun gold.
I really don't have a problem with tiered access.
If I wanna drive all the fuck over the nation's highways, I end up paying a lot of tolls. There's no reason that a person should be able to spam out (and/or receive) unlimited data for a flat rate. Makes no sense.
I'm not seeing why; the increased cost of maintaining extra infrastructure is brought on by increased usage of the existing infrastructure.
The numbers aren't the same, but the concept of "increased cost to match increased use" holds.
That is great.
Or Berk.
right, i'm saying that owing to size and cost it's far easier to create new 'internet pipes' than it is to create new highways. A highway gets congested enough and it turns to shit and takes eages to fix and lay new highways. Installing new fiber optic is cheaper and faster so the odds of a critical shutdown from overuse is laughable.
Oh oh yeah. A gridlock condition like that is totally laughable, given how fast and cheap it would be to fix, and how far we actually are from it. OK.
I also don't get why people are always shitting on the "series of tubes" analogy. It's a good analogy! Hell, I've heard more than one person with a PhD in computer science, in some cases teaching courses on networking, use a "water going through pipes" analogy. For an old senator, probably with no computer science experience whatsoever, the "tubes" analogy is pretty damn accurate. (I know you didn't shit on that analogy, but someone else in the thread kinda made a derisive reference to it.)