The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
Thanks. I don't even have a damn radio.
I use my cellphone.
NPR has a broadcast number? Or do you mean using the stream via your phone?
For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
Thanks. I don't even have a damn radio.
I use my cellphone.
You can do that? Should I just get on my rascal now, or is there something I'm missing?
Ah. I have an iPod touch + BlackBerry 8703e on me, no radio there. There isn't much radio here worth listening to anyway. The student station advertises themselves as having "more pretentious music".
I want to see Hillary get taken down a few notches.
I want to see such meaningful depth on the various policy proposals and issues from this public radio debate that it puts cable media to such repentant shame that Wolf Blitzer weeps crimson tears of agony whilst ripping out fistfulls of his beard live in the situation room asking for forgiveness and penance from the journalism gods as Jack Cafferty looks on, laughing.
That, or the issue of infrastructure retention, repair, and advancement be given a good bit of time given its absence of prior debates. You know, either or.
moniker on
0
HarrierThe Star Spangled ManRegistered Userregular
edited December 2007
Will there be an audience?
This format is actually something I can look forward to. We're so prone to judging people, politicians no less than most, by their appearance, which is only natural but can become a focus it has no place being. I'll be interested to judge the candidates' responses to questions without having said judgments impaired by whether they're fidgeting or what color their tie is.
Harrier on
I don't wanna kill anybody. I don't like bullies. I don't care where they're from.
Current theory holds that Nixon only lost his presidential election to Kennedy because of his shitty t.v. appearance as compared to Kennedy's charm. So getting back, however weakly, to when our only method of judging a candidate was by his words, will be refreshing.
Kucinich will probably seem more appealing, for one.
I harness a vague hope that the candidates will assume that lazy Americans glued in front of their TVs will not be watching this debate, and thus they will tailor their responses to contain more arguments and less pithy soundbites.
Then again, talk radio is usually an abomination, so who knows.
ElJeffe on
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
What is the point of a radio debate vs a televised one?
It's on the radio? It allows you to focus on the words coming out of their mouths, not cut shots to the moderator or audience reactions. There is much less glamor and more focus on the facts.
Current theory holds that Nixon only lost his presidential election to Kennedy because of his shitty t.v. appearance as compared to Kennedy's charm. So getting back, however weakly, to when our only method of judging a candidate was by his words, will be refreshing.
Kucinich will probably seem more appealing, for one.
No, actually, he only won because of some very democratic cemeteries in Chicago. Never understimate the influence of the zombie vote.
That debate was also the first one in color, which Nixon's advisors had not properly taken into account. Nixon didn't pop off the screen like Kennedy did.
Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.
That debate was also the first one in color, which Nixon's advisors had not properly taken into account. Nixon didn't pop off the screen like Kennedy did.
Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.
Nixon more melted off the screen than popped.
ElJeffe on
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
That debate was also the first one in color, which Nixon's advisors had not properly taken into account. Nixon didn't pop off the screen like Kennedy did.
Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.
That debate was also the first one in color, which Nixon's advisors had not properly taken into account. Nixon didn't pop off the screen like Kennedy did.
Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.
If the best you can come up with against someone who's patently ignorant is to yell back at him, "Yeah? Well there's BOOKS, and they say you're WRONG!"
Then honestly you're not coming out of this looking great either.
How hard do you think it'd be to get a question in on one of these debates? They all seem to be accepting questions from the general public.
Does your question make for a good soundbite and contain no real poignancy whatsoever? Then you stand a chance. Just make sure the question involves no nuance. If you actively demand a simple yes or no answer in your question, I think it triples the odds of it being selected. Something like, "Yes or no, do you support the use of military force?"
ElJeffe on
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
How hard do you think it'd be to get a question in on one of these debates? They all seem to be accepting questions from the general public.
Does your question make for a good soundbite and contain no real poignancy whatsoever? Then you stand a chance. Just make sure the question involves no nuance. If you actively demand a simple yes or no answer in your question, I think it triples the odds of it being selected. Something like, "Yes or no, do you support the use of military force?"
Don't forget about blatantly biased questions which allows the channel to wash its hands of the editorializing. Afterall, some people want to know. Not us of course, because we're totally not biased dicks, but those people over there. Hoo boy, what assholes they are. And they need equal representation and time before our national audience.
A gound soundbyte I can make. Then again, I think only NPR would have the balls to feild a question about IP Law/copyright that didn't take the side of the major music/movie/software outfits and it seems they've already closed their section for questions.
If the best you can come up with against someone who's patently ignorant is to yell back at him, "Yeah? Well there's BOOKS, and they say you're WRONG!"
Then honestly you're not coming out of this looking great either.
How hard do you think it'd be to get a question in on one of these debates? They all seem to be accepting questions from the general public.
Does your question make for a good soundbite and contain no real poignancy whatsoever? Then you stand a chance. Just make sure the question involves no nuance. If you actively demand a simple yes or no answer in your question, I think it triples the odds of it being selected. Something like, "Yes or no, do you support the use of military force?"
bonus points if it creates a running "controversy" for the pundits to talk about for the next 48 hours.
geckahn on
0
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
edited December 2007
I'll be in class for half of it, so give highlights!
I think that the internet has been for years on the path to creating what is essentially an electronic Necronomicon: A collection of blasphemous unrealities so perverse that to even glimpse at its contents, if but for a moment, is to irrevocably forfeit a portion of your sanity.
Xbox - PearlBlueS0ul, Steam
If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.
I think that the internet has been for years on the path to creating what is essentially an electronic Necronomicon: A collection of blasphemous unrealities so perverse that to even glimpse at its contents, if but for a moment, is to irrevocably forfeit a portion of your sanity.
Xbox - PearlBlueS0ul, Steam
If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.
Posts
Oh well. It had at least be better than the last one or I will be angry.
I use my cellphone.
NPR has a broadcast number? Or do you mean using the stream via your phone?
You can do that? Should I just get on my rascal now, or is there something I'm missing?
/thread derailment
I want to see such meaningful depth on the various policy proposals and issues from this public radio debate that it puts cable media to such repentant shame that Wolf Blitzer weeps crimson tears of agony whilst ripping out fistfulls of his beard live in the situation room asking for forgiveness and penance from the journalism gods as Jack Cafferty looks on, laughing.
That, or the issue of infrastructure retention, repair, and advancement be given a good bit of time given its absence of prior debates. You know, either or.
This format is actually something I can look forward to. We're so prone to judging people, politicians no less than most, by their appearance, which is only natural but can become a focus it has no place being. I'll be interested to judge the candidates' responses to questions without having said judgments impaired by whether they're fidgeting or what color their tie is.
Kucinich will probably seem more appealing, for one.
I doubt this. Trust me, it's not his lack of good looks that makes him unappealing.
If it was, he could just have his wife as arm candy at every debate.
MWO: Adamski
Then again, talk radio is usually an abomination, so who knows.
EDIT: ElJeffe said it better.
Fail.
No, actually, he only won because of some very democratic cemeteries in Chicago. Never understimate the influence of the zombie vote.
Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.
Nixon more melted off the screen than popped.
Use the stream that werehippy provided, that's what I'll be doing once I'm at work.
Elizabeth Kucinich?
Does your question make for a good soundbite and contain no real poignancy whatsoever? Then you stand a chance. Just make sure the question involves no nuance. If you actively demand a simple yes or no answer in your question, I think it triples the odds of it being selected. Something like, "Yes or no, do you support the use of military force?"
Don't forget about blatantly biased questions which allows the channel to wash its hands of the editorializing. Afterall, some people want to know. Not us of course, because we're totally not biased dicks, but those people over there. Hoo boy, what assholes they are. And they need equal representation and time before our national audience.
bonus points if it creates a running "controversy" for the pundits to talk about for the next 48 hours.
If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.
If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.