The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Democratic Debates: NOW LIVE!

ElkiElki get busyModerator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
edited December 2007 in Debate and/or Discourse
Moving pictures? Bah! Good ol' radio is the one for me.


Location: The State Historical Society of Iowa in Des Moines.

Network: NPR

Date & Time: December 4th, 2 P.M. EST

Candidates: The press release says "all major candidates are confirmed" so I'm listing all 8 involved.

Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton
Chris Dodd
John Edwards
Mike Gravel
Dennis Kucinich
Barack Obama

Moderators: Steve Inskeep, Michele Norris and Robert Siegel.

Webstream: www.npr.com



If it doesn't involve the debates, don't post it here.

smCQ5WE.jpg
Elki on
«13456

Posts

  • werehippywerehippy Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.

    werehippy on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    werehippy wrote: »
    For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
    Thanks. I don't even have a damn radio.

    Satan. on
  • DukiDuki Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Fuck yeah another one.

    Oh well. It had at least be better than the last one or I will be angry.

    Duki on
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited December 2007
    werehippy wrote: »
    For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
    Thanks. I don't even have a damn radio.

    I use my cellphone.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I want to see Hillary get taken down a few notches.

    Thanatos on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    Elki wrote: »
    werehippy wrote: »
    For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
    Thanks. I don't even have a damn radio.

    I use my cellphone.

    NPR has a broadcast number? Or do you mean using the stream via your phone?

    Satan. on
  • werehippywerehippy Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Elki wrote: »
    werehippy wrote: »
    For the lazy, I believe the online streaming can be found at this link by clicking on the Listen to a stream of NPR programming half way down the page.
    Thanks. I don't even have a damn radio.

    I use my cellphone.

    You can do that? Should I just get on my rascal now, or is there something I'm missing?

    werehippy on
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited December 2007
    I meant my phone has AM/FM radio. :P

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    Ah. I have an iPod touch + BlackBerry 8703e on me, no radio there. There isn't much radio here worth listening to anyway. The student station advertises themselves as having "more pretentious music".

    /thread derailment

    Satan. on
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Thinatos wrote: »
    I want to see Hillary get taken down a few notches.

    I want to see such meaningful depth on the various policy proposals and issues from this public radio debate that it puts cable media to such repentant shame that Wolf Blitzer weeps crimson tears of agony whilst ripping out fistfulls of his beard live in the situation room asking for forgiveness and penance from the journalism gods as Jack Cafferty looks on, laughing.

    That, or the issue of infrastructure retention, repair, and advancement be given a good bit of time given its absence of prior debates. You know, either or.

    moniker on
  • HarrierHarrier The Star Spangled Man Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Will there be an audience?

    This format is actually something I can look forward to. We're so prone to judging people, politicians no less than most, by their appearance, which is only natural but can become a focus it has no place being. I'll be interested to judge the candidates' responses to questions without having said judgments impaired by whether they're fidgeting or what color their tie is.

    Harrier on
    I don't wanna kill anybody. I don't like bullies. I don't care where they're from.
  • JamesKeenanJamesKeenan Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Current theory holds that Nixon only lost his presidential election to Kennedy because of his shitty t.v. appearance as compared to Kennedy's charm. So getting back, however weakly, to when our only method of judging a candidate was by his words, will be refreshing.

    Kucinich will probably seem more appealing, for one.

    JamesKeenan on
  • geckahngeckahn Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Kucinich will probably seem more appealing, for one.

    I doubt this. Trust me, it's not his lack of good looks that makes him unappealing.

    geckahn on
  • Gnome-InterruptusGnome-Interruptus Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    geckahn wrote: »
    Kucinich will probably seem more appealing, for one.

    I doubt this. Trust me, it's not his lack of good looks that makes him unappealing.

    If it was, he could just have his wife as arm candy at every debate.

    Gnome-Interruptus on
    steam_sig.png
    MWO: Adamski
  • LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Dammit I have a final tomorrow to study for while this airs... D:

    Lanz on
    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • edited December 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • LondonBridgeLondonBridge __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    What is the point of a radio debate vs a televised one?

    LondonBridge on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    I harness a vague hope that the candidates will assume that lazy Americans glued in front of their TVs will not be watching this debate, and thus they will tailor their responses to contain more arguments and less pithy soundbites.

    Then again, talk radio is usually an abomination, so who knows.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    What is the point of a radio debate vs a televised one?
    It's on the radio? It allows you to focus on the words coming out of their mouths, not cut shots to the moderator or audience reactions. There is much less glamor and more focus on the facts.

    EDIT: ElJeffe said it better.

    Satan. on
  • KungFuKungFu Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Man, Im gonna be at work.

    Fail.

    KungFu on
    Theft 4 Bread
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Current theory holds that Nixon only lost his presidential election to Kennedy because of his shitty t.v. appearance as compared to Kennedy's charm. So getting back, however weakly, to when our only method of judging a candidate was by his words, will be refreshing.

    Kucinich will probably seem more appealing, for one.

    No, actually, he only won because of some very democratic cemeteries in Chicago. Never understimate the influence of the zombie vote.

    moniker on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    That debate was also the first one in color, which Nixon's advisors had not properly taken into account. Nixon didn't pop off the screen like Kennedy did.

    Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.

    Satan. on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    That debate was also the first one in color, which Nixon's advisors had not properly taken into account. Nixon didn't pop off the screen like Kennedy did.

    Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.

    Nixon more melted off the screen than popped.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited December 2007
    Bumpity.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • FunkyWaltDoggFunkyWaltDogg Columbia, SCRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I wish I'd remembered to bring a radio to work today.

    FunkyWaltDogg on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    I wish I'd remembered to bring a radio to work today.

    Use the stream that werehippy provided, that's what I'll be doing once I'm at work.

    Satan. on
  • deowolfdeowolf is allowed to do that. Traffic.Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    That debate was also the first one in color, which Nixon's advisors had not properly taken into account. Nixon didn't pop off the screen like Kennedy did.

    Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.

    Elizabeth Kucinich?

    deowolf on
    [SIGPIC]acocoSig.jpg[/SIGPIC]
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    deowolf wrote: »
    That debate was also the first one in color, which Nixon's advisors had not properly taken into account. Nixon didn't pop off the screen like Kennedy did.

    Also, nothing can make Kucinich seem more appealing.

    Elizabeth Kucinich?
    God damnit.

    Satan. on
  • Fallout2manFallout2man Vault Dweller Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    How hard do you think it'd be to get a question in on one of these debates? They all seem to be accepting questions from the general public.

    Fallout2man on
    On Ignorance:
    Kana wrote:
    If the best you can come up with against someone who's patently ignorant is to yell back at him, "Yeah? Well there's BOOKS, and they say you're WRONG!"

    Then honestly you're not coming out of this looking great either.
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited December 2007
    How hard do you think it'd be to get a question in on one of these debates? They all seem to be accepting questions from the general public.

    Does your question make for a good soundbite and contain no real poignancy whatsoever? Then you stand a chance. Just make sure the question involves no nuance. If you actively demand a simple yes or no answer in your question, I think it triples the odds of it being selected. Something like, "Yes or no, do you support the use of military force?"

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    How hard do you think it'd be to get a question in on one of these debates? They all seem to be accepting questions from the general public.

    Does your question make for a good soundbite and contain no real poignancy whatsoever? Then you stand a chance. Just make sure the question involves no nuance. If you actively demand a simple yes or no answer in your question, I think it triples the odds of it being selected. Something like, "Yes or no, do you support the use of military force?"

    Don't forget about blatantly biased questions which allows the channel to wash its hands of the editorializing. Afterall, some people want to know. Not us of course, because we're totally not biased dicks, but those people over there. Hoo boy, what assholes they are. And they need equal representation and time before our national audience.

    moniker on
  • Fallout2manFallout2man Vault Dweller Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    A gound soundbyte I can make. Then again, I think only NPR would have the balls to feild a question about IP Law/copyright that didn't take the side of the major music/movie/software outfits and it seems they've already closed their section for questions. :|

    Fallout2man on
    On Ignorance:
    Kana wrote:
    If the best you can come up with against someone who's patently ignorant is to yell back at him, "Yeah? Well there's BOOKS, and they say you're WRONG!"

    Then honestly you're not coming out of this looking great either.
  • geckahngeckahn Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    How hard do you think it'd be to get a question in on one of these debates? They all seem to be accepting questions from the general public.

    Does your question make for a good soundbite and contain no real poignancy whatsoever? Then you stand a chance. Just make sure the question involves no nuance. If you actively demand a simple yes or no answer in your question, I think it triples the odds of it being selected. Something like, "Yes or no, do you support the use of military force?"

    bonus points if it creates a running "controversy" for the pundits to talk about for the next 48 hours.

    geckahn on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I'll be in class for half of it, so give highlights!

    Fencingsax on
  • Satan.Satan. __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    I'll be in class for half of it, so give highlights!
    Obama and Hilary are apparently in a slap fight. Oh man, you should be hearing this!

    Satan. on
  • geckahngeckahn Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Oh noes, NPR voices . . . I'm getting sleepy already.

    geckahn on
  • DogDog Registered User, Administrator, Vanilla Staff admin
    edited December 2007
    Its 11am Pacific and that stream is still doing the news. Also no news stories about an impending debate. Are we sure this debat exists?

    Unknown User on
  • an_altan_alt Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Hmmm... wanting ideas and sticking to three topics if I understand it correctly. This could be good, but it will probably still find a way to suck.

    an_alt on
    Pony wrote:
    I think that the internet has been for years on the path to creating what is essentially an electronic Necronomicon: A collection of blasphemous unrealities so perverse that to even glimpse at its contents, if but for a moment, is to irrevocably forfeit a portion of your sanity.
    Xbox - PearlBlueS0ul, Steam
    If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.
  • an_altan_alt Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Yes, it exists. They're just doing the news first.

    an_alt on
    Pony wrote:
    I think that the internet has been for years on the path to creating what is essentially an electronic Necronomicon: A collection of blasphemous unrealities so perverse that to even glimpse at its contents, if but for a moment, is to irrevocably forfeit a portion of your sanity.
    Xbox - PearlBlueS0ul, Steam
    If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited December 2007
    I think it's about to start.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.