The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Video Game Violence, My Girlfriend, and my infant son...- SOLVED!

SesphohemeSesphoheme Registered User regular
edited January 2008 in Help / Advice Forum
I need a second opinion on a horrible subject I'm sure.
Vent, Vent, Vent.

So, my son is sitting in a bouncer in the Game Room beside me while I'm playing COD4. My son is just an infant at merely 6 months old. Lately, his mother, my girlfriend, has been being some what of a pain. (She doesn't mind it when I play video games, but don't allow my son to watch VIOLENT ones.)

Okay. She says it's okay to let him watch Viva Pinata, while I play, as opposed to COD4 or any of the Halo games. If you've ever played Viva Pinata, you'd understand why I would actually bring that up in this post.

Anyone else had problems with parents/girlfriends/wives feelings of children watching/playing games with violence? If so, please tell me how you got it to stop... Or, how I might go about putting some flowers or cotton candy in Halo 3.


(PS: I've tried taping it to the TV screen.)

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sesphoheme on

Posts

  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2008
    Man, if you play COD4 or Halo 3 the way I do it would be a bad idea to have any infant sons nearby.

    Deviant Hands on
  • SesphohemeSesphoheme Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Man, if you play COD4 or Halo 3 the way I do it would be a bad idea to have any infant sons nearby.

    I'm not a violent gamer myself, if that's what you mean.

    I just play in my leisure, for fun.

    Seldom do I cuss or get mad at games...

    Sesphoheme on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • drhazarddrhazard Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    I personally think a game like COD4 is pretty much too visually and aurally intense for an infant, even if it weren't a game about shooting a variety of people. Viva Pinata may have cutesy bright animals eating other cutesy bright animals, but it doesn't do it at nearly the same speed and sound level. Arguments over content aside, you've probably got to stop it around the child. And if you expect to be a father to this child, you have to realize that, sometimes, you have to put the concerns of the child's development over your leisure time.

    drhazard on
    SCB.jpg
  • Chief1138Chief1138 Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    At that age he probably has no idea what's going on in the game you're playing but still, it doesn't sound like mom is being all that unreasonable. You don't routinely subject him to violent R-rated movies, do you? Would it be possible for you to place him elsewhere while you play?

    Chief1138 on
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2008
    I always have sound blasting and walls shaking when I play COD4. Sometimes it's just so intense I have to stop playing for a while. To take a break.

    Deviant Hands on
  • SesphohemeSesphoheme Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    drhazard wrote: »
    I personally think a game like COD4 is pretty much too visually and aurally intense for an infant, even if it weren't a game about shooting a variety of people. Viva Pinata may have cutesy bright animals eating other cutesy bright animals, but it doesn't do it at nearly the same speed and sound level. Arguments over content aside, you've probably got to stop it around the child. And if you expect to be a father to this child, you have to realize that, sometimes, you have to put the concerns of the child's development over your leisure time.

    I've never thought of it that way before.... the speed of the movement and all... I understand your point here. Which means the post is solved.

    My baby was born very premature, and he's developing much slower than children his age. (At the rate of a 3 month old, to be exact.) I'd hate to be selfish and jeopardize his well-being, because of a silly feud between my girlfriend and I. I'll at least wait until his vision is a little stronger, to introduce him to games as such.

    Thanks for helping, drhazard.

    Sesphoheme on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • aesiraesir __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2008
    wear headphones. Turn the baby away from the TV.

    aesir on
  • Cold KoalaCold Koala Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    don't introduce him to cod4 and gears of war and such when you DO introduce him to video games. give him like pac-man or tetris or something. whatever they play these days.

    Cold Koala on
  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Sesphoheme wrote: »
    drhazard wrote: »
    I personally think a game like COD4 is pretty much too visually and aurally intense for an infant, even if it weren't a game about shooting a variety of people. Viva Pinata may have cutesy bright animals eating other cutesy bright animals, but it doesn't do it at nearly the same speed and sound level. Arguments over content aside, you've probably got to stop it around the child. And if you expect to be a father to this child, you have to realize that, sometimes, you have to put the concerns of the child's development over your leisure time.

    I've never thought of it that way before.... the speed of the movement and all... I understand your point here. Which means the post is solved.

    My baby was born very premature, and he's developing much slower than children his age. (At the rate of a 3 month old, to be exact.) I'd hate to be selfish and jeopardize his well-being, because of a silly feud between my girlfriend and I. I'll at least wait until his vision is a little stronger, to introduce him to games as such.

    Thanks for helping, drhazard.

    i know this is "solved" but i think the larger problem is that your only caveat about allowing your infant son to watch call of duty is that "the speed of the movement and all" would be too much for a baby. i think the larger issue here which your girlfriend is worried about and that you disagree with is the actual violent content of the game.

    granted, it's an infant. there probably isn't a whole lot a baby that young is going to pick up in terms of actual thematics from the game. but do you really want your son exposed to that kind of violence in terms of explosions, screams, and straight up killing people? i'm not usally one to say that watching something violent causes violence, but at some point you have to know what's appropriate, no matter how young your kid is.

    your girlfriend is right, call of duty is too violent for your kid to be watching at that age, and the fact that you try and justify things by saying "well he was born premature so its okay, he's not developed enough for me to mess him up yet" is just creepy. the solution isn't "imma gonna wait till his eyes get good enough to easily view me blowing shit up on the tv" it's "hey, maybe i should put the violent video games away while my son is around until he's is old enough to appreciate them in the proper context"

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • EgosEgos Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    if it i had to be honest I would say exposing a child to "Super Mario Galaxy" is the way to a healthy adulthood :) I'm serious that game just seems so happy.. and hell I have fun playing it and I'm well....relatively older :mrgreen: ....too bad wiis are hard to get or so I hear

    Egos on
  • LadyMLadyM Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Man, six-month-olds can pick up a surprising amount of information for being tiny munchkin-people. I was singing songs by six months.

    Just wait he's in bed, or play while he's napping in a different part of the house.
    My baby was born very premature, and he's developing much slower than children his age. (At the rate of a 3 month old, to be exact.) I'd hate to be selfish and jeopardize his well-being, because of a silly feud between my girlfriend and I. I'll at least wait until his vision is a little stronger, to introduce him to games as such.

    Dude, don't expose an infant or small child to a violent game. Even an infant with "strong vision." That's stupid. You wouldn't watch porn with him sitting you next to you on the couch, right?

    LadyM on
  • DrFrylockDrFrylock Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Just curious, does anybody know whether there's any data to back up these assertions or is it all just 'parenting by guessing?' I mean we can speculate all we want about whether violence, loud noises, fast moving images, video games, or watching a TV screen at all is good or bad for a 6-month old child, but these speculations are really irrelevant. Either there is data to support these hypotheses, or there isn't.

    According to two minutes of Google searching, this says that "No research has focused specifically on how violent content affects infants." However, the consensus about infants and television in general is that children that young are not really able to pick out meaning from the TV unless it is presented in a structured, direct way. If this is true, anything more exciting than Sesame Street or the Teletubbies is probably identical to your kid right now.

    It's great that you want to change your lifestyle to accommodate your child, but at least do make decisions in an informed manner based on evidence.

    DrFrylock on
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    The OP may want to re-consider having the child exposed to video screens much at all, be it viva pinata, COD4, or even sesame street. See: http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/08/baby-einstein-t.html

    I don't have any experience raising children, but I think the popular age threshold for permitting children to watch tv for an appreciable amount of time is around 2 years. It may not be best for the child's development to be exposed to high-data audio/visual content that it receives passively from a box, while it's still figuring out how to interact with the world. The subject should be studied more, but the available data indicate that over-exposure to tv at too young an age manifests measureable developmental deficits.

    Djeet on
  • prawnstar69prawnstar69 Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    I have a 7 month old son and I'll play WoW with him on my lap. I wouldn't play CoD with him in his bouncer as even the sound can be a little intense (even at low volumes).

    You could argue that even WoW isn't acceptable but personally I feel it's ok, anything more realistic / violent than that and I wouldn't let him near it.

    I tend to play CoD when he's in bed / out of the house. I usually wear headphones when he's in bed anyway as I don't want to wake him. The office with the PC in is next to his nursery.

    Oh, how our children are going to grow up to be geeks.

    edit - I read that link Djeet, and I'd agree with it, to an extent. I don't like letting my son watch things like Teletubbies, but he does love Balamory (which is non-animated and very dialogue focused).

    prawnstar69 on
    Bana84.png
  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    DrFrylock wrote: »
    It's great that you want to change your lifestyle to accommodate your child, but at least do make decisions in an informed manner based on evidence.

    the problem here isn't really the effects that call of duty or halo might have on a baby, it's more the idea that the OP doesn't seem to think that exposing his son to violence at any age seems to be a problem as long as the kid can handle the physical stimulation of viewing it. at 6 months there probably isn't much of a risk, but that doesn't mean that when he's two years old it suddenly becomes okay.

    the OP needs to realize that kids are impressionable and that yeah, sometimes kids have to be shielded from certain content until they're old enough to understand it.

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • SesphohemeSesphoheme Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Yes, I do happen to be more worried about visual and audio effects on my baby as opposed to content.

    A. He's 6 months old, with the mind of a 3 month old.
    B. Violent vidja games never affected me when I was younger, they didn't affect my brother, and they don't affect my nephew.

    (It's not like I sit and allow my child to watch me play "violent" video games all the time. It's an occasional thing.

    I suppose if one day my son decides to be a serial killer, I'll know why. So Sue me. I'm not going to shelter my child from anything. I trust the way I raise my child will over power something he sees on a video game. Be it violent or educational. Whatever.

    How many of you were exposed to violent video games at a young age. If you were, does that mean you're a horrible person.... Or worse, the person who showed them to you was irresponsible?

    Sesphoheme on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Sesphoheme wrote: »
    How many of you were exposed to violent video games at a young age. If you were, does that mean you're a horrible person.... Or worse, the person who showed them to you was irresponsible?

    i wasn't, but if i were, it'd have made the person showing them to me irresponsible.


    look, if you want a debate about this, there's a forum for that. but you posted this in a help and advice forum, and the general consensus in the thread seems to be that you should be worried about violent content in regards to your young son. what it seems like is that you just wanted a bunch of people on the internets to agree with you and not your girlfriend so you could find ways to get her to stop nagging you.

    unfortunately for you and master chief, she's right. if you really care about your son, you'll take every precaution you can instead of trying to find ways not to change your own lifestyle.


    edit:
    A. He's 6 months old, with the mind of a 3 month old.

    you keep mentioning this, and what frustrates me is that i would bet dollas to doughnuts you keep using this excuse until it becomes beneficial to go the opposite direction.

    "he's two and a half, so he's got the mind of a 15 month old, he can't possibly understand"

    "oh, i know he's only five, but he's so advanced i'm sure he understands things better than most kids his age"


    edit2:

    also, how old are you?

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • Not SarastroNot Sarastro __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2008
    aesir wrote: »
    wear headphones. Turn the baby away from the TV.

    Thread solved in 9 words. The needlessly complex parenting debates in the rest of the posts are fun to read, but OP, if you consult a psych library or scour the internet every time 5 seconds and a bit of common sense will do, the next ten years of your life are going to be hell.

    Not Sarastro on
  • prawnstar69prawnstar69 Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Sesphoheme wrote: »
    How many of you were exposed to violent video games at a young age. If you were, does that mean you're a horrible person.... Or worse, the person who showed them to you was irresponsible?

    They didn't really exist when I was an infant.

    prawnstar69 on
    Bana84.png
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2008
    Sesphoheme wrote: »
    How many of you were exposed to violent video games at a young age.

    I'm pretty sure none of us were.

    Deviant Hands on
  • kaliyamakaliyama Left to find less-moderated fora Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    i think any video stimulation is going to lead to ADD, or at least an underappreciation of books, the outdoors, etc. i'm going to try to fight my own video game hobby/addiction and not keep anything in the house until the kid hits puberty.

    kaliyama on
    fwKS7.png?1
  • Lindsay LohanLindsay Lohan Registered User regular
    edited January 2008
    Personally, I don't worry that much about the whole TV stimulation thing. My son doesn't watch too much TV, but he certainly does watch some - especially in the evenings this time of the year (it's mighty cold up here in January). However, I do not play any games that I consider questionable when he is awake.

    He's 3, currently he can watch (and occassionaly join in) stuff with comic violence - Spiderman, Mario, Zelda, old 2d Virtual Console games, etc. However, stuff like Resident Evil is strictly after bedtime. I was actually really surprised when he told me that Ghost Squad scared him - no blood or anything, just the guys jumping out at the screen. I always play it by how he reacts if it's a game I'm unsure of so Ghost Squad is now an after hours game as well.

    One thing to think about when he/she gets older isn't necessarily "will this game desensitize them to violence" like the media suggests but more "will this game and the images give my kid nightmares?" Frankly, I see that as the bigger issue with really young kids - images of war or monsters may come back to haunt them in the night and you'll feel like absolute crap knowing you caused it just because you wanted some more play time.

    Lindsay Lohan on
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2008
    Kids shouldn't be watching TV until they are at least 2 if you want to avoid ADD and make sure they have proper depth perception and all that.

    Deviant Hands on
Sign In or Register to comment.