As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
We're funding a new Acquisitions Incorporated series on Kickstarter right now! Check it out at https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pennyarcade/acquisitions-incorporated-the-series-2

[WoW] Hunters: Misdirect your attention to this thread.

1626365676882

Posts

  • HamurabiHamurabi MiamiRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    MuddBudd wrote: »
    Wait, I was under the impression that cower barely worked.

    Has this changed?

    Is it suddenly super-effective?

    080504.gif

    Hamurabi on
  • martinimartini Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Imperfect wrote: »
    Pet skills still work if they're just in your skill tab, provided they've been turned on.
    Well, some of them do. I had to open up my spellbook and click on Heart of the Phoenix, even though it was showing as being on auto-cast, and wasn't on cooldown.

    I'm also having trouble with my pets holding aggro even making sure that cower is off. Another hunter in my guild is telling me that it's fine, so long as you MD each mob to your pet. I hate this idea, maybe because I've been playing since release and remember that pets used to be able to hold aggro off of the hunter at the level cap pretty well, for ages (until you were in ~T3 gear). Having to MD every pull is just stupid. :/

    martini on
    I raised the wall. And I will be the one to knock it down.
  • MayGodHaveMercyMayGodHaveMercy Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    martini wrote: »
    Imperfect wrote: »
    Pet skills still work if they're just in your skill tab, provided they've been turned on.
    Well, some of them do. I had to open up my spellbook and click on Heart of the Phoenix, even though it was showing as being on auto-cast, and wasn't on cooldown.

    I believe they changed HotP to not autocast because in 90% of raid circumstances it would just instantly die again, or something like that.

    MayGodHaveMercy on
    XBL: Mercy XXVI - Steam: Mercy_XXVI - PSN: Mercy XXVI
  • TomantaTomanta Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    martini wrote: »
    Imperfect wrote: »
    Pet skills still work if they're just in your skill tab, provided they've been turned on.
    Well, some of them do. I had to open up my spellbook and click on Heart of the Phoenix, even though it was showing as being on auto-cast, and wasn't on cooldown.

    I believe they changed HotP to not autocast because in 90% of raid circumstances it would just instantly die again, or something like that.

    HotP isn't the only skill to appear to autocast but not. I've had Rabid both on my pet bar and in the skill book, both show autocast, but the only time it goes off is if I click it. Which is really a pain, considering that there are far too few buttons on the pet bar now for their abilities.

    Tomanta on
  • MayGodHaveMercyMayGodHaveMercy Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Tomanta wrote: »
    martini wrote: »
    Imperfect wrote: »
    Pet skills still work if they're just in your skill tab, provided they've been turned on.
    Well, some of them do. I had to open up my spellbook and click on Heart of the Phoenix, even though it was showing as being on auto-cast, and wasn't on cooldown.

    I believe they changed HotP to not autocast because in 90% of raid circumstances it would just instantly die again, or something like that.

    HotP isn't the only skill to appear to autocast but not. I've had Rabid both on my pet bar and in the skill book, both show autocast, but the only time it goes off is if I click it. Which is really a pain, considering that there are far too few buttons on the pet bar now for their abilities.

    Yeah, I had the same issue with Rabid, and I'm not sure what the deal is.

    MayGodHaveMercy on
    XBL: Mercy XXVI - Steam: Mercy_XXVI - PSN: Mercy XXVI
  • FugaFuga Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    reVerse wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    A DPS pet has never done so much damage that causing too much threat has been a problem (with growl turned off).

    Looks like someone's never been in a PuG.
    You couldn't be further from the truth, and what are you getting at?

    forty on
    Officially the unluckiest CCG player ever.
  • martinimartini Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    If the skill doesn't auto-cast, like HotP, you shouldn't be able to activate auto-casting on it. I've also heard that since it's a pet skill, you can't drag it onto your bars, and obviously with the pet dead, you can't use it if it's on their bars either... brilliant.

    The Rabid thing must be a bug, I'm hoping that it can be fixed, since it's ridiculous to make hunters micro-manage it.

    martini on
    I raised the wall. And I will be the one to knock it down.
  • StollyStolly Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    martini wrote: »
    If the skill doesn't auto-cast, like HotP, you shouldn't be able to activate auto-casting on it. I've also heard that since it's a pet skill, you can't drag it onto your bars, and obviously with the pet dead, you can't use it if it's on their bars either... brilliant.

    The Rabid thing must be a bug, I'm hoping that it can be fixed, since it's ridiculous to make hunters micro-manage it.

    I have made a simple macro for HotP , /cast Heart of the phoenix, and put it on my hotbars. That works like a charm.

    Rabid can also be worked into a steady shot macro. I use the following that I picked up at EJ.

    #showtooltip Steady Shot
    /console Sound_EnableSFX 0
    /cast Steady Shot
    /cast [target=pettarget,exists] Rabid
    /console Sound_EnableSFX 1

    It works just fine, so far, and it's not a spam macro like the old pre 3.0 ones. I just use it like normal SS.

    Stolly on
  • HamurabiHamurabi MiamiRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    reVerse wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    A DPS pet has never done so much damage that causing too much threat has been a problem (with growl turned off).

    Looks like someone's never been in a PuG.

    Actually... unless Omen was lying, my kitty was behind only a Destro warlock at the #3 position on threat a minute or so into Council tonight, with a 50/11/0 spec.

    Hamurabi on
  • StollyStolly Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    reVerse wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    A DPS pet has never done so much damage that causing too much threat has been a problem (with growl turned off).

    Looks like someone's never been in a PuG.

    Actually... unless Omen was lying, my kitty was behind only a Destro warlock at the #3 position on threat a minute or so into Council tonight, with a 50/11/0 spec.


    With my gimpy 51/10 spec my cat kept overtaking the tanks on threat constantly in ZA, on trash, before I realised growl was annoyingly on in the spellbook. And even afterwards it pu out a ton of threat, with cower off. So it might actually have some uses in raids.

    Stolly on
  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    pets have no negative aggro multipliers, I suppose
    most classes have about -50% aggro with raid specs

    autono-wally, erotibot300 on
    kFJhXwE.jpgkFJhXwE.jpg
  • HamurabiHamurabi MiamiRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Stolly wrote: »
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    reVerse wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    A DPS pet has never done so much damage that causing too much threat has been a problem (with growl turned off).

    Looks like someone's never been in a PuG.

    Actually... unless Omen was lying, my kitty was behind only a Destro warlock at the #3 position on threat a minute or so into Council tonight, with a 50/11/0 spec.


    With my gimpy 51/10 spec my cat kept overtaking the tanks on threat constantly in ZA, on trash, before I realised growl was annoyingly on in the spellbook. And even afterwards it pu out a ton of threat, with cower off. So it might actually have some uses in raids.

    I should clarify: neither Cower nor Growl were on in this case.

    Further clarification: I DC'd once in the middle of that kill, and then for the rest of the night.

    Hamurabi on
  • Coconut MonkeyCoconut Monkey Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    I tended to freak out officers watching the aggro meters when I was raiding on my hunter.

    "Who the fuck is Snagglepuss?"
    *whistles innocently*

    Coconut Monkey on
  • StollyStolly Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    Stolly wrote: »
    Hamurabi wrote: »
    reVerse wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    A DPS pet has never done so much damage that causing too much threat has been a problem (with growl turned off).

    Looks like someone's never been in a PuG.

    Actually... unless Omen was lying, my kitty was behind only a Destro warlock at the #3 position on threat a minute or so into Council tonight, with a 50/11/0 spec.


    With my gimpy 51/10 spec my cat kept overtaking the tanks on threat constantly in ZA, on trash, before I realised growl was annoyingly on in the spellbook. And even afterwards it pu out a ton of threat, with cower off. So it might actually have some uses in raids.

    I should clarify: neither Cower nor Growl were on in this case.

    Further clarification: I DC'd once in the middle of that kill, and then for the rest of the night.


    To clarify my comment. I didn't mean to disagree. I just wanted to add some further anecdotes about how pets put out a lot of threat right now, with or without growl on.

    Stolly on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    pets have no negative aggro multipliers, I suppose
    most classes have about -50% aggro with raid specs
    Tanks still have a huge built in damage->threat modifier. What are these tanks doing that a pet is outdamaging them by like 50%?

    And why do other people seem to be experiencing problems with their pets being unable to hold aggro over them with growl on when they're not even going all out?

    forty on
    Officially the unluckiest CCG player ever.
  • ImperfectImperfect Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Hey, can anyone comment on my build? It's specifically a Gorilladin-levelling build, and the remaining points are going into Marks, except the one at 70, which is going to go into Beast Mastery so I can play around with a Chompasorus for a little bit before spec'ing into a PvP Marks build.

    Imperfect on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    I tamed a Gorilla and I wanted so badly to name him FuriousGeorge.

    It's one letter too long for the name bar.

    :(

    Halfmex on
  • StollyStolly Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    forty wrote: »
    pets have no negative aggro multipliers, I suppose
    most classes have about -50% aggro with raid specs
    Tanks still have a huge built in damage->threat modifier. What are these tanks doing that a pet is outdamaging them by like 50%?

    And why do other people seem to be experiencing problems with their pets being unable to hold aggro over them with growl on when they're not even going all out?


    Well, at my first Gruul after the patch my pet did 900 dps, with growl probably turned on. Now our tanks still out did it on threat on that fight handily, but it was still third or fourth on the threat meter constantly. In ZA it passed the tanks on trash a few times, mostly due to the fact that it was now so easy that the tanks paid less attention at times, but still, for BM hunters the pet can do silly amounts of dps and hence threat.

    Personally I have no problems at all with overggroing when my pet tanks while grinding. It's better than before the patch.

    Stolly on
  • ImperfectImperfect Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    I think you can be excused for calling him "FuriusGeorge". I had one of the undead pigs from EPL and I called him "ForsakenBacn". =)

    Imperfect on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    I almost just left it as FuriousGeorg but I couldn't bring myself to do it. Blast you, Blizzard! Let me have that one extra character on the pet nameplate!

    Halfmex on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Halfmex wrote: »
    I almost just left it as FuriousGeorg but I couldn't bring myself to do it. Blast you, Blizzard! Let me have that one extra character on the pet nameplate!
    Hunter minor glyph go go go!

    forty on
    Officially the unluckiest CCG player ever.
  • ZeroCowZeroCow Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    FuriousJorge? If I spelled that right anyways.

    ZeroCow on
    PSN ID - Buckeye_Bert
    Magic Online - Bertro
  • BigityBigity Lubbock, TXRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Hm, funny and probably will be reported for racism! I like it.

    Bigity on
  • Paradox ControlParadox Control Master MC Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    WORNG THREAD!
    all you wow threads look a like.

    Paradox Control on
    \
  • MayGodHaveMercyMayGodHaveMercy Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Stolly wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    pets have no negative aggro multipliers, I suppose
    most classes have about -50% aggro with raid specs
    Tanks still have a huge built in damage->threat modifier. What are these tanks doing that a pet is outdamaging them by like 50%?

    And why do other people seem to be experiencing problems with their pets being unable to hold aggro over them with growl on when they're not even going all out?


    Well, at my first Gruul after the patch my pet did 900 dps, with growl probably turned on. Now our tanks still out did it on threat on that fight handily, but it was still third or fourth on the threat meter constantly. In ZA it passed the tanks on trash a few times, mostly due to the fact that it was now so easy that the tanks paid less attention at times, but still, for BM hunters the pet can do silly amounts of dps and hence threat.

    Personally I have no problems at all with overggroing when my pet tanks while grinding. It's better than before the patch.

    Your pet did nine hundred DPS? Screens please.

    MayGodHaveMercy on
    XBL: Mercy XXVI - Steam: Mercy_XXVI - PSN: Mercy XXVI
  • cncaudatacncaudata Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Gah, new proxy at work so I can't get to WWS. Last night my scorpid did 727 dps on Rage. I'm specced Marks.

    cncaudata on
    PSN: Broodax- battle.net: broodax#1163
  • HamurabiHamurabi MiamiRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Your pet did nine hundred DPS? Screens please.

    Pet doing 830 DPS.

    Again, I DC'd in the middle of that!

    Hamurabi on
  • MayGodHaveMercyMayGodHaveMercy Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Neat. Sounds like I need to play my hunter again. I've given him like 30 minutes of attention since 3.0 hit. I suppose my pet was probably a pretty fair portion of my 2700 DPS on the fish boss. Didn't even bother to look at the split.

    MayGodHaveMercy on
    XBL: Mercy XXVI - Steam: Mercy_XXVI - PSN: Mercy XXVI
  • Wombat02Wombat02 Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    In TAQ last night I going between 2 and 3 on the DPS meter at about 1400-1600 DPS. The lag was pretty horrible, but I was feeling decent when I saw the other hunter had a good amount of teir 6 and the BT polearm. I am wearing mostly season 2-3 PvP stuff with the 150 badge chicken shooter.

    Wombat02 on
  • ZeroCowZeroCow Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Quick question, with the glyph that reduces the cooldown on multi-shot also reduce the cooldown on aimed shot since they share a timer?

    ZeroCow on
    PSN ID - Buckeye_Bert
    Magic Online - Bertro
  • ValVal Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Prob not .

    Val on
  • ImperfectImperfect Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Nrrrg - I cannot wait until I can get the Glyph of Volley - I swear I'm using up so much mana doing the Gorlliadn thing (which by the way rocks faces).

    Imperfect on
  • Undead ScottsmanUndead Scottsman Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    I can't wait for the Glyph of Bestial Wrath.

    Popping that sucker close to once every minute sounds like too much fun to pass up.

    Fear the giant dino.

    FEAR IT.

    Undead Scottsman on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Fear the giant dino.

    FEAR IT.
    IMMUNE

    forty on
    Officially the unluckiest CCG player ever.
  • ImperfectImperfect Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    forty wrote: »
    Fear the giant dino.

    FEAR IT.
    IMMUNE

    Fuck fuck fuck, whaddo I do now, OH GOT HE'S EATING ME HE'S EATI...

    Imperfect on
  • ArrathArrath Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Imperfect wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    Fear the giant dino.

    FEAR IT.
    IMMUNE

    Fuck fuck fuck, whaddo I do now, OH GOT HE'S EATING ME HE'S EATI...

    Nightmares of Un'goro. D:

    Arrath on
  • HamurabiHamurabi MiamiRegistered User regular
    edited October 2008
    Arrath wrote: »
    Imperfect wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    Fear the giant dino.

    FEAR IT.
    IMMUNE

    Fuck fuck fuck, whaddo I do now, OH GOT HE'S EATING ME HE'S EATI...

    Nightmares of Un'goro. D:

    Waiting till level 71 for mine. Because at least 1/2 GFTT, even while levelling, is too good to pass up.

    Hamurabi on
  • ArrathArrath Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    I personally can't wait until Glyph of Wyvern Sting. Damage decrease? Fuck do I care, I use it for the sleep.

    Arrath on
  • FugaFuga Registered User regular
    edited October 2008
    GFTT?

    Fuga on
This discussion has been closed.