The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Low GPA / Grad School

DistramDistram __BANNED USERS regular
edited February 2008 in Help / Advice Forum
I want to apply for Grad School but I have a sub-par GPA. Am I fucked?

Also, anyone taken the GRE? How well would someone with a poor background in Math do?

Distram on

Posts

  • GdiguyGdiguy San Diego, CARegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Distram wrote: »
    I want to apply for Grad School but I have a sub-par GPA. Am I fucked?

    Also, anyone taken the GRE? How well would someone with a poor background in Math do?

    How poor? The GRE math is a decent bit harder questions than the SAT, but I believe the topic range is pretty much the same (nothing past pre-calculus, from what I remember), although with a bit of probability added

    what type of grad school?

    Gdiguy on
  • GrizzledGrizzled Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Without more details it's hard to say. What kind of program? How good a grad school? How crappy exactly is your GPA?

    I can tell you that I got into a decent grad school in the social sciences with a 3.27, which I considered crappy, but I had a LOT of practical experience in the field and got good recommendations and GRE scores. Those are also important. I know that most places would like you to have at least a 3.0. If it's lower than that, what might help is a recommendation from a professor you have worked with or that really likes you that says "he's smarter than he looks on paper and has additional positive qualities x, y, z."

    The GRE is a little harder than the SAT but still doesn't go past trig; it's also pretty lenient on the scoring, at least for math. I answered about 80% of the questions before running out of time, got a few of the ones I did answer wrong, and still got a 720 on the math part. Reviewing your stuff is key; me and my buddies got one of those Kaplan books and just chugged through it on our own in the evenings. Oh, and I hadn't taken a math class since high school, so I was basically just re-learning everything.

    Grizzled on
  • DistramDistram __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    Okay, here is some more info.


    The grad school/program that I want to get into is Master of Comping and Information Systems.

    The program reqires a unrecalculated 2.7 GPA and I have a 2.33 recalculated. I have a ton of credit hours and so rasing my GPA to 2.33 before I graduate will be impossible.

    The graduate admissions website under my university says that those with a below a 2.7 GPA have to take, and get a satisfactory score on, the GRE in order to be let into the program.

    I have some people who could write me letters of recommendation. So, I figure if I do well on the GRE they'll let me in. But, I'm not sure.

    Also, I'll basically be like you Grizzled. I haven't taken a Math class in forever so I'll have to relearn things. Know, exactly, what I should relearn?

    Distram on
  • Dance CommanderDance Commander Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Any serious IS program is going to involve at least a fair bit of math (combinatorics and probability jump to mind). What is your major?

    Dance Commander on
  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    2.33 is pretty low, and CIS programs are at a pretty high priority to get into. i'm not trying to discourage you from applying, but you're going to need at least 3 letters highly recommending you for the program, some kind of reason that would make a gpa that low understandable, excellent GRE scores, prior work experience wth the systems, and i'd probably arrange a meeting with someone in the department to explain yourself.

    i dunno, as much as i don't want to say it, a 2.33 and a problem with math pretty much sinks your boat; your gpa isn't always indicative of how smart you are/how hard you work, but if i were a graduate admissions guy, a 2.33 would say to me that this person doesn't work very hard and isn't particularly motivated

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • DistramDistram __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    My low GPA is due to taking too many classes early on in my academic career, working too much, and extenuating family circumstances. I get good grades now but due to my large number of credit hours it will be relatively impossible for me to raise my GPA much before I graduate next spring. In short, working hard now doesn't really erase the fact that I didn't, or couldn't, work as hard as I would have liked early on in my academic career due to the way GPA is calculated.

    Its kind of annoying that it's fairly impossible to greatly recover from poor early undergraduate performance. Messing up at college right after high school prevents me from doing what I want when I've actually gotten my proverbial shit together; what a bunch of b.s.

    Also, the CIS graduate program I'd be going into is partly built around the idea of people going into it from other disciplines. There isn't a lot of advanced math involved in the program. It's not a CS degree. Almost all of the curriculum is made of electives so you can build it around what you're good at and what you know. I've talked to a few people about this already. They've told me that someone without a background in Math could get through the program just fine if they didn't take math intensive CS classes. Also, I'm an English major now but I used to be a CS major and I did well in the classes I was in before I changed my major.

    As it stands, I may not even bother. It sounds like they make it impossible to do any post-grad stuff once you've fucked up your GPA.

    Distram on
  • ReitenReiten Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    If your grades have improved, note that in your application. If your grades related to the field you want to enter are good, that's the most important thing. If you score very well on the GRE, that will help a lot. Your recommendations matter a lot as do any samples of your work that you send them.

    However, it also depends on who this gets sent to. If you're sending it to a graduate college admissions office, they're more likely to just toss things that don't meet the formal requirements. If you're sending it directly to the program or department, they're much more likely to look at everything before deciding.

    Reiten on
  • DistramDistram __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    Thanks, Reiten.

    That makes me feel better about my chances.

    Distram on
  • GrizzledGrizzled Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Pants Man accurately describes what the attitude of people reviewing your application is likely to be and what other elements of your application will need to be strong in order to get in. One thing that did spring to mind after reading your posts was that there is sometimes more emphasis on your GPA over the most recent 60 units, so the whole "screwed up early but doing better now" thing may work.

    To add to what Reiten said, I would suggest finding a professor in the program that are interested in working with and contacting them directly to express your interest and explain your situation. Definitely if the only people that see your application are admissions drones, they will probably shuffle it aside in favor of someone with more solid numbers.

    The other advice I can give is that if you don't get in, try to find work in the same field that you are qualifed for and then apply again the following year, emphasizing your increased experience and your now-demonstrated ability to handle the subject matter in a practical setting. This has worked for a couple of guys that I know.

    GRE Math: Algebra including constructing equations from word problems, basic stat (do you remember the difference between a mean and a median?), probability (there are 73 white beans and 24 red beans in a jar...) and basic trig/geometry (here's a big triangle cut into a bunch of smaller triangles with some random sides and angles labelled, what is the sin of x?). Seriously, just invest in a test prep book (NOT a class) and grind your way through it.

    Grizzled on
  • VisionOfClarityVisionOfClarity Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    This year I worked in the office that made graduate acceptance decisions and I can tell you that unless you do really well on your GRE most graduate schools will not take you seriously no matter what your recommendation letters say. No offense, but a 2.33 is really low and to maintain a GPA that low you had to seriously fuck up your freshmen year to the point of near flunking out or do really poorly your freshmen and sophomore years and graduate schools don't care why that happened either.

    You already know this though, and you also seem pretty clear on the fact that you have to ace your GRE to compete. I'd suggest taking a prep course. Just be aware that acing the GRE won't guarantee you a spot either as you'll still be competing with kids who did well on the GRE and well in their undergraduate programs.

    VisionOfClarity on
  • DrFrylockDrFrylock Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Good advice on this thread.

    1. Your 2.33 GPA is a serious liability and so you're gonna have to work to make this happen. It's not impossible.
    2. Take prep courses and nail the GRE. It is very do-able. I think you can take it more than once, too, so if at first you don't succeed...
    3. In your application materials, emphasize that your academic performance has significantly improved. Mention, but don't belabor, what happened to cause the low performance early on. One sentence is not too short. Don't make excuses.
    4. Get fantastic letters of rec and have THEM emphasize the same.
    5. This is the most important one: make an appointment with the admissions counselor at the place you're applying and meet with him/her personally. Explain what happened and ask what you can do. Make an effort. I have seen mountains move for people that did this.

    Good luck.

    DrFrylock on
  • ScrubletScrublet Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    DrFrylock wrote: »
    1. Your 2.33 GPA is a serious liability and so you're gonna have to work to make this happen. It's not impossible.
    2. Take prep courses and nail the GRE. It is very do-able. I think you can take it more than once, too, so if at first you don't succeed...
    3. In your application materials, emphasize that your academic performance has significantly improved. Mention, but don't belabor, what happened to cause the low performance early on. One sentence is not too short. Don't make excuses.
    4. Get fantastic letters of rec and have THEM emphasize the same.
    5. This is the most important one: make an appointment with the admissions counselor at the place you're applying and meet with him/her personally. Explain what happened and ask what you can do. Make an effort. I have seen mountains move for people that did this.

    This is the best list I see. Combine it with personal contact with a professor and you've done all you can. However, I would evaluate how much time you want to spend on this. Given the severe hit your GPA is, I think you're best off finishing school as good as you can and entering in the work market. Proficiency at your job may take a lot of the edge off of your GPA.

    Scrublet on
    subedii wrote: »
    I hear PC gaming is huge off the coast of Somalia right now.

    PSN: TheScrublet
  • GdiguyGdiguy San Diego, CARegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    DrFrylock wrote: »
    Good advice on this thread.

    1. Your 2.33 GPA is a serious liability and so you're gonna have to work to make this happen. It's not impossible.
    2. Take prep courses and nail the GRE. It is very do-able. I think you can take it more than once, too, so if at first you don't succeed...
    3. In your application materials, emphasize that your academic performance has significantly improved. Mention, but don't belabor, what happened to cause the low performance early on. One sentence is not too short. Don't make excuses.
    4. Get fantastic letters of rec and have THEM emphasize the same.
    5. This is the most important one: make an appointment with the admissions counselor at the place you're applying and meet with him/her personally. Explain what happened and ask what you can do. Make an effort. I have seen mountains move for people that did this.

    Good luck.

    I've heard (anecdotally) that retaking the GRE over and over is not such a great idea, since you (as far as I know) can't send individual math/verbal scores from different tests, so I'd definitely not go in with a mindset of retaking it until you do well

    I'm in a pretty different field (biology), so the other advice might be more towards your field... but with your GPA, you might stand a much better chance if you can do some sort of internship/work in the field you're applying for. I know that for bio programs, having really good research experience can make an enormous difference compared to just GPA

    Gdiguy on
  • DistramDistram __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    I've talked to some people and I think I'm just going to double-major instead of entering a grad program.

    The guy in charge of the grad program that I was wanting to get into did say that I could probably get into the program if I demonstrated, via programming at networking classes, that I could grasp the material and if I scored into the top 50th percentile on the GRE. But, it still sounds like a crap shoot to me and so I am just going to get a B.S.A.S. in IT instead. Along with my B.A. in English, that should make me decently employable - I would hope.

    Distram on
  • jkylefultonjkylefulton Squid...or Kid? NNID - majpellRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    If you're that concerned about the GRE, buy/use one of the study guides beforehand. The top 50th percentile should not be difficult.

    jkylefulton on
    tOkYVT2.jpg
  • DogDog Registered User, Administrator, Vanilla Staff admin
    edited February 2008
    How much less of an emphasis is there on GPA if you've been a part of the working world for a number of years, and are looking to go back to school to further your already existing career?

    Unknown User on
  • The SnertThe Snert Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    It's definately do-able. If you have a defeatist attitude (like what I'm seeing already with
    Messing up at college right after high school prevents me from doing what I want when I've actually gotten my proverbial shit together; what a bunch of b.s.

    It's not a bunch of b.s. That attitude isn't going to prove to an admissions officer that you got your proverbial shit together. Everyone's given really good advise, and I cannot add much to it aside from my own experience. I had a 2.4 undergrad gpa. I really wanted to get my MIS, so i applied to grad school. I got recommendations. I scored high on the GRE. I put forth the effort to get the best grades possible for my last 60 credits, knowing full well that they won't raise my gpa much. Why did I do it? Because I wanted to succeed. I wanted to prove to myself, and anyone who would consider me that I am a different person then what my early grades show.
    I took a year off and got real experience in IT. And it worked. I got into the program I wanted to, and now I'm halfway through my MIS degree and I have a 4.0.

    The Snert on
  • mtsmts Dr. Robot King Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I sit on my programs admissions committee. Honestly you probably are a bit on the fucked side. We usually won't really even consider someone with less than a 3.0 unless they have amazing boards and a good application.

    that being said, if you can retake some classes where you did not so well in, that would look favorably if you did better.

    There is moe leniency when going for masters rather than a PhD. If you really want the doctorate, I think if you can get into a masters program somewhere and do well, it looks better for you.

    i would still apply, but it doesn't look good. If you can ace your GRE, it will also look good, and hopefully your application is great otherwise

    mts on
    camo_sig.png
  • grendel824_grendel824_ Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    robothero wrote: »
    How much less of an emphasis is there on GPA if you've been a part of the working world for a number of years, and are looking to go back to school to further your already existing career?

    Less. How much less depends on the institution and the individuals involved. GPA is a convenient filter, but anywhere worth attending should know that there are many other factors that could be worth considering.

    grendel824_ on
  • LewishamLewisham Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    We're talking about the General GRE right? Not the Comp Sci one?

    Because that exam royally fucked me. I had a 3.8GPA from the year I spent abroad in the US, and the Comp Sci GRE popped me out at the 25th percentile, after I'd studied for months. I was devastated.

    Lewisham on
  • DistramDistram __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    The Snert wrote: »
    It's definately do-able. If you have a defeatist attitude (like what I'm seeing already with
    Messing up at college right after high school prevents me from doing what I want when I've actually gotten my proverbial shit together; what a bunch of b.s.

    It's not a bunch of b.s. That attitude isn't going to prove to an admissions officer that you got your proverbial shit together. Everyone's given really good advise, and I cannot add much to it aside from my own experience. I had a 2.4 undergrad gpa. I really wanted to get my MIS, so i applied to grad school. I got recommendations. I scored high on the GRE. I put forth the effort to get the best grades possible for my last 60 credits, knowing full well that they won't raise my gpa much. Why did I do it? Because I wanted to succeed. I wanted to prove to myself, and anyone who would consider me that I am a different person then what my early grades show.
    I took a year off and got real experience in IT. And it worked. I got into the program I wanted to, and now I'm halfway through my MIS degree and I have a 4.0.

    I don't have a defeatist attitude. Even so, I wasn't thinking of doing the Master's program just so I could prove something to anyone or to myself. I know I could handle the work in such a program. However, sometimes a person is just fucked. I may try anyway but I am considering what is best for me and right now simply double-majoring is better for me than trying to get into a Master's program.

    Distram on
  • falsedeffalsedef Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I have a double major. I did the double for fun.

    If you're expecting it to help you in a job hunt or impress someone, it won't. Most people act confused more than anything.

    falsedef on
  • DistramDistram __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    falsedef wrote: »
    I have a double major. I did the double for fun.

    If you're expecting it to help you in a job hunt or impress someone, it won't. Most people act confused more than anything.

    When I'm done I'll have a B.A. and a B.S.A.S

    No one will care about that?

    Distram on
  • falsedeffalsedef Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Distram wrote: »
    falsedef wrote: »
    I have a double major. I did the double for fun.

    If you're expecting it to help you in a job hunt or impress someone, it won't. Most people act confused more than anything.

    When I'm done I'll have a B.A. and a B.S.A.S

    No one will care about that?

    I have a BA and BS. Most people will ignore the less relevant degree (or the one they think is less interesting), and then totally forget altogether. Again, I haven't really met anyone that's been impressed, but plenty who've been perplexed.

    I'm not saying it wasn't worth it, it just depends on your reasoning behind it. A minor would be just as good, and work experience matters the most.

    falsedef on
  • DaenrisDaenris Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    falsedef wrote: »
    Distram wrote: »
    falsedef wrote: »
    I have a double major. I did the double for fun.

    If you're expecting it to help you in a job hunt or impress someone, it won't. Most people act confused more than anything.

    When I'm done I'll have a B.A. and a B.S.A.S

    No one will care about that?

    I have a BA and BS. Most people will ignore the less relevant degree (or the one they think is less interesting), and then totally forget altogether. Again, I haven't really met anyone that's been impressed, but plenty who've been perplexed.

    I'm not saying it wasn't worth it, it just depends on your reasoning behind it. A minor would be just as good, and work experience matters the most.

    Well, I don't really agree with the minor being "just as good" because you won't get quite the depth you do with a double major. However, I do know from experience that you're pretty much right about people focusing on the relevant degree and not really caring that you have another. If you're not sure what you want to do later but have it narrowed down to two general areas, you could get a double major so that you have a relevant degree for either field. However if you're just doing it to pad your resume it's kind of pointless.

    Daenris on
  • DistramDistram __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    Well, I'm double-majoring because a B.A. in English isn't, or so I have heard, exactly a practical degree as far as getting a job goes - unless I want to be an Engligh teacher; which, I don't. I just like studying literature and doing creative fiction and non-fiction writing. So, I thought I'd pick up a degree in a more practical field such as Information Technology. Plus, in my spare time I design web sites and try to learn diffrerent programming languages.

    I was hoping potential employers would be impressed. I was hoping it would pad my resume. But, that's not why I am double-majoring. However, I am dissapointed to hear that its fairly useless as far as getting a job goes.

    Distram on
  • DaenrisDaenris Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Yeah... I was in pretty much the same boat. Majoring in Creative Writing, then decided to add a second major that would help me get a job (though for some reason I picked Psychology... idiot). It actually has worked out in that I'm working in the psych field now with a good job, but the writing degree is useless for right now. If you're doing it for yourself, then go for it.

    Daenris on
Sign In or Register to comment.