The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Primer - omgwtf

SnorkSnork wordJamaica Plain, MARegistered User regular
edited February 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
So after reading about it here, several times, I decided I really wanted to see this movie Primer.

For those that don't know, it's a relatively recent movie that is ridiculously confusing due to the involvement of time travel in the plot. I can't really explain much about it because I've only seen it once, and as the wiki states, anyone who claims to understand it completely on first viewing is either a savant or a liar. I personally think I have a really good idea of what happens, but I really really want to discuss it with other people.

Aside from being extremely technical and confusing, I found it to also be extremely entertaining, and at times very tense and frightening.

Watch it.

And then help me understand the ending.

(search is broken, so if there's another thread about this please link me because I want to read like ninety million pages on it right now)

Snork on
«13

Posts

  • JohnDoeJohnDoe Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Primer was great.

    Took me 3 viewings and a wiki entry to completely follow it though.

    JohnDoe on
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I must have watched Primer 6 times.

    It's insane. Utterly insane.

    So fucking awesome, though.

    MikeMan on
  • SnorkSnork word Jamaica Plain, MARegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    After reading a Q&A with the director I'm relieved to know that the one big question that I had at the end of the movie was the one thing he purposefully left vague. I can't wait until I get to see it again.
    Aside from having an extremely complex and well-thought-out plot, god damn if that movie didn't have an immensely palpable level of urgency and tenseness in some spots.
    There were just a few scenes where I was watching and I just felt nervous, because I knew I was watching people completely fucking everything up in a very big way.

    Snork on
  • AdrienAdrien Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Yes.

    I'm not surprised this movie isn't more famous, but it's a fucking shame.

    Adrien on
    tmkm.jpg
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Adrien wrote: »
    Yes.

    I'm not surprised this movie isn't more famous, but it's a fucking shame.

    It's a super obscure indy film made on a shoe-string budget. I'm surprised anyone at all has even heard of it.

    MikeMan on
  • AdrienAdrien Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Adrien wrote: »
    Yes.

    I'm not surprised this movie isn't more famous, but it's a fucking shame.

    It's a super obscure indy film made on a shoe-string budget. I'm surprised anyone at all has even heard of it.

    Just makes it that much more impressive, really. The whole thing is super tight.

    Adrien on
    tmkm.jpg
  • GimGim a tall glass of water Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Fun fact: the guy's wife in the movie is his sister in real life.

    TMYK

    Gim on
  • DynagripDynagrip Break me a million hearts HoustonRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    I only watched it once and then went straight to the wikipedia entry. I really liked it though.

    Dynagrip on
  • EuphoricEuphoric Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    If this movie is the movie I think it is (and from the wikipedia entry I think it is) then I only saw like, the last 1/3 of it a while ago. It looked interesting but you know how it is when you walk in on a movie, having to piece together the storyline as it goes, so I didn't realize you confusing the movie is from the start. I really need to find it and watch it.

    Euphoric on
  • NarianNarian Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I was trying to remember the name of this movie awhile back, and I think I'll go rent it right now. Thanks! :^:

    Narian on
    Narian.gif
  • stiliststilist Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Dynagrip wrote: »
    I only watched it once and then went straight to the wikipedia entry. I really liked it though.
    Same. I think I might watch it again.

    stilist on
    I poop things on my site and twitter
  • CherrnCherrn Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I watched it sometime last year, but it honestly didn't make a big impression on me. I gather you have to see it several times to fully appreciate it, though.

    Cherrn on
    All creature will die and all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai.
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Euphoric wrote: »
    If this movie is the movie I think it is (and from the wikipedia entry I think it is) then I only saw like, the last 1/3 of it a while ago. It looked interesting but you know how it is when you walk in on a movie, having to piece together the storyline as it goes, so I didn't realize you confusing the movie is from the start. I really need to find it and watch it.

    It throws some serious curveballs the last 5 minutes

    nexuscrawler on
  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Euphoric wrote: »
    If this movie is the movie I think it is (and from the wikipedia entry I think it is) then I only saw like, the last 1/3 of it a while ago. It looked interesting but you know how it is when you walk in on a movie, having to piece together the storyline as it goes, so I didn't realize you confusing the movie is from the start. I really need to find it and watch it.

    Watching the movie from the start only serves to lessen the degree of "whatthefuck-itude." It never eliminates it.

    MikeMan on
  • Clint EastwoodClint Eastwood My baby's in there someplace She crawled right inRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I was really interested in this movie and rented it but it really bored me to tears. I might give it another shot some time since I keep hearing good things about it, but my initial impression was really bad.

    Clint Eastwood on
  • HamjuHamju Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    When I first watched Primer I was high and at the time I thought I was following along fine and then all of a sudden it ended and I was just like, ".....what?"

    Edit: but ya, amazing movie. I want to watch it again

    Hamju on
    kekekesigshortercuzthinsacunt.jpg
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Primer = only movie about time travel ever that makes a lick of sense.

    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • Evil MultifariousEvil Multifarious Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Feral wrote: »
    Primer = only movie about time travel ever that makes a lick of sense.

    Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure.

    Evil Multifarious on
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    I really want to watch this movie, but it's not like I can really find it anywhere.

    Is there a place on the net where I can find it? It's not on youtube or itunes

    Deviant Hands on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I really want to watch this movie, but it's not like I can really find it anywhere.

    Is there a place on the net where I can find it? It's not on youtube or itunes

    Netflix has it.

    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • AdrienAdrien Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    If there were a link to the full video from the Wikipedia page, would that be something that's okay? I can't find anything about them releasing it for free.

    I would say it's totally worth the $20 DVD, 'cause it is, but some people disagree with that, so you'd probably want to check it out first.

    Adrien on
    tmkm.jpg
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    I'll watch it first before I decide to buy it or not.

    Deviant Hands on
  • durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Shit, thanks for reminding me that I need to see this. Now, of course, I have to leave the thread until I do.

    durandal4532 on
    We're all in this together
  • toxk_02toxk_02 Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Man I had another movie planned for tonight but I just pulled Primer off the shelf instead.

    Thank you thread. :^:

    Amazing movie, plus it seems like it was made so you'd watch it again immediately - it's only 77 minutes long so two back-to-back viewings is 2 and half hours.

    Real spoiler/plot question:
    What's the deal with the older dude (girlfriend's dad) finding the machine? I feel like I'm missing something, otherwise it seems he managed to not only find the machines but operate one, all on his own. Or is it implied he was getting suspicious of Aaron and Abe?

    edit: while I recommend watching the DVD, if you can't the movie is on Google Video. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3909854615539675694

    toxk_02 on
    OTP.jpg
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    It is also on netflix's instant watch thing.

    Doc on
  • ClevingerClevinger Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    I have a couple questions for those who've figured a lot of it out:
    1. Why do they bleed out their ears?
    2. Why does their handwriting become horrible?

    Really, I understood practically nothing in the last third, but those are some questions...

    thanks

    Really good movie, even without understanding it. The tension and creepiness in some parts was immense.

    Clevinger on
  • DingusDingus Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    toxk_02 wrote: »

    Real spoiler/plot question:
    What's the deal with the older dude (girlfriend's dad) finding the machine? I feel like I'm missing something, otherwise it seems he managed to not only find the machines but operate one, all on his own. Or is it implied he was getting suspicious of Aaron and Abe?

    I thought that it was implied that one of them showed him the machine in the future, it has been a while since I have lost this. The idea that one of them in the future shared the knowledge of the machine and they currently had no possible way of knowing the circumstances why caused the two to become suspicious of each other iirc.

    Edit: Tags sure work better when I spell spoiler right...

    Dingus on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Dingus wrote: »
    toxk_02 wrote: »

    Real spoiler/plot question:
    What's the deal with the older dude (girlfriend's dad) finding the machine? I feel like I'm missing something, otherwise it seems he managed to not only find the machines but operate one, all on his own. Or is it implied he was getting suspicious of Aaron and Abe?

    I thought that it was implied that one of them showed him the machine in the future, it has been a while since I have lost this. The idea that one of them in the future shared the knowledge of the machine and they currently had no possible way of knowing the circumstances why caused the two to become suspicious of each other iirc.

    Edit: Tags sure work better when I spell spoiler right...

    /agree with Dingus

    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • DingusDingus Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Clevinger wrote: »
    I have a couple questions for those who've figured a lot of it out:
    1. Why do they bleed out their ears?
    2. Why does their handwriting become horrible?

    Really, I understood practically nothing in the last third, but those are some questions...

    thanks

    Really good movie, even without understanding it. The tension and creepiness in some parts was immense.
    I just viewed those as physiological side-effects from the machine, I didn't think they had any purpose beyond showing how they were willing to ignore the physical repercussions of time travel and not even think about abandoning the use of the machine despite the fact that it was fucking them up.

    Dingus on
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    Just finished watching it.

    The wikipedia entry on this movie doesn't really explain much.
    I don't understand what was up with the whole guy bringing a shotgun to a party thing. Did he kill a shitload of people? Who was that guy

    Deviant Hands on
  • DingusDingus Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Just finished watching it.

    The wikipedia entry on this movie doesn't really explain much.
    I don't understand what was up with the whole guy bringing a shotgun to a party thing. Did he kill a shitload of people? Who was that guy
    He was the ex-boyfriend of Abe's girl (the daughter of the guy they were trying to get finances from). I think that on one timeline he may have killed some people and um not-abe went back and stopped it, causing further tension between the two of them (due to dude taking risks when he has a family, which Abe my be very jealous of him having) and furthering their desire to experiment with causality. I got a little confused around that point too though, seems like they had some idea of more they wanted to do with that, but did not have the time/money.

    Dingus on
  • ClevingerClevinger Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    What was the last scene all about?
    And what were Abe and the other guy arguing about at the airport(?) near the end, and Abe telling him not to come back?

    Clevinger on
  • SnorkSnork word Jamaica Plain, MARegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Clevinger wrote: »
    What was the last scene all about?
    And what were Abe and the other guy arguing about at the airport(?) near the end, and Abe telling him not to come back?

    The last scene was
    Narrator-Aaron building a room-sized box in France. He wants to go even further with it, but Abe got scared a long time ago with how much they were fucking with causality, so he wanted to scrap the whole thing and let things sort themselves out. Aaron knows that this is pretty much impossible, so he just wants to do shit even more.

    As far as Granger goes,
    Shane Carruth, the director and guy who plays Aaron has said that that is the one loose end he wanted to leave open. Given that at the end of the movie Aaron is building a room-sized box and is not very discreet about it, I think it's pretty safe to assume that at any point in the future, Granger finds and uses one of the original boxes.

    Snork on
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008

    Ok so if you put someone in the machine and watch them the whole time, what would you see once they awake for time travel?

    Deviant Hands on
  • SnorkSnork word Jamaica Plain, MARegistered User regular
    edited February 2008

    Ok so if you put someone in the machine and watch them the whole time, what would you see once they awake for time travel?
    If I understand correctly, nothing. The timeline they live on ceases to exist, and the double's time line takes over. They exit the box at the moment it was turned on.

    Snork on
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    So if they exit at the moment it turns on, an observer wouldn't actually know if it worked unless they ran tests to see that the subjects are older and that they have information about the future..

    Basically the machine would give you knowledge of the future and makes you older.

    Deviant Hands on
  • AdrienAdrien Registered User regular
    edited February 2008
    So if they exit at the moment it turns on, an observer wouldn't actually know if it worked unless they ran tests to see that the subjects are older and that they have information about the future..

    Basically the machine would give you knowledge of the future and makes you older.

    Eh? I think you're still confused, but I'm not sure.
    If I want to travel six hours into the past, I turn the box on now. At the moment I turn on the box, my double Adrien(1) gets out of the box. For six hours my double and I exist side by side. After six hours I get into the box and stop existing in this timeline. I stay in the box for six hours, and then emerge at the time I turned it on as Adrien(1). I exist alongside Adrien(0) for six hours, and then he gets into the box and stops existing in this timeline. I continue living as the only Adrien.

    Adrien on
    tmkm.jpg
  • SnorkSnork word Jamaica Plain, MARegistered User regular
    edited February 2008
    Adrien wrote: »
    So if they exit at the moment it turns on, an observer wouldn't actually know if it worked unless they ran tests to see that the subjects are older and that they have information about the future..

    Basically the machine would give you knowledge of the future and makes you older.

    Eh? I think you're still confused, but I'm not sure.
    If I want to travel six hours into the past, I turn the box on now. At the moment I turn on the box, my double Adrien(1) gets out of the box. For six hours my double and I exist side by side. After six hours I get into the box and stop existing in this timeline. I stay in the box for six hours, and then emerge at the time I turned it on as Adrien(1). I exist alongside Adrien(0) for six hours, and then he gets into the box and stops existing in this timeline. I continue living as the only Adrien.
    This is correct. The six hours Adrien(1) is in the box (before emerging as Adrien(1)) is the same six hours that Adrien(0) would be waiting in the hotel room or something.

    Snork on
  • Deviant HandsDeviant Hands __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2008
    Snork wrote: »
    Adrien wrote: »
    So if they exit at the moment it turns on, an observer wouldn't actually know if it worked unless they ran tests to see that the subjects are older and that they have information about the future..

    Basically the machine would give you knowledge of the future and makes you older.

    Eh? I think you're still confused, but I'm not sure.
    If I want to travel six hours into the past, I turn the box on now. At the moment I turn on the box, my double Adrien(1) gets out of the box. For six hours my double and I exist side by side. After six hours I get into the box and stop existing in this timeline. I stay in the box for six hours, and then emerge at the time I turned it on as Adrien(1). I exist alongside Adrien(0) for six hours, and then he gets into the box and stops existing in this timeline. I continue living as the only Adrien.
    This is correct. The six hours Adrien(1) is in the box (before emerging as Adrien(1)) is the same six hours that Adrien(0) would be waiting in the hotel room or something.
    And how about if you never go back into the box after the six hours pass?

    And would an external observor just see a dude randomly appear in the box out of nowhere?

    Deviant Hands on
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited February 2008
    Clevinger wrote: »
    What was the last scene all about?
    And what were Abe and the other guy arguing about at the airport(?) near the end, and Abe telling him not to come back?
    My understanding of the airport scene (we will call the two guys in the airport group A) is that they have both gone back to when they first started the "failsafe" system, and therefore have have doubles (group B) currently living. Group A is trying to sabotage the devices so that group B never messes with the stuff in the first place. If that happens, group B will never cease to exist on their timeline as normally happens when you go back, so both groups A and B will live out their lives.

    Doc on
Sign In or Register to comment.