The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Another Way Schools Are Failing Our Kids

123578

Posts

  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Well, girl-brawls and beatings are on the rise (which happens to be a good benchmark, in my opinion, of how well we're eliminating ingrained female passivity).

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • OboroOboro __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    You're looking at the problem far too laterally. I don't think it's something that can be dealt with, in any universe or context, as effectively as the overt bullying, but there's probably some headway that can be made at the secondary-school level or so by just raising awareness and promoting better mental health and self-esteem across the board. I mean, maybe expanding the material covered in freshman/sophomore health courses (already required in most districts, in some sense, AFAIK)?

    Oboro on
    words
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Spoony wrote: »
    My gut reaction to girl bullying is that it's pretty insignificant after watching dudes get their teeth punched in. Boys that were bullied at my schools would have considered the 'relational aggression' that girls use to be a godsend.

    Having been on the receiving end of both kinds I'll take the violence thanks.
    Spoony wrote: »
    Bullying-back isn't self-defense.

    Unfortunately, it is usually one of the only effective means to get bullies to stop.

    Just like the best way to get rapists to stop is to rape them. That's why sexual assault has such a low rate of recidivism among felons who have finished their prison terms or been released on parole after getting their ass plugged by manbears for several years.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Spoony wrote: »
    My gut reaction to girl bullying is that it's pretty insignificant after watching dudes get their teeth punched in. Boys that were bullied at my schools would have considered the 'relational aggression' that girls use to be a godsend.

    Having been on the receiving end of both kinds I'll take the violence thanks.
    Spoony wrote: »
    Bullying-back isn't self-defense.

    Unfortunately, it is usually one of the only effective means to get bullies to stop.

    Just like the best way to get rapists to stop is to rape them. That's why sexual assault has such a low rate of recidivism among felons who have finished their prison terms or been released on parole after getting their ass plugged by manbears for several years.

    Don't forget Ireland v.Britain, and Israel v. Palestine.

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Scalfin wrote: »
    Spoony wrote: »
    My gut reaction to girl bullying is that it's pretty insignificant after watching dudes get their teeth punched in. Boys that were bullied at my schools would have considered the 'relational aggression' that girls use to be a godsend.

    Having been on the receiving end of both kinds I'll take the violence thanks.
    Spoony wrote: »
    Bullying-back isn't self-defense.

    Unfortunately, it is usually one of the only effective means to get bullies to stop.

    Just like the best way to get rapists to stop is to rape them. That's why sexual assault has such a low rate of recidivism among felons who have finished their prison terms or been released on parole after getting their ass plugged by manbears for several years.

    Don't forget Ireland v.Britain, and Israel v. Palestine.

    I like my example because a lot of the motivations behind it are the same as those behind bullying.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • DetharinDetharin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    It amuses me, if this kid had snapped and proceded to kill one or more of the people who have been bullying him people would be standing around watching the parents of the victims weep and scream "why god why" and the media would be bombarded with stories about "How this was a complete shock" , "Noone saw it coming", and "What we can do to prevent this by attacking unrelated things and labeling some sub culture as the culprit"

    If people refuse to leave you alone and cannot be taught to respect you. You are left with no choice but to make them fear you.

    Detharin on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    They can be taught to respect you. By their peers. It should come as no shock that teenagers attitudes are not easily dictated by authority figures, but if none of the cool guys are willing to hang out with bullies and none of the hot girls are willing to date them they are presented with a much scarier threat than a 3-day suspension.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • DetharinDetharin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    They can be taught to respect you. By their peers. It should come as no shock that teenagers attitudes are not easily dictated by authority figures, but if none of the cool guys are willing to hang out with bullies and none of the hot girls are willing to date them they are presented with a much scarier threat than a 3-day suspension.

    ...Yeah because as opposed to cheering on the bully and making fun of the poor victim like most high school kids they should all band together to defend the poor kid like some kinda sappy after school special. Most teenagers arent even sure who they are, let alone brave enough to stand up for someone else. Especially when it opens them up to ridicule as the crowd now turns on them.

    The "cool" guys are usually the biggest dicks who are looked up to because they do pick on others, and the women want to date them because they are the "alpha" males.

    Since we cant change schoolyard dynamics then we have to stop the problem with fear. Fear that their parents will beat their asses if they dont stop picking on billy the wonder victim, or fear billy the wonder victim will fight back. Bullies attack the weakest target, since this has gone on for so long its obvious they arent being punished so they continue to do it. Because there are no consequences.

    My advice, grab a 2x4 in wood shop and beat the living shit out of one of them. Maybe have to do that 2 or 3 times but it will solve the problem.

    Detharin on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Yeah, parents regularly wailing on their kids isn't at all a frequently-occurring characteristic of bullies' families.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    If only someone could discover a kid-friendly way to teach children from a young age that with power comes responsibility. Like I dunno a super-hero or some shit.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • DetharinDetharin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    If only someone could discover a kid-friendly way to teach children from a young age that with power comes responsibility. Like I dunno a super-hero or some shit.

    Perhaps they might even have some kinda catchy name like "Dad" or "Mom".

    Detharin on
  • Robos A Go GoRobos A Go Go Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    It would be nice if we could force bullies to attend anger management or counseling. Seems to me like a more efficient way of solving the problem than facing every victim to take karate until no victims are left.

    Robos A Go Go on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Detharin wrote: »
    If only someone could discover a kid-friendly way to teach children from a young age that with power comes responsibility. Like I dunno a super-hero or some shit.

    Perhaps they might even have some kinda catchy name like "Dad" or "Mom".

    Oh those wouldn't work, you just finished telling me that we have no control over schoolyard social-conventions.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • Steel-AngelSteel-Angel Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I always wondered why kids can't file for restraining orders.

    Steel-Angel on
    signaturep.jpg
  • DetharinDetharin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    WE dont. However the parents who are currently doing jack shit about it do. WE cant make all the kids stop being assholes. However if their parents stopped ignoring the problem and did something about their kid then maybe the problem would either go away, OR they would move onto another target whos parents arent getting ready to sue them.

    This problem is either going to end with violence, or parenting. So far parenting has failed and its running out of time.

    Detharin on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Are you kidding? What high school kid doesn't want to be compared to college kids? Older, more mature, don't live in their parents' basement, drink and party whenever, in charge of their own shit, etc.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • DetharinDetharin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Are you kidding? What high school kid doesn't want to be compared to college kids? Older, more mature, don't live in their parents' basement, drink and party whenever, in charge of their own shit, etc.

    Bullies dont stop being bullies at 18, or 21, or really ever until they learn to treat people with respect, OR that their is someone stronger who kill kick their ass for not treating people with respect. Its sad, but its human nature. Hold overs from our hunter gatherer, only the strong survive, cave man society.

    Detharin on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    You sure are eager to make excuses to commit assault with a deadly weapon. In a school.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • Chake99Chake99 Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Detharin wrote: »
    They can be taught to respect you. By their peers. It should come as no shock that teenagers attitudes are not easily dictated by authority figures, but if none of the cool guys are willing to hang out with bullies and none of the hot girls are willing to date them they are presented with a much scarier threat than a 3-day suspension.

    ...Yeah because as opposed to cheering on the bully and making fun of the poor victim like most high school kids they should all band together to defend the poor kid like some kinda sappy after school special. Most teenagers arent even sure who they are, let alone brave enough to stand up for someone else. Especially when it opens them up to ridicule as the crowd now turns on them.

    Actually, that much is not really necessary. All that's needed is for the bullies intended audience to watch disinterestedly and not smilingly, and shake their heads dismissively, and communicate via body language that they're bored/disgusted.

    All that's needed is for teens to have some empathy and respect for people they don't know, but that's not quite common.

    Little known fact: most of the Rwandan genocide was carried out by kids 13-17 years of age with machetes.
    The "cool" guys are usually the biggest dicks who are looked up to because they do pick on others, and the women want to date them because they are the "alpha" males.

    Since we cant change schoolyard dynamics then we have to stop the problem with fear. Fear that their parents will beat their asses if they dont stop picking on billy the wonder victim, or fear billy the wonder victim will fight back. Bullies attack the weakest target, since this has gone on for so long its obvious they arent being punished so they continue to do it. Because there are no consequences.

    My advice, grab a 2x4 in wood shop and beat the living shit out of one of them. Maybe have to do that 2 or 3 times but it will solve the problem.

    I disagree with you a bit. Consequences have to be forthcoming, but I think you're being a bit harsh on both kids and the solution needed.

    I'm blessed in going to a private school that was fairly selective (intelligence wise) in choosing people. And to be honest, bullying is not that huge. Sure there's a bunch of passive aggressive bullshit (there always is) but meanness is for the most part socially frowned upon.

    Authority figures just need to stop sadistic behaviour and I guess at the root, sadism in kids. When they're younger, focus on empathy. When they're older, do not tolerate blatant, teasing/attacks.

    Yes, there's usually something better bullying victims could do, but that's completely besides the point, they're not guilty of anything. 'Tis the ones creating the problems that should be dealt with. Not the ones who were in a position to "possibly-if-they-played-everything-perfectly-prevent-them."

    Chake99 on
    Hic Rhodus, Hic Salta.
  • ED!ED! Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I don't want to read the entire thread, but where I was raised the reason teachers really weren't effective - because they were afraid of the students. My freshman year in highschool we had a blood/crips knife fight, a teacher have her coffee poisoned with bleach, a loaded gun mysteriously end up on freshman campus and a skinny white kid student bloodied by an easily 200 pound Samoan. So yea, while I wouldn't be surprised if some of this "Well lets discipline him internally to protect our funding" going on, I highly doubt its the ROOT of why peer abuse continues in schools despite Columbine and the like.

    ED! on
    "Get the hell out of me" - [ex]girlfriend
  • KeptinKeptin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Hopping on this train a little late, but, is it just me or is this article really poorly written? It has a whole heaping lack of information, mostly because it is about kids at an age that the school can't release the information for.

    One, I don't see what people are expecting the school to do in this case. He is being bullied repeatedly, yes. However, it seems he is being bullied by different kids each time. Is the school supposed to hire him a body guard? They can punish students who do things, but preemptive tactics just don't work. I'm sure everyone in here listened to every spiel the teachers went on. Don't do drugs, don't have sex, don't bully... etc... etc...

    If bullying is a problem in this town, then the blame goes to the parents and the culture there. Blaming the school and "the system" is a poor proposition.

    I say this from the point of view of someone who has gone through bullying as well. I moved between cities from junior high to high school, from a city of about 400,000 to a town of 60,000. In my old school, I did well and played quite well with others. When I moved to the new town, I was still very outgoing - a bit too much. I didn't get along great with everybody, but I had friends. However, I slowly fell into a bit of bullying from a couple of assholes who just didn't quit. Part of the reason behind it was my lack of respect for seniority. There were a number of factors in there. Fighting became more common and I was a pretty athletic kid - so I gave a good as I got, but that was definitely the wrong thing to do. It being a small town though, a couple people upset me trickled down to others until it was just unbearable to go to school due to constant harassment. I ended up transferring schools and turning out ok.

    The thing is - there was nothing the school could do in the situation. Either I changed or people changed. A school forcing kids to change doesn't change a bit about how they act outside of school - where the majority of interaction happens. They can't make people be your friends and sometimes being bullied is better than outright being ignored (thats my opinion anyways. I'd imagine it'd differ depending on the level of bullying).

    Now, keeping that in mind, I still feel this was a bullshit article. It is clearly biased towards the kid being 'bullied' and at the end of the day - this is a kid that tears pages out of textbooks rather than return them to teachers. This is bush league journalism and degrades into a he-said-she-said argument with no facts, simply on side.

    Keptin on
  • OboroOboro __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    I would have no problem with reprimanding, taking whatever punitive action is appropriate, and referring the abusing party to counseling as well as talking personally with their parents.

    This stance does not change if the abusing party is actually four, or fourteen, or forty children. I don't understand why "Oh, but there's more than one!" is a rationalization for why action can't be taken against the offenders instead of the victim.

    Oboro on
    words
  • DetharinDetharin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    You sure are eager to make excuses to commit assault with a deadly weapon. In a school.

    Excuses hell, this kid has been picked on for years. I would be amazed if he hasnt already developed severe mental and emotional problems that will follow him the rest of his life. So far the school has failed to do anything, the parents of the other children have failed to do anything, im merely stating that at some point they are going to push him to far.

    Every human being has a breaking point, if they push him to his ill have a hard time finding sympathy for whatever he does to them.

    Detharin on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Detharin wrote: »
    You sure are eager to make excuses to commit assault with a deadly weapon. In a school.

    Excuses hell, this kid has been picked on for years. I would be amazed if he hasnt already developed severe mental and emotional problems that will follow him the rest of his life. So far the school has failed to do anything, the parents of the other children have failed to do anything, im merely stating that at some point they are going to push him to far.

    Every human being has a breaking point, if they push him to his ill have a hard time finding sympathy for whatever he does to them.

    No, you're actually actively arguing in support of him going too far. That's not the same thing as pointing out an inevitability (which isn't really inevitable either). Your advice is for him to grab a 2x4 and start smacking people around. I bet that's totally not going to escalate anything or land him in jail facing felony assault-charges either.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • JebusUDJebusUD Adventure! Candy IslandRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Oboro wrote: »
    Regardless of anecdotal evidence of kids mannin' up!, I don't see why that is at all a solution we should be satisfied with. It's horrific when you preach a method of recourse that boils down to vigilante justice. Shouldn't there have been papers written on this or something? Can anyone produce some evidence that the most effective deterrent is fighting back? I don't distrust those praising the idea, I'm just curious if it's documented.

    It really does just sort of speak to the sad state of affairs, though, and I second the motion that something needs to be done in a codified and ideally nationwide manner, though really it would have to be a national state-wide implementation or however you want to word it. I don't know. Blargh. e_e

    Also on the female peer abuse thing, yeah again I think that there's no method for the girls to retaliate directly but that isn't really what I was asking you to answer. It's sort of appalling in its own right that your mind went as far as, "Yeah, she can't [fist]fight those problems, so she's without recourse."

    Again. Education and putting a backbone in school administrations. The girl shouldn't have to ignore it, and until we somehow can cobble together the funding to address the issues with the abusers, maybe instead it's more practical to aid the abused? It shouldn't come down to schools practically forcing the children to leave, and not giving them assistance in the process (fiscal or otherwise).

    Yeah, it is pretty sad and hardly a satisfactory solution. I was just saying that fighting back with your tormentors is probably better than just taking it while the administration does nothing.

    It surely isnt the optimal condition though. And it is still not the victims fault.

    JebusUD on
    and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
    but they're listening to every word I say
  • MagicPrimeMagicPrime FiresideWizard Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    JebusUD wrote: »
    Oboro wrote: »
    Regardless of anecdotal evidence of kids mannin' up!, I don't see why that is at all a solution we should be satisfied with. It's horrific when you preach a method of recourse that boils down to vigilante justice. Shouldn't there have been papers written on this or something? Can anyone produce some evidence that the most effective deterrent is fighting back? I don't distrust those praising the idea, I'm just curious if it's documented.

    It really does just sort of speak to the sad state of affairs, though, and I second the motion that something needs to be done in a codified and ideally nationwide manner, though really it would have to be a national state-wide implementation or however you want to word it. I don't know. Blargh. e_e

    Also on the female peer abuse thing, yeah again I think that there's no method for the girls to retaliate directly but that isn't really what I was asking you to answer. It's sort of appalling in its own right that your mind went as far as, "Yeah, she can't [fist]fight those problems, so she's without recourse."

    Again. Education and putting a backbone in school administrations. The girl shouldn't have to ignore it, and until we somehow can cobble together the funding to address the issues with the abusers, maybe instead it's more practical to aid the abused? It shouldn't come down to schools practically forcing the children to leave, and not giving them assistance in the process (fiscal or otherwise).

    Yeah, it is pretty sad and hardly a satisfactory solution. I was just saying that fighting back with your tormentors is probably better than just taking it while the administration does nothing.

    It surely isnt the optimal condition though. And it is still not the victims fault.

    Alternative Options: Call the Newspaper, Talk to the Local News Station, ask to speak at a PTA meeting, set up a meeting with the Superintendent of your County/School District. Get help from your parents, if they don't want anything to do with it get help from a counselor, a pastor, a friend's parents, grandparents, etc. etc. etc.

    A lot of times you can get the story beyond the walls of the school and into the public eye where the administration doesn't want it. Sometimes It can make them act.

    MagicPrime on
    BNet • magicprime#1430 | PSN/Steam • MagicPrime | Origin • FireSideWizard
    Critical Failures - Havenhold CampaignAugust St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
  • JebusUDJebusUD Adventure! Candy IslandRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    MagicPrime wrote: »
    JebusUD wrote: »
    Oboro wrote: »
    Regardless of anecdotal evidence of kids mannin' up!, I don't see why that is at all a solution we should be satisfied with. It's horrific when you preach a method of recourse that boils down to vigilante justice. Shouldn't there have been papers written on this or something? Can anyone produce some evidence that the most effective deterrent is fighting back? I don't distrust those praising the idea, I'm just curious if it's documented.

    It really does just sort of speak to the sad state of affairs, though, and I second the motion that something needs to be done in a codified and ideally nationwide manner, though really it would have to be a national state-wide implementation or however you want to word it. I don't know. Blargh. e_e

    Also on the female peer abuse thing, yeah again I think that there's no method for the girls to retaliate directly but that isn't really what I was asking you to answer. It's sort of appalling in its own right that your mind went as far as, "Yeah, she can't [fist]fight those problems, so she's without recourse."

    Again. Education and putting a backbone in school administrations. The girl shouldn't have to ignore it, and until we somehow can cobble together the funding to address the issues with the abusers, maybe instead it's more practical to aid the abused? It shouldn't come down to schools practically forcing the children to leave, and not giving them assistance in the process (fiscal or otherwise).

    Yeah, it is pretty sad and hardly a satisfactory solution. I was just saying that fighting back with your tormentors is probably better than just taking it while the administration does nothing.

    It surely isnt the optimal condition though. And it is still not the victims fault.

    Alternative Options: Call the Newspaper, Talk to the Local News Station, ask to speak at a PTA meeting, set up a meeting with the Superintendent of your County/School District. Get help from your parents, if they don't want anything to do with it get help from a counselor, a pastor, a friend's parents, grandparents, etc. etc. etc.

    A lot of times you can get the story beyond the walls of the school and into the public eye where the administration doesn't want it. Sometimes It can make them act.

    yeah, maybe if your parents support you. Counselors, eh, thats more iffy. If they didnt do somthing about it already then they are probably part of the problem. And if you are in middle school you probably dont/ cant call the newspaper or talk at the PTA meeting without your parents support.

    JebusUD on
    and I wonder about my neighbors even though I don't have them
    but they're listening to every word I say
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Nova_C wrote: »
    I get what your saying Wawkin, but society is full of examples of people who literally cannot fight back - battered women are an extreme, but appropriate example. Women who are regularly hospitalized by their husbands or boyfriends and yet never lay charges and always return to them. Your philosophy would have us abandon those women to torture and death.

    I was seven years old when someone attacked me with a bag full of books. I never even saw the assailant. I was walking home after school, still on the soccer field and then blam. Walked home swallowing blood.

    There's also the times of being set upon by six guys.

    How do you stop yourself from being a victim when your attackers are either anonymous like in the first case, or vastly outnumber you like in the second. I had no allies to help - my first friend was another kid from church who didn't even go to my school. I had, literally, no friends at school until I was 14 years old.

    And then I was abandoned by the authority when the one time I asked for help I was punished for it. Somebody has to help these kids because even if they try to fight back the odds are stacked against them to a ridiculous degree.

    After reading over othr answers and rereading my own, I believe I've discovered the fundamental difference in viewpoints.

    I am very much of the opinion that a person should be self-reliant, regardless of circumstance. Perhaps it is a by-product of how I was raised.

    Not being self-reliant, forces you necessarily to be dependent. Obviously, as a kid, you are reliant on parents/family and figures representing authority in our society for your protection. Our social system is set-up in that manner. It forces dependence in certain matters; in this case: protection.

    I see a lot of 'what should be done' and 'how to prevent this in the future' and 'this should not be aloud to happen'. None of these considerations are relevant. The situation has and is happening.
    Read the article again.
    The kid has been getting bullied for years now. He has told the people that he depends on to protect him. They have prevented nothing. It is four years later and he is still getting bullied.

    You can complain and point the finger at the school and the parents. They are rightfully blaimed for not preventing this situation. You can point the finger at the bully/bullies, they are in the wrong for this situation. There are plenty of people involved and plenty of blame to place on all of them, for this situation.
    But blaming people doesn't solve anything.

    Shoulda, woulda, coulda, DIDNT. That sums up every solution or possible solution that involves Billy depending on someone else for his protection thus far. The fact that he is in the situation, I can agree, is not his fault. It is unfair and perhaps incredibly unlucky. But he is in the situation. And his protectors have failed in their supposed duty. I just don't see another option for the kid other than 'manning up' and for (probably) for the first time in his life, rely on only himself to solve the problem. The fact that this problem has persisted for four years tells me he is unwilling to attempt self-reliance and that is why I condem him.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    Alternative Options: Call the Newspaper, Talk to the Local News Station, ask to speak at a PTA meeting, set up a meeting with the Superintendent of your County/School District. Get help from your parents, if they don't want anything to do with it get help from a counselor, a pastor, a friend's parents, grandparents, etc. etc. etc.

    Those are definitely good options to consider. That comes across as forcing the issue with the people who are suppose to protect you. If you cannot protect yourself, being the squeaky wheel is a good method to follow.

    That's also why I wish there were some sort of follow-up on the situation. See if publicity motivated action on the part of the school and perhaps more agressive action on the part of the parents.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • MagicPrimeMagicPrime FiresideWizard Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    Alternative Options: Call the Newspaper, Talk to the Local News Station, ask to speak at a PTA meeting, set up a meeting with the Superintendent of your County/School District. Get help from your parents, if they don't want anything to do with it get help from a counselor, a pastor, a friend's parents, grandparents, etc. etc. etc.
    Those are definitely good options to consider. That comes across as forcing the issue with the people who are suppose to protect you. If you cannot protect yourself, being the squeaky wheel is a good method to follow.

    That's also why I wish there were some sort of follow-up on the situation. See if publicity motivated action on the part of the school and perhaps more agressive action on the part of the parents.

    And in a way this would go along with the thought of standing up for yourself. You might not be able to compete physically with said bully, but taking the proactive approach and not stopping till someone helps you/does something about it would show a lot of maturity, and sadly I don't know many highschool/middleschool students who would press the issue if the got the initial shaft. :(

    MagicPrime on
    BNet • magicprime#1430 | PSN/Steam • MagicPrime | Origin • FireSideWizard
    Critical Failures - Havenhold CampaignAugust St. Cloud (Human Ranger)
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    Nova_C wrote: »
    I get what your saying Wawkin, but society is full of examples of people who literally cannot fight back - battered women are an extreme, but appropriate example. Women who are regularly hospitalized by their husbands or boyfriends and yet never lay charges and always return to them. Your philosophy would have us abandon those women to torture and death.

    I was seven years old when someone attacked me with a bag full of books. I never even saw the assailant. I was walking home after school, still on the soccer field and then blam. Walked home swallowing blood.

    There's also the times of being set upon by six guys.

    How do you stop yourself from being a victim when your attackers are either anonymous like in the first case, or vastly outnumber you like in the second. I had no allies to help - my first friend was another kid from church who didn't even go to my school. I had, literally, no friends at school until I was 14 years old.

    And then I was abandoned by the authority when the one time I asked for help I was punished for it. Somebody has to help these kids because even if they try to fight back the odds are stacked against them to a ridiculous degree.

    After reading over othr answers and rereading my own, I believe I've discovered the fundamental difference in viewpoints.

    I am very much of the opinion that a person should be self-reliant, regardless of circumstance. Perhaps it is a by-product of how I was raised.

    Not being self-reliant, forces you necessarily to be dependent. Obviously, as a kid, you are reliant on parents/family and figures representing authority in our society for your protection. Our social system is set-up in that manner. It forces dependence in certain matters; in this case: protection.

    I see a lot of 'what should be done' and 'how to prevent this in the future' and 'this should not be aloud to happen'. None of these considerations are relevant. The situation has and is happening.
    Read the article again.
    The kid has been getting bullied for years now. He has told the people that he depends on to protect him. They have prevented nothing. It is four years later and he is still getting bullied.

    You can complain and point the finger at the school and the parents. They are rightfully blaimed for not preventing this situation. You can point the finger at the bully/bullies, they are in the wrong for this situation. There are plenty of people involved and plenty of blame to place on all of them, for this situation.
    But blaming people doesn't solve anything.

    Shoulda, woulda, coulda, DIDNT. That sums up every solution or possible solution that involves Billy depending on someone else for his protection thus far. The fact that he is in the situation, I can agree, is not his fault. It is unfair and perhaps incredibly unlucky. But he is in the situation. And his protectors have failed in their supposed duty. I just don't see another option for the kid other than 'manning up' and for (probably) for the first time in his life, rely on only himself to solve the problem. The fact that this problem has persisted for four years tells me he is unwilling to attempt self-reliance and that is why I condem him.

    I think you need to read the article again. The group of kids harassing him vastly outnumbers him, and you think he should start a fight in that context. In addition to it being insane to expect everyone who gets picked on to be Rambo, it is also insane to expect everyone who gets picked on to be Custer.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • Wonder_HippieWonder_Hippie __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    It's been bandied about a lot in this thread, and I think the best thing we could do about the problem is to refer to abusive kids to psychologists and counselors. With the stigma on mental health these days, that'd help solve the problem. And if kids start seeing this as a problem with mental health, all the better.

    Wonder_Hippie on
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    Nova_C wrote: »
    I get what your saying Wawkin, but society is full of examples of people who literally cannot fight back - battered women are an extreme, but appropriate example. Women who are regularly hospitalized by their husbands or boyfriends and yet never lay charges and always return to them. Your philosophy would have us abandon those women to torture and death.

    I was seven years old when someone attacked me with a bag full of books. I never even saw the assailant. I was walking home after school, still on the soccer field and then blam. Walked home swallowing blood.

    There's also the times of being set upon by six guys.

    How do you stop yourself from being a victim when your attackers are either anonymous like in the first case, or vastly outnumber you like in the second. I had no allies to help - my first friend was another kid from church who didn't even go to my school. I had, literally, no friends at school until I was 14 years old.

    And then I was abandoned by the authority when the one time I asked for help I was punished for it. Somebody has to help these kids because even if they try to fight back the odds are stacked against them to a ridiculous degree.

    After reading over othr answers and rereading my own, I believe I've discovered the fundamental difference in viewpoints.

    I am very much of the opinion that a person should be self-reliant, regardless of circumstance. Perhaps it is a by-product of how I was raised.

    Not being self-reliant, forces you necessarily to be dependent. Obviously, as a kid, you are reliant on parents/family and figures representing authority in our society for your protection. Our social system is set-up in that manner. It forces dependence in certain matters; in this case: protection.

    I see a lot of 'what should be done' and 'how to prevent this in the future' and 'this should not be aloud to happen'. None of these considerations are relevant. The situation has and is happening.
    Read the article again.
    The kid has been getting bullied for years now. He has told the people that he depends on to protect him. They have prevented nothing. It is four years later and he is still getting bullied.

    You can complain and point the finger at the school and the parents. They are rightfully blaimed for not preventing this situation. You can point the finger at the bully/bullies, they are in the wrong for this situation. There are plenty of people involved and plenty of blame to place on all of them, for this situation.
    But blaming people doesn't solve anything.

    Shoulda, woulda, coulda, DIDNT. That sums up every solution or possible solution that involves Billy depending on someone else for his protection thus far. The fact that he is in the situation, I can agree, is not his fault. It is unfair and perhaps incredibly unlucky. But he is in the situation. And his protectors have failed in their supposed duty. I just don't see another option for the kid other than 'manning up' and for (probably) for the first time in his life, rely on only himself to solve the problem. The fact that this problem has persisted for four years tells me he is unwilling to attempt self-reliance and that is why I condem him.

    I think you need to read the article again. The group of kids harassing him vastly outnumbers him, and you think he should start a fight in that context. In addition to it being insane to expect everyone who gets picked on to be Rambo, it is also insane to expect everyone who gets picked on to be Custer.
    Especially since Custer was a demented fool. Seriously, we're talking about what should be done to fix this sort of situation. You're talking about how one kid can get the shit beat out of him even more.

    Fencingsax on
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    Shoulda, woulda, coulda, DIDNT. That sums up every solution or possible solution that involves Billy depending on someone else for his protection thus far. The fact that he is in the situation, I can agree, is not his fault. It is unfair and perhaps incredibly unlucky. But he is in the situation. And his protectors have failed in their supposed duty. I just don't see another option for the kid other than 'manning up' and for (probably) for the first time in his life, rely on only himself to solve the problem. The fact that this problem has persisted for four years tells me he is unwilling to attempt self-reliance and that is why I condem him.

    I get the feeling that you really REALLY don't understand what happens when people are victimized. Hey, it's great you think everything is so simple and that throwing a few punches solves problems. My belief is that if he starts fighting back, he'll have to fight all the time.

    Can you even grasp the idea that there is enough kids who want to hurt him that they organize themselves through facebook? That they record beating him up for bragging about later on? This is not some schoolyard tussle. This is the systematic torture and abuse of a lone individual by a large group.

    I think you can fuck right off with your "Billy is dumb if he doesn't just teach EVERY OTHER FUCKING KID IN THE SCHOOL a lesson." How many fights would he be in before he gets expelled or outright charged. It's a no win situation no matter how much you want to say it's not.

    Nova_C on
  • FiarynFiaryn Omnicidal Madman Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    wawkin wrote: »
    Nova_C wrote: »
    I get what your saying Wawkin, but society is full of examples of people who literally cannot fight back - battered women are an extreme, but appropriate example. Women who are regularly hospitalized by their husbands or boyfriends and yet never lay charges and always return to them. Your philosophy would have us abandon those women to torture and death.

    I was seven years old when someone attacked me with a bag full of books. I never even saw the assailant. I was walking home after school, still on the soccer field and then blam. Walked home swallowing blood.

    There's also the times of being set upon by six guys.

    How do you stop yourself from being a victim when your attackers are either anonymous like in the first case, or vastly outnumber you like in the second. I had no allies to help - my first friend was another kid from church who didn't even go to my school. I had, literally, no friends at school until I was 14 years old.

    And then I was abandoned by the authority when the one time I asked for help I was punished for it. Somebody has to help these kids because even if they try to fight back the odds are stacked against them to a ridiculous degree.

    After reading over othr answers and rereading my own, I believe I've discovered the fundamental difference in viewpoints.

    I am very much of the opinion that a person should be self-reliant, regardless of circumstance. Perhaps it is a by-product of how I was raised.

    Not being self-reliant, forces you necessarily to be dependent. Obviously, as a kid, you are reliant on parents/family and figures representing authority in our society for your protection. Our social system is set-up in that manner. It forces dependence in certain matters; in this case: protection.

    I see a lot of 'what should be done' and 'how to prevent this in the future' and 'this should not be aloud to happen'. None of these considerations are relevant. The situation has and is happening.
    Read the article again.
    The kid has been getting bullied for years now. He has told the people that he depends on to protect him. They have prevented nothing. It is four years later and he is still getting bullied.

    You can complain and point the finger at the school and the parents. They are rightfully blaimed for not preventing this situation. You can point the finger at the bully/bullies, they are in the wrong for this situation. There are plenty of people involved and plenty of blame to place on all of them, for this situation.
    But blaming people doesn't solve anything.

    Shoulda, woulda, coulda, DIDNT. That sums up every solution or possible solution that involves Billy depending on someone else for his protection thus far. The fact that he is in the situation, I can agree, is not his fault. It is unfair and perhaps incredibly unlucky. But he is in the situation. And his protectors have failed in their supposed duty. I just don't see another option for the kid other than 'manning up' and for (probably) for the first time in his life, rely on only himself to solve the problem. The fact that this problem has persisted for four years tells me he is unwilling to attempt self-reliance and that is why I condem him.

    So tell us more about your e-peen is so fuckin' huge. The whole robotic objective tone you're forcing down a funnel onto the posts helps, really. Now it's not just an e-peen, it's a robo e-peen due to objectivist apathy towards the suffering of others! Fuck yeah or something.

    Fiaryn on
    Soul Silver FC: 1935 3141 6240
    White FC: 0819 3350 1787
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Nova_C wrote: »
    wawkin wrote: »
    Shoulda, woulda, coulda, DIDNT. That sums up every solution or possible solution that involves Billy depending on someone else for his protection thus far. The fact that he is in the situation, I can agree, is not his fault. It is unfair and perhaps incredibly unlucky. But he is in the situation. And his protectors have failed in their supposed duty. I just don't see another option for the kid other than 'manning up' and for (probably) for the first time in his life, rely on only himself to solve the problem. The fact that this problem has persisted for four years tells me he is unwilling to attempt self-reliance and that is why I condem him.

    I get the feeling that you really REALLY don't understand what happens when people are victimized. Hey, it's great you think everything is so simple and that throwing a few punches solves problems. My belief is that if he starts fighting back, he'll have to fight all the time.

    Can you even grasp the idea that there is enough kids who want to hurt him that they organize themselves through facebook? That they record beating him up for bragging about later on? This is not some schoolyard tussle. This is the systematic torture and abuse of a lone individual by a large group.

    I think you can fuck right off with your "Billy is dumb if he doesn't just teach EVERY OTHER FUCKING KID IN THE SCHOOL a lesson." How many fights would he be in before he gets expelled or outright charged. It's a no win situation no matter how much you want to say it's not.

    So far no one has denied that standing up to bullies can work in some cases. I've been watching for that claim so that I could smash it, and it hasn't come up. However that's entirely situation-dependent. In my situation the kids who tried to start shit with me didn't have popular-support, and I'm pretty clearly fucked in the head, at that time in my life anger-management in particular was a problem. So when one of the bullies decided to escalate to physicality instead of just calling me names he found himself held on his toes against a locker by my arm across his throat, and he did never bother me again. This was only possible, however, because as I mentioned the bully lacked popular-support, and because I'm off my fucking nut. It is unreasonable for me to expect every bullying situation to be like mine, it is outright stupid for me to expect everyone who gets bullied to be as psychologically fucked up as I am. This isn't really arguing against you, Nova_C, I just thought the anecdote might give some kind of useful perspective to the conversation.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited March 2008
    So far no one has denied that standing up to bullies can work in some cases. I've been watching for that claim so that I could smash it, and it hasn't come up. However that's entirely situation-dependent. In my situation the kids who tried to start shit with me didn't have popular-support, and I'm pretty clearly fucked in the head, at that time in my life anger-management in particular was a problem. So when one of the bullies decided to escalate to physicality instead of just calling me names he found himself held on his toes against a locker by my arm across his throat, and he did never bother me again. This was only possible, however, because as I mentioned the bully lacked popular-support, and because I'm off my fucking nut. It is unreasonable for me to expect every bullying situation to be like mine, it is outright stupid for me to expect everyone who gets bullied to be as psychologically fucked up as I am. This isn't really arguing against you, Nova_C, I just thought the anecdote might give some kind of useful perspective to the conversation.

    I don't disagree, VC. In the case of one on one bullying, certainly standing up for oneself can, and usually is, effective. But Wawkin wants Billy to stand against a large group of kids who've organized themselves in order to keep him powerless. And powerless he will remain no matter what he does unless those with greater power (IE, the police) step in to protect him.

    Nova_C on
  • ViolentChemistryViolentChemistry __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2008
    Nova_C wrote: »
    So far no one has denied that standing up to bullies can work in some cases. I've been watching for that claim so that I could smash it, and it hasn't come up. However that's entirely situation-dependent. In my situation the kids who tried to start shit with me didn't have popular-support, and I'm pretty clearly fucked in the head, at that time in my life anger-management in particular was a problem. So when one of the bullies decided to escalate to physicality instead of just calling me names he found himself held on his toes against a locker by my arm across his throat, and he did never bother me again. This was only possible, however, because as I mentioned the bully lacked popular-support, and because I'm off my fucking nut. It is unreasonable for me to expect every bullying situation to be like mine, it is outright stupid for me to expect everyone who gets bullied to be as psychologically fucked up as I am. This isn't really arguing against you, Nova_C, I just thought the anecdote might give some kind of useful perspective to the conversation.

    I don't disagree, VC. In the case of one on one bullying, certainly standing up for oneself can, and usually is, effective. But Wawkin wants Billy to stand against a large group of kids who've organized themselves in order to keep him powerless. And powerless he will remain no matter what he does unless those with greater power (IE, the police) step in to protect him.

    That would be why I keep calling his expectations crazy.

    ViolentChemistry on
  • wawkinwawkin Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    I dont recall stating that 'standing up for yourself' inherently refers to resorting to violence. So you all are gonna have to repost your opinions witht hat in mind. Others may have stated it, you may have stated it. I have not.

    wawkin on
    Talkin to the robbery expert.

    "This is where I say something profound and you bow, so lets just skip to your part."
  • MahnmutMahnmut Registered User regular
    edited March 2008
    After four years of victimization, you expect him to -- what? Charm all his persecutors with the social skills he's had such great opportunities to develop? Be so normal and well-adjusted and sweet <3<3 that his teachers won't assume--as one did--that he probably had it coming? Hypnotise the useless administration into being useful?

    Mahnmut on
    Steam/LoL: Jericho89
Sign In or Register to comment.