The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
although they're less so now, ever since businesses realized that the tax structure there meant they actually lost money after making a certain amount of profit
and libertarians are for almost no government involvement whatsoever, so I don't see how that's not far right.
the scandinaviaian countries seem to be doing rather well though
that's because they aren't socialist but sure thing
they're about as socialist as most countries come, brodysseus
yes that is why there is rampant capitalist companies with freedom of choice in career with little government controls on production
i think you're erring to the extreme version of socialism
you forgettin about the third way or what
edit whoops third not middle
that's socialized democracy, which is completely different and actually works even though they lose out on a lot of businesses due to the excess tax burden
PiptheFair on
0
ZeroFillFeeling much better.A nice, green leaf.Registered Userregular
So is there any media around that doesn't have a blatant agenda this election?
I just read an article in Newsweek that was supposed to be about Hillary Clinton's experience as First Lady and it was basically a bunch of people calling her a bitch.
And now cnn.com has projected Obama as the winner in North Carolina with 11% of the precincts reporting, but Clinton's ahead in in Indiana with 47% reported, yet there's no projected winner.
Although to be fair, the gap is a lot larger in North Carolina. But still.
cnn.com made that projection based off exit polls. it was projected when the polls closed, with 0% reporting.
meanwhile, exit polls out of indiana don't suggest a strong enough trend to project it based off that info alone. and if they haven't called it yet, it's probably because exit polls suggest Obama will do well in areas that haven't reported yet.
Well, in that case, they should label it "projected winner based on exit polls" or something.
It just seems shady to me. Not that I doubt Obama will win NC, it just strikes me as a little too eager to declare it on the part of CNN.
if you want to learn more about it, there's a link at the bottom of the page called 'How CNN projects winners'
you should read it. it's about how CNN projects winners
the wook on
0
Munkus BeaverYou don't have to attend every argument you are invited to.Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPAregular
So is there any media around that doesn't have a blatant agenda this election?
I just read an article in Newsweek that was supposed to be about Hillary Clinton's experience as First Lady and it was basically a bunch of people calling her a bitch.
And now cnn.com has projected Obama as the winner in North Carolina with 11% of the precincts reporting, but Clinton's ahead in in Indiana with 47% reported, yet there's no projected winner.
Although to be fair, the gap is a lot larger in North Carolina. But still.
cnn.com made that projection based off exit polls. it was projected when the polls closed, with 0% reporting.
meanwhile, exit polls out of indiana don't suggest a strong enough trend to project it based off that info alone. and if they haven't called it yet, it's probably because exit polls suggest Obama will do well in areas that haven't reported yet.
Well, in that case, they should label it "projected winner based on exit polls" or something.
It just seems shady to me. Not that I doubt Obama will win NC, it just strikes me as a little too eager to declare it on the part of CNN.
if you want to learn more about it, there's a link at the bottom of the page called 'How CNN projects winners'
you should read it. it's about how CNN projects winners
Now I don't have to click the link.
Dammit wook.
Way to spoil the ending.
Munkus Beaver on
Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
Posts
although they're less so now, ever since businesses realized that the tax structure there meant they actually lost money after making a certain amount of profit
and libertarians are for almost no government involvement whatsoever, so I don't see how that's not far right.
far bottom right
where neocons and conservs are top right
that's socialized democracy, which is completely different and actually works even though they lose out on a lot of businesses due to the excess tax burden
so the necrons are just ancient libertarians
it has corso glasses over corso glasses
because it does not use the major defining aspect of socialism, being government controlling the means of production
that is accurate
if you want to learn more about it, there's a link at the bottom of the page called 'How CNN projects winners'
you should read it. it's about how CNN projects winners
Now I don't have to click the link.
Dammit wook.
Way to spoil the ending.
obama winning NC in a landslide
and
clinton barely winning IN, when Gary hasn't even reported in yet (gary is obamas stronghold in IN basically)
from taxes
you still pay for it
right and then they pay for it
PARKER, YOU'RE FIRED! <-- My comic book podcast! Satan look here!
I hate to do this but, fixed.
what
where are you guys getting your numbers
he's 14 down in indiana
garys starting to report in i think
hyuandai huandia oh i wish there was an adblock for video feeds
:arrow:
SE++ Map Steam
tfs, I am an unironic libertarian
can we still be pals?
SE++ Map Steam
Make Hillary look like an idiot, for America.