The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

About to spend 5000 dollars on a computer.

2

Posts

  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Find a way to budget a big-ass 1080p television as a monitor; that ought to eat up a good chunk without becoming completely obsolete in three or four years.

    Daedalus on
  • wakkawawakkawa Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I wish I had a newer macbook pro. I havee on from a couple years ago issued by my school, and oh god its a piece of shit.

    wakkawa on
  • EvilMuffinEvilMuffin Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Ok guys, guide me here, what should I do for a moniter, two 30s, a huge ass plasma, or three 24s. I know very little about displays.

    EvilMuffin on
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    Dark Moon wrote: »
    Oboro wrote: »
    Have you considered yet that using the entirety of the alloted $7000, just for the sake of using the entirety of the alloted $7000, may not reflect all that well upon you with this company? They're obviously rather serious about you signing on with them in whatever capacity this is, and they obviously have some money, but I'm not sure you want to come into the workplace as "the guy who sent us a $6999.96 bill when we gave him a ceiling of $7000."

    If the best machine you can envision building is only a few thousand dollars, for Christ's sake, curtail your spending at a few thousand dollars.

    This seems highly unlikely. If they wanted him to spend less than $7k, they would have given him a ceiling of less than $7k. I see no reason for the employer to look down on him for spending within his allotted budget, as doing so would make him and his company look like idiots who don't know how to budget.

    I highly recommend a dual or, if you can swing it, triple monitor setup. Three Dell 24" monitors side by side would be dreamlike if you ever have to do spreadsheets, use photo editing software, browse the internet or have a large number of text documents on screen at once. And that's not considering the possibility of games using multiple monitors, which many can.

    If you want to be totally awesome, rotate two of them 90 degrees so they are longer top-to-bottom. It's a much better way to read web pages, write code, work in most Office docs, etc. Then use the third as a normally configured monitor for games or movies or whatever.

    Doc on
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    EvilMuffin wrote: »
    Ok guys, guide me here, what should I do for a moniter, two 30s, a huge ass plasma, or three 24s. I know very little about displays.

    Two 30s is good. Don't mess with SLI, though - just have each video card driving its own monitor and the performance will be better.

    Doc on
  • EvilMuffinEvilMuffin Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I most deffinatly want to use the quad SLI for gaming, does that mean no dual or tri monitor set ups?

    EvilMuffin on
  • DragDrag Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    EvilMuffin wrote: »
    Ok guys, guide me here, what should I do for a moniter, two 30s, a huge ass plasma, or three 24s. I know very little about displays.

    Or, you could get one of these babies for a cool $2500 if you're looking to blow the rest of that money real fast.

    Drag on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    EvilMuffin wrote: »
    I most deffinatly want to use the quad SLI for gaming, does that mean no dual or tri monitor set ups?

    You're missing the point: putting each monitor on its own card will better improve game performance than SLI. If you must, just do a dual SLI on the gaming monitor or whatever.

    Doc on
  • EvilMuffinEvilMuffin Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Could you please be a bit more elaborate as to how that set up could out preform the quad set up. I admit I am not that computer savy but I don't see how those numbers could add up.

    EvilMuffin on
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    EvilMuffin wrote: »
    Could you please be a bit more elaborate as to how that set up could out preform the quad set up. I admit I am not that computer savy but I don't see how those numbers could add up.

    You don't get a 100% improvement in games using SLI by adding another GPU. As you add GPUs, performance doesn't scale in a linear fashion. Thus, you'd be better off having two of the cards driving one monitor and one or two cards driving other monitors, since it would take the load of the other monitor(s) off of the SLI/gaming cards.

    Feel free to throw money into the pit of quad SLI if you'd like, I won't stop you. I just think it's exceptionally silly, especially when you can't have more than one monitor with SLI enabled, so you'd be kind of stuck in that regard.

    Doc on
  • contrabandcontraband Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    It's got something to do with the current SLI technologies. You'd think having four video cards is as good as having four video cards, but the way the data is parsed and sent to each card is in no way optimized. None of the cards will be processing enough data to be an effective purchase. The technology right now really isn't worth it.

    Sure, you could try for the shotgun approach by just throwing more money at it and getting bigger numbers, but if you don't want to regret a crazyhuge purchase like this in a couple years, buying smarter > buying bigger.

    IMO, follow others' advice and invest in something that will last you through to your next computer when this one goes obsolete (because, remember, it will.) If I had your budget, I'd get two insane monitors. 30".

    contraband on
    sigxw0.jpg
  • dlinfinitidlinfiniti Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    you know how you can burn through your money?
    big professional grade wacom tablet
    *drool*

    oh and of course optimus maximus keyboard (~$1500 US)

    dlinfiniti on
    AAAAA!!! PLAAAYGUUU!!!!
  • noobertnoobert Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Doesn't SLi not support multiple displays anyway?

    noobert on
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    noobert wrote: »
    Doesn't SLi not support multiple displays anyway?

    Yeah, unless they fixed that, when you turn on Sli, it only outputs through monitor 1. Also, if you want to game on it, don't get a Mac. Even though they have decent hardware, their video card options are very limited, and need more expensive versions for the same type of card.

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    Spoit wrote: »
    noobert wrote: »
    Doesn't SLi not support multiple displays anyway?

    Yeah, unless they fixed that, when you turn on Sli, it only outputs through monitor 1. Also, if you want to game on it, don't get a Mac. Even though they have decent hardware, their video card options are very limited, and need more expensive versions for the same type of card.

    My understanding is that it's OSX that has the problem, not the hardware. He could just run Vista/XP on it and it would be fine.

    Doc on
  • noobertnoobert Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Doc wrote: »
    Spoit wrote: »
    noobert wrote: »
    Doesn't SLi not support multiple displays anyway?

    Yeah, unless they fixed that, when you turn on Sli, it only outputs through monitor 1. Also, if you want to game on it, don't get a Mac. Even though they have decent hardware, their video card options are very limited, and need more expensive versions for the same type of card.

    My understanding is that it's OSX that has the problem, not the hardware. He could just run Vista/XP on it and it would be fine.

    Doc is 100% correct.

    Boot camp into XP/Vista and away you go.

    noobert on
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Doc wrote: »
    Spoit wrote: »
    noobert wrote: »
    Doesn't SLi not support multiple displays anyway?

    Yeah, unless they fixed that, when you turn on Sli, it only outputs through monitor 1. Also, if you want to game on it, don't get a Mac. Even though they have decent hardware, their video card options are very limited, and need more expensive versions for the same type of card.

    My understanding is that it's OSX that has the problem, not the hardware. He could just run Vista/XP on it and it would be fine.

    ? The Sli Problem is in Windows, I didn't even know macs supported it

    EDIT: yeah, checking the ways you can configure mac pros on their websites, they only offer multiple video cards for Ati cards, and the max they have for that is the 2600 (highest nvidia card is a single 8800GT). Way less power than you'd need to power a single 30" for games

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • EvilMuffinEvilMuffin Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I appreciate all your input guys. I think doc is right on the graphics card issue, unfortunately, QUAD sli, is actually only buying two cards. In any case, I think I might not use the SLI as you guys recommend, however I know for sure I deffaintly do not want another MAC. Now guys, how about helping me narrow down the monitor conundrum.

    EvilMuffin on
  • Blake TBlake T Do you have enemies then? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    The other option is to throw a silly amount of money into aftermarket cooling re:water block as well.

    Blake T on
  • PongePonge Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Is this for your own personal computer? Or is it for a high-end workstation that you'll be working on?

    Just asking as I work in high-end 3D graphics and the computer i'd buy for work is radically different than the one I'd use at home.

    Ponge on
  • focused7focused7 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I agree with the above poster. What applications are you going to be using this computer for? I'm assuming since it is being paid for by work your going to be using it primarily for work related stuff. Gaming video cards won't cut it if your doing 3D modeling for like SolidWorks.

    focused7 on
  • EvilMuffinEvilMuffin Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    My Macs will be moved, one will stay at home and one will go to the office, this computer is for gaming and other pleasure relating activities and a huge data back up. I was told to have fun with this and make something I would enjoy. I really really don't mean to sound cocky here and while I totally appreciate you guys being worried I am making an ass of myself I am sure they intended for me to blow this budget on some completely useless technology.

    EvilMuffin on
  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited April 2008
    You know what I would throw some money into?

    A Solid State disc for booting up the thing.

    That could run you anywhere up to $3,000, though the cheaper ones will work perfect as just a boot drive.

    Khavall on
  • chuck steakchuck steak Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Everbody who is naysaying is just jealous. You are living the ultimate dream of every geek who grew up a pc gamer and was never able to have top of the line.

    Anyways, I would personally go for 3 24' monitors over 2 30's. Considering how close you sit to the screen I think 30' would be almost too big for games. The biggest monitor I've used is 21' and that was more than big enough for me. Also, you get overall more realestate with 3.

    chuck steak on
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I'd probably get a 30" samsung widescreen, and a 20-24 inch 4:3 rotateable.

    As far as the machine goes, I'd get something rackmountable and with redundant power supplies, but I don't know how applicable such a machine would be for gaming. Hard drives and power supplies are what I'm always replacing. Hard drive is no big deal cause everything is on insane backup schedules, but when a PS goes it usually takes something down with it.

    Djeet on
  • RedDawnRedDawn Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Get 3 24's and a Matrox Triplehead2go.

    1190184284HKn4bB4Lt3_8_7_l-1.jpg

    RedDawn on
  • EvilMuffinEvilMuffin Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Can anyone recommend a good bang for the buck 30 and a good bang for the buck 24 so that I can compare the two?

    EvilMuffin on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    Doc wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    If the software you principally run is available on the Mac, a Mac is a great way to go - the main reason I don't have one is that Macs cost roughly twice as much as a comparably powered PC, but they're beautiful machines if you can afford them. If you want to game or run PC-exclusive software most of the time, it's kind of silly to buy a Mac and then run Parallels the entire time.

    If they let you, you should get a bad-ass PC and a MacBook Pro.

    Apple Boot Camp lets you run Windows native, and it has ever since Apple switched to X86 Intel processors.

    Aside from that, Apple machines use PCI express and normal video cards and RAM.

    Hell, the processors ALONE on this machine would cost $1500 to buy. Best of luck finding a machine with similar specs for $1400.
    http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?node=home/shop_mac/family/mac_pro

    It's not 1990 any more.

    Those processors are $500 a pop on Newegg. I just priced a comparable machine (and I was using good brands and rounding up) on NewEgg for under $2k (including a couple hundred on a case, though you can get a perfectly decent one for under $100), vs the $2800 for the Mac. That's a big savings, whatever year it is. If you buy a Mac, you are paying at least several hundred dollars for the privilege of having a little apple emblem on your machine. Again, if you have the money, that's not a bad thing. Buying a Mac is sort of like buying Alienware - you pay a premium for name brand and pizazz. (A comparable Alienware machine will run you about $2500, it looks like.)

    But if you think Macs are not more expensive than PC equivalents, you're fucking high. Just saying.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Ponge wrote: »
    Is this for your own personal computer? Or is it for a high-end workstation that you'll be working on?

    Just asking as I work in high-end 3D graphics and the computer i'd buy for work is radically different than the one I'd use at home.

    Pro Video cards like FXQuadros are craptastic for games.

    course any 5000 dollar computer is a total fucking waste for gaming anyway. You'd have to throw in a mountain of doodads jsut to hit the 5000 prcie point. There's a heavy diminishing return there and most of those expesnive extras wi;; be overdated in a year anyway

    nexuscrawler on
  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited April 2008
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Doc wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    If the software you principally run is available on the Mac, a Mac is a great way to go - the main reason I don't have one is that Macs cost roughly twice as much as a comparably powered PC, but they're beautiful machines if you can afford them. If you want to game or run PC-exclusive software most of the time, it's kind of silly to buy a Mac and then run Parallels the entire time.

    If they let you, you should get a bad-ass PC and a MacBook Pro.

    Apple Boot Camp lets you run Windows native, and it has ever since Apple switched to X86 Intel processors.

    Aside from that, Apple machines use PCI express and normal video cards and RAM.

    Hell, the processors ALONE on this machine would cost $1500 to buy. Best of luck finding a machine with similar specs for $1400.
    http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?node=home/shop_mac/family/mac_pro

    It's not 1990 any more.

    Those processors are $500 a pop on Newegg. I just priced a comparable machine (and I was using good brands and rounding up) on NewEgg for under $2k (including a couple hundred on a case, though you can get a perfectly decent one for under $100), vs the $2800 for the Mac. That's a big savings, whatever year it is. If you buy a Mac, you are paying at least several hundred dollars for the privilege of having a little apple emblem on your machine. Again, if you have the money, that's not a bad thing. Buying a Mac is sort of like buying Alienware - you pay a premium for name brand and pizazz. (A comparable Alienware machine will run you about $2500, it looks like.)

    But if you think Macs are not more expensive than PC equivalents, you're fucking high. Just saying.

    I got the case for my computer for free from Newegg during a crazy deal of the day.


    And it's one of those fancy open-window cases.


    Just throwing it out there.

    Khavall on
  • embrikembrik Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    EvilMuffin wrote: »
    Can anyone recommend a good bang for the buck 30 and a good bang for the buck 24 so that I can compare the two?

    Dell makes excellent widescreen flat panels (their UltraSharp models, anyway). Their 24 and 30 are both quite good. (I have their 24, it has all the features you could want in a monitor, and the picture quality is excellent). Keep in mind that once you go larger than 22", the price climbs exponentially.

    Looks like Dell's got a $100 instant rebate on the 24" right now, so it's a nice price at $599. (Model - UltraSharp 2408WFP 24-inch Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor with Height Adjustable Stand)

    embrik on
    "Damn you and your Daily Doubles, you brigand!"

    I don't believe it - I'm on my THIRD PS3, and my FIRST XBOX360. What the heck?
  • DocDoc Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2008
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Doc wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    If the software you principally run is available on the Mac, a Mac is a great way to go - the main reason I don't have one is that Macs cost roughly twice as much as a comparably powered PC, but they're beautiful machines if you can afford them. If you want to game or run PC-exclusive software most of the time, it's kind of silly to buy a Mac and then run Parallels the entire time.

    If they let you, you should get a bad-ass PC and a MacBook Pro.

    Apple Boot Camp lets you run Windows native, and it has ever since Apple switched to X86 Intel processors.

    Aside from that, Apple machines use PCI express and normal video cards and RAM.

    Hell, the processors ALONE on this machine would cost $1500 to buy. Best of luck finding a machine with similar specs for $1400.
    http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?node=home/shop_mac/family/mac_pro

    It's not 1990 any more.

    Those processors are $500 a pop on Newegg. I just priced a comparable machine (and I was using good brands and rounding up) on NewEgg for under $2k (including a couple hundred on a case, though you can get a perfectly decent one for under $100), vs the $2800 for the Mac. That's a big savings, whatever year it is. If you buy a Mac, you are paying at least several hundred dollars for the privilege of having a little apple emblem on your machine. Again, if you have the money, that's not a bad thing. Buying a Mac is sort of like buying Alienware - you pay a premium for name brand and pizazz. (A comparable Alienware machine will run you about $2500, it looks like.)

    But if you think Macs are not more expensive than PC equivalents, you're fucking high. Just saying.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117143
    $724 per quad-core processor that's in the baseline Mac Pro.

    Apple machines are about as expensive as a high-end PC put together for you by any other company, so they aren't "overpriced" any more than, say, a Dell. I don't know why people still are all over Apple in this regard considering that they are more or less middle of the pack in terms of charging you for the logo on their PCs. They sell premium hardware at a price that's very competitive for that market.

    Doc on
  • SpoitSpoit *twitch twitch* Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    EvilMuffin wrote: »
    Can anyone recommend a good bang for the buck 30 and a good bang for the buck 24 so that I can compare the two?

    Quite frankly, with the niche status of such large monitors, there really isn't such a thing as a good bang for buck, but conversely, all of the 30" monitors are going to be pretty darn good quality. Personally, while I don't have any experience working with them (so take my advice with a bucket of salt) I've used some of the smaller Dell Ultrasharp monitors, and they have the best color reproduction I've ever seen, though the refresh rate could be a bit better

    Spoit on
    steam_sig.png
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    premium advice:

    proc: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 minimum that you will overclock, or any model higher than that if you have money to burn and want to make overclocking easier (higher multiplier all the way up to unlocked multiplier)

    cpu heatsink: there are a few choices like the Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (paired with a great fan like the Scythe S-Flex SFF21F) or the Noctua NH-U12P

    mobo: Depends what your brand is, but ASUS, Intel and Gigabyte boards are all pretty good. You'll want an X38 or X48 based board if you're not doing SLI, OR an Nvidia 790i board if you're doing SLI

    memory: You'll want at least 2GB of ram, more likely 4GB with the money you have, at least DDR2 6400 if a DDR2 board, and the one of the Micron Z9 based sticks if using DDR3

    HDD: Raptors are only winning in seek times nowadays - you'll instead want the new 320ish per platter density drives, like the 3200 AAKS (not sure on exact model # there) or 6400AAKS (640GB) drives from Western Digital. They are FASTER than the Raptor.

    back up HDD: something with as much space as you can afford. You could RAID 2 of the 320's together in RAID 0, but you HAVE TO COMMIT to a regular backup plan to a 3rd internal drive.

    Video: a tough one depending on the resolutions you'll be pushing. An 8800 GTX/Ultra is still the best for really high resolutions, but the G92 based cards (8800GTS 512/9800GTX) are better in every other regard. Ideally you'd get something cheap now (Galaxy 8800 GTS 512) and get a 9900 GTX when they come out - which will be the first truly new architecture in a long while

    audio: onboard or for gaming - Creative X-Fi - or for discerning audio - there are a couple other brands

    optical - fastest DVDRW from Samsung, LG, whatever

    power: lots of options here, depends on whether you'll be doing SLI or not. I personally love the modular Corsairs but you can check out HardOCP for reviews of lots of beefier wattage PSUs

    case: Antec P182, or CM Stacker 830, or a Lian Li

    display: either a 30" like the Dell WFP 3007-HC, or a good 24" like the Dell 2407, or BenQ FPW241W (sept 07 firmware or later)

    speakers: for 5.1 Logitech Z-5500d or Klipsch ProMedia, same goes for 2.1 (Logi Z 2300 or Klipsch ProMedia)

    Mouse: for gaming: Logitech G5 2007 w/ a steelpad or Logi G9, or G7 if you like wireless. MX Revolution for non gaming

    keyboard: Logitech G15 Keyboard Revision 1 or 2 on your preference

    webcam: Logitech Quickcam Pro 9000

    floppy: they're all the same

    controller: Microsoft XBOX 360 Wireless PC Controller w/ wireless reciever

    external HDD: Western Digital MyBook Home or get your own external enclosure with eSATA and slap another WD or something in it, at LEAST as big as your system drive

    thumbdrive: Corsair GT for speed, at least 4GB, otherwise get the biggest one you can afford with a design you like

    surge protector: you might even want a UPS to prevent corruption or component wear in the event of a blackout or voltage fluctuation

    OS: Windows XP Pro SP2 /OEM AND/OR Windows Vista SP1 OEM. Kinda your preference, but can only get DX10 on the latter.

    Deusfaux on
  • edited April 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • locomotivemanlocomotiveman Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Newegg carries them at least, perhaps they have a huge warehouse full somewhere but I'd guess there is still a market. Sometimes you have something on a disk you need to get off and you find that your disk drive has died perhaps.

    Note, This is with 3.5", perhaps its possible to get 5.25 but I kinda doubt it.

    locomotiveman on
    aquabat wrote:
    I actually worked at work on Saturday. Also I went out on a date with a real life girl.


    Can you like, permanently break the forums?
  • dlinfinitidlinfiniti Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    hes got money to blow, he doesnt just want a dvdrw, he wants blueray
    no scratch that he wants two blue rays

    dlinfiniti on
    AAAAA!!! PLAAAYGUUU!!!!
  • yotesyotes Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Khavall wrote: »
    You know what I would throw some money into?

    A Solid State disc for booting up the thing.

    That could run you anywhere up to $3,000, though the cheaper ones will work perfect as just a boot drive.

    I would like to second this suggestion. They're ridiculously expensive still, but with that kind of budget, I'd totally have to go for the near-zero access times that flash drives provide.

    The super-duper expensive ones are super-duper fast, too.

    yotes on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • contrabandcontraband Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    hahaha

    "raptors beware"

    contraband on
    sigxw0.jpg
  • PongePonge Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Just throwing this in there but would you be able to include a sound-system into your budget? Just saying as you could put maybe 1 or 2 thousand into a reeeeeally nice sound-system and speakers.

    Ponge on
Sign In or Register to comment.