The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I'm running this motherboard, this CPU, windows XP sp2, and currently this RAM. I'd like to get this RAM. Worth it? Or waste of time?
If I do get the RAM, would it be better to leave the two 512 sticks in and then add the two 2gig sticks, or remove the 512 sticks and replace them with the two 2 gig sticks?
"A man is likely to mind his own business when it is worth minding. When it is not, he takes his mind off his own meaningless affairs by minding other people's business." - Eric Hoffer, _The True Believer_
Windows XP is limited to 4GB maximum, so it would make the most sense to simply replace the old sticks with the new.
You should see a performance increase going from 1GB to 2GB or more. From 2 and upwards, the gains are minimal depending on how many applications you have running at once and what their requirements are. So, you could pick up another 512 X 2 set (super cheap) and keep your current memory for a total of 2GB.
With the prices on that memory type, it's not really expensive either way.
I am alost positive that a 32 bit operating system will not recognize more then 3 gig of ram.
Yep - Windows XP locks it at around 3GB, ensuring there is enough address space left for other RAM types (Video, sound, network, etc). If you're planning on sticking with a 32 bit system, just go to 2 GB and call it done.
"A man is likely to mind his own business when it is worth minding. When it is not, he takes his mind off his own meaningless affairs by minding other people's business." - Eric Hoffer, _The True Believer_
Same as XP's, 3 GB for the 32 bit version and 8 terabytes or something for the 64 bit version. 64 bit Vista is much, much better than 64 bit XP, but probably still more hassle than most people want.
That 2 GB package looks good to me.
Fats on
0
Nova_CI have the needThe need for speedRegistered Userregular
Same as XP's, 3 GB for the 32 bit version and 8 terabytes or something for the 64 bit version. 64 bit Vista is much, much better than 64 bit XP, but probably still more hassle than most people want.
That 2 GB package looks good to me.
Well, I haven't had any hassle with Vista 64bit, but I'm apparently in the minority. I guess. Anyway, I'm running Vista 64 on 2GB of RAM anyway. It's good enough for pretty much anything (Although I plan on going to 4GB sometime, I just don't see the need for it yet).
Posts
You should see a performance increase going from 1GB to 2GB or more. From 2 and upwards, the gains are minimal depending on how many applications you have running at once and what their requirements are. So, you could pick up another 512 X 2 set (super cheap) and keep your current memory for a total of 2GB.
With the prices on that memory type, it's not really expensive either way.
Meet Barack Obama
I am almost positive that a 32 bit operating system will not recognize more then 3 gig of ram.
Yep - Windows XP locks it at around 3GB, ensuring there is enough address space left for other RAM types (Video, sound, network, etc). If you're planning on sticking with a 32 bit system, just go to 2 GB and call it done.
Also, what is Vista's limit on memory?
That 2 GB package looks good to me.
Well, I haven't had any hassle with Vista 64bit, but I'm apparently in the minority. I guess. Anyway, I'm running Vista 64 on 2GB of RAM anyway. It's good enough for pretty much anything (Although I plan on going to 4GB sometime, I just don't see the need for it yet).