The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Possible Temporary Federal Gas Tax Abatement

Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right NowDrives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
edited April 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
So gas is at an all time high over over $3.50 a gallon (national average) here in the U.S. over 60 cents higher than this time last year. Well, it seems the federal government is looking to temporarily suspend the federal tax on gas for this summer.

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/24/gas-tax-holiday-mccain-hillary-support-it-obama-changes-his-mind/
John McCain wants to give consumers a break this summer by suspending the federal gas tax. Hillary Clinton says she supports that plan. Barack Obama, despite having supported a similar tax “holiday” in Illinois, now says he’ll oppose it. Apparently, gas prices haven’t gone high enough, even though they were less than half of today’s price in 2000 when he supported it:
In a new policy split in the presidential campaign, Barack Obama opposed a federal gas-tax holiday supported by John McCain, the likely Republican nominee. Hillary Clinton said she would be open to the tax break.
Sen. Obama, who voted for a temporary gas-tax break when he was a state senator in Illinois, rejected a federal tax holiday as bad fiscal policy. The federal gas tax raises money to repair and expand the highway system.
In Illinois in 2000, Sen. Obama voted for a six-month, five-percentage point break on the state’s 6.25% gas sales tax. The reduction of the tax, which goes into a general revenue fund, passed on a 55-1 vote and included measures designed to ensure that the benefits of the tax break reached consumers. At one point, Sen. Obama jokingly asked on the Senate floor whether it would be possible to install placards on gas-station pumps telling motorists he had helped win temporary price relief.
When some state legislators tried to make the suspension permanent before it expired, Sen. Obama spoke out against that measure but defended his vote for the holiday, according to transcripts posted on the legislature’s Web site.
“I originally voted for the suspension because I thought that it was extraordinary circumstances, given the huge hike in prices,” he said at the time. Gas prices averaged $1.52 a gallon in March 2000.
Hey, if we put up placards at the pump that give Obama the credit, will he vote for it this time? And could he come up with a more foolish explanation of his opposition? Did he and his campaign think that no one would go back and check the 2000 price to see how it compares to 2008?
Actually, a good case could be made for opposition to the gas tax holiday, but it won’t come from Barack Obama. The removal of the tax for three months only temporarily addresses high gas prices, and in the least effective manner. It would give a short modicum of relief but would do nothing to reduce the pressures that drive gas prices higher. Instead of declaring tax “holidays”, Congress took take some or all of the following actions:
  • End state fuel-mixture mandates — Our refineries have to produce upwards of 30 different formulations of gasoline for different states. It makes our supply chain brittle when it should be flexible and leaves us vulnerable to sudden price hikes when refineries have problems.
  • Begin expediting the approval process for more refineries — We have not built a new refinery in the US for 30 years. We keep expanding the capacity at existing refineries instead, and that also leaves the supply chain vulnerable to disruption when a refinery has to shut down. They now have to run at full capacity constantly in order to meet demand and keep prices down. Over the last two decades, we also now have to import more and more refined gasoline instead of crude to keep up with the demand, thanks in part to a lack of refinery capacity here in the US.
  • Allow more domestic drilling — Oil, like any commodity, increases in price when demand goes up and supply doesn’t meet it. With China and India vastly increasing their demand, prices have gone up accordingly. The only way to get the prices down is to either reduce demand or increase supply. That means the US has to start using its own resources rather than living off the resources of others.
Congress has dithered on all of these issues for years, and had Washington taken the appropriate action — say in 2000 or so — we would already have seen the benefits from it. The tax holiday would at least give a little temporary relief, but until someone addresses the root causes of high gas prices, holidays from reality won’t solve them.

I think this is a good idea, as I can barely afford to get to and from work/school anymore. It's only temporary, but it should be enough to get people traveling and spending money over the summer, which is in turn good for the economy (which sucks everywhere right now, but always sucks in Cleveland, welcome to our level, everybody else).

Thoughts?

E6LkoFK.png

Moe Fwacky on
«13456

Posts

  • The Green Eyed MonsterThe Green Eyed Monster i blame hip hop Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    My thoughts are -- we're fighting a fucking war. Either bring the troops home or suck it up.

    The Green Eyed Monster on
  • FunkyWaltDoggFunkyWaltDogg Columbia, SCRegistered User regular
    edited April 2008
    I think it's an awful idea. Well thought-out policy changes are what's needed, not temporary election season pandering.

    FunkyWaltDogg on
  • SpeakerSpeaker Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    My understanding is that economists say the lower price will prompt people to drive more, raising the price of gas back up to the starting point.

    Dumb.

    Speaker on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    So, correct me if I'm wrong, but we've got an oil crisis because we, as in the human race, are running the fuck out of oil.

    So how, exactly, does reducing the price (and thus increasing demand, and thus increasing consumption) help with this again?

    Daedalus on
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    Well thought out changes take time and planning, we do need a "right now" solution until said changes can happen. Even if we do build more refineries (which I believe is necessary), it will take 5-10 years to get them up and running. By then gas could be more than $6 a gallon.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • SenjutsuSenjutsu thot enthusiast Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    To lower the price of gas, politicians would like to suspend the gas tax

    lowering gas taxes will lead to increased demand

    increased demand leads to higher prices


    This plan? This plan is well thought out

    Senjutsu on
  • FunkyWaltDoggFunkyWaltDogg Columbia, SCRegistered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    Well thought out changes take time and planning, we do need a "right now" solution until said changes can happen. Even if we do build more refineries (which I believe is necessary), it will take 5-10 years to get them up and running. By then gas could be more than $6 a gallon.

    Do we really need an immediate solution, other than reducing consumption? I'm not at all convinced we do.

    FunkyWaltDogg on
  • zerg rushzerg rush Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    1) Temporary gas tax breaks
    2) Oil companies hike prices to the same price they were before the tax break
    3) (Even more) record high profits for oil companies
    4) Congress can't reinstate the old tax because citizens will blame them now


    We need to regulate the fuck out of oil companies in America. Exxon-Mobil made a record 40.6 billion PROFIT in 2007, more than any other company has ever made in any other year ever. Ever. oil_line_graph.jpg

    zerg rush on
  • GoodOmensGoodOmens Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Given that I have no idea how much money the gas tax actually takes in, and I'm too lazy right now to check, how about this: a requirement to channel all the tax revenues from gasoline into research and development into other energy sources. That way the tax that is so hated will actually help lead to a long-term solution.

    'Course, that might be totally idealistic and completely unrealistic.

    So, instead, let's end the fucking war and use some of that money.

    GoodOmens on
    steam_sig.png
    IOS Game Center ID: Isotope-X
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    Daedalus wrote: »
    So, correct me if I'm wrong, but we've got an oil crisis because we, as in the human race, are running the fuck out of oil.

    So how, exactly, does reducing the price (and thus increasing demand, and thus increasing consumption) help with this again?
    If you think we're running out of oil, you're out of your mind. The U.S. has enough oil to last us the next 100 years sitting capped, waiting to be drilled out. Russia has enough oil to supply the world for the next 100 years. These don't include Mexico, Canada or the Arctic Circle.

    We're not running out of oil, we're just importing too much crude, and way to much refined gasoline.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • TeeManTeeMan BrainSpoon Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    So what happens after summer?

    Oh, right, the prices are going to skyrocket o_O

    TeeMan on
    steam_sig.png
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    zerg rush wrote: »
    1) Temporary gas tax breaks
    2) Oil companies hike prices to the same price they were before the tax break
    Part of the tax break would include mandates to make sure the savings are passed down to the consumer.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    TeeMan wrote: »
    So what happens after summer?

    Oh, right, the prices are going to skyrocket o_O
    Prices drop after Labor Day anyway, so they would probably go up some, but more or less end up evening out.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    So, correct me if I'm wrong, but we've got an oil crisis because we, as in the human race, are running the fuck out of oil.

    So how, exactly, does reducing the price (and thus increasing demand, and thus increasing consumption) help with this again?
    If you think we're running out of oil, you're out of your mind. The U.S. has enough oil to last us the next 100 years sitting capped, waiting to be drilled out. Russia has enough oil to supply the world for the next 100 years. These don't include Mexico, Canada or the Arctic Circle.

    We're not running out of oil, we're just importing too much crude, and way to much refined gasoline.

    Well until we actually have this gloriously black fluid in our tanks, we're effectively running out of oil because demand is increasing in other places that also import oil.

    Malkor on
    14271f3c-c765-4e74-92b1-49d7612675f2.jpg
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    Malkor wrote: »
    Well until we actually have this gloriously black fluid in our tanks, we're effectively running out of oil because demand is increasing in other places that also import oil.
    Then the government needs to get off their asses and allow more refineries to be built and more locations to be drilled.

    Again though, these things take time, and right now the cost of gas keeps going up and up, and will continue to do so for years until a solution is brokered. We need a break, now, not later. Yes, we need to do something about it for later, but we also need to think about the present situation and do something about it.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Also McCain's plan is a perfect feather to put on a candidate's cap. Really, who cares if it works if it helps him in office, he can blame it all on Bush once he's in charge.

    Malkor on
    14271f3c-c765-4e74-92b1-49d7612675f2.jpg
  • zerg rushzerg rush Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    zerg rush wrote: »
    1) Temporary gas tax breaks
    2) Oil companies hike prices to the same price they were before the tax break
    Part of the tax break would include mandates to make sure the savings are passed down to the consumer.
    I'm sure you can understand my skepticism at the idea that oil companies wouldn't take that chance to royally ream everyone's wallets. I'm equally skeptical that congress would have enough balls to prevent them from doing so.

    zerg rush on
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    Well thought out changes take time and planning, we do need a "right now" solution until said changes can happen. Even if we do build more refineries (which I believe is necessary), it will take 5-10 years to get them up and running. By then gas could be more than $6 a gallon.

    And?
    Wow, holy shit, we'd have to conserve.
    Crap, we can't do that because...because...um...why, again?

    Picardathon on
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    Malkor wrote: »
    Also McCain's plan is a perfect feather to put on a candidate's cap. Really, who cares if it works if it helps him in office, he can blame it all on Bush once he's in charge.
    It also makes Obama look bad for opposing it, especially for the reasons he gives (highway repair and maintenance isn't funded completely by federal gas taxes, only partially)

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • SpeakerSpeaker Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Sen. John McCain wants to eliminate the federal gas tax for three months to ease the pain American voters are feeling at the pump. It's a brilliant political move, but it's lousy public policy.

    McCain's proposal would suspend the 18.4-cent tax on gasoline (and the 24.4-cent levy on diesel fuel) from Memorial Day until Labor Day. He also called on the federal government to stop adding to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, thereby easing demand for oil. His announcement came as crude oil futures hit a record $113.93 a barrel and the average price of gasoline stood at $3.38 a gallon.

    "The effect will be an immediate economic stimulus - taking a few dollars off the price of a tank of gas every time a family, a farmer, or trucker stops to fill up," McCain said during a speech in which he laid out his economic policy. "And because the cost of gas affects the price of food, packaging, and just about everything else, these immediate steps will help to spread relief across the American economy."

    Will they?

    The national average for a gallon of gas is $3.38, and it could hit $3.50 or even $4 before long. Cutting the cost by 18 cents amounts to a 5 percent reduction. The Arizona Republic - McCain's hometown paper - says the average Phoenix commuter will save $23 under McCain's proposal. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials says the average American will save $28.

    On the other hand, the Republic found, suspending the gas tax for three months would free up $88.36 million in consumer spending throughout the greater Phoenix area. And companies like FedEx that are losing their shirts to high fuel prices could use some relief.

    But McCain's proposal could cost the government some $9 billion dollars - and more than 300,000 jobs.
    The tax supports the federal Highway Trust Fund, which finances road projects nationwide and is already facing a $3.4 billion shortfall, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials says. The American Society of Civil Engineers says every dollar invested in highway infrastructure generates $5.40 in economic benefits through reduced delays, improved safety and lower vehicle operating costs. And the federal transportation department says every $1 billion in highway spending creates 34,779 jobs.

    A McCain spokesman told MSNBC the senator favors transferring money from the general fund to make up for the lost gas tax revenue. That, of course, would add to the deficit.

    Many economists and environmentalists also question the wisdom - and efficacy - of suspending or cutting gas taxes. They argue it simply leads to more gasoline consumption - which increases demand (and therefore prices) while exacerbating C02 emissions.
    “You don’t want to stimulate consumption,” Lawrence Goldstein, an economist at the Energy Policy Research Foundation, told the New York Times. “The signal you want to send is the opposite one. Politicians should say that conservation is where people’s mindset ought to be.”

    Instead of rolling back the tax, Goldstein says, the government ought to help low-income Americans pay for gasoline. That would be cheaper and benefit those who need it most.

    For these reasons and others, proposals like McCain's haven't gained much traction in recent years. Lawmakers have tried, and failed at least six times since 2000 to roll back the gas tax, and Bob Dole suggested it during his presidential run 12 years ago.

    As we know, it didn't help Dole win. In fact, he dropped the idea a few months later when he offered a different economic plan
    .

    Speaker on
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    And?
    Wow, holy shit, we'd have to conserve.
    Crap, we can't do that because...because...um...why, again?
    I physically cannot conserve any more gas. I need to drive to and from work and school. This puts about 600 miles a month through my pockets. If gas goes up, I pay more, I can't just stop going to work, the world doesn't work that way.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Yeah, the gas companies are just going to raise prices by however much the tax stops.

    Fencingsax on
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    High oil prices aren't the source of the US's current economic woes. They are a symptom. A very visible symptom that affects everyone, granted, but a symptom nonetheless. Artificially lowering the gas price might* temporarily alleviate that symptom, but it will accomplish nothing to solve the underlying problem.



    *and it won't, as several people already noted in the thread.

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    Malkor wrote: »
    Well until we actually have this gloriously black fluid in our tanks, we're effectively running out of oil because demand is increasing in other places that also import oil.
    Then the government needs to get off their asses and allow more refineries to be built and more locations to be drilled.

    Again though, these things take time, and right now the cost of gas keeps going up and up, and will continue to do so for years until a solution is brokered. We need a break, now, not later. Yes, we need to do something about it for later, but we also need to think about the present situation and do something about it.

    Look, the thing is that turning oil into refined gasoline is nasty.
    BP and the Indiana legislature tried to put an oil refinery up that would dump into the lake, but Illinois knocked the idea down because nobody in the Chicago area wants to have a 13 toed baby.
    Of course, I don't remember refinery capacity ever being an issue until around 2000. I suppose that's because we're using more oil then we were in 2000. The solution of course would be to use less.

    Picardathon on
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    And?
    Wow, holy shit, we'd have to conserve.
    Crap, we can't do that because...because...um...why, again?
    I physically cannot conserve any more gas. I need to drive to and from work and school. This puts about 600 miles a month through my pockets. If gas goes up, I pay more, I can't just stop going to work, the world doesn't work that way.
    Take the bus.

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Yeah, the gas companies are just going to raise prices by however much the tax stops.

    Maybe stop them from colluding and driving the prices up artificially?

    nexuscrawler on
  • durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    And?
    Wow, holy shit, we'd have to conserve.
    Crap, we can't do that because...because...um...why, again?
    I physically cannot conserve any more gas. I need to drive to and from work and school. This puts about 600 miles a month through my pockets. If gas goes up, I pay more, I can't just stop going to work, the world doesn't work that way.

    That really sucks. Unfortunately, I don't think your situation outweighs the horrible stupidity of attempting to alleviate oil issues by pretending they don't exist.

    durandal4532 on
    We're all in this together
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    Malkor wrote: »
    Well until we actually have this gloriously black fluid in our tanks, we're effectively running out of oil because demand is increasing in other places that also import oil.
    Then the government needs to get off their asses and allow more refineries to be built and more locations to be drilled.

    Again though, these things take time, and right now the cost of gas keeps going up and up, and will continue to do so for years until a solution is brokered. We need a break, now, not later. Yes, we need to do something about it for later, but we also need to think about the present situation and do something about it.

    Look, the thing is that turning oil into refined gasoline is nasty.
    BP and the Indiana legislature tried to put an oil refinery up that would dump into the lake, but Illinois knocked the idea down because nobody in the Chicago area wants to have a 13 toed baby.
    Of course, I don't remember refinery capacity ever being an issue until around 2000. I suppose that's because we're using more oil then we were in 2000. The solution of course would be to use less.

    It's not just the United States using more oil, the whole world is using more oil, namely India and China. With these two countries adding to the already high demand that oil is in, prices are naturally rising. We need to import less and use more domestic sources to truly bring prices down.

    The tax abatement isn't meant to be an end-all solution, just something to put a little more money in people's pockets for the summer, when gas prices are expected to hit an ever more all-time high.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    And?
    Wow, holy shit, we'd have to conserve.
    Crap, we can't do that because...because...um...why, again?
    I physically cannot conserve any more gas. I need to drive to and from work and school. This puts about 600 miles a month through my pockets. If gas goes up, I pay more, I can't just stop going to work, the world doesn't work that way.

    Biking is out of the question? You don't have any friends nearby with a car?

    Picardathon on
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    This is like putting a band aid on a giant gaping wound that's all gushing blood everywhere.

    I wouldn't worry about high gas prices for too long. Sooner or later the big car makers are going to start cranking out high fuel efficiency vehicles. Hell just switching from steel to carbon fiber would boost fuel efficiency by 1/3 on average. Combine that with hybrid electric tech and things are looking brighter.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    Richy wrote: »
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    And?
    Wow, holy shit, we'd have to conserve.
    Crap, we can't do that because...because...um...why, again?
    I physically cannot conserve any more gas. I need to drive to and from work and school. This puts about 600 miles a month through my pockets. If gas goes up, I pay more, I can't just stop going to work, the world doesn't work that way.
    Take the bus.

    Yeah, um, how do I put this delicately. Fuck You.

    If you had to take the bus through the neighborhoods I have to in order to get home, at the times I would have to take them at, you would say the same thing.

    Sorry, but no.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • OboroOboro __BANNED USERS regular
    edited April 2008
    Is there really that much on-bus crime? o_O

    Oboro on
    words
  • zerg rushzerg rush Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    No, people are just afraid of others with different skin color.

    zerg rush on
  • MalkorMalkor Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    What exactly happens once the tax is re-instated? If we do use the usual amounts during the summer the world price isn't going to magically stay the same.

    Malkor on
    14271f3c-c765-4e74-92b1-49d7612675f2.jpg
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    Oboro wrote: »
    Is there really that much on-bus crime? o_O
    Dude, this is Cleveland. It's not necessarily a matter of crime on the bus (although it does exist) it's a matter of crime at the bus stops, particularly downtown at night. The last time I took the bus, because my car was in the shop, I was approached by a guy who was very aggressively trying to sell me some thai stick, after I repeatedly told him no. He finally left me alone when the police drove by.

    This was at 6pm, in broad daylight. During the rest of the week, I don't leave here until 10pm.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Oboro wrote: »
    Is there really that much on-bus crime? o_O
    Same question.

    Still, if public transport is too dangerous for you, that leaves carpooling. You've got to be able to find two or three people at your job that live somewhere around you.

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • AdrienAdrien Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    Richy wrote: »
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    And?
    Wow, holy shit, we'd have to conserve.
    Crap, we can't do that because...because...um...why, again?
    I physically cannot conserve any more gas. I need to drive to and from work and school. This puts about 600 miles a month through my pockets. If gas goes up, I pay more, I can't just stop going to work, the world doesn't work that way.
    Take the bus.

    Yeah, um, how do I put this delicately. Fuck You.

    If you had to take the bus through the neighborhoods I have to in order to get home, at the times I would have to take them at, you would say the same thing.

    Sorry, but no.

    So when you say that you physically cannot conserve any gas, what you mean is that you physically don't want to conserve any gas.

    But that's fair.

    Adrien on
    tmkm.jpg
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    Moe Fwacky wrote: »
    Oboro wrote: »
    Is there really that much on-bus crime? o_O
    Dude, this is Cleveland. It's not necessarily a matter of crime on the bus (although it does exist) it's a matter of crime at the bus stops, particularly downtown at night. The last time I took the bus, because my car was in the shop, I was approached by a guy who was very aggressively trying to sell me some thai stick, after I repeatedly told him no. He finally left me alone when the police drove by.

    This was at 6pm, in broad daylight. During the rest of the week, I don't leave here until 10pm.

    Concealed weapon permit.

    Picardathon on
  • Moe FwackyMoe Fwacky Right Here, Right Now Drives a BuickModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited April 2008
    Richy wrote: »
    Oboro wrote: »
    Is there really that much on-bus crime? o_O
    Same question.

    Still, if public transport is too dangerous for you, that leaves carpooling. You've got to be able to find two or three people at your job that live somewhere around you.

    Not with the same schedule I have. This semester I'm downtown from 9:30am-10pm on Tuesday/Thursday, 6-10pm on MW and 2-6pm on Friday.

    Nobody else has this kind of schedule. At least, nobody I know who also lives near me.

    Moe Fwacky on
    E6LkoFK.png

  • HilgerHilger Registered User regular
    edited April 2008
    For these reasons and others, proposals like McCain's haven't gained much traction in recent years. Lawmakers have tried, and failed at least six times since 2000 to roll back the gas tax, and Bob Dole suggested it during his presidential run 12 years ago.

    As we know, it didn't help Dole win. In fact, he dropped the idea a few months later when he offered a different economic plan.
    In Dole's defense, he wasn't running during a period of time where gasoline is $4 dollars a gallon. I feel really bad for Obama, because rising gas prices is just one of those issues that the average person feels irrationally strongly about. It worries me that it's just going to appear like he wants people to suffer, even though the federal gas tax has remained flat at the same time that gasoline prices have risen so highly, so it's obvious that there are about a thousand other more important factors that determine the price of gas (like the falling dollar being at parity with Canada, where the U.S. imports most of it gasoline). As people have pointed out, removing the federal gas tax will likely result in increased consumption, and the price of gasoline will likely simply reach pre-tax abatement levels, with the added bonus of sharply decreased funding for vital transportation projects.

    Hilger on
Sign In or Register to comment.