The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Turkish court bans Islamic head scarves at universities

BasarBasar IstanbulRegistered User regular
edited July 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
# Story Highlights
# NEW: Turkish court upholds ban on head scarves in universities
# Many see the head scarf as an emblem of political Islam
# Islamic-oriented government locked in power struggle with secular groups
# Turkey's chief prosecutor seeking to disband "anti-secular" ruling party

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) -- Turkey's top court has ruled Islamic head scarves cannot be allowed at universities. The decision is a defeat for the Islamic-oriented government, which tried to free the Islamic attire as a matter of religious and personal freedoms.

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/06/05/turkey.scarfs.ap/index.html

Sweeeeeeeeet. A big "FUCK YOU" to the current government of Turkey.

Put it in your tiny brains you frickin radical islamist Osamas! Turkey will always remain secular no matter how hard you try. If you want to live in a country like Saudi Arabia, move there.

Now only if I can get that piece of dogcrap PM to kiss my ass, rest for a while and continue kissing it in an endless cycle.

i live in a country with a batshit crazy president and no, english is not my first language

Basar on
«134567

Posts

  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    ...

    Couscous on
  • geckahngeckahn Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Youre not going to get a friendly reception here.

    geckahn on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    So why shouldn't they be allowed to wear head scarves?

    Couscous on
  • TeaSpoonTeaSpoon Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Your tone is not doing you any favors. For the purpose of the thread, can we all pretend Basar was polite and respectful? Please?

    TeaSpoon on
  • CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Perhaps its for the best, if the Turkish military perceives the government is getting a little too Islamic they'll storm in there and remove it anyway. Religion and politics should always remain separate for the greater good.

    Casual on
  • edited June 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Are they banning all religious emblems at the university?

    Edit: Also, what about people who don't want the wind blowin' their hair?

    Quid on
  • edited June 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    The most proWestern party there is the mildly Islamic party. Fuck the military.

    Couscous on
  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Hey Basar, way to make people hate atheists.

    DarkPrimus on
  • NeadenNeaden Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    I can understand why they would do this, though I am not sure if I agree with it or not. It is different then a Christian wearing a cross in my opinion because there is no social pressure to wear a cross. I'm Catholic and don't wear a cross, scapular, saint's medal or anything else and have never felt any pressure by anyone to change this. However many women in heavily Islamic countries wear head scarves because of social pressure. There have also been attacks against women who don't wear head scarves in some countries. By banning the head scarves the courts hope to alleviate this social pressure and threats of violence against the women. Whether this will work or not I am not sure of.

    Neaden on
  • geckahngeckahn Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    titmouse wrote: »
    The most proWestern party there is the mildly Islamic party. Fuck the military.

    Yup. They are the most pro EU party.

    Theres nothing wrong with a mildly Islamic party. Remember - All of our parties are at least mildly Christian.

    geckahn on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    I demand that Germany bans the Christian Democratic Union.

    Couscous on
  • QinguQingu Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    I'm an atheist who is completely opposed to political Islam, and I think this is a bad idea. Not only is such a ban a compromise on the central principles of secular society (freedom of expression and ideology), it also seems to give Islamists a weapon. Many religious groups find it easy to unite under the banner of "oppression," especially Western oppression. By banning headscarves you are simply giving them more ammo.

    This is not the way to reduce the influence of political Islam.

    Also, Christ man, please don't conflate Turkey's political Islam with al-Qaeda.

    Qingu on
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Aegeri wrote: »
    I'm sorry, but I may be an atheist but I can't agree with this on principle. Just like I can't agree with disallowing people to wear things like a Christian cross while they are at work or whatever. There is a point where you can't honestly say wearing a symbol of religious faith is the equivalent of pushing that religion down someones throat.
    The thing is, there are people trying to push religion (specifically, Islam) down people's throats in Turkey. There's a lot of them, and they have non-negligible political power. Pushing the use of the head scarf, while as innocent as wearing a cross or kippah by itself, is only a stepping stone for them to then push some other, more fundamental Islamic rule.

    I think we can all agree that an Islamic state (or a religious state in general) is not a good thing. And Turkey, while secular for now, is facing strong political and social pressure to become an Islamic state. Any measures to resist these pressures are a good thing.

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Qingu wrote: »
    I'm an atheist who is completely opposed to political Islam, and I think this is a bad idea. Not only is such a ban a compromise on the central principles of secular society (freedom of expression and ideology), it also seems to give Islamists a weapon. Many religious groups find it easy to unite under the banner of "oppression," especially Western oppression. By banning headscarves you are simply giving them more ammo.

    This is not the way to reduce the influence of political Islam.

    No it isn't but the Turkish military is very powerful, very temperamental and VERY secular, if taking a hit like this prevents them from launching a coup then it’s worth it.

    Casual on
  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    TeaSpoon wrote: »
    Your tone is not doing you any favors. For the purpose of the thread, can we all pretend Basar was polite and respectful? Please?
    I'm going to reiterate this, because this is the only way this thread will lead to an intelligent, interesting discussion rather than an endless stream of well-deserved "fuck off Basar".

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • QinguQingu Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Richy wrote: »
    The thing is, there are people trying to push religion (specifically, Islam) down people's throats in Turkey. There's a lot of them, and they have non-negligible political power. Pushing the use of the head scarf, while as innocent as wearing a cross or kippah by itself, is only a stepping stone for them to then push some other, more fundamental Islamic rule.

    I think we can all agree that an Islamic state (or a religious state in general) is not a good thing. And Turkey, while secular for now, is facing strong political and social pressure to become an Islamic state. Any measures to resist these pressures are a good thing.
    But is banning headscarves actually an effective measure against the rise of political Islam?

    My instinct is no, for the reasons I outlined above. What are the reasons why you think this is successful? (I certainly could be wrong).

    Qingu on
  • edited June 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Qingu wrote: »
    But is banning headscarves actually an effective measure against the rise of political Islam?

    My instinct is no, for the reasons I outlined above. What are the reasons why you think this is successful? (I certainly could be wrong).
    My instinct is, don't underestimate it. The headscarf is very symbolic of Islam, and symbols do have power.

    Getting the headscarf in would have set a precedent in two ways, in my opinion. First, it would have given a legal foundation for an item in their religious-political agenda - granted, just a symbolic piece of clothing, not anything major, but it's still something they can build on. By banning that, the courts are insuring the religious-political factions can't even get their foot in the door.

    And second, if a lot of women on campus wear the headscarf, peer-pressure will set in and push more women to wear the headscarf. And once you get people to accept one, even small, religion rule, it's easier to get them to accept the next one, and then the next one...

    But again, that's my instinct, it's not a study I read. And anyway, I need to get to work now, so I won't be around to debate this again until tonight.

    Richy on
    sig.gif
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Pushing a group to the fringe instead of allowing them to participate in a democracy as long as the obey the laws works wonders and can in no way backfire.

    Couscous on
  • Psycho Internet HawkPsycho Internet Hawk Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    To anyone who supports this, I beg the question: would you also support a ban on Yarmulkes?

    The fact that some people who wear headscarves do terrible things has no bearing on whether or not they should be allowed, particularly when there are a number of people who wear them who are not a threat to anyone.

    Also, Richy, they're not just insuring religious insitutions can't get their foot in the door, they're ensuring devout Muslim women can't get their foot in the door, which certainly isn't going to make conservative Islam any more liberal. Attacking personal symbols of religion isn't going to change anything, it's just going to make you look like a petty dick.

    Psycho Internet Hawk on
    ezek1t.jpg
  • NeadenNeaden Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    It is not the idea that people wearing head scarves are doing bad things. By and large radical Islamists tend to be males. It is the idea that there is a lot of social pressure and threatened violence against women who do not wear these head scarves. To use Saudi Arabia as an example, it is illegal for a woman to go outside without wearing a hijab. Some women wear it because they feel like it is the appropriate thing to do, but a lot of them wear it because otherwise they will be thrown in prison, called sluts and whores, and possibly killed.

    Neaden on
  • ElkiElki get busy Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited June 2008
    Heh. I wonder when the military will get involved. To, you know, ruin Turkey's chance of getting in Europe for good, so as to protect secularism and democracy.

    Elki on
    smCQ5WE.jpg
  • Psycho Internet HawkPsycho Internet Hawk Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Neaden wrote: »
    It is not the idea that people wearing head scarves are doing bad things. By and large radical Islamists tend to be males. It is the idea that there is a lot of social pressure and threatened violence against women who do not wear these head scarves. To use Saudi Arabia as an example, it is illegal for a woman to go outside without wearing a hijab. Some women wear it because they feel like it is the appropriate thing to do, but a lot of them wear it because otherwise they will be thrown in prison, called sluts and whores, and possibly killed.

    Fantastic, so we're going to address the problem by ensuring that these oppressed women can't even go to a fucking university.

    Clearly this is a well though-out solution.

    Psycho Internet Hawk on
    ezek1t.jpg
  • QinguQingu Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    To anyone who supports this, I beg the question: would you also support a ban on Yarmulkes?
    My dad used to tell me that if I didn't wear my yarmulke in synagogue, God would strike me with lightning.

    Probably one of the reasons I became an atheist.
    The fact that some people who wear headscarves do terrible things has no bearing on whether or not they should be allowed, particularly when there are a number of people who wear them who are not a threat to anyone.
    Well—I do think Richy has a valid point. Let's be honest here—Islam is an inherently repressive religion that sees women as temptresses of men, and the headscarf is fundamentally both an acknowledgment and a muzzle on this warped view of femininity. It is not something I would like to see propagate in any country, and there is a danger that the headscarf will become a rallying symbol and a way for Muslims to exert peer pressure on women.

    However, compared with the danger of giving Muslims the mantle of "underdog" to rally around, I think it's a wash, and I'd prefer that the country allows freedom of expression.

    Qingu on
  • edited June 2008
    This content has been removed.

  • NeadenNeaden Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Neaden wrote: »
    It is not the idea that people wearing head scarves are doing bad things. By and large radical Islamists tend to be males. It is the idea that there is a lot of social pressure and threatened violence against women who do not wear these head scarves. To use Saudi Arabia as an example, it is illegal for a woman to go outside without wearing a hijab. Some women wear it because they feel like it is the appropriate thing to do, but a lot of them wear it because otherwise they will be thrown in prison, called sluts and whores, and possibly killed.

    Fantastic, so we're going to address the problem by ensuring that these oppressed women can't even go to a fucking university.

    Clearly this is a well though-out solution.

    How does this mean they can't go to university? You do realize that by and large women in Turkey do not wear head scarves right? Now this law may mean that some conservative Muslim women decide not to go to University because they want to wear the head scarves. However I think the question is does the risk and consequences of some that outweigh the risks of social stigma and potential violence that would face the majority of women at these universities if the pressure to wear a head scarf becomes as bad as in some other countries.

    Edit: Gallup has some polls here from Turkish women about their thoughts on the head scarves that I think is fairly relevant

    Neaden on
  • [Tycho?][Tycho?] As elusive as doubt Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    So, I'd like to point out that they are not technically banning anything, they are mearly upholding a ban thats been in place since Ataturk's time. This isn't some radical move against Islam, its upholding the status quo that has been in place for 80 odd years.

    Turkey is a fiercely secular place, and ending this ban would have caused a huge shit storm there, a lot of people are scared at the rise of a more political Islam. This situation cannot be compared to say the head scarf controversy in France, and I dont understand why people are saying this is pushing people "to the fringe", or giving extremists "more ammo".

    [Tycho?] on
    mvaYcgc.jpg
  • Psycho Internet HawkPsycho Internet Hawk Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Neaden wrote: »
    Neaden wrote: »
    It is not the idea that people wearing head scarves are doing bad things. By and large radical Islamists tend to be males. It is the idea that there is a lot of social pressure and threatened violence against women who do not wear these head scarves. To use Saudi Arabia as an example, it is illegal for a woman to go outside without wearing a hijab. Some women wear it because they feel like it is the appropriate thing to do, but a lot of them wear it because otherwise they will be thrown in prison, called sluts and whores, and possibly killed.

    Fantastic, so we're going to address the problem by ensuring that these oppressed women can't even go to a fucking university.

    Clearly this is a well though-out solution.

    How does this mean they can't go to university? You do realize that by and large women in Turkey do not wear head scarves right? Now this law may mean that some conservative Muslim women decide not to go to University because they want to wear the head scarves. However I think the question is does the risk and consequences of some that outweigh the risks of social stigma and potential violence that would face the majority of women at these universities if the pressure to wear a head scarf becomes as bad as in some other countries.

    I don't give a shit about the majority of turkish women. I give a shit about the people who are going to affected by the ban because that's what we're discussing.

    If headscarves are actually so opressive then something tells me "well just don't wear it" isn't really an option. You know what actually might help though? Giving these women greater power through education. Now where would we do that?

    Seriously, it's like saying, "well, you have this terrible disease, but we don't want to treat you because you're disease-ridden."

    Psycho Internet Hawk on
    ezek1t.jpg
  • TeaSpoonTeaSpoon Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    If this were America or other Western countries, I would have been outraged.

    The only way this can have value, even when stifling expression, is it is the dam that keeps Islamic fundies from taking over the government. This is hard pill to swallow. I wonder if the Turkish really are this inclined towards Islam that a small step would snowball into a theocracy. Does anyone have statistics or figures or anything that can illuminate the subject?

    Islam is a religion where half its followers are under severe restriction by the other half, at least when practiced according to fundies. In terms of women, who are the ones wearing the headscarf, it seems rather cynical to believe they would give away their freedoms if allowed, even if it is a expression of faith. If it's a case of peer pressure, I'm not sure if a ban is the right way to deal with this. Maybe a public education campaign?

    In any event, we are not talking about primary/high schools here. Weren't colleges bastions of liberty?

    TeaSpoon on
  • BasarBasar IstanbulRegistered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Neaden wrote: »
    I can understand why they would do this, though I am not sure if I agree with it or not. It is different then a Christian wearing a cross in my opinion because there is no social pressure to wear a cross. I'm Catholic and don't wear a cross, scapular, saint's medal or anything else and have never felt any pressure by anyone to change this. However many women in heavily Islamic countries wear head scarves because of social pressure. There have also been attacks against women who don't wear head scarves in some countries. By banning the head scarves the courts hope to alleviate this social pressure and threats of violence against the women. Whether this will work or not I am not sure of.

    Let me give you an example of pressure.

    My lady cousin is a 24 year old lightly religious secular Turk. She graduated from the Mimar Sinan Arts college, which is about the best college one can go for arts. Her speciality is ceramics. Fortunately for her (at least we thought), Turkish government owns a couple ceramics businesses. These are known worldwide and a career in one these is very desirable. Well, unfortunately for her, even though she graduated with the highest GPA in her class, and several internships, none of these government businesses even returned her applications. Not even an interview. The reason? From the government official's mouth: "Young lady, if you want at least a chance for an interview, you better change that photo on your resume to a one with a headscarve." o_O Fuckin assholes. She had similar responses from any government job she applied to.

    I hope one day we will outlaw headscarves all together.

    Basar on
    i live in a country with a batshit crazy president and no, english is not my first language

  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Basar wrote: »
    I hope one day we will outlaw headscarves all together.
    This isn't really the answer. What if they then refuse to hire her because she's not a man? Do we outlaw men?

    Bama on
  • BasarBasar IstanbulRegistered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Neaden wrote: »
    Neaden wrote: »
    It is not the idea that people wearing head scarves are doing bad things. By and large radical Islamists tend to be males. It is the idea that there is a lot of social pressure and threatened violence against women who do not wear these head scarves. To use Saudi Arabia as an example, it is illegal for a woman to go outside without wearing a hijab. Some women wear it because they feel like it is the appropriate thing to do, but a lot of them wear it because otherwise they will be thrown in prison, called sluts and whores, and possibly killed.

    Fantastic, so we're going to address the problem by ensuring that these oppressed women can't even go to a fucking university.

    Clearly this is a well though-out solution.

    How does this mean they can't go to university? You do realize that by and large women in Turkey do not wear head scarves right? Now this law may mean that some conservative Muslim women decide not to go to University because they want to wear the head scarves. However I think the question is does the risk and consequences of some that outweigh the risks of social stigma and potential violence that would face the majority of women at these universities if the pressure to wear a head scarf becomes as bad as in some other countries.

    I don't give a shit about the majority of turkish women. I give a shit about the people who are going to affected by the ban because that's what we're discussing.

    If headscarves are actually so opressive then something tells me "well just don't wear it" isn't really an option. You know what actually might help though? Giving these women greater power through education. Now where would we do that?

    Seriously, it's like saying, "well, you have this terrible disease, but we don't want to treat you because you're disease-ridden."

    Women can attend university with a headscarve in Iran. I am toally with you on the greatness that has achieved in the past 30 or so years. More power to women? You kidding me, right?

    Basar on
    i live in a country with a batshit crazy president and no, english is not my first language

  • QinguQingu Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    [Tycho?] wrote: »
    So, I'd like to point out that they are not technically banning anything, they are mearly upholding a ban thats been in place since Ataturk's time. This isn't some radical move against Islam, its upholding the status quo that has been in place for 80 odd years.

    Turkey is a fiercely secular place, and ending this ban would have caused a huge shit storm there, a lot of people are scared at the rise of a more political Islam. This situation cannot be compared to say the head scarf controversy in France, and I dont understand why people are saying this is pushing people "to the fringe", or giving extremists "more ammo".
    Whether or not the ban is status quo doesn't really have much to do with whether there should be a ban. Though you have a point that a repeal of the ban might be seen by secularists as giving in to Islamists.

    Qingu on
  • El SkidEl Skid The frozen white northRegistered User regular
    edited June 2008
    So it sounds like the religious groups are pushing the courts into some non-democratic measures in Turkey... which is not good for the democratic government.

    In a Democracy, it would seem totally proper to forbid the mandatory wearing of a religious symbol. For a democracy to forbid wearing a religious symbol at all seems...inappropriate.

    Yes, there are external (well, internal to the country, external to the courts) pressures causing this, but the way a democracy would traditionally want to deal with this kid of situation is to uphold everyone's rights, and try to do something about the pressures themselves.

    It could be the court is completely correct with this ruling according to the laws and charter of rights of the country (if such a thing exists in Turkey), but regardless of the legality, you've just given your opponents a large weapon to say "Look at the government oppressing my religion", "The government isn't a real democracy", "This can't be allowed, we need change".

    As Elki pointed out, the EU won't be looking kindly on this kind of decision, either.

    El Skid on
  • NeadenNeaden Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Wait, why won't the EU like it? Doesn't France have a more strict version of this law on the books?

    Neaden on
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2008
    Elki wrote: »
    Heh. I wonder when the military will get involved. To, you know, ruin Turkey's chance of getting in Europe for good, so as to protect secularism and democracy.

    Turkey has stopped caring about getting into the EU a long time ago.

    Well, the general populace has, anyway. Because they understand it for what it really is: a carrot on a stick.

    Also, everything Richy said. He put it more elaborately than I would have.

    ege02 on
  • geckahngeckahn Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Neaden wrote: »
    Wait, why won't the EU like it? Doesn't France have a more strict version of this law on the books?

    Not for colleges. In elementary and high school no religious wear/necklaces are allowed.

    I also think this is stupid.

    geckahn on
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited June 2008
    I'll write a detailed response tonight.

    ege02 on
Sign In or Register to comment.