The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Very difficult girl situation (Figured out. Mods, you can lock it)

BomanTheBearBomanTheBear Registered User regular
edited June 2008 in Help / Advice Forum
Alright, typically I don't bring this sort of shit online. I consider myself pretty good at dealing with situations involving women, because after making enough mistakes, you just start to get it right. But this one's even more complex than anything I've had to deal with. So I'm bringing this up for three reasons. One, H/A is pretty good natured and not quick to judge. Two, everyone I know personally has an interest and doesn't see the whole story. Three, it's the sort of situation that just a little bit of logic might help illiminate a little better, and I'm too involved to be able to see clearly. For the sake of at least partial anonymity, I'm going to call the girls involved Andrea, Natalie, and Katie. And each one of them individually would be enough of a problem. So here we go.

I'm a senior at Elon University (NC), and I live and work in Greenville, SC. The problem is that all three girls have a thing for me. I've known Natalie since high school, and she's apparently had a thing for me since her sophomore year way back then. We didn't really get close until last year. She's got a pornstar's body and is a very sweet girl. She's way into me, since apparently, I'm a much higher quality guy than the assholes she typically subjects herself to. Unfortunately, she's not very smart, so I don't think I'd really ever have a connection much deeper than close friends (we're currently classless FWBs/casually dating as of a couple weeks ago, the first stable release I've had since I broke up with a serious girlfriend about a year ago). She lives in Greenville, so I'm near her this whole summer. I really can't stress enough how good a lay she is.

Katie is a girl who's cute (but not really a knock out) and lives in Elon. I met her about six months ago through a mutual friend. She was in a long distance relationship at the time, but I had the feeling (which was confirmed through the same mutual friend and then herself a couple days ago) that she had feelings for me. She made a move on me at a party about a month ago right after breaking up with her boyfriend in London (which is what I attributed her action to), but turned out she'd had a thing for me since she'd met me, and was sticking with her boyfriend because she'd heard I get around a good bit (which is unfortunately true). We've made a great connection since I met her since she's deep and very easy to hang with. She's just a great friend to me, which is unfortunate, since she apparently cares about me way more than I deserve.

And then there's Andrea, who's a fucking knockout and someone I can relate to on a deep level. I met her my sophomore year at Elon, and we hit it off really well. Then she transferred down to a school in Florida, and won't be coming back. Now, while she'd been at Elon, apparently, both of us had strong feelings for each other (by the way, I've never done anything more than hugging her), but figured the other one didn't, so we didn't really out each other until she'd been gone for months. So that was about halfway through last semester that I found that out. I work for a company called Fluor Corporation which could possibly send me to the field on a project that's about 40 minutes away from where she goes to school. Besides any trips I might take to visit her and the possibility of this project, I'd probably never see her again.

So there you go, that's my situation. There's no tl;dr, because the thing is such a shitshow. I know there's got to be a right choice, an obvious choice, a choice that makes me happy, and a choice that makes everyone happy. I just hope a couple of those overlap. What do I do, H/A?

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
BomanTheBear on

Posts

  • JeffHJeffH Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    don't go for the long distance, and just have fun with either of the others

    ultimately, it comes down to personal preference i think

    JeffH on
  • RitchmeisterRitchmeister Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Well, who do you prefer out of the two that live near?

    Ritchmeister on
  • BomanTheBearBomanTheBear Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Well, who do you prefer out of the two that live near?
    Well, that's the thing. They're both really fun to hang out with, but Natalie has the bonus of being very comfortable with hooking up, whereas Katie is someone I can actually have conversations about things that matter with.

    BomanTheBear on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • RitchmeisterRitchmeister Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Personally I'd have fun with the pair of them, but I dunno how comfortable you'd feel about that. Just don't specify that you're seeing them exclusively.

    Then you can see how it goes.

    Ritchmeister on
  • CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    So basically it comes down to a hot idiot, a not so hot girl you could have a meaningful connection to or a girl who has both who you may never see again? Ouch tough break.

    Well sounds like you need to make the choice yourself man personally I prefer substance over style hence I would choose Katie but if you are the sort who likes to get around and just wants a good fuck than Natalie may well be your girl. Either way I would avoid Andrea she sounds great but there's not a lot of point in getting a taste of what you cant have.

    Casual on
  • SeptusSeptus Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Well it sounds like you just like Katie as a friend, so that doesn't seem like a decision to make. I see no reason to stop sleeping with Natalie, hopefully as long as she's not under the impression that you'd want a relationship out of it.

    Septus on
    PSN: Kurahoshi1
  • JeffHJeffH Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Do you want to commit to a relationship?

    JeffH on
  • BomanTheBearBomanTheBear Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    JeffH wrote: »
    Do you want to commit to a relationship?
    I wouldn't be against it. Natalie's not deep enough for anything long term, and I just don't quite have the physical attraction to Katie to date her.

    BomanTheBear on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • NostregarNostregar Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    I'm going to go in a different direction here and say, why do you have to pick one of them, and why do you have to do it now? You're stuck in the mindset that "Here are 3 girls that like me and I have to pick one." If you aren't totally satisfied with any of them, why not just wait until you find someone you ARE satisfied with? Just because a girl wants to date you does not mean that you need to reciprocate.

    Basically, from your description you're not 100% into either of the close girls, and the far away one just isn't going to work. So I say, don't get serious with any of them and just wait until something better comes along. You apparently have a good situation going with the hot/dumb girl, so keep going with that as long as you want (since you apparently find sex very important). If you decide you actually do like her alot on a deeper level, go for it. Similarly, keep hanging out with the smart girl. If you decide you actually like her alot, go that way. If you don't develop any deeper feelings for either of them, just wait for someone else to come along or even go looking for someone.

    Once again, you are not obligated to "pick" one of them. Don't get into a relationship you know you're not 100% happy with right from the beginning.

    Nostregar on
  • BomanTheBearBomanTheBear Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Nostregar wrote: »
    I'm going to go in a different direction here and say, why do you have to pick one of them, and why do you have to do it now? You're stuck in the mindset that "Here are 3 girls that like me and I have to pick one." If you aren't totally satisfied with any of them, why not just wait until you find someone you ARE satisfied with? Just because a girl wants to date you does not mean that you need to reciprocate.

    Basically, from your description you're not 100% into either of the close girls, and the far away one just isn't going to work. So I say, don't get serious with any of them and just wait until something better comes along. You apparently have a good situation going with the hot/dumb girl, so keep going with that as long as you want (since you apparently find sex very important). If you decide you actually do like her alot on a deeper level, go for it. Similarly, keep hanging out with the smart girl. If you decide you actually like her alot, go that way. If you don't develop any deeper feelings for either of them, just wait for someone else to come along or even go looking for someone.

    Once again, you are not obligated to "pick" one of them. Don't get into a relationship you know you're not 100% happy with right from the beginning.
    This is certainly true. I guess this stems off the fact that although I'm a pretty calloused, flippant person, I really don't want someone to get hurt by me being selfish.

    BomanTheBear on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • PirateJonPirateJon Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    long distance never works.

    Natalie won't last because you can't connect with her. There's only so many positions you can try.
    Katie is someone I can actually have conversations about things that matter
    That's rare. But if you aren't attracted to her in that way, no point fooling yourself.
    D. None of the above.

    PirateJon on
    all perfectionists are mediocre in their own eyes
  • NostregarNostregar Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Let me present two scenarios for you, then, to illustrate my point.

    1.) You pick one of the girls, let's just say Natalie for ease of writing, to date. You know the relationship won't last, but you do it anyway. By choosing Natalie over Katie, Katie is hurt and disappointed. Then, eventually you break up with Natalie and she is hurt also.

    2.) You don't choose either of them. You keep going with the sexing with Natalie, but make it clear you don't want a relationship. You keep hanging out with Katie, but make it clear you don't want a relationship. Then, you continue looking for someone you like more, such as the girl who moved away (except this new girl won't move, you see, is the idea here). You don't lie to either girl, so they know what is going on. By not picking either of them each will be disappointed that they didn't get picked, but the disappointment is a lot less than it would be if you chose one over the other and will probably go away relatively quickly. Ideally it takes a while to find the "correct" girl, so they are over you by then.


    You'll not I didn't include Andrea. This is because long distance never works.

    Nostregar on
  • BomanTheBearBomanTheBear Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Ah, this is a detail that I neglected to mention. I have many groups of friends that only sortof intersect, and none of the three girls know each other.

    But I am starting to see a pattern. That I should be non-committal until a perfect match comes along. But how close to perfect is good enough? Isn't a flawed relationship the best that flawed people can do?

    BomanTheBear on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • endlesswaltzendlesswaltz Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Like other people said, it's true that you probably shouldn't pick one out of all three.

    Just want to add, please be sure that all of the girls (I think just the two near you since you will be seeing them whether it's for friends or dates) know what your intentions are. Make your intentions known and don't lead them on. You not telling them things because they didn't ask or whatever can lead them on. So tell Katie you have no romantic feelings for her and make sure Natalie knows that you're only in for casual dates with her and that won't change.


    Edit: I just saw your post above, and I say you get into a serious relationship when you are willing to work out things for that one person knowing that it is not going to be perfect, but you feel that it has to be with that person.

    endlesswaltz on
  • badpoetbadpoet Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    You're right. There is no perfect match.

    However, the situation doesn't have a single decent relationship prospect in it. One woman is too dumb to take seriously, one not attractive enough, and the other isn't in the same area code.

    All of the choices are bad.

    Now, if you want/need to keep screwing the hot one, do it but don't try to hide that anything more than a FWB situation is impossible. As for you other friend, Katie, hang out with her and have fun. And, if you really want to talk to Andrea, call her up and chat, but keep in mind that she's not really available.

    Anyway, here's how I'm going to bet this thing turns out. You keep nailing Natalee, until she wises up and decides that she wants more. You end up ending things. You pine for Andrea, but you call her less and less. And Katie, stalwart Katie, deals with your drama and ends up dating another guy. At that point, you'll realize that you've fallen in love with Katie, but it's too late to do anything about it.



    Hey, that might make a couple hundred million as a romantic comedy...

    badpoet on
  • PirateJonPirateJon Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Choosing to not date either of these two women is not being 'non-commital'.

    PirateJon on
    all perfectionists are mediocre in their own eyes
  • BomanTheBearBomanTheBear Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    badpoet wrote: »
    You're right. There is no perfect match.

    However, the situation doesn't have a single decent relationship prospect in it. One woman is too dumb to take seriously, one not attractive enough, and the other isn't in the same area code.

    All of the choices are bad.

    Now, if you want/need to keep screwing the hot one, do it but don't try to hide that anything more than a FWB situation is impossible. As for you other friend, Katie, hang out with her and have fun. And, if you really want to talk to Andrea, call her up and chat, but keep in mind that she's not really available.

    Anyway, here's how I'm going to bet this thing turns out. You keep nailing Natalee, until she wises up and decides that she wants more. You end up ending things. You pine for Andrea, but you call her less and less. And Katie, stalwart Katie, deals with your drama and ends up dating another guy. At that point, you'll realize that you've fallen in love with Katie, but it's too late to do anything about it.



    Hey, that might make a couple hundred million as a romantic comedy...
    Thing is that Katie is indeed attractive, she just put herself in (what I previously did not know I had) my friend zone. I really couldn't imagine us being more. Perhaps that's subject to change, but I just don't see it. I wish I could change it.

    I mean, she's taken care of me when I've been sick and been there for me when I've needed help. I've done and will continue to do the same for her, but because I'd do it for all my friends. I wish I could return her feelings, you know?

    BomanTheBear on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • SarcastroSarcastro Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    d) None of the above?

    P.S. Natalies feelings are going to get hurt in the long run if you string her along just so you can bang her.

    Maybe keep going on that epic quest to find someone attractive that you can relate to? Then hope to god and fuck that she likes you back.

    Sarcastro on
  • badpoetbadpoet Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    badpoet wrote: »
    You're right. There is no perfect match.

    However, the situation doesn't have a single decent relationship prospect in it. One woman is too dumb to take seriously, one not attractive enough, and the other isn't in the same area code.

    All of the choices are bad.

    Now, if you want/need to keep screwing the hot one, do it but don't try to hide that anything more than a FWB situation is impossible. As for you other friend, Katie, hang out with her and have fun. And, if you really want to talk to Andrea, call her up and chat, but keep in mind that she's not really available.

    Anyway, here's how I'm going to bet this thing turns out. You keep nailing Natalee, until she wises up and decides that she wants more. You end up ending things. You pine for Andrea, but you call her less and less. And Katie, stalwart Katie, deals with your drama and ends up dating another guy. At that point, you'll realize that you've fallen in love with Katie, but it's too late to do anything about it.



    Hey, that might make a couple hundred million as a romantic comedy...
    Thing is that Katie is indeed attractive, she just put herself in (what I previously did not know I had) my friend zone. I really couldn't imagine us being more. Perhaps that's subject to change, but I just don't see it. I wish I could change it.

    I mean, she's taken care of me when I've been sick and been there for me when I've needed help. I've done and will continue to do the same for her, but because I'd do it for all my friends. I wish I could return her feelings, you know?

    I understand that, when I said she wasn't attractive, I meant "not attractive to you in that way". Does she have a boyfriend or has she had a boyfriend since you've known her?

    badpoet on
  • ChopperDaveChopperDave Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Ah, this is a detail that I neglected to mention. I have many groups of friends that only sortof intersect, and none of the three girls know each other.

    But I am starting to see a pattern. That I should be non-committal until a perfect match comes along. But how close to perfect is good enough? Isn't a flawed relationship the best that flawed people can do?

    The flaws need to be "man hands" level flaws. In other words, they need to be the kind of flaws that you're either imagining, or can get over.

    Lack of physical attraction or mental connection are flaws too big to ignore. You either have that or you don't, and if a girl doesn't appeal to you on both levels then you should probably find one that does.

    I'm adding my voice to the chorus preaching "keep things casual with all three." It's fine to be involved with them, as long as they know that you're not pursuing a relationship and are OK with it. You ought to find someone who you connect with on both a physical and mental level (and who lives near you) before you actually commit to her.

    ChopperDave on
    3DS code: 3007-8077-4055
  • BuckeyeBarnesBuckeyeBarnes Registered User new member
    edited June 2008
    Ah, this is a detail that I neglected to mention. I have many groups of friends that only sortof intersect, and none of the three girls know each other.

    But I am starting to see a pattern. That I should be non-committal until a perfect match comes along. But how close to perfect is good enough? Isn't a flawed relationship the best that flawed people can do?

    While it is very true that nobody is perfect, there are two things that stand out to me based on your previous explanations:

    1) "Natalie" would not be good in a relationship because you feel as though you can't communicate intelligently with her.

    2) "Katie" would not be good in a relationship because you're not physically attracted to her.

    As stated above, don't feel pressured to go exclusive. But there are certain aspects of a relationship that need to exist on some level for the relationship to work (i.e. mental stimulation, physical attraction).

    Unless you're dead-set on being a one-woman man all the time, there is no shame in playing the field. Who knows? They could be doing the same thing.

    BuckeyeBarnes on
  • RaggaholicRaggaholic Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Personally I'd have fun with the pair of them, but I dunno how comfortable you'd feel about that. Just don't specify that you're seeing them exclusively.
    I hope you see this... because I'm doing it as hard as I can.

    Raggaholic on
  • ihmmyihmmy Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Sarcastro wrote: »
    d) None of the above?

    P.S. Natalies feelings are going to get hurt in the long run if you string her along just so you can bang her.

    Maybe keep going on that epic quest to find someone attractive that you can relate to? Then hope to god and fuck that she likes you back.


    agreed. Natalie will probably end up hating you either because a) you're the asshole who uses her (in her mind, not in reality necessarily) or b) you swept her off her feet but dont' want to actually date her
    (this is from experience, my best friend ended up being FWB with her high school crush, and now loathes his guts due to him not actually sticking with her and basically using her while she wanted more)

    ihmmy on
  • BomanTheBearBomanTheBear Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Raggaholic wrote: »
    Personally I'd have fun with the pair of them, but I dunno how comfortable you'd feel about that. Just don't specify that you're seeing them exclusively.
    I hope you see this... because I'm doing it as hard as I can.

    Haha, I appreciate the emphasis. Well, I guess the answer is to just make it clear to both of them that I'm not interested in anything with them, and tell Andrea that nothing will ever come of us. I was hoping that wouldn't be the answer, but I guess it is. I really appreciate it, everyone, it really helped to hear it from all of you.

    BomanTheBear on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.