The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Ice on Mars!

Rufus_ShinraRufus_Shinra Registered User regular
edited June 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2045326920080620
Scientists working on NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander mission are reporting what they call compelling evidence that the robot craft has found ice while digging on the Martian surface.

NASA is expected to give details on the discovery during a news conference on Friday.

The small science probe landed safely last month on a frozen desert at the Martian north pole to search for water and assess conditions for sustaining life.

Small chunks of bright material described as the size of dice have disappeared from inside a trench where they were photographed by the craft earlier this week, NASA said in a statement late on Thursday.

This has convinced scientists the chunks were ice -- frozen water -- that vaporized after digging exposed it, NASA said.

"It must be ice," said mission principal investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona. "These little clumps completely disappearing over the course of a few days. That is perfect evidence that it's ice. There had been some question whether the bright material was salt. Salt can't do that."

The presence of water on Mars is a hot topic for scientists. They have presented strong evidence in recent years of huge deposits of frozen water at the Martian poles and point to geological features that indicate that large bodies of water have flowed on the planet's surface in the distant past.

Water is a key to the question of whether life, even in the form of mere microbes, has ever existed on Mars. On Earth, water is a necessary ingredient for life.

I think this is huge news. We suspected there probably was ice on mars, but now we know for sure. This has dramatic implications. The most sensationalist is of course that this increases the odds of life on mars. Life on another planet would be amazing both in its ability to humble us, but also for biologists to get a view of a life form that has a completely different evolutionary history than everything we know of today.

The second is more down the road, but I think the most interesting: The possibility of terraforming Mars for human sustainability. With the confirmation of water, it is now feasible to plan for creating a habitable atmosphere for Mars. With the knowledge of water, we can consider the possibility of terraforming using tools like plants and bacteria (which rely on water) to alter Mars' surface. The addition of plants like lichens would increase the amount of sunlight absorbed by the surface of Mars, as well as produce gases that could be used to trap in heat. Also, any human habitation on Mars would require large amounts of water, and the fact that its already there makes it more feasible to have colonies. Granted this is mostly speculation, but I think it is a possibility at some point in the future and we shouldn't limit our hopes because the technology and willpower doesn't exist yet.

So, anyone else excited? Anyone vehemently opposed to destroying the sanctity of Mars? Anyone merely want to talk about colonizing outside Earth?

Rufus_Shinra on
«134

Posts

  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Yay! Though I'm perplexed as to why they didn't sample it.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • GungHoGungHo Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    They couldn't sample it. It evaporated when they exposed it. I don't know if I'd be so comfortable to say that it must be H2O, though, simply because it disappeared.

    GungHo on
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Now all they need to find is some vodka, kahlua, and cream.

    moniker on
  • TeaSpoonTeaSpoon Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    "It must be ice," said mission principal investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona. "These little clumps completely disappearing over the course of a few days. That is perfect evidence that it's ice. There had been some question whether the bright material was salt. Salt can't do that."

    So, it took a while to disappear and no one thought to sample it. Or it was somehow technically impossible.

    Anyway, until real proof appears, I remain unconvinced. It could have been a lot of substances that evaporate at surface temperatures. And the argumentation is flawed to say the least.

    TeaSpoon on
  • TastyfishTastyfish Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Mars is probably one of the worst places to look for life compared to pretty much everywhere else in the solar system, though I suppose it might be one of the easier places to actually look. I'd be far more interested in life hunting missions to Europa, Titan and Venus or possible comet and asteroid chasing.

    Biggest draw I see in it would be that you would have a backup water supply should you start a base there, so if your asteroid harvesting mission gets delayed its not the end of the world. Then again, there isn't a lot of point in going to Mars other than the sight seeing though is there?

    Tastyfish on
  • GafotoGafoto Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Tastyfish wrote: »
    Mars is probably one of the worst places to look for life compared to pretty much everywhere else in the solar system, though I suppose it might be one of the easier places to actually look. I'd be far more interested in life hunting missions to Europa, Titan and Venus or possible comet and asteroid chasing.

    Biggest draw I see in it would be that you would have a backup water supply should you start a base there, so if your asteroid harvesting mission gets delayed its not the end of the world. Then again, there isn't a lot of point in going to Mars other than the sight seeing though is there?

    World population isn't going down.

    Gafoto on
    sierracrest.jpg
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Gafoto wrote: »
    Tastyfish wrote: »
    Mars is probably one of the worst places to look for life compared to pretty much everywhere else in the solar system, though I suppose it might be one of the easier places to actually look. I'd be far more interested in life hunting missions to Europa, Titan and Venus or possible comet and asteroid chasing.

    Biggest draw I see in it would be that you would have a backup water supply should you start a base there, so if your asteroid harvesting mission gets delayed its not the end of the world. Then again, there isn't a lot of point in going to Mars other than the sight seeing though is there?

    World population isn't going down.

    It is when you consider the impact development has on birth rates.

    moniker on
  • TastyfishTastyfish Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Which is another way of saying people are getting easier to come by, you'd need some odd combination of crazily rich but willing to part with all the benefits of said wealth forever in order to get peace and quiet. And enough of them to be profitable.

    Besides, probably takes more resources to feed someone on Mars than it does here. Its Habcomplexs before space colonies

    Tastyfish on
  • ShurakaiShurakai Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Water will certainly be good for colonization or at least a large base of some kind, but Terraforming of the entire planet is simply not feasible. Mars is a dead planet, with a cold core. This means that there is no magnetic field, which means that any atmosphere that we pump in would get stripped away within 200 years.

    In any case, its good that they have found semi-solid evidence of water.

    Shurakai on
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    GungHo wrote: »
    They couldn't sample it. It evaporated when they exposed it. I don't know if I'd be so comfortable to say that it must be H2O, though, simply because it disappeared.
    Yeah, it really could have been any solid that melted.

    Especially considering the weather reports I've seen peg the maximum temperature around -30 . . . and water freezes at 0.

    Andrew_Jay on
  • DarkCrawlerDarkCrawler Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Tastyfish wrote: »
    Mars is probably one of the worst places to look for life compared to pretty much everywhere else in the solar system, though I suppose it might be one of the easier places to actually look. I'd be far more interested in life hunting missions to Europa, Titan and Venus or possible comet and asteroid chasing.

    Biggest draw I see in it would be that you would have a backup water supply should you start a base there, so if your asteroid harvesting mission gets delayed its not the end of the world. Then again, there isn't a lot of point in going to Mars other than the sight seeing though is there?

    Venus?

    "As close to actual Hell as possible" - Venus? With all the volcanoes and craters and hyper-greenhouse effect and sulfur dioxide rain and 460 Celcius surface temperature....

    This place?

    250px-Mgn_p39146.png

    I've never heard anyone suggesting that it could support life. And if it could, I'm not sure if I want to meet anything that has evolved there. :P

    DarkCrawler on
  • Rabid_LlamaRabid_Llama Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    GungHo wrote: »
    They couldn't sample it. It evaporated when they exposed it. I don't know if I'd be so comfortable to say that it must be H2O, though, simply because it disappeared.

    I'm sorry but this is driving me nuts for some reason. It sublimated when they exposed it.

    Rabid_Llama on
    /sig
    The+Rabid+Llama.png
  • CantidoCantido Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Yay! Though I'm perplexed as to why they didn't sample it.

    They're waiting for John McCain to be POTUS D:

    Cantido on
    3DS Friendcode 5413-1311-3767
  • TastyfishTastyfish Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Because solar radiation strips away atmosphere? Thought Mars was just too small to hold any decent atmosphere as opposed to lacking a magnetosphere.

    Course, lacking any real atmosphere or magentosphere, wouldn't all your bases need to be pretty deep underground anyway. Adds to the start up cost, and the running cost but at least you wouldn't need to bother terraforming (or at least until you can start doing silly things like twisting vacuum to put singularities in the middle of it and thus increase the mass enough to hold onto your imported atmosphere)
    Tastyfish wrote: »
    Mars is probably one of the worst places to look for life compared to pretty much everywhere else in the solar system, though I suppose it might be one of the easier places to actually look. I'd be far more interested in life hunting missions to Europa, Titan and Venus or possible comet and asteroid chasing.

    Biggest draw I see in it would be that you would have a backup water supply should you start a base there, so if your asteroid harvesting mission gets delayed its not the end of the world. Then again, there isn't a lot of point in going to Mars other than the sight seeing though is there?

    Venus?

    "As close to actual Hell as possible" - Venus? With all the volcanoes and craters and hyper-greenhouse effect and sulfur dioxide rain and 460 Celcius surface temperature....

    This place?

    250px-Mgn_p39146.png

    I've never heard anyone suggesting that it could support life. And if it could, I'm not sure if I want to meet anything that has evolved there. :P

    The surface is pretty uninhabitable, but apparently there are some unusal structures in the upper atmosphere that seem to persist when they shouldn't do whilst also looking spectrographically like they might be photosynthetic. Been a couple of years since I had to look into it so, but in the mean time here is a bit from a really old uni assignment.
    Venus is generally consider to be too hostile now for life to exist, but earlier on in the Sun’s lifetime it was considerably cooler which could have made Venus cooler, especially if the run-away greenhouse effect had not occurred yet. Venus also probably had free water in the form of lakes and oceans several billion years ago, as suggested by the much higher deuterium/hydrogen ratio than Earth, if this is true, life could have arisen on Venus and may have evolved to be able to survive the run-away greenhouse effect. Although the surface of Venus is subject to immense atmospheric pressure and heat (91 times Earth’s surface atmospheric pressure and 477oC), at 50 kilometers above the surface it is only one atmosphere of pressure and around 70oC, well within the limits of thermophilic and hypothermophilic organisms on Earth, microbial life could be living in water droplets in the high atmosphere.
    The presence of life would also explain other anomalies in Venus’ atmosphere, if the organisms were using ultra-violet (UV) radiation as a energy source it would explain dark patches seen on Venus’ atmosphere in the UV spectrum. Also, there is significantly less carbon monoxide than would be expected, as large amounts of this would be produced in reactions caused by lightning and solar radiation, however there is hydrogen sulphide and sulphur dioxide instead, which is would react together and would not be present in such large quantities unless they are being continually produced or regenerated. As well as these, carbonyl sulphide was also found; a compound almost only produced by living organisms and considered a marker of life due to the difficulty of producing it inorganically.
    However it is not certain that life exists on Venus, a previously unknown catalyst could be present in the atmosphere (the reactions are usually very slow and need a catalyst to be involved for the reactions to be carried out fast enough to explain the quantities found in the atmosphere), also many scientists are skeptical whether or not organisms could exist in water droplets in the high atmosphere.

    Even on Europa we're not talking interesting life, just one thousand and one different types of slime and if you're really luck a worm or two. Its more a good sign because on four of the eight(ish) planets in our solar system there is something living.

    Tastyfish on
  • ShurakaiShurakai Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Tastyfish wrote: »
    Because solar radiation strips away atmosphere? Thought Mars was just too small to hold any decent atmosphere as opposed to lacking a magnetosphere.

    Course, lacking any real atmosphere or magentosphere, wouldn't all your bases need to be pretty deep underground anyway. Adds to the start up cost, and the running cost but at least you wouldn't need to bother terraforming (or at least until you can start doing silly things like twisting vacuum to put singularities in the middle of it and thus increase the mass enough to hold onto your imported atmosphere)

    Mars is actually just barely in the Green Zone for supporting life in our Solar system. If the planet was a couple times bigger, we would probably see life there today. It would probably be a snowball world, like Hoth, but still.

    Early in the Solar system's history, Mars was undoubtedly a habitable planet. Or at least it would have been reasonably warm and had a magnetosphere of some kind (though it's hard to tell how strong, Earth's is very strong because of the way we spin). Water ice is not a rare thing in our solar system, so there would have been plenty present on the surface in one form or another. Because of the planet's size, the mantle and core cooled much more rapidly than earth and lost it's magnetosphere,allowing the solar wind to strip away everything on the surface except dust. This is a theory, of course, but it is grounded in much scientific evidence.

    So yea, the best thing to do would be to build underground near the polar caps. This way you could avoid dust and electric storms as well as radiation. Also you could drill underground for water, obviously.

    Shurakai on
  • GungHoGungHo Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    GungHo wrote: »
    They couldn't sample it. It evaporated when they exposed it. I don't know if I'd be so comfortable to say that it must be H2O, though, simply because it disappeared.
    Yeah, it really could have been any solid that melted.

    Especially considering the weather reports I've seen peg the maximum temperature around -30 . . . and water freezes at 0.
    Air pressure on Mars is much lower, and different there are radiation characteristics, so I don't have hard time believing water ice would be beneathe the surface and sublimate when exposed (ok, Lllama? ;-)). I just have issue with them jumping to "it's there now it's gone, must be wawa!!!". I mean, there's a narrow list of suspects, but it could even be, say, dry ice. Especially if there was a eerie cloud around the rover.

    GungHo on
  • BubbaTBubbaT Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    GungHo wrote: »
    They couldn't sample it. It evaporated when they exposed it. I don't know if I'd be so comfortable to say that it must be H2O, though, simply because it disappeared.

    I'm sorry but this is driving me nuts for some reason. It sublimated when they exposed it.

    Wouldn't have happened if Kraid had started the reactor.

    BubbaT on
  • wunderbarwunderbar What Have I Done? Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    GungHo wrote: »
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    GungHo wrote: »
    They couldn't sample it. It evaporated when they exposed it. I don't know if I'd be so comfortable to say that it must be H2O, though, simply because it disappeared.
    Yeah, it really could have been any solid that melted.

    Especially considering the weather reports I've seen peg the maximum temperature around -30 . . . and water freezes at 0.
    Air pressure on Mars is much lower, and different there are radiation characteristics, so I don't have hard time believing water ice would be beneathe the surface and sublimate when exposed (ok, Lllama? ;-)). I just have issue with them jumping to "it's there now it's gone, must be wawa!!!". I mean, there's a narrow list of suspects, but it could even be, say, dry ice. Especially if there was a eerie cloud around the rover.

    They've already discounted dry ice(frozen carbon dioxide) because the combination of temperature and atomspheric pressure on Mars does not allow dry ice to form. They also thought it could be salt, but salt cannot sublimate.

    The reason they did not sample the ice they found(assuming it is ice) is because 1)they wanted to see if it *would* sublimate, which was a test on it's own, and 2)they were having some trouble getting another soil sample into the special ovens on the rover. the soil has to go through a series of filters, and with the first sample the soil was clumped together too much for it to easily pass through the filters, they had to figure out exactly how to do that, which took a few days to do/test with that first sample.

    wunderbar on
    XBL: thewunderbar PSN: thewunderbar NNID: thewunderbar Steam: wunderbar87 Twitter: wunderbar
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    GungHo wrote: »
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    GungHo wrote: »
    They couldn't sample it. It evaporated when they exposed it. I don't know if I'd be so comfortable to say that it must be H2O, though, simply because it disappeared.
    Yeah, it really could have been any solid that melted.

    Especially considering the weather reports I've seen peg the maximum temperature around -30 . . . and water freezes at 0.
    Air pressure on Mars is much lower, and different there are radiation characteristics . . .
    Ah, okay. As soon as I had posted that I remembered that the pressure would be off . . . but forgot how that would affect it.

    Andrew_Jay on
  • amateurhouramateurhour One day I'll be professionalhour The woods somewhere in TennesseeRegistered User regular
    edited June 2008
    also, the rover had some problems with the flash ram for commands and had to have new programming sent to it, which takes a long as time over the course of earth to mars. From what I hear this delayed a lot of their testing during prime enviromental conditions

    amateurhour on
    are YOU on the beer list?
  • BasarBasar IstanbulRegistered User regular
    edited June 2008
    It doesn't matter so much that there's ice on Mars but would make me a happy space traveler if they come across some Scotch.

    Basar on
    i live in a country with a batshit crazy president and no, english is not my first language

  • GihgehlsGihgehls Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    TeaSpoon wrote: »
    "It must be ice," said mission principal investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona. "These little clumps completely disappearing over the course of a few days. That is perfect evidence that it's ice. There had been some question whether the bright material was salt. Salt can't do that."

    So, it took a while to disappear and no one thought to sample it. Or it was somehow technically impossible.

    Anyway, until real proof appears, I remain unconvinced. It could have been a lot of substances that evaporate at surface temperatures. And the argumentation is flawed to say the least.

    You guys are right. NASA has no idea what they are doing. You should write them a letter.

    Gihgehls on
    PA-gihgehls-sig.jpg
  • XtarathXtarath Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Gihgehls wrote: »
    TeaSpoon wrote: »
    "It must be ice," said mission principal investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona. "These little clumps completely disappearing over the course of a few days. That is perfect evidence that it's ice. There had been some question whether the bright material was salt. Salt can't do that."

    So, it took a while to disappear and no one thought to sample it. Or it was somehow technically impossible.

    Anyway, until real proof appears, I remain unconvinced. It could have been a lot of substances that evaporate at surface temperatures. And the argumentation is flawed to say the least.

    You guys are right. NASA has no idea what they are doing. You should write them a letter.

    Of course they know what they are doing, what with the fake moon landing and UFOs.


    *Dons a tinfoil hat*

    In all seriousness this is great news, I for one look forward to our disappearing ice overlords.

    Xtarath on
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Okay this is all great and all but why can they do this but not invent a deodorant that lasts more than 12 hours?

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • BasarBasar IstanbulRegistered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Kagera wrote: »
    Okay this is all great and all but why can they do this but not invent a deodorant that lasts more than 12 hours?

    Well that and a pill that will help my lazy ass lose weight?

    Basar on
    i live in a country with a batshit crazy president and no, english is not my first language

  • OremLKOremLK Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Ah, I love talking about Venus. Personally I think our best bet for colonizing someplace off Earth would be to have floating cities on Venus--at the right height, the temperature is Earth normal, plenty of sunlight to power everything, and floating stuff is easier because of the thicker atmosphere.

    Okay, so that's a layman's look.

    OremLK on
    My zombie survival life simulator They Don't Sleep is out now on Steam if you want to check it out.
  • ProfsProfs Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    The lack of water really kills though.

    Profs on
  • OremLKOremLK Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    You'd probably need to have an orbital station capable of bringing in (chunks of) comets or something crazy like that.

    OremLK on
    My zombie survival life simulator They Don't Sleep is out now on Steam if you want to check it out.
  • TastyfishTastyfish Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    If God didn't want us to bombard a planet with water-laden rocks, he wouldn't have given us the nukes and the asteroid belt.

    Tastyfish on
  • AegisAegis Fear My Dance Overshot Toronto, Landed in OttawaRegistered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Holy shit:
    The content of Green Mars is included on the 'Phoenix DVD', carried onboard of Phoenix, a NASA lander which successfully touched down on Mars in May 2008.

    Clearly it was a good luck charm for finding water.

    Aegis on
    We'll see how long this blog lasts
    Currently DMing: None :(
    Characters
    [5e] Dural Melairkyn - AC 18 | HP 40 | Melee +5/1d8+3 | Spell +4/DC 12
  • GafotoGafoto Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    OremLK wrote: »
    You'd probably need to have an orbital station capable of bringing in (chunks of) comets or something crazy like that.

    Set off nukes to remove Europa from orbit
    crash moon into venus
    ????
    earth II!

    Gafoto on
    sierracrest.jpg
  • XtarathXtarath Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Gafoto wrote: »
    OremLK wrote: »
    You'd probably need to have an orbital station capable of bringing in (chunks of) comets or something crazy like that.

    Set off nukes to remove Europa from orbit
    crash moon into venus
    ????
    earth II!

    NASA says "It seemed like a good idea at the time."

    Xtarath on
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Man there's never any love for Ganymede

    Ganymede is awesome

    Salvation122 on
  • sp1ttlesp1ttle Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    I think Europa is a better chance for finding life outside of Earth. There's evidence that it may hava a liquid ocean underneath the frozen surface, and if there is some geological activity there might be lifeforms similar to the kind we find on oceanic deep sea vents.

    sp1ttle on
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Man there's never any love for Ganymede

    Ganymede is awesome

    I only learned of Ganymede through the Genesis game Target: Earth.

    So it has sentimental value to me.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • Zilla360Zilla360 21st Century. |She/Her| Trans* Woman In Aviators Firing A Bazooka. ⚛️Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    If only we could do something to alter Mars's magnetosphere. Terraforming it only to lose the atmosphere later seems so unfair in an universal sense.

    Isn't the Earth going to be vastly overpopulated in 20-30 years? We need Mars to survive as a species.

    Zilla360 on
  • SkutSkutSkutSkut Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Zilla360 wrote: »
    If only we could do something to alter Mars's magnetosphere. Terraforming it only to lose the atmosphere later seems so unfair in an universal sense.

    Isn't the Earth going to be vastly overpopulated in 20-30 years? We need Mars to survive as a species.

    I'm sure pumping it up every 200 years would be viable until a more permanent solution was found.

    SkutSkut on
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited June 2008
    SkutSkut wrote: »
    Zilla360 wrote: »
    If only we could do something to alter Mars's magnetosphere. Terraforming it only to lose the atmosphere later seems so unfair in an universal sense.

    Isn't the Earth going to be vastly overpopulated in 20-30 years? We need Mars to survive as a species.

    I'm sure pumping it up every 200 years would be viable until a more permanent solution was found.

    Maybe if we just took our greenhouse gases over there with a large pipe..

    Incenjucar on
  • Casually HardcoreCasually Hardcore Once an Asshole. Trying to be better. Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Why go through that much trouble?

    Engineer a super bug and wait a few years for a few billion people to die. Then vaccinate the lucky ones.

    Casually Hardcore on
  • Zilla360Zilla360 21st Century. |She/Her| Trans* Woman In Aviators Firing A Bazooka. ⚛️Registered User regular
    edited June 2008
    Good point.
    1831911413_0fee7ea8f0.jpg

    Zilla360 on
Sign In or Register to comment.