The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Now I understand why you make people wait a minute between each search - no search function works particularly smoothly. But what I don't understand is why when I enter a bad search term, for example one that returns an error because I searched for a three letter word why I should still wait a minute. I mean, nothing was searched, you just scanned the string. This does not clog up the servers, so the one minute rule is not required, and incredibly annoying.
theSquid on
0
Posts
Caulk Bite 6One of the multitude of Dans infesting this placeRegistered Userregular
edited July 2008
I would assume that it was easier to code, that way.
I have difficulty believing that what I suggested makes it unstable at the risk of complexity. In fact I have difficulty believing it would take more than the addition of a single boolean.
I have difficulty believing that what I suggested makes it unstable at the risk of complexity. In fact I have difficulty believing it would take more than the addition of a single boolean.
At the very least I think it would require the introduction of a new conditional statement, but your point is taken. Another interesting point is that every line of code we write that directly modifies the vBulletin engine. When vBulletin rolls a new version we must hand merge file that we have altered rather than simply using the distributed files/patches.
In that light, the complexity becomes a lot more believable.
As far as an answer, I personally am in favor of replacing the current search technology with something that performs better. As it stands, the forum's search feature takes up more database and webserver processing time than any other application here at Penny Arcade.
If I'm stepping on anyones toes or saying something stupid feel free to call me an idiot. But since you guys pay for vbulletin, would it be worthwhile to complain about the clunkiness of their search code?
If I'm stepping on anyones toes or saying something stupid feel free to call me an idiot. But since you guys pay for vbulletin, would it be worthwhile to complain about the clunkiness of their search code?
I believe that Ramius is planning on removing their search code entirely and replacing it.
As much recoding as you guys have done for the forums. I'm amazed you didn't take a free based forum code and reworked it, instead of paying for vBulletin.
Edit.
Not saying you guys should or anything, and I realize it would of been a lot of work, just surprised you didn't.
DeShadowC on
0
ASimPersonCold...... and hard.Registered Userregular
edited July 2008
The previous version of the boards was exactly that - phpBB hacked together to try to make it scalable.
They got fed up with it and replaced with vBulletin.
Posts
More stable, and the like.
At the very least I think it would require the introduction of a new conditional statement, but your point is taken. Another interesting point is that every line of code we write that directly modifies the vBulletin engine. When vBulletin rolls a new version we must hand merge file that we have altered rather than simply using the distributed files/patches.
In that light, the complexity becomes a lot more believable.
As far as an answer, I personally am in favor of replacing the current search technology with something that performs better. As it stands, the forum's search feature takes up more database and webserver processing time than any other application here at Penny Arcade.
Edit.
Not saying you guys should or anything, and I realize it would of been a lot of work, just surprised you didn't.
They got fed up with it and replaced with vBulletin.
I lurked in those days. It was easy to see why.
The forums now are way better, even if the search is cumbersome.