The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
But Turing seems like he was a pretty alright guy.
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
and your evidence that humans do anything but is...?
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
But Turing seems like he was a pretty alright guy.
that's what makes me laugh about it
it doesn't actually test the intelligence of a system, just its bluffing ability
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
But Turing seems like he was a pretty alright guy.
that's what makes me laugh about it
it doesn't actually test the intelligence of a system, just its bluffing ability
except that the scope of the turing test is so wide that its bluffing ability is realistically beyond the ability of any programmer, so the turing test still holds
turing explicitly states that the test is designed to seperate 'learned from rote' from an actual understanding of the questions asked
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
and your evidence that humans do anything but is...?
Are you saying that all of the various human societies and cultures that exist, and have existed, are the result of purely mechanical processes? I don't have strict proof one way or another, but that's pretty implausible.
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
and your evidence that humans do anything but is...?
Are you saying that all of the various human societies and cultures that exist, and have existed, are the result of purely mechanical processes? I don't have strict proof one way or another, but that's pretty implausible.
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
But Turing seems like he was a pretty alright guy.
that's what makes me laugh about it
it doesn't actually test the intelligence of a system, just its bluffing ability
except that the scope of the turing test is so wide that its bluffing ability is realistically beyond the ability of any programmer, so the turing test still holds
turing explicitly states that the test is designed to seperate 'learned from rote' from an actual understanding of the questions asked
still doesn't actually test consciousness/intelligence, just imitation
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
and your evidence that humans do anything but is...?
Are you saying that all of the various human societies and cultures that exist, and have existed, are the result of purely mechanical processes? I don't have strict proof one way or another, but that's pretty implausible.
well yeah
souls dont exist
I never said they do.
Consciousness and free will don't need to have a supernatural explanation.
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
and your evidence that humans do anything but is...?
Are you saying that all of the various human societies and cultures that exist, and have existed, are the result of purely mechanical processes? I don't have strict proof one way or another, but that's pretty implausible.
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
and your evidence that humans do anything but is...?
Are you saying that all of the various human societies and cultures that exist, and have existed, are the result of purely mechanical processes? I don't have strict proof one way or another, but that's pretty implausible.
well yeah
souls dont exist
I never said they do.
so then everything occurs by physical processes
Zoolander on
0
Tossrocktoo weird to livetoo rare to dieRegistered Userregular
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
But Turing seems like he was a pretty alright guy.
Yeah, only, no.
If you consider the test a game tree, the game complexity of an english language conversation grows faster than it would be possible to compute. Brute forcing every possible response to every possible query at every possible depth level would require more storage space than there are atoms in the observable universe. It's impossible.
The only way to really do it is with some kind of heuristic that is capable of forming new responses, and at the point where your heuristic reaches such complexity as to be indistinguishable from intelligence, who's to say it isn't intelligence?
If someone built a super-fast computer with a ridiculous amount of storage, and had coders spend the equivalent of many lifetimes writing its software, it could probably brute-force the Turing Test and pass.
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
and your evidence that humans do anything but is...?
Are you saying that all of the various human societies and cultures that exist, and have existed, are the result of purely mechanical processes? I don't have strict proof one way or another, but that's pretty implausible.
Posts
the future that never was...
AN AI CONSTRUCT WILL PASS THE TURING TEST BY 2029
that is the face of a man who is thinking
'HA HA GODEL CAN SUCK MY DICK, COMPUTERS WILL TOTALLY PASS THE TURING TEST ONE DAY'
tossrock you're a transhumanist right
it's pretty funny because basically the turing test ain't shit
what is the turing test
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test
I heard homophobia got widespread at around that time. Before men were alot more affectionate, body contact was not taboo and all that shit.
Just imagine all the manhugs that law cost us.
eat a dick turing
your machines can eat a dick too
e: and someone who can't spell
Every moment 1 1/16 is born.
Locked inside Turings castle.
he'd be all fuuuuuuck yeah and you'd be all let's bone and then you'd bone
That doesn't mean it's any smarter than a pocket calculator.
But Turing seems like he was a pretty alright guy.
that's what makes me laugh about it
it doesn't actually test the intelligence of a system, just its bluffing ability
yep
turing explicitly states that the test is designed to seperate 'learned from rote' from an actual understanding of the questions asked
Are you saying that all of the various human societies and cultures that exist, and have existed, are the result of purely mechanical processes? I don't have strict proof one way or another, but that's pretty implausible.
well yeah
souls dont exist
I never said they do.
Consciousness and free will don't need to have a supernatural explanation.
Yeah, only, no.
If you consider the test a game tree, the game complexity of an english language conversation grows faster than it would be possible to compute. Brute forcing every possible response to every possible query at every possible depth level would require more storage space than there are atoms in the observable universe. It's impossible.
The only way to really do it is with some kind of heuristic that is capable of forming new responses, and at the point where your heuristic reaches such complexity as to be indistinguishable from intelligence, who's to say it isn't intelligence?
Also, fuck John Searle.
I don't see how that makes free will impossible.