The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Smoking while pregnant...

DarkCrawlerDarkCrawler Registered User regular
edited August 2008 in Debate and/or Discourse
Should it be illegal? This discussion rose up with some of my friends when we saw a pregnant woman smoking...The child has no choice on it, and I think the intake might be bigger then simply standing on a same room when the oxygen comes directly from the mother. You could extend the same thing on alcohol as well, if you want. Or some other harmful substances if you want. Marijuana, etc. Just by googling, you can find that there are health effects on the child.
http://www.drspock.com/article/0,1510,4547,00.html
http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/health_advice/facts/pregnantsmoking.htm
http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/pp/womens/obsmoking/SmokingWhilePregnant.html

What do people think? On the other hand, it's a choice between the woman's freedom...on the other hand, the child's safety.

DarkCrawler on
«13

Posts

  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2008
    It should also be illegal for pregnant women to

    - ride in a car
    - go on a plane
    - eat undercooked meat
    - eat Cheetos
    - go outside




    Yeah no.

    Medopine on
  • Robos A Go GoRobos A Go Go Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    No.

    There should be programs to help pregnant women break their addictions, however, assuming there aren't already.

    Women and men who complete them along with other parenting courses should also receive a tax credit.

    Robos A Go Go on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    How exactly would you enforce this law?

    Quid on
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2008
    Woops, wrong thread

    Medopine on
  • CptKemzikCptKemzik Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    By that logic women shouldn't be allowed to get abortions either. It may be bad for the child but ultimately it's the woman's choice on what to do even if that choice is dumb.

    CptKemzik on
  • TrusTrus Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Quid wrote: »
    How exactly would you enforce this law?

    my guess would be that if a cop saw a pregnant woman smoking they would fine/arrest her.

    Trus on
    qFN53.png
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Trus wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    How exactly would you enforce this law?

    my guess would be that if a cop saw a pregnant woman smoking they would fine/arrest her.
    So, any woman with a pot belly and smoking?

    Quid on
  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    CptKemzik wrote: »
    By that logic women shouldn't be allowed to get abortions either. It may be bad for the child but ultimately it's the woman's choice on what to do even if that choice is dumb.

    Not exactly. An abortion ends the pregnancy while smoking while pregnant causes health problems in the child that persist after birth.

    Marathon on
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2008
    Marathon wrote: »
    CptKemzik wrote: »
    By that logic women shouldn't be allowed to get abortions either. It may be bad for the child but ultimately it's the woman's choice on what to do even if that choice is dumb.

    Not exactly. An abortion ends the pregnancy while smoking while pregnant causes health problems in the child that persist after birth.

    Can we stop this before we begin...

    Medopine on
  • TrusTrus Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Quid wrote: »
    Trus wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    How exactly would you enforce this law?

    my guess would be that if a cop saw a pregnant woman smoking they would fine/arrest her.
    So, any woman with a pot belly and smoking?

    You can tell, with a pretty good certainty, if a woman is pregnant, they look decently different enough from an overweight person you can probably tell. If you have doubts the officer can innocently ask the woman when the baby is due :P

    Trus on
    qFN53.png
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2008
    Trus wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    Trus wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    How exactly would you enforce this law?

    my guess would be that if a cop saw a pregnant woman smoking they would fine/arrest her.
    So, any woman with a pot belly and smoking?

    You can tell, with a pretty good certainty, if a woman is pregnant, they look decently different enough from an overweight person you can probably tell. If you have doubts the officer can innocently ask the woman when the baby is due :P
    Does she have to carry around a certificate of pregnancy or non pregnancy to prove it if she says she's not pregnant? Or does the cop get to arrest and take her to the gyno?

    What about women who are pregnant and aren't showing yet? What about women who are pregnant but don't know it yet?

    Medopine on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Trus wrote: »
    You can tell, with a pretty good certainty, if a woman is pregnant, they look decently different enough from an overweight person you can probably tell. If you have doubts the officer can innocently ask the woman when the baby is due :P
    And she'd say no because she'd know the consequences.

    So again, are cops going to be allowed to arrest people they think are pregnant?

    Quid on
  • TrusTrus Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    You could handle it like a traffic ticket, if you get fined and you are in fact not pregnant you could go to court and contest the ticket.

    Lets be clear, I'm not in favour of this I simply answered how they could enforce it.

    Trus on
    qFN53.png
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Let me rephrase my question: How would they enforce it in a non stupid way?

    Forcing a woman to show up in court, most likely repeatedly because of her appearance is not a non stupid way.

    Quid on
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2008
    Trus wrote: »
    You could handle it like a traffic ticket, if you get fined and you are in fact not pregnant you could go to court and contest the ticket.

    Lets be clear, I'm not in favour of this I simply answered how they could enforce it.

    Yeah that wouldn't be so hot, considering every woman on the street smoking a cigarette could be ticketed.

    Medopine on
  • nomenome Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    I don't think it should be illegal precisely because it would be unenforceable. Having said that, I've cussed out complete strangers before because they were smoking and obviously pregnant. This is kind of a pet peeve of mine. I usually start by asking them if they realize just how much damage they are doing to the fetus. They usually respond with "it's my body and I can do what I want" inwhich case I say it's 'his' (points to stomach area) body and not her's. By this point things have usually degraded to a screaming match until the husband shows up. I've also told husbands that they should be ashamed of themselves for allowing the wife to smoke while pregnant. Oddly enough the husbands usually get this guilty look on their faces and hurriedly leave with their wives. It is always only the women that get all pissed off and argues back at me. Life is already going to be hard enough for the kid but to purposefully disadvantage them before they're even born really gets to me.

    nome on
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited August 2008
    I'm fine with children being able to sue the crap out of their dumbass mothers for knowingly damaging their health. It's the only thing that's at all practical. Enforcement would be a nightmare. If you're going to bring a child to term, yeah, you should be liable for ensuring its long-term suffering you knowingly could have avoided.

    Incenjucar on
  • skyybahamutskyybahamut Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    This is from the 2nd link:

    How smoking harms the unborn baby

    Babies born to mothers who smoke:

    are more likely to be born prematurely and with a low birth weight (below 2.5kg or 5lb 8oz).

    have a birth weight on average 200g (7oz) less than those born to non-smokers. This effect increases proportionally - the more the mother smokes, the less the child weighs.

    have organs that are smaller on average than babies born to non-smokers.

    have poorer lung function.

    are twice as likely to die from cot death. There seems to be a direct link between cot death and parents smoking.

    are ill more frequently. Babies born to women who smoked 15 cigarettes or more a day during pregnancy are taken into hospital twice as often during the first eight months of life.

    get painful diseases such as inflammation of the middle ear and asthmatic bronchitis more frequently in early childhood.

    are more likely to become smokers themselves in later years.

    In addition, pregnant women who smoke increase their risk of early miscarriage.

    In later pregnancy, smoking mothers are at increased risk of the baby's placenta coming away from the womb before the baby is born (placental abruption). This may cause the baby to be born prematurely, starve of oxygen, or even to die in the womb (stillborn).
    /
    I can personally attest to the bolded part. My mom smoked a pack a day while pregnant. My brother has athsma (sp). I got bronchitis 2-3 times a year for my first ten years and one ear infection a year at least as a kid.

    All that said and done I rarely get sick now. Unless I get a bout of some Superflu I think I'm gonna be ok.

    skyybahamut on
    This signature is for SCIENCE!
  • TrusTrus Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    baring enforcement, I have changed my mind on this. Smoking is not a right, its a privilege. People get privileges taken away all the time for the good of themselves or others. Not being to drive while drunk comes to mind.

    Trus on
    qFN53.png
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    I don't think you'll find anyone thinking pregnant women shouldn't smoke.

    You will find people saying creating and trying to enforce said law is ridiculous.

    Quid on
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2008
    Trus wrote: »
    baring enforcement, I have changed my mind on this. Smoking is not a right, its a privilege. People get privileges taken away all the time for the good of themselves or others. Not being to drive while drunk comes to mind.

    Can you explain how a criminal law that applies to women and not men is Constitutional?

    Smoking is not analogous to driving. You don't get a smoking license from the State. There aren't smoking rules of the road.

    If you want to prevent women from smoking while pregnant, making cigarettes or tobacco an illegal drug is the only way to do it.

    Medopine on
  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Aside from the whole Tobacco Mobsters thing, I'm all for making non-medical tobacco illegal. :P

    More realistically, I'm comfortable with kids being able to sue anyone who smoked regularly around their mother which may be believed to cause symptoms.

    Incenjucar on
  • HevachHevach Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Trus wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    How exactly would you enforce this law?

    my guess would be that if a cop saw a pregnant woman smoking they would fine/arrest her.

    More likely would be a matter for child welfare or whatever the equivalent agency is in the jurisdiction. There's a lot of things that are illegal that don't involve the police.

    Hevach on
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    So you can kill the baby, but no smoking, that would hurt it!
    /sarcasm
    I support both legal abortions and legal smoking while pregnant. If we're going to say that a pregnant woman has fewer rights than other Americans it should be written down, and that would be absurd.

    Picardathon on
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Trus wrote: »
    Quid wrote: »
    How exactly would you enforce this law?

    my guess would be that if a cop saw a pregnant woman smoking they would fine/arrest her.

    I'm sure the stress a pregnant woman would go through getting arrested and thrown in jail is great for the baby too.

    Drake on
  • DeShadowCDeShadowC Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Medopine wrote: »
    Trus wrote: »
    baring enforcement, I have changed my mind on this. Smoking is not a right, its a privilege. People get privileges taken away all the time for the good of themselves or others. Not being to drive while drunk comes to mind.

    Can you explain how a criminal law that applies to women and not men is Constitutional?

    Smoking is not analogous to driving. You don't get a smoking license from the State. There aren't smoking rules of the road.

    If you want to prevent women from smoking while pregnant, making cigarettes or tobacco an illegal drug is the only way to do it.

    I'm perfectly fine with this, and Incenjucar what if it was your mother smoking instead of people smoking around her?

    DeShadowC on
  • lunasealunasea Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    nome wrote: »
    I don't think it should be illegal precisely because it would be unenforceable. Having said that, I've cussed out complete strangers before because they were smoking and obviously pregnant. This is kind of a pet peeve of mine. I usually start by asking them if they realize just how much damage they are doing to the fetus. They usually respond with "it's my body and I can do what I want" inwhich case I say it's 'his' (points to stomach area) body and not her's. By this point things have usually degraded to a screaming match until the husband shows up. I've also told husbands that they should be ashamed of themselves for allowing the wife to smoke while pregnant. Oddly enough the husbands usually get this guilty look on their faces and hurriedly leave with their wives. It is always only the women that get all pissed off and argues back at me. Life is already going to be hard enough for the kid but to purposefully disadvantage them before they're even born really gets to me.

    People like you are a pet peeve of mine.

    Who do you think you are? What good can you possibly accomplish by outing somebody? I don't think I've ever met a person that has responded well to unsolicited criticism from strangers, especially strangers who feel the need to scream to the world their moral high road. Have you ever thought of the kinds of lessons you'll be teaching your kids? Construction through destruction is only meant for the military and demolition. In any case, the decision to smoke while pregnant is, admittedly, a highly reprehensible one but it's also no ones place to berate them for making it. Let the mother explain to her kid why he can't play any of the sports the other kids do because he has asthma.

    lunasea on
  • lunasealunasea Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    Medopine wrote: »
    Trus wrote: »
    baring enforcement, I have changed my mind on this. Smoking is not a right, its a privilege. People get privileges taken away all the time for the good of themselves or others. Not being to drive while drunk comes to mind.

    Can you explain how a criminal law that applies to women and not men is Constitutional?

    Smoking is not analogous to driving. You don't get a smoking license from the State. There aren't smoking rules of the road.

    If you want to prevent women from smoking while pregnant, making cigarettes or tobacco an illegal drug is the only way to do it.

    I'm perfectly fine with this, and Incenjucar what if it was your mother smoking instead of people smoking around her?

    Making tobacco illegal would have tremendous social, legal, and economic repercussions. Be serious.

    lunasea on
  • DeShadowCDeShadowC Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    lunasea wrote: »
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    Medopine wrote: »
    Trus wrote: »
    baring enforcement, I have changed my mind on this. Smoking is not a right, its a privilege. People get privileges taken away all the time for the good of themselves or others. Not being to drive while drunk comes to mind.

    Can you explain how a criminal law that applies to women and not men is Constitutional?

    Smoking is not analogous to driving. You don't get a smoking license from the State. There aren't smoking rules of the road.

    If you want to prevent women from smoking while pregnant, making cigarettes or tobacco an illegal drug is the only way to do it.

    I'm perfectly fine with this, and Incenjucar what if it was your mother smoking instead of people smoking around her?

    Making tobacco illegal would have tremendous social, legal, and economic repercussions. Be serious.

    I am serious and would vote for making tobacco illegal. Just like I voted to make it illegal to smoke in public buildings or with in 25 feet of an entrance or exit to a public building.

    DeShadowC on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Good work Shadow. Nothing like someone willing to encourage organized crime.

    Quid on
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2008
    Okay. Do you agree then that a specifically targetting pregnant women who smoke is impracticable and unconstitutional?

    Medopine on
  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    nome wrote: »
    I don't think it should be illegal precisely because it would be unenforceable. Having said that, I've cussed out complete strangers before because they were smoking and obviously pregnant. This is kind of a pet peeve of mine. I usually start by asking them if they realize just how much damage they are doing to the fetus. They usually respond with "it's my body and I can do what I want" inwhich case I say it's 'his' (points to stomach area) body and not her's. By this point things have usually degraded to a screaming match until the husband shows up. I've also told husbands that they should be ashamed of themselves for allowing the wife to smoke while pregnant. Oddly enough the husbands usually get this guilty look on their faces and hurriedly leave with their wives. It is always only the women that get all pissed off and argues back at me. Life is already going to be hard enough for the kid but to purposefully disadvantage them before they're even born really gets to me.

    Yeah, fuck those husbands who "let" their wives act like individuals. Fucking morons! Men are the ones with joysticks, they should control the whole party right?

    Drez on
    Switch: SW-7690-2320-9238Steam/PSN/Xbox: Drezdar
  • DeShadowCDeShadowC Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Medopine wrote: »
    Okay. Do you agree then that a specifically targetting pregnant women who smoke is impracticable and unconstitutional?

    Yes. I'd vote against a law making it illegal for pregnant women to smoke.

    DeShadowC on
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    lunasea wrote: »
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    Medopine wrote: »
    Trus wrote: »
    baring enforcement, I have changed my mind on this. Smoking is not a right, its a privilege. People get privileges taken away all the time for the good of themselves or others. Not being to drive while drunk comes to mind.

    Can you explain how a criminal law that applies to women and not men is Constitutional?

    Smoking is not analogous to driving. You don't get a smoking license from the State. There aren't smoking rules of the road.

    If you want to prevent women from smoking while pregnant, making cigarettes or tobacco an illegal drug is the only way to do it.

    I'm perfectly fine with this, and Incenjucar what if it was your mother smoking instead of people smoking around her?

    Making tobacco illegal would have tremendous social, legal, and economic repercussions. Be serious.

    I am serious and would vote for making tobacco illegal. Just like I voted to make it illegal to smoke in public buildings or with in 25 feet of an entrance or exit to a public building.

    You know what happened that time we made alcohol illegal, right?
    ...
    I think that weed is going to be the next moonshine. I don't know how I feel about this.

    Picardathon on
  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Quid wrote: »
    Good work Shadow. Nothing like someone willing to encourage organized crime.

    Well there's a midpoint. I don't agree with an outright ban on smoking but I do wish it would be illegal on bus stops. I want to punch those people in the head. Actually strike that. Either one or the other: Make it illegal to smoke on bus stops OR make it legal to punch bus stop smokers in the head. I'm good with either.

    Drez on
    Switch: SW-7690-2320-9238Steam/PSN/Xbox: Drezdar
  • DeShadowCDeShadowC Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    lunasea wrote: »
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    Medopine wrote: »
    Trus wrote: »
    baring enforcement, I have changed my mind on this. Smoking is not a right, its a privilege. People get privileges taken away all the time for the good of themselves or others. Not being to drive while drunk comes to mind.

    Can you explain how a criminal law that applies to women and not men is Constitutional?

    Smoking is not analogous to driving. You don't get a smoking license from the State. There aren't smoking rules of the road.

    If you want to prevent women from smoking while pregnant, making cigarettes or tobacco an illegal drug is the only way to do it.

    I'm perfectly fine with this, and Incenjucar what if it was your mother smoking instead of people smoking around her?

    Making tobacco illegal would have tremendous social, legal, and economic repercussions. Be serious.

    I am serious and would vote for making tobacco illegal. Just like I voted to make it illegal to smoke in public buildings or with in 25 feet of an entrance or exit to a public building.

    You know what happened that time we made alcohol illegal, right?
    ...
    I think that weed is going to be the next moonshine. I don't know how I feel about this.

    Not making a law because people are going to break it isn't a good reason not to make a law. And yes I know my US history.

    DeShadowC on
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    Not making a law because people are going to break it isn't a good reason not to make a law. And yes I know my US history.
    Not making a law because because it will not solve the problem and likely lead to more problems than it solves would be an excellent reason not to though.

    Quid on
  • DeShadowCDeShadowC Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    Actually if you enforce it, which I could see happening better now a days then during prohibition days, it'll solve a lot of problems, and save the country a lot of money each year on health related issues.

    DeShadowC on
  • PicardathonPicardathon Registered User regular
    edited August 2008
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    lunasea wrote: »
    DeShadowC wrote: »
    Medopine wrote: »
    Trus wrote: »
    baring enforcement, I have changed my mind on this. Smoking is not a right, its a privilege. People get privileges taken away all the time for the good of themselves or others. Not being to drive while drunk comes to mind.

    Can you explain how a criminal law that applies to women and not men is Constitutional?

    Smoking is not analogous to driving. You don't get a smoking license from the State. There aren't smoking rules of the road.

    If you want to prevent women from smoking while pregnant, making cigarettes or tobacco an illegal drug is the only way to do it.

    I'm perfectly fine with this, and Incenjucar what if it was your mother smoking instead of people smoking around her?

    Making tobacco illegal would have tremendous social, legal, and economic repercussions. Be serious.

    I am serious and would vote for making tobacco illegal. Just like I voted to make it illegal to smoke in public buildings or with in 25 feet of an entrance or exit to a public building.

    You know what happened that time we made alcohol illegal, right?
    ...
    I think that weed is going to be the next moonshine. I don't know how I feel about this.

    Not making a law because people are going to break it isn't a good reason not to make a law. And yes I know my US history.

    It's more that people as a whole will hurt themselves more while breaking the law then they would if there was no law in the first place, even if you factor in that some people would obey it.
    Tobacco and Alcohol are too strongly ingrained in the American culture for any law that makes them outright illegal to work, based on the above principle.

    Picardathon on
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2008
    Regulation of tobacco, however, can be done. Just not specifically making pregnant women criminally liable for smoking.

    Medopine on
Sign In or Register to comment.